Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Экология ВИЭ / СЭС / Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development.pdf
Скачиваний:
17
Добавлен:
31.03.2015
Размер:
9.69 Mб
Скачать

1

5.23 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 5 OF THE DRAFT SOLAR PEIS

2

 

3

This section presents corrections to material presented in the Draft Solar PEIS. The need

4for these corrections was identified in several ways: through comments received on the Draft

5Solar PEIS and the Supplement to the Draft (and verified by the authors), through new

6 information obtained by the authors subsequent to publication of the Draft Solar PEIS and the 7 Supplement to the Draft, or through additional review of the original material by the authors. 8 Table 5.23-1 provides corrections to information presented in the Draft Solar PEIS.

9

Final Solar PEIS

5-33

July 2012

PEIS Solar Final

1TABLE 5.23-1 Errata to Chapter 5 (Impacts of Solar Energy Development and Potential Mitigation Measures) of the Draft Solar PEIS

Section No.

Page No.

Line No.

Figure No.

Table No.

Correction

5.4.2.1.1

5-12

32

 

 

The following sentence should be added to the end of the paragraph: “The effects of

 

 

 

 

 

these construction activities include potential loss of forage and displacement of

 

 

 

 

 

wild horses and burros from preferred habitats.”

5.4.2.3

5-13

15–16

 

 

“access to water sources” should read “retention of wild horse and burro access to

 

 

 

 

 

water resources.”

5.7.1

5-20 to

 

 

5.7-1

Note that for each entry in this table, all of the resources listed in the last column,

 

5-21

 

 

 

“Resources Affected by Soil Impact,” are affected by all the activities listed in the

 

 

 

 

 

second column, “Impacting Project Activities.” The format in the Draft Solar PEIS

 

 

 

 

 

is somewhat misleading in that it appears that one activity affects only one resource

 

 

 

 

 

(because each line is separated by a space).

34-5

2012 July

2

5.7.25-27 23

5.7.4.25-35 28

5.10.2.1.15-73 45

5.10.2.1.25-74 24

5.10.2.1.35-81 2

5.10.2.1.3 5-82 23

A parenthetical phrase “(for the same electricity production)” should be added to the end of the sentence on this line.

The “).” at the end of the sentence has no meaning and should be deleted.

The word “could” should be replaced with “would.”

The word “animals” should be replaced with “species.”

The following sentence should be added to the end of the paragraph:

“Section 5.10.3.1.3 discusses the potential impact of polarized light reflected off of solar panels on aquatic insects.”

The first sentence should read: “Night lighting could also disturb wildlife in the solar energy project area (e.g., alter reproductive activities, predator/prey interactions, and orientation capabilities) (Longcore and Rich 2004; Navara and Nelson 2007).”

PEIS Solar Final

35-5

2012 July

TABLE 5.23-1 (Cont.)

Section No.

Page No.

Line No.

Figure No.

Table No.

Correction

5.10.2.1.4

5-85

28

 

 

Delete: “In the extreme.”

5.10.2.1.5

5-85

35

 

 

The section title should read as, “5.10.2.1.5 Transmission Lines.”

5.10.2.1.6

5-90 to

 

 

5.10-2

The column heading “Expected Relative Impact for Different Plant Communities”

 

5-96

 

 

 

should read as, “Expected Relative Impact for Different Wildlife Groups.”

5.10.5

5-126 to

 

 

 

Each mention of “crucial wildlife habitats” should be followed by “and linkages.”

 

5-144

 

 

 

The resulting phrase should state “crucial wildlife habitats and linkages.”

5.10.5.1

5-127

9

 

 

“and linkagesshould be added after “wildlife habitats.”

5.10.5.1

5-127

23

 

 

The following sentence should be added: Pre-disturbance surveys should be

 

 

 

 

 

designed with seasonal and other life-history constraints in mind to ensure that they

 

 

 

 

 

are conducted during periods of optimum detection of the ecological resources

 

 

 

 

 

being investigated.”

5.10.5.1

5-128

23

 

 

The following mitigation measure should be deleted: Plant species that would

 

 

 

 

 

attract wildlife should not be planted along high-speed or high-traffic roads.”

5.10.5.1

5-128

31–34

 

 

The following mitigation measure should be deleted: “If cattle guards are identified

 

 

 

 

 

for the design for new roads, they should be wildlife friendly. To the extent

 

 

 

 

 

practicable, improvements should be made to existing ways and trails that require

 

 

 

 

 

cattle to pass through existing fences, fence-line gates, new gates, and standard wire

 

 

 

 

 

gates alongside them.”

5.10.5.3

5-137

23

 

 

Species that would attract wildlife should not be planted along high-speed or high-

 

 

 

 

 

traffic roads.

5.10.5.3

5-137

19

 

 

“sage-grouse” should be changed to “sage grouse.”

PEIS Solar Final

36-5

2012 July

TABLE 5.23-1 (Cont.)

Section No.

Page No.

Line No.

Figure No.

Table No.

Correction

5.11

All

 

 

 

In discussing CO2 emissions, the Draft Solar PEIS used terminology referring to

 

 

 

 

 

“displaced” emissions, e.g.: “CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel-fired power plants

 

 

 

 

 

could be displaced by solar facilities.” Throughout Section 5.11, the term

 

 

 

 

 

“displaced” should be replaced with “avoided”, e.g.: “CO2 emissions from fossil-

 

 

 

 

 

fuel-fired power plants could be avoided by solar facilities.”

5.11.4

5-157

45

 

 

The following should be added to the end of the paragraph, “The actual magnitude

 

 

 

 

 

of emissions avoided would depend on many factors influencing the generation and

 

 

 

 

 

distribution of electricity. The estimates presented in this Final Solar PEIS

 

 

 

 

 

approximate the maximum values that could be achieved, because they assume full

 

 

 

 

 

build-out of each proposed SEZ.”

5.12

5-160

Text box

 

 

The following should be added to the last sentence under Viewer Distance and

 

 

 

 

 

Angle: “, and the full size, geometry, and various components of the project may be

 

 

 

 

 

more apparent.”

5.12

5-162

46

 

 

“Light pollution” should be changed to “Facility and vehicle lighting that causes

 

 

 

 

 

light pollution at night.”

5.12

5-163

28–30

 

 

“This zone includes areas beyond 15 mi [24 km] or where only the form or outline

 

 

 

 

 

of the project can be seen or the project cannot be seen at all (BLM 1986a) should

 

 

 

 

 

read as, “This zone includes areas that are not visible within the foreground-

 

 

 

 

 

middleground and background zones, and areas beyond the background zone

 

 

 

 

 

(BLM 1986a).”

5.12

5-164

6

 

 

“and omissions” should be added.

5.12

5-164

8

 

 

“Detailed” should be changed to “More detailed.”

5.12

5-164

19

 

 

“would include” should be changed to “could account for.”

5.12

5-165

21

 

 

“the distance to the facilities were short” should be deleted.

PEIS Solar Final

37-5

2012 July

TABLE 5.23-1 (Cont.)

Section No.

Page No.

Line No.

Figure No.

Table No.

Correction

5.12.1.3.1

5-169

15

 

 

“, making the facility’s size and strong regular geometry more apparent” should be

 

 

 

 

 

added after “visible.”

5.12.1.5

5-174

14

 

 

“if they exceeded 200 ft (m) in height, although towers this tall are unusual” should

 

 

 

 

 

be added after “lights.”

5.12.2.1.1

5-176

22

 

 

“2010” should be “2012b.”

5.12.2.1.1

5-179

16

 

 

“2010” should be “2012b.”

5.12.2.1.1

5-179

21

 

 

“2010” should be “2012b.”

5.12.2.1.1

5-179

23

 

 

“2010” should be “2012b.”

5.12.2.1.1

5-182

9

 

 

“2010” should be “2012b.”

5.12.2.3

5-184

4

 

 

“potentially” should be added after “are.”

5.12.2.3

5-186

9

 

 

“2010” should be “2012b.”

5.12.2.3

5-186

20

 

 

“2010” should be “2012b.”

5.12.2.3

5-187

5

 

 

“up to” should be changed to “more than.”

5.12.2.5

5-191

12

 

 

“2010” should be”2012b.”

5.12.2.5

5-191

13

 

 

“thin film” should be added before “PV.”

5.12.2.5

5-191

15–16

 

 

The following should be deleted: “In addition, the apparent color of the panels

 

 

 

 

 

varied from black to gray to silvery white, depending on viewer location and other

 

 

 

 

 

visibility factors.”

PEIS Solar Final

1

38-5

2012 July

TABLE 5.23-1 (Cont.)

Section No.

Page No.

Line No.

Figure No.

Table No.

Correction

5.15.3

5-220

Footnote

 

 

The footnote on the PA incorrectly states that the National Council of State Historic

 

 

7

 

 

Preservation Officers (SHPOs) is a party to the Solar Programmatic Agreement; the

 

 

 

 

 

text should be revised to state “A PA specific to solar development on BLM-

 

 

 

 

 

administered lands is being negotiated among the BLM, the six individual SHPOs,

 

 

 

 

 

and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP).