Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
75 Мб
Скачать
ab
15 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andTreatment ofGallbladder Cancer
347
c
Fig. 15.5 (continued)
3D Visualization ofTumor andPortal Vein System
Due to the variety of portal vein variations and the frequent morphological, structural, and pathological changes of the hepatic hilar in gallbladder carcinoma, it is highly relevant when dening the variation of portal vein course and conu­ence pattern preoperatively to avoid damage to the abnormal conuence of portal vein branches, and to guide portal vein resection and reconstruction (Figs.15.7 and 15.8).
3D Visualization ofTumor andBiliary System
To determine the variation of biliary tract system and to guide the choice of surgical methods for bile duct recon­struction (Figs.15.9 and 15.10).
3D Visualization ofVirtual Surgery
The residual liver volume was calculated to evaluate the safety of operation. As shown in Fig. 15.11, the lesion is located at the fundus and neck of the gallbladder, breaking through the serosa layer and is considered as gallbladder cancer (T3N0M0). For extended right hepatectomy: the vol­ume of extended right hepatectomy is 754cm3, accounting
c
Fig. 15.6 Adjacent relationship between tumor and hepatic arterial system. (a) Anterior view; (b) posterior view; (c) image fusion
348
Y. Liu et al.
a
b
c
Fig. 15.7 CT images of portal vein system (portal venous phase)
for 75.2% of the total liver volume, while the remaining residual liver volume is 249cm3, accounting for 24.8% of the total liver volume. For extended left hepatectomy, the vol­ume of extended left hepatectomy is 537cm3, accounting for
53.5% of the total liver volume, while the remaining residual liver volume is 467cm3, accounting for 46.5% of the total liver volume. For S4b+S5 segmentectomy: the volume of liver segments S4b+S5 is 116cm3, accounting for 11.6% of the total liver volume, while the remaining residual liver vol­ume is 887cm3, accounting for 88.4% of the total liver vol­ume. Above all, the liver S4b+S5 segmentectomy should be selected.
15.3.4 Value of3D Visualization intheDiagnosis andTreatment ofGallbladder Cancer
The ultimate goal of applying a three-dimensional visualiza­tion system is to guide precise hepatobiliary surgery. Its greatest advantage is visualization and repeatability. After fully analyzing the distribution, course, variation of the com­plex hepatic duct system and their adjacent relationship to the tumor, the relationship of hepatic vessels (portal vein, hepatic vein, inferior vena cava) to bile duct was evaluated. With the system’s multiple display functions such as arbi-
ab
ab
15 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andTreatment ofGallbladder Cancer
c
349
Fig. 15.8 Adjacent relationship between tumor and portal vein system. (a) Anterior view; (b) Lateral view; (c) Image fusion
Fig. 15.9 Imaging of biliary system. (a) CT image; (b) MRCP image; (c) PTCD image
350
ab
Y. Liu et al.
c
Fig. 15.9 (continued)
c
Fig. 15.10 Adjacent relationship between tumor and biliary system. (a) Anterior view; (b) Posterior view; (c) Image fusion
ab
15 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andTreatment ofGallbladder Cancer
c
351
Fig. 15.11 Image of virtual surgical resection. (a) Extended right hepatectomy; (b) extended left hepatectomy; (c) Liver resection of S4b+5
trary movement, rotation, zooming, simulated segmentation; simulated surgery is performed. The spatial relationship between the intrahepatic vascular tree and bile duct tree can be accurately mastered before an operation, to predict the complicated and dangerous conditions that might occur in the actual operation. When the cut layer involves important blood vessels or bile ducts in the liver with a risk of injury, modications can be made accordingly. After simulating dif­ferent surgical plans and comparing the advantages and dis­advantages of various programs, a reasonable individualized surgical plan can be formulated, and necessary preventive measures taken in advance. Through the modication and optimization of the surgical path, the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications can be minimized, and the suc­cess rate of the operation can be improved.
15.4 Application of3D Visualization Technology inCombined Hepatectomy andPancreaticoduodenectomy

15.4.1 Surgical Indications

15.4.1.1 Indication forCombined Hepatectomy
Currently, the surgical procedure for gallbladder cancer is mainly based on the Nevin staging and T stage of TNM stag-
ing issued jointly by the American Joint Cancer Commission (AJCC) and the International Union against Cancer (UICC). Because there is no serosa on the liver surface of the gall­bladder, the T1b stage gallbladder carcinoma located at this site may cause micrometastasis of the liver bed, but the dis­tance is less than 16mm; therefore, for gallbladder cancer located at stage T1b, wedge resection of the liver is recom­mended at a distance of more than 2cm from the gallbladder bed. In the T2 phase, the gallbladder cancer cells ow into the liver through the gallbladder vein gyrus to an average distance of 2–5cm from the gallbladder bed, and at least one direction range is more than 4cm, so at least cholecystec­tomy with the S4b S5 segment of the liver should be per­formed. For the T3 phase, the tumor has invaded broke through the serous layer and/or directly invaded the liver, and/or invaded an adjacent organ or tissue structure outside the liver. Therefore, conventional extended lymph node dis­section is recommended. For patients with T3N0 stage, cho­lecystectomy combined with hepatic S4b S5 resection plus extended lymph node dissection was required; for patients with T3N1 stage, it is suggested that cancer cells transferred to the entire right half liver along the lymphatic system or Glisson system should be treated with extended lymph node dissection. The tumor of stage T4 gallbladder cancer invades the main portal vein or hepatic artery, or more than 2 extra­hepatic organs or tissues, so it is possible to achieve R0 resection in patients with stage T4N0M0 and T4N1M0 gall-
352
Y. Liu et al.
bladder cancer by combined extended radical resection of involved organs.
15.4.1.2 Indications forCombined
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Whether combined pancreaticoduodenectomy is required mainly involves three conditions: abdominal para-aortic lymph node metastasis, invasion of the middle and lower common bile duct, and direct invasion of the head of the pan­creas. Of the three, the relationship between lymph node metastasis and HPD should be particularly cautious. Gallbladder cancer is very prone to lymph node metastasis. Numerous studies have found that once gallbladder cancer invades the muscularis, lymph node metastasis occurs in 25%~62% of cases (Fong etal. 2000). Generally speaking, lymph node metastasis is most likely to occur in the hepato­duodenal ligament (pN1), but there are not a few cases of lymph node (pN2) metastasis before and after pancreatic head, up to 8%~14% (Tsukada etal. 1996). In a report of 5 cases of gallbladder cancer with initial symptoms of obstruc­tive jaundice, the authors from Johns Hopkins University concluded that in some cases, gallbladder cancer had metas­tasized to the anterior and posterior pancreatic head and even para-aortic lymph nodes with limited hepatic inltration (Doty etal. 2002). Although pN2 lymphatic metastasis is a sign of poor prognosis, some scholars have performed exten­sive radical surgery and achieved good results. For example, Sasaki etal. (2004) obtained a satisfactory 5-year survival rate after liver S4b + S5 resection, pancreaticoduodenec­tomy, and enlarged regional lymph node dissection in such patients. Lymph node metastasis of abdominal aorta was classied into the M1 stage, which was previously consid­ered as a contraindication for a radical mastectomy of gall­bladder carcinoma. However, in recent years, Nishio etal. (2007) reviewed and analyzed the patients who underwent radical resection of single-center 166IV gallbladder carci­noma. It is pointed out that patients with paraventricular lymph node metastasis and other M1 stage patients may ben­et from HPD operation, and the prognosis is signicantly better than that of patients who give up the operation. Therefore, it is suggested that HPD should be performed in patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Combined with literature reports and clinical experience, the author believes that for patients with locally advanced gallbladder cancer, HPD surgery can be considered in the following cases: the tumor is already in the advanced stage, but if the location is limited, it can be separated from the surrounding tissues; the tumor invaded the liver, lower common bile duct, pancreas, and duodenum; the retropancreatic lymph node metastasis; for those with para-aortic lymph node metastasis, HPD may be considered even without direct pancreatic head or duodenal inltration.

15.4.2 Preoperative Preparation

15.4.2.1 Assessment ofLiver Function Reserve
The conditions of radical resection of gallbladder cancer include:
• The lesions of gallbladder and its adjacent organs and regional metastatic lymph nodes can be removed.
• The residual liver function can be compensated, and the integrity of its vascular structure can be preserved or reconstructed.
• The patient can tolerate the surgical trauma.
As mentioned above, the range of hepatectomy for gall-
bladder cancer patients is based on stage T of the TNM stag­ing published jointly by the AJCC and The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). Hepatectomy is an essential treatment for hepatobiliary diseases. Due to hepato­biliary diseases complicated with liver parenchyma damage, liver function reserve is reduced to varying degrees, and liver insufciency after hepatectomy has become an important cause of perioperative death of patients. Accurate preopera­tive assessment of liver reserve function is of great signi­cance for the selection of reasonable treatment methods, the safe range of hepatectomy, and the reduction of the incidence of postoperative liver failure.
There are many methods to evaluate liver reserve func-
tion. The main methods can be divided into ve categories:
• Liver serum biochemical test.
• Comprehensive scoring system.
• Quantitative liver function test.
• Imaging evaluation of hepatic parenchyma and vascular lesions.
• Liver volume measurement.
A comprehensive assessment should be made according
to the patient’s general condition, the function of the liver, and other vital organs as well as tumor stages. The staging of gallbladder cancer was evaluated according to the results of MSCT and MRI.For patients requiring large-scale hepa­tectomy, the liver function reserve and liver volume should be quantitatively evaluated before surgery, so as to deter­mine the patients’ required functional liver volume and safe liver resection volume. It is generally considered that healthy liver can tolerate hepatectomy with 75% ~ 80% parenchyma resection or hepatectomy with 20%~25% of residual liver functional volume. The future liver volume (FLR) of patients with jaundice should be more than 40%. Specic criteria can be referred to as the Expert Consensus
on Assessment of Liver Reserve Function before Hepatectomy (2011 edition).
ab
cd
15 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andTreatment ofGallbladder Cancer
353
15.4.2.2 Assessment ofImaging Examination
Radical surgery should ensure that the margin reaches R0 resection without invasion of tumor cells. The prognosis of gallbladder cancer patients is closely related to radical resection. Preoperative clinical and imaging data of gallblad­der cancer patients should be fully collected to evaluate whether radical resection is feasible. Imaging examinations, including B-ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasonography, enhanced abdominal CT (Fig.15.12), and MRI, are helpful for the diagnosis and staging of gallbladder cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) can detect potential occult metastases. Laparoscopy can rule out the possibility of small peritoneal implantation metastasis of gallbladder carcinoma before the operation.
15.4.2.3 Preoperative 3D Visualization Evaluation
3D visualization based on CT or MRI is becoming more and more mature and plays a key role in the preoperative evaluation of gallbladder cancer. Two-dimensional data were obtained by 64-slice spiral CT plain scan of the upper
abdomen and phase iii enhanced scan before the operation and stored in DICOM format. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the data was carried out by MI-3DVS.The local anatomical relationship and vascular variation were carefully observed from multiple perspectives with the application of transparent visualization technology. The location of the gallbladder tumor and its three-dimensional adjacent relationship with surrounding tissues and vessels were determined, and the resectability of the tumor was evaluated in detail. We applied 3D visualization technol­ogy in radical cholecystectomy, with the aim of: making the preoperative evaluation more accurate, helping to make the resectable judgment and guide the rational choice of surgical approach, and to safely and effectively complete radical cholecystectomy, improving the R0 resection rate of tumor in a real sense, and improving the prognosis of patients. By magnifying, narrowing, rotating, and trans­parent processing of reconstructed images, the anatomical location and relationship of gallbladder tumors, livers, and major peripheral blood vessels (such as the celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, portal vein, and superior mes-
Fig. 15.12 (a-d) CT images of gallbladder cancer
354
ab
cd
Y. Liu et al.
enteric vein, common bile duct and adjacent organs such as the stomach, duodenum, and transverse colon) can be clearly displayed; so as to guide the preoperative resect­ability assessment (Fig.15.13). Compared with traditional two-dimensional images, 3D visualization can not only reproduce the size, location, and distribution or variation of surrounding blood vessels of the gallbladder, but also rotate it at any angle and zoom into important parts at will. The dynamic observation of the 3D gallbladder space-
occupying lesion and its adjacent relationships can not only guarantee the safety of operation but also help doc­tors to locate the lesion before operation accurately, guide doctors to choose the appropriate surgical approach and evaluate the curative effect and risk. At the same time, pre­operative simulated surgery can be carried out. During the operation, effective preventive measures can be taken to control intraoperative bleeding, shorten the operation time, and minimize the trauma to the body.
Fig. 15.13 (a-f) 3D reconstructed images of gallbladder cancer
15 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andTreatment ofGallbladder Cancer
ef
355
Fig. 15.13 (continued)

15.4.3 Surgical Procedures

15.4.3.1 Resection Range
Range ofLiver Resection
For liver-bed gallbladder carcinoma in stage T1b, it is rec­ommended to perform wedge-shaped resection with a row spacing of >2 cm from the gallbladder bed. For stage T2, cholecystectomy with hepatic S4b+S5 should be performed at least. For patients with stage T3N0, cholecystectomy com­bined with hepatic S4b+S5 resection plus extended lymph node dissection should be performed. For patients with stage T3N1, it is suggested that cancer cells metastasized to the whole right liver along with the lymphatic system or Glisson system, requiring right hepatic resection or right trisectio­nectomy plus expanded lymph node dissection. Gallbladder cancer tumor in stage T4 invades the main portal vein or hepatic artery, or more than two extrahepatic organs or tissue structures. For patients with stage T4N0MO and T4N1M0 gallbladder cancer, extended radical resection combined with resection of involved organs may still achieve R0 resection.
Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy
The pancreas is severed at the left margin of the portal vein– superior mesenteric vein junction and the head of the pan­creas, including the uncinate process of the pancreas, is
completely resected. At the conuence of the gallbladder duct, the common hepatic duct is transected, and the extrahe­patic bile duct, distal stomach, duodenum, and proximal part of the jejunum are resected below the hepatic hilum. Gerota fascia is removed along with the pancreatic head, and lymph nodes and plexus in the region are removed.
15.4.3.2 Surgical Steps (A Case ofGallbladder Cancer Invading Duodenum)
Step 1 Laparoscopic or laparotomy exploration. Specic
surgical methods were determined according to the results of preoperative imaging, 3D visualization, and intraoper­ative exploration. Radical resection was determined, gen­erally taking a right upper abdominal reverse “L” incision into the abdomen. The tumor was located in the base of the gallbladder, with about 6cm diameter and invading the duodenum (Fig.15.14).
Step 2 Expanding Kocher’s incision. Kocher technique
was used to explore the posterior pancreatic head; the Peng’s Multifunction Operative Dissector (PMOD) tech­nique was used to incise the duodenal peritoneum (Fig.15.15). The left anterior transverse mesocolon was incised. The descending part of the duodenum, the hori­zontal part, and the head of the pancreas were freed from the retroperitoneal to the left side of the abdominal aorta. The right side of the root of the superior mesenteric artery was exposed above the level of the left abdominal aorta
356
Y. Liu et al.
Fig. 15.14 Gallbladder carcinoma involving the duodenum
Fig. 15.15 Kocher incision
Fig. 15.17 Lymph nodes between inferior vena cava and abdominal
aorta were dissected
Fig. 15.18 Dissecting the distal stomach
Fig. 15.16 Revealing the left renal vein
and left renal vein. The inferior vena cava and adipose lymphoid tissue around abdominal aorta were removed (Figs.15.15, 15.16, and 15.17).
Step 3 The right gastrocolic ligament was severed. The greater omentum was opened at the upper edge of the transverse colon, the greater omentum, and the right half of the anterior transverse mesocolic lobe were resected, the right side of the middle colon artery was severed and ligated at the root of the right gastrocolic vein. At the same time, the lymph nodes of group 14V were dissected. The fth group of lymph nodes on the upper edge of the
Fig. 15.19 Hepatoduodenal ligament dissection
right gastric artery was dissected, and the body of the stomach was severed. About 40% of the distal stomach was resected (Fig.15.18).
Step 4 The lymphatic adipose tissue around the common hepatic artery was dissociated from the root of the left gastric artery along the right side of the common hepatic artery. The hepatoduodenal ligament was dissected with PMOD, and skeletal dissection was carried out (Fig.15.19).