Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5626_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
7

Methods of Extraction

Mohan Kalaskar1, Santosh U. Yele2, Muniappan Ayyanar3, Nilambari Gurav4, Vishal Beldar5, Sanjay J. Surana
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Shirpur, India
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Poona College of Pharmacy, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Pune, India
3
Department of Botany, A. V. V. M. Sri Pushpam College (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Poondi, India
4
Department of Pharmacognosy, P.E.S’s Rajaram and Tarabai Bandekar College of Pharmacy, Ponda, India
5
Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM’s, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (NMIMS)
Deemed-to-be-University, Mumbai, India
1

7.1 Introduction

Since ancient times, various cultures worldwide have uti­lized plant materials to address ailments and maintain health. Extracting medicinal compounds from plants was one of the earliest forms of healthcare, and the practice dates back thousands of years across diverse civilizations, including those of ancient Egypt, China, India, and Greece. Historical records reveal the significance of plant extrac­tions in traditional medicine. For instance, in ancient China, herbal formulations were documented in texts like the Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing, a foundational work on medicinal plants. In India, the Ayurvedic system of medi­cine, dating back over 5000 years, extensively uses plant­based extracts for healing. Similarly, ancient Egyptian medical papyri, such as the Ebers Papyrus, contained detailed recipes using plant-based substances for treating various ailments. The plant extraction methods evolved with human knowledge and technology. Initially, crude methods like mashing, soaking, and brewing were used to extract medicinal properties.
Over time, the field of plant extraction has seen an evolu­tion from rudimentary techniques such as infusion and decoction to more sophisticated methods like maceration, percolation, and modern advancements in extraction technologies.
Moreover, the extraction process allows for the production of various forms of plant-based medicines, including tinc­tures, essential oils, extracts, and herbal supplements, catering to diverse health needs. Advances in extraction
techniques, alongside the integration of technological inno­vations and analytical tools, have facilitated the efficient extraction and purification of bioactive compounds, contrib­uting to the development of innovative plant-derived phar­maceuticals and nutraceuticals. Understanding the extraction of medicinal plants is integral to unraveling their therapeutic potential and ensuring the sustainable utilization of these natural resources. This interdisciplinary field continues to hold promise for unlocking novel therapeutic agents and expanding our knowledge of the medicinal properties pre­sent in the rich biodiversity of the plant kingdom.
Asia, the world’s largest continent and home to 60% of the global population, boasts a rich diversity of medici­nal plants. This vast continent, particularly its tropical and subtropical regions, has been a reservoir of medici­nal and aromatic plants for centuries, as evidenced by well-documented practices in traditional medicine and folklore. The utilization of these plants by the native pop­ulations presents substantial potential for both social and economic development. In the global context, Asia stands out with six mega biodiversity hotspots out of the recog­nized 18, namely the eastern Himalayas, North Borneo, Peninsular Malaysia, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, and the Western Ghats of South India. The countries in the region possess a significant botanical wealth. China, for instance, is home to 30 000 species of higher plants, while Indonesia and India host 20 000 and 17 000 species, respectively. Myanmar, Malaysia, and Thailand also con­tribute significantly, with 14 000, 12 000, and 12 000 spe­cies, respectively. Highlighting the total number of plant
122 7 Methods of Extraction
Table 7.1 Region-wise distribution of endemic species.
Sr. No Region
1 Southeast Asia 42–50 40
2 East Asia including
China
3 Indian Subcontinent 25 12
4 Southwest Asia 23 7.1
Total species (thousands)
45 18.65
Endemic species (thousands)
species and endemics in the region underscores the immense biodiversity that holds potential for various fields, including pharmaceuticals, traditional medicine, and economic development (Table 7.1).
Extraction is a separation process in which the soluble constituents are removed using solvents. The primary step involves the rupture of plant cells or the breaking of the cell wall. Following this, solvents penetrate the plant cell, solu­bilize the phytochemicals, diffuse out of the plant cell, and facilitate the extraction of phytochemicals. Various tech­niques expose plant cells to solvents, allowing for the diffu­sion or leaching out of phytochemically rich solvents. The choice of methods depends on the plant part and its tissue, encompassing maceration, infusion, decoction, percola­tion, digestion, Soxhlet extraction, superficial extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and microwave­assisted extraction (MAE), among others [1]. Furthermore, the success of extraction relies on selecting an appropriate solvent to extract the targeted phytochemical. This choice is determined by the solubility of the phytochemicals; water­soluble compounds and proteins are extracted in buffers or water, while lipophilic compounds are extracted with organic solvents. Boiling ethanol is considered a universal solvent for preliminary extraction [2].
With advancements in medical science and the under­standing of molecular biology, numerous attempts have been made to establish the efficacy of medicinal plant thera­pies globally. The identification of promising phytochemi­cals in therapeutically active plants has led to the synthesis of plant-based medicines. It is estimated that globally, the market value for all medicinal plant commodities tran­scends USD 100 billion per year. In present times, despite the phenomenal growth in the development of synthetic drugs in pharmaceutical chemistry, almost 75–80% of the global population use herbal drugs as medicines, mostly in developing countries, for primary health care because of their better tolerability with the human body and minor side effects, and also easier availability. It has been documented that those natural products are used to develop an estimated 44% of all novel drugs, primarily as lead compounds, to develop and prepare partially synthetic medicines.
Several factors, including the kind of plant material, sol­vent type, solvent pH, temperature, and solvent-to-sample ratio, must be considered when selecting an effective extraction process. The intended application of the fin­ished products is another factor [3].

7.2 Ideal Properties of Solvent

Numerous considerations are crucial in the selection of solvents for extraction processes, significantly influencing the effectiveness of extraction and the quality of the derived compounds. Essential factors for consideration encompass the following:
1. Polarity: One of the fundamental factors in solvent selec-
tion is the polarity of the compound to be extracted. It is essential that the polarity of the chosen solvent corre­sponds to that of the target compound. For example, polar compounds can be dissolved in polar solvents like water, methanol, or ethanol. On the other hand, nonpo­lar compounds can be best extracted with nonpolar sol­vents like hexane or chloroform.
2. Selectivity: Solvents should exhibit selectivity in their
capacity to extract the desired compounds effectively. Consider ethanol, which, due to its versatile nature, can extract a wide range of phytochemicals from plant materials, accommodating both polar and nonpolar compounds.
3. Safety and Toxicity: Safety considerations are para-
mount. The selected solvent should be safe for use and consumption. Ethanol, frequently employed for extrac­tions, is relatively safe, while solvents with potential toxicity concerns, such as chloroform, should be used with caution.
4. Cost and Availability: Practical factors like the cost
and availability of solvents are crucial. Common sol­vents, such as ethanol and water are economically fea­sible and readily available, whereas specialized solvents like ionic liquids might be costlier and less accessible.
5. Chemical Stability: The solvent should maintain sta-
bility without chemical reactivity with the compounds to be extracted. Water, known for its chemical stability, typically avoids reactions with most compounds.
6. Residual Impact: The potential presence of solvent
residues within the extracted material must be mini­mized to avoid health concerns. Solvents like ethanol and water pose lower residual risks compared to more volatile solvents like dichloromethane.
7. Environmental Impact: A growing concern in modern
extraction processes is the environmental impact of
7. 3 Solvents for Extraction 123
the chosen solvents. Environmentally friendly or “green” solvents, such as water and ethanol, are increasingly favored options. They offer the dual advantage of safety and reduced environmental impact when compared to more toxic solvents like chloroform or dichloromethane.

7.3 Solvents for Extraction

The selection of an appropriate solvent for the extraction of medicinal plants is a critical determinant in the extrac­tion process. Several criteria need to be considered while selecting a solvent, including the type of plant, the exact portion of the plant that needs to be extracted, and the makeup of the bioactive compounds present (as depicted in Table 7.2). The extraction of polar phytochemicals is often accomplished using polar solvents like water, metha­nol, and ethanol, whereas the extraction of non-polar sec­ondary metabolites is best attended by non-polar solvents like hexane, chloroform, and other lipophilic solvents [4]. These solvents are categorized according to their degree of polarity, with water being extremely polar and n-hexane being the least (Figure 7.1). A successive extraction pro­cess requires the use of solvents arranged in order of increasing polarity. This sequence typically starts with n-hexane, the least polar solvent, progressing toward water, which possesses the highest polarity [5]. It is com­mon practice to use a mixture of solvents to achieve thor­ough extraction of different phytochemicals. These solvents can include two low-polarity solvents (n-hexane and chloroform), two medium-polarity solvents (dichlo­romethane and n-butanol), and one high-polarity solvent (water). This stepwise selection of solvents based on their polarity is crucial during fractionation or successive
Table 7.2 Commonly used solvents for extraction of different
phytochemicals [6].
Sr. No Solvents Phytochemicals
1 Water Anthocyanins, tannins, saponins,
2 Ethanol Tannins, terpenoids, polyphenols,
3 Methanol Anthocyanins, terpenoids,
4 Chloroform Terpenoids and flavonoids
5 Dichloromethanol Terpenoids
Diethyl Ether Alkaloids and terpenoids
6
7 Acetone Flavonoids
and terpenoids
flavonols, and alkaloids
saponins, tannins, polyphenols, and flavones
POLARITY OF SOLVENTS
Highly Polar
-
Acetic Acid
-
Ethylene glycol
-
Methanol
-
Isopropanol
pyridine
-
-
Nitromethane
-
Diethylamine
-
Aniline
-
Dimethyl sulfoxide
-
Ethyl acetate
-
Dioxane
-
Dichloroethane
-
Tetrahydro furan
-
Dichloromethane
-
Chloroform
-
Diethyl ether
­Toluene
-
Carbon tetrachloride
-
Petroleum ether
-
Hexane
Highly Non-Polar
Figure 7.1 Descending polarities of different solvents used in
the extraction of plants. Source: Kalaskar MG.
extraction processes. Employing a range of solvents with varying polarities allows for a more comprehensive extrac­tion of diverse phytochemical compounds, ensuring a broader spectrum of bioactive components is captured from the plant material.
In the extraction of phytochemicals, no single solvent is universally ideal, as each solvent possesses a distinct polarity that confers specific advantages and disadvantages. The selection of solvents for extraction is based on their unique characteristics [6–8]. Several widely used solvents in this pro­cess are detailed below.
1. Water: Known for its high polarity, is a widely used sol-
vent for extracting a broad spectrum of polar com­pounds. Its low cost, non-flammable and non-poisonous nature, high polarity, and capacity to dissolve a wide range of compounds are among its advantages. However, water can cause hydrolysis and promote the growth of bacteria and mold, and it often needs a con­siderable quantum of heat to concentrate extracts.
2. Alcohol: Also polar and miscible with water, alcohol is
effective in extracting polar secondary metabolites. Its benefits include not being poisonous at low concentra­tions, self-preserving at concentrations above 20%, and requiring little heat to concentrate the extract. However, alcohol fails to dissolve fats, gums, and waxes, and poses flammability and volatility risks.
124 7 Methods of Extraction
3. Chloroform: It is a nonpolar solvent that is useful for
extracting substances, such as oils, lipids, terpenoids, and flavonoids. Its benefits include being colorless, having a sweet smell, solubility in alcohols, and effi­cient absorption and metabolism in the body. However, it presents sedative and carcinogenic properties.
4. Ether: Another nonpolar solvent, ether aids in the
extraction of compounds like alkaloids, terpenoids, coumarins, and fatty acids. It boasts advantages such as miscibility with water, a low boiling point, tasteless­ness, and stability without reactions with acids, bases, or metals. On the downside, ether is highly volatile and flammable.
5. Ionic liquid (green solvent): This unique solvent stands
out for its high polarity and extreme heat stability, even remaining in a liquid state at very high temperatures, up to 3000 °C. It showcases high miscibility with water and other solvents, ideal for extracting polar com­pounds. Its perks include excellent microwave trans­mission, making it suitable for MAE, non-flammability, and applicability for liquid-liquid extraction due to its highly polar nature.
2. Nature of solvent: Maceration is a good technique if
the extraction solvent is water; however, Soxhlet extraction and percolation are better suited for volatile solvents.
3. Cost of the drug: The cost of extracting a drug influences
the selection of extraction methods. Less expensive drugs often utilize more cost-effective extraction tech­niques like maceration, which may be less efficient. On the contrary, costly drugs require more thorough extrac­tion processes, such as soxhlation or modern methods like MAE. These advanced methods, though more expensive, are preferred for their effectiveness in extract­ing higher-value compounds, ensuring a more compre­hensive yield from the costly drug materials.
4. Nature of raw material: Depending on the type of raw
material, the extraction process selected will vary. For unorganized crude drugs like gums or mucilage, mac­eration proves to be the most suitable extraction method. In the case of organized raw materials, meth­ods such as percolation, Soxhlet extraction, or other modern techniques are considered more appropriate for efficient extraction processes.

7.4 Factor Affecting Extraction Methods

1. Nature of phytochemicals: Phytochemicals that are
heat-stable are typically extracted through methods such as Soxhlet extraction or MAE. In contrast, for thermolabile phytochemicals, extraction methods like maceration, percolation, or UAE are more suitable.
Washing out

7.5 Mechanism of Extraction

The plant material must be comminuted into fine to coarse powder based on the type of extraction process and then steeped in the extraction solvent. When the herbal material comes into contact with the plant material, the extraction process begins with penetration, followed by diffusion, and ends with diffusion (Figure 7.2) [9].
Penetration
Solubilization
Diffusion
Figure 7.2 Schematic presentation of solvent and phytochemical interactions during the extraction process. Source: Kalaskar MG.
7. 6 Methods of Extraction 125
1. Penetration: The solvent when comes in contact with
the plant material, it starts to penetrate the plant mate­rial through methods like soaking, maceration, or per­colation. This allows the solvent to penetrate the plant cell walls and reach the phytochemicals.
2. Solubilization: Once the solvent reaches the plant
cells, it interacts with the phytochemicals. The solvent dissolves the phytochemicals, creating a solution con­taining a mixture of compounds extracted from the plant material. Different compounds may require var­ying lengths of time or different solvent properties for effective solubilization.
3. Diffusion: The dissolved phytochemicals move from
regions of higher concentration (inside the plant cells) to regions of lower concentration (the sur­rounding solvent). This is driven by diffusion, aim­ing to achieve equilibrium between the concentration of compounds inside and outside the plant cells. Thus, the extraction occurs.
4. The conventional method of extraction relies on the
prominent mechanisms of penetration, solubilization, and diffusion. In contrast, the modern method of extraction operates through the mechanism of burst­ing and washing out.
Modern extraction methods utilize various energy sources, such as microwaves, ultrasound, and electric cur­rents. These methods generate vibrations or pressure on the plant cell walls, leading to the bursting of cells. Consequently, this process doesn’t rely on a concentration­dependent diffusion mechanism. Instead, it exposes all phytochemicals present within the plant cells directly to the extraction solvent. The phytochemicals are then washed out based on their solubility. This mechanism sig­nificantly enhances efficiency as it operates on solubility principles, ensuring that all phytochemicals present in the plant material are efficiently extracted, making it a more effective method compared to conventional extraction.

7.6 Methods of Extraction

Extraction is the process of separating a substance from a mixture. There are many different extraction methods, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The choice of extraction method depends on the specific sub­stances being extracted and the desired purity of the final product.
The conventional method of extraction, also known as classical extraction, refers to a set of well-established tech­niques used to isolate and concentrate desired components from a mixture. These methods typically involve using a solvent to dissolve the target compound(s) from the source material, followed by separation of the solvent and the enriched extract. These methods require more time and solvents for complete extraction. On the contrary, modern extraction methods are often more efficient and less time­consuming than traditional methods. They also tend to be more environmentally friendly, as they use less solvent and produce less waste.
The conventional extraction methods include the following:
1. Decoction
2. Maceration
3. Percolation
4. Soxhlet extraction
5. Extraction of essential oil techniques
The modern methods of extraction methods comprise of the following:
1. Phytonics
2. Pressurized liquid extraction/accelerated solvent
extraction
3. Pulse electric extraction
4. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE)
5. Microwave-assisted extraction
6. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)

7.6.1 Decoction

This process involves boiling the plant material in water for 15–60 minutes to extract substances. The solvent-to-crude drug ratio is typically 4 : 1 or 16 : 1. It is employed to extract plant material that is heat-stable and water-soluble. During decoction, plant material is boiled in water for 15–60 minutes [3]. The duration of boiling will depend on the nature of plant tissues and the phytochemicals being extracted. Ordinarily, delicate plant parts such as leaves, roots, flowers, and tender stems are boiled for 15 minutes.
For instance, phenols and flavonoids have been extracted using decoction and infusion from fruits, rhizomes, and leaves at 100 °C [10, 11]. Instead, hard plant parts such as branches and tree barks can be subjected to boiling for an hour. After boiling, the mixture is cooled and then strained, it is not the ideal method for thermolabile compounds.
Powdered crude drug +
solvent (1:6; 1:4)
Boiled with water for
15–60 min
Filtered & Conc. extract
126 7 Methods of Extraction
Powdered crude drug +
solvent (1:6; 1:10)
Kept for 7 days with
occasional shaking

7.6.2 Maceration

The general process of maceration on a small scale involves placing moderately coarse powder in a closed vessel with a selected solvent for extraction. This system is left to stand for two to seven days, occasionally shaken. The extract is then strained off, and the plant residue is pressed to recover the maximum extract, followed by filtration of the extract to remove solid impurities. Preferably, maceration is carried out in a stoppered container to minimize solvent loss through evaporation [12]. The extract is frequently concentrated using vacuum evaporation. Choosing an appropriate solvent in maceration is crucial as it deter­mines the classes of phytochemicals salvaged from the samples and can enable the extraction of thermolabile phytochemicals.
The extended extraction time is required to ensure the solvent will fully penetrate the plant cell wall and dissolve the components inside the cells, followed by diffusion across the cell membrane based on the concentration gra­dient. As the extraction process is mostly static, occa­sional shaking assists in breaking the boundary wall of the solute and aids in active diffusion, bringing a new sol­vent to the surface of the plant cell particle surface to facilitate efficient extraction.
However, this procedure has the underlying disadvan­tage of low efficiency and long duration for extraction [3]. Yet, under optimized conditions, this technique has shown significant efficiency, yielding high phenolic compounds and anthocyanins from chokeberry [13]. Comparative studies have revealed that maceration techniques generally yield less than modern extraction methods [14].
7.6.2.1 Modified Macerations
1. Kinetic Maceration: It is a dynamic extraction tech-
nique used to extract bioactive compounds from plants. This involves a controlled process where the plant mat­ter is subjected to mechanical forces, such as agitation or stirring, along with the extraction solvent. This continu­ous movement helps in enhancing the extraction process by increasing the plant surface area exposed to the sol­vent, thereby improving the extraction efficiency. In addition, it also reduces both extraction time and solvent usage while achieving higher yields.
2. Digestion Maceration: It is a method for extracting
compounds from plant material by applying gentle, controlled heat during the maceration process. This technique involves immersing the plant material in a
Filtered & Conc. extract
solvent of choice and then heating the solvent-plant mixture at a controlled temperature for a specific period of time. The application of controlled heat aids in accelerating the extraction process by increasing the solubility of compounds in the solvent. Additionally, digestion maceration can offer advantages over other methods, such as the ability to extract heat-sensitive compounds or target-specific components based on their varying heat solubilities.
A study revealed that the combination of temperature and duration of kinetic maceration-digestion yielded higher levels of both extract yield and tannin content from areca seeds, demonstrating its superiority over conven­tional maceration [15].

7.6.3 Percolation

The literal meaning of percolation is passing through. In this extraction process, the solvent is passed through the column of the drug, which is packed in a special apparatus called a percolator. The process involved critical packing of a drug in the percolator. The packing involved carefully bedding of moistened drug in the percolator over a previ­ously moistened glass wool or other suitable material, ensuring loose and uniform packing. After this step, a filter paper is placed on top of the drug bed, and washed pebble stones are then placed on the filter paper to ensure that the top layer of the drug remains undisturbed when the sol­vent is added for extraction (maceration) and controlled flow of solvent through it (Figure 7.3).
Lid
Filter paper with washed pebbles
Drug column
Percolator
Filer medium (usually glass wool)
Flow regulating valve
Figure 7.3 Packing of the drug in the typical conical
percolator. Source: Kalaskar MG.
7. 6 Methods of Extraction 127
The process of percolation can be divided into three steps
as follows:
1. Imbibition
2. Maceration
3. Percolation
7.6.3.1 Imbibition
The organized crude drug can be categorized into soft tissue and hard tissue types. Soft tissue plant material exhibits a tendency to swell upon contact with solvents. While certain materials, such as ginger, can be directly packed into the percolator in a dry state, this approach may pose challenges for other drugs. The swelling caused by soft tissue plant material can restrict or even impede solvent flow, thereby significantly hindering the extraction process. Packing dry powder can cause small particles to go down the column, settling at the bottom and significantly decreasing porosity, which could block the column completely. These fine parti­cles may even be washed out of the percolator altogether. Uneven packing further complicates the extraction process by allowing more solvent to pass through channels with lower resistance, resulting in inefficient extraction. To over­come these challenges, it is advised to uniformly wet the raw material with the solvent in a closed tank for four hours as a first step. Imbibition is the process by which the crude drug swells to its maximum extent, facilitating optimal sol­vent penetration and efficient extraction.
7.6.3.2 Maceration
After the packing of imbibed plant material, the percolator is filled with solvent, and as the solvent starts dripping through the tap, the tap is shut. A necessary amount of solvent is then added to uphold an ample layer above the drug column, and the mixture is left undisturbed for a duration of 24 hours. This process of steeping a drug with solvent is known as mac­eration. This is a crucial step in percolation extraction, as the maximum extraction occurs through the mechanisms of penetration, solubilization, and diffusion.
7.6.3.3 Percolation
After the maceration, the outlet of the percolator is opened to percolate macerated solvent at a controlled rate with continu­ous addition of fresh solvent. The quantity of percolate gath­ered varies based on the characteristics of the end product. In general, about 75% of the volume of the finished product is collected [3, 16].
There are two types of percolations used for the extrac­tion of phytochemicals from medicinal herbs. That includes cold percolation and hot percolation.
1. Cold Percolation: The cold percolation is simplest
method of percolation. The comminated plant mate­rial is packed into a percolator as described earlier. Fresh solvent is then added and allowed to macerate for a sufficient period, allowing the plant active chemi­cals to equilibrate with the solvent. Subsequently, the solvent is permitted to percolate slowly from the out­let, ensuring a controlled rate to maximize extraction efficiency. While this method is straightforward, it is not the most efficient due to the slow mass transfer rate, leading to a prolonged time required to reach equilibrium.
To address the limitations, multiple percolations can be employed. This technique involves repeated percolation of fresh solvent through the equilibrated plant material, typi­cally four to five times, until the plant material is exhausted for active phytochemicals. All percolates are then pooled and concentrated. Although this method achieves a more com­plete extraction, it requires a significantly higher solvent vol­ume compared to simple percolation.
To overcome the issue of incomplete extraction in a sin­gle percolation step, a series of connected percolators can be employed. This approach, particularly suited when mul­tiple percolations are necessary for complete extraction, utilizes four or more percolators arranged sequentially. The plant material to be extracted is evenly distributed amongst all percolators. The outflow from the first percolator serves as the inflow for the second, and so on, with the final per­colator’s outflow collected as the enriched extract. The extraction process commences with the addition of fresh solvent to the first percolator. Following an equilibration period, the solvent is transferred to the second percolator. At each stage, the solvent is allowed sufficient time to reach equilibrium with the active principles present in the plant material. In the final percolator, the solvent achieves equi­librium with the plant phytochemicals four times over. Conversely, the plant material in the first percolator remains in contact with fresh solvent for four consecutive cycles. This counter-current flow ensures exhaustive extraction. As the first percolator becomes depleted of active principles, it can be disconnected from the series and replaced with a fresh percolator containing new plant material. By implementing this rotation system, each per­colator’s solvent interacts with the solid material three times, becoming fully saturated with the target compounds. The concentrated extract subsequently undergoes solvent recovery and concentration. This method only necessitates the concentration of one enriched extract (Figure 7.4). This significantly reduces energy consumption and improves overall process efficiency, lending itself well to continuous operation [17].
128 7 Methods of Extraction
Solvent Reservoir
Figure 7.4 Schematic presentation of multiple percolation. Source: Kalaskar MG.
Percolator
1
Percolator
2
Flow of solvent
Percolator
3
Percolator
4
Extract
Receiver
2. Hot Percolation: In the extraction processes, the rela-
tionship between solvent temperature and the solubil­ity of active compounds is a critical consideration. Elevating the solvent temperature offers a significant advantage: it amplifies the solubility of the active prin­ciple. This heightened solubility creates a more pro­nounced concentration gradient, consequently bolstering the shift of the phytochemicals from the plant material into the extracting vehicle, provided the phytochemicals are thermostable. This can be accom­plished by the integration of a heat exchanger posi­tioned connecting the circulation pump and the inlet of the percolator. This configuration optimizes the pro­cess by incessantly channeling the extract through a tubular heat exchanger, a conduit warmed by the introduction of steam. This elevated temperature, meticulously regulated by a steam solenoid valve, is overseen by a temperature indicator controller, ensur­ing precise control over the percolator’s extract tem­perature. This setup can be used in either a single percolator or in a series of percolators as required.
Percolation remains a prevalent method in industrial extraction, employing tall cylindrical towers resembling percolators. However, loading the drug into these cylindri­cal percolators demands significant labor and time. To streamline this process, perforated baskets have been intro­duced. These baskets allow for the convenient loading of the material to be extracted outside the extractor. Using a chain pulley block, these loaded baskets can be inserted into the extractor, simplifying the extraction process. Post­extraction, they can be lifted out from the extractor for dis­charging the residual material. In certain extractor designs, an electrical hoist facilitates both the loading of materials and the discharge of residual matter (marc). This imple­mentation significantly reduces labor requirements while enhancing the speed and efficiency of operations [17].

7.6.4 Soxhlation (Hot Continuous Percolation)

This extraction method operates on percolation principles and is commonly known as the Soxhlet extraction method, developed by von Soxhlet in 1879. The Soxhlet extraction
system comprises an extractor, referred to as the Soxhlet apparatus, which includes a cellulose cartridge (also known as a thimble) where plant material is placed. Moreover, there is a round-bottom flask placed beneath the extractor and a reflux condenser positioned over the collection flask. The typical apparatus is depicted in the Figure 7.5.
It is based on the same principle of percolation, i.e. imbi­bition, maceration, and percolation process. The plant material is imbibed with a sufficient quantity of solvent and filled in the Soxhlet apparatus, which has a specific arrangement of perforation, one for solvent vapor open from the side bottom and open above the level of the thim­ble (drug packing), and another perforation from the bot­tom of Soxhlet, which extended as siphon from the side of Soxhlet and opens below the opening of the side arm.
Cooling water out
Cooling water in
Condenser
Side arm/vapor
path
Siphon tube
Thimble
RBF with solvent
Heat source
Flow of Solvent
Figure 7.5 Schematic diagram of soxhlation (hot continuous
percolation). Source: Kalaskar MG.
Flow of extract
7. 6 Methods of Extraction 129
After placing the sample in the extractor and adding the solvent to the collection flask, the heat is activated. As the temperature rises, the solvent evaporates and passes through the reflux condenser, returning to the extractor in liquid form. The solvent saturates the sample, facilitating the extraction of the desired compounds. Subsequently, the extract is transferred back to the collection flask through a siphon. Soxhlet extraction offers several advantages, such as simplicity, low capital cost, and efficient solvent reutili­zation for extraction purposes. However, it does come with limitations, notably the inability to agitate and its unsuita­bility for thermolabile solvents [18, 19]. To overcome these drawbacks and enhance efficiency while reducing extrac­tion time, modifications have been introduced to the con­ventional Soxhlet method. These modifications encompass operating the method under high pressure (1000–1500 psi), combining it with ultrasound and microwave techniques, and automating the extraction assembly [18].

7.6.5 Extraction of Essential Oil Techniques

Different techniques are commonly employed to extract volatile compounds, such as essential oils, which are not soluble in water, from a variety of aromatic and medicinal plants. It has wide applications for the extraction of essen­tial oils from plants [2, 19]. These methods can be catego­rized as follows:
1. Distillation–hydro distillation, steam distillation
2. Maceration–enfleurage and digestion
3. Physical method–expression and eculle
7.6.5.1 Distillation
The distillation process involves heating the material with solvent, converting into a vapor phase, followed by conden­sation in the receiver to obtain a product. In the case of essential oil extraction, the aromatic plant material is packed in a vessel with water or on a perforated plate, and live steam is passed through it, which later is connected to
the condenser and receiver. Exposing aromatic plants to hot water or steam releases the essential oil from the essen­tial oil glands of the plant tissue. The mix of water and essential oil vapor condenses through indirect cooling with water in a condenser. The distillate is sent to a separator, where the oil separates from the distilled water.
Hydrodiffusion stands as the primary mechanism gov­erning the distillation process, which entails the move­ment of essential oils and hot water through plant membranes. As such, plant cell membranes are nearly impermeable to volatile oils. In hydrodiffusion, as water boils, some volatile oils solubilize into the water within the glands. This mixture of oil and water then penetrates the swollen membranes through osmosis, ultimately reaching the outer surface. Here, the oil undergoes vaporization upon exposure to passing steam. It is noteworthy that the rate of essential oil vaporization remains unaffected by the volatility of the oil components; rather, it depends upon their solubility in water. Consequently, constituents with higher boiling points yet greater water solubility within the plant tissue distill before those with lower boiling points but lesser water solubility. Given the relatively slow rates of hydrodiffusion, the distillation process for uncomminuted material necessitates a longer duration compared to com­minated material (Figure 7.6) [20].
7.6.5.1.1 Disadvantages of Hydro Distillation
Incomplete extraction poses the primary drawback of hydro distillation. Certain compounds, like esters, undergo partial hydrolysis, and sensitive substances, such as alde­hydes, tend to polymerize during this process.
Hydro distillation necessitates a large number of distilla­tion vessels, large space, and increased fuel consumption. Its execution requires significant expertise and understanding of the technique.
The method is not economically feasible for high-boiling and water-soluble oil components since they cannot be completely evaporated and need additional steam.
I II III
f
c
d
e
Steam
generator
d
e
f
c b a’
d
e
f
c
b a
Heat Source
Figure 7.6 Distillation process I) hydrodistillation, II) hydrosteam distillation, III) steam distillation, where a: water; b:
perforated plate; c: plant material; d: condenser; e: collecting bottle; f: water circulating tube; a’: steam. Source: Kalaskar MG.
Heat Source
b
a
130 7 Methods of Extraction
7.6.5.1.2 Hydro Steam Distillation
This method resembles hydrodistillation but involves specific adjustments. It includes setting up a perforated lattice to lift the plant material above the water level. Connecting a coho­bation tube enables the recirculation of condensed water throughout the distillation process, guaranteeing a sufficient water supply in the distillation vessel. Moreover, this tech­nique aids in controlling the loss of solubilized oxygenated components in the condensed water. The reused condensed water becomes saturated with dissolved constituents, facili­tating the dissolution of more oil (Figure 7.6) [16, 17].
7.6.5.1.3 Advantages of Hydro and Steam Distillation over Hydro Distillation
1. Enhanced essential oil production.
2. Reduced likelihood of successful hydrolysis and polym-
erization processes with volatile oil components.
3. Proper management of the refluxing process mini-
mizes the loss of polar compounds.
4. Steam and water distillation result in more consistent
oil quality.
5. Steam and water distillation is a quicker and more
energy-efficient method compared to water distillation.
7.6.5.1.4 Disadvantages of Hydro and Steam Distillation over Water Distillation
Oils that have a high boiling point need more steam to turn into vapor during distillation. This means the process takes longer.
When distilling, the plant material gets wet because the steam needs to turn the water in the material into vapor before it can condense higher up in the still.
To stop the lower plant material from getting soaked, a baffle is used. It controls the boiling of water, preventing it from vigorously contacting the plant material directly.
c) The preferred method for large-scale oil produc-
tion, when compared with the other two methods.
2. Disadvantage: Significantly greater capital invest-
ment is required to initiate this operation compared to the other two processes.
7.6.5.2 Expression
Extraction of essential oil from citrus fruit is specially done by expression technique. It is ideal for aromatic plants, which contain a higher amount of essential oil cells in the epidermis of the plant. There are two methods that are sponge technique and equaling. In the sponge method, the citrus peels are either blended into the sponge or pushed against a hard object that is placed underneath a huge nat­ural sponge. Later, the oil absorbed by the sponge was sepa­rated by pressing against a hard object or some other container. The oil extracted by this method has a natural aroma than other methods [16, 17].
The second approach, called equaling, involves using a shallow bowl made of copper or brass with a hollow central tube. The equaling tool looks like a shallow funnel. The bowl contains brass points with blunt ends. The citrus fruit is rolled across these points by hand or by an automated machine with pressure until all the oil glands have burst. The oil and aqueous cell contents flow down the hollow tube into a container (Figure 7.7). The oil is extracted from the mixture using decantation and subsequently isolated from the juice.
7.6.5.3 Ecuelle
In the ecuelle process, citrus fruits are introduced from a hopper into the abrasive shell of the apparatus. A deliberate and gradual rotation of the fruits occurs against the abrasive
Fresh citrus peels
7.6.5.1.5 Direct Steam Distillation
It is the most commonly used method for producing essential oils in large quantities. It is a common practice in the flavor and fragrance supply industry. This process involves heating the plant material via steam distillation, which is produced by a satellite steam generator located outside the still, com­monly known as a boiler. Unlike water and hydro steam dis­tillation methods, steam distillation allows for precise control of the steam amount, limits the heating of plant material to 100 °C, and prevents thermal deterioration (Figure 7.6).
1. Advantages: a) Steam can be controlled as per need. b) The components of oil do not undergo heat
degradation.
Volatile oil
Figure 7.7 Expression technique of extraction of volatile
oil. Source: Kalaskar MG.