- •Series Editor’s Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction
- •References
- •2.1 Methodological Introduction
- •2.2 Geographical Background
- •2.3 The Compelling History of Viticulture Terracing
- •2.4 How Water Made Wine
- •2.5 An Apparent Exception: The Wines of the Alps
- •2.6 Convergent Legacies
- •2.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •3.1 The State of the Art: A Growing Interest in the Last 20 Years
- •3.2 An Initial Survey on Extent, Distribution, and Land Use: The MAPTER Project
- •3.3.2 Quality Turn: Local, Artisanal, Different
- •3.3.4 Sociability to Tame Verticality
- •3.3.5 Landscape as a Theater: Aesthetic and Educational Values
- •References
- •4 Slovenian Terraced Landscapes
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Terraced Landscape Research in Slovenia
- •4.3 State of Terraced Landscapes in Slovenia
- •4.4 Integration of Terraced Landscapes into Spatial Planning and Cultural Heritage
- •4.5 Conclusion
- •Bibliography
- •Sources
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.3 The Model of the High Valleys of the Southern Massif Central, the Southern Alps, Castagniccia and the Pyrenees Orientals: Small Terraced Areas Associated with Immense Spaces of Extensive Agriculture
- •5.6 What is the Reality of Terraced Agriculture in France in 2017?
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Looking Back, Looking Forward
- •6.2.4 New Technologies
- •6.2.5 Policy Needs
- •6.3 Conclusions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Study Area
- •7.3 Methods
- •7.4 Characterization of the Terraces of La Gomera
- •7.4.1 Environmental Factors (Altitude, Slope, Lithology and Landforms)
- •7.4.2 Human Factors (Land Occupation and Protected Nature Areas)
- •7.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •8.1 Geographical Survey About Terraced Landscapes in Peru
- •8.2 Methodology
- •8.3 Threats to Terraced Landscapes in Peru
- •8.4 The Terrace Landscape Debate
- •8.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Australia
- •9.3 Survival Creativity and Dry Stones
- •9.4 Early 1800s Settlement
- •9.4.2 Gold Mines Walhalla West Gippsland Victoria
- •9.4.3 Goonawarra Vineyard Terraces Sunbury Victoria
- •9.6 Garden Walls Contemporary Terraces
- •9.7 Preservation and Regulations
- •9.8 Art, Craft, Survival and Creativity
- •Appendix 9.1
- •References
- •10 Agricultural Terraces in Mexico
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Traditional Agricultural Systems
- •10.3 The Agricultural Terraces
- •10.4 Terrace Distribution
- •10.4.1 Terraces in Tlaxcala
- •10.5 Terraces in the Basin of Mexico
- •10.6 Terraces in the Toluca Valley
- •10.7 Terraces in Oaxaca
- •10.8 Terraces in the Mayan Area
- •10.9 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Materials and Methods
- •11.2.1 Traditional Cartographic and Photo Analysis
- •11.2.2 Orthophoto
- •11.2.3 WMS and Geobrowser
- •11.2.4 LiDAR Survey
- •11.2.5 UAV Survey
- •11.3 Result and Discussion
- •11.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Case Study
- •12.2.1 Liguria: A Natural Laboratory for the Analysis of a Terraced Landscape
- •12.2.2 Land Abandonment and Landslides Occurrences
- •12.3 Terraced Landscape Management
- •12.3.1 Monitoring
- •12.3.2 Landscape Agronomic Approach
- •12.3.3 Maintenance
- •12.4 Final Remarks
- •References
- •13 Health, Seeds, Diversity and Terraces
- •13.1 Nutrition and Diseases
- •13.2 Climate Change and Health
- •13.3 Can We Have Both Cheap and Healthy Food?
- •13.4 Where the Seed Comes from?
- •13.5 The Case of Yemen
- •13.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Components and Features of the Satoyama and the Hani Terrace Landscape
- •14.4 Ecosystem Services of the Satoyama and the Hani Terrace Landscape
- •14.5 Challenges in the Satoyama and the Hani Terrace Landscape
- •References
- •15 Terraced Lands: From Put in Place to Put in Memory
- •15.2 Terraces, Landscapes, Societies
- •15.3 Country Planning: Lifestyles
- •15.4 What Is Important? The System
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Case Study: The Traditional Cultural Landscape of Olive Groves in Trevi (Italy)
- •16.2.1 Historical Overview of the Study Area
- •16.2.3 Structural and Technical Data of Olive Groves in the Municipality of Trevi
- •16.3 Materials and Methods
- •16.3.2 Participatory Planning Process
- •16.4 Results and Discussion
- •16.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •17.1 Towards a Circular Paradigm for the Regeneration of Terraced Landscapes
- •17.1.1 Circular Economy and Circularization of Processes
- •17.1.2 The Landscape Systemic Approach
- •17.1.3 The Complex Social Value of Cultural Terraced Landscape as Common Good
- •17.2 Evaluation Tools
- •17.2.1 Multidimensional Impacts of Land Abandonment in Terraced Landscapes
- •17.2.3 Economic Valuation Methods of ES
- •17.3 Some Economic Instruments
- •17.3.1 Applicability and Impact of Subsidy Policies in Terraced Landscapes
- •17.3.3 Payments for Ecosystem Services Promoting Sustainable Farming Practices
- •17.3.4 Pay for Action and Pay for Result Mechanisms
- •17.4 Conclusions and Discussion
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Tourism and Landscape: A Brief Theoretical Staging
- •18.3 Tourism Development in Terraced Landscapes: Attractions and Expectations
- •18.3.1 General Trends and Main Issues
- •18.3.2 The Demand Side
- •18.3.3 The Supply Side
- •18.3.4 Our Approach
- •18.4 Tourism and Local Agricultural System
- •18.6 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •19 Innovative Practices and Strategic Planning on Terraced Landscapes with a View to Building New Alpine Communities
- •19.1 Focusing on Practices
- •19.2 Terraces: A Resource for Building Community Awareness in the Alps
- •19.3 The Alto Canavese Case Study (Piedmont, Italy)
- •19.3.1 A Territory that Looks to a Future Based on Terraced Landscapes
- •19.3.2 The Community’s First Steps: The Practices that Enhance Terraces
- •19.3.3 The Role of Two Projects
- •19.3.3.1 The Strategic Plan
- •References
- •20 Planning, Policies and Governance for Terraced Landscape: A General View
- •20.1 Three Landscapes
- •20.2 Crisis and Opportunity
- •20.4 Planning, Policy and Governance Guidelines
- •Annex
- •Foreword
- •References
- •21.1 About Policies: Why Current Ones Do not Work?
- •21.2 What Landscape Observatories Are?
- •References
- •Index
172 |
J. M. Pérez Sánchez |
10.8Terraces in the Mayan Area
Studies of terraces in the Mayan area (Fig. 10.9) are important and have contributed to an understanding of how agricultural systems helped develop Mayan civilization and society in relation to the environment. There is evidence to suggest that the
Fig. 10.9 Map of the Mayan area. Source Turner II (1974)
10 Agricultural Terraces in Mexico |
173 |
Mayans developed other intensive cropping systems, and not only the slash-and-burn system, as formerly believed. Turner II (1974) and Lobato (1988) report evidence of intensive terrace systems and elevated fields in the Río Bec region, between Quintana Roo and Campeche and the Usumacinta River basin in the state of Chiapas, Mexico.
Turner II (1974) describes the Río Bec region’s terraced systems, mounds, and archeological ruins, which are located in limestone hills that range from 20 to 60 m high. These hills contain shallow, drained soils and are susceptible to erosion in the rainy season. Between Xpujil (Campeche) and Nicolás Bravo (Quintana Roo) terrace surfaces cover an area of ten square kilometers. Two types of terraces were identified there. The first consists of limestone walls, with a height of 0.80–1.40 m, filled with debris. The second type is made of smaller embankments formed by walls of unfilled limestone rocks or rows of vertically buried rocks; the walls are less than 0.40 cm high, and the width of the base fluctuates between 0.60 and 0.80 cm. Such terrace construction facilitates drainage of excess water via guide walls, infiltration outlets, and lateral inclined embankments. The small walls and the paths between the terraces allow control of water flow.
Another case in the Mayan area has been registered by Lobato (1988), in the Santo Domingo River valley, which is in the municipality of Ocosingo in Chiapas (region of the Usumacinta River). This valley has an altitude of 400 m above sea level. It has several hills between the sierras of Piedras de Bola and Güiral, and it has an average annual rainfall of 2566 mm. In this region, three terraced systems have been identified. The first consists of a set of seven bench terraces with stone walls facing east, covering an area of 930 m2. The average slope of the terraces is 39%. The terrace walls are made of sedimentary and calcareous rock, and they are generally 3.0 m high by 2.50 m wide; the soil is clay-calcareous with a depth of 25 cm.
The second system consists of terraces with walls of small calcareous rocks, different from those of the first system, which are brought from a nearby stream and are, on average, 0.60 cm high. The third system is made of four terraces covering an area of 7200 m2. The walls, which oscillate between 1.50 and 2.50 m high, are constructed with rocks of greater volume than those used in the other systems. Lobato (1988) considers that these terraced systems were carefully constructed under proper planning, and, at the time of their discovery, types one and three were in agricultural production under the slash-and-burn system where maize and beans were grown with good yields. Toward the 1980s, the farmers continued to use the terraces under the slash-and-burn system with corn and bean crops. The time, effort, and organization required to build and maintain the large-scale terraces were great, so it is inferred that the work on the terraces was intensive to produce high yields per unit area.
174 |
J. M. Pérez Sánchez |
10.9Conclusions
In Mexico, terraces are one of the traditional agricultural systems of Mesoamerican origin, and there are two predominant types—terraces with rock walls and metepantles. The terraces and metepantles are considered part of traditional agriculture and agroforestry and are associated with traditional crops, such as maize, pumpkin, green beans, and fruit trees, which provide food security for farm families. The terrace use and management continue to be carried out by peasant and indigenous families, who have accumulated a body of knowledge that allows them to develop this system and control soil, vegetation, and forms of cultivation.
Most studies of Mexican terraces have been archeological, discussing the origin and development of civilization and giving an account of the terracing system’s historical development, the growth of complex societies, techniques of building walls and water canals, the relationship between terraces and irrigation through canals and reservoirs, and the relationship between terraces and former urban centers.
In Mexico, agricultural terraces are distributed in various regions: northern, western, central, southern, and eastern. Although there are records of terraces in other regions, it is necessary to carry out more ethnographic studies that describe the current state of conservation, use and construction techniques, social organization, crops and medicinal plants, flora and associated fauna, ecological knowledge concerning terrace development, and terrace contribution to environmental conservation and its relationship with the market. Different types of terraces have been identified, and the nomenclature used to refer to them varies in different regions—for example, metepantles and milpa (cornfield) in the Central Highlands, levees in Hidalgo, lama-bordo in the Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, and terraces in Jalisco, Chiapas.
Agricultural terraces are the basis for modeling soil conservation efforts, such as those in Oaxaca under the leadership of Milpa Intercalada con Árboles Frutales (MIAF) (Cortés et al. 2012), which aimed to capture coal and boost the economy of farming families, alternating traditional crops with fruit trees, as well as increasing the amount of organic matter in the soil, controlling soil erosion, using rainwater more efficiently, and contributing to the food security of indigenous families. Another strategy that could be developed to boost agricultural terraces is agro-ecological tourism, which combines archeological sites with terraced crops.
References
Aguilar J, Illsley C, Marielle C (2003) Los sistemas agrícolas de maíz y sus procesos técnicos. In: Esteva G, Marielle C (eds) Sin maíz no hay país. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, pp 83–122
Bilbao J (1979) Sistemas y prácticas agrícolas en una comunidad de Tlaxcala. In: Ponencia, 43° Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Vancouver, Canadá
10 Agricultural Terraces in Mexico |
175 |
Cook A (1986) El control de la erosión en Tlaxcala: un problema secular. Erdkunde 40:251–261 Cortés FJ, Turrent A, Hernández E, Nicolás N, Torres J, Zambada A, Díaz P (2012) Milpa Intercalada con Árboles Frutales (MIAF). Colegio de Posgraduados, Secretaría de Agricultura,
Ganadería, Desarrollo rural, Pesca y Alimentación Diccionario del náhuatl en el español de México (2007) UNAM
Donkin RA (1979) Agricultural terracing in the aboriginal new world. The Werner-Gren for Anthropological Research, The University of Arizona
Doolittle W (2004) Canales de riego en el México prehistórico. La secuencia cultural del cambio tecnológico. Primera edición en español. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
Ennis-McMillan MC (2001) La Purificación Tepetitla. Agua potable y cambio social en el somontano. Universidad Iberoamericana, CNA-CIESAS
Frederick C, Borejsza A (2006) Reconocimiento geoarqueológico de Calixtlahuaca. In: Smith M (ed) Proyecto: Calixtlahuaca. Organización de un centro urbano posclásico. Informe Técnico parcial. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Arizona State University, pp 33–38
García Cook Á (1986) El control de la erosión en Tlaxcala: un problema secular. Erkunde 40:251–262
González JA (2016) Sistemas agrícolas en orografías complejas: las terrazas de Tlaxcala. In: Moreno AI, Casas A, Toledo V, Vallejo M (eds) Etnoagroforestería en México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, pp 109–145
Harrison PD, Turner II BL (1978) Pre-hispanic Maya agriculture. University of New Mexico Heine K (1975) Sobre la disposición y antigüedad de las terrazas de la ladera poniente del cerro
Xochitécatl, Tlaxcala, México. Comunicaciones 11
Heredia EVY, Kowalewski SA, Pérez RV (2008) Cerro Jazmín: La morfología de un centro urbano en la Mixteca Alta. In: Guadalupe Mastache A, Cobean RH, García Cook A, Hirt KG (eds) El Urbanismo en Mesoamérica. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia and Pennsylvania State University, pp 423–446
Lobato R (1988) Terrazas prehispánicas en la región del río Usumacinta y su importancia en la agricultura maya. Estud Cult Maya XVII:19–58
Martínez M, Rubio E, Palacios C (1999) Terrazas. SAGARPA, Colegio de Posgraduados Medina AI (2010) El sistema agrícola tradicional: el cultivo del maíz en Santa María Jajalpa.
Tenango del Valle Estado de México. Tesis de Maestría en Antropología Social, Facultad de Antropología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
Moctezuma S, Pérez JM, Rivera G (2015) Aportes alimenticios de los agroecosistemas tradicionales en el México rural. In: Padilla S (ed) La crisis alimentaria y la salud en México. Castellanos editores, UAEM, pp 83–100
Moreno CAI, Toledo VM, Casas A (2013) Los sistemas agroforestales tradicionales de México: Una aproximación biocultural. Bot Sci 90(4):375–398
Moreno AI, Casas A, Toledo V, Vallejo M (comp.) (2016) Etnoagroforestería en México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Mountjoy D (1985) Adaptation and change in a local agroecosystem of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Senior Thesis. University of California
Palerm A (1967) Agricultural systems and food patterns. In: Nash M (ed) Handbook of middle American Indians, anthropology social. University of Texas, pp 26–52
Palerm A (1972) Agricultura y civilización en Mesoamérica. SepSetentas
Palerm A (2008) Sistemas agrícolas en Mesoamérica contemporánea. Guía y lecturas para una primera práctica de campo, Segunda edición. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, pp 243–281
Palerm A, Wolf E (1972) Agricultura y sociedad en Mesoamérica. SepSetentas
Patrick L (1977) A cultural geography of the use of seasonally dry, sloping terrain: the “Metepantli” crop terraces of Central Mexico. PhD University of Pittsburgh
Pérez RV (2006) Sociedades complejas y paisajes agrícolas: un estudio regional de asentamientos y terrazas en la Mixteca Alta, Oaxaca, México. In: Grau Mira I (ed) La aplicación de los SIG en la arqueología del paisaje. Universidad de Alicante, España, pp 247–254
176 |
J. M. Pérez Sánchez |
Pérez SJM (2014) Agricultura de terrazas en Tlaxcala. La Caridad Cuaxonacayo. Gobierno del Estado de Tlaxcala
Pérez RV (2015) Investigaciones resientes sobre el urbanismo temprano en Cerro Jazmín, Mixteca Alta, Oaxaca. Cuadernos del Sur 21(40):62–91
Pérez RV (2016) Terrace agriculture in the Mixteca Alta Region, Oaxaca, Mexico: ethnographic and archeological insights on terrace construction and labor organization. Cult Agric Food Environ 38(1):18–27
Pérez SJM, Juan PJI (2013) Caracterización y análisis de los sistemas de terrazas agrícolas en el valle de Toluca, México. Agric Soc Desarrollo 10(4):397–418
Pérez SJM, Juan PJI (2016) Agricultura de terrazas en el cerro Tenismo, Toluca. Terra Nueva Etapa 31(51):163–184
Pérez RV et al (2017) Chronological trends in the use of valley of Oaxaca ceramics and ceramic styles at Cerro Jazmín, Mixteca Alta, Oaxaca. J Arch Sci Rep 12:580–590
Rodríguez RAR (1995) San Juan Tezontla. Lucha por el agua. Colección Tepetlaoxtoc. 6. Universidad Iberoamericana
Rojas RT (2001) La tecnología agrícola. In: Manzanilla L, López LL (eds) Historia antigua de México. Aspectos fundamentales de la tradición cultural mesoamericana, vol IV. CONACULTA, INAH, UNAM, Porrúa, pp 13–68
Sanromán, RJC (2013) “Ayuda” y “respeto” en San Pedro Chiautzingo, agencia e interdependencia en las relaciones de sus pobladores. Tesis de maestría en antropología social, Universidad Iberoamericana, México.
Smith M (2006) Proyecto: Calixtlahuaca. Organización de un centro urbano posclásico. Informe técnico parcial. Temporada 2006. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Arizona State University
Sokolosky J (1995) San Jerónimo Amanalco. Un pueblo en transición. Colección Tepetlaoxtoc. 5. Universidad Iberoamericana
Trautmann W (1981) Las transformaciones en el paisaje cultural de Tlaxcala durante la época colonial. Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH, Weisbaden
Turner BL II (1974) Prehistoric intensive agriculture in the Mayan lowlands. Examinations of relic terraces and raised fields indicates that the Río Bec Maya were sophisticated cultivators. Science 185:118–124
Part II
Towards a Multifunctional Vision of
Terraced Landscapes
Chapter 11
Mapping Agricultural Terraces
in Italy. Methodologies Applied
in the MAPTER Project
Francesco Ferrarese, Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo, Alberto Cosner, Stefano Brugnaro, Kaodi Alum, Angelica Dal Pozzo
and Massimo De Marchi
Abstract Agricultural terraced systems and their geographical distribution are not often represented in maps, even if they play an important role in hydro-geological hazard: Moreover, detailed cartography of these features could improve understanding and valuing their environmental, social, and economic complexity. The general aim of the MAPTER project is to map and quantify the extension the Italian terraced systems. To do that, it was necessary to apply different methodologies according to different data sources locally available: (i) traditional cartographic and photo analysis, (ii) orthophoto and high-resolution satellite images, (iii) DTM LiDAR analysis, (iv) Web Map Services and Geobrowser analysis, (v) participatory mapping and Voluntary Geography Activities, (vi) the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). At the time of this paper, the LiDAR DTM allows us to highly improve the traditional methodologies of cartographic and aerial photos analyses, in terms of precision, costs, and time-consuming: Many terraced systems in Italy appear to be underestimated by the previous, traditional, methodologies in comparison with the results obtained by LiDAR technology and LiDAR data elaboration. This work tested different methodologies and approaches to survey study areas in the Italian context, representing a starting point to coordinate researches among academic institutions, public administrations, voluntary geographers, and citizens science, in order to implement the geographical knowledge for terraced systems and landscapes, key heritage of Italian territories.
F. Ferrarese (&) K. Alum A. Dal Pozzo
Department of Historical, Geographic Sciences and the Ancient World, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
e-mail: francesco.ferrarese@unipd.it
S. E. Pappalardo S. Brugnaro M. De Marchi
Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering,
University of Padova, Padua, Italy
A. Cosner
Archaeologist Freelance Professional, Trento, Italy
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 |
179 |
M. Varotto et al. (eds.), World Terraced Landscapes: History, Environment, Quality of Life, Environmental History 9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96815-5_11