- •Series Editor’s Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction
- •References
- •2.1 Methodological Introduction
- •2.2 Geographical Background
- •2.3 The Compelling History of Viticulture Terracing
- •2.4 How Water Made Wine
- •2.5 An Apparent Exception: The Wines of the Alps
- •2.6 Convergent Legacies
- •2.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •3.1 The State of the Art: A Growing Interest in the Last 20 Years
- •3.2 An Initial Survey on Extent, Distribution, and Land Use: The MAPTER Project
- •3.3.2 Quality Turn: Local, Artisanal, Different
- •3.3.4 Sociability to Tame Verticality
- •3.3.5 Landscape as a Theater: Aesthetic and Educational Values
- •References
- •4 Slovenian Terraced Landscapes
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Terraced Landscape Research in Slovenia
- •4.3 State of Terraced Landscapes in Slovenia
- •4.4 Integration of Terraced Landscapes into Spatial Planning and Cultural Heritage
- •4.5 Conclusion
- •Bibliography
- •Sources
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.3 The Model of the High Valleys of the Southern Massif Central, the Southern Alps, Castagniccia and the Pyrenees Orientals: Small Terraced Areas Associated with Immense Spaces of Extensive Agriculture
- •5.6 What is the Reality of Terraced Agriculture in France in 2017?
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Looking Back, Looking Forward
- •6.2.4 New Technologies
- •6.2.5 Policy Needs
- •6.3 Conclusions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Study Area
- •7.3 Methods
- •7.4 Characterization of the Terraces of La Gomera
- •7.4.1 Environmental Factors (Altitude, Slope, Lithology and Landforms)
- •7.4.2 Human Factors (Land Occupation and Protected Nature Areas)
- •7.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •8.1 Geographical Survey About Terraced Landscapes in Peru
- •8.2 Methodology
- •8.3 Threats to Terraced Landscapes in Peru
- •8.4 The Terrace Landscape Debate
- •8.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Australia
- •9.3 Survival Creativity and Dry Stones
- •9.4 Early 1800s Settlement
- •9.4.2 Gold Mines Walhalla West Gippsland Victoria
- •9.4.3 Goonawarra Vineyard Terraces Sunbury Victoria
- •9.6 Garden Walls Contemporary Terraces
- •9.7 Preservation and Regulations
- •9.8 Art, Craft, Survival and Creativity
- •Appendix 9.1
- •References
- •10 Agricultural Terraces in Mexico
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Traditional Agricultural Systems
- •10.3 The Agricultural Terraces
- •10.4 Terrace Distribution
- •10.4.1 Terraces in Tlaxcala
- •10.5 Terraces in the Basin of Mexico
- •10.6 Terraces in the Toluca Valley
- •10.7 Terraces in Oaxaca
- •10.8 Terraces in the Mayan Area
- •10.9 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Materials and Methods
- •11.2.1 Traditional Cartographic and Photo Analysis
- •11.2.2 Orthophoto
- •11.2.3 WMS and Geobrowser
- •11.2.4 LiDAR Survey
- •11.2.5 UAV Survey
- •11.3 Result and Discussion
- •11.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Case Study
- •12.2.1 Liguria: A Natural Laboratory for the Analysis of a Terraced Landscape
- •12.2.2 Land Abandonment and Landslides Occurrences
- •12.3 Terraced Landscape Management
- •12.3.1 Monitoring
- •12.3.2 Landscape Agronomic Approach
- •12.3.3 Maintenance
- •12.4 Final Remarks
- •References
- •13 Health, Seeds, Diversity and Terraces
- •13.1 Nutrition and Diseases
- •13.2 Climate Change and Health
- •13.3 Can We Have Both Cheap and Healthy Food?
- •13.4 Where the Seed Comes from?
- •13.5 The Case of Yemen
- •13.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Components and Features of the Satoyama and the Hani Terrace Landscape
- •14.4 Ecosystem Services of the Satoyama and the Hani Terrace Landscape
- •14.5 Challenges in the Satoyama and the Hani Terrace Landscape
- •References
- •15 Terraced Lands: From Put in Place to Put in Memory
- •15.2 Terraces, Landscapes, Societies
- •15.3 Country Planning: Lifestyles
- •15.4 What Is Important? The System
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Case Study: The Traditional Cultural Landscape of Olive Groves in Trevi (Italy)
- •16.2.1 Historical Overview of the Study Area
- •16.2.3 Structural and Technical Data of Olive Groves in the Municipality of Trevi
- •16.3 Materials and Methods
- •16.3.2 Participatory Planning Process
- •16.4 Results and Discussion
- •16.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •17.1 Towards a Circular Paradigm for the Regeneration of Terraced Landscapes
- •17.1.1 Circular Economy and Circularization of Processes
- •17.1.2 The Landscape Systemic Approach
- •17.1.3 The Complex Social Value of Cultural Terraced Landscape as Common Good
- •17.2 Evaluation Tools
- •17.2.1 Multidimensional Impacts of Land Abandonment in Terraced Landscapes
- •17.2.3 Economic Valuation Methods of ES
- •17.3 Some Economic Instruments
- •17.3.1 Applicability and Impact of Subsidy Policies in Terraced Landscapes
- •17.3.3 Payments for Ecosystem Services Promoting Sustainable Farming Practices
- •17.3.4 Pay for Action and Pay for Result Mechanisms
- •17.4 Conclusions and Discussion
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Tourism and Landscape: A Brief Theoretical Staging
- •18.3 Tourism Development in Terraced Landscapes: Attractions and Expectations
- •18.3.1 General Trends and Main Issues
- •18.3.2 The Demand Side
- •18.3.3 The Supply Side
- •18.3.4 Our Approach
- •18.4 Tourism and Local Agricultural System
- •18.6 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •19 Innovative Practices and Strategic Planning on Terraced Landscapes with a View to Building New Alpine Communities
- •19.1 Focusing on Practices
- •19.2 Terraces: A Resource for Building Community Awareness in the Alps
- •19.3 The Alto Canavese Case Study (Piedmont, Italy)
- •19.3.1 A Territory that Looks to a Future Based on Terraced Landscapes
- •19.3.2 The Community’s First Steps: The Practices that Enhance Terraces
- •19.3.3 The Role of Two Projects
- •19.3.3.1 The Strategic Plan
- •References
- •20 Planning, Policies and Governance for Terraced Landscape: A General View
- •20.1 Three Landscapes
- •20.2 Crisis and Opportunity
- •20.4 Planning, Policy and Governance Guidelines
- •Annex
- •Foreword
- •References
- •21.1 About Policies: Why Current Ones Do not Work?
- •21.2 What Landscape Observatories Are?
- •References
- •Index
268 |
B. Torquati et al. |
olive oil produced. Profitability would be ensured by the selling price of about €16/ kg, which would mean an increase in the current selling price by 7%. Such an increase could be easily achieved through a collective marketing policy.
16.5Conclusions
Combining spatial information on traditional terraced landscapes with socio-economic information on farms in which they are located has turned out to be an extremely useful analysis methodology to put the conservation of terraced landscapes into its economic context and assess the actions needed to protect them.
Similarly, the participatory planning process launched with the research has proven useful to identify which actions and measures would have been favourably accepted by olive growers. It also gave rise to team spirit among local stakeholders in dealing with a complex issue such as the conservation and promotion of traditional terraced landscapes.
The research shows that the vulnerability of terraced olive growing in the study area is mainly due to its lack of profitability. As mentioned by Palazzo and Aristone (2017), unavoidable trade-offs among identity and profitability ought to be implemented. Overcoming this major limitation requires a joint public and private effort. On the one hand, public institutions should provide direct funding and incentives. On the other hand, consumers should be more willing to pay a premium price for extra-virgin olive oil with landscaped value.
Numerous studies have been carried out on the subject. These studies have found a willingness to pay for attributes tied to different dimensions of agro-food production sustainability (Scarpa and Del Giudice 2004; Krystallis and Ness 2005; Tempesta et al. 2010; Moser and Raffaelli 2012; Vecchio and Annunziata 2015; Tait et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016).
To this end, further research should be conducted that analyses consumer preferences for extra-virgin olive oil with landscape-label-friendly certification. The estimation of the willingness to pay a premium price and identification of the central drivers of extra-virgin oil consumption with such a credence attribute could contribute to both shedding light on this under-investigated topic and supporting the farms’ marketing strategies.
The collective project for the restoration of dry-stone walls could be a sound basis for setting up a pathway to cooperation in olive cultivation, which in turn would entail a reduction of production costs. Another path to promote cooperation is represented by European projects and initiatives to revitalise rural areas, such as the LEADER Programme or the Operational Groups of the European Innovation Partnerships.
The favourable economic context of our study area has highlighted that issues related to traditional terraced landscapes also affect areas where several steps have been taken at the institutional level to promote agricultural products, starting from the PDO label. The nomination for inscription into UNESCO’s World Heritage List
16 Economic Analysis of the Traditional Cultural Terraced Olive … |
269 |
as a cultural landscape, advocated by local institutions, could generate useful synergies to implement efficient collective marketing policies, which are particularly demanded by olive growers.
The future possibility of ‘selling’ not only excellent olive oil, but also a whole terroir with its history, culture, traditions, and quality of life might persuade younger generations to remain in the area. It should be remembered that olive groves are considered a ‘social crop’, as olive growing is amongst the agricultural activities that create the most jobs per hectare (Colombo and Perujo-Villanueva 2017), and olive groves are recognized as a Mediterranean landscape identity (Loumou and Giourga 2003). To be included in the World Heritage List, a site should stand out for its exceptional value, be of Outstanding Universal Value, and meet some criteria, including integrity and/or authenticity of the properties, adequate protection, and management.
However, in agreement with Sklenicka et al. (2017), we would like to underline that it is essential to select protection and management methods that best correspond to both the natural conditions of the site and economic interests of farmers.
Acknowledgements The research on which this paper is based was undertaken as part of a research project titled ‘Traditional agricultural landscapes in Italy: multi-disciplinary and multi-scale assessment for the development of an integrated model for landscape planning and management’, co-financed by Programs of Relevant National Interest (PRIN) Grant number 2010LE4NBM_013, and as a part of a research project titled ‘The quality of the landscape for socio-economic development: the case study of Trevi’s historical olive groves’, co-financed by Basic Research of University of Perugia. We are particularly grateful to Carlo Sportolaro for his cooperation in construction of the GIS database and for realisation of maps, and to Alvaro Paggi and Tiziana Ravagli for their cooperation in conducting the study. We would like to thank Valeria Illuminati for editing the English language in the manuscript. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this article.
References
Agnoletti M (2012) The Italian historical rural landscape. Cultural values for the environment and rural development. Springer, Dordrecht
Agnoletti M, Conti L, Frezza L, Monti M, Santoro A (2015) Features analysis of dry stone walls of Tuscany (Italy). Sustainability 7(10):13887–13903. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013887
Arnáez J, Lana-Renault N, Lasanta T, Ruiz-Flaño P, Castroviejo J (2015) Effects of farming terraces on hydrological and geomorphological processes. A review. Catena 128:122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.01.021
Barbera G, Biasi R (2011) I paesaggi agrari tradizionali dell’albero: il significato moderno di forme d’uso del suolo del passato. Italus Hortus 18(1):23–40
Barbera G, Cullotta S, Rossi-Doria I, Rühl J, Rossi-Doria B (2010) I paesaggi a terrazze in Sicilia: metodologie per l’analisi, la tutela e la valorizzazione. ARPA Sicilia, Collana Studi e Ricerche, 7 Bender O, Boehmer HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP (2005) Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in Southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 70(1):111–125. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.008
Bevilacqua P (2012) Umbria. In: Agnoletti M (ed) Paesaggi Rurali Storici. Per un catalogo nazionale, Laterza
270 |
B. Torquati et al. |
Bonardi L, Varotto M (2016) Paesaggi terrazzati d’Italia: eredità storiche e nuove prospettive. FrancoAngeli
Colombo S, Perujo-Villanueva M (2017) Analysis of the spatial relationship between small olive farms to increase their competitiveness through cooperation. Land Use Policy 63:226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.032
Cullotta S, Barbera G (2011) Mapping traditional cultural landscapes in the Mediterranean area using a combined multidisciplinary approach: Method and application to Mount Etna (Sicily, Italy). Landsc Urban Plan 100(1):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.012
de Graaff J, Zuazo VHD, Jones N, Fleskens L (2008) Olive production systems on sloping land: prospects and scenarios. J Environ Manage 89(2):129–139
Duarte F, Jones N, Fleskens L (2008) Traditional olive orchards on sloping land: Sustainability or abandonment? J Environ Manage 89(2):86–98
Ferro-Vázquez C, Lang C, Kaal J, Stump D (2017) When is a terrace not a terrace? The importance of understanding landscape evolution in studies of terraced agriculture. J Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.036
Fukamachi K (2016) Sustainability of terraced paddy fields in traditional satoyama landscapes of Japan. J Environ Manage xxx:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.061
Kieninger PR, Penker M, Yamaji E (2013) Esthetic and spiritual values motivating collective action for the conservation of cultural landscape—a case study of rice terraces in Japan. Renew Agric Food Syst 28(4):364–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000269
Krystallis A, Ness M (2005) Consumer preferences for quality foods from a South European perspective: a conjoint analysis implementation on Greek olive oil. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 8(2):62–91
LaFevor MC (2014) Restoration of degraded agricultural terraces: rebuilding landscape structure and process. J Environ Manage 138:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.019 Loumou A, Giourga C (2003) Olive groves: “The life and identity of the Mediterranean”. Agric
Hum Values 20:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022444005336
Modica G, Vizzari M, Pollino M, Fichera CR, Zoccali P, Di Fazio S (2012) Spatial-temporal analysis of the urban–rural gradient structure: an application in a Mediterranean mountainous landscape (Serra San Bruno, Italy). Earth Syst Dyn 3(2):263–279. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd- 3-263-2012
Moser R, Raffaelli R (2012) Consumer preferences for sustainable production methods in apple purchasing behaviour: a non-hypothetical choice experiment. Int J Consum Stud 36(2):141– 148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01083.x
Palazzo AN, Aristone O (2017) Peri-urban matters. Changing Olive growing patterns in Central Italy. Sustainability 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040638
Proietti S, Sdringola P, Desideri U, Zepparelli F, Brunori A, Ilarioni L, Nasini L, Regni l, Proietti P (2014) Carbon footprint of an olive tree grove. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2014.04.019
Ridder E, Galletti CS, Fall PL, Falconer SE (2016) Economic and social activities on ancient Cypriot terraced landscapes. J Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.037 Scarpa R, Del Giudice T (2004) Market segmentation via mixed logit. Extravirgin olive oil in
urban Italy. J Agric Food Ind Organ 2:1–7
Sklenicka P, Kottová B, Šálek M (2017) Success in preserving historic rural landscapes under various policy measures: Incentives, restrictions or planning? Environ Sci Policy 75:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.010
Tait P, Saunders C, Guenther M, Rutherford P, Miller S (2016) Exploring the impacts of food label format on consumer willingness to pay for environmental sustainability: a choice experiment approach in the United Kingdom and Japan. Int Food Res J 23(4):1787–1796
Tarolli P, Preti F, Romano N (2014) Terraced landscapes: from an old best practice to a potential hazard for soil degradation due to land abandonment. Anthropocene 6:10–25. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ancene.2014.03.002
16 Economic Analysis of the Traditional Cultural Terraced Olive … |
271 |
Tempesta T, Giancristofaro RA, Corain L, Salmaso L, Tomasi D, Boatto V (2010) The importance of landscape in wine quality perception: an integrated approach using choice-based conjoint analysis and combination-based permutation tests. Food Qual Prefer 21(7):827–836
Torquati B, Vizzari M, Sportolaro C (2011) Partecipatory GIS for integrating local and expert knowledge in landscape planning. In Andreopoulos Z, Manos, Polman P, Viaggi D (eds) Agricultural and environmental informatics, governance, and management: emerging research applications, pp 378–396. Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA, USA. ISBN 978-1-60960-621-3 (hbk). ISBN 978-1-60960-622-0 (ebook)
Torquati B, Giacchè G, Venanzi S (2015) Economic analysis of the traditional cultural vineyard landscapes in Italy. J Rural Stud 39:122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.013 Vecchio R, Annunziata A (2015) Willingness-to-pay for sustainability-labelled chocolate: an
experimental auction approach. J Clean Prod 86:335–342
Vizzari M (2011) Peri-Urban transformations in agricultural landscapes of Perugia, Italy. J Geogr Inf Syst 3:145–152. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2011.32011
Zhou G, Hu W, Huang W (2016) Are consumers willing to pay more for sustainable products? A study of eco-labeled tuna steak. Sustainability 8(5):494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050494
Chapter 17
The Multidimensional Benefits
of Terraced Landscape Regeneration:
An Economic Perspective and Beyond
Luigi Fusco Girard, Antonia Gravagnuolo and Fortuna De Rosa
Abstract Terraced landscapes represent a particular type of multifunctional, his- toric–cultural agrarian landscapes, today at risk of abandonment due to socio-economic changes. These landscapes are an ancient example of a “circular” model in using resources, able to be productive in multiple dimensions, providing many ecosystem services to local communities and thus contributing to human well-being. Terraced landscapes have a complex value for society: sociocultural, environmental and economic values, which can become a driver of territorial regeneration, if a systemic economic–territorial perspective is adopted. This paper proposes the circular economy as a viable model of sustainable territorial development that can support terraced landscapes regeneration, exploiting their structural multifunctionality and thus enhancing the multidimensional territorial productivity. The ecosystem services’ assessment framework, which includes economic, spatial, quantitative and qualitative evaluation tools, can be integrated in agrienvironmental policies to make operational the “circular” paradigm of regeneration. A selection of economic tools and case studies is presented to show how circular processes can be activated in terraced landscapes, reducing costs and waste of resources, increasing multidimensional productivity, and finally attracting more investments towards a new systemic urban-rural “circular” development model.
L. Fusco Girard F. De Rosa
Interdepartmental Research Centre in Urban Planning “A. Calza Bini”, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
e-mail: girard@unina.it
F. De Rosa
e-mail: fortuna.derosa@unina.it
A. Gravagnuolo (&)
Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), National Research Council, Naples, Italy
e-mail: a.gravagnuolo@iriss.cnr.it
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 |
273 |
M. Varotto et al. (eds.), World Terraced Landscapes: History, Environment, Quality of Life, Environmental History 9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96815-5_17