Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5198_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
61 Мб
Скачать
38 Trauma Resuscitation intheHealth Information Technology Age
325
Fig. 38.1 Advances in HIT enable the integration of time-stamped, high-resolution data from numerous sources (i.e., multidimensional data) and the ow of that data to several tiers of analysis
Rapid andComplete Documentation
Similarly, the Craig Joint Theater Hospital in Afghanistan utilized the T6 Health Systems mobile application to improve
The major trauma patient medical record often requires input from multiple specialties and care providers along a complex and prolonged clinical pathway. Historically, this has led to inaccuracies in data entry and missing or lost data, even with the use of traditional electronic medical records [6, 7]. However, advances in HIT user interface design and mobility have enabled trauma teams to document right at the point of trauma resuscitation, and to create accurate, complete, and holistic patient electronic health records (EHRs). Numerous studies have validated the effectiveness of novel digital tools in improving documentation practices.
A pilot study at the Trauma Unit at Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, demonstrated the successful implementation of an electronic trauma health record (eTHR) using mobile, iPad-based technology [8]. The transition from paper-based documentation to the eTHR resulted in higher documentation completion rates of trauma admission records, operative notes, and discharge summa-
their trauma documentation [9]. In a comparative study, the completeness and accuracy of data capture were evaluated by comparing T6 electronic records with handwritten docu­mentation from the same trauma resuscitations. The study revealed an overall 13% increase in data capture compared to the gold standard paper resuscitation records, and a high accuracy rate of 96% with the electronic application [9]. This evidence supported the hypothesis that trauma-tailored elec­tronic documentation applications, such as T6 Health Systems, can signicantly enhance the completeness and accuracy of trauma documentation.
HIT, encompassing mobile applications and electronic records, enables the development of accurate, complete, and holistic patient EHRs in trauma care. The validation of these digital tools in real-world trauma settings underscores their potential to improve usable data capture, accessibility, and interoperability, with the potential to inform improved qual­ity of patient care.
ries, along with increased provider satisfaction [8].
326
J. Kroeker et al.
Situational Awareness: Overhead Dashboards inTrauma Resuscitation
Optimal patient outcomes in trauma resuscitation rely on seamless integration of multiple healthcare specialists and disciplines, all dependent on real-time data in a fast-paced and dynamic environment. Digital transformation brings forth the capability for multidisciplinary team members to share and access multidimensional data, contribute to shared mental models, and smooth the ow of resuscitation as data ows between user interfaces, monitors, labs and diagnos­tics, and overhead dashboards.
Studies in the eld of cognitive science have revealed that the human brain possesses the highest capacity for process­ing visual information compared to other senses. In fact, it is estimated to be 10 times more efcient than touch and 100 times more efcient than hearing or smell [10]. Moreover, visual data is processed at such a remarkable speed and vol­ume that a signicant portion of this processing occurs sub­consciously. This phenomenon, known as preattentive processing, plays a crucial role in reducing cognitive load, enabling us to effortlessly comprehend complex images by subconsciously organizing their components into a cohesive system. Consequently, through collaboration with cognitive psychologists and engineers, the application of visual cogni­tion science has shown great promise in enhancing situa­tional awareness within the healthcare domain.
To illustrate the potential benets, Calder etal. conducted a study involving the implementation of an overhead visual dashboard that provided real-time updates on patient status during resuscitation simulations [11]. The participants in this study reported an increase in condence levels and a reduction in stress during simulations. Furthermore, partici­pants felt that the visual dashboard improved provider per­formance and facilitated smoother transitions in patient care. Similarly, Parush etal. (2017) showed how a visual dashboard improved teamwork (as measured by the Clinical Teamwork Scale), increased multidisciplinary discussion, and enhanced situational awareness (as measured by the Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique tool) in resuscitation simulations [12]. Both studies suggest data visualization tools have the capacity to signicantly improve team dynamics in real-life scenarios in the trauma bay.
T6 Health Systems, a mobile application specically designed for the iPad to synchronize real-time data collec­tion with trauma resuscitation workows (as depicted in Fig.38.2), offers options to display data on overhead dash­boards, enhancing information accessibility and situational awareness (Fig.38.3). This visual aid is designed to present real-time data in a way that reduces each practitioner’s cog­nitive load, thereby allowing the trauma team to work together from a shared mental model. Ultimately, this tech­nology enables a more synchronized and efcient approach to trauma resuscitation.
Fig. 38.2 Mobile, digital user interface congured to trauma workows to support near real-time collection of resuscitation data. (Source: T6 Health Systems (used with permission))
38 Trauma Resuscitation intheHealth Information Technology Age
Fig. 38.3 T6 mobile application connected to overhead dashboard to enhance team situational awareness. (Source: Apple News (https://www.apple.
com/newsroom/2021/11/ veterans- use- apple­technology- to- revolutionize­trauma- medicine/))
327

Clinical Decision Support

The digital transformation of medical records enables context- based clinical decision support (CDS). CDS, includ­ing timely alerts, relevant clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), checklists, and risk scores, are triggered by incoming clinical assessments and offer tailored responses based on data inputs.
Integration of this digital technology in the trauma bay is already underway. For instance, a pilot study evaluating a digital decision support tool, called BloodNavigator, for massive transfusion during trauma resuscitation was found to be useful based on user feedback [13]. This tool featured a color display that changed based on the administered ratio of blood products, providing immediate visual feedback on adherence to evidence-based guidelines for blood product resuscitation.
Additionally, applications such as T6 offer customizable features that enable instant linkage to local clinical practice guidelines, checklists, and relevant risk scores when specic injury mechanisms are entered. For example, if a major blunt mechanism of injury is entered, the system will generate a suspected cervical spine injury clinical pathway with appro­priate action items, such as ordering necessary imaging (Fig.38.4). Whether CPGs or checklists are consulted or not, they bring tailored, evidence-based best practices to the bedside as a reference standard for teams working in stress­ful conditions under heavy time constraints.
Articial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) have immense potential in enhancing clinical decision support in
trauma care; however, they require high-resolution, time­stamped data that may not be readily available or accessible through conventional electronic health records (EHR) or reg­istries to realize their full potential. A comprehensive review of AI/ML applications along the continuum of trauma care [14] showcased the promising capabilities of AI/ML in prog- nosticating critical care interventions and patient outcomes and informing patient trajectory. For instance, the Epic Deterioration Index (EDI), a machine learning tool, has been validated as effective in predicting mortality and unplanned ICU admission in trauma patients, achieving an impressive AUC of 0.98 [15]. Similarly, an algorithm utilizing vital signs, demographics, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) achieved an AUC of 0.99in determining the need for life-saving interven­tions upon emergency department (ED) presentation [16]. Moreover, utilization of AI/ML during the PROPPR trial, which collected rich data during the study period, revealed novel associations between hemostasis and time that were not discovered via conventional statistical analysis methods [17]. By integrating AI/ML into a comprehensive digital frame­work, as depicted in Fig.38.5, its utility is amplied through unrestricted access to high-resolution data.
This integration allows for a more comprehensive assess­ment of all available clinical clues, accounting for variations in their importance over time, and revolutionizing decision­making. HIT capable of capturing and analyzing incoming high-resolution data at the point of care may make it possible to equip trauma teams with increasingly sophisticated AI/ ML predictive analytics to support more effective clinical decision-making in rapidly evolving situations.
328
Fig. 38.4 T6 Dashboard displaying clinical practice guidelines in response to real-time data input. Here, input of a major blunt mechanism of injury triggered an institution-specic cervical spine injury pathway. (Source: T6 Health Systems (used with permission))
J. Kroeker et al.
Fig. 38.5 Schematic of dashboard view demonstrating ongoing, real-time renement of risk prediction (i.e., probability of massive transfusion) as new data accumulates over time, and data elements in the predictive AI/ML model undergo time-dependent changes in their clinical signicance. (Source: T6 Health Systems (used with permission))

Quality Improvement

Utilizing digital tools, the collection and accessibility of high-resolution digital data along the continuum of trauma care enables tracking of specic actions performed during the care process and the instantaneous creation of process maps (Fig.38.6).
Process mapping is a valuable tool in quality improve­ment efforts as it helps identify inefciencies, bottlenecks, and variations in the care process. By visualizing the care
pathway, healthcare teams can streamline workows, reduce delays, and enhance overall efciency. It also facilitates the identication of areas for standardization and the develop­ment of standardized protocols, ensuring consistent and high-quality care delivery, promoting patient safety, and reducing errors. For example, implementation of a hip frac­ture care pathway in response to patient process mapping improved patient throughput to operative intervention and complication identication [18].
38 Trauma Resuscitation intheHealth Information Technology Age
Fig. 38.6 Visualization of patient data along the space-time continuum facilitates tracking of specic actions during the care process and enables creation of process maps for quality improvement initiatives. (Source: T6 Health Systems (used with permission))
329
Moreover, process mapping serves as a foundation for value-based healthcare (VBHC) agendas. VBHC is a strate­gic healthcare delivery model that incorporates evidence­based medicine with patient-perceived value conferred by healthcare interventions [19]. Successful VBHC relies on high-resolution data for constant quality assessment, imple­mentation of targeted interventions, monitoring of changes, and outcome measurement. This iterative approach allows for ongoing evaluation and renement of care processes to continually improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. Developing HIT innovations has tapped potential in driving the adoption of VBHC initiatives in trauma centers. For example, the T6 application offers an automated framework that calculates personnel, equipment, supplies, and space costs, enabling time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). This feature can measure the economic value of value-based healthcare initiatives by providing accurate cost assessments. However, additional research is required to validate the effectiveness of these types of digital tools in delivering these benets.

Research

Digital transformation of the medical health record is revolu­tionizing trauma research by overcoming traditional barriers associated with data collection and analysis. Unlike conven­tional trauma registries built from traditional EHRs or paper charts, which lack congurability for efcient data retrieval
and require substantial time and resources for creation and maintenance, digital data capture applications and advance­ments in data storage and exchange facilitate the seamless and instant creation of comprehensive, information-rich trauma databases.
A notable example of the power of digital technology in trauma research is the successful implementation of the elec­tronic Trauma Health Record (eTHR) pilot in Groote Schuur Hospital, in Cape Town, South Africa [8]. Over the course of a year, the eTHR pilot generated an extensive dataset com­prising more than 11, 000 trauma admissions, offering researchers valuable insights and opportunities for analyzing injury patterns, identifying trends, and evaluating clinical outcomes (Fig. 38.7) [20]. For instance, researchers were able to conduct in-depth analyses of a large cohort of 800+ patients with penetrating abdominal trauma to identify indi­cators predictive of successful nonoperative management [21]. These analyses were facilitated by leveraging the digi­tal database created through the eTHR pilot project.
The success of the eTHR pilot exemplies how digital technology can overcome barriers in injury surveillance and data collection for research purposes, even in resource- constrained settings. By enhancing the speed and ease of data retrieval and analysis, the eTHR pilot contributed to evidence-based decision-making and advancing trauma care practices. The transformative potential of mobile digital technology in trauma research is evident, as it improves the efciency and effectiveness of research efforts in the eld.
330
70
Daily No. of Consults
Date
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dec 1Jan 1Feb 1 Mar 1 Apr 1May 1Jun 1Jul 1
2013
J. Kroeker et al.
Aug 1 Sep 1 Oct 1Nov 1 Dec 1
2014
Fig. 38.7 Dashboard view of daily trauma center volumes showcasing the implementation of an iPad-based electronic trauma health record (eTHR) at a bustling South African trauma center. The eTHR facilitated the population of an electronic database, enabling data visualization, real-time reporting, and research-oriented data analysis. (Source: Authors original research, also published [Zargaran E, Spence R,

Trauma Systems

The pinnacle of data ow in trauma care is achieved when data captured through digital technology informs trauma systems performance improvement, including injury preven­tion strategies, trauma education, healthcare policy, and eco­nomics. This transformative opportunity lies in harnessing the continuously owing data, leveraging analytics and data visualization strategies, and fusing creative innovations together to improve health equity.
One instance where digital technology is currently being utilized to address health equity by improving access to trauma care is through trauma education and mentoring. Using video-conferencing applications, trauma surgeons can provide remote guidance and instruction to non-surgeon physicians in performing critical procedures, such as a decompressive fasciotomy [22, 23]. Studies have demon­strated the effectiveness of telementoring in improving prac­titioner condence and trauma team dynamics, paving the way for improving trauma patient outcomes in rural and resource-limited settings [22, 23]. The fusion of augmented reality (AR) technology with telementoring further elevates the potential of remote mentoring and guidance. For exam­ple, the United States military has explored its use for dam­age control procedures in battleeld situations where immediate access to a trauma surgeon may be challenging [24]. By using AR glasses and telestrated instructions, a remote surgeon can guide a nonsurgeon through critical pro­cedures, effectively providing real-time support and guid­ance. AR telementoring allows participants to complete tasks with greater accuracy and fewer distractions, presenting
Adolph L, Nicol A, Schuurman N, Navsaria P, Ramsey D, Hameed SM. Association Between Real-time Electronic Injury Surveillance Applications and Clinical Documentation and Data Acquisition in a South African Trauma Center. JAMA Surg. 2018 May 16;153 (5):e180087. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0087. Epub 2018 May 16. PMID: 29541765; PMCID: PMC5875377.)
exciting possibilities for future telementoring in real-life trauma scenarios [25]. Remote telementoring is discussed further in Chaps. 39 and 40.
While the above digital innovations have demonstrated positive impacts on a smaller scale, it is crucial to address the larger problem of the global burden of injury, which has gained international attention as a signicant public health issue. Consensus among experts emphasizes two key factors for successful implementation of a global injury-prevention initiative using digital technology: (1) establishing seamless pathways for data linkage and analysis to enable real-time data ow to guide action in injury prevention and trauma care improvement/education, and (2) fostering strong part­nerships among data scientists, health economists, data engi­neers, injury prevention workers, trauma clinicians, and policymakers to ensure analytical capacity keeps pace with the growing inux of data, leading to meaningful improve­ments in society’s safety [26]. Currently, this goal of leverag­ing digital technology to address the global burden of injury has not been fully realized.
In an increasingly globalized world, the use of digital technology has the potential to shrink distances and open doors to new opportunities, addressing trauma system inequalities and inefciencies.

Conclusion

We stand on the threshold of unprecedented transformations in healthcare propelled by digital technology. Looking ahead, we anticipate remarkable transformations in trauma
38 Trauma Resuscitation intheHealth Information Technology Age
331
care as advances in HIT drive innovations such as augmented reality (AR) with telementoring and the integration of AI/ ML into clinical practice.
Advancements in data integration, mobile digital technol­ogy, and achieving both intraoperability (i.e., complete inte­gration with existing electronic platforms within a hospital or healthcare setting) and interoperability (i.e., sharing a transfer of anonymized data sets between healthcare sys­tems) will revolutionize trauma care and enable a collective global effort to reduce the burden of injury and improve trauma outcomes [26]. However, challenges such as generat­ing incompatible data sets, ensuring privacy and data secu­rity, and carefully considering the potential harms and benets of technology must be addressed to facilitate wide­spread adoption [26].
As we navigate this exciting journey, it is crucial to remember that technology is a tool, not a panacea, and that a deep understanding of the challenges in trauma care should guide our pursuit of innovative solutions. The integration of technology into clinical practice should be done thoughtfully so as to ensure solutions address the unique needs of patients, clinicians, and systems. By leveraging design thinking—an iterative process involving dening problems, ideating solu­tions, and continuous analysis to gain actionable insights— we can foster meaningful, transformative progress in the eld of trauma. The future of trauma care is ours to shape with thoughtful and purposeful application of technology.
Key Points
• Advances in computing power, data storage, data analysis, and clinical informatics have created new opportunities for the evolution of trauma systems.
• Clinical data captured in near real time can be applied to clinical decision support and to enhance trauma team dynamics.
• Unprecedented access to high-resolution data can inform design thinking approaches to trauma sys­tems quality improvement.
• High-quality data collected at the point of care holds the promise of driving more sophisticated analytic and risk prediction strategies for trauma care.
• Technological advances in telehealth can increase the reach and impact of trauma systems to rural and remote communities and vulnerable populations.

References

1. Ofce for Civil Rights (OCR). Health information technology.
HHS.gov. Published May 7, 2008. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for- professionals/special- topics/health- information- technology/index. html. Accessed 20 May 2023.
2. Kannan V, Fish JS, Mutz JM, Carrington AR, Lai K, Davis LS, etal. Rapid development of specialty population registries and quality measures from electronic health record data. An Agile Framework. Methods Inf Med. 2017;56(99):e74–83. https://doi.org/10.3414/
ME16- 02- 0031.
3. Razzouk R, Shute V. What is design thinking and why is it important? Rev Educ Res. 2012;82(3):330–48. https://doi.
org/10.3102/0034654312457429.
4. Roberts JP, Fisher TR, Trowbridge MJ, Bent C.A design think­ing framework for healthcare management and innovation. Healthc (Amst). 2016;4(1):11–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
hjdsi.2015.12.002.
5. Lorusso L, Lee JH, Worden EA. Design thinking for health­care: transliterating the creative problem-solving method into architectural practice. HERD. 2021;14(2):16–29. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1937586721994228.
6. Kieffer JC, Thompson A, Elwell S, DePiero A.Comparison of paper and electronic documentation for trauma activations in a pediatric trauma center. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;50:719–23. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.049.
7. Bilyeu P, Eastes L.Use of the electronic medical record for trauma resuscitations: how does this impact documentation complete­ness? J Trauma Nurs. 2013;20(3):166–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/
JTN.0b013e3182a17195.
8. Zargaran E, Spence R, Adolph L, Nicol A, Schuurman N, Navsaria P, etal. Association between real-time electronic injury surveillance applications and clinical documentation and data acquisition in a South African Trauma Center. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(5):e180087.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0087.
9. Angotti LM, How RA, Barnack KR, Aden JK, Vitale DA, Folwell JS, et al. Electronic trauma resuscitation documenta­tion and decision support using T6 Health Systems Mobile Application: a combat trauma center pilot program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(6):1172–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/
TA.0000000000002909.
10. Nørretranders T.The user illusion: Cutting consciousness down to size. 1991;467. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1998- 07235- 000.
pdf
11. Calder LA, Bhandari A, Mastoras G, Day K, Momtahan K, Falconer M, etal. Healthcare providers’ perceptions of a situational aware­ness display for emergency department resuscitation: a simulation qualitative study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;30(1):16–22. https://
doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx159.
12. Parush A, Mastoras G, Bhandari A, Momtahan K, Day K, Weitzman B, etal. Can teamwork and situational awareness (SA) in ED resus­citations be improved with a technological cognitive aid? Design and a pilot study of a team situation display. J Biomed Inform. 2017;76:154–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.009.
13. Schmulevich D, Cacchione PZ, Holland S, Quinlan K, Hinkle A, Meador C, etal. Optimizing a decision support system for damage­control resuscitation using mixed methods human factors analysis.
332
J. Kroeker et al.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(2S Suppl 2):S154–61. https://
doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003224.
14. Hunter OF, Perry F, Salehi M, Bandurski H, Hubbard A, Ball CG, et al. Science ction or clinical reality: a review of the applica­tions of articial intelligence along the continuum of trauma care. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s13017- 022- 00469- 1.
15. Mou Z, Godat LN, El-Kareh R, Berndtson AE, Doucet JJ, Costantini TW. Electronic health record machine learning model predicts trauma inpatient mortality in real time: a validation study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(1):74–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/
TA.0000000000003431.
16. Liu NT, Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Darrah MI, Salinas J.Utility of vital signs, heart rate variability and complexity, and machine learn­ing for identifying the need for lifesaving interventions in trauma patients. Shock. 2014;42(2):108–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/
SHK.0000000000000186.
17. Nguyen M, Pirracchio R, Kornblith LZ, Callcut R, Fox EE, Wade CE, et al. Dynamic impact of transfusion ratios on outcomes in severely injured patients: targeted machine learning analysis of the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios random­ized clinical trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(3):505–13.
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002819.
18. Sayeed Z, Anoushiravani A, El-Othmani M, Barinaga G, Sayeed Y, Cagle P Jr, etal. Implementation of a hip fracture care pathway using lean six sigma methodology in a level I trauma Center. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(24):881–93. https://doi.org/10.5435/
JAAOS- D- 16- 00947.
19. Bae JM. Value-based medicine: concepts and application. Epidemiol Health. 2015;37:e2015014. https://doi.org/10.4178/
epih/e2015014.
20. Spence RT, Zargaran E, Hameed SM, Navsaria P, Nicol A.Mobile health technology transforms injury severity scoring in South Africa. J Surg Res. 2016;204(2):384–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jss.2016.05.021.
21. Sander A, Spence R, Ellsmere J, Hoogerboord M, Edu S, Nicol A, etal. Penetrating abdominal trauma in the era of selective conser­vatism: a prospective cohort study in a level 1 trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(2):881–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00068- 020- 01478- y.
22. Dawe P, Kirkpatrick A, Talbot M, Beckett A, Garraway N, Wong H, et al. Tele-mentored damage-control and emergency trauma surgery: a feasibility study using live-tissue mod­els. Am J Surg. 2018;215(5):927–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
amjsurg.2018.01.016.
23. Hintz G, Haines V, Dawe P.Rural trauma telementoring: a pilot project. Can J Surg. 2022;65(5):E567–72. https://doi.org/10.1503/
cjs.015020.
24. Harris TE, DeLellis SF, Heneghan JS, Buckman RF, Miller GT, Magee JH, etal. Augmented reality forward damage control pro­cedures for nonsurgeons: a feasibility demonstration. Mil Med. 2020;185(Suppl 1):521–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz298.
25. Andersen D, Popescu V, Cabrera ME, Shanghavi A, Mullis B, Marley S, etal. An augmented reality-based approach for surgical telemen­toring in austere environments. Mil Med. 2017;182(S1):310–5.
https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED- D- 16- 00051.
26. Zargaran E, Adolph L, Schuurman N, Roux L, Ramsey D, Simons R, et al. A global agenda for electronic injury surveillance: Consensus statement from the Trauma Association of Canada, the Trauma Society of South Africa, and the Panamerican Trauma Society. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(1):168–70. https://doi.
org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000880.
Telemedicine andFuture Innovation
CorryJ.Kucik, J.JonasCarmichael, andWilliamP.Mulvoy III
39
… and yet a true creator is necessity, which is the mother of our invention. (Plato, The Republic, Book II, 369c)
Introduction: TheNeed
Trauma remains a leading cause of death and disability throughout the world, including developed nations. Despite the rigorous construction of advanced trauma systems through­out the United States, regional differences persist and can be exacerbated by supply and geography constraints. Mismatches exist between the incidence of trauma throughout the United States and the number of traumatologists, Level 1 trauma cen­ters, or even adequate community hospitals existing to service this need (Fig.39.1). Due to multiple reasons (costs, inability to recruit and retain clinicians, rarity of certain types of trauma), there may never be a day that enough fully staffed and qualied centers will exist to enhance care in austere loca­tions. Further, the “tyranny of distance” imposed not only on rural locations but also on special populations (e.g., correc­tional facilities, home health care settings, nursing homes, military populations overseas or at sea, cruise ship passengers) can never be fully alleviated by the construction of US trauma centers, exacerbating the shortfall all the more.
The Promise ofInnovation andTelemedicine
Bridges to the future are needed not only to service this great need of trauma care, but perhaps, in time and with game-
C. J. Kucik (*) Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
J. J. Carmichael · W. P. Mulvoy III Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA e-mail: wmulvoy@anest.u.edu
changing technologies, to prevent and obviate it. The use of the word “innovation” is common in medicine today, where everyone from startup companies to the boards of established companies ceaselessly searches to prot from the next “big thing” in medicine. Telemedicine, the delivery of health care and the exchange of health-care information across dis­tances, holds particular promise in trauma care, particularly when existing limitations (supply, distance, etc.) render it either more acceptable than existing conventional services or indeed the only option available.
Telemedicine is dened by the Telemedicine Information
Exchange (1997) as the “use of electronic signals to transfer
medical data (photographs, x-ray images, audio, patient records, videoconferences, etc.) from one site to another via the Internet, Intranets, PCs, satellites, or videoconferencing telephone equipment in order to improve access to health care.” According to the Telemedicine Report to Congress (1997), “telemedicine can mean access to health care where little had been available before. In emergency cases, this access can mean the difference between life and death. In par­ticular, in those cases where fast medical response time and specialty care are needed, telemedicine availability can be critical. For example, a specialist at a North Carolina University Hospital was able to diagnose a rural patient’s hairline spinal fracture at a distance, using telemedicine video imaging. The patient’s life was saved because treatment was done on-site without physically transporting the patient to the specialist who was located a great distance away.”
Telemedicine interactions are generally classied as either prerecorded (also called “store-and-forward”) or real time (also called “synchronous”). In the former, information is acquired and stored before being sent to an expert for interpretation at some later time. E-mail is a common method of store-and-forward interaction today. In contrast, in real­time interactions, there is minimal appreciable delay between the information’s collection, transmission, and display. Interactive communication between individuals at the sites is therefore possible. Videoconferencing is a common method of real-time interaction.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 L. Marshall Gillman, S. Widder (eds.), Trauma Team Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86312-7_39
333
334
C. J. Kucik et al.
Fig. 39.1 Map of CONUS with relative population sizes and proximi­ties to a civilian level 1 or level 2 trauma center. Every dot represents a single ZCTA. Smaller dots represent sparsely populated ZCTAs, whereas larger dots represent densely populated ZCTAs. Blue dots are relatively close to a civilian trauma center, whereas yellow dots are rela­tively distant. CONUS, continental USA; ZCTA, Zip Code Tabulation
The common thread for all telemedicine applications is that a client (e.g., patient or health-care worker) obtains advice or—as we will likely see in the future with haptics (tactile feedback technologies that recreate the sense of touch) and robotics—direct intervention from someone with more expertise, even when the parties are separated by space, time, or both.
History andDevelopment
As human beings spread throughout every environment on the globe and even into space, the need for technology to push health care to the patient has followed. Telemedicine has thus developed into many different entities that at their core deliver information over great distances thus improving access to medical care. Describing its broad scope, Reid denes telemedicine as “the use of advanced telecommuni­cations technologies to exchange health information and pro­vide health care services across geographic, time, social, and cultural barriers” [1]. The need to overcome these varied bar­riers has driven the growth of telemedicine into multiple out­lets and practices.
Telemedicine can be classied by the type of interaction between the client and health care expert in contrast with the
Area. Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development—Scientic Figure on ResearchGate. (Available from: https://www.researchgate.
net/figure/Map- of- CONUS- with- relative- population- sizes- and­proximities- to- a- civilian- level- 1- or_g 1_360816379 [accessed 26 Oct
2024])
content of the information being transmitted [2]. In “store and forward” telemedicine, the necessary information is compiled and then sent to an expert for evaluation later. There is an inherent delay in the interpretation of the data but access to advanced technologies aids the denitive care of the patient. Cardiology event monitors, diagnostic images, or expert e-mail consultation are examples of “store-and­forward” technologies. Real-time interactions allow an immediate assessment of the patient, data, and situation to expedite appropriate care with the remote assistance of a subject matter expert. One such example is simple audio feeds broadcast over various networks that provide rst responders the ability to interact with Emergency Medicine physicians and appropriately triage patients to specialty cen­ters. Tertiary care hospitals use networked programs to link with rural or suburban areas over high-speed lines or private point-to-point connections for telecommunication among providers. The information transmitted can range from text and audio to more sophisticated interactions such as images, video, or robotic interfaces that may allow a combination of several interfaces.
The term “telepresence” describes the ability of health care providers to interact in real time with telecommunica­tion equipment, allowing for immediate feedback and assis­tance. Adapted for trauma, telepresence allows experienced