Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6035_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •About the Editor
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Abbreviations
- •Preface
- •1. Natural Products as Drug Candidates
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 An array of natural products
- •1.2.1 Plant-derived natural products
- •1.2.2 Microbial natural products
- •1.3 Importance of analytical techniques
- •1.3.1 A glance at extraction techniques
- •1.3.2 Microbial culturing techniques
- •1.3.3 Outlook and perspectives in nanoparticles
- •1.4 Natural products as a guide in drug design and synthesis
- •1.5 Natural products as promising drug candidates
- •1.5.1 Antiviral drug candidates
- •1.5.2 Antiparasitic drug candidates
- •1.5.3 Neuroprotective agents
- •1.6 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •2. Traditional Knowledge for Drug Discovery
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Databases on indian remedial flora, indigenous medicines, and phytochemicals
- •2.2.1 Cultural preservation
- •2.2.2 Sustainable practices
- •2.2.3 Biodiversity conservation
- •2.2.4 Health and medicine
- •2.2.5 Climate change adaptation
- •2.2.6 Interconnectedness and wisdom
- •2.3 History of traditional knowledge
- •2.3.1 Indigenous healing practices
- •2.3.2 Aboriginal dreamtime
- •2.3.3 Traditional agriculture
- •2.3.4 Traditional crafts
- •2.3.5 Indigenous cosmologies
- •2.3.6 Traditional music and dance
- •2.3.7 Traditional navigation
- •2.4 Traditional medicine in plant formulations
- •2.4.1 Ayurveda
- •2.4.2 Traditional chinese medicine
- •2.4.3 Indigenous healing practices
- •2.5 Drug discovery
- •2.6 Aspects of developing plant-based drugs
- •2.6.1 Selection criteria for plants
- •2.6.2 Plant material authentication
- •2.6.3 Extraction methods
- •2.6.4 Isolation and structure elucidation of bioactive components
- •2.6.5 Standardization of plant formulations
- •2.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •3. Herbal Healing: Plant-Based Natural Products
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Classification of secondary metabolites
- •3.2.1 Phenolic compounds
- •3.2.2 Terpenes
- •3.2.3 Alkaloids
- •3.3 History of natural products
- •3.4 Drug discovery from natural products
- •3.5 Drugs derived from the plants
- •3.6 Conclusions
- •Keywords
- •References
- •4. Natural Products with Antimicrobial Properties
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Plants as antimicrobial agents
- •4.3 Marine sources as antimicrobial agents
- •4.4 Antimicrobial products derived from microorganisms
- •4.5 Conclusions and future trends
- •Keywords
- •References
- •5. Natural Products with Immunomodulatory Properties
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Aloe vera (l.) burm.f. (family: asphodelaceae)
- •5.2.2 Andrographis paniculata (burm. f.) wall.ex.nees. (family: acanthaceae)
- •5.2.3 Acorus calamus l. (family: araceae)
- •5.2.4 Allium sativum l. (family: alliaceae)
- •5.2.5 Azadirachta indica a. juss. (family: meliaceae)
- •5.2.6 Argyreia speciosa (l.f.) sweet (family: convolvulaceae)
- •5.2.7 Bidens pilosa l. (family: asteraceae)
- •5.2.8 Baliospermum montanum (willd.) müll.arg. (family: euphorbiaceae)
- •5.2.9 Boerhaavia diffusa l. (family: nyctaginaceae)
- •5.2.10 Boswellia serrata roxb. excolebr. (family: burseraceae)
- •5.2.11 Camellia sinensis (l.) kuntze (family: theaaceae)
- •5.2.12 Capparis zeylanica l. (family: capparidaceae)
- •5.2.13 Calendula officinalis l. (family: asteraceae)
- •5.2.14 Chelidonium majus l. (family: papaveraceae)
- •5.2.15 Carica papaya l. (family: caricaceae)
- •5.2.26 Glycyrrhiza glabra l. (family: leguminosae)
- •5.2.27 Hypericum perforatum l. (family: hypericaceae)
- •5.2.28 Hippophae rhamnoides l. (family: elaeagnaceae)
- •5.2.29 Hydrastis canadensis l. (family: ranunculaceae)
- •5.2.30 Jatropha curcas l. (family: euphorbiaceae)
- •5.2.31 Mangifera indica l. (family: anacardiaceae)
- •5.2.32 Mollugo verticillata l. (family: molluginaceae)
- •5.2.33 Matricaria chamomilla l. (family: asteraceae)
- •5.2.34 Momordica charantia l. (family: cucurbitaceae)
- •5.2.35 Morinda citrifolia l. (family: rubiaceae)
- •5.2.36 Nigella sativa l. (family: ranunculaceae)
- •5.2.37 Nelumbo nucifera gaertn. (family: nymphaeceae)
- •5.2.38 Nerium oleander l. (family: apocynaceae)
- •5.2.39 Ocimum tenuiflorum l. (family: labiatae)
- •5.2.40 Premna tomentosa willd. (family: verbanaceae)
- •5.2.41 Plantago sp. (plantago major l. and plantago asiatica l.) (family: plantaginaceae)
- •5.2.42 Psoralea corylifolia l. (family: fabaceae)
- •5.2.43 Prunella vulgaris l. (family: lamiaceae)
- •5.2.44 Punica granatum l. (family: punicaceae)
- •5.2.45 Rhinacanthus nasutus (l.) kurz (family: acanthaceae)
- •5.2.46 Salvia officinalis l. (family: lamiaceae)
- •5.2.47 Tamarindus indica l. (family: leguminosae)
- •5.2.48 Tinospora cordifolia (willd.) miers (family: menispermaceae)
- •5.2.16 Centella asiatica (l.) urb. (family: umbelliferae)
- •5.2.17 Cichorium intybus l. (family: asteraceae)
- •5.2.18 Cryptolepis dubia (burm.f.) m.r. almeida (family: apocynaceae)
- •5.2.19 Citrus aurantiifolia (christm.) swingle (family: rutaceae)
- •5.2.20 Curcuma longa l. (family: zingiberaceae)
- •5.2.21 Desmodium gangeticum (l.) dc. (family: fabaceae)
- •5.2.22 Eclipta prostrata (l.) (family: asteraceae)
- •5.2.23 Phyllanthus emblica l. (family: euphorbiaceae)
- •5.2.24 Evolvulus alsinoides (l.) (family: convolvulaceae)
- •5.2.25 Ficus benghalensis l. (family: moraceae)
- •5.2.49 Terminalia chebula retz. (family: combretaceae)
- •5.2.51 Urtica dioica l. (family: urticaceae)
- •5.2.52 Withania somnifera (l.) dunal (cultivated var.) (family: solanaceae)
- •5.3 Traditional importance of research to society and researchers
- •5.4 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •6. Natural Products with Anticancerous Properties
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Plant-derived anticancer compounds
- •6.2.1 Polyphenols
- •6.2.2 Flavanoids
- •6.2.3 Brassinosteroids
- •6.2.4 Vinca alkaloids
- •6.2.5 Taxanes
- •6.2.6 Campothecin derivatives
- •6.3 Microorganisms-based anticancer compounds
- •6.3.1 Primary metabolites
- •6.3.2 Secondary metabolites
- •6.4 Selected medicinal plants with anticancerous activities
- •6.4.1 Curcuma longa l.
- •6.4.2 Viscum album l.
- •6.4.3 Colchicum autumnale l.
- •6.4.4 Raphanus sativus l.
- •6.4.5 Tinospora cordifolia wild
- •6.4.6 Nigella sativa l.
- •6.5 Therapeutic enzymes
- •6.6 Future perspective
- •6.7 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •7. Natural Products with Antiviral Properties
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Source of natural products with antiviral activity
- •7.3 Main components of natural products
- •7.3.1 Flavonoids
- •7.3.2 Polyphenols
- •7.3.3 Polysaccharides
- •7.3.4 Terpenoids
- •7.4 Mechanisms of action of natural compounds in viral infections
- •7.4.1 Direct antiviral effect
- •7.4.2 Anti-inflammatory effect in viral infections
- •7.4.3 Effect on autophagy process
- •7.6 Conclusions
- •Keywords
- •References
- •8. Approaches to Develop Drugs from Natural Products
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Scenario of drug discovery
- •8.3 Efficient drug discovery engines
- •8.4 Drug discovery approaches using plants
- •8.4.1 Plant selection for screening purpose
- •8.4.2 Authentication of plants
- •8.4.3 Types of molecular markers
- •8.5.1 Parallel approach
- •8.5.2 Sequential approach
- •8.6 Structure elucidation of isolated compounds
- •8.7 Biological screening of extracts/fraction/isolates
- •8.7.1 Cell culture-based assay
- •8.7.2 Dialysis
- •8.7.3 Microdialysis
- •8.7.4 Ultrafiltration
- •8.7.5 Chromatography
- •8.7.6 Ligand fishing
- •8.8 Limitations
- •8.9 Molecular modelling and np database
- •8.10 Future thrust
- •8.11 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •9. Strategies for Isolation and Identification of Bioactive Molecules from Natural Sources
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Bioactive compounds in natural sources and their pharmacological properties
- •9.3.1 Selection of materials
- •9.3.3 Types and properties of solvent for extraction
- •9.4 Extraction methods (conventional and modern)
- •9.4.1 Conventional methods
- •9.4.2 Novel extraction methods
- •9.5 Concentration and purification of bioactive molecules using chromatographic techniques
- •9.5.1 Separation based on adsorption properties
- •9.5.2 Separation based on partition coefficient
- •9.5.3 Separation based on the molecular size
- •9.5.4 Separation based on ionic strength
- •9.5.5 Other modern separation techniques
- •9.6 Identification and characterization of bioactive molecules
- •9.6.1 Qualitative and quantitative techniques/chromatographic or nonchromatographic techniques
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •Keywords
- •References
- •10. Role of Omics in Natural Product-Based Drug Discovery
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Genomics and transcriptomics in natural product discovery
- •10.2.1 Case studies and examples of natural product discovery using genomics and transcriptomics
- •10.2.2 Limitations and challenges of using genomics and transcriptomics in natural product discovery
- •10.3 Proteomics and metabolomics in natural product discovery
- •10.3.1 Case studies and examples of natural product discovery using proteomics and metabolomics
- •10.4 Bioinformatics in natural product-based drug discovery
- •10.4.1 Role of bioinformatics in natural product-based drug discovery
- •10.4.2 The use of bioinformatics to predict and annotate natural product biosynthetic pathways, gene clusters, and metabolomics
- •10.7 Future perspectives and potential impact of omics in natural product-based drug discovery
- •10.9 Potential impact on drug discovery and development
- •10.10 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •11. Natural Products from Endophytic Microorganisms
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.1 Rational/why endophytes?
- •11.2 Diversity of endophytic microorganisms
- •11.2.1 Endophytic bacteria and endophytic actinomycetes
- •11.2.2 Endophytic fungi
- •11.3.1 ISolation methods
- •11.3.1.1.1 Dilution Plating
- •11.3.1.1.2 Direct Plating
- •11.3.2 Identification methods
- •11.4 Bioactive compounds from endophytic microorganisms
- •11.4.1 Antibiotics
- •11.4.2 Antifungal agents
- •11.4.3 Antimalarial agents
- •11.4.4 Antiviral agents
- •11.4.5 Anticancer agents
- •11.4.6 Antioxidants
- •11.5 Stepwise methods for natural product discovery from endophytic microorganisms
- •11.5.1 Plant selection rationale
- •11.5.2 Isolation and cultivation of endophytes
- •11.5.3 Characterization of endophytes
- •11.5.4 Extraction of natural products
- •11.5.5 Purification of natural products
- •11.6 Biosynthesis and strategies for the optimization of natural product discovery from endophytic microorganisms
- •11.6.1 Exploration of novel microbial sources
- •11.6.2 Metabolomics-guided discovery
- •11.6.3 Coculture
- •11.6.4 Genome mining
- •11.6.5 Modulation by ultraviolent irradiation
- •11.7 Future directions and challenges
- •11.7.1 Improving the efficiency and accuracy of screening methods
- •11.7.2 Enhancing the scalability and affordability of production methods
- •11.7.3 Ensure natural product safety and efficacy
- •11.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •12. Natural Products with Antidiabetic Properties
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Natural products that regulate glucose absorption
- •12.2.1 Serotonin-derived products
- •12.2.2 Butyl-isobutyl-phthalate from laminaria japonica
- •12.2.3 Bioactive compounds of allium cepa and allium sativum
- •12.2.4 Elatosides E and F of aralia elata
- •12.2.5 Bioactive compounds of bauhinia candicans and bauhinia forficate
- •12.3 Natural products that enhance insulin sensitivity
- •12.3.1 Astragalus membranaceus polysaccharides
- •12.3.2 Bioactive compounds of litchi chinensis
- •12.3.3 Bioactive compounds of fenugreek
- •12.3.4 Bioactive compounds of cinnamon
- •12.3.5 Bioactive compounds of gastrodia elata
- •12.3.6 Polysaccharides of dioscorea
- •12.3.7 Anthocyanins of blueberries
- •12.3.8 Bioactive compounds of psidium guajava
- •12.4.1 Gingerol from zingiber officinale
- •12.4.2 Curcumin from curcuma longa
- •12.4.3 Berberine
- •12.4.4 Capsaicin of pepper
- •12.4.5 Bioactive compounds of bitter melon
- •12.4.6 Ginsenosides of ginseng
- •12.4.7 Bioactive compounds of aloe vera
- •12.4.8 Quinides of coffee
- •12.4.9 Bioactive compounds of tinospora cordifolia
- •12.4.10 Bioactive compounds of pterocarpus marsupium
- •12.4.11 Eugenol of ocimum sanctum
- •12.4.12 Bioactive compounds of syzygium densiflorum
- •12.5 Clinical trials based on antidiabetic effects of natural products derived from plants
- •12.5.1 Gymnema sylvestre (gurmar)
- •12.5.2 Fenugreek (trigonella foenum-graecum)
- •12.5.3 Tea catechins
- •12.5.4 Coffee
- •12.5.5 Rosemary (rosmarinus officinalis)
- •12.6 Conclusion
- •12.7 Future scope
- •Keywords
- •References
- •13. Marine-Derived Natural Products with Anticancer Properties
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Marine bioactive compounds
- •13.3 Anticancer activity of marine plants
- •13.4 Anticancer agents from marine floras
- •13.5.1 Antioxidants
- •13.5.2 Immunomodulation and apoptosis
- •13.5.3 Nutritional values and anticancer effects
- •13.6 Nature and cancer chemotherapy
- •13.7 Marine organisms and cancer chemotherapy
- •13.8 Anticancer agents from marine floras
- •13.9 Marine plants
- •13.9.1 Macro algae (seaweed)
- •13.9.2 Mangroves and other higher plants
- •13.9.3 Cyanobacteria
- •13.9.4 Bacteria
- •13.9.5 Proteobacteria
- •13.9.6 Cyanobacteria
- •13.9.7 Actinomycetes
- •13.9.8 Marine fungi
- •13.9.9 Soft corals
- •13.9.10 Marine sponges
- •13.10 Anticancer bioactive antibiotics derived from marine sources
- •13.10.1 Polyphenols
- •13.10.2 Polysaccharides
- •13.10.3 Alkaloids
- •13.11 Other marine sources for anticancer compounds
- •13.11.1 Peptides
- •13.11.2 Plitidepsin
- •13.11.3 Trabectedin
- •13.11.4 Lurbinectedin
- •13.12 Marine natural products as anticancer drugs
- •13.13.1 Aquaculture/cultivation
- •13.13.2 Genetic engineering
- •13.13.3 Synthesis/semisynthesis/modification
- •13.14 Conclusions and future prospects
- •References
- •14. Natural Products as Novel Opportunities for Cathepsin Inhibitors
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Cysteine proteases (CPs)
- •14.2.1 Cathepsin
- •14.2.2 Structure and mechanism of action of cathepsins
- •14.3 NPs as cathepsins inhibitors
- •14.3.1 NPs From bacteria as cathepsin inhibitors
- •14.3.2 NPs from fungus as cathepsin inhibitors
- •14.3.3 NPs from marine organism as cathepsin inhibitors
- •14.3.4 NPs from plants as cathepsin inhibitors
- •14.4 Conclusion and future pespectives
- •Keywords
- •References
- •15. Phytoestrogens in Drug Discovery: A Focus on Mechanisms of Action and Safety Assessment
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Phytoestrogens and estrogen receptors
- •15.3 Nonestrogen receptor-mediated effects of phytoestrogens
- •15.3.1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway
- •15.3.2 PI3K/AKT pathway
- •15.3.3 WNT pathway
- •15.3.4 G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER)
- •15.4 Structure–activity relationship (SAR) of phytoestrogens
- •15.4.1 Isoflavones
- •15.4.2 Lignans
- •15.4.3 Coumestans
- •15.4.4 Stilbenes
- •15.4.5 Diarylheptanoids
- •15.5 Comparing potency and efficacy of phytoestrogens on various pathways
- •15.5.1 Potency and efficacy of phytoestrogens on different pathways
- •15.5.2 Possible synergistic effects of phytoestrogens with other drugs
- •15.6 Effects of phytoestrogens on the human organs
- •15.7 Safety Assessment of phytoestrogens
- •15.7.1 Toxicity assays used to evaluate the safety of phytoestrogens
- •15.7.2 Potential adverse effects of phytoestrogens
- •15.8 Case study
- •15.8.1 Vaginal cellular differentiation assay
- •15.8.2 Changes in rat body weight
- •15.8.3 Changes in rats’ uterus weight
- •15.9 Current trends in phytoestrogen research
- •15.9.1 Publication trends
- •15.9.2 Analysis of contributing countries and contributing institutions
- •15.9.3 Analysis of contributing publishers and journals
- •15.9.4 Publication evolution and research areas
- •15.9.5 Limitations
- •15.10 Future directions
- •15.10.1 Exploration of unexplored plant sources
- •15.10.2 Understanding mechanisms of action
- •15.10.3 Synthesis of novel compounds
- •15.10.4 Development of SPERMs
- •15.10.5 Safety assessment
- •15.11 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •16. Honey Bee Products with Antimicrobial Properties
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Honey
- •16.3 Bee bread (perga)
- •16.4 Bee pollen
- •16.5 Bee propolis
- •16.6 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •17. Natural Products for the Prevention of Leaky Gut
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 The physical and chemical barriers of the intestine
- •17.2.1 Thick mucus layer
- •17.2.2 Intestinal epithelial cells (IECS)
- •17.2.3 Intestinal junctional complexes
- •17.2.4 Lamina propria
- •17.2.5 Intestinal regulatory T cells
- •17.2.6 Intestinal alkaline phosphatase
- •17.2.7 Antimicrobial peptides
- •17.2.8 Lysozyme
- •17.3 Mechanistic view of factors leading to a leaky gut
- •17.3.1 Gut dysbiosis
- •17.3.2 Mucosal inflammation and oxidative stress
- •17.3.3 TJ disruption
- •17.3.4 Genetics
- •17.3.5 Drugs
- •17.4 Pathological implications of a leaky gut
- •17.5 Natural product improving gut microbial dysbiosis
- •17.5.1 Traditional herbs and polyherbal formulations managing gut micro flora
- •17.5.2 Phytocompounds in the management of intestinal barrier integrity through balancing gut microflora
- •17.6.1 Anti-inflammatory traditional medicine and plant extracts ameliorating intestinal mucosal injury
- •17.6.2 Plant active constituents preventing mucosal injury and oxidative damage
- •17.7 Traditional medicine and natural products upregulating the TJ proteins
- •17.7.1 Traditional medicine and herbal extracts promoting junction protein protection
- •17.7.2 Phytocompounds for junction protein protection
- •17.8 Natural products averting pathological conditions through maintaining intestinal barrier function
- •17.9 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •18. Role of Natural Products in the Pharmacotherapy of Osteoporosis
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.1.1 Effect of traditional chinese medicine (TCM)
- •18.1.2 Effect of malay traditional medicine
- •18.1.3 Antiosteoporotic agents extracted from plant sources
- •18.1.4 Treatment by different pigments
- •18.1.5 Other herbal sources
- •18.1.6 Natural plant-based alkaloids
- •18.1.7 Essential markers involved in bone formation and resorption for osteoporosis treatment
- •18.2 Conclusion
- •Keywords
- •References
- •19. Gel-Based Natural Therapeutics: Potential Alternatives to Traditional Drug Delivery Systems in Aquaculture
- •19.1 INtroduction
- •19.2 DDS
- •19.2.1 Water medication
- •19.3 Oral administration
- •19.3.1 Gavage

343
markets in China. NPs derived from Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs) represent a
valuable source of structurally diverse bioactive compounds for potential drug discovery.
FIGURE 14.27 Chemical structures of dipeptide asperphenamate (91) isolated from raw malt.
⏎
At an initial concentration of 12.5 µg/mL, the researchers screened several TCM extracts
to identify potential antiviral agents against loviruses and emerging viral pathogens. This
screening unveiled that extracts from the Rhodiola rosea plant exhibited specic inhibitory
effects on the entry and infection of both EBOV and MARV. Additionally, two chemically
related compounds, gallic acid (92) and ellagic acid (93), were isolated from R. rosea
(Figure 14.28). These compounds demonstrated the ability to effectively hinder EBOV
entry and, to a somewhat lesser extent, MARV entry.
FIGURE 14.28 Chemical structures of gallic acid (92) and ellagic acid (93) isolated from R. rosea.
⏎

344
These ndings underscore the potential of R. rosea, and potentially other TCMs, as
potent anti-EBOV agents that warrant further exploration and development as antiviral
therapies. The screening approach primarily focused on targeting the viral entry process,
which is regulated by the glycoproteins (GPs) found on the viral particle’s surface.
The unaltered structure of EBOV and MARV GP consists of a trimeric arrangement of
GP1/GP2 heterodimers. GP1 is responsible for recognizing and binding to receptors, while
GP2 facilitates fusion between the viral and host cell membranes within the endosome. Both
EBOV and MAR V GPs can recognize attachment factors like glycosaminoglycans and C-type
lectins, thereby facilitating the internalization of viral particles through macropinocytosis.
Once inside the host cell, the virions traverse the endosomal–lysosomal system. The
GPs undergo cleavage by Caths B and L (Schornberg et al., 2006), exposing a specic
region of the GP that allows it to bind to Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1), the internal receptor
for EBOV and MARV. This cathepsin-mediated cleavage of the GP triggers a critical
conformational change required for subsequent fusion (Brecher et al., 2012).
Caths B and L are essential for activating EBOV but not MARV GPs to facilitate
efcient entry into cell lines and macrophages, independent of TMPRSS2 expression
(Gnirss et al., 2012). Interaction between the GP and NPC1 is crucial for the fusion of
the viral membrane with the host endosomal membrane. This fusion transpires within late
endosome/lysosome compartments, liberating the viral capsid into the cell cytoplasm and
initiating viral genome replication.
The results from time-of-addition experiments suggest that the inhibitors primarily act
at a postbinding step in the endosome. Here, the Cath B inhibitor or entry inhibitor binds
to the EBOV–GP protein, disrupting GP-mediated fusion within the endosome. Ellagic
acid (93) exhibited an IC50 value of 1.4 µM against EBOV and 6.4 µM against MARV
pseudovirions, surpassing the antilovirus activity of gallic acid (92), which displayed
IC50 values of 10.5 and 25.4 µM, respectively.
Furthermore, both compounds exhibited negligible toxicity in A549 cells, with CC50
IC50 values of 309 and 122 µM for gallic acid ( 92) and ellagic acid (93), respectively.
These results suggest that gallic acid (92) and ellagic acid (93) are likely the major active
components contributing to the antiloviral activity of R. rosea.
In testing, the extract from R. rosea, along with gallic acid (92) and ellagic acid (93),
effectively inhibited infectious EBOV in HeLa cells. The IC50 value for the R. r osea extract
was determined to be 3.9 µg/mL, whereas gallic acid (92) and ellagic acid (93) exhibited
IC50 values of 25.4 and 10.5 µM, respectively.
These ndings emphasize the potential of exploring TCMs and NPs as promising candidates for the development of antiviral treatments against EBOV and other viral pathogens
(Cui et al., 2018).
Phenolic compounds, such as caffeic acid (94) and its derivatives, have been studied for
their inhibitory activity against human Caths B and L (Figure 14.29). The most promising
nding of this investigation is that caffeic acid (94) inhibited Cath B, with an IC50 value
of 110 µM. Caffeic acid acts as a linear inhibitor through mixed mechanisms, binding to
both the enzyme and the enzyme-substrate complex with different afnities. Caffeic acid
(94) not only selectively inhibits Cath B but also preferentially inhibits its endoproteolytic
activity without affecting the peptidyl-dipeptidase activity (Ulčakar and Novinec, 2021).

345
FIGURE 14.29 Chemical structures of caffeic acid (94).
⏎
Zingiber ocinale Roscoe, commonly known as ginger, belongs to the family
Zingiberaceae. Ginger rhizomes originate from southeastern Asia and have been used
in traditional medicine for centuries to treat various rheumatic diseases, including osteoarthritis (Srivastava and Mustafa, 1992). Cath K has recently emerged as an important
therapeutic target for osteoarthritis, driving the discovery of drugs aimed at preventing
bone and cartilage destruction. Studies have demonstrated the potential benets of
ginger extract in the treatment of osteoarthritis (Funk et al., 2009). In a clinical trial,
osteoarthritis patients received ginger extract and experienced a reduction in symptoms
with a high level of safety (Altman and Marcussen, 2001). 6-Shogaol (95) is the most
active derivative of ginger and has been isolated from ginger (Villalvilla et al., 2014)
(Figure 14.30). 6-Shogaol (95) inhibits TLR4-mediated inammatory responses and Cath
K activity through a completely uncompetitive mechanism (with an αKi value of 16.65
µM). Specically, 6-shogaol (95) blocks TLR4-mediated nitric oxide (NO) production
and reduces IL-6- and MCP-1-induced expression. Increased NO levels are known to
induce chondrocyte apoptosis, matrix degradation, and promotion of chondrocyte inammatory responses. Inhibition of NO production by 6-shogaol (95) may contribute to the
improvement of cartilage inammatory and degradative processes. Furthermore, the
reduction of IL-6- and MCP-1-induced expression by 6-shogaol (95) may also improve
these processes, as both factors play a key role in the progression of osteoarthritis. During
the osteoarthritis process, these innate immune responses are accompanied by increased
degradative activity supported by elevated MMP expression (Villalvilla et al., 2014).
FIGURE 14.30 Chemical structures of 6-shogaol (95) isolated from Zingiber officinale Roscoe.
⏎
Likewise, Silva et al. (2021) conducted a bioassay-guided study using ginger. They
isolated and identied 15 compounds from the dichloromethane soluble fraction of ginger.
The inhibitory activity against Caths K, L, and V enzymes was determined. The compounds

346
showed moderate inhibitory activity against only Cath K at an initial inhibitor concentration of 125 μM, with the highest inhibitory effects observed for compounds (96)–(100)
(Figure 14.31). Compound (98) exhibited the greatest inhibitory effect on Cath K, followed
by compounds (96)–(98), and (100). The IC50 values for compounds (96)–(100) were
determined to be 10.4, 21.1, 5.8, 54.4, and 55.3 µM, respectively . All compounds displayed
greater selectivity for Cath K. Compound (98) showed higher selectivity for Cath K over
Cath V, while compounds (96) and (97) showed higher selectivity for Cath K over Cath L.
The observation revealed that compounds with a larger side chain demonstrated increased
inhibitory activity against Cath K, indicating that hydrophobicity plays a crucial role as
a physicochemical factor for bioactivity within this compound class. For [10]-gingerol
(96), the inhibition type was determined to be uncompetitive (with a Ki value of 10.8 μM).
[10]-Gingerol (96) was docked onto the allosteric site of Cath K, corroborating the experi-
mentally determined inhibitory effect. Recently, the signicant potential of [10]-gingerol
(96) in inhibiting osteoclastogenesis has been discovered (Zang et al., 2021), reinforcing
its potential as a candidate for an antiresorptive drug.
FIGURE 14.31 Chemical structures of [10]-gingerol (96) and derivated (97)–(100) isolated from Zingiber
officinale Roscoe.
⏎

347
Cath L is a CP found within endosomes, and it plays a pivotal role in cleaving the S1
subunit of the coronavirus surface spike GP. This cleavage event is essential for facilitating
coronavirus entry into human host cells, promoting fusion between the virus and the host
cell endosome membrane, and releasing viral RNA for subsequent rounds of replication.
When SARS-CoV -2 enters intracellular endosomes, Cath L emer ges as the primary protease
responsible for cleaving the virus’s S1 subunit. Notably, this CP functions most effectively
under acidic pH conditions (Gomes et al., 2020). The development of Cath L-selective
inhibitors holds great potential for blocking coronavirus entry into host cells and providing
a mechanism to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Cath L has been demonstrated
to be important for virus entry and possibly exit during the late stages of infection. Drugs
that can inhibit Cath L offer potential therapy for COVID-19.
Utami et al. (2022) conducted a comprehensive computational docking analysis,
specically focusing on Cath L, to evaluate the inhibitory activity of bioactive compounds
isolated from Stachytarpheta jamaicensis for their potential role in COVID-19 drug therapy .
S. jamaicensis is a plant from the Verbenaceae family that is commonly used for medicinal
purposes. T en NPs were described in the extracts of S. jamaicensis: α-spinasterol, apigenin,
luteolol-7-glucuronide, friedelin, hispidulin, chlorogenic acid, ipolamiide, geraniol,
hentriacontane, and γ-aminobutyric acid. All compounds were selected as ligands. Among
them, α-spinasterol, apigenin, luteolol-7-glucuronide, friedelin, hispidulin, chlorogenic
acid, and ipolamiide showed a stronger afnity for the active site of Cath L. Apigenin
demonstrated the best afnity with signicant hydrogen bonding (Utami et al., 2022). The
current research indicates that S. jamaicensis compounds can be used as inhibitors for Cath
L and as potential drug candidates for COVID-19.
14.4 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PESPECTIVES
The exploration of NPs for drug discovery holds immense potential, offering a vast array of
diverse structures and bioactivities that can serve as valuable starting points for novel drug
development. To fully harness the potential of NPs, it is essential to adopt a multidisciplinary approach and foster collaboration among experts from various scientific areas. By
combining knowledge in chemistry, pharmacology, molecular biology, and genetics, we
can maximize the chances of success in discovering and optimizing NP-based inhibitors
and lead compounds. Utilizing a wide range of scientific tools and techniques is crucial to
enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the discovery process.
It is noteworthy that a signicant proportion of clinically approved protease inhibitors
can be traced back to NPs or nature-inspired compounds. This highlights the valuable role
that NPs have played in the development of critical class drugs such as protease inhibitors.
Even in ongoing clinical trials, NP-related and inspired compounds continue to contribute
to the development of small molecule protease inhibitors.
As the demand for new drugs and therapeutic agents continues to grow , it is imperative
that we take specic actions to protect and develop our environment under sustainable
conditions. By doing so, we can ensure that the window of opportunity for the discovery of
new medicinal and biological agents remains open. The continued exploration of NPs and

348
the application of advanced scientic approaches hold tremendous promise for the future
of drug discovery and the improvement of human health and longevity.
In summary, the search for NPs as inhibitors of cathepsins holds great signicance in
the eld of drug discovery. NPs offer unique chemical structures and diverse bioactivities
that can be utilized or optimized to develop novel drugs targeting cathepsins. They not only
expand the repertoire of therapeutic options but also provide opportunities for discovering
new mechanisms of action. With continued scientic and technological advancements,
NP-based drug discovery will continue to make substantial contributions to human health
and longevity.
KEYWORDS
• natural products
• cathepsins
• proteolytic activity
• Ebola virus
• mitogen-activated protein
REFERENCES
Al-Awadhi, F. H.; Ratnayake, R.; Paul, V. J. Luesch, H. Tasiamide F, a potent inhibitor of cathepsins D and E
from a marine cyanobacterium. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 3276–3282.
Altman, R. D.; Marcussen, K. C. Effects of a ginger extract on knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis
Rheum. 2001, 44, 2531–2538.
Ashhurst, A. S.; Tang, A. H.; Fajtová, P.; Yoon, M. C.; Aggarwal, A.; Bedding, M. J.; Stoye, A.; Beretta, L.;
Pwee, D.; Drelich, A.; Skinner, D.; Li, L.; Meek, T. D.; McKerrow, J. H.; Hook, V.; Tseng, C.-T.; Larance,
M.; Turville, S.; Gerwick, W. H.; O’Donoghue, A. J.; Payne, R. J. Potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity by
the natural product gallinamide a and analogues via inhibition of cathepsin L. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65,
2956−2970.
Barrett, A. J. Classification of peptidases. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 244, 1–15.
Baumann, H. I.; Keller, S.; Wolter, F. E.; Nicholson, G. J.; Jung, G.; Süssmuth, R. D.; Jüttner, F. Planktocyclin,
a cyclooctapeptide protease inhibitor produced by the freshwater cyanobacterium Planktothrix rubescens. J.
Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1611–1615.
Behl, T.; Chadha, S.; Sehgal, A.; Singh, S.; Sharma, N.; Kaur, R.; Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Chigurupati, S.;
Alhowail, A.; Bungau, S. Exploring the role of cathepsin in rheumatoid arthritis. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022,
29, 402–410
Berdowska, I. Cysteine proteases as disease markers. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2004, 342, 41–69.
Biasizzo, M.; Javoršek, U.; Vidak, E.; Zarić, M.; Turk, B. Cysteine cathepsins: A long and winding road towards
clinics. Mol. Aspects Med. 2022, 88, 101150.
Böck, B. Shaping texts and text genres: On the drug lore of Babylonian practitioners of medicine. Aula
Orientalis. 2015, 33, 21–38.
Bosea, S. J.; Ayagamaa, T.; Burton. R. A. B. Lysosomal proteases and their role in signaling pathways. In:
Zelanis, A. (Ed.), Proteolytic Signaling in Health and Disease. Academic Press: London. 2022, pp. 41–61.

349
Bossard, M. J.; Tomaszek, T. A.; Thompson, S. K.; Amegadzie, Y. B.; Hanning, C. R.; Jones, C.; Kurdyla, J.
T.; McNulty, D. E.; Drake, F. H.; Gowen, M.; Levy, M. A. Proteolytic activity of human osteoclast cathepsin
K expression, purification, activation, and substrate identification. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 12517–12524.
Boudreau, P. D.; Miller, B. W.; McCall, L.-I.; Almaliti, J.; Reher, R.; Hirata, K.; Le, T.; Siqueira-Neto, J. L.;
Hook, V.; Gerwick, W. H. Design of Gallinamide A analogs as potent inhibitors of the cysteine proteases
human cathepsin L and trypanosoma cruzi Cruzain. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 9026−9044.
Brecher, M.; Schornberg, K. L.; Delos, S. E.; Fusco, M. L.; Saphire, E. O.; White, J. M. Cathepsin cleavage
potentiates the Ebola virus glycoprotein to undergo a subsequent fusion-relevant conformational change. J.
Virol. 2012, 86, 364–372
Brömme, D. Papain-like cysteine proteases. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2001, 21, 21–22.
Brzin, J.; Popovic', T.; Ritonja, A.; Puizdar, V.; Kidric’, M. Related cystatin inhibitors from leaf and seed
Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Sci. 1998, 138, 17–26.
Chandran, K.; Nibert, M. L. Animal cell invasion by a large nonenveloped virus: Reovirus delivers the goods.
Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11, 374–382.
Chandran, K.; Sullivan, N. J.; Felbor, U.; Whelan, S. P.; Cunningham, J. M. Endosomal proteolysis of the Ebola
virus glycoprotein is necessary for infection. Science. 2005, 308, 1643–1645.
Chen, C.-C.; Huang, Y.-L.; Ou, J.-C.; Lin, C.-F.; Pan, T.-M. Three new prenylflavones from Artocarpus altilis.
J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1594–1597.
Clardy, J.; Walsh, C. Lessons from natural molecules. Nature. 2004, 432, 829–837.
Cragg, G. M.; Newman, D. J. Biodiversity: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Pure Appl. Chem. 2005,
77, 7–24.
Cui, Q.; Du, R.; Anantpadma, M.; Schafer , A.; Hou, L.; Tian, J.; Davey, R. A.; Cheng, H.; Rong, L. Identification
of ellagic acid from plant Rhodiola rosea L. as an Anti-Ebola Virus entry inhibitor. Viruses. 2018, 10, 152.
Davie, E. W.; Neurath, H. Identification of a peptide released during autocatalytic activation of trypsinogen. J.
Biol. Chem. 1955, 212, 515–529.
Davie, E. W.; Ratnoff, O. D. Waterfall sequence for intrinsic blood clotting. Science. 1964, 145, 1310–1312.
Di Domenico, F.; Tramutola, A.; Perluigi, M. Cathepsin D as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease.
Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets. 2016, 20, 1393–1395.
Diederich, S.; Sauerhering, L.; Weis, M.; Altmeppen, H.; Schaschke, N.; Reinheckel, T.; Erbar, S.; Maisner,
A. Activation of the Nipah virus fusion protein in MDCK cells is mediated by cathepsin B within the
endosomal-recycling compartment. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 3736–3745
Droga-Mazovec, G.; Bojič, L.; Petelin, A.; Ivanova, S.; Romih, R.; Repnik, U.; Salvesen, G. S.; Stoka, V.;
Turk, V.; Turk, B. Cysteine cathepsins trigger caspase-dependent cell death through cleavage of bid and
antiapoptotic Bcl-2 homologues. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 19140–19150.
Ebert, D. H.; Deussing, J.; Peters, C.; Dermody. T . S. Cathepsin L and cathepsin B mediate reovirus disassembly
in murine fibroblast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002,
Funk, J. L.; Frye, J. B.; Oyarzo, J. N.; Timmermann, B. N. Comparative effects of two gingerol-containing
Zingiber officinale extracts on experimental rheumatoid arthritis. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 403–407.
Fusetani, M.; Fujita, M.; Nakao, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; van Soest, R. W. Tokaramide A, a new cathepsin B inhibitor
from the marine sponge Theonellaaff. mirabilis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 3397–3402.
Gnirss, K.; Kuhl, A.; Karsten, C.; Glowacka, I.; Bertram, S.; Kaup, F.; Hofmann, H. Pohlmann, S. Cathepsins B
and L activate Ebola but not Marburg virus glycoproteins for efficient entry into cell lines and macrophages
independent of TMPRSS2 expression. Virology. 2012, 424, 3–10
Gomes, C. P.; Fernandes, D. E.; Casimiro, F.; da Mata, G. F.; Passos, M. T.; Varela, P.; Mastroianni-Kirsztajn,
G.; Pesquero, J. B. Cathepsin L in COVID-19: From pharmacological evidences to genetics. Front. Cell
Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 589505.
Goulet, B.; Baruch, A.; Moon, N. S.; Poirier, M.; Sansregret, L. L.; Erickson, A.; Bogyo, M.; Nepveu, A. A
Cathepsin L isoform that is devoid of a signal peptide localizes to the nucleus in S phase and processes the
CDP/Cux transcription factor. Mol. Cell. 2004, 14, 207–219.
Goursalin, B. J.; Lachance, P.; Bonneau, P. R.; Storer, A. C.; Kirschke, H.; Broemme, D. E-64 analogs as
inhibitors of cathepsin L and cathepsin S: Importance of the S2-P2 interactions for potency and selectivity.
Bioorg. Chem. 1994, 22, 227–241.
277, 24609–24617.

350
Grzonka, Z.; Kasprzykowski, F .; Wiczk, W . Cysteine proteases. In: Polaina, J.; MacCabe, A. P. (Eds.), Industrial
Enzymes. Springer: Dordrecht. 2007, pp. 181–195.
Hamato, N.; T akano, R.; Kamei-Hayashi, K.; Imada, C.; Hara, S. Leupeptins produced by the marine Alteromonas
sp. B-10-31. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 110, 856–858.
Hanada, K.; Tamao, M.; Yamagishi, M.; Ohmura, S.; Sawada, I.; Tanaka, I. Isolation and characterization of
E-64, a new thiol protease inhibitor. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1978, 42, 523–528.
Hoang, V. L. T.; Li, Y.; Kim, S.-K. Cathepsin B inhibitory activities of phthalates isolated from a marine
Pseudomonas strain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2083–2088.
Hook, V. V.; Yoon, M.; Mosier, C.; Ito, G.; Podvin, S.; Head, B. P.; Rissman, R.; O'Donoghue, A. J.; Hook, G.
Cathepsin B in neurodegeneration of Alzheimer's disease, traumatic brain injury, and related brain disorders.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2020, 1868, 140428.
Imada, C.; Hara, S.; Maeda, M.; Simidu, U. Amino acid sequences of marinostatins C-1 and C-2 from marine
Alteromonas sp. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1986, 52, 1455–1459.
Imada, C.; Maeda, M.; Hara, S.; T aga, N.; Simidu, U. Purification and characterization of the subtilisin inhibitor
‘marinostatin’ produced by marine Alteromonas sp. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1986, 60, 469–476.
Imada, C.; Maeda, M.; Taga, N. Purification and characterization of the protease inhibitor 'monastatin' from a
marine Alteromonas sp. with reference to inhibition of the protease produced by a bacterium pathogenic to
fish. Can. J. Microbiol. 1985, 31, 1089–1094.
Imada, C.; Simidu, U.; Taga, N.; Isolation and characterization of marine bacteria producing alkaline protease
inhibitor. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1985, 51, 799–803.
Isshiki, K.; Nishio, M.; Sakurai, N.; Uchida, T.; Okuda, T.; Komatsubara, S. TMC-52A to D, novel cysteine
proteinase inhibitors, produced by Gliocladium sp. J. Antibiot. (T okyo). 1998, 51, 629–634.
Jedeszko, C.; Sloane, B. F. Cysteine cathepsins in human cancer. Biol. Chem. 2004, 385, 1017–1027.
Jeong, J.-C.; Kang, S.-K.; Y oun, C.-H.; Jeong, C.-W .; Kim, H.-M.; Lee, Y .-C.; Chang, Y .-C.; Kim, C.-H. Inhibition
of Drynariae Rhizoma extracts on bone resorption mediated by processing of cathepsin K in cultured mouse
osteoclasts. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2003, 3, 1685–1697.
Kassem, M. E. S.; El-Desoky, S. K.; Sharaf, M. Biphenyl esters and biflavonoids from the fruits of Schinus
terebenthefolus. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2004, 40, 447–450.
Katunuma, N. Posttranslational processing and modification of cathepsins and cystatins. J. Signal Transduct.
2010, 2010, 375345.
Ketterer, S.; Gomez-Auli, A.; Hillebrand, L. E.; Petrera, A.; Ketscher, A.; Reinheckel, T. Inherited diseases
caused by mutations in cathepsin protease genes. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 1437–1454.
Kim, J. W.; Jung, S. Y.; Kim, Y.; Heo, H.; Hong, C. H.; Seo, S. W.; Choi, S. H.; Son, S. J.; Lee, S.; Chang, J.
Identification of cathepsin D as a plasma biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2021, 10, 138.
Klink, C. A.; Machado, R. B. Conservation of the Brazilian cerrado.
Kramer, L.; Turk, D.; Turk, B. The future of cysteine cathepsins in disease management. Trends Pharmacol.
Sci. 2017, 38, 873–898.
Kruglyak, N.; Williams, D. E. Chen, H. Law, S. Kaleta, J. Villanueva, I. Davies, J. E. Andersen, R. J.; Brömme,
D. Leupeptazin, a highly modified tripeptide isolated from cultures of a Streptomyces sp., inhibits cathepsin
K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 1397–1400.
Kwan, J. C.; Eksioglu, E. A.; Liu, C.; Paul, V. J.; Luesch, H. Grassystatins A-C from marine cyanobacteria,
potent cathepsin E inhibitors that reduce antigen presentation. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5732–5747.
Kwan, J. C.; Rocca, J. R.; Abboud, K. A.; Paul, V. J. Luesch, H. Total structure determination of grassypeptolide,
a new marine cyanobacterial cytotoxin. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 789–792.
Lecaille, F .; Kaleta, J.; Brömme, D. Human and parasitic papain-like cysteine proteases: Their role in physiology
and pathology and recent developments in inhibitor design. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4459–88.
Lee, M. S.; Cha, E. Y.; Su, J. Y.; Song, I. S.; Kim, J. Y. Chrysophanic acid blocks proliferation of colon cancer
cells by inhibiting EGFR/mTOR pathway. Phytother. Res. 2011, 25, 833–837.
Li, Y.; Ai, X.; Zou, C.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Men, J.; Liu, D.; Sheng, L.; Ruan, X.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Ma, E.; Yuan,
L. Discovery of a novel and selective cathepsin L inhibitor with anti-metastatic ability in vitro and in vivo
against breast cancer cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 115, 105256.
Ling, J.; W ang, J.; W ang, N.; Li, W.; Sha, Y.; Li, X. Study on the chemical constituents of malt. J. China Pharm.
Univ. 2005, 22, 267–270
Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19, 707–713.

351
Linington, R. G.; Clark, B. R.; Trimble, E. E.; Almanza, A.; Ureña, L.-D.; Kyle, D. E.; Gerwick, W. H.
Antimalarial peptides from marine cyanobacteria: Isolation and structural elucidation of gallinamide A. J.
Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 14–17.
Lua, J.; W anga, M.; Wanga, Z.; Fua, Z.; Lua, A.; Zhang, G. Advances in the discovery of cathepsin K inhibitors
on bone resorption. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 890–904.
MacFarland, R. G. An enzyme cascade in the blood clotting mechanism, and its function as a biochemical
amplifier. Nature. 1964, 202, 498–499.
Marques, E. F .; Vieira, P. C.; Severino, R. P. Alcaloides acridônicos inibem catepsina L e V. Quim. Nova. 2016,
39, 58–62.
Martins, F . T .; Assis, D. M.; dos Santos, M. H.; Camps, I.; Veloso, M. P .; Juliano, M. A.; Alves, L. C.; Doriguetto,
A. C. Natural polyprenylated benzophenones inhibiting cysteine and serine proteases. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2009, 19, 1477–1481.
McGrath, M. E. The lysosomal cysteine proteases. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1999, 28, 181–204.
Metwaly, A. M.; Ghoneim, M. M.; Eissa, I. H.; Elsehemy, I. A.; Mostafa, A. E.; Hegazy, M. M.; Afifi, W. M.;
Dou, D. Traditional ancient Egyptian medicine: A review. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 5823–5832.
Miller, B.; Friedman, A. J.; Choi, H.; Hogan, J.; McCammon, J. A.; Hook, V.; Gerwick, W. H. The marine
cyanobacterial metabolite gallinamide A is a potent and selective inhibitor of human cathepsin L. J. Nat.
Prod. 2014, 77, 92−99.
Molinski, T. F.; Reynolds, K. A.; Morinaka, B. I. Symplocin A, a linear peptide from the Bahamian
cyanobacterium Symploca sp. Configurational analysis of N,N-dimethylamino acids by chiral-phase HPLC
of naphthacyl esters. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 425−431.
Murayama, S.; Nakao, Y.; Matsunaga, S. Asteropterin, an inhibitor of cathepsin B, from the marine sponge
Asteropus simplex. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4186–4188.
Nakao, Y.; Fujita, M.; Warabi, K.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N. Miraziridine A, a novel cysteine protease
inhibitor from the marine sponge Theonellaaff. Mirabilis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10462–10463.
Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J. Nat. Prod. 2007,
70, 461–477.
Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from
01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803.
Nomura, T.; Katunuma, M. Involvement of cathepsins in the invasion, metastasis and proliferation of cancer
cells. J. Med. Invest. 2005, 52, 1–9.
Otsuka, T.; Muramatsu, Y.; Higaki, T.; Nakanishi, T.; Takase, S.; Hatanaka, H.; Okamoto, M.; Hino, M.;
Hashimoto, S.; Okamoto, M.; Hino, M.; Hashimoto, S. WF14861, a new cathepsins B and L inhibitor
produced by Colletotrichum sp. I. taxonomy, production, purification and structure elucidation. J. Antibiot.
(Tokyo). 1999, 52, 536–541.
Otsuka, T.; Muramatsu, Y.; Nakanishi, T.; Hatanaka, H.; Hashimoto, S. WF14865A and B, new cathepsins B
and L inhibitors produced by Aphanoascus fulvescens I. taxonomy, production, purification, and biological
properties. J. Antibiot. (T okyo). 2000, 53, 536–541.
Otsuka, T.; Muramatsu, Y.; Niikura, K.; Okamoto, M.; Hino, M.; Hashimoto, S. WF14861, a new cathepsins
B and L inhibitor produced by Colletotrichum sp. II. Biological properties. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo). 1999, 52,
542–547.
Pager, C. T.; Dutch. R. E. Cathepsin L is involved in proteolytic processing of the Hendra virus fusion protein.
J. Virol. 2005, 79, 12714–12720.
Pan, X.; Tan, N.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, R. Amentoflavone and its derivatives as novel natural inhibitors of
human Cathepsin B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 5819–5825.
Patel, S.; Homaei, A.; El-Seedi, H. R.; Akhtar, N. Cathepsins: Proteases that are vital for survival but can also
be fatal. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 105, 526–532
Patil, A. D.; Freyer, A. J.; Carte, B.; Taylor, P. B.; Johnson, R. K.; Faulkner, D. J. Haploscleridamine, a novel
tryptamine-derived alkaloid from a sponge of the order Haplosclerida: An inhibitor of Cathepsin K. J. Nat.
Prod. 2002, 65, 628–629.
Patil, A. D.; Freyer, A. J.; Killmer, L.; Offen, P.; Taylor, P. B.; Votta, B. J.; Johnson, R. K. A new dimeric
dihydrochalcone and a new prenylated flavone from the bud covers of Artocarpus altilis: Potent inhibitors of
Cathepsin K. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 624–627.

352
Petushkova, A. I.; Savvateeva, L. V.; Korolev, D. O.; Zamyatnin Jr, A. A. Cysteine cathepsins: Potential
applications in diagnostics and therapy of malignant tumors. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2019, 84, 746–761.
Pinheiro, M. H. O.; Monteiro, R. Contribution to the discussions on the origin of the cerrado biome: Brazilian
savanna. Braz. J. Biol. 2010, 70, 95–102.
Powers, J. C.; Asgian, J. L.; Ekici, Ö.; James, K. E. Irreversible inhibitors of serine, cysteine, and threonine
proteases. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4639–4750.
Qiu, Z.-C.; Dong, X.-L.; Dai, Y.; Xiao, G.-K.; Wang, X.-L.; Wong, K.-C.; Wong, M.-S.; Yao, X.-S. Discovery
of a new class of cathepsin K inhibitors in Rhizoma Drynariae as potential candidates for the treatment of
osteoporosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2116.
Ramalho, S. D.; de Sousa, L. R.; Burger, M. C.; Lima, M. I.; da Silva, M. F.; Fernandes, J. B.; Vieira, P. C.
Evaluation of flavonols and derivatives as human cathepsin B inhibitor. Nat. Pr od. Res. 2015, 29, 2212–2214.
Ramalho, S. D.; de Sousa, L. R..; Nebo, L.; Maganhi, S. H.; Caracelli, I.; Zukerman-Schpector, J.; Lima, M. I.;
Alves, M. F .; da Silva, M. F.; Fernandes, J. B. Vieira, P. C. Triterpenoids as novel natural inhibitors of human
cathepsin L. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 1354–1363.
Ratter, J. A.; Ribeiro, J. F.; Bridgewater, S. The Brazilian Cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiversity . Ann.
Bot. 1997, 80, 223–230.
Rawlings, N. D.; Barrett, A. J. Introduction: The clans and families of cysteine peptidases. In: Rawlings, N. D.; Guy
Salvesen, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes. Academic Press: London. 2013, V ol. 2; pp. 1743–1773.
Salminen-Mankonen, H. J.; Morko, J.; V uorio, E. Role of Cathepsin K in normal joints and in the development
of arthritis. Curr. Drug. Targets. 2007, 8, 315–323
Sanchez, A. Analysis of filovirus entry into vero e6 cells, using inhibitors of endocytosis, endosomal
acidification, structural integrity, and cathepsin (B and L) activity. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196, S251–258.
Sarria, A. L. F.; Silva, T. L.; Oliveira, J. M.; Oliveira, M. A. R.; Fernandes, J. B.; da Silva, M. F. G. F.; Vieira,
P. C.; Venancio, T.; Alves Filho, E. G.; Batista Jr., J. M.; Guido, R. V. Dimeric chalcone derivatives from
Myracrodruon urundeuva act as cathepsin V inhibitors. Phytochemistry. 2018, 154, 31–38.
Schornberg, K.; Matsuyama, S.; Kabsch, K.; Delos, S.; Bouton, A.; White, J. Role of endosomal cathepsins in
entry mediated by the Ebola virus glycoprotein. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 4174–4178.
Severino, R. P .; Guido, R. V. C.; Marques, E. F.; Brömme, D.; da Silva, M. F . G. F.; Fernandes, J. B.; Andricopulo,
A. D.; Vieira, P. C. Acridone alkaloids as potent inhibitors of cathepsin V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19,
1477–1481.
Silva, J. A.; dos Santos, C. Y.; Mohammadi, M.; Fernandes, J. B.; Maria Fátima das Graças Fernandes da Silva,
M. F. G.; Vieira, P. C. Cathepsin K Inhibitors Isolated from Ginger Rhizome. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2021,
31, 859–864.
Silva, T. L.; Fernandes, J. B.; da Silva, M. F. G. F.; Consolaro, H. N.; de Sousa, L. R. F.; Vieira, P. C. New
cathepsin V inhibitor from stems of Bowdichia virgilioides. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2019, 29, 491–494.
Simmons, G.; Gosalia, D. N.; Rennekamp, A. J.; Reeves, J. D.; Diamond, S. L.; Bates, P. Inhibitors of cathepsin L
prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Pr oc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005, 102, 1 1876–11881.
Sloane, B. F.; Dunn, J. R.; Honn, K. V. Lysosomal cathepsin B: Correlation with metastatic potential. Science.
1981, 212, 1151–1153.
Srivastava, K. C.; Mustafa, T. Ginger (Zingiber officinale) in rheumatism and musculoskeletal disorders. Med.
Hypotheses. 1992, 39, 342–348.
Suda, T.; Aoyagi, T.; Hamada, M.; Takeuchi, T.; Umezawa, H.; Leupeptazin, a highly modified tripeptide
isolated from cultures of a Streptomyces sp. inhibits cathepsin K. J. Antibiot. 1972, 25, 263–266.
Sugita, H.; Ishiura, S.; Suzuki, K.; Imahori, K. Inhibition of epoxide derivatives on chicken calcium-activated
neutral protease (CANP) in vitro and in vivo. J. Biochem. 1980, 87, 339–341.
Teramura, K.; Orita, M.; Matsumoto, H.; Y asumuro, K.; Abe, K. Effects of Ym-51084 and Ym-51085, new inhibitors
produced by Streptomyces sp. Q21705, on cathepsin L. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 1996, 11, 115–121.
Turk, B. T argeting proteases: Successes, failures, and future prospects. Nat. Rev . Drug Discov . 2006, 5, 785–799.
Turk, B.; Turk, D.; Salvesen, G. S. Cysteine protease activity: Regulating essential role of protease inhibitors
as guardians and regulators. Med. Chem. Rev. 2005, 2, 283–297.
Turk, B.; T urk, D.; Turk, V . Lysosomal cysteine proteases: More than scavengers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000,
1477, 98–111.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
