Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5198_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
61 Мб
Скачать
130
R. Shelton and M. Brock
patient outcome. You must utilize the Hartford recommenda­tions when you train your crews. As Fire/EMS, we will need to operate in the yellow zones which are secure areas from within the building. By secure, I mean vantage points Law Enforcement has given us for the protection of corridors or hallways and/or we have cover if secure ground cannot remain constant. Law Enforcement will have contact teams ahead of us to attain threat contact and then engagement for threat suppression. Other Law Enforcement will be in the function of primary search inadvertently while clearing the building and are mandated to provide hemorrhage control to those in need as they nd them. Fire/EMS’s job is to go in for known patients at known locations that are relayed to us from Law Enforcement during their clearing and search ndings.
The concept of MARCH was developed by the Special Operations Forces in 1996 and has remained unchanged in Tactical Combat Casualty Care and Advanced Trauma Life Support, which outlines the preventable causes of death as follows:
M: Massive hemorrhage A: Airway R: Respirations C: Circulation H: Head injury and hypothermia
This remains the systemized approach that prioritizes life-threatening interventions.

Nonmedical Personnel

We will explore the role of non-medical personnel within the trauma team, and the roles and responsibilities of the medi­cal personnel within the trauma team that exist in the prehos­pital environment.
Bleeding control skills are taught in many rst aid classes. Non-medical rst responders such as police ofcers, re­ghters, schoolteachers, and motorists can all benet from hemorrhage control training. Members of the trauma team can teach members of the community effective hemorrhage control. According to the CDC unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death for ages 1–44. This information can help the trauma team target training courses to individuals who are within this age group or spend a signicant amount of time with individuals in this age group. In some US states, both public and private schools are required by law to train their faculty and staff in hemorrhage control and are required to have bleeding control kits with specic contents outlined within the law. Homeland Security’s national awareness campaign, “Stop the Bleed” curriculum, improved the lay­persons’ self-efcacy and reported willingness to use a tour­niquet in an emergency [15]. After a traumatic event, it is
likely the rst person on scene is not a medical professional. The potential impact of bystander intervention is signicant for trauma patients, given the majority of deaths occur before patients reach the hospital.

Conclusion

This is a critical time where effective trauma team dynamics can make a signicant impact on the receipt of appropriate, timely care of the traumatized patient. The trauma team dynamics extend beyond individual teams working on a patient to the macro environment of the entire trauma sys­tem. Each link in the patient’s chain of survival, from point of injury to hospital discharge, should be represented in an evidence-based discussion regarding the expectations of each link within the chain. You must capture preplanning and training on a continual basis as our effectiveness at executing protocols and ability to remain competent as low-frequency, high-risk skills have perishability. This discussion should assess the ability of the providers, equipment, stafng, capa­bilities of the receiving hospitals and dene standards of care that continue to evolve.
Key Terms
• Trauma team dynamics—a multidisciplinary trauma team focused on crisis management strate­gies to improve teamwork and communication.
• High-performance team—a group of people who work together to achieve exceptional results and outperform other teams. For effective teams, they must have trust, clear goals, well-dened roles, col­laboration, and phycological safety and are rooted in a learning culture.
• Waivered medication/procedure—beyond the acts allowed and scope of practice for the provider, which has a state waiver approved to allow acting above their initial training curriculum.
• Medical error—an adverse effect of care that could have been prevented.
• Immersive training—a learning method designed to mimic, as closely as possible, the environment the skills and team is expected to perform in with the intent to reduce human error, eliminate critical errors, improve trigger times, and build high perfor­mance teams in stressful environments.
• Rescue task force—a small team with a team leader, law enforcement for a protective element and EMS as the rescue element composing a 4-person team.
• Tactical unit contact team—eliminate threats in the hot zone.
17 Out-of-Hospital Care fromParamedical toNon-medical Personnel
131
• Active shooter hot zone—direct threat of the shooter and only tactical units are deployed in this area.
• Active shooter yellow zone—indirect threat where risk is mitigated by tactics of a rescue task force for protection or secured ground and corridors estab­lishing tactical advantage to facilitate the treatment and extraction of victims.
• Active shooter green zone—no threat and no need for tactical deployments and will be the location of unied command.
Key Points
• One team concept for trauma care: For the best patient outcomes, trauma surgeons must have ongo­ing education and training touch points with rst responders to deliver best practices and set expecta­tions for regional trauma care.
• Acts allowed by certication/licensure: With each level of certication or licensure, the scope varies widely for procedures and medication administra­tion. It is paramount to ensure protocols align with the providers skill level of competency and the resources available prehospital.
• Critical Care Paramedics: Focus on critical and intensive care that would otherwise be administered by a physician or nurse.
• Primary Causes of Death Prehospital: Hemorrhage, followed by chest and head injuries.
• Progression of Training Concepts: Drills and func­tions achieved, scenario training and functions achieved, and immersive training with functions achieved and mastery. This progression leads to consciously competent performance by the providers.
• Medical Errors: Medical errors are human errors that are reduced by utilizing effective training mod­ules, and highly effective teams can reduce critical error rates from 4 to 1 per event while cutting the trigger time for a skill in half.
• Scene Philosophy Supporting Survivability: Scoop and run vs. stay and play vs. scoop and treat are the three choices as a philosophy. Utilizing the scoop and treat philosophy maximizes survivability by positively impacting the controllable elements in the prehospital environment.
• Intubation: While presenting both sides of the evi­dence, pros and cons, for advanced airway manage­ment, it is most important to understand the limitations of a studies design, and the correlation
and/or causation of the results to the conclusion. Regardless, each agency must have an accurate metric for your providers competency using all fac­ets of airway management tools from basic to advanced tracked not only from the training date but also to patient outcome data. Until science is conclusive and repeatable with a clear indication of increased survivability, it appears the quality of oxygenation and saturation is more important than any specic procedure. Competency is paramount in any airway management and remains a leading cause of traumatic death.
• 10,000 Hours to Mastery: The quality of education and training combined with the transferability from the training environment to the real environment is the most important concept to achieve mastery.
• Rescue Task Forces (RTF): They do not search but will get known victims and start MARCH treatment concepts for extraction to the Casualty Collection Point (CCP). They are shored up with two Law Enforcement personnel for protection in four­person groups.
• Tactical Group and Contact Teams: Stage I is to stop the killers, which will have law Enforcement aggressively contacting the active shooter. Stage II is subsequent ofcers will shift to a dual objective deployment of stopping the dying, which includes search to coordinate RTF rescue as well as address­ing MARCH principles for hemorrhage control while maintaining security of the scene backing up the initial contact teams.
• Metrics: They need to correlate to benchmark trig­ger times for skills, add objective measures like capnography with intubation or BVM ventilation, and record the success or failure for each critical skill performed prehospital. This data is then run with outcome data to determine competency in the eld.

References

1. Kuehl AE. Prehospital systems and medical oversight-national association of EMS physicians. 3rd ed. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt Publishing Co; 2002.
2. Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W, Munkley D, Spaite DW, Banek J, etal. The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ. 2008;178(9):1141–52.
3. Liberman M. Advanced or basic life support for trauma: meta-analysis and critical review of the literature. J Trauma. 2000;49(4):584–99.
4. Hoang TN, Kang J, Siriratsivawong K, LaPorta A, Heck A, Ferraro J, Robinson D, Walsh J.Hyper-realistic, team-centered eet sur-
132
R. Shelton and M. Brock
gical team training provides sustained improvements in perfor­mance. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(4):668–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jsurg.2016.03.004.
5. Murray JA, Demetriades D, Berne TV, Stratton SJ, Cryer HG, Bongard F, etal. Prehospital intubation in patients with severe head injury. J Trauma. 2000;49:1065–70.
6. Bledsoe B.Rethinking ETI: should paramedics continue to intu­bate. JEMS. 2010;35(7):42–58.
7. Bernard SA, etal. Prehospital rapid sequence intubation improves functional outcome for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:959–65.
8. Eckstein M, Chan L, Schneir A, etal. Effect of prehospital advanced life support on outcomes of major trauma patients. J Trauma. 2000;48(4):643–8.
9. Meizoso JP, Valle EJ, Allen CJ, etal. Decreased mortality after pre­hospital interventions in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(2):227–31.
10. Lockey DJ, Healey B, Crewdson K, etal. Advanced airway man­agement is necessary in prehospital trauma patients. Br J Anaesth. 2014:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu412.
11. Miraor E, Chuang K, Miranda MA, etal. Timing is everything: delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in initially stable trauma patients. J Surg Res. 2011;170(2):286–90.
12. Mayglothling J, Duane TM, Gibbs M, etal. Emergency tracheal intubation immediately following traumatic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guide­line. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5):S333–40.
13. Cunningham P, Rutledge R, Baker CC, Clancy TV.A comparison of the association of helicopter and ground ambulance transport with the outcome of injury in trauma patients transported from the scene. J Trauma. 1997;43(6):940–6.
14. Jacobs LM, Wade D, McSwain NE, Butler FK, Fabbri W, Eastman A, Conn A, Burns KJ. Hartford consensus: a call to action for THREAT.A medical disaster preparedness concept. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):467–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jamcollsurg.2013.12.009.
15. Ross EM, Redman TT, Mapp JG, Brown DJ, Tanaka K, Cooley CW, Kharod CU, Wampler DA.Stop the bleed: the effect of hem­orrhage control education on laypersons’ willingness to respond during a traumatic medical emergency. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(2):127–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X18000055.
Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound inPrehospital andAustere Environments
MichaelKreiser, SethHill, HunterBarnes, RyanShelton, andAmandaToney
18

Introduction

The portability and relative affordability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) have made its use in the prehospital environment an increasingly popular area of research. European emergency medical systems (EMS) more com­monly have physician responders, who have demonstrated the efcacy of POCUS in prehospital care [13]. Despite this utility, surveys of US and Canadian physicians found that only 4.1% of EMS systems are using POCUS [4].
Recent studies have expanded prehospital ultrasound use to non-physician healthcare providers, who demonstrated the ability to obtain adequate scans, interpret images, and adjust medical decision-making accordingly [57]. Successful implementation of POCUS into EMS systems, with appro­priate training and quality assessment of ultrasound images, affords prehospital providers an additional tool to improve team dynamics and healthcare provision. Critics point to pre-
M. Kreiser (*) Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, USA
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, USA e-mail: michael.a.kreiser2.mil@health.mil
S. Hill Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, USA
The Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, USA e-mail: seth.hill@rvu.edu
H. Barnes Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, USA
Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Cavazos, USA e-mail: hunter.barnes@rvu.edu
R. Shelton South Metro Fire Rescue, Centennial, CO, USA e-mail: ryan.shelton@southmetro.org
A. Toney Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA e-mail: Amanda.toney@dhha.org
hospital trials demonstrating delayed patient care with POCUS, while proponents note trials that have implemented the adjunct with minimal obstruction [59]. Integrating ultrasound into EMS protocols clearly requires performance metrics to ensure prociency.
Currently, the American College of Emergency Physicians Ultrasound (ACEP) Guidelines advise a minimum of 25 ultra­sound scans per body system prior to eld implementation. These scans should be deemed of adequate quality and accurate interpretation per POCUS expert overread [10]. Hands-on and didactic training sessions have been completed over the course of 4–8 h, with some training methods achieving prociency retention rates of over 1year [11]. Additional objective mea­sures of ultrasound prociency have been proposed through hand motion analysis (HMA). Using the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST), differences in duration of exams, quantity of hand movements, and distances traveled by probes were statistically compared between ultrasound novices and experts. Sonography prociency was found to have quanti­able metrics from which expertise could be predicted [12].
The HMA technique was successfully trialed in the United States to determine the efcacy of paramedic ultrasound training. Prior to the training, POCUS fellowship- trained physicians had signicantly better HMA measurements than 36 paramedics without POCUS experience. Following a 4-h didactic and hands-on ultrasound course, paramedics attained HMA measurements similar to experts, demonstrating the capacity to learn and utilize POCUS.The need for refresher trainings was also illustrated, as paramedics demonstrated degradation in HMA metrics, written examination scores, and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) for cardiac POCUS at 2-month and 4-month intervals [13].
Combining traditional simulation sessions with HMA could raise the standard of ultrasound training and better prepare pre­hospital providers for eld implementation. Although training metrics and best practice guidelines are still being standardized, prehospital POCUS trials have already demonstrated improve­ments in patient care at point-of-injury in well-resourced, under­resourced, austere, and military environments.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 L. Marshall Gillman, S. Widder (eds.), Trauma Team Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86312-7_18
133
134
M. Kreiser et al.
Prehospital Ultrasound inWell-Resourced Environments
Protocols Streamline Evaluation andPatient Management
Well-resourced EMS systems often take an organized and systematic approach to POCUS.This approach includes the development and implementation of POCUS algorithms for the prehospital setting. These protocols have adapted the FAST exam, combined components of separate exams to dif­ferentiate shock and cardiac arrest, and dened methodology for evaluating a mother and fetus.
The Prehospital Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (PFAST) was adapted from the hospital FAST exam. Paramedics in a German multi-center study were able to com­plete scans on 90% of patients prior to hospital arrival with a 93% sensitivity for intraperitoneal hemorrhage [14]. All para­medics reported that PFAST played a crucial role in team decision-making, with 33% describing changes in on-scene trauma management and 20% noting change in receiving hos­pital. When a negative exam can be obtained in minutes and a positive exam in only seconds, this protocol requires a small investment for potentially large returns in team dynamics.
Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) adds a pneumothorax and hemothorax eval­uation to the FAST exam, and the protocol has been success­fully deployed in the prehospital environment. One air transport team found that scans obtained by ight paramedics and ight nurses had approximately 100% positive and nega­tive predictive values for torso trauma, which did not statisti­cally differ from the receiving level 1 trauma center teams who repeated the exam [15]. This categorization for blunt trauma patients can help guide prophylactic aggressive treat­ment while the patient is still hemodynamically stable. In addition to indicating appropriate therapies, POCUS was also useful in avoiding unnecessary interventions and iatrogenic injury when physical exam was misleading. This exam was performed without effect on avionics and without distortion [16, 17]. Prehospital eFAST completion times, performed by aeromedical teams, ranged from 3 to 5min with a mean com­pletion time of 3min [16]. The length of these assessments added no meaningful transport time, and the aeromedical teams reported instances in which massive transfusion proto­cols and surgical team notications were expedited [15]. Authors suggest that, in some scenarios, POCUS could pro­vide sufcient assessment to forego time- consuming comput­erized tomography (CT) or surgical team re-evaluation on arrival. This would allow for ight crews and receiving trauma teams to jointly bypass the trauma resuscitation bay and go direct to the operating room.
The Rapid Ultrasound for Shock and Hypotension (RUSH) exam is a three-step algorithm described by Perera
and colleagues to evaluate undifferentiated shock [18]. The protocol assesses “the pump,” “the tank,” and “the pipes,” in succession by imaging the cardiac chambers and valves, the lungs and inferior vena cava (IVC), the aorta, the abdomen, and the large blood vessels, respectively. Specic ndings for each system are noted and used to categorize shock as hypovolemic, cardiogenic, obstructive, or distributive. Prehospital providers are currently using components of this algorithm through eFAST examinations and aortic evalua­tions for abdominal aortic aneurysms, and the protocol could be adapted for the prehospital environment. The integration could enhance diagnostic capabilities and improve the deliv­ery rate and tness of resuscitative interventions, which may require vascular access, volume resuscitation, vasopressors, inotropes, thrombolytics, intubation, needle decompression, pericardiocentesis, thoracentesis, cardioversion, or other life-saving measures [15, 19].
Focused Echocardiographic Evaluation in Life Support (FEEL) is an algorithm for improving resuscitative care cur­rently used by German emergency medicine (EM) physicians that has been deployed in the eld with a high degree of diag­nostic accuracy [1]. The sequence focuses on reversible causes of cardiac arrest, such as cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism, ventricular dysfunction, hypovolemia, ventricular brillation, and conditions missed by electrocardiogram. Trauma may precipitate underlying causes of cardiac arrest, making POCUS a valuable tool in discerning these conditions during assessment of the trauma patient. Conversely, an under­lying condition may cause a patient to experience trauma, such as lightheadedness or loss of consciousness precipitating a motor vehicle collision (MVC), and the FEEL protocol may discover the more serious illness that might otherwise be missed in the typical evaluation and management of an MVC or other trauma. Prehospital physicians utilizing FEEL reported POCUS-based patient management changes for 78% of patients [1]. The physicians additionally reported detection of pericardial effusions that were previously missed on exam and ECG for 5.4% of patients, the ndings of which allowed for rapid pericardiocentesis with improvement in survival to hospital admission [1]. The discerning of treatable conditions allows for the appropriate interventions to be more quickly administered and may better prepare the medical teams at the receiving hospital.
POCUS has also been used in prehospital environments to assess obstetric trauma, a leading precipitant of maternal mortality and still more frequent cause of fetal death [20,
21]. Trauma places the gravid patient at risk for placental
abruption, uterine rupture, preterm labor, and other emergen­cies. The Fetal Evaluation for Transport with Ultrasound (FETUS) protocol has been trialed with an aeromedical team examining fetal position, fetal movements, fetal heart tones, placenta condition, and pelvic uid [17]. Assessing the sono­anatomy, fetal heart rate, and pelvic region with POCUS can
18 Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound inPrehospital andAustere Environments
135
determine viable pregnancies, while levels of free uid and extent of subchorionic hemorrhage can determine good prognosis versus surgical emergency. Signs and symptoms of shock may not initially be apparent on physical exam, and real-time imaging of the pelvis and abdomen can elucidate fetal distress or maternal complications that indicate more aggressive treatment for hemodynamic instability [22]. This stabilization is integral to the health of the mother and remains the primary means of protecting the pregnancy.
An Adjunct forAdversity
The prehospital environment can be unpredictable and poses challenges to healthcare provision. POCUS has demon­strated utility as an adjunct to the physical exam, supplement to the current diagnostics, and aid to the paramedic’s medical decision-making. Physical examination is fallible when compared to the more controlled environment of the hospi­tal. For providers obtaining pulses on patients in cardiac arrest, studies have demonstrated that manual carotid assess­ment is unreliable even in the more controlled setting of the hospital [23, 24]. Prolonged pulse-checks delay chest com­pressions and can decrease survival rates [25]. Conversely, false identication of an absent pulse may result in unneces­sary CPR and resuscitative medications, which have been associated with poor neurological outcomes [26]. POCUS has helped discern cardiac contractility when the physical exam is equivocal, a scenario not uncommon with the addi­tional challenges of the prehospital environment [1, 5, 6]. Additionally, one random-controlled trial demonstrated that carotid compressibility on ultrasound, a “POCUS pulse­check,” had greater rst-attempt reliability than manual assessment in obtaining pulses [27].
Because prehospital protocols and diagnostics are also fallible, POCUS offers the provider more versatility for inde­pendent investigation. Although the FAST exam is a useful algorithm in discerning the presence of uid in the chest, pericardium, abdomen, or pelvis, a negative assessment may conceal other serious complications of blunt trauma. A pro­vider with high-suspicion for diaphragmatic rupture may use M-mode to evaluate for liver sliding sign, subphrenic effu­sion, or absent organ sign [28]. Should internal hemorrhage be suspected, hypovolemia may be assessed by examining IVC diameter and low ventricular end diastolic volume [1,
22]. Studies have projected that up to 86% of cardiac arrest
patients initially thought to be in pulseless electrical activity (PEA), based on electrocardiogram and physical exam, dem­onstrated cardiac motion on ultrasound [29, 30]. Pseudo­pulseless electric activity (PPEA) necessitates treatment that differs from PEA, with improved survival [1, 31].
Paramedics are often faced with difcult decisions in the eld, and POCUS has been shown to help guide medical deci-
sion-making [1, 14, 15, 31]. During the most critical calls, such as mass casualty incidents (MCI), tactical emergency medical services employ triage algorithms to prioritize, treat, and transport patients. These situations can rapidly evolve and require more than one triage effort. After the denitive patient assignments have been made, POCUS can be employed to evaluate patients with more ambiguous designations, resulting in a more informed triage assessment and plan. The chest, abdomen, IVC, and extremities, in acute triage (CAVEAT) protocol, has been suggested as a triage tool to integrate sev­eral current ultrasound algorithms during MCI, but the proto­col feasibility requires further investigation [32]. Termination of resuscitation (TOR) is a mentally and emotionally challeng­ing decision for both providers and families. Current research suggests that cardiac standstill on ultrasound has a predictive value as high as 97.5% for patient expiration [33]. Additionally, a multi-center study found that cardiac activity on ultrasound following cardiac arrest was the factor most associated with survival [31]. This predictive value can supplement physical examination to provide a more objective means of TOR.More conclusive decision- making can offer closure to families, while preventing futile emergency transports that would other­wise incur additional costs and risks to healthcare systems and the surrounding community.
Prehospital Ultrasound inUnder-Resourced andAustere Environments
Ultrasonography has progressed considerably with techno­logical advancements, especially those in computer science, instrument portability, smartphones, and the Internet. Such advances are opening new opportunities to use POCUS tech­nology outside of well-resourced hospitals and clinics. The benets that ultrasound brings to rural and remote regions are well documented. Recent discussions with midwives throughout Tanzania highlighted that the technology enabled them to make more informed assessments concerning their patients and even encouraged pregnant women to deliver at a medical center [34]. POCUS use in Rwanda and Liberia inuenced medical management for up to 78% of patients, while a study in Cameroon reported ultrasound as the reason for diagnosis in 31% of patients [3537]. Healthcare provid­ers reported that these diagnoses were not previously on their differential. Implementation of POCUS in the rural Amazon echoes these ndings, suggesting that the diagnostic adjunct may signicantly improve medical management [38]. A resultant “Magnet Effect” has been documented in commu­nities with ultrasound technology available. Patients had more condence in the medical team and were more likely to seek care when needed [39]. This ability to screen for inter­nal bleeding, tumors, or other signicant ndings can ensure a patient with a serious condition makes the necessary but
136
M. Kreiser et al.
sometimes challenging journey to a medical center. Conversely, POCUS can also help healthy patients in rural regions with minor ndings on ultrasound avoid unnecessary travel and expensive procedures with potential complica­tions [38, 40]. Introducing POCUS training and competency programs to rural and remote regions of the globe offers an invaluable tool that improves diagnoses and treatment options for providers and patients alike.
The advantages of ultrasound in rural regions are signi­cant enough that the limitations may not be immediately apparent. However, discussing limitations will help identify how POCUS can improve to accommodate remote and some­times austere environments. The rst limitation of ultrasound in remote areas is that skilled operators are scarce in rural and less economically developed communities. Performing and interpreting ultrasound is a skill that, without training, is use­less in practice. Different groups and organizations focus on training local healthcare providers because few of the local providers have prior training or experience [4144]. Another limitation to accessing ultrasound technology for rural regions is lack of equipment. Even though ultrasound technology is becoming less expensive and more available through mobile computing technology, poorly funded areas still may have only one instrument in an entire hospital or for an entire patient population. The Tanzanian midwives that were inter­viewed, despite possessing a Doppler ultrasound device, often resorted to a fetoscope because the only hospital Doppler ultrasound was being used for a different patient [34]. Furthermore, austere environments come with their own set of challenges for maintaining and servicing ultrasound equipment. High altitudes, lack of electricity and/or WIFI, extreme temperatures, dirt oors, humidity, sea water, and other environmental hazards may harm the delicate electron­ics in ultrasound devices. Repairing the device would require delivery or travel to a servicing facility, the receipt of a servic­ing professional on- site, or additional servicing training for the healthcare provider, each of which are inconvenient and costly options for a remote community [38].
Despite current limitations, ultrasound is still valuable and feasible in remote environments. The dearth of trained personnel may be remedied by teleultrasonography or utiliz­ing existing telecom infrastructure to both train students and review images, as seen in studies in Peru and Ethiopia. The research performed in austere regions of these countries used low-bandwidth internet connections such as 3G, which per­mitted local ultrasound operators to receive instruction from a physician in another country [4446]. In locations where even 3G is not available, satellite internet is gradually becom­ing a more viable option [47]. Geographic limitations of ultrasound devices and access to equipment and repair can be xed with smaller, more resilient device designs, as seen in those used on Mount Everest [48]. However, there is not yet a clear solution to repairing damaged ultrasound devices. Currently, more durable and portable hand-held models are
being investigated as cost-effective options so that any dam­aged unit can be replaced, rather than sending large equip­ment for repair or bringing a specialist to the equipment [49].
Ultrasound and the increased use of teleultrasonography will signicantly change healthcare team dynamics. Integrating this technology into a community will provide medical teams with additional insight into their patients’ health, which may necessitate communication with additional healthcare workers and systems to guarantee optimal care. Another team para­digm shift will involve telemedicine, which links remote pro­viders with a network of colleagues and resources around the globe. Rural practitioners will have new opportunities for medical partnerships and trainings that were previously inac­cessible. Consequently, a wider range of specialties and addi­tional expertise will be made available to isolated communities. Preliminary data supports the positive impact of ultrasound on team dynamics, as current surveys report that the technology empowers healthcare providers, improves job satisfaction, and increases retention of skilled teams, all of which are chal­lenges in austere environments [39].
Rural and remote regions traditionally have not had the same level of access to ultrasound technology when com­pared to regions with more resources. However, the barrier to access is changing with reduction in equipment size and cost. The benets to patient care and medical team dynamics have been demonstrated, and despite the current challenges of training and equipment repair, ultrasound is rapidly becoming more accessible, utilized, and integral in remote medical care.
Prehospital Ultrasound intheMilitary
The US military has utilized emergency POCUS since the rst Gulf War in 1991. The technology has gradually evolved in its deployment for tactical assessment of combat-related injuries, non-combat-related trauma, guidance for proce­dures, and aiding resuscitation efforts. Since ACEP released its rst guidelines on ultrasound use by Emergency Physicians in 2001, the US military has continued to adapt POCUS for its own use in remote settings [50].
Prehospital ultrasound provides a unique tool to help man­age patients in the austere military environment. The practical­ity, versatility, and portability of ultrasound make this technology ideal for the constantly evolving battleeld. However, it is the accessibility of ultrasound that makes it an ideal tool for dissemination among combat medics. The mili­tary has demonstrated that optic nerve sheath diameter (a non­invasive marker of increased intracranial pressure that can present following traumatic brain injury) can be accurately measured by novices after brief didactic and hands-on training [51]. The importance of this technology to the military is evi­dent by its role in Special Operation Medicine, where its effects on team dynamics are even more pronounced. Special Operation Forces (SOF) medics (Role 1 care) are trained in
18 Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound inPrehospital andAustere Environments
137
the application of this technology for use in the tactical setting. In addition to diagnosis, the medics also employ POCUS for real-time imaging in procedural guidance such as the removal of shrapnel. In addition, POCUS has allowed for tele-imaging from the eld to forward operating bases for expert review. This real-time collaboration allows more exibility when it comes to the mission at hand and more expedited care when the service member returns to a Role 2 or higher facility (a forward surgical team or beyond) [52].
With the advent of the Space Force and the increasing private sector of space exploration, ultrasound is nding its place among standard medical equipment on space shuttles. The speed and clarity of relayed images in low orbit make the tech­nology practical for telemedicine guidance from ight surgeons at mission control [53]. Ultrasound has allowed for versatile imaging on the International Space Station (ISS), and hand-held models are currently being tested [54]. With limited weight and volume capacities requiring judicious selection of cargo, this transition to POCUS would be ideal. Sonography has been employed clinically on the ISS, largely in evaluation of ophthal­mologic, musculoskeletal, and vascular complaints. Ocular changes associated with spaceight have been well- documented, including globe attening, cotton wool spots, choroidal folds, retinal thickening, and hyperopic shifts [55]. Ultrasound has been used to evaluate optic nerve sheath diameter and central retinal artery blood ow of crew members to conrm expected microgravity shifts and rule out the need for intervention, which could compromise a mission [54]. Microgravity also affects the musculoskeletal system through gravitational unloading of intervertebral disks, redistribution and alteration of muscle, and demineralization of bone [54]. These effects decrease strength and increase the likelihood of trauma during—and after—a mission. Ultrasound has been used to evaluate the integrity of the multidus and erector spinae muscles, as well as discern a grade 1 biceps femoris tear. In the latter scenario, an astronaut on the ISS experiencing an injury during physical conditioning was suspected of having a ruptured biceps femoris. However, ultrasound revealed only a minor tear, which decreased the degree of management required [54].
Arguably the most signicant clinical use of sonography in space ight medicine occurred when an astronaut with a prominent left external jugular vein was examined. Ultrasound imaging demonstrated an obstructive venous thrombosis in the left internal jugular vein, the scans of which allowed for a multidisciplinary collaboration on opti­mal therapy. After evaluating the risks of thromboembolism versus anticoagulation without reversal agents aboard the station, an enoxaparin regimen was initiated until apixaban, protamine, and prothrombin complex could be delivered to the station. The plan of care was successful, demonstrating the efcacy of ultrasound in team-driven surveillance, diag­nosis, and healthcare during spaceight [56].
Although clinical sonography has been documented, the scope of space ight ultrasound is limited and largely
research oriented. Astronauts receive approximately 40h of medical training, of which ultrasound comprises 3–4 h [54]. This exposure is shorter in duration—with fewer opportunities to practice—than many proposed EMS train­ing programs for even an isolated system exam. Furthermore, medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and intervention capabilities are currently limited in space­ight, and even procient ultrasound diagnosis does not guarantee healthcare solutions in many scenarios. Perhaps the most limiting factor of clinical use is the minimal data surrounding normal sonoanatomy in microgravity [54]. This incomplete understanding makes research a top prior­ity before expansion of spaceight clinical applications. Given these limitations, the gold standard of space ight healthcare remains prevention, and intensive physical requirements and screenings are most practical and cost­effective [54]. However, the case reports validate the utility of clinical ultrasound in spaceight, and improvements in technology, training, and research will only increase its future value as a space ight medicine adjunct.
Using prehospital ultrasound, the military changes the team dynamics of its medical corps by allowing for the trans­mission of real-time images from the eld to medical control. This capability has allowed for immediate management and procedural guidance in austere conditions. During operations that mandate radio silence, the SOF and Space Force teams can make more informed medical decisions that improve tri­age while deployed. Other missions may nd soldiers unable to return to the next level of care and require eld procedures, a scenario not uncommon in military medicine. If the next level of care is accessible, the provider can share images and coordinate expedited care with the medical receiving team. In military medicine, the medical corps is often understaffed, requiring providers to assume multiple roles for adequate healthcare provision. Prehospital ultrasound allows the receiv­ing medical team advanced preparation for more organized treatment on patient arrival. Furthermore, when the provider in the eld is trusted and competent with ultrasound, the receiv­ing team may agree to bypass the in-house triage system and proceed directly to the operating room. This allows the mili­tary medical corps to streamline care, saving valuable time and resources. Thus, POCUS improves the military medical team dynamic through more appropriate and expedited care in transit and more cohesive and resource-conscious care in facil­ity. Prehospital ultrasound use in the military exemplies the advantages of accurate, low-cost, portable, and versatile tech­nology and how it enhances patient care.

Future Direction

Innovative applications of POCUS are constantly emerging. The versatility of this technology has pioneered and opti­mized a variety of techniques in emergency and trauma med-
138
M. Kreiser et al.
icine, and this same transformation could extend to the prehospital environment. Uses have been documented for musculoskeletal, genitourinary, cardiovascular, pulmonary, ophthalmologic, and neurological systems, with the potential for numerous applications not yet established.
Trauma can result in a variety of musculoskeletal com­plaints, and high-frequency linear array ultrasound could be a valuable adjunct in evaluation, stabilization, and pain man­agement [28]. While life-threatening injuries typically indi­cate resuscitative efforts and rapid transport, lower acuity patients may benet from additional evaluation and care on­scene. POCUS can discriminate between pulsatile hema­toma, pseudoaneurysm, and aneurysm, which may lead to different treatment algorithms. It can also detect hernias, guiding reductions for patient comfort and incarceration pre­vention. If physical exam is limited by body habitus, swell­ing, or patient tolerance, ndings on ultrasound can safely, reliably, and inexpensively discern the etiology [28]. The hypoechoic foci of tendon and ligament tears differ from arthropathic uid collections; soft tissue inammation dis­tortion differs from the cortical disruption in bone fractures. Understanding the source of musculoskeletal pain is crucial to patient care and can help assess whether mild therapy is appropriate or more signicant intervention is required, such as long-bone fracture protocol at a trauma facility. Furthermore, POCUS can guide fracture reduction by avoid­ing neurovascular compromise during bone alignment.
This increased imaging capability may expand therapeutic options in remote or military environments, as the diagnostic adjunct can also guide eld musculoskeletal procedures necessitated by scarce medical assistance. Procedures such as arthrocentesis, foreign body localization and removal, steroid injection, nerve block administration, and other interventions have been performed in hospital. Appropriate training could adapt these techniques to remote environments, where patients have signicant needs but limited options. Nerve blocks may be especially useful for long transports and manipulative procedures, providing improved localized pain control without the adverse effects of narcotics.
Vascular evaluation and access are an integral part of pre­hospital emergency care, and POCUS could expand the scope of practice and quality of care provided by paramedics. The use of ultrasound-guided intravenous cannulation is a useful tool for peripheral vascular access in patients with challenging body habitus. When in-hospital ultrasound guidance was compared to palpatory methods of peripheral intravenous cannulation, ultrasound guidance had a greater success rate (97% vs. 33%), shorter completion time (13min vs. 30min), fewer percutane­ous punctures (1.7 vs. 3.7), and greater patient satisfaction [57]. Prehospital obstructions to peripheral vascular access may exceed those of the hospital environment, yet ultrasound guid­ance is not a common practice in EMS systems. Using either static or dynamic technique, POCUS can be used to gain access to femoral, jugular, subclavian, or peripheral veins, as well as
intraosseous spaces, and studies have demonstrated decreased attempts and increased rates of cannulation with minimal train­ing [57, 58]. In addition to guiding the procedure, the imaging can also serve as placement verication with color Doppler. This additional step is crucial as some researchers note that positioning is not accurately conrmed with presence of blood aspirate or absence of extravasation [59].
Cardiothoracic and vascular procedures with greater risk, such as arterial lines, central vascular access, pericardiocen­tesis, and thoracentesis including pneumothorax decompres­sion, could also become more feasible and safer in the eld with sonography to supplement the traditional use of ana­tomical landmarks. This utility extends to resuscitative endo­vascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), an intervention used to stabilize patients in hemodynamic shock through temporary interruption of circulation to non­compressible hemorrhages. Animal studies have demon­strated that appropriate application of REBOA results in 74% reduction of mortality during hemorrhagic shock [60]. Ultrasound guidance in cadaver trials has been found to improve incidence of correct zone placement, while decreas­ing the time to placement [61]. This approach could be adapted to POCUS in the eld, potentially improving the care for patients in hemorrhagic shock. Improved vascular visualization and access could improve patient care with more rapid administration of therapies, including necessary uids, medications, and procedures.
Obtaining an airway in the eld may entail working in imperfect environments on patients with challenging body habitus, vomitus, trauma, and other obstructions. Endotracheal tube (ETT) placement may have rst-attempt success rates as low as 46%, and esophageal placements necessitate adjust­ment as quickly as possible [62]. However, physical exam can be equivocal in the best environments, and X-ray conrma­tion is unavailable. The identication of bilateral lung sliding and diaphragmatic excursion on ultrasound has conrmed ETT position with 100% sensitivity and specicity, making POCUS a useful adjunct in airway conrmation [63]. Furthermore, when ETT placement fails, ultrasound can help obtain an emergency airway via cricothyrotomy. Manual pal­pation of anatomical landmarks can be unreliable, and studies have found ultrasound guidance to improve success rates and placement times of cricothyrotomy [64, 65].
Early detection and intervention are critical for stroke man­agement. In ischemic stroke, earlier intravenous thrombolysis has been associated with reduced disability and mortality. Hemorrhagic stroke requires prompt surgical intervention, and the time-sensitive nature of these life- threatening events has produced many health system metrics and best practice guide­lines regarding rapid patient management. Early studies have suggested that transcranial sonography may have diagnostic value in stroke [66]. Initial scans had a high sensitivity and pre­dictive value for ischemic stroke when color Doppler was applied to the temporal window. Researchers additionally noted
18 Trauma Point-of-Care Ultrasound inPrehospital andAustere Environments
139
high specicity for arterial occlusion, especially with use of contrast agents [67]. Hemorrhagic stroke and vasospasm have also been detected with ultrasound, but determining sensitivity and specicity requires additional investigation [68]. Additional research and training on POCUS could profoundly affect stroke management. Stroke diagnosis can be delayed or missed. The US medical consortium found that fewer than 38% of patients with ischemic stroke reach urban academic medical centers within the window for intravenous thrombolytics. While this analysis considers the urban environment, rural populations may face greater delays. With ultrasound, paramedics could determine the stroke diagnosis and contributing etiologies in the prehospital setting. Transport to the appropriate hospital and mobilization of the appropriate teams would be signicantly expedited. With appropriate training and protocols, intravenous thrombolytics could be administered in the prehospital setting to further improve patient outcomes. Some studies have even proposed and trialed the use of sonothrombolysis as a means of managing ischemic strokes [3, 69]. CLOTBUST researchers are trialing a hands-free transducer that may be applied to the tem­poral window without the need for formal ultrasound training. If sufciently developed, the technology could revolutionize pre­hospital stroke management [69].
Ultrasound has been utilized for ophthalmologic com­plaints of foreign body, globe rupture, lens dislocation, vitre­ous hemorrhage, and detached retina. While most of the prehospital utility in these evaluations would come from a more rapid notication of ophthalmologists and surgeons, promising trials have used sonography to assess intracranial pressure (ICP) [22]. Optic nerve sheath diameter measure­ments with ultrasound have a high sensitivity for elevated ICP, and are a quick, non-invasive alternative to waiting for a lumbar puncture or CT scan. Positive ndings would guide prehospital care on scene, as well as communications to the appropriate providers during transport, ultimately circum­venting time-consuming and expensive diagnostics on arrival.
Although ultrasound often comes to mind for obstetrics, the imaging modality is also useful in evaluating the male reproductive organs. Testicular trauma may involve contu­sion, obstructive hematocele, fracture, torsion, hernia, or dislocation. Both B-mode and Doppler are useful in discern­ing the injury location and severity, which can provide sur­gical teams advance time to prepare for emergency interventions such as decompression, orchiopexy, and repair. Quick activation of the surgical team is important to prevent permanent damage or sterility, and POCUS could facilitate this critical action [70].

Conclusions

Ultrasound is gaining popularity internationally, resulting in frequent innovations. The technology is particularly promis­ing in prehospital and austere environments, where versatil-
ity, durability, and mobility are crucial. Prehospital POCUS remains a newly adopted skill, and the education system will need to capture the breadth of POCUS application in future core curriculum. However, paramedic-implemented POCUS is already nding success at its most limited scope, and user prociency will only improve. With appropriate training, quality review of ultrasound images, and protocol adherence, the adjunct allows for quick, inexpensive, low­maintenance evaluation with decreased risk for iatrogenic injury and ionizing radiation. This enhanced assessment with decreased risk has been shown to improve diagnosis and allow for more rapid administration of appropriate ther­apies. Real-time determinations improve emergency team organization and surgical team activation, which, in turn, improves patient care. Prehospital studies are currently investigating associations between patient management with POCUS and positive outcomes, including survival fol­lowing cardiac arrest. Research has already shown high diagnostic sensitivity, specicity, predictive value, and patient management impact, demonstrating great potential for POCUS in the prehospital setting.
With the technology being new to most prehospital pro­viders, prociency is isolated to specic differentials and the understanding of anatomy in isolated systems. As POCUS becomes more commonly integrated into training programs, paramedics will develop an expertise that allows for the adjunct to be used as intended, a multisystem evaluation that expedites diagnosis and treatment. With a linear progression to POCUS mastery for complex interpretation, beyond the isolated application currently seen with progressive agen­cies, future uses offer widespread utility. Prehospital applica­tion to both medical and trauma patients will mirror practices in major trauma centers, expediting the delivery of more appropriate therapies and optimizing team dynamics from the eld to the hospital.
Key Points
• Standardized ultrasound training with performance metrics is crucial to ensuring augmentation—as opposed to impedance—of care.
• Groups who utilize POCUS report positive effects on team dynamics and medical decision-making in the prehospital setting.
• Sonography algorithms are expediting diagnoses and directing management during shock, trauma, and cardiac arrest.
• Expanding diagnostic capabilities of remote pro­viders has improved resource allocation in austere environments.
• POCUS can be a useful adjunct in forward-deployed and aerospace settings, where laypersons can receive telemedicine guidance to make mission­critical decisions.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана