- •VOLUME 1 CONTENTS
- •NOTATION
- •ENGLISH/METRIC AND METRIC/ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS
- •EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- •ES.1 Background
- •ES.2 BLM Proposed Action
- •ES.2.1 BLM Purpose and Need
- •ES.2.2 BLM Scope of Analysis
- •ES.2.3 Applications for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •ES.2.4 BLM Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.3 Solar Energy Zone Program Alternative
- •ES.2.4.4 No Action Alternative
- •ES.2.4.5 Reasonably Foreseeable Solar Energy Development
- •ES.2.4.6 Summary of Impacts of BLM’s Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.7 BLM’s Preferred Alternative
- •ES.3 DOE Proposed Action
- •ES.3.1 DOE Purpose and Need
- •ES.3.2 DOE Scope of Analysis
- •ES.3.3 DOE Alternatives
- •ES.3.3.2 No Action Alternative
- •ES.3.4 Summary of Impacts of DOE’s Alternatives
- •ES.4 Public Involvement, Consultation, and Coordination
- •ES.5 References
- •1 INTRODUCTION
- •1.1 Applicable Federal Orders and Mandates
- •1.1.1 Executive Order 13212
- •1.1.2 Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •1.1.3 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
- •1.1.4 DOI Secretarial Order 3285A1
- •1.1.5 Executive Order 13514
- •1.1.6 DOI Secretarial Order 3297
- •1.3 BLM Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.3.1 BLM’s Purpose and Need
- •1.3.2 BLM Decisions To Be Made
- •1.3.3 Authorization Process for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •1.3.3.1 New Applications
- •1.3.3.2 Pending Applications
- •1.3.3.3 Approved Applications
- •1.3.4 BLM Land Use Planning Process
- •1.3.5 BLM Scope of the Analysis
- •1.3.5.1 Program Analysis Versus SEZ-Specific Analysis
- •1.3.6 BLM Planning Criteria
- •1.4 DOE Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.4.1 DOE’s Purpose and Need
- •1.4.2 DOE Decisions To Be Made
- •1.4.3 DOE Scope of the Analysis
- •1.5 Cooperating Agencies
- •1.6.1 Renewable Portfolio Standards and Other Regional and State Initiatives
- •1.6.2 Related Initiatives
- •1.6.2.1 Energy Corridor Designation
- •1.6.2.3 California Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
- •1.6.2.4 Arizona Restoration Design Energy Project
- •1.6.2.5 Wind Energy Development PEIS
- •1.6.2.6 Geothermal PEIS
- •1.8 References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 BLM Alternatives
- •2.2.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •2.2.1.1 Right-of-Way Authorization Policies
- •2.2.1.2 Monitoring, Adaptive Management, and Mitigation
- •2.2.1.3 Design Features
- •2.2.1.4 Segregation of Lands with Potential for Solar Development
- •2.2.2.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.2.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.2.3 Proposed Variance Areas for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development
- •2.2.2.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.2.3 SEZ Program Alternative
- •2.2.3.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.3.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.3.3 Solar Energy Zone Policies
- •2.2.3.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.3 DOE Alternatives
- •2.3.1 No Action Alternative
- •2.3.2 Action Alternative—DOE’s Proposed Programmatic Environmental Guidance
- •2.3.2.1 General Mitigation Measures
- •2.3.2.2 Institutional and Public Outreach
- •2.3.2.3 Land Use
- •2.3.2.4 Water Resources and Erosion Control
- •2.3.2.5 Biological Resources
- •2.3.2.6 Air Quality
- •2.3.2.7 Cultural Resources and Native American Interactions
- •2.3.2.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetics
- •2.3.2.9 Socioeconomics
- •2.3.2.10 Environmental Justice
- •2.3.2.11 Safety and Health
- •2.4 Description of Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario
- •2.4.1 Comparison of RFDS with Lands Available under the Action Alternatives
- •2.5 Other Alternatives and Issues Considered
- •2.5.1 Distributed Generation
- •2.5.2 Conservation and Demand-Side Management
- •2.5.3 Analysis of Life-Cycle Impacts of Solar Energy Development
- •2.5.4 Analysis of Development on Other Federal, State, or Private Lands
- •2.5.5 Restricting Development to Previously Disturbed Lands
- •2.5.6 Restricting Development to Populated Areas
- •2.5.7 Restricting Development to the Fast-Track Project Applications
- •2.5.8 Analysis of Development on the Maximum Amount of Public Lands Allowable
- •2.5.9 Changes to BLM’s Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.5.10 Other Suggested Alternatives
- •2.5.11 DOE Environmental Requirements
- •2.6 References
- •3.1 Technologies
- •3.2 Development Process Overview for All Technologies
- •3.2.1 Site Characterization
- •3.2.2 Site Preparation and Construction
- •3.2.3 Operations
- •3.2.4 Decommissioning and Reclamation
- •3.2.5 Transmission Facilities
- •3.4 Transportation Considerations
- •3.6 Health and Safety Aspects of Solar Energy Projects
- •3.7 Existing Agency Processes and Guidance
- •3.8 References
- •4 UPDATE TO AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Lands and Realty
- •4.4 Rangeland Resources
- •4.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •4.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •4.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •4.5 Recreation
- •4.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •4.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •4.7.1 Geologic Setting
- •4.7.2 Geologic Hazards
- •4.7.3 Soil Resources
- •4.8 Minerals
- •4.9 Water Resources
- •4.9.1 Surface Water Resources
- •4.9.2 Groundwater Resources
- •4.9.3 Water Rights, Supply, and Use
- •4.10 Ecological Resources
- •4.10.1 Vegetation
- •4.10.2 Wildlife
- •4.10.3 Aquatic Biota
- •4.10.3.1 Pacific Northwest Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.2 Lower Colorado, Rio Grande, and Great Basin Hydrologic Regions
- •4.10.3.3 California Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.4 Upper Colorado River Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.5 Missouri River Basin Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.4 Special Status Species
- •4.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •4.11.3 Update to Section 4.11.2.4 of the Draft Solar PEIS: Visibility Protection
- •4.11.4 Update to Section 4.11.2.5 of the Draft Solar PEIS: General Conformity
- •4.11.5 Addition of New Section 4.11.4: Toxic Dust and Snowmelt
- •4.12 Visual Resources
- •4.13 Acoustic Environment
- •4.14 Paleontological Resources
- •4.15 Cultural Resources
- •4.16 Native American Concerns
- •4.17 Socioeconomics
- •4.18 Environmental Justice
- •4.19 References
- •4.20 Errata to Chapter 4 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Lands and Realty
- •5.4 Rangeland Resources
- •5.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •5.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •5.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •5.5 Recreation
- •5.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •5.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •5.8 Minerals
- •5.9 Water Resources
- •5.10 Ecological Resources
- •5.10.1 Vegetation
- •5.10.2 Wildlife
- •5.10.3 Aquatic Biota and Habitats
- •5.10.3.1 Common Impacts
- •5.10.3.2 Technology-Specific Impacts
- •5.10.4 Special Status Species
- •5.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •5.11.1 Common Impacts
- •5.11.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.11.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.11.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.11.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.12 Visual Resources
- •5.13 Acoustic Environment
- •5.13.1 Common Impacts
- •5.13.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.13.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.13.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.13.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.14 Paleontological Resources
- •5.15 Cultural Resources
- •5.15.1 Common Impacts
- •5.16 Native American Concerns
- •5.17 Socioeconomics
- •5.18 Environmental Justice
- •5.19 Transportation
- •5.20 Hazardous Materials and Waste
- •5.21 Health and Safety
- •5.22 References
- •5.23 Errata to Chapter 5 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •6 ANALYSIS OF BLM’S SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
- •6.1.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.1.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.1.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.1.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.1.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.1.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.2 Impacts of the SEZ Program Alternative
- •6.2.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.2.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.2.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.2.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.2.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.2.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •6.3.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.3.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.3.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.3.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.3.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.3.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5 Cumulative Impacts
- •6.5.1 Overview of Activities in the Six-State Study Area
- •6.5.1.1 Energy Production and Distribution
- •6.5.1.2 Other Activities and Trends
- •6.5.2 Cumulative Impact Assessment for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5.2.1 Lands and Realty
- •6.5.2.2 Specially Designated Areas and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics
- •6.5.2.3 Rangeland Resources
- •6.5.2.4 Recreation
- •6.5.2.5 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •6.5.2.6 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •6.5.2.7 Mineral Resources
- •6.5.2.8 Water Resources
- •6.5.2.9 Ecological Resources
- •6.5.2.10 Air Quality and Climate
- •6.5.2.11 Visual Resources
- •6.5.2.12 Acoustic Environment
- •6.5.2.13 Paleontological Resources
- •6.5.2.14 Cultural Resources
- •6.5.2.15 Native American Concerns
- •6.5.2.16 Socioeconomics
- •6.5.2.17 Environmental Justice
- •6.5.2.18 Transportation
- •6.6 Other NEPA Considerations
- •6.6.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •6.6.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •6.6.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •6.6.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •6.7 References
- •7 ANALYSIS OF DOE’S ALTERNATIVES
- •7.1 Impacts of DOE’s Proposed Action
- •7.2 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •7.3 Cumulative Impacts
- •7.4 Other NEPA Considerations
- •7.4.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •7.4.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •7.4.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •7.4.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •14.1 Public Scoping and Public Outreach
- •14.2 Government-to-Government Consultation
- •14.3 Coordination of BLM State and Field Offices
- •14.4 Agency Cooperation, Consultation, and Coordination
- •14.5 References
- •15 LIST OF PREPARERS
- •16 GLOSSARY
- •FIGURE ES.2-1 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •FIGURE ES.2-4 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 1.2-2 Solar Direct Normal Insolation Levels in the Southwestern United States
- •FIGURE 2.2-3 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 2.2-7 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •TABLE ES.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE ES.2-5 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE ES.2-6 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agency’s Action
- •TABLE 2.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE 4.15-3 ACECs Designated for Protection of Cultural Resource Values That Are near BLM-Administered Lands Available for Application through the Variance Process
- •TABLE 6.1-2 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE 6.4-1 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agencies’ Action
- •TABLE 6.5-10 Recreational Visits for the BLM and NPS in FY 2000 and FY 2010 and for USFS in FY 2000 and FY 2010
1 |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
2 |
|
3 |
ES.1 BACKGROUND |
4 |
|
5 |
|
6The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and
7U.S Department of Energy (DOE) have jointly prepared this programmatic environmental impact
8statement (PEIS) to evaluate actions that the agencies are considering taking to further facilitate
9utility-scale solar energy development in six southwestern states (Arizona, California, Colorado,
10Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah).1 For the BLM, this includes the evaluation of a new Solar
11Energy Program applicable to solar development on BLM-administered lands. For DOE, it
12includes the evaluation of developing new guidance to further facilitate utility-scale solar energy
13development and maximize the mitigation of associated environmental impacts. This Solar PEIS
14evaluates the potential environmental, social, and economic effects of the agencies’ proposed
15actions and alternatives in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
161969, the Council on Environmental Quality’s regulations for implementing NEPA (Title 40,
17Parts 1500–1508 of the Code of Federal Regulations [40 CFR Parts 1500–1508]), the DOI and
18DOE regulations for implementing NEPA (43 CFR Part 46 and 10 CFR Part 1021, respectively),
19and applicable BLM and DOE authorities.
20
21The BLM and DOE initiated the Solar PEIS process in May 2008. Since that time, the
22agencies have engaged extensively with their cooperating agencies, key stakeholders, and the
23general public to obtain input on the scope and objectives of their proposed actions. On the basis
24of this input, as appropriate, the agencies have incrementally refined their proposed actions,
25alternatives, and analyses. On December 17, 2010, the BLM and DOE published the Draft
26Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in
27Six Southwestern States (BLM and DOE 2010); the Notice of Availability (NOA) was published
28in the Federal Register, Volume 75, page 78980. During the comment period, the public, as well
29as many cooperating agencies and key stakeholders, offered suggestions on how the BLM and
30DOE could increase the utility of the analysis, strengthen elements of the BLM’s proposed Solar
31Energy Program, and increase certainty regarding solar energy development on BLM-
32administered lands. Subsequently, on October 28, 2011, the lead agencies published the
33Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS (BLM and DOE 2011), in which adjustments were made to
34elements of the proposed Solar Energy Program and to guidance for facilitating utility-scale solar
35energy development to better meet BLM and DOE’s solar energy objectives. The NOA for the
36Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS was published in the Federal Register, Volume 76,
37page 66958.
38
39
40 ES.2 BLM PROPOSED ACTION
41
42The BLM proposes to develop a new Solar Energy Program to further support utility-
43scale solar energy development on BLM-administered lands in the six-state study area. The
1Utility-scale facilities are defined as projects that generate electricity that is delivered into the electricity transmission grid, generally with capacities greater than 20 megawatts (MW)
Final Solar PEIS |
ES-1 |
July 2012 |
1proposed Solar Energy Program would replace certain elements of BLM’s existing solar energy
2policies with a comprehensive program that would allow the permitting of future solar energy
3development projects on public lands to proceed in a more efficient, standardized, and
4environmentally responsible manner. The proposed program would establish right-of-way
5(ROW) authorization policies and design features applicable to utility-scale solar energy
6development on BLM-administered lands. It would identify categories of lands to be excluded
7from utility-scale solar energy development and identify specific locations well suited for utility-
8scale production of solar energy where the BLM would prioritize development (i.e., solar energy
9zones, or SEZs). The proposed action would also allow for responsible utility-scale solar
10development on lands outside of priority areas.
11
12
13 ES.2.1 BLM Purpose and Need
14
15The BLM has identified a need to respond in a more efficient and effective manner to the
16high interest in siting utility-scale solar energy development on public lands and to ensure
17consistent application of measures to mitigate the potential adverse impacts of such
18development.
19
20The BLM is therefore considering replacing certain elements of its existing solar energy
21policies with a comprehensive Solar Energy Program. While the proposed Solar Energy Program
22will further BLM’s ability to meet the mandates of Executive Order (E.O.) 13212,“Actions to
23Expedite Energy-Related Projects” (Federal Register, Volume 66, page 28357, May 22, 2001),
24and the Energy Policy Act of 2005, it also has been designed to meet the requirements of DOI
25Secretarial Order 3285SA1 (Secretary of the Interior 2010) related to identifying and prioritizing
26specific locations best suited for utility-scale solar energy development on public lands
27(see Section 1.1 of this Final Solar PEIS for a discussion of these and other applicable federal
28orders and mandates).
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
The objectives of BLM’s proposed Solar Energy Program include the following: |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
• Facilitate near-term utility-scale solar energy development on public lands; |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
• Minimize potential negative environmental impacts; |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
36 |
• Minimize social and economic impacts; |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
• Provide flexibility to the solar industry to consider a variety of solar energy |
|
|
39 |
projects (location, facility size, technology, etc.); |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
• Optimize existing transmission infrastructure and corridors; |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
• Standardize and streamline the authorization process for utility-scale solar |
|
|
44 |
energy development on BLM-administered lands; and |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
• Meet projected demand for solar energy development. |
|
|
|
Final Solar PEIS |
ES-2 |
July 2012 |
1 |
The elements of BLM’s proposed Solar Energy Program include the following: |
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
1. |
Commitment to process pending applications for utility-scale solar energy |
4 |
|
development that meet due diligence and siting provisions under existing land |
5 |
|
use plans and other policies and procedures; |
6 |
|
|
7 |
2. |
Identification of lands to be excluded from utility-scale solar energy |
8 |
|
development in the six-state study area; |
9 |
|
|
10 |
3. |
Establishment of a process to identify new or expanded SEZs; |
11 |
|
|
12 |
4. |
Identification of priority areas (i.e., SEZs) that are well suited for utility-scale |
13 |
|
production of solar energy in accordance with the requirements of Secretarial |
14 |
|
Order 3285A1 and the associated authorization procedures for applications in |
15 |
|
these areas; |
16 |
|
|
17 |
5. |
Establishment of a process that allows for responsible utility-scale solar |
18 |
|
energy development outside of SEZs (i.e., variance process); |
19 |
|
|
20 |
6. |
Establishment of design features for solar energy development on public lands |
21 |
|
to ensure the most environmentally responsible development and delivery of |
22 |
|
solar energy; and |
23 |
|
|
24 |
7. |
Amendment of BLM land use plans in the six-state study area to adopt those |
25 |
|
elements of the new Solar Energy Program that pertain to planning. |
26 |
|
|
27 |
ES.2.2 BLM Scope of Analysis |
|
28 |
||
29 |
|
|
30The geographic scope of the PEIS for the BLM includes all BLM-administered lands in
31the six-state study area. The scope of the impact analysis includes an assessment of the potential
32environmental, social, and economic impacts of utility-scale solar facilities and required
33transmission connections from these facilities to the existing electricity transmission grid and
34other associated infrastructure such as roads over an approximately 20-year time frame (i.e., until
35about 2030).
36
37The scope of this analysis is limited to utility-scale solar energy development. For the
38purposes of the Solar PEIS and associated decision making, utility-scale solar energy
39development is defined as any project capable of generating 20 megawatts (MW) or more. As a
40result, BLM’s new Solar Energy Program would apply only to projects of this scale; decisions on
41projects that are less than 20 MW would continue to be made in accordance with existing land
Final Solar PEIS |
ES-3 |
July 2012 |
