Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5198_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface: Trauma as a Team Sport
- •Contents
- •History
- •Documented Outcomes
- •Future Direction
- •References
- •Humble Beginnings
- •A New Paradigm Is Born
- •References
- •3: Evidence Supporting Crisis Resource Management Training
- •Introduction
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Trauma Team
- •Trauma Team Leadership
- •Crisis Resource Management
- •Observe, Orient, Decide, Act OODA Loop
- •Observe
- •Orient
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction: Why Does Teamwork Matter?
- •Introduction
- •Team Culture: Not Just Leaders; Followers Too
- •Crisis Communication 101
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Background
- •Leadership Styles
- •Self-Awareness
- •Self-Management
- •Social Awareness
- •Relationship Management
- •Validation
- •Putting It All Together
- •References
- •7: Followership
- •Intro
- •What Is Followership
- •Why Is Followership Important?
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Situational Awareness
- •Situational Awareness: Level One
- •Situational Awareness: Level Two
- •Situational Awareness: Level Three
- •Attention
- •Stress
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Handover Foundations
- •Handover Challenges
- •Handover Structure
- •Written Handover
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •10: Engaging Team Members
- •Respect
- •Resources
- •Engaging Virtual Teams
- •Virtual Water Cooler
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Implicit Coordination
- •The Zero-Point Survey
- •Adaptive Coordination
- •Making It Happen
- •References
- •Acute Versus Chronic Stress
- •Recognizing Chronic Versus Acute Stress
- •Education Helps
- •Hyper-realistic Simulation Training
- •Resilience Is Individualized
- •Training Is Key
- •References
- •13: Stress Exposure Training
- •Introduction
- •Stress Training
- •Information Provision
- •Cognitive Control
- •Physiological Control
- •Overlearning
- •Mental Practice
- •Decision-Making
- •Team/Communication Skills
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Conclusions, Implications, Next Steps
- •References
- •15: Trauma Video Review
- •Introduction/What Is Trauma Video Review?
- •Team Simulation/Education
- •Performance Improvement
- •Research
- •Potential Barriers
- •Consent Processes
- •Other Considerations
- •Future Directions
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Pre-arrival
- •Patient Arrival
- •Resuscitation
- •Pre-departure
- •Communication Skills
- •Structured Handovers
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Origination
- •United States Prehospital System Legal Structure
- •Science Behind Prehospital Injury Patterns
- •Team Synergy vs Rock Star Player
- •Medical Errors
- •Controversy What Should Our System Implement
- •Training Quality
- •Active Killer
- •Realistic Training
- •Lessons Learned
- •Response
- •Nonmedical Personnel
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Future Direction
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •19: Prehospital Trauma
- •Introduction
- •Safety
- •Scene Assessment
- •Trauma Dynamics
- •Prehospital Ultrasound
- •Trauma Management: Tranexamic Acid (TXA) Administration
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •20: Transport Medicine
- •Introduction
- •The Trauma Clinical Network (TCN)
- •Direct Transport
- •Inter-hospital Transport
- •Emergency or Non-emergency Transportation
- •Monitoring During Transport
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Trauma Team Leader (TTL)
- •Airway
- •Respiratory Therapy
- •Emergency Medicine Physician
- •General Surgery
- •Orthopedic Surgery
- •Neurosurgery
- •Recording Nurse
- •Trauma Team Activation
- •The Trauma Bay
- •Trauma Team Function
- •Summary
- •References
- •22: Interprofessional Team Roles
- •References
- •23: The Trauma Bay Environment
- •Introduction
- •Surge Capacity
- •Decontamination
- •Communication
- •Control Center
- •Security Considerations
- •The Trauma Bay
- •Trauma Observation Unit Setup
- •Special Situations
- •Hybrid Operating Rooms
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Design
- •Formalizing Clinician-Designer-Builder Partnerships
- •A Human-Centered Approach
- •The Missing Link
- •Evidence-Based Design
- •Build
- •Train
- •Excel
- •Putting It Together
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Human Factor Analysis
- •Hybrid Operating Environment Lexicon
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Project Implementation
- •Results
- •Conclusion
- •Appendix A: Dam Tools Usability Testing Questionaire
- •References
- •Introduction
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Team-Based Principles
- •Continuous Improvement Processes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •29: Trauma Resuscitation
- •Mechanisms
- •Neurologic Injury
- •Musculoskeletal Trauma Including Spine
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •30: Damage Control Resuscitation
- •Introduction
- •Massive Transfusion
- •Permissive Hypotension
- •Vascular Damage Control Techniques
- •Non-vascular Damage Control Techniques
- •Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
- •Open Abdominal Management
- •Damage Control Environments
- •References
- •Damage Control Part 1: Operative Intervention
- •Damage Control Part 2: Resuscitation
- •Damage Control Strategy Under Special Circumstances
- •Blast Injuries
- •Burns
- •Head Injury
- •Crush Injury
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •32: Trauma Team Decision-Making
- •Predictive Scores
- •Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs)
- •Trauma Team Leadership: Translating Decisions into Action
- •Future Directions: Toward High Reliability Organizing
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •33: Emergency Critical Care Procedures
- •Introduction
- •Airway Management
- •Tube Thoracostomy
- •Controversies
- •Antibiotics
- •Tube Selection
- •Occult Pneumothorax
- •Vascular Access
- •Peripheral Intravenous Access
- •Central Intravenous Access
- •Intraosseous Access
- •Ultrasound
- •Resuscitative Thoracotomy
- •Outcomes
- •Contraindications
- •Volume Expansion
- •Management
- •Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •REBOA Programs
- •Partial REBOA
- •Intermittent REBOA
- •Vena Cava Occlusion
- •Tourniquets
- •Junctional Tourniquets
- •Abdominal Aortic Compression.
- •Hemostatic Agents
- •Topical Hemostatic Agents
- •Chemical Hemostatics
- •Physiologic Hemostatics
- •Hemostatic Dressings
- •Intra-abdominal Foam
- •Summary
- •References
- •What Is Interventional Radiology
- •Diagnostic Imaging Workup
- •Embolic Therapies
- •Gelfoam
- •Mural Repair
- •References
- •Non-verbal
- •Verbal
- •Wider Structural Perspective
- •Transferrable Solutions
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pharmacotherapy
- •Paravertebral Block
- •Serratus Plane Block
- •References
- •Clinical Decision Support
- •Quality Improvement
- •Research
- •Trauma Systems
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Outcomes
- •The Future
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Challenges
- •Provider Stress
- •Non-verbal Communication
- •Standardized Communication
- •Strategy 1: Scripted Procedures
- •Strategy 2: Structure Triage Tool
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Fetal Monitoring
- •Radiology
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Elderly Population
- •Psychiatric Comorbidities
- •Anticoagulated Patients
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)—The Basics
- •Advanced TBI Guideline-Based Care
- •Noninvasive ICP/CPP Determination Methods
- •Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring (PbtO2)
- •Extracellular Brain Chemistry—Cerebral Microdialysis
- •Transcranial Doppler
- •Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
- •Continuous Electroencephalography (cEEG)
- •Cerebrovascular Reactivity Monitoring
- •Cerebral Compensatory Reserve
- •Individualized ICP Thresholds (iICP)
- •Integrating “Omics” into Acute Phase TBI Care—The Future
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •44: Basic Trauma Ultrasound
- •Introduction
- •The FAST Examination
- •Technique
- •Uses
- •Blunt Abdominal Trauma
- •Penetrating Trauma
- •Limitations
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Trauma Ultrasound Development
- •Pneumothorax
- •Musculoskeletal Ultrasound
- •Head Trauma
- •Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Imaging Modalities
- •Plain X-ray
- •Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
- •Other Modalities
- •Critical Thinking
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Initial Trauma CT Protocol
- •Iodinated Contrast Administration
- •Emergency Trauma MRI
- •References
- •48: Disaster Medicine
- •Natural or Man-made Disaster
- •The Disaster’s Cycle
- •Incident Command System
- •Triage
- •“Second Hit” Phenomenon
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •49: The Multi-casualty Trauma
- •Introduction
- •Historical Perspective
- •Prehospital Management
- •Triage
- •Pediatric Considerations
- •Intrahospital Management
- •Transfer Corridors
- •Blood Bank
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Crew Resource Management (CRM)
- •Resources
- •Review Process Including Logistics
- •Transactive Memory
- •Team Building (Before)
- •Team Performance (During)
- •Team Debrief (After)
- •Health
- •Fitness
- •Interagency Collaboration
- •Bystanders
- •Emergency Medical Services/Tactical EMS
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Improvised Explosive Device
- •Anti-police Violence
- •Improved Community Preparedness
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Procedures
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The MARCHE Algorithm Approach
- •Massive Hemorrhage Management (“M”)
- •Tourniquets
- •Wound Packing
- •Hemostatic Dressings
- •Junctional Tourniquets
- •Airway Management (“A”)
- •Respiration (“R”)
- •Circulation (“C”)
- •Vascular Access
- •Crystalloid
- •Hemostatic Resuscitation
- •Tourniquet Re-assessment
- •Hypothermia Prevention/Head Injury (“H”)
- •Hypothermia Management
- •Traumatic Brain Injury
- •Eye Injuries
- •Analgesia
- •Secondary Survey
- •Antibiotic Administration
- •Prolonged Field Care
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Hypothermia
- •Etiology
- •Pathophysiology
- •Lethal Triad (Diamond) Component
- •Treatment
- •Afterdrop
- •Resuscitation Progression
- •Prognosis
- •Team Dynamics
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •55: Burns
- •Incidence
- •Etiology
- •Prognosis
- •Initial Management: “ABCDE” Approach
- •Admission
- •Dressings
- •Nutrition
- •Multidisciplinary Recovery
- •Summary
- •References
- •War Zones
- •Casualty Care Team Preparation
- •Biological Weapons
- •Biological Warfare Historical Considerations
- •Personal Protective Equipment
- •Anthrax
- •Botulism Toxin
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •57: Nuclear Injuries
- •Introduction
- •Historical Background
- •Transportation
- •Hospital Care
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Further Reading
- •Introduction
- •Historical Perspective
- •Parabolic Testing
- •Surgical Field Testing
- •Diagnostics
- •Immediate Damage Control Procedures
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pandemic Impact
- •Financial Support
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Staff
- •Retraining/Reassignment
- •Consultants
- •Space/Structure
- •Trauma Bay
- •Operating Room
- •ICU or Floor
- •Clinic
- •Systems
- •Country Level
- •Regional Level
- •Hospital Level
- •Division or Trauma Team Level
- •Conclusion
- •References

130
R. Shelton and M. Brock
patient outcome. You must utilize the Hartford recommendations when you train your crews. As Fire/EMS, we will need
to operate in the yellow zones which are secure areas from
within the building. By secure, I mean vantage points Law
Enforcement has given us for the protection of corridors or
hallways and/or we have cover if secure ground cannot
remain constant. Law Enforcement will have contact teams
ahead of us to attain threat contact and then engagement for
threat suppression. Other Law Enforcement will be in the
function of primary search inadvertently while clearing the
building and are mandated to provide hemorrhage control to
those in need as they nd them. Fire/EMS’s job is to go in for
known patients at known locations that are relayed to us from
Law Enforcement during their clearing and search ndings.
The concept of MARCH was developed by the Special
Operations Forces in 1996 and has remained unchanged in
Tactical Combat Casualty Care and Advanced Trauma Life
Support, which outlines the preventable causes of death as
follows:
M: Massive hemorrhage
A: Airway
R: Respirations
C: Circulation
H: Head injury and hypothermia
This remains the systemized approach that prioritizes
life-threatening interventions.
Nonmedical Personnel
We will explore the role of non-medical personnel within the
trauma team, and the roles and responsibilities of the medical personnel within the trauma team that exist in the prehospital environment.
Bleeding control skills are taught in many rst aid classes.
Non-medical rst responders such as police ofcers, reghters, schoolteachers, and motorists can all benet from
hemorrhage control training. Members of the trauma team
can teach members of the community effective hemorrhage
control. According to the CDC unintentional injuries are the
leading cause of death for ages 1–44. This information can
help the trauma team target training courses to individuals
who are within this age group or spend a signicant amount
of time with individuals in this age group. In some US states,
both public and private schools are required by law to train
their faculty and staff in hemorrhage control and are required
to have bleeding control kits with specic contents outlined
within the law. Homeland Security’s national awareness
campaign, “Stop the Bleed” curriculum, improved the laypersons’ self-efcacy and reported willingness to use a tourniquet in an emergency [15]. After a traumatic event, it is
likely the rst person on scene is not a medical professional.
The potential impact of bystander intervention is signicant
for trauma patients, given the majority of deaths occur before
patients reach the hospital.
Conclusion
This is a critical time where effective trauma team dynamics
can make a signicant impact on the receipt of appropriate,
timely care of the traumatized patient. The trauma team
dynamics extend beyond individual teams working on a
patient to the macro environment of the entire trauma system. Each link in the patient’s chain of survival, from point
of injury to hospital discharge, should be represented in an
evidence-based discussion regarding the expectations of
each link within the chain. You must capture preplanning and
training on a continual basis as our effectiveness at executing
protocols and ability to remain competent as low-frequency,
high-risk skills have perishability. This discussion should
assess the ability of the providers, equipment, stafng, capabilities of the receiving hospitals and dene standards of care
that continue to evolve.
Key Terms
• Trauma team dynamics—a multidisciplinary
trauma team focused on crisis management strategies to improve teamwork and communication.
• High-performance team—a group of people who
work together to achieve exceptional results and
outperform other teams. For effective teams, they
must have trust, clear goals, well-dened roles, collaboration, and phycological safety and are rooted
in a learning culture.
• Waivered medication/procedure—beyond the acts
allowed and scope of practice for the provider,
which has a state waiver approved to allow acting
above their initial training curriculum.
• Medical error—an adverse effect of care that could
have been prevented.
• Immersive training—a learning method designed to
mimic, as closely as possible, the environment the
skills and team is expected to perform in with the
intent to reduce human error, eliminate critical
errors, improve trigger times, and build high performance teams in stressful environments.
• Rescue task force—a small team with a team leader,
law enforcement for a protective element and EMS
as the rescue element composing a 4-person team.
• Tactical unit contact team—eliminate threats in the
hot zone.

17 Out-of-Hospital Care fromParamedical toNon-medical Personnel
131
• Active shooter hot zone—direct threat of the shooter
and only tactical units are deployed in this area.
• Active shooter yellow zone—indirect threat where
risk is mitigated by tactics of a rescue task force for
protection or secured ground and corridors establishing tactical advantage to facilitate the treatment
and extraction of victims.
• Active shooter green zone—no threat and no need
for tactical deployments and will be the location of
unied command.
Key Points
• One team concept for trauma care: For the best
patient outcomes, trauma surgeons must have ongoing education and training touch points with rst
responders to deliver best practices and set expectations for regional trauma care.
• Acts allowed by certication/licensure: With each
level of certication or licensure, the scope varies
widely for procedures and medication administration. It is paramount to ensure protocols align with
the providers skill level of competency and the
resources available prehospital.
• Critical Care Paramedics: Focus on critical and
intensive care that would otherwise be administered
by a physician or nurse.
• Primary Causes of Death Prehospital: Hemorrhage,
followed by chest and head injuries.
• Progression of Training Concepts: Drills and functions achieved, scenario training and functions
achieved, and immersive training with functions
achieved and mastery. This progression leads to
consciously competent performance by the
providers.
• Medical Errors: Medical errors are human errors
that are reduced by utilizing effective training modules, and highly effective teams can reduce critical
error rates from 4 to 1 per event while cutting the
trigger time for a skill in half.
• Scene Philosophy Supporting Survivability: Scoop
and run vs. stay and play vs. scoop and treat are the
three choices as a philosophy. Utilizing the scoop
and treat philosophy maximizes survivability by
positively impacting the controllable elements in
the prehospital environment.
• Intubation: While presenting both sides of the evidence, pros and cons, for advanced airway management, it is most important to understand the
limitations of a studies design, and the correlation
and/or causation of the results to the conclusion.
Regardless, each agency must have an accurate
metric for your providers competency using all facets of airway management tools from basic to
advanced tracked not only from the training date
but also to patient outcome data. Until science is
conclusive and repeatable with a clear indication of
increased survivability, it appears the quality of
oxygenation and saturation is more important than
any specic procedure. Competency is paramount
in any airway management and remains a leading
cause of traumatic death.
• 10,000 Hours to Mastery: The quality of education
and training combined with the transferability from
the training environment to the real environment is
the most important concept to achieve mastery.
• Rescue Task Forces (RTF): They do not search but
will get known victims and start MARCH treatment
concepts for extraction to the Casualty Collection
Point (CCP). They are shored up with two Law
Enforcement personnel for protection in fourperson groups.
• Tactical Group and Contact Teams: Stage I is to
stop the killers, which will have law Enforcement
aggressively contacting the active shooter. Stage II
is subsequent ofcers will shift to a dual objective
deployment of stopping the dying, which includes
search to coordinate RTF rescue as well as addressing MARCH principles for hemorrhage control
while maintaining security of the scene backing up
the initial contact teams.
• Metrics: They need to correlate to benchmark trigger times for skills, add objective measures like
capnography with intubation or BVM ventilation,
and record the success or failure for each critical
skill performed prehospital. This data is then run
with outcome data to determine competency in the
eld.
References
1. Kuehl AE. Prehospital systems and medical oversight-national
association of EMS physicians. 3rd ed. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt
Publishing Co; 2002.
2. Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W, Munkley D, Spaite DW, Banek J,
etal. The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life
support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ. 2008;178(9):1141–52.
3. Liberman M. Advanced or basic life support for trauma:
meta-analysis and critical review of the literature. J Trauma.
2000;49(4):584–99.
4. Hoang TN, Kang J, Siriratsivawong K, LaPorta A, Heck A, Ferraro
J, Robinson D, Walsh J.Hyper-realistic, team-centered eet sur-

132
R. Shelton and M. Brock
gical team training provides sustained improvements in performance. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(4):668–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jsurg.2016.03.004.
5. Murray JA, Demetriades D, Berne TV, Stratton SJ, Cryer HG,
Bongard F, etal. Prehospital intubation in patients with severe head
injury. J Trauma. 2000;49:1065–70.
6. Bledsoe B.Rethinking ETI: should paramedics continue to intubate. JEMS. 2010;35(7):42–58.
7. Bernard SA, etal. Prehospital rapid sequence intubation improves
functional outcome for patients with severe traumatic brain injury:
a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:959–65.
8. Eckstein M, Chan L, Schneir A, etal. Effect of prehospital advanced
life support on outcomes of major trauma patients. J Trauma.
2000;48(4):643–8.
9. Meizoso JP, Valle EJ, Allen CJ, etal. Decreased mortality after prehospital interventions in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma
Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(2):227–31.
10. Lockey DJ, Healey B, Crewdson K, etal. Advanced airway management is necessary in prehospital trauma patients. Br J Anaesth.
2014:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu412.
11. Miraor E, Chuang K, Miranda MA, etal. Timing is everything:
delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in initially
stable trauma patients. J Surg Res. 2011;170(2):286–90.
12. Mayglothling J, Duane TM, Gibbs M, etal. Emergency tracheal
intubation immediately following traumatic injury: an Eastern
Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5):S333–40.
13. Cunningham P, Rutledge R, Baker CC, Clancy TV.A comparison
of the association of helicopter and ground ambulance transport
with the outcome of injury in trauma patients transported from the
scene. J Trauma. 1997;43(6):940–6.
14. Jacobs LM, Wade D, McSwain NE, Butler FK, Fabbri W,
Eastman A, Conn A, Burns KJ. Hartford consensus: a call to
action for THREAT.A medical disaster preparedness concept. J
Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):467–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jamcollsurg.2013.12.009.
15. Ross EM, Redman TT, Mapp JG, Brown DJ, Tanaka K, Cooley
CW, Kharod CU, Wampler DA.Stop the bleed: the effect of hemorrhage control education on laypersons’ willingness to respond
during a traumatic medical emergency. Prehosp Disaster Med.
2018;33(2):127–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X18000055.

Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound
inPrehospital andAustere
Environments
MichaelKreiser, SethHill, HunterBarnes, RyanShelton,
andAmandaToney
18
Introduction
The portability and relative affordability of point-of-care
ultrasound (POCUS) have made its use in the prehospital
environment an increasingly popular area of research.
European emergency medical systems (EMS) more commonly have physician responders, who have demonstrated
the efcacy of POCUS in prehospital care [1–3]. Despite this
utility, surveys of US and Canadian physicians found that
only 4.1% of EMS systems are using POCUS [4].
Recent studies have expanded prehospital ultrasound use
to non-physician healthcare providers, who demonstrated the
ability to obtain adequate scans, interpret images, and adjust
medical decision-making accordingly [5–7]. Successful
implementation of POCUS into EMS systems, with appropriate training and quality assessment of ultrasound images,
affords prehospital providers an additional tool to improve
team dynamics and healthcare provision. Critics point to pre-
M. Kreiser (*)
Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine,
Parker, CO, USA
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, USA
e-mail: michael.a.kreiser2.mil@health.mil
S. Hill
Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine,
Parker, CO, USA
The Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, USA
e-mail: seth.hill@rvu.edu
H. Barnes
Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine,
Parker, CO, USA
Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Cavazos, USA
e-mail: hunter.barnes@rvu.edu
R. Shelton
South Metro Fire Rescue, Centennial, CO, USA
e-mail: ryan.shelton@southmetro.org
A. Toney
Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of
Colorado and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
e-mail: Amanda.toney@dhha.org
hospital trials demonstrating delayed patient care with
POCUS, while proponents note trials that have implemented
the adjunct with minimal obstruction [5–9]. Integrating
ultrasound into EMS protocols clearly requires performance
metrics to ensure prociency.
Currently, the American College of Emergency Physicians
Ultrasound (ACEP) Guidelines advise a minimum of 25 ultrasound scans per body system prior to eld implementation.
These scans should be deemed of adequate quality and accurate
interpretation per POCUS expert overread [10]. Hands-on and
didactic training sessions have been completed over the course
of 4–8 h, with some training methods achieving prociency
retention rates of over 1year [11]. Additional objective measures of ultrasound prociency have been proposed through
hand motion analysis (HMA). Using the Focused Assessment
with Sonography in Trauma (FAST), differences in duration of
exams, quantity of hand movements, and distances traveled by
probes were statistically compared between ultrasound novices
and experts. Sonography prociency was found to have quantiable metrics from which expertise could be predicted [12].
The HMA technique was successfully trialed in the United
States to determine the efcacy of paramedic ultrasound
training. Prior to the training, POCUS fellowship- trained
physicians had signicantly better HMA measurements than
36 paramedics without POCUS experience. Following a 4-h
didactic and hands-on ultrasound course, paramedics attained
HMA measurements similar to experts, demonstrating the
capacity to learn and utilize POCUS.The need for refresher
trainings was also illustrated, as paramedics demonstrated
degradation in HMA metrics, written examination scores, and
objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) for cardiac
POCUS at 2-month and 4-month intervals [13].
Combining traditional simulation sessions with HMA could
raise the standard of ultrasound training and better prepare prehospital providers for eld implementation. Although training
metrics and best practice guidelines are still being standardized,
prehospital POCUS trials have already demonstrated improvements in patient care at point-of-injury in well-resourced, underresourced, austere, and military environments.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025
L. Marshall Gillman, S. Widder (eds.), Trauma Team Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86312-7_18
133

134
M. Kreiser et al.
Prehospital Ultrasound inWell-Resourced
Environments
Protocols Streamline Evaluation andPatient
Management
Well-resourced EMS systems often take an organized and
systematic approach to POCUS.This approach includes the
development and implementation of POCUS algorithms for
the prehospital setting. These protocols have adapted the
FAST exam, combined components of separate exams to differentiate shock and cardiac arrest, and dened methodology
for evaluating a mother and fetus.
The Prehospital Focused Assessment with Sonography in
Trauma (PFAST) was adapted from the hospital FAST exam.
Paramedics in a German multi-center study were able to complete scans on 90% of patients prior to hospital arrival with a
93% sensitivity for intraperitoneal hemorrhage [14]. All paramedics reported that PFAST played a crucial role in team
decision-making, with 33% describing changes in on-scene
trauma management and 20% noting change in receiving hospital. When a negative exam can be obtained in minutes and a
positive exam in only seconds, this protocol requires a small
investment for potentially large returns in team dynamics.
Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in
Trauma (eFAST) adds a pneumothorax and hemothorax evaluation to the FAST exam, and the protocol has been successfully deployed in the prehospital environment. One air
transport team found that scans obtained by ight paramedics
and ight nurses had approximately 100% positive and negative predictive values for torso trauma, which did not statistically differ from the receiving level 1 trauma center teams
who repeated the exam [15]. This categorization for blunt
trauma patients can help guide prophylactic aggressive treatment while the patient is still hemodynamically stable. In
addition to indicating appropriate therapies, POCUS was also
useful in avoiding unnecessary interventions and iatrogenic
injury when physical exam was misleading. This exam was
performed without effect on avionics and without distortion
[16, 17]. Prehospital eFAST completion times, performed by
aeromedical teams, ranged from 3 to 5min with a mean completion time of 3min [16]. The length of these assessments
added no meaningful transport time, and the aeromedical
teams reported instances in which massive transfusion protocols and surgical team notications were expedited [15].
Authors suggest that, in some scenarios, POCUS could provide sufcient assessment to forego time- consuming computerized tomography (CT) or surgical team re-evaluation on
arrival. This would allow for ight crews and receiving
trauma teams to jointly bypass the trauma resuscitation bay
and go direct to the operating room.
The Rapid Ultrasound for Shock and Hypotension
(RUSH) exam is a three-step algorithm described by Perera
and colleagues to evaluate undifferentiated shock [18]. The
protocol assesses “the pump,” “the tank,” and “the pipes,” in
succession by imaging the cardiac chambers and valves, the
lungs and inferior vena cava (IVC), the aorta, the abdomen,
and the large blood vessels, respectively. Specic ndings
for each system are noted and used to categorize shock as
hypovolemic, cardiogenic, obstructive, or distributive.
Prehospital providers are currently using components of this
algorithm through eFAST examinations and aortic evaluations for abdominal aortic aneurysms, and the protocol could
be adapted for the prehospital environment. The integration
could enhance diagnostic capabilities and improve the delivery rate and tness of resuscitative interventions, which may
require vascular access, volume resuscitation, vasopressors,
inotropes, thrombolytics, intubation, needle decompression,
pericardiocentesis, thoracentesis, cardioversion, or other
life-saving measures [15, 19].
Focused Echocardiographic Evaluation in Life Support
(FEEL) is an algorithm for improving resuscitative care currently used by German emergency medicine (EM) physicians
that has been deployed in the eld with a high degree of diagnostic accuracy [1]. The sequence focuses on reversible causes
of cardiac arrest, such as cardiac tamponade, pulmonary
embolism, ventricular dysfunction, hypovolemia, ventricular
brillation, and conditions missed by electrocardiogram.
Trauma may precipitate underlying causes of cardiac arrest,
making POCUS a valuable tool in discerning these conditions
during assessment of the trauma patient. Conversely, an underlying condition may cause a patient to experience trauma, such
as lightheadedness or loss of consciousness precipitating a
motor vehicle collision (MVC), and the FEEL protocol may
discover the more serious illness that might otherwise be
missed in the typical evaluation and management of an MVC
or other trauma. Prehospital physicians utilizing FEEL
reported POCUS-based patient management changes for 78%
of patients [1]. The physicians additionally reported detection
of pericardial effusions that were previously missed on exam
and ECG for 5.4% of patients, the ndings of which allowed
for rapid pericardiocentesis with improvement in survival to
hospital admission [1]. The discerning of treatable conditions
allows for the appropriate interventions to be more quickly
administered and may better prepare the medical teams at the
receiving hospital.
POCUS has also been used in prehospital environments to
assess obstetric trauma, a leading precipitant of maternal
mortality and still more frequent cause of fetal death [20,
21]. Trauma places the gravid patient at risk for placental
abruption, uterine rupture, preterm labor, and other emergencies. The Fetal Evaluation for Transport with Ultrasound
(FETUS) protocol has been trialed with an aeromedical team
examining fetal position, fetal movements, fetal heart tones,
placenta condition, and pelvic uid [17]. Assessing the sonoanatomy, fetal heart rate, and pelvic region with POCUS can

18 Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound inPrehospital andAustere Environments
135
determine viable pregnancies, while levels of free uid and
extent of subchorionic hemorrhage can determine good
prognosis versus surgical emergency. Signs and symptoms
of shock may not initially be apparent on physical exam, and
real-time imaging of the pelvis and abdomen can elucidate
fetal distress or maternal complications that indicate more
aggressive treatment for hemodynamic instability [22]. This
stabilization is integral to the health of the mother and
remains the primary means of protecting the pregnancy.
An Adjunct forAdversity
The prehospital environment can be unpredictable and poses
challenges to healthcare provision. POCUS has demonstrated utility as an adjunct to the physical exam, supplement
to the current diagnostics, and aid to the paramedic’s medical
decision-making. Physical examination is fallible when
compared to the more controlled environment of the hospital. For providers obtaining pulses on patients in cardiac
arrest, studies have demonstrated that manual carotid assessment is unreliable even in the more controlled setting of the
hospital [23, 24]. Prolonged pulse-checks delay chest compressions and can decrease survival rates [25]. Conversely,
false identication of an absent pulse may result in unnecessary CPR and resuscitative medications, which have been
associated with poor neurological outcomes [26]. POCUS
has helped discern cardiac contractility when the physical
exam is equivocal, a scenario not uncommon with the additional challenges of the prehospital environment [1, 5, 6].
Additionally, one random-controlled trial demonstrated that
carotid compressibility on ultrasound, a “POCUS pulsecheck,” had greater rst-attempt reliability than manual
assessment in obtaining pulses [27].
Because prehospital protocols and diagnostics are also
fallible, POCUS offers the provider more versatility for independent investigation. Although the FAST exam is a useful
algorithm in discerning the presence of uid in the chest,
pericardium, abdomen, or pelvis, a negative assessment may
conceal other serious complications of blunt trauma. A provider with high-suspicion for diaphragmatic rupture may use
M-mode to evaluate for liver sliding sign, subphrenic effusion, or absent organ sign [28]. Should internal hemorrhage
be suspected, hypovolemia may be assessed by examining
IVC diameter and low ventricular end diastolic volume [1,
22]. Studies have projected that up to 86% of cardiac arrest
patients initially thought to be in pulseless electrical activity
(PEA), based on electrocardiogram and physical exam, demonstrated cardiac motion on ultrasound [29, 30]. Pseudopulseless electric activity (PPEA) necessitates treatment that
differs from PEA, with improved survival [1, 31].
Paramedics are often faced with difcult decisions in the
eld, and POCUS has been shown to help guide medical deci-
sion-making [1, 14, 15, 31]. During the most critical calls,
such as mass casualty incidents (MCI), tactical emergency
medical services employ triage algorithms to prioritize, treat,
and transport patients. These situations can rapidly evolve and
require more than one triage effort. After the denitive patient
assignments have been made, POCUS can be employed to
evaluate patients with more ambiguous designations, resulting
in a more informed triage assessment and plan. The chest,
abdomen, IVC, and extremities, in acute triage (CAVEAT)
protocol, has been suggested as a triage tool to integrate several current ultrasound algorithms during MCI, but the protocol feasibility requires further investigation [32]. Termination
of resuscitation (TOR) is a mentally and emotionally challenging decision for both providers and families. Current research
suggests that cardiac standstill on ultrasound has a predictive
value as high as 97.5% for patient expiration [33]. Additionally,
a multi-center study found that cardiac activity on ultrasound
following cardiac arrest was the factor most associated with
survival [31]. This predictive value can supplement physical
examination to provide a more objective means of TOR.More
conclusive decision- making can offer closure to families,
while preventing futile emergency transports that would otherwise incur additional costs and risks to healthcare systems and
the surrounding community.
Prehospital Ultrasound inUnder-Resourced
andAustere Environments
Ultrasonography has progressed considerably with technological advancements, especially those in computer science,
instrument portability, smartphones, and the Internet. Such
advances are opening new opportunities to use POCUS technology outside of well-resourced hospitals and clinics. The
benets that ultrasound brings to rural and remote regions
are well documented. Recent discussions with midwives
throughout Tanzania highlighted that the technology enabled
them to make more informed assessments concerning their
patients and even encouraged pregnant women to deliver at a
medical center [34]. POCUS use in Rwanda and Liberia
inuenced medical management for up to 78% of patients,
while a study in Cameroon reported ultrasound as the reason
for diagnosis in 31% of patients [35–37]. Healthcare providers reported that these diagnoses were not previously on their
differential. Implementation of POCUS in the rural Amazon
echoes these ndings, suggesting that the diagnostic adjunct
may signicantly improve medical management [38]. A
resultant “Magnet Effect” has been documented in communities with ultrasound technology available. Patients had
more condence in the medical team and were more likely to
seek care when needed [39]. This ability to screen for internal bleeding, tumors, or other signicant ndings can ensure
a patient with a serious condition makes the necessary but

136
M. Kreiser et al.
sometimes challenging journey to a medical center.
Conversely, POCUS can also help healthy patients in rural
regions with minor ndings on ultrasound avoid unnecessary
travel and expensive procedures with potential complications [38, 40]. Introducing POCUS training and competency
programs to rural and remote regions of the globe offers an
invaluable tool that improves diagnoses and treatment
options for providers and patients alike.
The advantages of ultrasound in rural regions are signicant enough that the limitations may not be immediately
apparent. However, discussing limitations will help identify
how POCUS can improve to accommodate remote and sometimes austere environments. The rst limitation of ultrasound
in remote areas is that skilled operators are scarce in rural and
less economically developed communities. Performing and
interpreting ultrasound is a skill that, without training, is useless in practice. Different groups and organizations focus on
training local healthcare providers because few of the local
providers have prior training or experience [41–44]. Another
limitation to accessing ultrasound technology for rural regions
is lack of equipment. Even though ultrasound technology is
becoming less expensive and more available through mobile
computing technology, poorly funded areas still may have
only one instrument in an entire hospital or for an entire
patient population. The Tanzanian midwives that were interviewed, despite possessing a Doppler ultrasound device,
often resorted to a fetoscope because the only hospital
Doppler ultrasound was being used for a different patient
[34]. Furthermore, austere environments come with their own
set of challenges for maintaining and servicing ultrasound
equipment. High altitudes, lack of electricity and/or WIFI,
extreme temperatures, dirt oors, humidity, sea water, and
other environmental hazards may harm the delicate electronics in ultrasound devices. Repairing the device would require
delivery or travel to a servicing facility, the receipt of a servicing professional on- site, or additional servicing training for
the healthcare provider, each of which are inconvenient and
costly options for a remote community [38].
Despite current limitations, ultrasound is still valuable
and feasible in remote environments. The dearth of trained
personnel may be remedied by teleultrasonography or utilizing existing telecom infrastructure to both train students and
review images, as seen in studies in Peru and Ethiopia. The
research performed in austere regions of these countries used
low-bandwidth internet connections such as 3G, which permitted local ultrasound operators to receive instruction from
a physician in another country [44–46]. In locations where
even 3G is not available, satellite internet is gradually becoming a more viable option [47]. Geographic limitations of
ultrasound devices and access to equipment and repair can
be xed with smaller, more resilient device designs, as seen
in those used on Mount Everest [48]. However, there is not
yet a clear solution to repairing damaged ultrasound devices.
Currently, more durable and portable hand-held models are
being investigated as cost-effective options so that any damaged unit can be replaced, rather than sending large equipment for repair or bringing a specialist to the equipment [49].
Ultrasound and the increased use of teleultrasonography
will signicantly change healthcare team dynamics. Integrating
this technology into a community will provide medical teams
with additional insight into their patients’ health, which may
necessitate communication with additional healthcare workers
and systems to guarantee optimal care. Another team paradigm shift will involve telemedicine, which links remote providers with a network of colleagues and resources around the
globe. Rural practitioners will have new opportunities for
medical partnerships and trainings that were previously inaccessible. Consequently, a wider range of specialties and additional expertise will be made available to isolated communities.
Preliminary data supports the positive impact of ultrasound on
team dynamics, as current surveys report that the technology
empowers healthcare providers, improves job satisfaction, and
increases retention of skilled teams, all of which are challenges in austere environments [39].
Rural and remote regions traditionally have not had the
same level of access to ultrasound technology when compared to regions with more resources. However, the barrier to
access is changing with reduction in equipment size and cost.
The benets to patient care and medical team dynamics have
been demonstrated, and despite the current challenges of
training and equipment repair, ultrasound is rapidly becoming
more accessible, utilized, and integral in remote medical care.
Prehospital Ultrasound intheMilitary
The US military has utilized emergency POCUS since the
rst Gulf War in 1991. The technology has gradually evolved
in its deployment for tactical assessment of combat-related
injuries, non-combat-related trauma, guidance for procedures, and aiding resuscitation efforts. Since ACEP released
its rst guidelines on ultrasound use by Emergency
Physicians in 2001, the US military has continued to adapt
POCUS for its own use in remote settings [50].
Prehospital ultrasound provides a unique tool to help manage patients in the austere military environment. The practicality, versatility, and portability of ultrasound make this
technology ideal for the constantly evolving battleeld.
However, it is the accessibility of ultrasound that makes it an
ideal tool for dissemination among combat medics. The military has demonstrated that optic nerve sheath diameter (a noninvasive marker of increased intracranial pressure that can
present following traumatic brain injury) can be accurately
measured by novices after brief didactic and hands-on training
[51]. The importance of this technology to the military is evident by its role in Special Operation Medicine, where its
effects on team dynamics are even more pronounced. Special
Operation Forces (SOF) medics (Role 1 care) are trained in

18 Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound inPrehospital andAustere Environments
137
the application of this technology for use in the tactical setting.
In addition to diagnosis, the medics also employ POCUS for
real-time imaging in procedural guidance such as the removal
of shrapnel. In addition, POCUS has allowed for tele-imaging
from the eld to forward operating bases for expert review.
This real-time collaboration allows more exibility when it
comes to the mission at hand and more expedited care when
the service member returns to a Role 2 or higher facility (a
forward surgical team or beyond) [52].
With the advent of the Space Force and the increasing private
sector of space exploration, ultrasound is nding its place
among standard medical equipment on space shuttles. The
speed and clarity of relayed images in low orbit make the technology practical for telemedicine guidance from ight surgeons
at mission control [53]. Ultrasound has allowed for versatile
imaging on the International Space Station (ISS), and hand-held
models are currently being tested [54]. With limited weight and
volume capacities requiring judicious selection of cargo, this
transition to POCUS would be ideal. Sonography has been
employed clinically on the ISS, largely in evaluation of ophthalmologic, musculoskeletal, and vascular complaints. Ocular
changes associated with spaceight have been well- documented,
including globe attening, cotton wool spots, choroidal folds,
retinal thickening, and hyperopic shifts [55]. Ultrasound has
been used to evaluate optic nerve sheath diameter and central
retinal artery blood ow of crew members to conrm expected
microgravity shifts and rule out the need for intervention, which
could compromise a mission [54]. Microgravity also affects the
musculoskeletal system through gravitational unloading of
intervertebral disks, redistribution and alteration of muscle, and
demineralization of bone [54]. These effects decrease strength
and increase the likelihood of trauma during—and after—a
mission. Ultrasound has been used to evaluate the integrity of
the multidus and erector spinae muscles, as well as discern a
grade 1 biceps femoris tear. In the latter scenario, an astronaut
on the ISS experiencing an injury during physical conditioning
was suspected of having a ruptured biceps femoris. However,
ultrasound revealed only a minor tear, which decreased the
degree of management required [54].
Arguably the most signicant clinical use of sonography
in space ight medicine occurred when an astronaut with a
prominent left external jugular vein was examined.
Ultrasound imaging demonstrated an obstructive venous
thrombosis in the left internal jugular vein, the scans of
which allowed for a multidisciplinary collaboration on optimal therapy. After evaluating the risks of thromboembolism
versus anticoagulation without reversal agents aboard the
station, an enoxaparin regimen was initiated until apixaban,
protamine, and prothrombin complex could be delivered to
the station. The plan of care was successful, demonstrating
the efcacy of ultrasound in team-driven surveillance, diagnosis, and healthcare during spaceight [56].
Although clinical sonography has been documented, the
scope of space ight ultrasound is limited and largely
research oriented. Astronauts receive approximately 40h of
medical training, of which ultrasound comprises 3–4 h
[54]. This exposure is shorter in duration—with fewer
opportunities to practice—than many proposed EMS training programs for even an isolated system exam.
Furthermore, medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and
intervention capabilities are currently limited in spaceight, and even procient ultrasound diagnosis does not
guarantee healthcare solutions in many scenarios. Perhaps
the most limiting factor of clinical use is the minimal data
surrounding normal sonoanatomy in microgravity [54].
This incomplete understanding makes research a top priority before expansion of spaceight clinical applications.
Given these limitations, the gold standard of space ight
healthcare remains prevention, and intensive physical
requirements and screenings are most practical and costeffective [54]. However, the case reports validate the utility
of clinical ultrasound in spaceight, and improvements in
technology, training, and research will only increase its
future value as a space ight medicine adjunct.
Using prehospital ultrasound, the military changes the
team dynamics of its medical corps by allowing for the transmission of real-time images from the eld to medical control.
This capability has allowed for immediate management and
procedural guidance in austere conditions. During operations
that mandate radio silence, the SOF and Space Force teams
can make more informed medical decisions that improve triage while deployed. Other missions may nd soldiers unable
to return to the next level of care and require eld procedures,
a scenario not uncommon in military medicine. If the next
level of care is accessible, the provider can share images and
coordinate expedited care with the medical receiving team. In
military medicine, the medical corps is often understaffed,
requiring providers to assume multiple roles for adequate
healthcare provision. Prehospital ultrasound allows the receiving medical team advanced preparation for more organized
treatment on patient arrival. Furthermore, when the provider in
the eld is trusted and competent with ultrasound, the receiving team may agree to bypass the in-house triage system and
proceed directly to the operating room. This allows the military medical corps to streamline care, saving valuable time
and resources. Thus, POCUS improves the military medical
team dynamic through more appropriate and expedited care in
transit and more cohesive and resource-conscious care in facility. Prehospital ultrasound use in the military exemplies the
advantages of accurate, low-cost, portable, and versatile technology and how it enhances patient care.
Future Direction
Innovative applications of POCUS are constantly emerging.
The versatility of this technology has pioneered and optimized a variety of techniques in emergency and trauma med-

138
M. Kreiser et al.
icine, and this same transformation could extend to the
prehospital environment. Uses have been documented for
musculoskeletal, genitourinary, cardiovascular, pulmonary,
ophthalmologic, and neurological systems, with the potential
for numerous applications not yet established.
Trauma can result in a variety of musculoskeletal complaints, and high-frequency linear array ultrasound could be
a valuable adjunct in evaluation, stabilization, and pain management [28]. While life-threatening injuries typically indicate resuscitative efforts and rapid transport, lower acuity
patients may benet from additional evaluation and care onscene. POCUS can discriminate between pulsatile hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and aneurysm, which may lead to
different treatment algorithms. It can also detect hernias,
guiding reductions for patient comfort and incarceration prevention. If physical exam is limited by body habitus, swelling, or patient tolerance, ndings on ultrasound can safely,
reliably, and inexpensively discern the etiology [28]. The
hypoechoic foci of tendon and ligament tears differ from
arthropathic uid collections; soft tissue inammation distortion differs from the cortical disruption in bone fractures.
Understanding the source of musculoskeletal pain is crucial
to patient care and can help assess whether mild therapy is
appropriate or more signicant intervention is required, such
as long-bone fracture protocol at a trauma facility.
Furthermore, POCUS can guide fracture reduction by avoiding neurovascular compromise during bone alignment.
This increased imaging capability may expand therapeutic
options in remote or military environments, as the diagnostic
adjunct can also guide eld musculoskeletal procedures
necessitated by scarce medical assistance. Procedures such as
arthrocentesis, foreign body localization and removal, steroid
injection, nerve block administration, and other interventions
have been performed in hospital. Appropriate training could
adapt these techniques to remote environments, where
patients have signicant needs but limited options. Nerve
blocks may be especially useful for long transports and
manipulative procedures, providing improved localized pain
control without the adverse effects of narcotics.
Vascular evaluation and access are an integral part of prehospital emergency care, and POCUS could expand the scope
of practice and quality of care provided by paramedics. The use
of ultrasound-guided intravenous cannulation is a useful tool
for peripheral vascular access in patients with challenging body
habitus. When in-hospital ultrasound guidance was compared
to palpatory methods of peripheral intravenous cannulation,
ultrasound guidance had a greater success rate (97% vs. 33%),
shorter completion time (13min vs. 30min), fewer percutaneous punctures (1.7 vs. 3.7), and greater patient satisfaction [57].
Prehospital obstructions to peripheral vascular access may
exceed those of the hospital environment, yet ultrasound guidance is not a common practice in EMS systems. Using either
static or dynamic technique, POCUS can be used to gain access
to femoral, jugular, subclavian, or peripheral veins, as well as
intraosseous spaces, and studies have demonstrated decreased
attempts and increased rates of cannulation with minimal training [57, 58]. In addition to guiding the procedure, the imaging
can also serve as placement verication with color Doppler.
This additional step is crucial as some researchers note that
positioning is not accurately conrmed with presence of blood
aspirate or absence of extravasation [59].
Cardiothoracic and vascular procedures with greater risk,
such as arterial lines, central vascular access, pericardiocentesis, and thoracentesis including pneumothorax decompression, could also become more feasible and safer in the eld
with sonography to supplement the traditional use of anatomical landmarks. This utility extends to resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), an
intervention used to stabilize patients in hemodynamic shock
through temporary interruption of circulation to noncompressible hemorrhages. Animal studies have demonstrated that appropriate application of REBOA results in
74% reduction of mortality during hemorrhagic shock [60].
Ultrasound guidance in cadaver trials has been found to
improve incidence of correct zone placement, while decreasing the time to placement [61]. This approach could be
adapted to POCUS in the eld, potentially improving the
care for patients in hemorrhagic shock. Improved vascular
visualization and access could improve patient care with
more rapid administration of therapies, including necessary
uids, medications, and procedures.
Obtaining an airway in the eld may entail working in
imperfect environments on patients with challenging body
habitus, vomitus, trauma, and other obstructions. Endotracheal
tube (ETT) placement may have rst-attempt success rates as
low as 46%, and esophageal placements necessitate adjustment as quickly as possible [62]. However, physical exam can
be equivocal in the best environments, and X-ray conrmation is unavailable. The identication of bilateral lung sliding
and diaphragmatic excursion on ultrasound has conrmed
ETT position with 100% sensitivity and specicity, making
POCUS a useful adjunct in airway conrmation [63].
Furthermore, when ETT placement fails, ultrasound can help
obtain an emergency airway via cricothyrotomy. Manual palpation of anatomical landmarks can be unreliable, and studies
have found ultrasound guidance to improve success rates and
placement times of cricothyrotomy [64, 65].
Early detection and intervention are critical for stroke management. In ischemic stroke, earlier intravenous thrombolysis
has been associated with reduced disability and mortality.
Hemorrhagic stroke requires prompt surgical intervention, and
the time-sensitive nature of these life- threatening events has
produced many health system metrics and best practice guidelines regarding rapid patient management. Early studies have
suggested that transcranial sonography may have diagnostic
value in stroke [66]. Initial scans had a high sensitivity and predictive value for ischemic stroke when color Doppler was
applied to the temporal window. Researchers additionally noted

18 Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound inPrehospital andAustere Environments
139
high specicity for arterial occlusion, especially with use of
contrast agents [67]. Hemorrhagic stroke and vasospasm have
also been detected with ultrasound, but determining sensitivity
and specicity requires additional investigation [68]. Additional
research and training on POCUS could profoundly affect stroke
management. Stroke diagnosis can be delayed or missed. The
US medical consortium found that fewer than 38% of patients
with ischemic stroke reach urban academic medical centers
within the window for intravenous thrombolytics. While this
analysis considers the urban environment, rural populations
may face greater delays. With ultrasound, paramedics could
determine the stroke diagnosis and contributing etiologies in the
prehospital setting. Transport to the appropriate hospital and
mobilization of the appropriate teams would be signicantly
expedited. With appropriate training and protocols, intravenous
thrombolytics could be administered in the prehospital setting
to further improve patient outcomes. Some studies have even
proposed and trialed the use of sonothrombolysis as a means of
managing ischemic strokes [3, 69]. CLOTBUST researchers are
trialing a hands-free transducer that may be applied to the temporal window without the need for formal ultrasound training. If
sufciently developed, the technology could revolutionize prehospital stroke management [69].
Ultrasound has been utilized for ophthalmologic complaints of foreign body, globe rupture, lens dislocation, vitreous hemorrhage, and detached retina. While most of the
prehospital utility in these evaluations would come from a
more rapid notication of ophthalmologists and surgeons,
promising trials have used sonography to assess intracranial
pressure (ICP) [22]. Optic nerve sheath diameter measurements with ultrasound have a high sensitivity for elevated
ICP, and are a quick, non-invasive alternative to waiting for a
lumbar puncture or CT scan. Positive ndings would guide
prehospital care on scene, as well as communications to the
appropriate providers during transport, ultimately circumventing time-consuming and expensive diagnostics on arrival.
Although ultrasound often comes to mind for obstetrics,
the imaging modality is also useful in evaluating the male
reproductive organs. Testicular trauma may involve contusion, obstructive hematocele, fracture, torsion, hernia, or
dislocation. Both B-mode and Doppler are useful in discerning the injury location and severity, which can provide surgical teams advance time to prepare for emergency
interventions such as decompression, orchiopexy, and
repair. Quick activation of the surgical team is important to
prevent permanent damage or sterility, and POCUS could
facilitate this critical action [70].
Conclusions
Ultrasound is gaining popularity internationally, resulting in
frequent innovations. The technology is particularly promising in prehospital and austere environments, where versatil-
ity, durability, and mobility are crucial. Prehospital POCUS
remains a newly adopted skill, and the education system
will need to capture the breadth of POCUS application in
future core curriculum. However, paramedic-implemented
POCUS is already nding success at its most limited scope,
and user prociency will only improve. With appropriate
training, quality review of ultrasound images, and protocol
adherence, the adjunct allows for quick, inexpensive, lowmaintenance evaluation with decreased risk for iatrogenic
injury and ionizing radiation. This enhanced assessment
with decreased risk has been shown to improve diagnosis
and allow for more rapid administration of appropriate therapies. Real-time determinations improve emergency team
organization and surgical team activation, which, in turn,
improves patient care. Prehospital studies are currently
investigating associations between patient management
with POCUS and positive outcomes, including survival following cardiac arrest. Research has already shown high
diagnostic sensitivity, specicity, predictive value, and
patient management impact, demonstrating great potential
for POCUS in the prehospital setting.
With the technology being new to most prehospital providers, prociency is isolated to specic differentials and the
understanding of anatomy in isolated systems. As POCUS
becomes more commonly integrated into training programs,
paramedics will develop an expertise that allows for the
adjunct to be used as intended, a multisystem evaluation that
expedites diagnosis and treatment. With a linear progression
to POCUS mastery for complex interpretation, beyond the
isolated application currently seen with progressive agencies, future uses offer widespread utility. Prehospital application to both medical and trauma patients will mirror practices
in major trauma centers, expediting the delivery of more
appropriate therapies and optimizing team dynamics from
the eld to the hospital.
Key Points
• Standardized ultrasound training with performance
metrics is crucial to ensuring augmentation—as
opposed to impedance—of care.
• Groups who utilize POCUS report positive effects
on team dynamics and medical decision-making in
the prehospital setting.
• Sonography algorithms are expediting diagnoses
and directing management during shock, trauma,
and cardiac arrest.
• Expanding diagnostic capabilities of remote providers has improved resource allocation in austere
environments.
• POCUS can be a useful adjunct in forward-deployed
and aerospace settings, where laypersons can
receive telemedicine guidance to make missioncritical decisions.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
