![](/user_photo/645_YyhhR.jpg)
Patterson, Bailey - Solid State Physics Introduction to theory
.pdf12Current Topics in Solid Condensed–Matter Physics
This chapter is concerned with some of the newer areas of solid condensed-matter physics and so contains a variety of topics in nanophysics, surfaces, interfaces, amorphous materials, and soft condensed matter.
There was a time when the living room radio stood on the floor and people gathered around in the evening and “watched” the radio. Radios have become smaller and smaller and thus, increasingly cheaper. Eventually, of course, there will be a limit in smallness of size to electronic devices. Fundamental physics places constraints on how small the device can be and still operate in a “conventional way”. Recently people have realized that a limit for one kind of device is an opportunity for another. This leads to the topic of new ways of using materials, particularly semiconductors, for new devices.
Of course, the subject of electronic technology, particularly semiconductor technology, is too vast to consider here. One main concern is the fact that quantum mechanics places basic limits on the size of devices. This arises because quantum mechanics associates a wavelength with the electrons that carry current and electrical signals. Quantum effects become important when electron wavelength becomes comparable to component size. In particular, the phenomenon of tunneling, which is often assumed to be of no importance for most ordinary microelectronic devices becomes important in this limit. We will discuss some of the basic physics needed to understand these devices, in which tunneling and related phenomena are important. Here we get into the area of bandgap engineering to attain structures that have desired properties not attainable with homostructures. Generally, these structures are nanostructures. A nanostructure is a condensed-matter structure having at least one minimum dimension between about 1 nm to 10 nm.
We will start by discussing surfaces and then consider how to form nanostructures on surfaces by molecular beam epitaxy. Nanostructures may be two dimensional (quantum wells), one dimensional (quantum wires), or “zero” dimensional (quantum dots). We will discuss all of these and also talk about heterostructures, superlattices, quantum conductance, Coulomb blockade, and single-electron devices.
Another reduced-dimensionality effect is the quantum Hall effect, which arises when electrons in a magnetic field are confined two dimensionally. As we will see, the ideas and phenomena involved are quite novel.
Carbon, carbon nanotubes, and fullerene nanotechnology may lead to entirely new kinds of devices and they are also included in this chapter, as the nanotubes are certainly nanostructures.
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih622x1.jpg)
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih623x1.jpg)
12.2 Some Surface Characterization Techniques (MET, MS, EE) 611
theoretical techniques, including those using the pseudopotential, which are available. See Chen and Ho [12.12].
Since surfaces are so important for solid-state properties we briefly review techniques for their characterization in the next section.
12.2Some Surface Characterization Techniques (MET, MS, EE)
AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy–This instrument detects images of surfaces on an atomic scale by sensing atomic forces between the sample and a cantilevered tip (in one kind of mode, there are various modes of operation). Unlike STMs (see below), this instrument can be used for nonconductors as well as conductors.
AES: Auger Electron Spectroscopy–uses an alternative (to X-ray emission) decay scheme for an excited core hole. The core hole is often produced by the impact of energetic electrons. An electron from a higher level makes a transition to fill the hole, and another bound electron escapes with the left-over energy. The Auger process leaves two final-state holes. The energy of the escaping electron is related to the characteristic energies of the atom from which it came, and therefore chemical analysis is possible.
EDX: Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy–electrons are incident at a grazing angle and the energy of the grazing X-rays that are produced, are detected and analyzed. This technique has sensitivities comparable to Auger electron spectroscopy.
Ellipsometry–study of the reflection of plane-polarized light from the surface of materials to determine the properties of these materials by measuring the ellipticity of the reflected light.
EELS: Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy–electrons scattered from surface atoms may lose amounts of energy dependent on surface excitations. This can be used to examine surface vibrational modes. It is also used to detect surface plasmons.
EXAFS: Extended X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy–photoelectrons caused to be emitted by X-rays are backscattered from surrounding atoms. They interfere with the emitted photoelectrons and give information about the geometry of the atoms that surround the original absorbing atom. When this technique is surface specific, as for detecting Auger electrons, it is called SEXAFS.
FIM: Field Ion Microscopy–this can be used to detect individual atoms. Ions of the surrounding imaging gas are produced by field ionization at a tip and are detected on a fluorescent screen placed at a distance, to which ions are repelled.
LEED: Low-Energy Electron Diffraction–due to their charge, electrons do not penetrate deeply into a surface. LEED is the coherent reflection or diffraction of
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih624x1.jpg)
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih625x1.jpg)
12.3 Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MET, MS) 613
There are of course many other characterization techniques that we could discuss. There are many kinds of scanning probe microscopes, for example. There are many kinds of characterization techniques that are not primarily related to surface properties. Some ideas have already been discussed. Elastic and inelastic X-ray and neutron scattering come immediately to mind. Electrical conductivity and other electrical measurements can often yield much information, as can the many kinds of magnetic resonance techniques. Optical techniques can yield important information (see, e.g., Perkowitz [12.49], as well as Chap. 10 on optical properties in this book). Raman scattering spectroscopy is often important in the infrared. Spectroscopic data involves information about intensity versus frequency. In Raman scattering, the incident photon is inelastically scattered by phonons. Commercial instruments are available, as they are for FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy), which use a Michelson interferometer to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and get the Fourier transform of the intensity versus frequency. A FFT (fast Fourier transform) algorithm is then used to get the intensity versus frequency in real time. Perkowitz also mentions photoluminescence spectroscopy, where in general after photon excitation an electron returns to its initial state. Commercial instruments are also available. This technique gives fingerprints of excited states. Considerable additional information about characterization can be found in Bullis et al [12.5]. For a general treatment see Prutton [12.52] and Marder (preface ref. 6, pp73-82).
12.3 Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MET, MS)
Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) was developed in the 1970s and is by now a common technology for use in making low-dimensional solid-state structure. MBE is an ultrathin film vacuum technique in which several atomic and/or molecular beams collide with and stick to the substrate. Epitaxy means that at the interface of two materials, there is a common crystal orientation and registry of atoms. The substrates are heated to temperature T and mounted suitably. Each effusion cell, from which the molecular beams originate, are held at appropriate temperatures to maintain a suitable flux. The effusion cells also have shutters so that the growth of layers due to the molecular beams can be controlled (see Fig. 12.1). MBE produces high-purity layers in ultrahigh vacuum. Abrupt transitions on an atomic scale can be grown at a rate of a few (tens of) nanometers per second. See, e.g., Joyce [12.31]. Other techniques for producing layered structures include chemical vapor deposition and electrochemical deposition.
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih626x1.jpg)
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih627x1.jpg)
12.5 Quantum Structures and Single-Electron Devices (EE) 615
devices (e.g. by depositing small-bandgap – large-bandgap – small-bandgap – large
– small, etc. See applications of superlattices in Sect. 12.6.1). A quantum well can show increased tunneling currents due to resonance at allowed energy levels in the well. The current versus voltage can even show a decrease with voltage for certain values of voltage. See Fig. 12.11. Diodes and transistors have been constructed with these devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EC |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EC |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gap |
|
Gap |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EV |
EV |
Gap |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal (type I) |
|
Broken (type II) |
Fig. 12.2. Normal and broken heterostructures
12.5Quantum Structures and Single-Electron Devices (EE)
Dimension is an important aspect of small electronic devices. Dimensionality can be controlled by sandwiching. If the center of the sandwich is bordered by planar materials for which the electronic states are higher (wider bandgaps), then threedimensional motion can be reduced to two, producing quantum wells. Similarly one can make linear one-dimensional “quantum wires” and nearly zerodimensional or “quantum dot” materials. That is, a quantum wire is made by laying down a line of narrow-gap semiconductors surrounded by a wide-gap one with the carriers confined in two dimensions, while a quantum dot involves only a small volume of narrow-gap material surrounded by wide-gap material and the carriers are confined in all three dimensions. With the quantum-dot structure, one may confine or exchange one electron at a time and develop single-electron transistors that would be fast, low power, and have essentially error-free signals. These three types of quantum structures are summarized in Table 12.1.
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih628x1.jpg)
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih629x1.jpg)
12.5 Quantum Structures and Single-Electron Devices (EE) 617
Fig. 12.3. Model of a single-electron transistor
Note that while Q0 can be any value, the actual physical situation will be determined by the integer number of electrons on the artificial atom (metal particle) that makes U the smallest. This will only be at a mathematical minimum if Vg is an integral multiple of e/C.
For −1/2 < η < 1/2, and Vg = (N + η)e/C, the minimum energy is obtained for N electrons on the metal particle. The Coulomb blockade arises because of the energy required to transfer an electron to (or from) the metal particle (you can’t transfer less than an electron). We can easily calculate this as follows. Let us consider η between zero and one half. Combining (12.2) and (12.4),
|
1 |
|
Q2 |
|
|
U = |
|
Q(N +η)e + |
2 |
. |
(12.5) |
|
|||||
|
C |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let the initial charge on the particle be Qi = −Ne and the final charge be Qf = −(N ± 1)e. Then for the energy difference,
|
|
|
|
|
|
U ± =U ±f |
−Ui , |
|
|
|
|
||
we find |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
e2 |
1 |
|
|
− |
|
e2 |
1 |
|
||
U |
|
= |
|
|
|
−η , |
U |
|
= |
C |
|
|
+η . |
|
C |
2 |
|
2 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We see that for η < 1/2 there is an energy gap for tunneling: the Coulomb blockade. For η = 1/2 the energies for the metal particle having N and N + 1 electrons are the same and the gap disappears. Since the source and the drain have approximately the same Fermi energy, one can understand this result from Fig. 12.4. Note ∆U + is the energy to add an electron and ∆U − is the energy to take away an electron (or to add a hole). Thus the gap in the allowed states of the particle is e2/C. Just above η = 1/2, the number of electrons on the artificial atoms increases by 1 (to N + 1) and the process repeats as Vg is increased. It is indeed reminiscent of a dripping faucet.
![](/html/645/163/html_loQAxvzvRF.xgHO/htmlconvd-XMs5ih630x1.jpg)