Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Environmental Biotechnology - Jordening and Winter

.pdf
Скачиваний:
234
Добавлен:
10.08.2013
Размер:
7.9 Mб
Скачать

15.3 Sanitary Landfilling and Leachate Control Strategies 387

two parameters require a more comprehensive treatment technology or a combination of different treatment methods.

Current treatment facilities for the treatment of leachate mainly consist of several treatment methods to meet the limiting concentrations for the effluent. Typical combinations are shown in Figure 15.7.

15.3.7

Environmental Monitoring

Environmental monitoring is of extreme importance for the evaluation of landfill operational efficiency and for the observation of environmental effects on a longterm basis. The following monitoring facilities must generally be provided and checked at regular intervals for proper operation (TASI, 1993):

groundwater monitoring system with at least one measuring station in the inflowing current of ground water and a sufficient number of measuring stations in the current of ground water flowing out of the landfill area

measuring facilities for monitoring settlement and deformations in the landfill body and the landfill sealing systems

Fig. 15.7 Methods and combinations of methods often used for leachate treatment (Ehrig et al.,

1998).

38815 Landfill Systems, Sanitary Landfilling of Solid Wastes, and Long-term Problems with Leachate

measuring facilities for recording meteorological data such as precipitation, temperature, wind, evaporation

measuring facilities for collecting the quantities of leachate and water that are needed for analyzing the water balance

measuring facilities for recording the quality of leachate and other waters

In addition, if the generation of landfill gas is expected, it is necessary to provide facilities for measuring landfill gas and to install gas level indicators for the purpose of emission control.

15.4

Long-term Problems with Leachate

The characteristics of landfill leachate are relatively well known, at least for the first 20–30 years of life of the landfill, the period from which actual data are available. On the other hand, little is known about the leachate composition of later phases of the landfill, and the basis for making good estimates is rather weak.

For this reason, several landfills were investigated in a German joint research project ‘Landfill Body’ (Ehrig et al., 1997). The purpose was to describe the present stage of stability of landfills of different ages, their corresponding emissions, and the future development of emissions.

The main focus of the research program included long-term experiments in test lysimeters that were carried out to predict emissions that the solid waste in old landfills will release in the future.

15.4.1

Lysimeter Tests in Landfill Simulation Reactors (LSR)

To describe the effects of future biological and thermal pretreatment on leachate emissions, landfill simulation experiments were carried out under anaerobic conditions. The test system ensured that the typical landfill phases, such as the acid phase and the stable methane phase, took place in sequence in the reactor. Choosing appropriate milieu conditions enabled the researchers to achieve an enhanced biologic degradation process. By this means, the maximum emission potential represented by gas production and leachate load were determined within reasonable periods of time (Heyer et al., 1997; Stegmann, 1981).

The range of emissions in the water phase that can occur in the landfill in the future was based on experiments in four LSR lysimeters. Figure 15.8 shows concentrations of COD and TKN on a logarithmic scale during a test period of more than 1000 d:

The COD concentrations showed very similar qualitative declines that followed a gradual asymptotic course, which can be described as a function of dilution and mobilization. The BOD5 concentrations were very low as expected, because almost all waste samples were in the stabilized methane phase when the tests began. The BOD5/COD ratio was lower than 0.1.

15.4 Long-term Problems with Leachate 389

[mg L–1]

[mg L–1]

Fig. 15.8

CE = 200 mg L–1

CF = 70 mg L–1

COD and TKN: LSR leachate concentrations in waste samples from two landfills (Heyer et al., 1998).

There were striking differences in the magnitude of concentrations, depending on the age of deposition and the conditions within the landfill body before the sampling and because of varying waste compositions.

The time course of nitrogen emission was comparable to that of the organic parameters. However, the decline of nitrogen in the leachate occurred more slowly, because a higher portion of organic compounds became hydrolyzed during the

LSR test period. More than 90% of the TKN nitrogen was emitted as ammonia.

39015 Landfill Systems, Sanitary Landfilling of Solid Wastes, and Long-term Problems with Leachate

15.4.2

Prognosis of Periods of the Long-Term Time Course of Emissions

The time course of leachate emissions depends mainly on:

the potential substances that can be mobilized

the water balance in the landfill, mainly the water flux

the mobilization behavior

These LSR tests did not allow final, generalizing predictions for the development of emissions development with time. One reason was the specific conditions of each landfill site, e.g., the climate, the surface cover, the waste composition, and inhibition effects. Another reason was the high water exchange rate in the LSR tests that was used to simulate accelerated conversion, mobilization. and dilution in the landfill. However, the possible future development of emissions is discussed below.

The time course of emissions can be described with an exponential function. With the idealized conditions in the LSR test devices and the setting of a water balance, which was approximately 100 times higher than at the landfill, periods TE can be estimated, until a limiting value CE is reached. The estimations are based on the following assumptions:

constant climatic leachate generation of 250 mm per year (this means no impermeable surface sealing, only a permeable soil cover)

a standard height of 20 m

the dry densities in the LSR tests are similar to those in the landfill, approximately 0.75 Mg TS m–3

uniform percolation through the landfill body

Table 15.3 Estimations of periods TE for reaching the limiting values CE (Heyer, 2003).

Parameter

CE

C0

T1/2

TE

 

Limiting Value

Concentration

Half Life

Periods

 

 

at Test Start

 

 

 

 

[mg L–1]

[a]

[a]

 

 

 

 

 

COD

CE = 200 mg O2 L–1

500–12 700

10–40

80–360

 

mean

5100

28

140

 

 

 

 

 

TKN

CE = 70 mg L–1a

200–2100

15–57

120–450

 

mean

1200

43

220

 

 

 

 

 

Cl

CE = 100 mg L–1

340–2950

15–43

90–250

 

mean

1200

33

140

 

 

 

 

 

AOX

CE = 500 µg L–1

390–2380 µg L–1

14–42

30–210

 

mean

1600 µg L–1

22

80

a Total amount of nitrogen = sum of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate.

15.5 Controlled Reduction of Leachate Emissions 391

The periods TE are compiled in Table 15.3 together with the concentrations C0 at the beginning of the LSR tests and the half-life values T1/2.

According to German standards for COD in the leachate, the estimation results in a period of 80–360 years, with a mean of 140 years, until the limiting concentration of 200 mg O2 L–1 is reached. Chloride shows similar periods. All investigations and tests point to nitrogen as the component with the longest period of release of relevant concentrations into the leachate phase: 220 years on average may be necessary until a concentration of 70 mg L–1 is reached (Heyer, 2003).

The plausibility of these estimates is difficult to judge. Each landfill has a different water balance, which can vary with the seasons or change because of surface covers, lining systems, or damage to these technical barriers.

15.5

Controlled Reduction of Leachate Emissions

15.5.1

In Situ Stabilization for the Closing and Aftercare of Landfills

The main option for controlling leachate quality by controlling the landfill reactor is to enhance the biochemical processes (when biodegradable wastes are deposited). Then the question arises of how to positively influence the emission behavior of municipal solid waste deposits in such a way that the duration and extent of aftercare measures can be reduced. For this purpose, two principal in situ stabilization methods can be used, depending on the boundary conditions of landfills and old deposits (Fig. 15.9):

Humidification and irrigation methods, e.g., for younger waste deposits equipped with surface sealing and having a higher proportion of bioavailable organic material for the intensification of anaerobic degradation processes (Hupe et al., 2003).

Aeration methods, e.g., for older waste deposits or for deposits showing a lower proportion of bioavailable organic substances and decreasing landfill gas production.

Fig. 15.9 Methods for in situ stabilization with the goal of reducing aftercare.

39215 Landfill Systems, Sanitary Landfilling of Solid Wastes, and Long-term Problems with Leachate

15.5.2

Technical Methods for Water Infiltration and Effects on Leachate

Technical methods for water infiltration must be planned so that controlled, even moisture penetration of the landfill body is guaranteed. Likewise, short circuit currents and preferred seepage paths must be avoided by using suitable measures.

Various technical methods are available for use with regard to water infiltration into the landfill body. At the same time, the effect of the infiltration plants on existing surface sealing systems or on systems that are yet to be installed is of great importance. The choice of infiltration system is additionally determined by the quality of the infiltration medium (see above) and the quantity to be infiltrated.

Depending on the landfill boundary conditions and the targets of infiltration, the following infiltration methods may be used:

horizontal infiltration systems below the surface sealing system

two-dimensional infiltration methods

linear infiltration methods

vertical infiltration systems

use of existing vertical gas collectors

vertical deep wells

infiltration injectors in short screen distances

Combinations of the individual infiltration systems can be used. The experience gained so far with regard to controlled infiltration can be summarized as follows:

positive experiences

enhancement of gas production: up to three times higher

longer economic life of the gas

accelerated stabilization of the waste body and reduced leachate contamination

negative experiences

blockage and incrustation in the infiltration system

shearing, rupture, and buckling of pipes

uneven water introduction or no water introduction in subareas

15.5.3

Aerobic In Situ Stabilization and Effects on Leachate Contamination

Aeration processes for aerobic in situ stabilization are being used in several German landfills and old deposits with success. Common to all sites is the ultimate target: the controlled reduction of emissions and of the resultant risk potential of leachate within a relatively short period of time with the goal of economical site closure, aftercare, and securing measures (Heyer et al., 2003).

The basic technical concept of aeration consists of a system of gas wells, through which atmospheric oxygen is fed into the landfill body via active aeration in such a way that aerobic stabilization of deposited waste is accelerated. Simultaneously, the low-contaminated waste gas is collected and treated in a controlled manner by means of other gas wells.

15.5 Controlled Reduction of Leachate Emissions 393

In principle, the following processes occur during aeration in the landfill body:

A change from anaerobic to aerobic conditions takes place, resulting in an accelerated and, in part, broader degradation of the bioavailable waste components. The increased carbon conversion during in situ aeration therefore leads to faster stabilization of organic substances.

At the end of the stabilization process, organic compounds consist of only nearly or completely nondegradable compounds with very low residual gas potential.

In the leachate path, accelerated decrease in the parameters COD and, above all, BOD5, as well as in nitrogen (TKN or NH4-N) occurs with the aerobic degradation of organic compounds and their release into the gas phase (mainly as carbon dioxide) as a result of aeration.

Compared with strictly anaerobic conditions, the aftercare periods for the leachate emission path are reduced by at least several decades by in situ aeration. The aftercare phase is not considered complete after aeration has been terminated, but aftercare expenses are significantly reduced, since costly leachate purification measures can be terminated earlier. If leachate percolates directly into the underground, as sometimes occurs in old deposits lacking sealing and drainage systems for the collection of leachate, the polluting effects would be considerably lower.

In situ aeration is planned to operate for a period of 2–4 years under average landfill conditions. Meanwhile, results and experience concerning the operation of stabilization measures are available for several sites for a period of 2–3 years (Heyer et al., 2003). Figure 15.10 shows, as an example, the development of nitrogen contamination in the leachate and groundwater off-flow from an old landfill. From the outset of aeration in April 2001, a considerable decrease in the nitrogen contamination can be seen after one year of stabilization, in spite of several deviations.

Fig. 15.10 Changes in leachate contamination within the off-flow area during aerobic in situ stabilization of the old Kuhstedt waste deposit (Heyer et al., 2003).

39415 Landfill Systems, Sanitary Landfilling of Solid Wastes, and Long-term Problems with Leachate

References

ABFABLV, Abfallablagerungsverordnung (German Waste Disposal Regulation). Verordnung über die umweltverträgliche Ablagerung von Siedlungsabfällen (Regulation for the Environmentally Compatible Disposal of MSW). March 2001

ABWV, Abwasserverordnung (German Waste Water Ordinance, 1997), Verordnung über Anforderungen an das Einleiten von Abwasser in Gewässer vom 21. März 1997

Andreottola, G., Chemical and biological characteristics of landfill leachate, in: Land- filling of Waste: Leachate (Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. eds.), pp. 65–88, London 1992: Elsevier.

Barber, C., Behaviour of Wastes in Landfills, Review of Processes of Decomposition of Solid Wastes with Particular Reference to Microbiological Changes and Gas Production, Stevenage 1979: Water Research Centre, Stevenage Laboratory Report LR 1059.

Belevi, H., Baccini, P., Long-term behaviour of municipal solid waste landfills, Waste Manag. Res. 1989, 7, 483–499.

Christensen, T.H., Kjeldsen, P., Basic biochemical processes in landfills, in: Sanitary Landfilling: Process, Technology and Environmental Impact (Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. eds.), pp. 29–49, London 1989: Academic Press.

DepV, Deponieverordnung (German Landfill Ordinance, 2002), Verordnung über Deponien und Langzeitlager: in der Fassung des Beschlusses des Bundeskabinetts vom 24. Juli 2002, BGBl I 2002, 2807

European Council, Council Directive 1999/ 31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the Landfill of Waste, European Council, Official Journal of the European Communities L 182 (1999)

Ehrig, H.-J., Qualität und Quantität von Deponiesickerwasser, Entsorgungsprax. Spez.

1990, 1, 100–105

Ehrig, H.-J., Einführung in das Verbundvorhaben Deponiekörper, in: Verbundvorhaben Deponiekörper, Proceedings of 2. Statusseminar, Wuppertal 1997, pp. 1–5, Umweltbundesamt, Projektträgerschaft Abfallwirtschaft und Altlastensanierung des BMBF.

Ehrig, H.-J., Stegmann, R., Biological processes, in: Landfilling of Waste: Leachate (Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. eds.), pp. 185–202, London 1992: Elsevier.

Heyer K.-U., Emissionsreduzierung in der Deponienachsorge. Hamburger Berichte, Band 21, Stegmann (ed), Stuttgart 2003: Verlag Abfall aktuell.

Heyer, K.-U., Stegmann, R., Untersuchungen zum langfristigen Stabilisierungsverlauf von Siedlungsabfalldeponien, in: Verbundvorhaben Deponiekörper, Proceedings of 2. Statusseminar, Wuppertal 1997, pp. 46–78, Umweltbundesamt, Projektträgerschaft Abfallwirtschaft und Altlastensanierung des BMBF.

Heyer K.-U., Hupe K., Koop A., Ritzkowski M. & Stegmann R., The low pressure aeration of landfills: experiences, operation, costs. Pro- ceedings Sardinia 2003, (Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. eds), CISA, Cagliari, Italy 2003

Hupe K., Heyer K.-U., Stegmann R., Water infiltration for enhanced in situ stabilization.

Proceedings Sardinia Symposium 2003, (Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. eds), CISA, Cagliari, Italy 2003

Kruse, K., Langfristiges Emissionsgeschehen von Siedlungsabfalldeponien, Heft 54 der Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft, Braunschweig 1994: Technische Universität.

Robinson, H.D., Development of methanogenic conditions within landfill, Proceedings 2nd International Landfill Symposium Sardinia ’89, Porto Conte 1989, October 9–13.

Stegmann, R., Beschreibung eines Verfahrens zur Untersuchung anaerober Umsetzungsprozesse von festen Abfallstoffen im Deponiekörper, Müll Abfall 1981, 2.

Stegmann, R., Spendlin, H.H., Enhancement of degradation: German experiences, in: San- itary Landfilling: Process, Technology and Environmental Impact, (Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. eds.), pp. 61–82, London 1989: Academic Press.

Stegmann, R., Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Landfill leachate: an introduction, in: Land- filling of Waste: Leachate (Christensen, T.H., Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. eds.), pp. 3–14, London 1992: Elsevier.

TASI, Technical Instructions on Waste from Human Settlements (TA Siedlungsabfall), Dritte Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Abfallgesetz vom 14. Mai 1993, Technische Anleitung zur Verwertung, Behandlung und sonstigen Entsorgung von Siedlungsabfällen, Bundesanzeiger Nr. 99a, 1993

395

16

Sanitary Landfills: Long-term Stability and Environmental Implications

Michael S. Switzenbaum

16.1 Introduction

Our society generates significant quantities of municipal solid waste. According to Tchobanoglous et al. (1991), solid wastes comprise all the wastes arising from human and animal activities that are normally solid and that are discarded or unwanted. Municipal solid waste is usually assumed to include all community wastes (residential, commercial, institutional, construction and demolition, and municipal services) and does not include industrial and agricultural sources. Although municipal solid waste is only a relatively small fraction of the total amount of solid waste generated, proper management is essential for the control of disease vectors and for protection of the environment.

In the United States, about 1.9 × 1011 kg (210 × 106 t) of municipal solid waste are generated per year. The per capita generation rate is about 2 kg (4.4 lb) per person per day (U. S. EPA, 1997b). These rates have vastly increased over the past 30–40 years, but are now starting to level off or even slightly decrease (Fig. 16.1). Generation rates in the United States are considerably higher than generation rates in European countries.

Fig. 16.1 Municipal solid waste generation rates, 1960–2000 (U.S. EPA, 1997a).

Environmental Biotechnology. Concepts and Applications. Edited by H.-J. Jördening and J. Winter Copyright © 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

ISBN: 3-527-30585-8

396 16 Sanitary Landfills: Long-term Stability and Environmental Implications

Fig. 16.2 Total and net waste generation, 1960–2000 (U.S. EPA, 1997a).

Because of recycling efforts, the net generation rate has been decreasing (Fig. 16.2). Net generation is the amount of solid waste remaining from the total amount generated after materials such as newspaper, glass, and aluminum have been recovered by recycling activities.

Municipal solid waste is a heterogeneous mixture of the materials that society uses. General categories include food wastes, paper, cardboard, plastics, textiles, rubber, leather, yard wastes, wood, glass, ‘tin’ cans, and ferrous metals.

The standard unit for reporting waste generation is mass. However, mass data are of limited value for certain applications such as landfill design, since average landfill requirements depend on the volume of waste. In addition to the original density of any materials making up the solid waste mixture, the volume also depends on how much the waste has been compacted (Table 16.1).

The comparative percentages of various components of the waste stream are variable. Composition varies geographically and is also influenced by efforts in source reduction and recycling (Table 16.2).

In summary, large amounts of municipal solid waste are generated, and the waste is diverse in nature. These wastes must be managed for the control of disease vectors and for protection of the environment.

Table 16.1 Density of municipal solid waste as influenced by compaction (according to Tchobanoglous et al., 1991).

Component

Density (kg m–3)

 

 

Residential

130

In compactor truck

300

In landfill (normal)

450

In landfill (well compacted)

590

Baled

700