- •VOLUME 1 CONTENTS
- •NOTATION
- •ENGLISH/METRIC AND METRIC/ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS
- •EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- •ES.1 Background
- •ES.2 BLM Proposed Action
- •ES.2.1 BLM Purpose and Need
- •ES.2.2 BLM Scope of Analysis
- •ES.2.3 Applications for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •ES.2.4 BLM Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.3 Solar Energy Zone Program Alternative
- •ES.2.4.4 No Action Alternative
- •ES.2.4.5 Reasonably Foreseeable Solar Energy Development
- •ES.2.4.6 Summary of Impacts of BLM’s Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.7 BLM’s Preferred Alternative
- •ES.3 DOE Proposed Action
- •ES.3.1 DOE Purpose and Need
- •ES.3.2 DOE Scope of Analysis
- •ES.3.3 DOE Alternatives
- •ES.3.3.2 No Action Alternative
- •ES.3.4 Summary of Impacts of DOE’s Alternatives
- •ES.4 Public Involvement, Consultation, and Coordination
- •ES.5 References
- •1 INTRODUCTION
- •1.1 Applicable Federal Orders and Mandates
- •1.1.1 Executive Order 13212
- •1.1.2 Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •1.1.3 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
- •1.1.4 DOI Secretarial Order 3285A1
- •1.1.5 Executive Order 13514
- •1.1.6 DOI Secretarial Order 3297
- •1.3 BLM Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.3.1 BLM’s Purpose and Need
- •1.3.2 BLM Decisions To Be Made
- •1.3.3 Authorization Process for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •1.3.3.1 New Applications
- •1.3.3.2 Pending Applications
- •1.3.3.3 Approved Applications
- •1.3.4 BLM Land Use Planning Process
- •1.3.5 BLM Scope of the Analysis
- •1.3.5.1 Program Analysis Versus SEZ-Specific Analysis
- •1.3.6 BLM Planning Criteria
- •1.4 DOE Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.4.1 DOE’s Purpose and Need
- •1.4.2 DOE Decisions To Be Made
- •1.4.3 DOE Scope of the Analysis
- •1.5 Cooperating Agencies
- •1.6.1 Renewable Portfolio Standards and Other Regional and State Initiatives
- •1.6.2 Related Initiatives
- •1.6.2.1 Energy Corridor Designation
- •1.6.2.3 California Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
- •1.6.2.4 Arizona Restoration Design Energy Project
- •1.6.2.5 Wind Energy Development PEIS
- •1.6.2.6 Geothermal PEIS
- •1.8 References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 BLM Alternatives
- •2.2.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •2.2.1.1 Right-of-Way Authorization Policies
- •2.2.1.2 Monitoring, Adaptive Management, and Mitigation
- •2.2.1.3 Design Features
- •2.2.1.4 Segregation of Lands with Potential for Solar Development
- •2.2.2.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.2.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.2.3 Proposed Variance Areas for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development
- •2.2.2.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.2.3 SEZ Program Alternative
- •2.2.3.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.3.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.3.3 Solar Energy Zone Policies
- •2.2.3.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.3 DOE Alternatives
- •2.3.1 No Action Alternative
- •2.3.2 Action Alternative—DOE’s Proposed Programmatic Environmental Guidance
- •2.3.2.1 General Mitigation Measures
- •2.3.2.2 Institutional and Public Outreach
- •2.3.2.3 Land Use
- •2.3.2.4 Water Resources and Erosion Control
- •2.3.2.5 Biological Resources
- •2.3.2.6 Air Quality
- •2.3.2.7 Cultural Resources and Native American Interactions
- •2.3.2.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetics
- •2.3.2.9 Socioeconomics
- •2.3.2.10 Environmental Justice
- •2.3.2.11 Safety and Health
- •2.4 Description of Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario
- •2.4.1 Comparison of RFDS with Lands Available under the Action Alternatives
- •2.5 Other Alternatives and Issues Considered
- •2.5.1 Distributed Generation
- •2.5.2 Conservation and Demand-Side Management
- •2.5.3 Analysis of Life-Cycle Impacts of Solar Energy Development
- •2.5.4 Analysis of Development on Other Federal, State, or Private Lands
- •2.5.5 Restricting Development to Previously Disturbed Lands
- •2.5.6 Restricting Development to Populated Areas
- •2.5.7 Restricting Development to the Fast-Track Project Applications
- •2.5.8 Analysis of Development on the Maximum Amount of Public Lands Allowable
- •2.5.9 Changes to BLM’s Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.5.10 Other Suggested Alternatives
- •2.5.11 DOE Environmental Requirements
- •2.6 References
- •3.1 Technologies
- •3.2 Development Process Overview for All Technologies
- •3.2.1 Site Characterization
- •3.2.2 Site Preparation and Construction
- •3.2.3 Operations
- •3.2.4 Decommissioning and Reclamation
- •3.2.5 Transmission Facilities
- •3.4 Transportation Considerations
- •3.6 Health and Safety Aspects of Solar Energy Projects
- •3.7 Existing Agency Processes and Guidance
- •3.8 References
- •4 UPDATE TO AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Lands and Realty
- •4.4 Rangeland Resources
- •4.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •4.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •4.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •4.5 Recreation
- •4.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •4.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •4.7.1 Geologic Setting
- •4.7.2 Geologic Hazards
- •4.7.3 Soil Resources
- •4.8 Minerals
- •4.9 Water Resources
- •4.9.1 Surface Water Resources
- •4.9.2 Groundwater Resources
- •4.9.3 Water Rights, Supply, and Use
- •4.10 Ecological Resources
- •4.10.1 Vegetation
- •4.10.2 Wildlife
- •4.10.3 Aquatic Biota
- •4.10.3.1 Pacific Northwest Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.2 Lower Colorado, Rio Grande, and Great Basin Hydrologic Regions
- •4.10.3.3 California Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.4 Upper Colorado River Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.5 Missouri River Basin Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.4 Special Status Species
- •4.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •4.11.3 Update to Section 4.11.2.4 of the Draft Solar PEIS: Visibility Protection
- •4.11.4 Update to Section 4.11.2.5 of the Draft Solar PEIS: General Conformity
- •4.11.5 Addition of New Section 4.11.4: Toxic Dust and Snowmelt
- •4.12 Visual Resources
- •4.13 Acoustic Environment
- •4.14 Paleontological Resources
- •4.15 Cultural Resources
- •4.16 Native American Concerns
- •4.17 Socioeconomics
- •4.18 Environmental Justice
- •4.19 References
- •4.20 Errata to Chapter 4 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Lands and Realty
- •5.4 Rangeland Resources
- •5.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •5.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •5.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •5.5 Recreation
- •5.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •5.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •5.8 Minerals
- •5.9 Water Resources
- •5.10 Ecological Resources
- •5.10.1 Vegetation
- •5.10.2 Wildlife
- •5.10.3 Aquatic Biota and Habitats
- •5.10.3.1 Common Impacts
- •5.10.3.2 Technology-Specific Impacts
- •5.10.4 Special Status Species
- •5.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •5.11.1 Common Impacts
- •5.11.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.11.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.11.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.11.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.12 Visual Resources
- •5.13 Acoustic Environment
- •5.13.1 Common Impacts
- •5.13.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.13.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.13.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.13.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.14 Paleontological Resources
- •5.15 Cultural Resources
- •5.15.1 Common Impacts
- •5.16 Native American Concerns
- •5.17 Socioeconomics
- •5.18 Environmental Justice
- •5.19 Transportation
- •5.20 Hazardous Materials and Waste
- •5.21 Health and Safety
- •5.22 References
- •5.23 Errata to Chapter 5 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •6 ANALYSIS OF BLM’S SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
- •6.1.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.1.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.1.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.1.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.1.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.1.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.2 Impacts of the SEZ Program Alternative
- •6.2.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.2.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.2.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.2.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.2.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.2.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •6.3.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.3.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.3.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.3.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.3.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.3.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5 Cumulative Impacts
- •6.5.1 Overview of Activities in the Six-State Study Area
- •6.5.1.1 Energy Production and Distribution
- •6.5.1.2 Other Activities and Trends
- •6.5.2 Cumulative Impact Assessment for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5.2.1 Lands and Realty
- •6.5.2.2 Specially Designated Areas and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics
- •6.5.2.3 Rangeland Resources
- •6.5.2.4 Recreation
- •6.5.2.5 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •6.5.2.6 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •6.5.2.7 Mineral Resources
- •6.5.2.8 Water Resources
- •6.5.2.9 Ecological Resources
- •6.5.2.10 Air Quality and Climate
- •6.5.2.11 Visual Resources
- •6.5.2.12 Acoustic Environment
- •6.5.2.13 Paleontological Resources
- •6.5.2.14 Cultural Resources
- •6.5.2.15 Native American Concerns
- •6.5.2.16 Socioeconomics
- •6.5.2.17 Environmental Justice
- •6.5.2.18 Transportation
- •6.6 Other NEPA Considerations
- •6.6.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •6.6.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •6.6.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •6.6.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •6.7 References
- •7 ANALYSIS OF DOE’S ALTERNATIVES
- •7.1 Impacts of DOE’s Proposed Action
- •7.2 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •7.3 Cumulative Impacts
- •7.4 Other NEPA Considerations
- •7.4.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •7.4.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •7.4.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •7.4.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •14.1 Public Scoping and Public Outreach
- •14.2 Government-to-Government Consultation
- •14.3 Coordination of BLM State and Field Offices
- •14.4 Agency Cooperation, Consultation, and Coordination
- •14.5 References
- •15 LIST OF PREPARERS
- •16 GLOSSARY
- •FIGURE ES.2-1 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •FIGURE ES.2-4 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 1.2-2 Solar Direct Normal Insolation Levels in the Southwestern United States
- •FIGURE 2.2-3 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 2.2-7 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •TABLE ES.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE ES.2-5 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE ES.2-6 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agency’s Action
- •TABLE 2.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE 4.15-3 ACECs Designated for Protection of Cultural Resource Values That Are near BLM-Administered Lands Available for Application through the Variance Process
- •TABLE 6.1-2 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE 6.4-1 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agencies’ Action
- •TABLE 6.5-10 Recreational Visits for the BLM and NPS in FY 2000 and FY 2010 and for USFS in FY 2000 and FY 2010
1[40 CFR Parts 1500–1508]), and applicable BLM and DOE authorities.2 Programmatic NEPA
2analyses are broadly scoped analyses that assess the environmental impacts of federal actions
3 across a span of conditions, such as facility types, geographic regions, or multiproject programs. 4 The BLM and DOE have prepared this document in accordance with NEPA, as amended; the
5 CEQ regulations for implementing NEPA cited above; the DOI and DOE regulations for 6 implementing NEPA (43 CFR Part 46 and 10 CFR Part 1021, respectively); as well as the
7 Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) (United States Code, Title 43, 8 Section 1701 et seq. [43 USC 1701 et seq.]), as amended.
9
10The following sections provide information about applicable federal orders and
11mandates; solar energy technologies and resources evaluated in the scope of this PEIS; the
12objectives, requirements, and scope of analyses for the BLM and DOE; the participation of
13cooperating agencies; the relationship of the proposed programs and strategies evaluated by this
14PEIS to other programs, policies, and plans; and the organization of the PEIS chapters and
15appendices.
16
17
18 1.1 APPLICABLE FEDERAL ORDERS AND MANDATES
19
20The following orders and mandates, presented in chronological order, establish
21requirements for the BLM and/or DOE related to renewable energy development. They provide
22the drivers for specific actions being taken or being proposed by these agencies to facilitate solar
23energy development.
24
25
26 1.1.1 Executive Order 13212
27
28On May 18, 2001, the President signed E.O. 13212, “Actions to Expedite Energy-Related
29Projects,” which states that “the increased production and transmission of energy in a safe and
30environmentally sound manner is essential” (Federal Register, Volume 66, page 28357,
31May 22, 2001]). Executive departments and agencies are directed to “take appropriate actions, to
32the extent consistent with applicable law, to expedite projects that will increase the production,
33transmission, or conservation of energy.” Executive Order 13212 further states that “For energy-
34related projects, agencies shall expedite their review of permits or take other actions as necessary
35to accelerate the completion of such projects, while maintaining safety, public health, and
36environmental protections. The agencies shall take such actions to the extent permitted by law
37and regulation and where appropriate.”
38
39
40
2For the BLM, these authorities include the BLM’s NEPA Handbook (BLM 2008), DOI’s NEPA Implementing Procedures (43 CFR Part 46), and Chapter 11 of the DOI’s Departmental Manual (DM) 516 (DOI 2008). For DOE, these authorities include DOE’s NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021) and the Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements (10 CFR Part 1022).
Final Solar PEIS |
1-2 |
July 2012 |
1 1.1.2 Energy Policy Act of 2005
2
3On August 8, 2005, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law [P.L.] 109-58) was
4 signed into law. Section 211 of the Act states, “It is the sense of the Congress that the Secretary 5 of the Interior should, before the end of the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 6 this Act, seek to have approved non-hydropower renewable energy projects located on the public 7 lands with a generation capacity of at least 10,000 megawatts of electricity.” To date, the BLM 8 has approved 43 geothermal projects with a total generation capacity of 1,350 megawatts (MW), 9 32 wind projects with a total capacity of 1,221 MW, and 11 solar projects with a total capacity of 10 4,512 MW. Other applications that are being processed could contribute to this goal.
11
12
13 1.1.3 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
14
15On December 19, 2007, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA)
16(P.L. 110-140) was signed into law. Section 603 of the EISA requires DOE to assess methods
17to integrate electric power generated at utility-scale solar facilities into regional electricity
18transmission systems and to identify transmission system expansions and upgrades needed
19to move solar-generated electricity to growing electricity demand centers throughout the
20United States. In addition, this section requires DOE to consider methods to reduce the amount
21of water consumed by concentrating solar power (CSP) systems.
22
23
24 1.1.4 DOI Secretarial Order 3285A1
25
26On March 11, 2009, the Secretary of the Interior issued Secretarial Order 3285, which
27announced a policy goal of identifying and prioritizing specific locations best suited for large-
28scale production of solar energy on public lands (Secretary of the Interior 2009). The Secretarial
29Order requires DOI agencies and bureaus to work collaboratively with each other and with other
30federal agencies, individual states, tribes, local governments, and other interested stakeholders,
31including renewable energy generators and transmission and distribution utilities, to encourage
32the timely and responsible development of renewable energy and associated transmission, while
33protecting and enhancing the nation’s water, wildlife, and other natural resources; to identify
34appropriate areas for generation and necessary transmission; to develop best management
35practices for renewable energy and transmission projects on public lands to ensure the most
36environmentally responsible development and delivery of renewable energy; and to establish
37clear policy direction for authorizing the development of solar energy on public lands. On
38February 22, 2010, Secretarial Order 3285 was amended to clarify Departmental roles and
39responsibilities in prioritizing development of renewable energy. The amended order is referred
40to as Secretarial Order 3285A1 (Secretary of the Interior 2010a).
41
42The BLM, consistent with Secretarial Order 3285A1, is seeking to establish a
43comprehensive Solar Energy Program through the Solar PEIS that would allow the permitting of
44solar energy development projects on public lands to proceed in an efficient, standardized, and
45environmentally responsible manner, including the identification of areas best suited for utility-
46scale solar development. As a land management agency with a multiple-use mission, the BLM
Final Solar PEIS |
1-3 |
July 2012 |
1must make land use decisions that sustain the health and productivity of the public lands for
2the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The BLM recognizes that the
3 six southwestern states included in the Solar PEIS study area are rich in values and resources, 4 which may limit the placement of solar facilities and their related infrastructure. The BLM also 5 recognizes that for solar energy development to be successful, it must be consistent with the
6protection of other important areas, including units of the National Park System, National
7Wildlife Refuges (NWRs), and other specially designated areas. Such resource areas include
8almost 70 NWRs, more than 60 national park areas, and about 50 national forests, as well as
9 hundreds of miles of national scenic and historic trail corridors. All of these areas were created 10 under federal law as nationally significant resource areas.
11
12
13 1.1.5 Executive Order 13514
14
15On October 5, 2009, the President signed E.O. 13514, “Federal Leadership
16in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance,” which requires that federal agencies
17take efforts to align their policies to advance local planning efforts for energy development,
18including renewable energy (Federal Register, Volume 74, page 52117, Oct. 5, 2009).
19Specifically, the order states that agencies shall “…advance regional and local integrated
20planning by…aligning Federal policies to increase the effectiveness of local planning for
21energy choices such as locally generated renewable energy.”
22
23
24 1.1.6 DOI Secretarial Order 3297
25
26On February 22, 2010, the Secretary of the Interior issued Secretarial Order 3297, which
27announced a new water sustainability strategy that centers on protecting water supplies by
28establishing federal leadership and assistance on the efficient use of water, integrating water and
29energy policies to support the sustainable use of all natural resources, and coordinating the water
30conservation activities of the various DOI bureaus and offices (Secretary of the Interior 2010b).
31The Secretarial Order acknowledges that water plays an important role in the development of
32both conventional and renewable energy and requires bureaus to develop criteria that identify
33and support projects and actions that promote sustainable water strategies.
34
35The BLM, consistent with Secretarial Order 3297, recognizes that solar energy
36development may affect water supplies and will examine the water impacts associated with
37proposed development on a site-specific basis utilizing the guidance provided in this Solar PEIS.
401.2 OVERVIEW OF SOLAR ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND RESOURCES
41CONSIDERED IN THE PEIS
42
43The scope of the PEIS includes analyses of the use of multiple solar energy technologies
44at utility scale over the next 20 years on lands within six southwestern states—Arizona,
45California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah—where the solar energy resources are
46among the best in the United States.
Final Solar PEIS |
1-4 |
July 2012 |
