«Делать вещи нужные и веселые…». Авангардные установки в теории литературы и критике ОПОЯЗа
.pdfPomorska 1983 — Pomorska K. The legacy of the Opojaz
//Russian literature.—1983.— V. 14. — № 3.
Prague school 1988 — The Prague school and its legacy in linguistics, literature, semiotics, folklore and the arts / Ed. by Y. Tobin. — Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 1988.— 317 p.
Readings in Russian Poetics 1971 — Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views / Eds. L. Matejka and K. Pomorska. — Cambridge (Mass.), 1971. — 306 p.
Rosengrant 1980 — Rosengrant S. The theoretical criticism of Jurij Tynjanov // Comparative literature.—Engene (Oregon), 1980. — V. 32. — № 4. —
p. 335–389.
Russian formalism 1973 — Russian formalism: A collection
of articles and texts in translation / Ed. by
St. Bann and J. E. Bowlt. — Edinburgh, 1973. — 178 p.
Russian formalism 1985 — Russian formalism: A retrospective glance / In Honor of Victor Erlich / Eds. R. L. Jackson, S. Rudy.— New Haven.— 1985.— 304 p.
Russo 1988 — Russo J. P. Tranquillised poem: The crisis of the new criticism in the 1950 / Texas studies in literature and language.—Austin, 1988.— Vol. 30. — N° 2. — p. 198–299 // РЖ «Общественные науки за рубежом: Литературо ведение».—1990.—№3.— с. 34–37.
Sherwood 1973 — Sherwood R. Viktor Shklowsky and the development of early formalists theory on prose literature // Russian formalism: A collection of articles and texts in
translation / Ed by St. Bann and J. E. Bowlt. — Edinburgh, 1973.— p. 26–40.
Stacy 1977 — Stacy R. H. Defamiliarization in language and literature.— NY.,
1977.— 193 p.
Steiner 1984 — Steiner P. Russian formalism: A metapoetics. — London, 1984. — 276 p.
Striedter 1989 — Striedter J. Literare structure, evolution and value: Russian formalism and Czech structuralism reconsidered.— Cambridge (Mass.); L., 1989. — 317 p.
Thompson 1971 — Thompson E. M. Russian formalism and AngloAmerican new criticism:
A comparative study. — Mouton, 1971. — 160 p.
171
Todorov 1973 — Todorov Tz.
Some approaches to Russian formalism // Russian formalism: A collection
of articles and texts in translation / Ed. by St. Bann and J. E. Bowlt. — Edinburgh, 1973.— p. 6–19.
Twentieth-century Russian literary criticism 1975 — Twentieth- century Russian literary criticism.— New Haven, 1975.— 317 p.
Tynjanov-RÉS 1983 — Ju. N. Tynjanov: Special issue // Revue des Études Slaves.— Paris, 1983.— V. 55. — № 3.
Vodička 1977 — Vodička F. Response to verbal art // Semiotics of art: Prague school contributions / Eds. L. Matejka, I. Titunik. — Cambridge, 1977. — p. 197–208.
Wellek 1969 — Wellek R. The literary theory and aesthetics of the Prague school. — Ann Arbor, 1969.— 38 p.
Wellek 1976 — Wellek R. Russian formalism // Russian modernism culture and the avant-garde, 1900–1930.— Ithaca; London, 1976. — p. 31–48.
Weststeijn 1988 — Weststeijn W. G. Лирический субъект в поэзии русского авангарда // Russian literature.— 1988.— N° 2.— p. 235–257.
172 ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Summary
The book of Maria Umnova To do indispensable and joyful things: Literary theory and criticism of OPOYAZ focuses on the relationship between the theory and the practice of the Russian formalist school, especially its three most prominent figures, Viktor Shklovsky, Juri Tynyanov, and Boris Eichenbaum, with the most radical trends in the literary and aesthetic avant-garde in the first quarter of the XX century.
This interaction shaped the basic theoretical under pinnings of the formal method: (i) the relativity of the aesthetic value (which can only exist within a particular aesthetic system); (ii) understanding of literary works as aesthetic objects; (iii) the evaluation of а work according to its ability to advance the literary evolution.
Maria Umnova places the literary criticism by the members of OPOYAZ in the context of the confrontation between the two antagonistic “cultures”: the ‘hot’ culture that rejects canons and extols new artistic phenomena to high heaven, and the ‘cold’ culture that seeks to preserve the legacy inherited from the past.
The avant-garde nature of Russian formalism predetermined its death as a social phenomenon. The ‘hot’ culture of the 10s–20s was replaced by the ‘cold’ culture and the society of the 30s that focused not on creativity, but on reproducing stereotypes and cultural clichés; thus, a cultural polyphony gave way to the ‘authoritative’ style.
Научная литература
Мария Викторовна Умнова «Делать вещи нужные и веселые…» / Авангардные
установки в теории литературы и критике ОПОЯЗа
ISBN 978-5-89826-414-7
Над книгой работали:
Андрей Уткин, Ирина Степачева-Бохенек — выпуск Александр Горшков, Анастасия Яруллина — обложка, макет Наталья Еремина —верстка
Для набора использована гарнитура Metrofont (MTF), разработанная шрифтовым дизайнером Артемом Уткиным (www.fenrby.com)
Подписано в печать 06.08.2013 Формат издания 84×108 ¼ Гарнитура Metrofont (MTF) Тираж 500 экз.
Издательство «Прогресс-Традиция» 119048, Москва, ул. Усачева, д. 29 корп. 9 Тел.: 8-499-245-49-03
Отпечатано с готового оригинал-макета в типографии «Момент»
141406, Московская область, г. Химки, ул. Библиотечная, д.11