
- •Foreword
- •Table of contents
- •1. Executive summary
- •Overview
- •“Energy dominance” strategy
- •Deregulation
- •Energy infrastructure
- •Innovation
- •Power sector transition
- •Policy co-ordination
- •Energy security
- •Energy systems resilience
- •Key recommendations
- •2. General energy policy
- •Country overview
- •Supply and demand of energy
- •Primary energy supply
- •Energy production and self-sufficiency
- •Energy consumption
- •Energy trade
- •Institutions
- •“Energy dominance” strategy
- •Energy policies
- •Federal Power Act
- •Clean Air Act
- •National Environmental Policy Act
- •Natural Gas Act
- •Energy Policy and Conservation Act
- •Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •Energy Independence and Security Act
- •American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
- •Energy permitting and regulatory regimes
- •Energy pricing and taxation
- •Energy data
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •3. Energy and climate change
- •Overview
- •Institutions
- •Climate change mitigation
- •Emissions targets
- •Federal policies and regulations
- •Power sector
- •Transportation sector
- •Oil and gas sector methane emissions and natural gas flaring
- •Regional, state and local policies
- •Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
- •California’s climate action plan
- •Other regional programmes
- •Adapting to climate change
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •4. Energy efficiency
- •Overview
- •Institutional governance of energy efficiency policies
- •Transport sector
- •Energy consumption in the transport sector
- •Energy efficiency policies in the transport sector
- •Electric vehicles
- •Residential and commercial
- •Energy consumption in the buildings sector
- •Energy efficiency policies in the buildings sector
- •Tax credits
- •Building codes
- •Appliance and equipment standards
- •Co-generation
- •Federal buildings
- •Industry
- •Energy consumption in the industry sector
- •Energy efficiency policies in the industry sector
- •Demand response
- •Utility efficiency obligations
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •5. Renewable energy
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Renewable energy in TPES
- •Electricity from renewable energy
- •Policies and measures
- •Federal tax credits
- •Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
- •Renewable portfolio standards
- •Corporate tax policy
- •Trade policy
- •Net metering
- •Grid upgrades
- •Department of Energy initiatives
- •Solar PV
- •Grid Modernization Initiative
- •Hydropower Vision
- •Offshore wind
- •Battery storage
- •Renewable Fuel Standard
- •Biofuels tax credits
- •Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •6. Energy technology research, development and demonstration
- •Overview
- •Public spending on energy RD&D
- •Institutional framework
- •Energy RD&D programmes
- •Science and innovation programmes
- •National laboratories
- •Loan Programs Office
- •Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy
- •Nuclear energy
- •Energy efficiency and renewable energy
- •Efficiency
- •Renewables
- •Transportation
- •Fossil energy
- •Office of Clean Coal and Carbon Management
- •Advanced fossil energy systems
- •Carbon capture, utilisation and storage
- •Electricity
- •Pathways to commercialisation
- •Technology-to-Market
- •Energy Investor Center
- •Technology Commercialization Fund
- •STEM
- •International collaborations
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Crude oil production
- •Refined oil products
- •Trade: Imports and exports
- •Trade of crude oil
- •Trade of refined oil products
- •Oil demand
- •Increasing biofuels demand in the United States
- •Outlook of oil supply and demand
- •Prices and taxes
- •Institutions
- •Oil exploration policies
- •Oil exploration
- •Tax reform
- •Permitting and mineral rights
- •Infrastructure
- •Pipelines
- •Price differentials
- •Refining
- •Ports
- •Emergency response policy
- •Legislation and emergency response policy
- •National Emergency Strategy Organization
- •Oil emergency reserves
- •Storage locations
- •SPR modernisation programme, planned sales and commercial lease
- •Emergency response to supply disruptions
- •Impacts of hurricanes
- •Responses to hurricanes
- •Participation in IEA collective actions
- •Assessment
- •Oil upstream
- •Oil markets
- •Oil security
- •Recommendations
- •8. Natural gas
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Production
- •Consumption
- •Biogas
- •Supply and demand outlook
- •Trade: Imports and exports
- •Market structure
- •Price and taxes
- •Infrastructure
- •Gas pipeline networks
- •Ongoing projects in the Northeast and New England
- •Ongoing projects between the United States and Mexico
- •Recent regulatory developments related to the construction of energy projects
- •LNG terminals
- •Regulation
- •LNG developments
- •Storage
- •Gas flaring
- •Gas emergency response
- •Gas emergency policy
- •Gas emergency organisation: Roles and responsibilities
- •Gas emergency response measures
- •Strategic storage
- •Interruptible contracts
- •Demand restraint
- •Fuel switching
- •Assessment
- •Natural gas markets
- •Natural gas security
- •Recommendations
- •9. Electricity
- •Overview
- •Electricity supply and demand
- •Electricity generation and trade
- •Electricity consumption
- •Electricity system regulation
- •FERC
- •NERC
- •State regulators
- •The physical grid
- •Market structure
- •Wholesale electricity markets
- •Traditional vertically integrated utility bulk systems
- •ISOs and RTOs
- •Capacity markets
- •Energy Imbalance Market
- •Distribution system rates and competition
- •Ownership
- •Retail prices and taxation
- •Policies and regulations
- •Federal Power Act
- •Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act
- •Energy Policy Act of 1992
- •FERC Orders 888 and 889
- •FERC Order 2000
- •Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •Electricity in the low-carbon transition
- •Federal environmental policy
- •State-level clean energy policies
- •Renewable portfolio standards
- •Zero-emissions credits
- •Net metering
- •System integration of renewables
- •Transmission
- •Demand response
- •Energy security
- •Grid reliability and resilience
- •NERC assessments
- •DOE and FERC efforts
- •Capacity market reforms
- •Other capacity mechanisms
- •Fuel security
- •Extreme weather
- •Cyberthreats
- •Emergency response
- •The DOE role
- •Assessment
- •Bulk power markets
- •Electricity reliability
- •Recommendations
- •10. Nuclear
- •Overview
- •Institutional oversight and regulation
- •The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- •The Department of Energy
- •Operational fleet
- •Valuing low-carbon generation
- •Valuing resilience
- •New builds
- •V.C. Summer
- •Vogtle
- •SMRs and other advanced reactors
- •Nuclear fuel cycle
- •Interim storage and the Yucca Mountain repository
- •Production of enriched uranium
- •Accident tolerant fuels
- •Innovation, nuclear research, human resources, education
- •Versatile Test Reactor
- •Funding for nuclear innovation
- •Training nuclear scientists and engineers
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •11. Coal
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Institutions
- •Policy and regulation
- •Coal mining
- •Environmental regulations for coal-fired power plants
- •Fuel security
- •Emissions reduction efforts for coal-fired generation
- •Refined coal
- •Small-scale coal plants
- •CCUS
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •12. The resilience of US energy infrastructure
- •Overview
- •Definition of resilience
- •Institutional governance
- •Energy resilience policies
- •Incident emergency response
- •Exercises
- •Climate resilience
- •Energy production
- •Energy consumption
- •Energy infrastructure siting
- •Resilience in electricity
- •Resilience in oil and gas infrastructure
- •Upstream
- •Downstream
- •Midstream
- •Cybersecurity resilience
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •ANNEX A: Organisations visited
- •Review criteria
- •Review team and preparation of the report
- •Organisation visited
- •ANNEX B: Energy balances and key statistical data
- •Footnotes to energy balances and key statistical data
- •ANNEX C: International Energy Agency “Shared Goals”
- •ANNEX D: Glossary and list of abbreviations
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Units of measure

11. COAL
line” measures such as switching to cleaner power sources and demand-side management. In contrast, the replacement plan focuses on site-specific emissions cuts at individual power plants. The EPA’s ACE rule offers states several options for candidate technologies, though recommends heat-rate efficiency improvements at existing power plants as the BSER. The ACE rule also raises the threshold of plant upgrades that would trigger an NSR by using a benchmark of hourly emissions rates rather than an annual rate, thereby lowering the regulatory requirements for upgrading existing coal facilities. After finalisation in June 2019, the ACE rule may be subject to legal challenges by states and environmental groups, which could take over a year to reach conclusion. If upheld, the ACE rule will help prevent early closure of coal plants.
The administration in December 2018 also announced a proposal to revise New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for carbon dioxide (CO2), applied under Section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act. The NSPS rule has been in effect since it was finalised in 2015. The rule established an emissions threshold of 1 400 pounds (635 000 grammes) of CO2 per megawatt-hour (MWh) for new coal-fired generators, which would have required at least partial carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). The new proposal calls for a standard of 1 900 pounds (862 000 grammes) of CO2/MWh for large generators and 2 000 pounds (907 000 grammes) for smaller generators, which would not require CCS. Whether the rule has any material impact remains to be seen, as market conditions already disadvantage new coal plant construction, and none are under consideration currently.
Lastly, the EPA in 2018 also finalised its revision of the 2015 Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (also known as the coal ash rule) for coal plants, which govern how power plants manage coal ash waste from burning coal. The new rule relaxes requirements for plant operators and gives states and the industry more flexibility in waste management.
Fuel security
The DOE in September 2017 issued a notice of proposed rule making (NOPR) that urged the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to develop cost recovery mechanisms for baseload power generators that support grid reliability and resiliency. The proposal specifically called for grid operators, under the direction of FERC, to develop compensation mechanisms for baseload plants that have 90 days of fuel supply on-site, which primarily include coal and nuclear plants.
In response, FERC in January 2018 issued an order that unanimously rejected the DOE’s NOPR on the grounds that it did not provide sufficient evidence of supply risks to the grid. Instead, FERC opened a new proceeding on grid resilience, which is still under way, and directed regional grid operators to undertake a comprehensive, longer-term evaluation of grid resiliency as part of the proceeding (see Chapter 9, “Electricity”).
Emissions reduction efforts for coal-fired generation
The United States places an emphasis on technologies that improve efficiency and reduce emissions from coal-fired generation.
As part of these efforts, the DOE in January 2019 announced that it would fund USD 38 million for cost-shared R&D projects that improve the performance, reliability
241
ENERGY SECURITY
IEA. All rights reserved.

11. COAL
and flexibility of the existing coal fleet (but this funding will focus on efficiency improvements rather than CCUS) (DOE, 2019a).
Refined coal
Among the moves to make coal generation cleaner, Congress, under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, put in place a tax credit for refined coal production. Refined coal is coal that has been treated to lower emissions when burned, mainly by increasing mercury oxide production, which can then be captured by existing technologies in coal plants. In order to qualify for the tax credits, producers must certify that burning the refined coal results in 20% fewer NOx emissions and 40% fewer SO2 or mercury emissions compared with untreated coal. The tax credit is adjusted for inflation, and amounted to USD 6.91 per short tonne of refined coal produced in 2017 and USD 7.10 per short tonne in 2018 (EIA, 2019d). The EIA estimates that the production of refined coal grew in 2017 and likely grew again in 2018, accounting for a larger share of overall coal production at 21% over the first three quarters of 2018.
Small-scale coal plants
In August 2017, the DOE announced USD 50 million in funding for two pilot projects to develop transformational coal technologies, for which nine projects were shortlisted under Phase I in February 2018, focused on small-scale applications. Project finalists will move on to Phase II, focused on front-end engineering and regulatory clearances, while Phase III will focus on construction and operation (DOE, 2018).
In November 2018, the DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy unveiled the Coal FIRST (Flexible, Innovative, Resilient, Small and Transformative) initiative, with a focus on developing smaller, more efficient, modular coal plants (50 MW to 350 MW) that have near-zero emissions and are more flexible and better suited to the changing needs of the US grid (DOE, 2019b). These types of plants could also prove beneficial for export to less economically developed countries.
CCUS
The United States has been a leader in advancing CCUS technology for some time. The country has the largest number of large-scale CCUS facilities worldwide, though the bulk of current projects are focused on natural gas processing and industrial facilities rather than coal-fired power plants (for more details on CCUS, see Chapter 6, “Energy Technology Research, Development and Demonstration”).
As part of the Bipartisan Budget Act that passed in February 2018, Congress extended and significantly increased tax credits for CCUS under Section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code (see Chapter 6 more information).
The DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy directs the Office of Clean Coal and Carbon Management, which promotes R&D efforts that support the use of fossil fuels in more environmentally and economically advantageous ways. In the longer term, the administration expects that progress on CCUS technologies can be applied to both new and existing coal-fired power plants.
242
IEA. All rights reserved.