- •Foreword
- •Table of contents
- •1. Executive summary
- •Overview
- •“Energy dominance” strategy
- •Deregulation
- •Energy infrastructure
- •Innovation
- •Power sector transition
- •Policy co-ordination
- •Energy security
- •Energy systems resilience
- •Key recommendations
- •2. General energy policy
- •Country overview
- •Supply and demand of energy
- •Primary energy supply
- •Energy production and self-sufficiency
- •Energy consumption
- •Energy trade
- •Institutions
- •“Energy dominance” strategy
- •Energy policies
- •Federal Power Act
- •Clean Air Act
- •National Environmental Policy Act
- •Natural Gas Act
- •Energy Policy and Conservation Act
- •Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •Energy Independence and Security Act
- •American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
- •Energy permitting and regulatory regimes
- •Energy pricing and taxation
- •Energy data
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •3. Energy and climate change
- •Overview
- •Institutions
- •Climate change mitigation
- •Emissions targets
- •Federal policies and regulations
- •Power sector
- •Transportation sector
- •Oil and gas sector methane emissions and natural gas flaring
- •Regional, state and local policies
- •Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
- •California’s climate action plan
- •Other regional programmes
- •Adapting to climate change
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •4. Energy efficiency
- •Overview
- •Institutional governance of energy efficiency policies
- •Transport sector
- •Energy consumption in the transport sector
- •Energy efficiency policies in the transport sector
- •Electric vehicles
- •Residential and commercial
- •Energy consumption in the buildings sector
- •Energy efficiency policies in the buildings sector
- •Tax credits
- •Building codes
- •Appliance and equipment standards
- •Co-generation
- •Federal buildings
- •Industry
- •Energy consumption in the industry sector
- •Energy efficiency policies in the industry sector
- •Demand response
- •Utility efficiency obligations
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •5. Renewable energy
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Renewable energy in TPES
- •Electricity from renewable energy
- •Policies and measures
- •Federal tax credits
- •Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
- •Renewable portfolio standards
- •Corporate tax policy
- •Trade policy
- •Net metering
- •Grid upgrades
- •Department of Energy initiatives
- •Solar PV
- •Grid Modernization Initiative
- •Hydropower Vision
- •Offshore wind
- •Battery storage
- •Renewable Fuel Standard
- •Biofuels tax credits
- •Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •6. Energy technology research, development and demonstration
- •Overview
- •Public spending on energy RD&D
- •Institutional framework
- •Energy RD&D programmes
- •Science and innovation programmes
- •National laboratories
- •Loan Programs Office
- •Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy
- •Nuclear energy
- •Energy efficiency and renewable energy
- •Efficiency
- •Renewables
- •Transportation
- •Fossil energy
- •Office of Clean Coal and Carbon Management
- •Advanced fossil energy systems
- •Carbon capture, utilisation and storage
- •Electricity
- •Pathways to commercialisation
- •Technology-to-Market
- •Energy Investor Center
- •Technology Commercialization Fund
- •STEM
- •International collaborations
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Crude oil production
- •Refined oil products
- •Trade: Imports and exports
- •Trade of crude oil
- •Trade of refined oil products
- •Oil demand
- •Increasing biofuels demand in the United States
- •Outlook of oil supply and demand
- •Prices and taxes
- •Institutions
- •Oil exploration policies
- •Oil exploration
- •Tax reform
- •Permitting and mineral rights
- •Infrastructure
- •Pipelines
- •Price differentials
- •Refining
- •Ports
- •Emergency response policy
- •Legislation and emergency response policy
- •National Emergency Strategy Organization
- •Oil emergency reserves
- •Storage locations
- •SPR modernisation programme, planned sales and commercial lease
- •Emergency response to supply disruptions
- •Impacts of hurricanes
- •Responses to hurricanes
- •Participation in IEA collective actions
- •Assessment
- •Oil upstream
- •Oil markets
- •Oil security
- •Recommendations
- •8. Natural gas
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Production
- •Consumption
- •Biogas
- •Supply and demand outlook
- •Trade: Imports and exports
- •Market structure
- •Price and taxes
- •Infrastructure
- •Gas pipeline networks
- •Ongoing projects in the Northeast and New England
- •Ongoing projects between the United States and Mexico
- •Recent regulatory developments related to the construction of energy projects
- •LNG terminals
- •Regulation
- •LNG developments
- •Storage
- •Gas flaring
- •Gas emergency response
- •Gas emergency policy
- •Gas emergency organisation: Roles and responsibilities
- •Gas emergency response measures
- •Strategic storage
- •Interruptible contracts
- •Demand restraint
- •Fuel switching
- •Assessment
- •Natural gas markets
- •Natural gas security
- •Recommendations
- •9. Electricity
- •Overview
- •Electricity supply and demand
- •Electricity generation and trade
- •Electricity consumption
- •Electricity system regulation
- •FERC
- •NERC
- •State regulators
- •The physical grid
- •Market structure
- •Wholesale electricity markets
- •Traditional vertically integrated utility bulk systems
- •ISOs and RTOs
- •Capacity markets
- •Energy Imbalance Market
- •Distribution system rates and competition
- •Ownership
- •Retail prices and taxation
- •Policies and regulations
- •Federal Power Act
- •Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act
- •Energy Policy Act of 1992
- •FERC Orders 888 and 889
- •FERC Order 2000
- •Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •Electricity in the low-carbon transition
- •Federal environmental policy
- •State-level clean energy policies
- •Renewable portfolio standards
- •Zero-emissions credits
- •Net metering
- •System integration of renewables
- •Transmission
- •Demand response
- •Energy security
- •Grid reliability and resilience
- •NERC assessments
- •DOE and FERC efforts
- •Capacity market reforms
- •Other capacity mechanisms
- •Fuel security
- •Extreme weather
- •Cyberthreats
- •Emergency response
- •The DOE role
- •Assessment
- •Bulk power markets
- •Electricity reliability
- •Recommendations
- •10. Nuclear
- •Overview
- •Institutional oversight and regulation
- •The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- •The Department of Energy
- •Operational fleet
- •Valuing low-carbon generation
- •Valuing resilience
- •New builds
- •V.C. Summer
- •Vogtle
- •SMRs and other advanced reactors
- •Nuclear fuel cycle
- •Interim storage and the Yucca Mountain repository
- •Production of enriched uranium
- •Accident tolerant fuels
- •Innovation, nuclear research, human resources, education
- •Versatile Test Reactor
- •Funding for nuclear innovation
- •Training nuclear scientists and engineers
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •11. Coal
- •Overview
- •Supply and demand
- •Institutions
- •Policy and regulation
- •Coal mining
- •Environmental regulations for coal-fired power plants
- •Fuel security
- •Emissions reduction efforts for coal-fired generation
- •Refined coal
- •Small-scale coal plants
- •CCUS
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •12. The resilience of US energy infrastructure
- •Overview
- •Definition of resilience
- •Institutional governance
- •Energy resilience policies
- •Incident emergency response
- •Exercises
- •Climate resilience
- •Energy production
- •Energy consumption
- •Energy infrastructure siting
- •Resilience in electricity
- •Resilience in oil and gas infrastructure
- •Upstream
- •Downstream
- •Midstream
- •Cybersecurity resilience
- •Assessment
- •Recommendations
- •ANNEX A: Organisations visited
- •Review criteria
- •Review team and preparation of the report
- •Organisation visited
- •ANNEX B: Energy balances and key statistical data
- •Footnotes to energy balances and key statistical data
- •ANNEX C: International Energy Agency “Shared Goals”
- •ANNEX D: Glossary and list of abbreviations
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Units of measure
6. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
Committee on Energy Research and Technology (CERT) task force on TCP enhancement established in February 2018 (IEA, 2019b).
The United States was a founding member of the CEM, established in 2009. It hosted the first CEM conference, which convened energy ministers from major economies to promote the expansion of clean energy technologies globally. Following that, the country also hosted the seventh CEM in 2016 (Clean Energy Ministerial, 2019). The DOE acted as secretariat of the CEM from its start in 2009 until the function was handed over to the IEA in 2016. Currently, the United States is one of 26 CEM members (including the European Commission). Within the CEM, the United States is a leading country on ten programmes: 21st Century Power Partnership; International Smart Grid Action Network; Global Lighting and Energy Access Partnership; Electric Vehicles Initiative; Energy Management Working Group; Super-Efficient Equipment and Appliance Deployment Initiative; Clean Energy Education and Empowerment Initiative; Clean Energy Solutions Center; Nuclear Innovation: Clean Energy Future Initiative; and Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Initiative. It is also a participating country in an additional set of CEM programmes: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group, Advanced Cooling Challenge, Corporate Sourcing of Renewable Energy Campaign, Energy Management Campaign, and Global Lighting Challenge.
Through the DOE and its focus on early-stage RD&D, the United States is also a member of Mission Innovation (MI), as one of 23 founding countries (along with the European Commission). The United States hosted the first MI ministerial in 2016 and is a member of the MI steering committee. As part of MI, the United States participates in several initiatives, including: Smart Grids Innovation Challenge, Off-Grid Access to Electricity Innovation Challenge, Carbon Capture Innovation Challenge, Sustainable Biofuels Innovation Challenge, Converting Sunlight Innovation Challenge, Clean Energy Materials Innovation Challenge, Affordable Heating and Cooling of Buildings Innovation Challenge, and Renewable and Clean Hydrogen Innovation Challenge (Mission Innovation, 2019). In November 2018, the DOE announced up to USD 30 million in funding for novel and enabling carbon capture transformational technologies through MI. At present, the administration is reviewing its MI activities (Mission Innovation, 2018).
In addition to multilateral activities, the United States – through the DOE – is also involved in a number of bilateral RD&D initiatives. These include: the US-China Collaboration in Fossil Energy R&D; the US-UK Collaboration in Fossil Energy R&D; the US-China Bilateral Civil Nuclear Energy Cooperative Action; the US-India Civil Nuclear Energy Working Group; and the US-Japan Bilateral Commission on Civil Nuclear Cooperation (DOE, 2019q). The United States is also a participant in the International Cooperation in Methane Hydrate Research, the International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative and the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum.
Assessment
The United States is a global leader in public and private RD&D spending. The shale revolution was driven by innovation and public investment in RD&D and has benefited from the capabilities of the DOE, national laboratories, academic institutions and industry, which have brought about significant economic growth. Thanks to the uninterrupted strength of public funding for early-stage RD&D, the United States
121
ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION
IEA. All rights reserved.
6. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
continues, through the DOE and the national laboratories, to maintain worldclass facilities and collaborative consortia with industry and academia.
The 2017 National Security Strategy underlines the critical importance of understanding worldwide science and technology trends, attracting and retaining inventors and innovators, and leveraging private capital to maintain competitive advantages. The United States has a significant opportunity to replicate the shale revolution in other sectors, notably in emerging clean energy technologies and industrial process innovation.
In 2017, the United States spent 0.038% of its GDP on energy-related RD&D, according to IEA data. This was around the median among IEA member countries. However, based on absolute numbers, the United States is by far the largest energy RD&D spender. In 2017, the United States spent USD 7 289 million on energy-related RD&D, or 40% of the IEA total.
A Congressional Research Service study from 2018 found that over the period FY 2009-FY 2018, nuclear energy received the largest share of energy technology funding (28.6%), followed by fossil energy (20.8%), renewable energy (19.5%), energy efficiency (17.1%) and electric systems (14%, though a sizeable share of this came from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) (Congressional Research Service, 2018b). Public RD&D funding has been on the rise, which illustrates bipartisan support for US national laboratories as well as academic collaborations supported by public funding. However, demonstration funding has been in decline, as industry is expected to invest in these areas.
Since the last IEA review in 2014, the DOE has continued to expand the commercialisation of RD&D results, technology transfer, industry engagement through partnerships, benchmarking, output measuring and de-risking first-of-a-kind technology innovation. The USD 40 billion Energy Loan Guarantee Program and the establishment of the OTT in 2015 with its Energy I-Corps programme, the USD 26 million/year TCF and the EIC illustrate this renewed focus. The Loan Guarantee Program has resulted in USD 30 billion of investment in over 30 projects thus far, including in renewable energy, tribal energy, nuclear energy (Vogtle plant), advanced technology vehicles manufacturing and carbon capture and storage (Lake Charles Methanol facility in Texas).
Public funding for nuclear RD&D is becoming a priority, as reflected in the DOE budget, which saw an increase for nuclear spending. USD 1.3 billion is allocated for 2019 with a larger focus on the demonstration stage. The government prioritises support for technology innovation, in first-of-a kind plants, as a quarter of the current nuclear fleet is expected to retire before the end of their licences and investment in new reactors is not advancing.
The DOE has been active in promoting RD&D in advanced nuclear reactors and SMRs, and at engaging the private sector in cost-sharing partnerships. Funding for RD&D and licence application was made available to the NuScale SMR, which is currently undergoing design certification. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is also received funding from Congress to develop regulatory frameworks for advanced reactors. Under the Nuclear Innovation Capability Act, the DOE has been authorised to develop a new test reactor (Versatile Test Reactor) to be operational by 2026, and improve modelling and simulation capabilities. Together with public-private partnerships under the GAIN initiative, which would open access to research facilities for the private sector, strong
122
IEA. All rights reserved.
6. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
university programmes and targeted international collaborations, the United States aims at maintaining its leadership in nuclear technology.
The United States is the country with the largest overall participation in IEA TCPs, participating in 37 out of 38 TCPs as either a contracting party or a sponsor. The United States has a total of 47 participants from 28 distinct US entities (several TCPs see participation of more than one entity from the United States) with the DOE as the single largest participant (in 32 out of a total 47 US participants). US representatives hold a leadership position (chair/vice-chair) in 13 TCPs – about one-third of all TCPs – which illustrates the continuous relevance of the TCP mechanism for the current administration. The United States is also committed to foster the work of the TCPs going forward by co-leading the CERT task force on TCP enhancement established in February 2018.
As a founder of the CEM and a member of MI, the United States has plans to double by 2020 public RD&D spending in clean energy technologies. Besides its focus on advanced nuclear reactors and CCUS, however, since early 2017, all US participation in MI challenges as well as in CEM initiatives and campaigns have been under review, and funding for international collaboration has been reduced. The IEA encourages the government to dedicate funding and efforts to maintain a high level of international collaboration to ensure it can understand worldwide trends and retain a competitive advantage, in line with the National Security Strategy.
Recommendations
The US government should:
Promote innovation and cost reductions in CCUS and nuclear technology by modernising and building research facilities as well as initiating demonstration projects (for instance advanced reactor technology demonstrators), in collaboration with industry and targeted international partners.
Strengthen energy RD&D towards demonstration of critical technologies required to support the cost-effective growth of renewable energy. Based on the Grid Modernization Initiative, develop a roadmap for system flexibility.
Provide adequate support to international collaboration efforts of US national laboratories and DOE RD&D programmes to maintain global leadership on energy technology innovation.
References
ARPA-E (2019a), About (webpage), https://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=arpa-e-site-page/about.
ARPA-E (2019b), Projects (webpage), https://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=arpa-e-site- page/projects.
Clean Energy Ministerial (2019), About the Clean Energy Ministerial, www.cleanenergyministerial.org/about-clean-energy-ministerial.
Congress.gov (2018), S.97 – Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act of 2017, www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/97.
123
ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION
IEA. All rights reserved.
6. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
Congressional Research Service (2018a), FY2019 Appropriations for the Department of Energy, CRS Insights, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IN10868.pdf.
Congressional Research Service (2018b), Renewable Energy R&D Funding History: A Comparison with Funding for Nuclear Energy, Fossil Energy, Energy Efficiency, and Electric Systems R&D, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22858.pdf.
DOE (Department of Energy) (2019a), About Us (webpage), www.energy.gov/technologytransitions/about-us.
DOE (2019b), Funding Opportunities (webpage), https://science.energy.gov/fundingopportunities/.
DOE (2019c), Department of Energy FY 2020 Congressional Budget Request, www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/03/f60/doe-fy2020-budget-in-brief_0.pdf.
DOE (2019d), National Laboratories, www.energy.gov/national-laboratories.
DOE (2019e), 75 Breakthroughs by America's National Laboratories, www.energy.gov/downloads/75-breakthroughs-americas-national-laboratories.
DOE (2019f), Loan Programs Office, www.energy.gov/lpo/loan-programs-office. DOE (2019g), Title XVII, www.energy.gov/lpo/title-xvii.
DOE (2019h), Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), www.energy.gov/science-innovation/innovation/arpa-e.
DOE (2019i), U.S. Department of Energy Further Advances Nuclear Energy Technology through Industry Awards of $19 Million, www.energy.gov/ne/articles/us-department-energy- further-advances-nuclear-energy-technology-through-industry-awards.
DOE (2019j), Secretary Perry Launches Versatile Test Reactor Project to Modernize Nuclear Research and Development Infrastructure, www.energy.gov/articles/secretary- perry-launches-versatile-test-reactor-project-modernize-nuclear-research-and.
DOE (2019k), Secretary Perry Announces Financial Close on Additional Loan Guarantees During Trip to Vogtle Advanced Nuclear Energy Project, www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-perry-announces-financial-close-additional-loan- guarantees-during-trip-vogtle.
DOE (2019l), EERE Initiatives and Projects, www.energy.gov/eere/about-us/initiatives-and- projects.
DOE (2019m), Fuel Cell Technologies Office Accomplishments and Progress, www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/fuel-cell-technologies-office-accomplishments-and-progress.
DOE (2019n), Shale Research & Development, www.energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/oil- gas-research/shale-gas-rd.
DOE (2019o), U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Investor Center, www.energy.gov/technologytransitions/services/us-department-energys-energy-investor- center.
DOE (2019p), Technology Commercialization Fund, www.energy.gov/technologytransitions/services/technology-commercialization-fund.
DOE (2019q), International Cooperation (website), Office of Fossil Energy, www.energy.gov/fe/services/international-cooperation.
DOE (2018), Over $20 million to 10 national labs and 71 private sector partners for development and commercial deployment of promising energy technologies, www.energy.gov/articles/department-energy-announces-technology-commercialization- fund-projects.
124
IEA. All rights reserved.
6. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
Global CCS Institute (2018), The Global Status of CCS, https://indd.adobe.com/view/2dab1be7-edd0-447d-b020-06242ea2cf3b.
Greentech Media (2018), Can Updated Tax Credits Bring Carbon Capture Into the Mainstream? www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/can-updated-tax-credits-make- carbon-capture-mainstream#gs.16RTM80L.
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2019a), Technology Collaboration Programme (website), www.iea.org/tcp/.
IEA (2019b), Innovation (website), IEA, Paris, www.iea.org/topics/innovation/#rdd.
IEA (2018), Energy Technology RD&D Budgets 2018 [database], IEA, Paris, www.iea.org/statistics/.
Mission Innovation (2019), United States, http://mission-innovation.net/our- members/united-states/.
Mission Innovation (2018), $103 million funding to address the priorities of IC3, http://mission-innovation.net/2018/11/08/103-million-funding-to-address-the-priorities-of- ic3/.
NREL (National Energy Technology Laboratory) (2019), Energy Department’s Technology Commercialization Fund Helps Build a Bridge to Industry, www.netl.doe.gov/node/7570.
White House (2017), National Security Strategy of the United States, www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905-2.pdf.
125
ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION
IEA. All rights reserved.
IEA. All rights reserved.