Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6035_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
 203
this parathion of the bioactive compounds, several isolation procedures, namely, thin layer
chromatography, ash chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, column
chromatography, and Sephadex chromatography have to be employed to attain the desired
bioactive compounds with the greatest purity. The puried complexes were then taken
for quality characterization which involves structural as well as biological determination (Sasidharan et al., 2011).
FIGURE 9.1 Process flowchart showing the process of purification and utilization of bioactive compounds.

9.6.1 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES/CHROMATOGRAPHIC OR NONCHROMATOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES


TLC is an easy, fast, low-cost technique that provides researchers with rapid answers about the number of constituents present in a mixture. Furthermore, TLC is also employed to confirm the characteristics of the desired compounds present in a mixture by comparing the retardation factor (Rf) of a compound to the Rf of an identified compound. Further tests in the identification of compounds include spraying of phyto­chemical screening reagents that lead to the alteration in visual properties which depend on the phytochemical’s presence in the plant extract. Alternatively, the plate is observed in UV light. It has also been utilized to confirm the purity as well as identification of the isolated compounds (Sasidharan et al., 2011).
In comparison to other chromatographic techniques, such as paper chromatography,
the distinct advantages of TLC are exibility, speed, and sensitivity of the process. TLC
is generally an adsorption chromatography in which samples are separated on the basis of interactions among thin layers of adsorbent linked to the plate (Ingle et al., 2017).
⏎
204 
The different adsorbents utilized for the separation of different compounds are listed in Figure 9.2.
FIGURE 9.2 Adsorbents used for separation of different bioactive compounds in TLC
⏎

HPLC is a useful, robust, and extensively employed practice for isolating natural bioactive compounds. This method is now obtaining wide approval amidst different analytical proce­dures and has become the key option for fingerprinting, quantitative analysis, and quality control (Fan et al., 2006). Usually, natural plant foods are often isolated after evaluating moderately crude extracts in biological assays to entirely indicate the bioactive ingredients. Biologically active moieties in natural sources are usually found only as minor components in extracts and their solution of HPLC is preferably suitable for instant treating of such
multicomponent samples on both analytical as well as preparative scales. The purification/
refining of desirable constituents from natural sources by the use of HPLC is the way of separating or extracting bioactive compounds of interest from other compounds with similar structures or impurities. All compounds must exhibit a specific peak under defined chromatographic specifications. On the basis of the resultant compound of interest to be isolated, and how close the related components are, the chromatograph can pick condi­tions viz., appropriate mobile phase, flow rate, appropriate detector , and column to achieve optimal separation (Sasidharan et al., 2011).
HPLC could be combined with simple detectors applied to record chromatographic marks, proling, or quantitative reasons. Some of the detectors used with HPLC are ultra­violet detectors, ELSD (evaporative light-scattering detector), electron capture detectors or detectors for hyphenated systems that produce multidimensional information for certica­tion and online transcription, for example, MS, UV diode array (DAD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (Wolfender, 2009).
Because of the simplicity of usage and inexpensive nature, HPLC-UV is utilized by
different pharmacopeias for the purpose of quantifying specic desired bioactive compounds
 205
in the quality control of foods from natural sources, medicines, and herbal supplements. Apart from the HPLC-UV, spectral data from the HPLC-DAD (Diode-Array Detection) could be used to verify a number of chromatograms over an extensive wavelength range,
allowing qualitative as well as quantitative exploration of ngerprint chromatogram peaks
(Zhang et al., 2011). Additionally, ELSD (evaporative light scattering detector) is another detector utilized for liquid chromatography. It is mainly used to detect components with weak chromophores, for instance, aglycon or the glycosidic forms of terpenes, saponins, and a few alkaloids; however, it is commonly used along with some other techniques like MS and UV–Vis (Adnani et al., 2012).

FTIR has been shown to be an effective tool for characterizing and identifying bioactive compounds or functional units (chemical bonds) present in unknown mixtures of plant extracts. It aids in identifying as well as determining the structure of molecules. More­over, the FTIR spectrum of pure compounds is generally so distinctive that they resemble molecular “fingerprints.” Usually, for the commonly extracted compounds from plant sources, the spectra of unknown compounds can be recognized by comparing them with libraries of identified compounds (Hazra et al., 2007). FTIR has a broad range of applica­tions, from examining small particles and compounds to the assessment of cells and tissues (Berthomieu and Hienerwadel, 2009).
The preparation of FTIR samples for analysis can be done in many ways. As for a sample that is liquid in nature, the simplest way is to keep a drop of the sample among
two plates of NaCl. Apparently, the drops form a thin lm layer among the plates. Besides,
the samples that are solid in nature can be ground with potassium bromide (KBr) besides
formerly attened into ne pellets for analysis. Alternatively, solid samples can also be
mixed in a solvent for example methylene chloride, and then after a few drops of the
solution are applied onto a single HATR (high attenuated total reectivity) plate, and the
spectrum is noted as a percentage of transmittance. So the peaks formed at a particular
wave number are specied by the linkage group, and the function by reference is specied
in the manual of the Varian FTIR instrument (Ingle et al., 2017).

GC is an analytical method for separating and detecting bioactive constituents found in
product mixtures to examine the occurrence or nonoccurrence and/or quantity. For successful
characterization using GC analysis, these components must be volatile, typically have molecular weights below 1250 Da, and should be thermally stable so that these components do not decompose in the GC system. In this technique, the compounds are distributed between the gaseous and liquid phases. Usually, the flow is the gas phase; however, the liquid phase is stationary. Gas phase chromatography encompasses evaporating a sample and injecting the sample into the top of a chromatographic column. For this reason, the
206 
shipment of such samples is done through the column by nonreactive mobile phase flow. Usually column comprises a stationary phase in liquid form that is adsorbed on the exterior surface of the inert solid (Ingle et al., 2017).
GC is a commonly applied method used in various industries, such as quality control, manufacturing, chemical, and phytochemical as well as in pharmaceuticals. The four key
indicators of a successful GC approach are selectivity, efciency, sensitivity, and speed. Efciency is the capacity of a method to isolate analytes into sharp, compact bands, meaning more analytes can be separated in a single run. In other words, as efciency increases,
so does peak capacity. Selectivity is the capacity of an approach to distinguish among analytes and is largely manifest in the order in which the analytes exit the GC column. Further sensitivity is the capacity of an isolation method to identify very minute analyte
concentrations. Usually among the four indicators of the efcient GC system, efciency
and selectivity are considered to be the parameters of major interest as these indicate if the
analyte could be separated efciently or not (Shellie, 2013).

MS is an essential analytical instrument in the fields of chemistry, pharmacology, biochemistry , drugs, and various interlinked scientific fields. MS is an important analytical method to identify unknown components, quantify identified compounds, and explicate the chemical organization as well as attributes of molecules. Using MS, the molecular mass of the sample can be examined (Ingle et al., 2017). MS is used to examine combinatory archives, sequence biomolecules, and study single cells and matter from outer space. Structural interpretation of unidentified compounds, ecological as well as forensic analysis, and quality control of pharmaceuticals, foods, and polymers are all based primarily on MS. Mass spectrometers work by transforming analyte particles into a charged (ionized) state and analyzing the ions and fragmentations generated through the ionization process based
on their (m/z) (mass-to-charge) ratio (Pitt, 2009).

The GC-MS technique for the characterization of plant-based extracts is not only used
for analyzing the quantities of different bioactive substances contained in herbs/natural
sources used in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries, but it can also be an interesting tool for forensic and environmental applications (Uma et al., 2009). This technique combines two analytical procedures into one method to analyze mixtures of components. GC helps to isolate the components of a mixture, while mass spectrometry examines each component individually. Combining GC and MS (GC-MS) was realized by commercial instruments in the 1950s and has been existing since the 1970s. GC-MS is comparatively inexpensive and consistent. GC-MS systems are promptly used in different fields such as biotechnology and biochemistry research labs and are essential in numerous
 207
fields where the analysis and unambiguous identification of complex mixtures is manda­tory (Pitt, 2009).

LC-MS is usually a conventional method with the advancement of electrospray ionization (ESI) delivering a simple as well as powerful user interface. It can be utilized for an exten­sive variety of biomolecules, and the usage of parallel MS and internal stable isotope ideals permits the development of very complex and precise assays, although some methods need to be optimized to minimize ion inhibition processes (Pitt, 2009).

NMR spectroscopy is the examination of molecules by documenting the interaction of their nuclei with radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation in an effective magnetic field. NMR is generally employed for examining structural attributes. Its intrinsic sensitivity is rewarded by the provided deep structural facts (such as chirality, conformation, inclusion phenomena). There are different categories of NMR techniques, namely solid-state NMR, solution-state NMR, high-resolution magic angle spinning NMR, comprehensive multiphase NMR, hyphenated NMR, low-field NMR, and magnetic resonance imaging (Simpson et al., 2018).

9.7 CONCLUSIONS

The ongoing requirement to extract plant bioactive components from natural sources stimulates research into practical extraction techniques that will provide more yield over conventional techniques without any degradation of the biological properties of bioac­tive molecules. The emergence of the majority of nonconventional extraction procedures is largely due to advances in chromatography and environmental consciousness as less usage of solvent. However, since most of these approaches are based on diverse mecha­nisms and extraction enhancement is the result of various combined processes starting from natural material selection, pretreatments, and solvent selection to understanding every component of the nonconventional extraction process is essential. The isolation and identification of bioactive chemicals still present challenges since they are multi­component combinations found in plant material which are having different polarities and are associated with each other. During extraction, the selection of solvents based on polarity plays an important role in improving the extraction yield of bioactive molecules from natural sources. To isolate the bioactive compound(s), practically the majority of them must be purified using a variety of chromatographic techniques combined with other purification techniques that require in-depth knowledge regarding the behavior of
208 
the obtained bioactive molecule for the selection of an appropriate technique so that the biological properties of the material can be retained to the maximum for their wide food and industrial applications.

KEYWORDS

• bioactive molecules
• extraction methods
• identification
• natural sources
• quantification techniques

REFERENCES

Adeleye, O. A.; Bamiro, O. A.; Bakre, L. G.; Odeleye, F. O.; Adebowale, M. N.; Okunye, O. L.; Sodeinde,
M. A.; Adebona, A. C.; Menaa, F. Medicinal plants with potential inhibitory bioactive compounds against coronaviruses. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2022, 12, 7–16.
Adnani, N.; Michel, C. R.; Bugni, T. S. Universal quantification of structurally diverse natural products using
an evaporative light scattering detector. J. Natural Prod. 2012, 75, 802–806.
Al Khawli, F .; Pateiro, M.; Domínguez, R.; Lorenzo, J. M.; Gull´on, P.; Kousoulaki, K.; Barba, F. J. Innovative
green technologies of intensification for valorization of seafood and their by-products. Mar. Drugs. 2019, 17, 689.
Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N.; Baharlouei, A.; Watson, D. G.; Lightfoot, D. A. Phytochemicals: Extraction, isolation,
and identification of bioactive compounds from plant extracts. Plants. 2017, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants6040042
Anibogwu, R.; Jesus, K.; Pradhan, S.; Pashikanti, S.; Mateen, S.; Sharma, K. Extraction, isolation and
characterization of bioactive compounds from artemisia and their biological significance: A review. Molecules. 2021, 26(22), 6995. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226995
Antolovich, M.; Prenzler, P.; Robards, K.; Ryan, D. Sample preparation in the determination of phenolic
compounds in fruits. Analyst. 2000, 125, 989–1009.
Azmir, J.; Zaidul, I. S. M.; Rahman, M. M.; Sharif, K. M.; Mohamed, A.; Sahena, F.; Jahurul, M. H. A.;
Ghafoor, K.; Norulaini, N. A. N.; Omar, A. K. M. Techniques for extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials: A review. J. Food Eng. 2013, 117, 426–436.
Azwanida, N. N. A review on the extraction methods use in medicinal plants, principle, strength and limitation.
Med. Aromat. Plants. 2015, 4, 3.
Barbosa, J. R.; dos Santos Freitas, M. M.; da Silva Martins, L. H.; de Carvalho Junior, R. N. Polysaccharides
of mushroom pleurotus spp.: New extraction techniques, biological activities and development of new technologies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115550.
Berthomieu, C.; Hienerwadel, R. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Photosynth. Res. 2009, 101,
157–170.
Borgarello, A. V.; Mezza, G. N.; Pramparo, M. C.; Gayol, M. F. Thymol enrichment from oregano essential oil
by molecular distillation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 153, 60–6.
Brusotti, G.; Cesari, I.; Dentamaro, A.; Caccialanza, G.; Massolini, G. Isolation and characterization of
bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of analysis in the ethnopharmacological approach. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 87, 218–228.
 209
Buljeta, I.; Pichler, A.; Šimunović, J.; Kopjar, M. Beneficial effects of red wine polyphenols on human health:
Comprehensive review. Curr. Issues in Mol. Bio. 2023, 45, 782–798.
Cabral, C. E.; Klein, M. R. S. T. Phytosterols in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and prevention of
cardiovascular diseases. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017, 109(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170158
Câmara, J. S.; Albuquerque, B. R.; Aguiar, J.; Corrêa, R.; Gonçalves, J. L.; Granato, D.; Pereira, J.; Barros, L.;
Ferreira, I. Food bioactive compounds and emerging techniques for their extraction: Polyphenols as a case study. Foods. 2020, 10, 37.
Capelo-Martnez, J. L. Ultrasound in Chemistry: Analytical Applications. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ,
USA, 2009.
Castaneda-Ovando, A.; de Lourdes Pacheco-Hernandez, M.; Paez-Hernandez Ma, E.; RodriguezGalan-Vidal,
J. A.; Galan-Vidal, C. A. Review: Chemical studies of anthocyanins. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 859–871.
Chakrabarti, S.; Guha, S.; Majumder, K. Food-derived bioactive peptides in human health: Challenges and
opportunities. Nutrients. 2018, 10, 1738. doi: 10.3390/nu10111738.
Chan, C. H.; Yusoff, R.; Ngoh, G. C.; Kung, F . W. L. Microwave-assisted extractions of active ingredients from
plants. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011, 1218, 6213–6225.
Chhikara, N.; Kaur, R.; Jaglan, S.; Sharma, P.; Gat, Y.; Panghal, A. Bioactive compounds and pharmacological
and food applications of Syzygiumcumini—a review. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 6096–6115.
Choi, Y. H.; Verpoorte, R. Green solvents for the extraction of bioactive compounds from natural products
using ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 26, 87–93.
Comeskey, D. J.; Montefiori, M.; Edwards, P. J. B.; McGhie, TK. Isolation and structural identification of the
anthocyanin components of red kiwifruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57(5), 2035–2039.
Cox-Georgian, D.; Ramadoss, N.; Dona, C.; Basu, C. Therapeutic and medicinal uses of terpenes. Med. Plants.
2019, 12, 333–59.
Cui, Y.; Shen, N.; Yuan, X.; Dang, J.; Shao, Y.; Mei, L.; Tao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Z. Two dimensional
chromatography based on on-line HPLC-DPPH bioactivity guided assay for the preparative isolation of analogue antioxidant compound from Arenariakansuensis. J. Chromatogr. B. 2017, 1046, 81–86.
Da Porto, C.; Decorti, D.; Natolino, A. Water and ethanol as co-solvent in supercritical fluid extraction of
proanthocyanidins from grape marc: A comparison and a proposal. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2014, 87, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2013.12.019
Da Silva, R. P.; Rocha-Santos, T. A.; Duarte, A. C. Supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive compounds. TrAC
trend. Anal. Chem. 2015, 1(76), 40–51.
Dai, Y.; van Spronsen, J.; Witkamp, G. J.; Verpoorte, R.; Choi, Y. H. Natural deep eutectic solvents as new
potential media for green technology. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2013, 766, 61–68.
Dinarvand, M.; Spain, M. Identification of bioactive compounds from marine natural products and exploration
of Structure-Activity Relationships (SAR). Antibiotics. 2021, 10, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics 10030337
Doria, E.; Buonocore, D.; Marra, A.; Bonta, V.; Gazzola, A.; Dossena, M.; Verri, M.; Calvio, C. Bacterial-assisted
extraction of bioactive compounds from cauliflower. Plants. 2022, 11(6), 816.
Fan, X. H.; Cheng, Y. Y.; Ye, Z. L.; Lin, R. C.; Qian, Z. Z. Multiple chromatographic fingerprinting and its
application to the quality control of herbal medicines. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2006, 555, 217–224.
Gao, M.; Wang, X. L.; Gu, M.; Su, Z. G.; Wang, Y.; Janson, J. C. Separation of polyphenols using porous
polyamide resin and assessment of mechanism of retention. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34(15), 1853–8.
Grassino, A. N.; Jezek, D.; Karlovic, S.; Bosiljkov, T. Application of high hydrostatic pressure for pectin
extraction from agrofood waste and by-products. Adv. Chem. Eng. 2017, 1–16.
Hafizah, C.; Noh, C. H.; Bt. F.; Azmin, N. F. B. M.; Asnawi, A. L. A Review: Fourier Transform Infrared
(FTIR) Application on Bioactive Compounds. Conference: 4th International Conference on Biotechnology Engineering (ICBioE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2016.
Hamid.; Thakur, N. S.; Thakur, A.; Kumar, P. Effect of different drying modes on phenolics and antioxidant
potential of different parts of wild pomegranate fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2020a, 274, 109656. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109656
Hamid.; Thakur, N. S.; Thakur, A. Microencapsulation of wild pomegranate flavedophenolics by lyophilization:
Effect of maltodextrin concentration, structural morphology, functional properties, elemental composition
210 
and ingredient for development of functional beverage. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020b, 133.https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110077.
Hamid.; Thakur, N. S.; Sharma, R.; Sharma, Y. P.; Gupta, R. K.; Rana, N.; Thakur, A. Phenolics from
underutilized wild pomegranate fruit flavedo: Extraction, quantification, hierarchical clustering, antibacterial properties, HPLC, SEM analysis and FT-IR characterization. South Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 145, 1–10. 10.1016/j. sajb.2022.01.025
Handa, S. S.; Khanuja, S. P. S.; Longo, G.; Rakesh, D. D. Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic
Plants, (1stedn), no. 66. United Nations Industrial Development Organization and the International Centre for Science and High Technology: Italy. 2008.
Hazra, K. M.; Roy, R. N.; Sen, S. K.; Laskar , S. Isolation of antibacterial pentahydroxy flavones from the seeds
of Mimusopselengi Linn. Afr. J. Biotech. 2007, 6, 1446–1449.
Heinz, V.; Toepfl, S.; Knorr, D. Impact of temperature on lethality and energy efficiency of apple juice
pasteurization by pulsed electric fields treatment. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2003, 4, 167–175.
Herrero, M.; Castro-Puyana, M.; Mendiola, J. A.; Ibanez, E. Compressed fluids for the extraction of bioactive
compounds. TrAC Trend. Anal. Chem. 2013, 43, 67–83.
Hiranvarachat, B.; Devahastin, S.; Chiewchan, N.; Raghavan, G. V. Structural modification by different
pretreatment methods to enhance microwave-assisted extraction of β-carotene from carrots. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115(2), 190–197.
Hussain, M. K.; Saquib, M.; Khan, M. F . Techniques for extraction, isolation, and standardization of bio-active
compounds from medicinal plants. In: Natural Bio-active Compounds, Swamy, M. K.; Akhtar, M. S. Volume 2: Chemistry, Pharmacology and Health Care Practices. 2019. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Ingle, K. P .; Deshmukh, A. G.; Padole, D. A.; Dudhare, M. S.; Moharil, M. P.; Khelurkar, V. C. Phytochemicals:
Extraction methods, identification and detection of bioactive compounds from plant extracts. J. Pharm.
Phytochem. 2017, 6, 32–36. Jaime, L.; Santoyo, S. The health benefits of the bioactive compounds in foods. Foods. 2021, 10, 325. Jayalakshmi, B.; Raveesha, K. A.; Amruthesh, K. N. Isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds
from Euphorbia cotinifolia. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 1–9. Jha, A. K.; Sit, N. Extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials using combination of various novel
methods: A review. Trend. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 579–591. Kaderides, K.; Papaoikonomou, L.; Serafim, M.; Goula, A. M. Microwave-assisted extraction of phenolics
from pomegranate peels: Optimization, kinetics, and comparison with ultrasounds extraction. Chem. Eng.
Process.–Process Intensification. 2019, 137, 1–11. Kalhor, P.; Ghandi, K. Deep eutectic solvents for pretreatment, extraction, and catalysis of biomass and food
waste. Molecules. 2019, 24, 4012. Kamiloglu, S.; Tomas, M.; Ozdal, T.; Yolci-Omeroglu, P.; Capanoglu, E. Bioactive component analysis. In:
Innovative Food Analysis. Elsevier. 2021, pp. 41–65. Karthikeyan, A.; Joseph, A.; Nair, B. G. Promising bioactive compounds from the marine environment and
their potential effects on various diseases. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2022, 20, 14. Kaufmann, B.; Christen, P. Recent extraction techniques for natural products: Microwave-assisted extraction
and pressurized solvent extraction. Phytochem. Anal. 2002, Khemakhem, I.; Gargouri, O. D.; Dhouib, A.; Ayadi. M. A.; Bouaziz, M. Oleuropein rich extract from olive
leaves by combining microfiltration, ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. T echnol. 2017, 172, 310–7. Kim, S.; Lim, S. W.; Choi, J. Drug discovery inspired by bioactive small molecules from nature. Anim. Cells
Syst. (Seoul). 2022, 26, 254–265. Latif, S.; Anwar, F. Effect of aqueous enzymatic processes on sunflower oil quality. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.
2009, 86, 393–400. Lebovka, N. I.; Bazhal, M. I.; Vorobiev, E. Estimation of characteristic damage time of food materials in
pulsed-electric fields. J. Food Eng. 2002, 54, 337–346. Lee, N. Y.; Y unus, M. A. C.; Idham, Z.; Ruslan, M. S. H.; Aziz, A. H. A.; Irwansyah, N. Extraction and identification
of bioactive compounds from agarwood leaves. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater . Sci. Eng. 2017, 162(1), 012028. Lee, S. H.; Lee, J.; Herald, T .; Cox, S.; Noronha, L.; Perumal, R.; Lee, H.-S.; Smolensky, D. Anticancer activity
of a novel high phenolic sorghum bran in human colon cancer cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020,
2890536.
13, 105–113.
 211
Li, J.; Cheong, K.; Zhao, J.; Hu, D.; Chen, X.; Qiao, C.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, S. Preparation of inulin-type
fructooligosaccharides using fast protein liquid chromatography coupled with refractive index detection. J.
Chromatogr. A. 2013, 1308, 52–57. Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Ma, R.; Zhang, X. Separation of tea polyphenol from green tea leaves by a combined
CATUFM-adsorption resin process. J. Food Eng. 2005, 67, 253–260. Linton, M.; McClements, J. M. J.; Patterson, M. F . Inactivation of pathogenic escherichia coli in skimmed milk
using high hydrostatic pressure. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2001, 2, 99–104. Liu, J. J.; Gasmalla, M. A. A.; Li, P.; Yang, R. Enzyme-assisted extraction processing from oilseeds: Principle,
processing and application. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 35, 184–193. Luthria, D. L. Significance of sample preparation in developing analytical methodologies for accurate estimation
of bioactive compounds in functional foods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86(14), 2266–2272. https://doi.org/
10.1002/jsfa.2666
Lvanovic, M.; IslamcevicRazborsek, M.; Kolar, M. Innovative extraction techniques using deep eutectic
solvents and analytical methods for the isolation and characterization of natural bioactive compounds from
plant material. Plants. 2020, 9(11), 1428.https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111428 Mason, T . J.; Paniwnyk, L.; Lorimer , J. P. The uses of ultrasound in food technology. Ultrason. Sonochem. 1996,
3, S253–S260. Mbous, Y. P.; Hayyan, M.; Hayyan, A.; Wong, W. F.; Hashim, M. A.; Looi, C. Y. Applications of deep eutectic
solvents in biotechnology and bioengineering—promises and challenges. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 105–134. McClements, D. J. Ultrasonic characterization of foods and drinks: Principles, methods, and applications. Crit.
Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1997, 37, 1–46. Meng, F. C.; Wu, Q. S.; Wang, R.; Li, S. P.; Lin, L. G.; Zhang, Q. W.; Chen, P. A novel strategy for quantitative
analysis of major ginsenosides in Panacis japonica Rhizoma with a standardized reference fraction. Molecules.
2017, 22(12), 2067. Michalkiewicz, A.; Biesaga, M.; Pyrzynska, K. Solid-phase extraction procedure for determination of phenolic
acids and some flavonols in honey. J. Chr omatogr. A. 2008, 1187, 18–24. Monciardini, P.; Iorio. M.; Maffioli. S.; Sosio, M.; Donadio, S. Discovering new bioactive molecules from
microbial sources. Microb. Biotechnol. 2014, 7, 209–20. Nieto, A.; Borrull, F.; Pocurull, E.; Marcé, R. M. Pressurized liquid extraction: A useful technique to extract
pharmaceuticals and personal-care products from sewage sludge. TrAC T rend. Anal. Chem. 2010, 29(7), 752–764. Omeroglu, P. Y.; Acoglu, B.; Ozdal, T.; Tamer, C. E.; Çopur, O. U. Extraction techniques for plant-based
bio-active compounds. In: Swamy, M., Akhtar, M. (Eds.) Natural Bio-active Compounds. Mallappa,
Springer, Springer Nature Singapore. 2019. Pai, S.; Hebbar, A.; Selvaraj, S. A critical look at challenges and future scopes of bioactive compounds and their
incorporations in the food, energy , and pharmaceutical sector. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 35518–35541. Pandey, K. B.; Rizvi, S. I. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxid. Med.
Cell Longev. 2009, 5, 270–278. Panja, P. Green extraction methods of food polyphenols from vegetable materials. Curr. Opin. Food Sci.
23, 173–182 Patil, B. S.; Jayaprakasha, G. K.; ChidambaraMurthy, K. N.; Vikram, A. Bioactive compounds: Historical
perspectives, opportunities, and challenges. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8142–8160. Patra, A.; Abdullah, S.; Pradhan, R. C. Review on the extraction of bioactive compounds and characterization of
fruit industry by-products. Bioresour. Bioproc. 2022, 9(1), 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00498-3 Pitt, J. J. Principles and applications of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in clinical biochemistry.
Clin. Biochemist. Rev. 2009, 30, 19–34. Plaza, M.; Santoyo, S.; Jaime, L.; Reina, G. G. B.; Herrero, M.; Senorans, F. J.; Ibanez, E. Screening for
bioactive compounds from algae. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51(2), 450–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jpba.2009.03.016 Pongmalai, P.; Devahastin, S.; Chiewchan, N.; Soponronnarit, S. Enhancement of microwave-assisted
extraction of bioactive compounds from cabbage outer leaves via the application of ultrasonic pretreatment.
Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 15(144), 37–45. Rassem, H. A.; Nour, A. H.; Yunus, M. R. Techniques for extraction of essential oils from plants: A review.
Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2016, 10, 117–127
2018,
212 
Richter, B. E.; Jones, B. A.; Ezzell, J. L.; Porter, N. L.; Avdalovic, N.; Pohl, C. Accelerated solvent extraction:
A technology for sample preparation. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1033–1039. Rodríguez-Meizoso, I.; Jaime, L.; Santoyo, S.; Senorans, F. J.; Cifuentes, A.; Ibanez, E. Subcritical water
extraction and characterization of bioactive compounds from haematococcus pluvialis microalga. J. Pharm.
Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51(2), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2009.03.014 Rostagno, M. A.; Palma, M.; Barroso, C. G. Solid-phase extraction of soy isoflavones. J. Chr omatogr. A. 2005,
1076, 110–117. Rowles, J. L.; Erdman, J. W. Carotenoids and their role in cancer prevention. Biochim. Biophys Acta Mol. Cell
Biol. Lipids. 2020, 1865, 158613. Samtiya, M.; Aluko, R. E.; Dhewa, T.; Moreno-Rojas, J. M. Potential health benefits of plant food-derived
bioactive components: An overview. Foods. 2021, 10, 839. Santos, D. I.; Saraiva, J. M. A.; V icente, A. A.; Moldão-Martins, M. Methods for determining bioavailability and
bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds and nutrients. In: Innovative Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing,
Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Nutrients and Bioactive Compounds. Elsevier. 2019, pp. 23–54. Sasidharan, S.; Chen, Y.; Saravanan, D.; Sundram, K. M.; Yoga Latha, L. Extraction, isolation and characterization
of bioactive compounds from plants’ extracts. Afr. J. Trad. Compl. Alt. Med. 2011, 8, 1–10. Saucedo-Pompa, S.; Torres-Castillo, J. A.; Castro-Lopez, C.; Rojas, R.; Sanchez-Alejo, E. J.; Ngangyo-Heya,
M.; Martinez-Avila, G. C. G. Moringa plants: Bioactive compounds and promising applications in food
products. Food Res. Int. 2018, 111, 438–450. Scordino, M.; Di Muaro, A.; Passerini, A.; Maccarone, E. Adsorption of flavonoids on resins: cyanidin
3-glucoside. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1965–1972. See, T. Y.; Tee, S. I.; Ang, T. N.; Chan, C. H.; Yusoff, R.; Ngoh, G. C. Assessment of various pretreatment
and extraction methods for the extraction of bioactive compounds from orthosiphon stamineus leaf via
microstructures analysis. Int. J. Food Eng. 2016, 12(7), 711–717. Segneanu, A.; Velciov, S. M.; Olariu, S.; Cziple, F.; Damian, D.; Grozescu, I. Bioactive molecules profile from
natural compounds. In: Asao, T.; Asaduzzaman, M. (Eds.), Amino Acid—New Insights and Roles in Plant and
Animal. InTech. 2017. Shellie, R. A. Gas chromatography. Encyclopedia Forensic Sci. 2013, 579–585. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-
382165-2.00245-2. Shorstkii, I.; Khudyakov, D.; Mirshekarloo, M. S. Pulsed electric field assisted sunflower oil pilot production:
Impact on oil yield, extraction kinetics and chemical parameters. Innov . Food Sci. Emer g. Technol. 2020, 60,
102309.
Sila, A.; Bougatef, A. Antioxidant peptides from marine by-products: Isolation, identification and application
in food systems. A review. J. Funct. Foods. 2016, 21, 10–26. Silva, E. M.; Pompeu, D. R.; Larondelle, Y.; Rogez, H. Optimisation of the adsorption of polyphenols from
Inga edulis leaves on macroporous resins using an experimental design methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol.
2007, 53, 274–280. Simpson, A. J.; Simpson, M. J.; Soong, R. Environmental nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: An
overview and a primer. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90(1), 628–639. Socas-Rodriguez, B.; Torres-Cornejo, M. V.; Alvarez-Rivera, G.; Mendiola, J. A. Deep eutectic solvents for
the extraction of bioactive compounds from natural sources and agricultural by-products. Appl. Sci.
11(11), 4897. Soxhlet, F . Die gewichts analytische Bestimmung des Milchfettes. Dingler’ s Polytechnisches J. 1879, 232, 461–465. Story, E. N.; Kopec, R. E.; Schwartz, S. J.; Harris, G. K. An update on the health effects of tomato lycopene.
Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 1, 189–210. Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Sujarit, K.; Pattananandecha, T.; Saenjum, C.; Lumyong, S. Natural bioactive
compounds from fungi as potential candidates for protease inhibitors and immunomodulators to apply for
coronaviruses. Molecules. 2020, 25, 1800. Sytar, O.; Smetanska, I. Special issue “Bioactive compounds from natural sources (2020, 2021)”. Molecules.
2022, 27, 1929. Tan, T.; Su, Z. G.; Gu, M.; Xu, J.; Janson, J. C. Cross-linked agarose for separation of low molecular weight
natural products in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5(5), 505–510. Tiwari, B. K. Ultrasound: A clean, green extraction technology. Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 71, 100–109.
2021,