Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword I
- •Foreword II
- •Foreword III
- •Foreword IV
- •Contributors
- •Manuscripts Translation and Preparation
- •1.1 Introduction
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •Deputy Editors
- •1.2.2.2 Gallbladder
- •1.2.2.3 Cystic Duct
- •1.2.2.4 Common Bile Duct
- •Supraduodenal Portion
- •Retroduodenal Portion
- •Pancreatic Portion
- •Intraduodenal Portion
- •1.3.2 Data Acquisition
- •1.3.2.2 Bile Duct Perfusion
- •1.3.2.3 Hepatic Artery Perfusion
- •1.3.2.4 Specimen Perfusion Fixation
- •1.4.1 Liver Dissection after Biliary Tract Perfusion
- •1.4.3.1 Image Registration After Bile Duct Perfusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Basic Principles
- •2.2.2.1 Methods
- •Preparation
- •Scanning Modalities
- •Contrast-Enhanced Scanning
- •Contrast-Enhanced Examination
- •Shaded Surface Display
- •Maximum Intensity Projection
- •Volume Rendering
- •2.3.1.1 MRI Devices
- •The Magnet
- •The Gradient System
- •The Radiofrequency System
- •Radiofrequency Coils
- •The Computer System
- •Other Auxiliary Equipment
- •2.3.2.1 MRI Preparations
- •Patient Preparation
- •2.3.2.2 Regular Scan Sequences
- •Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo Coronal Sequences
- •2D or 3D T2W1
- •Transaxial Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo Fat Suppression Sequences
- •Dynamic Enhancement Sequence
- •3D Volumetric Acquisitions
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •2D Continuous Thin-Slice Scanning
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •2D Thick-Slice Projection Imaging
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Congenital Biliary Diseases
- •3.2.1 Congenital Extrahepatic Biliary Atresia
- •3.2.1.1 CT Features
- •3.2.1.2 MRI Features
- •3.2.2 Biliary Dilatation
- •Type I
- •Type II
- •Type III
- •Type IV
- •Type V
- •3.2.2.2 Radiographic Features
- •CT Features
- •MRI Features
- •3.2.3 Bile Duct Hamartomas
- •3.2.3.1 CT Features
- •3.2.3.2 MRI Features
- •3.3 Common Gallbladder Diseases
- •3.3.1 Acute Cholecystitis
- •3.3.1.1 Radiographic Features
- •CT Features
- •MRI Features
- •Gangrenous Cholecystitis
- •Emphysematous Cholecystitis
- •Pediatric Cholecystitis
- •Pregnancy Cholecystitis
- •Gallbladder Empyema
- •Gallbladder Perforation
- •Hemorrhagic Cholecystitis
- •3.3.5 Other Gallbladder Tumors
- •3.3.5.3 Primary Gallbladder Lymphoma
- •3.3.5.4 Gallbladder Fibrosarcoma
- •3.3.6 Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis
- •3.3.6.1 CT Features
- •3.3.6.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.7 Gallbladder Adenomyomatosis
- •3.3.2 Chronic Cholecystitis
- •3.3.2.1 CT Features
- •3.3.2.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.3 Gallstones
- •3.3.3.1 CT Features
- •3.3.3.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.4 Gallbladder Cancer
- •3.3.4.1 CT Features
- •3.3.4.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.4.3 MRCP Features
- •3.3.7.1 CT Features
- •3.3.7.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.8.1 CT Features
- •3.3.9 Gallbladder Torsion
- •3.3.9.1 Type I
- •3.3.9.2 Type II
- •3.3.10.2 Gallbladder Sludge
- •3.3.11 Mirizzi’s Syndrome
- •3.3.11.1 CT Features
- •3.3.11.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.12 Post-Cholecystectomy Syndrome
- •3.4.1 Bile Duct Stones
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •3.4.2 Suppurative Cholangitis/Acute Cholangitis
- •3.4.3 Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
- •3.4.3.1 CT Findings
- •3.4.3.2 MRI Findings
- •3.4.4 Secondary Sclerotic Cholangitis
- •3.4.5 Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis
- •3.4.5.1 CT Findings
- •3.4.6 Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.6.1 CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •MRCP Features
- •3.4.7 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.7.3 Special Manifestations
- •3.4.8 Periampullary Carcinoma
- •3.4.8.1 Radiographic Findings
- •3.4.8.2 CT Findings
- •3.4.8.3 MRI Findings
- •3.4.9 Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.9.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.9.2 MRI Findings
- •3.5.1.1 Intrahepatic Biliary Dilatation
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •3.5.1.2 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Dilatation
- •3.5.2.1 Hilar Obstruction
- •3.5.2.3 Pancreatic Obstruction
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.2.1 CT Acquisition Protocols
- •4.1.2.2 Data Preprocessing
- •4.1.2.3 Medical Image Segmentation
- •4.1.2.4 3D Visualization
- •4.2.1 Image Registration
- •4.2.1.1 Template Matching Algorithm
- •4.2.1.2 Registration Steps
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •4.2.2 Image Segmentation
- •Pixel Based Methods
- •Region Based Methods
- •Edge Based Methods
- •Model Based Methods
- •4.2.2.3 Serialized Segmentation Model
- •4.2.2.4 Adaptive Region Growing Algorithm
- •4.2.3 3D Reconstruction
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •Fused Deposition Modeling
- •Stereolithography
- •Selected Laser Sintering
- •Direct Metal Laser Sintering
- •Laminated Object Manufacturing
- •Electron Beam Melting
- •Three-Dimensional Printing
- •High-Performance 3D Reconstruction Software
- •5.1.2.2 Medical Model Manufacturing
- •5.1.2.3 Tissue/Organ Regeneration
- •5.2.2 Digital Preparation
- •5.3.1.1 In Complex Liver Resection
- •5.3.1.2 In Liver Transplantation
- •5.3.2.1 In Cholangiocarcinoma Surgery
- •5.3.4 Prospects
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.1.1 Virtual Anatomy
- •6.1.2 Surgical Simulation
- •Improved Doctor–Patient Relationship
- •Reduced Surgical Costs
- •Remote Intervention
- •6.2 Virtual Surgical Instruments
- •6.2.1 Geometric Modeling
- •6.2.2 Motion Modeling
- •6.2.3 Physical Modeling
- •6.3 Surgical Simulation
- •6.3.1 The Hardware System
- •6.3.2 Software System
- •6.3.2.1 FreeForm Modeling System
- •6.3.2.2 Open Graphics Library
- •6.3.2.3 Tactile Development Kit
- •6.4.4 Discussion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Duodenoscopy
- •8.3 Choledochoscopy
- •8.3.1 Preoperative Application
- •8.3.2 Intraoperative Application
- •8.3.3 Postoperative Application
- •8.4 Capsule Endoscopy
- •8.5 Laparoscope
- •8.6 Endoscopic Ultrasound
- •8.7 3D Visualization-Assisted Endoscopic Technology
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.3.1.1 Arterial Phase
- •9.3.1.2 Portal Venous Phase
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1.2 Image Segmentation
- •10.2.1.3 3D Reconstruction
- •10.2.1.4 Surgical Simulation
- •Surgical Procedure
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.2 Image Registration
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1 Imaging
- •12.2.2 Other Auxiliary Examinations
- •12.2.2.1 Biliary Manometry
- •12.2.2.2 Cholescintigraphy
- •12.2.2.3 Selective Celiac Arteriography
- •12.3.1 Collection Equipment
- •12.3.3 Plain Scan
- •12.3.4 Dynamic Enhanced CT Scan
- •12.4.1 Image Registration
- •12.6.1 Semiautomatic Liver Segmentation
- •Surgical Procedures
- •Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.2 Anatomical or Regular Hepatectomy Guided by 3D Visualization
- •12.10.2.1 Indications
- •12.10.2.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.2.4 Surgical Procedures
- •For Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy
- •For Anatomical Left Hemihepatectomy
- •12.10.3.1 Contraindication
- •12.10.3.3 Surgical Procedures
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •12.10.4.1 Indications
- •12.10.4.2 Contraindication
- •12.10.4.4 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.4.5 Attention
- •12.10.5.1 Indications
- •12.10.5.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.5.3 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.5.4 Attention
- •12.10.6.1 Indications
- •12.10.6.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.6.3 Preoperative Imaging Evaluation
- •12.10.6.4 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.6.5 Attention
- •12.10.7.1 Indications
- •12.10.7.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.7.3 Surgical procedures
- •12.10.7.4 Attention
- •12.10.8.1 Preoperative Evaluation
- •12.10.8.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •12.10.8.3 Contraindications
- •12.10.8.4 Operation Methods
- •12.10.8.5 Attention
- •12.10.9.1 Biliary Injury
- •Causes
- •Preventive Measures
- •12.10.9.2 Biliary Bleeding
- •12.10.9.3 Gastrointestinal Water Retention
- •Reasons
- •12.10.9.4 Biliary Leakage
- •12.11.1.1 Reasons
- •Main Reasons
- •Iatrogenic Biliary Tract Injury
- •Other Reasons
- •12.11.1.3 Surgical Procedures
- •Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy
- •Hepatectomy
- •Intrahepatic Lithotripsy Through Sinus Tract or PTCS
- •Severe Symptomatic Patients
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.3.1 Ultrasonography
- •13.3.2 Multi-Slice CT
- •13.3.5 Intraoperative Cholangiography
- •13.3.6 Radionuclide Hepatobiliary Scan
- •13.3.7 Digital Medicine Technology
- •Periampullary Tumor
- •Biliary Atresia
- •Acute Pancreatitis
- •Acute Cholecystitis
- •Hepatic Cyst
- •Hepatic Echinococcosis
- •Retroperitoneal Cystic Masses
- •13.4.2.1 Biliary Drainage
- •13.4.2.3 Liver Resection
- •13.4.2.4 Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- •13.4.2.5 Liver Transplantation
- •13.4.2.6 Laparoscopic Surgery
- •13.4.2.7 Reoperation
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1.1 Etiology
- •Anatomical Factors
- •Pathological Factors
- •Surgeon Factors
- •14.1.2.2 End-to-End Cholangiostomy
- •14.1.2.3 Choledochoduodenostomy
- •14.1.2.4 Roux-en-Y Cholangiojejunostomy
- •14.1.2.7 Liver Transplantation
- •14.2.2.1 Patient Information
- •14.2.2.2 Diagnosis
- •14.2.2.3 Complaint
- •14.2.2.4 History
- •14.2.2.5 Signs
- •14.2.2.6 Previous History
- •14.2.2.7 Laboratory Examination
- •Blood Routine
- •Coagulation Function
- •Liver Function
- •Renal Function
- •Tumor Markers
- •14.2.2.8 General Condition Assessment
- •Nutritional Status Evaluation
- •Liver Function Evaluation
- •Important Organ Function Evaluation
- •14.2.2.9 Imaging Evaluation
- •Evaluation by 3D Visualization
- •14.2.2.10 Surgical Planning
- •14.2.2.11 Surgical Procedures
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •14.2.3.1 Patient Information
- •14.2.3.2 Diagnosis
- •14.2.3.3 Complaint
- •14.2.3.4 History
- •14.2.3.5 Signs
- •14.2.3.6 Previous History
- •14.2.3.7 Laboratory Examination
- •Blood Routine
- •Coagulation Function
- •Liver Function
- •Renal Function
- •Tumor Markers
- •14.2.3.8 General Condition Assessment
- •Nutritional Status Evaluation
- •Liver Function Evaluation
- •Important Organ Function Evaluation
- •14.2.3.9 Imaging Evaluation
- •Evaluation by 3D Visualization
- •14.2.3.10 Surgical Planning
- •14.2.3.11 Surgical Procedure
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Clinical Stages
- •15.2.2 Surgical Strategy
- •Tis/T1a Stage
- •T1b Stage
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.2.2.2 Lymph Node Dissection Range
- •Stage Tis/T1a
- •Stage T1b
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.2.2.3 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Management
- •Stage Tis/T1a
- •Stage T1b
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.3.1 T Staging Assessment
- •15.3.1.1 Stage T2
- •MDCT
- •15.3.1.2 Stage T3
- •MDCT
- •15.3.1.3 Stage T4
- •15.3.3 Resectability Assessment
- •15.3.3.1 General Assessment
- •15.3.3.2 Liver Function Assessment
- •15.3.3.3 Virtual Surgery Assessment
- •15.4.1 Surgical Indications
- •15.4.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •15.4.2.3 Preoperative 3D Visualization Evaluation
- •15.4.3 Surgical Procedures
- •15.4.3.1 Resection Range
- •Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- •15.4.4 Surgical Prognosis
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.2.2 Imaging Diagnosis
- •16.2.2.3 Pathological Diagnosis
- •16.2.2.4 Clinical Staging
- •16.2.3.1 Preoperative Assessment
- •Liver Function Assessment
- •Resectability Assessment
- •3D Visualization Assessment
- •16.2.3.2 Surgical Approach
- •16.2.3.3 Controversial Point
- •Lymphadenectomy
- •Extended Hepatectomy
- •Liver Transplantation
- •Operative Prognosis
- •16.2.4 Multidisciplinary Team
- •16.2.5 Conclusion
- •Notes
- •16.3.4 Surgical Planning Guided by 3D Visualization
- •Type I
- •Type II
- •Type IIIa
- •Type IIIb
- •Type IVa
- •Type IVb
- •Type V
- •16.3.6.2 Typical Case
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •Case 5
- •16.3.6.4 Lymphadenectomy
- •16.3.6.6 Laparoscopic Exploration
- •16.3.6.7 Intraoperative Frozen Section Consultation
- •16.3.6.8 Liver Transplantation
- •Common Type
- •Type II Variation
- •Type III Variation
- •16.3.10 Other Comprehensive Treatment
- •16.3.11 Other Perioperative Management
- •16.3.11.2 Postoperative Follow-Up
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2.2.1 Perihilar Tumor
- •17.2.2.2 High Biliary Stricture
- •Hepatic Arterial Variation
- •Portal Vein Variations
- •Bile Duct Variations
- •17.3.2 Complex Pathophysiology
- •17.4.1.3 Preoperative Biliary Drainage
- •17.4.2.3 Cholangiojejunostomy
- •17.6 3D Visualization Imaging
- •Viscera Reconstruction
- •Lesion Reconstruction
- •Vascular Reconstruction
- •References

448
J. Wang et al.
17.6.2.3 3D Reconstruction ofLiver andBlood
Vessels
3D visualization software was used to reconstruct the
enhanced CT data of upper abdomen, including reconstruction of liver, blood vessels, and lesion.
Viscera Reconstruction
The 3D reconstruction of liver contour was carried out by
methods such as the semiautomatic region growth method
(Dreizin etal. 2016). Firstly, the liver was automatically recognized and reconstructed by a computer, and then the
boundary of liver model was manually adjusted based on
two-dimensional image examination to establish a 3D model
of liver as realistic as possible (Fig.17.37).
Lesion Reconstruction
For calculi, according to their density characteristics in the
plain scanning phase of enhanced CT, the contour was segmented in the coronal plane, sagittal plane, and horizontal
plane to generate a preliminary three-dimensional structure;
and then the contour was ne-tuned in the two-dimensional
plane (Fig.17.38). For perihepatic hilar tumors, besides 3D
reconstruction and adjustment of contours based on the difference of venous density in enhanced CT; the range of
tumor inltration can also be judged according to the indirect
signs of bile duct expansion and “truncation.”
Vascular Reconstruction
Three-dimensional reconstruction of hepatic artery, portal
vein, hepatic vein, and dilated bile duct was performed by
the threshold segmentation method (Fig.17.39).
Synthesis andRotation
Compared with traditional imaging methods, 3D visualization can not only synthesize the planar images of the coronal
plane, sagittal plane, and horizontal plane into threedimensional structures, but also display the hepatic artery,
portal vein, hepatic vein, and lesions respectively or simultaneously. Three-dimensional visualization technology has the
functions of rotation, segmentation, reduction, amplication,
etc., which can display the spatial relationship of the hepatic
vascular vessels and the positional relationship between the
lesion and the surrounding vascular vessels stereoscopically
and intuitively, as well as simulate the operation.
Fig. 17.37 Manually modify the boundary of the liver model

17 Application of3D Visualization Technology inPerihilar Surgery
Fig. 17.38 Reconstruction and ne-tuning of the 3D structure of the lesion
449
Fig. 17.39 3D reconstruction of hepatic arteries, veins, and bile ducts

450
J. Wang et al.
Liver Segmentation andLiver Volume Calculation
The liver can be divided into eight functionally independent
segments based on Couinaud classication using; however,
this method has certain limitations. Couinaud’s liver segment classication is suitable for hepatic segments with normal portal vein course. If there are variations in the portal
vein, it is necessary to adjust the plane of a segment according
to the distribution and course of portal vein branches
(Fig.17.40).
Simulation surgery can also be performed to simulate partial hepatectomy and measure the residual liver volume
(Fig.17.41).
ab c
de f
Fig. 17.40 Steps for 3D visualization of liver segmentation. (a)
Segmentation of the left and right liver; (b) Segmentation of the right
anterior lobe and the right posterior lobe; (c) Segmentation of the seg-
Fig. 17.41 Simulation of right hepatectomy and its effects by re-specifying the cutting plane
ment V and VII, VI and VII; (d) Segmentation of the left inner lobe and
left outer lobe; (e) Segmentation of the segments II and III; (f)
Segmentation of the segments I and IV

17 Application of3D Visualization Technology inPerihilar Surgery
451
17.6.3 Distortion ofLesion Information
During 3D Visualization Processing
3D visualization technology refers to the automatic recognition/articial segmentation of the region of interest (ROI)
based on the source data of enhanced CT.Although the rendered 3D images show the lesions, hepatic vessels, and their
spatial relationships more intuitively, compared with CT
source data, the process of 3D visualization loses delity.
The evaluation results will vary according to the level and
experience of the operator in reading the original CT lm.
Because hepatocellular carcinoma has a clear envelope
and a clear boundary, the articial segmentation of the tumor
is relatively simple and accurate; while hilar cholangiocarcinoma has no envelope, so the tumor boundary is often
unclear, and the precise delineation of the lesion is difcult.
This may easily cause secondary errors and reduce the accuracy of assessment.
The segmentation of liver segments by 3D visualization
technology is based on the course of hepatic vein and portal
vein, while the selection of segmentation plane cannot be
very accurate, especially when there are variations in the
course of these veins. Thus, there are errors in the accurate
division of liver segments.
References
Al Mahjoub A, Menahem B, Fohlen A, etal. Preoperative biliary drain-
age in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: is
percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage safer and more effective
than endoscopic biliary drainage? A meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv
Radiol. 2017;28(4):576–82.
Ali MA, Chuang JF, Yong CC, et al. Extended central hepatec-
tomy with preservation of segment 6 for patients with centrally
located hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int.
2015;14(1):63–8.
Atri M, Bret PM, Fraser-Hill MA.Intrahepatic portal venous variations:
prevalence with US.Radiology. 1992;184(1):157–8.
Belghiti J, Ogata S. Preoperative optimization of the liver for resec-
tion in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford).
2005;7(4):252–3.
Biliary Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical
Association. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hilar chol-
angiocarcinoma (2013 Edition). Chin J Surg. 2013a;51(10):865–71.
Biliary Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical
Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of bile duct
injury (2013 Edition). Chin J Digest Surg. 2013b;12(2):81–95.
Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomo-
sis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1975;140(2):170–8.
Bismuth H, Majno PE. Biliary strictures: classication based on the
principles of surgical treatment. World J Surg. 2001;25(10):1241–4.
Chaib E, Kanas AF, Galvao FH, etal. Bile duct conuence: anatomic
variations and its classication. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(2):105–9.
Chedid MF, Capaverde LH, Pretto GG, etal. Replaced right hepatic
artery originated from the proximal segment of the common
hepatic artery and crossing behind the portal vein: a dangerous
anomaly in hepatic resection and liver transplantation. Am Surg.
2012;78(12):E501–3.
Chen W, Ke K, Chen YL.Combined portal vein resection in the treat-
ment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(5):489–95.
Cho A, Okazumi S, Yoshinaga Y, etal. Relationship between left biliary
duct system and left portal vein: evaluation with three-dimensional
portocholangiography. Radiology. 2003;228(1):246–50.
da Fonseca-Neto OC, de Albuquerque-Neto MC, de Miranda
AL.Surgical management of cystic dilatation bile ducts in adults.
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28(1):17–9.
Dong J-h, Zheng S-s, Xiao-ping C.Consensus on evaluation of Hepatic
functional reserve before hepatectomy (2011 edition). Chin J Digest
Surg. 2011;10(1):20–5.
Dong J, Yang S, Zeng J, etal. Precision in liver surgery. Semin Liver
Dis. 2013a;33(3):189–203.
Dong J-H, Zheng X-H, Xia H-T. Cystic dilation of bile duct: new
clinical classication and treatment strategy. Chin J Digest Surg.
2013b;12(5):370–7.
Dreizin D, Bodanapally UK, Neerchal N, etal. Volumetric analysis of
pelvic hematomas after blunt trauma using semi-automated seeded
region growing segmentation: a method validation study. Abdom
Radiol (NY). 2016;41(11):2203–8.
Endo I, Shimada H, Sugita M, etal. Role of three-dimensional imag-
ing in operative planning for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery.
2007;142(5):666–75.
Fang C-H, Zhong S-Z, Wu K-C. Three-dimensional reconstruction
of hepatic duct system by MRI and CT. World Chin J Digest.
2004;12(1):216–7.
Fang CH, Xie AW, Chen ML, etal. Application of a visible simulation
surgery technique in preoperation planning for intrahepatic calculi.
World J Surg. 2010;34(2):327–35.
Fang CH, Liu J, Fan YF, etal. Outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatoli-
thiasis based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technique. J Am Coll
Surg. 2013;217(2):280–8.
Fang C-H, Fang C-S, Cai W. Establishment and value of three-
dimensional visualization diagnosis platform in the treatment of
hepatolithiasis. Chin J Surg. 2015;35(9):974–8.
Farges O, Regimbeau JM, Fuks D, etal. Multicentre European study
of preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J
Surg. 2013;100(2):274–83.
Germain T, Favelier S, Cercueil JP, etal. Liver segmentation: practical
tips. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95(11):1003–16.
Gluszek S, Kot M, Balchanowski N, etal. Iatrogenic bile duct injuries-
-clinical problems. Pol Przegl Chir. 2014;86(1):17–25.
Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW.Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arter-
ies in 1000 cases. Ann Surg. 1994;220(1):50–2.
Hirose T, Igami T, Ebata T, et al. Surgical and radiologi-
cal studies on the length of the hepatic ducts. World J Surg.
2015;39(12):2983–9.
Honma S, Matsuda W, Kudo M.Right hepatic artery traveling anteri-
orly to the common bile duct. Anat Sci Int. 2013;88(2):93–6.
Huang Z-Q, Huang X-Q, Zhou NI-X.Perihepatic hilar surgery: concept
and practice. Chin J Digest Surg. 2002;1(3):153–9.
Jiang Y, Zhang S-D. Hilar exploration and biliary operation. J Surg
Concepts Pract. 2001;6(3):133–4.
Kawarada Y, Das BC, Taoka H.Anatomy of the hepatic hilar area: the
plate system. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(6):580–6.
Kawasaki S, Imamura H, Kobayashi A, etal. Results of surgical resec-
tion for patients with hilar bile duct cancer: application of extended
hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein
embolization. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):84–92.
Kennedy TJ, Yopp A, Qin Y, etal. Role of preoperative biliary drainage
of liver remnant prior to extended liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(5):445–51.

452
J. Wang et al.
Kitami M, Takase K, Murakami G, etal. Types and frequencies of bili-
ary tract variations associated with a major portal venous anomaly:
analysis with multi-detector row CT cholangiography. Radiology.
2006;238(1):156–66.
Kobayashi K, Matsui O, Yoshikawa J, Kadoya M, Kawamori Y,
Takashima T.Right hepatic arterial supply to the posterior aspect of
segment IV of the liver: analysis by CT during hepatic arteriogra-
phy. Abdom Imaging. 1999;24:591–593.19.
Kokudo T, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, etal. Pitfall of right lateral sec-
tor graft procurement: supraportal right posterior hepatic artery.
Transplantation. 2013;96(12):e89–91.
Kuhns LR, Borlaza G.Normal roentgen variant: aberrant right hepatic
artery on computed tomography. Radiology. 1980;135(2):392.
Lau W-Y, Zhang S-X, Jiang H-C.Expert consensus on accurate diagno-
sis and treatment of complex liver tumor by 3D visualization. Chin
J Pract Surg. 2017a;1:53–9.
Lau Y-Y, Zhang S-X, Jiang H-C. Expert consensus on accurate
diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with three-
dimensional visualization. Chin J Pract Surg. 2017b;1:48–52.
Li C-Y, Ni Q-H, Wang J.Diagnosis and treatment of complicated intra-
hepatic bile duct stone: an efcacy analysis of 60 cases. Chin J Pract
Surg. 2016;36(3):316–8.
Lopez-Andujar R, Moya A, Montalva E, et al. Lessons learned from
anatomic variants of the hepatic artery in 1,081 transplanted livers.
Liver Transpl. 2007;13(10):1401–4.
Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. Local staging of pancreatic
cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by
pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT.AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1997;168(6):1439–43.
Marescaux J, Clement JM, Tassetti V, et al. Virtual reality applied
to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg.
1998;228(5):627–34.
Mariolis-Sapsakos T, Kalles V, Papatheodorou K, etal. Anatomic varia-
tions of the right hepatic duct: results and surgical implications from
a cadaveric study. Anat Res Int. 2012;2012:838179.
Matsumura H.The signicance of the morphology of the dorsal pan-
creatic artery in determining the presence of the accessory right
hepatic artery passing behind the portal vein. Kaibogaku Zasshi.
1998;73(5):517–27.
Matsuyama R, Mori R, Ota Y, etal. Signicance of vascular resection
and reconstruction in surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: with
special reference to hepatic arterial resection and reconstruction.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(Suppl 4):475–84.
Michels NA.Newer anatomy of the liver and its variant blood supply
and collateral circulation. Am J Surg. 1966a;112(3):337–47.
Michels NA.Newer anatomy of the liver and its variantblood supply
and collateral circulation. Am J Surg. 1966b;112:337–47.
Miyayama S, Matsui O, Taki K, Minami T, Ryu Y, Ito C, etal. Arterial
blood supply to the posterior aspect of segment IV of the liver from
the caudate branch: demonstration at CT after iodized oil injection.
Radiology. 2005;237:1110–1114.18.
Miyazaki M, Ohtsuka M, Miyakawa S, etal. Classication of biliary
tract cancers established by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-
Pancreatic Surgery: 3(rd.) English edition. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat
Sci. 2015;22(3):181–96.
Moole H, Bechtold M, Puli SR.Efcacy of preoperative biliary drain-
age in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and system-
atic review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):182.
Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, etal. Extended resections for hilar
cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1999;230(6):808–18. discussion
819
Ni Q-h, Zhang Y-h, Chen W. Application of multi-slice spiral CT
and three-dimensional reconstruction in diagnosis and treatment
of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg.
2015;27(1):84–5.
Ni Q, Wang H, Liang X, etal. Successful parenchyma-sparing anatomi-
cal surgery by 3-dimensional reconstruction of hilar cholangiocarcinoma combined with anatomic variation. J Coll Physicians Surg
Pak. 2016;26(6 Suppl):S13–5.
Ni Q, Wang H, Zhang Y, etal. MDCT assessment of resectability in hilar
cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(3):851–60.
Noie T, Sugawara Y, Imamura H, et al. Selective versus total drainage
for biliary obstruction in the hepatic hilus: an experimental study.
Surgery. 2001;130(1):74–81.
Ohkubo M, Nagino M, Kamiya J, etal. Surgical anatomy of the bile
ducts at the hepatic hilum as applied to living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2004;239(1):82–6.
Ozden I, Kamiya J, Nagino M, etal. Clinicoanatomical study on the infra-
portal bile ducts of segment 3. World J Surg. 2002;26(12):1441–5.
Park HS, Lee JM, Choi JY, et al. Preoperative evaluation of bile duct
cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2008;190(2):396–405.
Rau HG, Schauer R, Helmberger T, et al. Impact of virtual real-
ity imaging on hepatic liver tumor resection: calculation of risk.
Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2000;385(3):162–70.
Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, etal. The pattern of inltration at
the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases. Ann Surg. 1998;227(3):405–11.
Saluja SS, Nayeem M, Sharma BC, etal. Management of choledochal
cysts and their complications. Am Surg. 2012;78(3):284–90.
Schmidt SC, Langrehr JM, Hintze RE, etal. Long-term results and risk
factors inuencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following
cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92(1):76–82.
Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K, etal. Long-term outcome of extended
hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and
high survival rate. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):73–83.
Shimizu H, Sawada S, Kimura F, et al. Clinical signicance of bili-
ary vascular anatomy of the right liver for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
applied to left hemihepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):435–9.
Shimizu H, Hosokawa I, Ohtsuka M, et al. Clinical signicance of
anatomical variant of the left hepatic artery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma applied to right-sided hepatectomy. World J Surg.
2014;38(12):3210–4.
Sinanan MN. Acute cholangitis. Infect Dis Clin N Am.
1992;6(3):571–99.
Soares KC, Kamel I, Cosgrove DP, etal. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma:
diagnosis, treatment options, and management. Hepatobiliary Surg
Nutr. 2014;3(1):18–34.
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ.An analysis of the problem of bili-
ary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg.
1995;180(1):101–25.
Takahashi Y, Nagino M, Nishio H, etal. Percutaneous transhepatic bili-
ary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J
Surg. 2010;97(12):1860–6.
Takeishi K, Shirabe K, Yoshida Y, etal. Correlation between portal vein
anatomy and bile duct variation in 407 living liver donors. Am J
Transplant. 2015;15(1):155–60.
Takeshita N, Ota T, Yamamoto M. Forty-year experience with ow-
diversion surgery for patients with congenital choledochal cysts
with pancreaticobiliary maljunction at a single institution. Ann
Surg. 2011;254(6):1050–3.
Tao H-S.Application of 3D visualization technology in diagnosis and
treatment of central liver cancer: Southern Medical University;
2016.
Tirumani SH, Shanbhogue AK, Vikram R, etal. Imaging of the porta
hepatis: spectrum of disease. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):73–92.
Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, etal. Congenital bile duct cysts:
classication, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven
cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg.
1977;134(2):263–9.

17 Application of3D Visualization Technology inPerihilar Surgery
453
Unno M, Okumoto T, Katayose Y, et al. Preoperative assessment of
hilar cholangiocarcinoma by multidetector row computed tomogra-
phy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(5):434–40.
Varotti G, Gondolesi GE, Goldman J, etal. Anatomic variations in right
liver living donors. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(4):577–82.
Wang J.Diagnosis and treatment of complicated intrahepatic bile duct
stones. Chin J Pract Surg. 2016;36(3):292–5.
Wang J. Application of perihepatic portal surgery in reoperation
of complex intrahepatic bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Surg.
2017a;25(3):161–3.
Wang J.Treatment of restenosis after repair of high bile duct injury by
peri hilar surgery. Chin J General Surg. 2017b;32(8)
Wang J, Chen W.Application of bilioenterostomy in the treatment of
hilar bile duct stricture. Chin J Pract Surg. 2014;34(10):921–4.
Wang J, Chen W.Application of perihilar surgical techniques in biliary
tract surgery. Chin J Digest Surg. 2015;14(4):284–7.
Wang H, Wang J.Analysis of post-operative effect of 29 patients with
iatrogenic bile duct injury. J Surg Concepts Pract. 2011;16(4):355–8.
Wang L, Yu WF.Obstructive jaundice and perioperative management.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica. 2014;52(1):22–9.
Wang S, He X, Li Z, Peng Z, Tam NL, Sun C, etal. Characterization
of the middle hepatic artery and its relevance to living donor liver
transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:736–41.
Weiglein AH.Variations and topography of the arteries in the lesser
omentum in humans. Clin Anat. 1996;9(3):143–50.
Wigmore SJ, Redhead DN, Yan XJ, etal. Virtual hepatic resection using
three-dimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography
angioportograms. Ann Surg. 2001;233(2):221–6.
Wu CC, Ho WL, Chen JT, etal. Mesohepatectomy for centrally located
hepatocellular carcinoma: an appraisal of a rare procedure. J Am
Coll Surg. 1999;188(5):508–15.
Xiang CH, Dong JH.The basis of precisely surgical therapy for hilar
cholangiocarcinoma-the imaging evaluation of advance degree of
cancer before operation. Contemp Med. 2009;15(26):68–71.
Yan J, Feng H, Wang H, etal. Hepatic artery classication based on
three-dimensional CT.Br J Surg. 2020a;107(7):906–16. https://doi.
org/10.1002/bjs.11458.
Yan J, Feng H, Wang H, Yuan F, Yang C, Liang X, et al. Hepatic
artery classication based on three-dimensional CT. Br J Surg.
2020b;107:906–16.
Yoshioka Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, etal. “Supraportal” right posterior
hepatic artery: an anatomic trap in hepatobiliary and transplant surgery. World J Surg. 2011;35(6):1340–4.
Yu WB, Rao A, Vu V, etal. Management of centrally located hepatocel-
lular carcinoma: update 2016. World J Hepatol. 2017;9(13):627–34.
Zhu XY, Fang CH, Bao SS, etal. Reconstruction of the liver based
on 64-slice spiral CT scanning data[J]. J South Med Univ.
2008;28(3):345–7.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
