Файловый архив студентов. Файловый архив студентов.
1329 вузов, 5502 предметов.
/ Регистрация
FAQ Обратная связь Вопросы и предложения
Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Башкирский Государственный Аграрный Университет
Предмет:
[НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]
Файл:

Обеспечительные меры в практике международных судов и трибуналов. Монография

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
07.09.2026
Размер:
2 Мб
Скачать
☆
Библиография
245. Bismuth, R. Anatomy of the Law and Practice of Interim Protective Measures in International Investment Arbitration / R. Bismuth // Journal of International Arbitration. — 2009. — Vol. 26. — No. 6. — P. 773–821.
246. Brown, C. Inherent Powers in International Adjudication / C. Brown // The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication / C. Ro­mano, K.J. Alter, Y. Shany (eds.), 2013. — P. 828–847.
247. Burbano-Herrera, C. Non-Compliance With a Provisional Measure Automatically Leads To a Violation of the Right of Individual Application… or Doesn’t it? Strasbourg Court Takes Away any Remaining Doubts and Broadens Its Pan-European Protection / C. Burbano-Herrera, Y. Haeck, L. Zwaak // European Constitutional Law Review. — 2008. — Vol. 4. — № 1. — P. 41–63.
248. Burbano-Herrera, C. Letting States off the Hook? The Paradox of the Legal Consequences following State Non-Compliance with Provisional Measures in the Inter-American and European Human Rights Systems / C. Burbano-Herrera, Y. Haeck // Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. —
2010. — Vol. 28. — No. 3. — P. 332–360.
249. Burbano-Herrera, С. A critical analysis of the work of the European commission and European court of human rights in relation with non-com­pliance of interim measures: period 1957–2011 / С. Burbano-Herrera // Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi. — 2012. — Vol. 7. — № 2. — P. 1–56.
250. Cançado Trindade, A. The Developing Case Law of the Inter-Amer- ican Court of Human Rights / A. Cançado Trindade // Human Rights Law Review. — 2003. — Vol. 3. — No. 1. — P. 1–25.
251. Cançado Trindade, A. The Evolution of Provisional Measures Under the Case-Law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (1987–2002) / A. Cançado Trindade // Human Rights Law Journal. — 2003. — Vol. 24. — Nos. 5–8. — P. 162–168.
252. Caron, D. Interim Measures of Protection: Theory and Practice in Light of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal / D. Caron // Heidelberg Journal of International Law. — 1986. — Vol. 46. — P. 465–518.
253. Carter, L. Compliance with ICJ Provisional Measure and the Meaning of Review and Reconsideration Under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. V. U.S.) / L. Carter // Michigan Journal of International Law. — 2003. — Vol. 25. — No. 1. — P. 117–134.
254. Cerna, C. Provisional Measures: How International Human Rights Law is Changing International Law (Inspired by Gambia v. Myanmar) / C. Cerna // Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law. —
2021. — Vol. 11. — No. 1. — P. 34–59.
181
Библиография
255. Chachko, E. Foreign Affairs in Court: Lessons from CJEU: Tar­geted Sanctions Jurisprudence / E. Chachko // Yale Journal of International Law. — 2019. — Vol. 44. — No. 1. — P. 1–51.
256. Cheng, B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals / B. Cheng. — Cambridge University Press, 2006. — 544 p.
257. Cogan, J.K. Competition and Control in International Adjudication / J.K. Cogan // Virginia Journal of International Law. — 2008. — Vol. 48. — No. 2. — P. 411–449.
258. Cremades, B. The Principle of Confidentiality in Arbitration: A Neces- sary Crisis / B. Cremades, R. Cortés // Journal of Arbitration Studies. —
2013. — Vol. 23. — No. 3. — P. 25–38.
259. Daly, T. The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Mapping Resistance against a Young Court / T. Daly, M. Wiebusch // International Journal of Law in Context. — 2018. — Vol. 14. — No. 2. — P. 294–313.
260. de Burka, G. The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order / G. de Burka // Harvard International Law Review. — 2010. — Vol. 51. — No. 1. — P. 1–52.
261. Dupuy, P.-M. The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice / P.-M. Du­puy // International Law and Politics. — 1999. — Vol. 31. — P. 791–897.
262. Dupuy, P.-M. The Challenge of “Proliferation”: An Anatomy of the Debate / P.-M. Dupuy, J.E. Viñuales // The Oxford Handbook of In­ternational Adjudication / C. Romano, K.J. Alter, Y. Shany (eds.), 2013. — P. 135–155.
263. Editorial Comment. The First Case Before the Central American Court of Justice // The American Journal of International Law. — 1908. — Vol. 2. — No. 4. — P. 835–841.
264. Essoff, P. Finland v. Denmark: A Call to Clarify the International Court of Justice’s Standards for Provisional Measures / P. Essoff // Fordham International Law Journal. — 1991. — Vol. 15. — No. 3. — P. 839–878.
265. Frowein, J. Provisional Measures by the International Court of jus­tice — The LaGrand Case / J. Frowein // ZaöRV. — 2002. — Vol. 62. — Nos. 1–2. — P. 55–60.
266. Garry, H. When Procedure Involves Matters of Life and Death: Inter- im Measures and the European Convention on Human Rights / H. Garry // European Public Law. — 2001. — Vol. 7. — P. 399–432.
267. Gazzini, T. Provisional Measures in ICSID Arbitration: from ‘Won- derland’s Jurisprudence’ to Informal Modification of Treaties / T. Gazzini, R. Kolb // Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. — 2017. — Vol. 16. — No. 1. — P. 159–184.
182
Библиография
268. Ghandhi, S. The Human Rights Committee and Interim Measures of Re- lief / S. Ghandhi // Canterbury Law Review. — 2007. — Vol. 13. — P. 203–226.
269. Gillich, I. Limits and potentials of precautionary measures as a rem- edy for violations of international human rights — The case of the Inter­American Human Rights System / I. Gillich // University of Western Aus­tralia Law Review. — 2014. — Vol. 38. — No. 1. — P. 167–182.
270. Ginsburg, T. Political Constraints on International Courts / T. Gins- burg // The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication / C. Romano, K.J. Alter, Y. Shany (eds.). — P. 483–502.
271. González, F. Urgent Measures in the Inter-American System of Hu- man Rights / F. González // International Journal on Human Rights. —
2010. — Vol. 7. — No. 13. — P. 51–72.
272. Grzeszczak, R. Provisional Measures Against EU Member States in the light of the Białowieża Forest case / R. Grzeszczak, M. Muchel // Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations. — 2018. — Vol. 2. — No. 1. — P. 21–35.
273. Harrington, J. Punting Terrorists, Assassins and Other undesirables: Canada, the Human Rights Сcommittee and Requests for Interim Measures of Protection / J. Harrington // McGill Law Journal. — 2003. — Vol. 48. — Issue 1. — P. 55–87.
274. Higgins, R. Interim Measures for the Protection of Human Rights / R. Higgins // Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. — 1997. — Vol. 36. — Nos. 1–2. — P. 91–108.
275. Juma, D. Lost (or Found) in Transition? The Anatomy of the New African Court of Justice and Human Rights / D. Juma // Max Planck Year­book of United Nations Law. — 2009. — Vol. 13. — P. 267–306.
276. Juma, D. Provisional Measures under the African Human Rights System: The African Court’s Order Against Libya / D. Juma // Wisconsin International Law Journal. — 2012. — Vol. 30. — No. 2. — P. 344–373.
277. Kammerhofer, J. The Binding Nature of Provisional Measures of the International Court of Justice: The “Settlement” of the Issue in the LaGrand Case / J. Kammerhofer // Leiden Journal of International Law. — 2003. — Vol. 16. — No. 1. — P. 67–83.
278. Keller, H. Interim Relief Compared: Use of Interim Measures by the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights / H. Keller, C. Marti // Heidelberg Journal of International Law. — 2013. — Vol. 73. — No. 3. — P. 325–372.
279. Kolb, R. Note on the New International Case-Law Concerning the Binding Character of Provisional Measures / R. Kolb // Nordic Journal of International Law. — 2005. — Vol. 74. — P. 117–129.
183
Библиография
280. Koskenniemi, M. Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties / M. Koskenniemi, P. Leino // Leiden Journal of International Law. — 2002. — Vol. 15. — Issue 3. — P. 553–579.
281. Lalive, P. The First World Bank Arbitration (Holiday Inns v. Moroc- co) — Some Legal Problems / P. Lalive // British Yearbook of International Law. — 1980. — Vol. 51. — P. 123–161.
282. Lando, M. Establishing the existence of a ‘dispute’ under UNCLOS at the provisional measures stage: the Enrica Lexie case / M. Lando // Ques­tions of International Law. — 2015. — Vol. 22. — P. 3–24.
283. Lando, М. Plausibility in the Provisional Measures Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice / M. Lando // Leiden Journal of Inter­national Law. — 2018. — Vol. 31. — No. 3. — P. 641–668.
284. Lenaerts, K. EU Procedural Law / K. Lenaerts, I. Maselis, K. Gut­man. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. — 990 p.
285. Madsen, M.R. The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declara­tion and Backlash / M.R. Madsen // Law and Contemporary Problems. —
2016. — Vol. 79. — P. 141–178.
286. Marotti, L. “Game of Give and Take”: The ITLOS, the ICJ and Provisional Measures / L. Marotti // Provisional Measures Issued by In­ternational Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo and G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2021. — P. 131–146.
287. McLachlan, C. The Continuing Controversy over Provisional Mea- sures in International Disputes / C. McLachlan // International Law FORUM du droit international. — 2005. — Vol. 7. — Issue 1. — P. 5–15.
288. Mensah, T. Provisional Measures in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) / T. Mensah // Heidelberg Journal of International Law. — 2002. — Vol. 62. — P. 43–54.
289. Mensah, T. The Dispute Settlement Regime of the 1982 United Na- tions Convention on the Law of the Sea / T. Mensah // Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. — 1998. — Vol. 2. — P. 307–323.
290. Miles, C.A. Provisional Measures and the ‘New’ Plausibility in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice / C.A. Miles // British Yearbook of International Law. — 2018. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ bybil/bry011 (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
291. Miles, C.A. Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tri- bunals / C.A. Miles. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. — 592 p.
292. Miles, C.A. The Origins of the Law of Provisional Measures be­fore International Courts and Tribunals / C.A. Miles // ZaöRV. — 2013. — Vol. 73. — P. 615–672.
184
Библиография
293. Mitchell, A. The Inherent Jurisdiction of WTO Tribunals: The Select Application of Public International Law Required by the Judicial Function / A. Mitchell, D. Heaton // Michigan Journal of International Law. — 2010. — Vol. 31. — P. 559–619.
294. Naldi, G.J. Interim Measures in the UN Human Rights Commit­tee / G.J. Naldi // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. — 2004. — Vol. 53. — No. 2. — P. 445–454.
295. Noyes, J. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea / J. Noyes // Cornell International Law Journal. — 1999. — Vol. 32. — No. 1. — P. 109–182.
296. Oda, S. Provisional Measures: The Practice of the International Court of Justice / S. Oda // Fifty Years of The International Court of Justice / V. Lowe, M. Fitzmaurice (eds.). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1996. — P. 541–556.
297. Oellers-Frahm, K. Article 41 / K. Oellers-Frahm // The Interna­tional Court of Justice: A Commentary / A. Zimmermann, K. Oellers­Frahm, C. Tomuschat (eds.). — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. — P. 1062–1069.
298. Oellers-Frahm, K. Expanding the Competence to Issue Provisional Measures — Strengthening the International Judicial Function / K. Oellers­Frahm // German Law Journal. — 2011. — Vol. 12. — No. 5. — P. 1279–1294.
299. Oellers-Frahm, K. Use and Abuse of Interim Protection Before Inter- national Courts and Tribunals / K. Oellers-Frahm // Coexistence, coopera­tion and solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum / H. Hestermeyer et al. (eds.). — Leiden, The Netherlands; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,
2012. — P. 1685–1703.
300. Orakhelashvili, A. Natural Law and Customary Law / A. Orakhel­ashvili // Heidelberg Journal of International Law. — 2008. — Vol. 68. — P. 69–110.
301. Orzan, M.F. The Procedural Features of Interim Relief Before the Court of Justice of the European Union / M.F. Orzan // Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo and G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2021. — P. 199–213.
302. Palombino, F.M. Conclusion / F.M. Palombino // Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo and G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2021. — P. 365–369.
303. Papanicolopulu, I. Considerations of humanity in the Enrica Lexie Case / I. Papanicolopulu // Questions of International Law. — 2015. — Vol. 22. — P. 25–37.
185
Библиография
304. Paparinskis, M. Inherent Powers of ICSID Tribunals: Broad and Rightly So / M. Paparinskis // Investment Treaty Arbitration and Interna­tional Law. — 2011. — Vol. 5. — P. 1–31.
305. Pascale, G. Provisional Measures Under the African Human Rights System / G. Pascale // Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo and G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2021. — P. 253–275.
306. Pasqualucci, J. Interim Measures in International Human Rights: Evolution and Harmonization / J. Pasqualucci // Vanderbilt Journal of Trans­national Law. — 2005. — Vol. 38. — No. 1. — P. 1–49.
307. Pauciulo, D. Provisional Measures in ICSID Arbitration Proceed­ings: Between the Current Legal Framework and the Proposed Reform / D. Pauciulo // Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo, G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague,
2021. — P. 319–364.
308. Pech, L. Poland’s Rule of Law Breakdown: A Five‑Year Assessment of EU’s (In)Action / L. Pech, P. Wachowiec, D. Mazur // Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. — 2021. — Vol. 13. — P. 1–43.
309. Polymenopoulou, E. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: African Commission On Human and Peoples’ Rights v. Great Socialist People’s Libyan, Arab Jamahiriya, Order for Provisional Measures, 25 March 2011 / E. Polymenopoulou // International and Comparative Law Quar­terly. — 2012. — Vol. 61. — No. 3. — P. 767–775.
310. Rieter, E. Autonomy of Provisional Measures / E. Rieter // Provi­sional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Pal­ombino, R. Virzo and G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press,
2021. — P. 55–76.
311. Romano, C. The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle / C. Romano // New York University Journal of Inter­national Law and Policy. — 1998. — Vol. 31. — P. 709–751.
312. Romano, C. The Southern Bluefin Tuna Dispute: Hints of a World to Come… Like It or Not / C. Romano // Ocean Development & International Law. — 2001. — Vol. 32. — Issue 4. — P. 313–348.
313. Ronzitti, N. Sanctions as Instruments of Coercive Diplomacy: An In- ternational Law Perspective / N. Ronzitti // Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law / N. Ronzitti (ed.). — Brill Nijhoff, 2016. — P. 1–32.
314. Rosenne, S. Provisional Measures in International Law: The Interna- tional Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (International Courts and Tribunals Series) / S. Rosenne. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. — 262 p.
186
Библиография
315. Rosenne, S. The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920– 2005: Volume III / S. Rosenne. — 4th ed. — Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.
316. Rylatt, J. Provisional Measures and the Authority of the International Court of Justice: Sovereignty vs. Efficiency / J. Rylatt // Leeds Journal of Law & Criminology. — 2013. — Vol. 1. — No. 1. — P. 45–68.
317. Saccucci, A. Interim Measures at the European Court of Human Rights: Current Practice and Future Challenges / A. Saccucci // Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo, G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague, 2021. — P. 215–252.
318. Sałkiewicz-Munnerlyn, E. Jurisprudence of the PCIJ and of the ICJ on Interim Measures of Protection / E. Sałkiewicz-Munnerlyn. — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022. — 155 p.
319. Shelton, D. Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts / D. Shelton // Chicago Journal of International Law. — 2009. — Vol. 9. — No. 2. — P. 557–571.
320. Sparks, T. The Humanisation of Provisional Measures? —Plausibility and the Interim Protection of Rights Before the ICJ / T. Sparks, M. Somos // Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo and G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2021. — P. 77–105.
321. Stehlík, V. Interim measures before national courts in the context of EU and Czech law / V. Stehlík // International and Comparative Law Review. — 2012. — Vol. 12. — No. 2. — P. 7–42.
322. Tams, C.J. The Contentious Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court / C.J. Tams // The Legacy of The Permanent Court of International Justice / M. Fitzmaurice, C.J. Tams (eds.). — Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013. — P. 9–39.
323. Tanaka, Y. A New Phase of the Temple of Preah Vihear Dispute before the International Court of Justice: Reflections on the Indication of Provisional Measures of 18 July 2011 / Y. Tanaka // Chinese Journal of International Law. — 2012. — Vol. 11. — No. 1. — P. 191–226.
324. Tanaka, Y. Reflections on Provisional Measures in Inter-state Arbitration / Y. Tanaka // Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals / F.M. Palombino, R. Virzo and G. Zarra (eds.). — The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2021. — P. 171–196.
325. Treves, T. Fragmentation of International Law: The Judicial Perspec- tive / T. Treves // Agenda Internacional. — 2009. — Vol. 16. — No. 27. — P. 213–253.
326. Tzanakopoulos, A. Provisional Measures Indicated by International Courts: Emergence of a General Principle of International Law / A. Tzana-
187
Библиография
kopoulos // Revue Hellenique de Droit International. — 2004. — Vol. 57. — P. 53–84.
327. Wolfrum, R. Provisional Measures of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea / R. Wolfrum // Indian Journal of International Law. —
1997. — Vol. 37. — No. 3. — P. 420–434.
V. Диссертации и авторефераты диссертаций
328. Абгарян, Д.Р. Практика международного трибунала по мор- скому праву: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.10 / Джульетта Рубеновна Абгарян. — М., 2014. — 153 c.
329. Коваленко, С.Г. Компетенция Международного трибунала по морскому праву: автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.10 / Ко­валенко Степан Георгиевич. — М., 2008. — 27 с.
330. Патрин, Д.А. Международное судебное разбирательство: Ис­тория, понятие, функции: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.10 / Патрин Денис Александрович. — М., 2005. — 235 с.
331. Хубиева, М.Н. Практика международных судов и арбитражей, предусмотренных Конвенцией ООН по морскому праву: автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.10 / Хубиева Маргарита Расуловна. — М., 2012. — 30 с.
VI. Интернет-ресурсы
332. 2012 U.S. Model Bilateral Investment Treaty. — URL: https://ustr. gov/sites/default/files/BIT%20text%20for%20ACIEP%20Meeting.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
333. ACtHPR Сases. Provisional measures. — URL: https://www.african­court.org/cpmt/provisional-measures (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
334. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights adopts new rules of the Court // Press release of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. — 28 September 2020. — URL: https://www.african-court.org/ wpafc/african-court-on-human-and-peoples-rights-adopts-new-rules-of­court/ (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
335. Armenia v. Azerbaijan and alleged captives: notification to the Committee of Ministers of interim measures indicated. — URL: http:// hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-6965126-9374600 (дата обращения:
28.11.2022).
188
Библиография
336. Benin and Ivory Coast withdraw declarations from Africa rights court. — URL: https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/news/rest-of-africa/be­nin-and-ivory-coast-withdraw-declarations-from-africa-rights-court-1441804 (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
337. Canada 2014 Model FIPA (English). — URL: https://www. italaw.com/sites/default/files/files/italaw8236.pdf (дата обращения:
28.11.2022).
338. Chenwi L. Successes of African Human Rights Court undermined by resistance from states. — URL: https://theconversation.com/successes-of­african-human-rights-court-undermined-by-resistance-from-states-166454 (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
339. Contentious cases organized by incidental proceedings. Provisional measures. — URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/cases-by-phase/provisional­measures (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
340. Court of Justice of the European Union. Annual Report 2020. Judi­cial Activity. — URL: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/ pdf/2021-04/ra_jud_2020_en.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
341. De Silva N., Plagis M. A Court in Crisis: African States’ Increasing Resistance to Africa’s Human Rights Court. — URL: http://opiniojuris. org/2020/05/19/a-court-in-crisis-african-states-increasing-resistance-to­africas-human-rights-court/ (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
342. Factsheet — Interim measures, April 2021. — URL: https://www. echr.coe.int/documents/fs_interim_measures_eng.pdf (дата обращения:
28.11.2022).
343. Goldberg D., Kryvoi Y., Philippov I. Empirical Study: Provisional Measures in Investor — State Arbitration. — London, 2019. — URL: https:// ssrn.com/abstract=3495386 (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
344. ICSID, Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules — Working Paper, 2 August 2018, Schedule 9 — Addressing Time and Costs in ICSID Arbitration. — URL: https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/publica­tions/WP1_Amendments_Vol_3_WP-updated-9.17.18.pdf (дата обращения:
28.11.2022).
345. Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Annual Report 2020. VI. Provisional measures. P. 89–100. — URL: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/ informe2020/ingles.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
346. Interim Report of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights Notifying the Executive Council of Non-Compliance by a State, in accor­dance with Article 31 of the Protocol. — URL: http://www.african-court.org/ en/images/Other%20Reports/AFCHPR_Interim_Report__Non_compli­ance_by_a_State__-_Libya.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
189
Библиография
347. International Court of Justice Yearbook 2018–2019. — URL: https:// www.icj-cij.org/public/files/publications/yearbook-2018-2019.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
348. Koagne Zouapet A. ‘Victim of its commitment … You, passerby, a tear to the proclaimed virtue’: Should the epitaph of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights be prepared? — URL: https://www.ejiltalk.org/ victim-of-its-commitment-you-passerby-a-tear-to-the-proclaimed-virtue­should-the-epitaph-of-the-african-court-on-human-and-peoples-rights-be­prepared/ (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
349. List of countries which have signed, ratified/acceded to the Pro­tocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights. — URL: https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/36396-sl-PROTOCOL%20 ON%20THE%20STAT UTE%20OF%20THE%2 0 A FRICA N%20 COURT%20OF%20JUSTICE%20AND%20HUMAN%20RIGHTS.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
350. Preventing harm to refugees and migrants in extradition and expul­sion cases: Rule 39 indications by the European Court of Human Rights. — URL: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en. asp?fileid=12576&lang=en (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
351. Rule 39 requests granted and refused in 2018, 2019 and 2020 by respondent State. — URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Stats_ art_39_01_ENG.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
352. Summary Proceedings of the Legal Committee Meeting, 8 December 1964 // History of the ICSID Convention. Vol. II. — URL: https://icsid. worldbank.org/sites/default/files/publications/History%20of%20the%20 ICSID%20Convention/History%20of%20ICSID%20Convention%20-%20 VOLUME%20II-2.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
353. The Court grants an interim measure in the case of Armenia v. Azer­baijan. — URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-6809725-9108584 (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
354. The Court’s Priority Policy. — URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/ documents/priority_policy_eng.pdf (дата обращения: 28.11.2022).
355. The republic of Guinea Bissau becomes the eighth country to deposit a Declaration under article 34(6) of the Protocol establishing the Court // Press release of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. 3 No­vember 2021. — URL: https://www.african-court.org/wpafc/the-republic­of-guinea-bissau-becomes-the-eighth-country-to-deposit-a-declaration­under-article-346-of-the-protocol-establishing-the-court/ (дата обраще­ния: 28.11.2022).
190
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]
Помощь Обратная связь Вопросы и предложения Пользовательское соглашение Политика конфиденциальности