Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword I
- •Foreword II
- •Foreword III
- •Foreword IV
- •Contributors
- •Manuscripts Translation and Preparation
- •1.1 Introduction
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •Deputy Editors
- •1.2.2.2 Gallbladder
- •1.2.2.3 Cystic Duct
- •1.2.2.4 Common Bile Duct
- •Supraduodenal Portion
- •Retroduodenal Portion
- •Pancreatic Portion
- •Intraduodenal Portion
- •1.3.2 Data Acquisition
- •1.3.2.2 Bile Duct Perfusion
- •1.3.2.3 Hepatic Artery Perfusion
- •1.3.2.4 Specimen Perfusion Fixation
- •1.4.1 Liver Dissection after Biliary Tract Perfusion
- •1.4.3.1 Image Registration After Bile Duct Perfusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Basic Principles
- •2.2.2.1 Methods
- •Preparation
- •Scanning Modalities
- •Contrast-Enhanced Scanning
- •Contrast-Enhanced Examination
- •Shaded Surface Display
- •Maximum Intensity Projection
- •Volume Rendering
- •2.3.1.1 MRI Devices
- •The Magnet
- •The Gradient System
- •The Radiofrequency System
- •Radiofrequency Coils
- •The Computer System
- •Other Auxiliary Equipment
- •2.3.2.1 MRI Preparations
- •Patient Preparation
- •2.3.2.2 Regular Scan Sequences
- •Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo Coronal Sequences
- •2D or 3D T2W1
- •Transaxial Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo Fat Suppression Sequences
- •Dynamic Enhancement Sequence
- •3D Volumetric Acquisitions
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •2D Continuous Thin-Slice Scanning
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •2D Thick-Slice Projection Imaging
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Congenital Biliary Diseases
- •3.2.1 Congenital Extrahepatic Biliary Atresia
- •3.2.1.1 CT Features
- •3.2.1.2 MRI Features
- •3.2.2 Biliary Dilatation
- •Type I
- •Type II
- •Type III
- •Type IV
- •Type V
- •3.2.2.2 Radiographic Features
- •CT Features
- •MRI Features
- •3.2.3 Bile Duct Hamartomas
- •3.2.3.1 CT Features
- •3.2.3.2 MRI Features
- •3.3 Common Gallbladder Diseases
- •3.3.1 Acute Cholecystitis
- •3.3.1.1 Radiographic Features
- •CT Features
- •MRI Features
- •Gangrenous Cholecystitis
- •Emphysematous Cholecystitis
- •Pediatric Cholecystitis
- •Pregnancy Cholecystitis
- •Gallbladder Empyema
- •Gallbladder Perforation
- •Hemorrhagic Cholecystitis
- •3.3.5 Other Gallbladder Tumors
- •3.3.5.3 Primary Gallbladder Lymphoma
- •3.3.5.4 Gallbladder Fibrosarcoma
- •3.3.6 Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis
- •3.3.6.1 CT Features
- •3.3.6.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.7 Gallbladder Adenomyomatosis
- •3.3.2 Chronic Cholecystitis
- •3.3.2.1 CT Features
- •3.3.2.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.3 Gallstones
- •3.3.3.1 CT Features
- •3.3.3.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.4 Gallbladder Cancer
- •3.3.4.1 CT Features
- •3.3.4.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.4.3 MRCP Features
- •3.3.7.1 CT Features
- •3.3.7.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.8.1 CT Features
- •3.3.9 Gallbladder Torsion
- •3.3.9.1 Type I
- •3.3.9.2 Type II
- •3.3.10.2 Gallbladder Sludge
- •3.3.11 Mirizzi’s Syndrome
- •3.3.11.1 CT Features
- •3.3.11.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.12 Post-Cholecystectomy Syndrome
- •3.4.1 Bile Duct Stones
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •3.4.2 Suppurative Cholangitis/Acute Cholangitis
- •3.4.3 Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
- •3.4.3.1 CT Findings
- •3.4.3.2 MRI Findings
- •3.4.4 Secondary Sclerotic Cholangitis
- •3.4.5 Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis
- •3.4.5.1 CT Findings
- •3.4.6 Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.6.1 CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •MRCP Features
- •3.4.7 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.7.3 Special Manifestations
- •3.4.8 Periampullary Carcinoma
- •3.4.8.1 Radiographic Findings
- •3.4.8.2 CT Findings
- •3.4.8.3 MRI Findings
- •3.4.9 Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.9.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.9.2 MRI Findings
- •3.5.1.1 Intrahepatic Biliary Dilatation
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •3.5.1.2 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Dilatation
- •3.5.2.1 Hilar Obstruction
- •3.5.2.3 Pancreatic Obstruction
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.2.1 CT Acquisition Protocols
- •4.1.2.2 Data Preprocessing
- •4.1.2.3 Medical Image Segmentation
- •4.1.2.4 3D Visualization
- •4.2.1 Image Registration
- •4.2.1.1 Template Matching Algorithm
- •4.2.1.2 Registration Steps
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •4.2.2 Image Segmentation
- •Pixel Based Methods
- •Region Based Methods
- •Edge Based Methods
- •Model Based Methods
- •4.2.2.3 Serialized Segmentation Model
- •4.2.2.4 Adaptive Region Growing Algorithm
- •4.2.3 3D Reconstruction
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •Fused Deposition Modeling
- •Stereolithography
- •Selected Laser Sintering
- •Direct Metal Laser Sintering
- •Laminated Object Manufacturing
- •Electron Beam Melting
- •Three-Dimensional Printing
- •High-Performance 3D Reconstruction Software
- •5.1.2.2 Medical Model Manufacturing
- •5.1.2.3 Tissue/Organ Regeneration
- •5.2.2 Digital Preparation
- •5.3.1.1 In Complex Liver Resection
- •5.3.1.2 In Liver Transplantation
- •5.3.2.1 In Cholangiocarcinoma Surgery
- •5.3.4 Prospects
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.1.1 Virtual Anatomy
- •6.1.2 Surgical Simulation
- •Improved Doctor–Patient Relationship
- •Reduced Surgical Costs
- •Remote Intervention
- •6.2 Virtual Surgical Instruments
- •6.2.1 Geometric Modeling
- •6.2.2 Motion Modeling
- •6.2.3 Physical Modeling
- •6.3 Surgical Simulation
- •6.3.1 The Hardware System
- •6.3.2 Software System
- •6.3.2.1 FreeForm Modeling System
- •6.3.2.2 Open Graphics Library
- •6.3.2.3 Tactile Development Kit
- •6.4.4 Discussion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Duodenoscopy
- •8.3 Choledochoscopy
- •8.3.1 Preoperative Application
- •8.3.2 Intraoperative Application
- •8.3.3 Postoperative Application
- •8.4 Capsule Endoscopy
- •8.5 Laparoscope
- •8.6 Endoscopic Ultrasound
- •8.7 3D Visualization-Assisted Endoscopic Technology
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.3.1.1 Arterial Phase
- •9.3.1.2 Portal Venous Phase
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1.2 Image Segmentation
- •10.2.1.3 3D Reconstruction
- •10.2.1.4 Surgical Simulation
- •Surgical Procedure
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.2 Image Registration
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1 Imaging
- •12.2.2 Other Auxiliary Examinations
- •12.2.2.1 Biliary Manometry
- •12.2.2.2 Cholescintigraphy
- •12.2.2.3 Selective Celiac Arteriography
- •12.3.1 Collection Equipment
- •12.3.3 Plain Scan
- •12.3.4 Dynamic Enhanced CT Scan
- •12.4.1 Image Registration
- •12.6.1 Semiautomatic Liver Segmentation
- •Surgical Procedures
- •Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.2 Anatomical or Regular Hepatectomy Guided by 3D Visualization
- •12.10.2.1 Indications
- •12.10.2.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.2.4 Surgical Procedures
- •For Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy
- •For Anatomical Left Hemihepatectomy
- •12.10.3.1 Contraindication
- •12.10.3.3 Surgical Procedures
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •12.10.4.1 Indications
- •12.10.4.2 Contraindication
- •12.10.4.4 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.4.5 Attention
- •12.10.5.1 Indications
- •12.10.5.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.5.3 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.5.4 Attention
- •12.10.6.1 Indications
- •12.10.6.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.6.3 Preoperative Imaging Evaluation
- •12.10.6.4 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.6.5 Attention
- •12.10.7.1 Indications
- •12.10.7.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.7.3 Surgical procedures
- •12.10.7.4 Attention
- •12.10.8.1 Preoperative Evaluation
- •12.10.8.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •12.10.8.3 Contraindications
- •12.10.8.4 Operation Methods
- •12.10.8.5 Attention
- •12.10.9.1 Biliary Injury
- •Causes
- •Preventive Measures
- •12.10.9.2 Biliary Bleeding
- •12.10.9.3 Gastrointestinal Water Retention
- •Reasons
- •12.10.9.4 Biliary Leakage
- •12.11.1.1 Reasons
- •Main Reasons
- •Iatrogenic Biliary Tract Injury
- •Other Reasons
- •12.11.1.3 Surgical Procedures
- •Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy
- •Hepatectomy
- •Intrahepatic Lithotripsy Through Sinus Tract or PTCS
- •Severe Symptomatic Patients
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.3.1 Ultrasonography
- •13.3.2 Multi-Slice CT
- •13.3.5 Intraoperative Cholangiography
- •13.3.6 Radionuclide Hepatobiliary Scan
- •13.3.7 Digital Medicine Technology
- •Periampullary Tumor
- •Biliary Atresia
- •Acute Pancreatitis
- •Acute Cholecystitis
- •Hepatic Cyst
- •Hepatic Echinococcosis
- •Retroperitoneal Cystic Masses
- •13.4.2.1 Biliary Drainage
- •13.4.2.3 Liver Resection
- •13.4.2.4 Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- •13.4.2.5 Liver Transplantation
- •13.4.2.6 Laparoscopic Surgery
- •13.4.2.7 Reoperation
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1.1 Etiology
- •Anatomical Factors
- •Pathological Factors
- •Surgeon Factors
- •14.1.2.2 End-to-End Cholangiostomy
- •14.1.2.3 Choledochoduodenostomy
- •14.1.2.4 Roux-en-Y Cholangiojejunostomy
- •14.1.2.7 Liver Transplantation
- •14.2.2.1 Patient Information
- •14.2.2.2 Diagnosis
- •14.2.2.3 Complaint
- •14.2.2.4 History
- •14.2.2.5 Signs
- •14.2.2.6 Previous History
- •14.2.2.7 Laboratory Examination
- •Blood Routine
- •Coagulation Function
- •Liver Function
- •Renal Function
- •Tumor Markers
- •14.2.2.8 General Condition Assessment
- •Nutritional Status Evaluation
- •Liver Function Evaluation
- •Important Organ Function Evaluation
- •14.2.2.9 Imaging Evaluation
- •Evaluation by 3D Visualization
- •14.2.2.10 Surgical Planning
- •14.2.2.11 Surgical Procedures
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •14.2.3.1 Patient Information
- •14.2.3.2 Diagnosis
- •14.2.3.3 Complaint
- •14.2.3.4 History
- •14.2.3.5 Signs
- •14.2.3.6 Previous History
- •14.2.3.7 Laboratory Examination
- •Blood Routine
- •Coagulation Function
- •Liver Function
- •Renal Function
- •Tumor Markers
- •14.2.3.8 General Condition Assessment
- •Nutritional Status Evaluation
- •Liver Function Evaluation
- •Important Organ Function Evaluation
- •14.2.3.9 Imaging Evaluation
- •Evaluation by 3D Visualization
- •14.2.3.10 Surgical Planning
- •14.2.3.11 Surgical Procedure
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Clinical Stages
- •15.2.2 Surgical Strategy
- •Tis/T1a Stage
- •T1b Stage
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.2.2.2 Lymph Node Dissection Range
- •Stage Tis/T1a
- •Stage T1b
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.2.2.3 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Management
- •Stage Tis/T1a
- •Stage T1b
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.3.1 T Staging Assessment
- •15.3.1.1 Stage T2
- •MDCT
- •15.3.1.2 Stage T3
- •MDCT
- •15.3.1.3 Stage T4
- •15.3.3 Resectability Assessment
- •15.3.3.1 General Assessment
- •15.3.3.2 Liver Function Assessment
- •15.3.3.3 Virtual Surgery Assessment
- •15.4.1 Surgical Indications
- •15.4.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •15.4.2.3 Preoperative 3D Visualization Evaluation
- •15.4.3 Surgical Procedures
- •15.4.3.1 Resection Range
- •Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- •15.4.4 Surgical Prognosis
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.2.2 Imaging Diagnosis
- •16.2.2.3 Pathological Diagnosis
- •16.2.2.4 Clinical Staging
- •16.2.3.1 Preoperative Assessment
- •Liver Function Assessment
- •Resectability Assessment
- •3D Visualization Assessment
- •16.2.3.2 Surgical Approach
- •16.2.3.3 Controversial Point
- •Lymphadenectomy
- •Extended Hepatectomy
- •Liver Transplantation
- •Operative Prognosis
- •16.2.4 Multidisciplinary Team
- •16.2.5 Conclusion
- •Notes
- •16.3.4 Surgical Planning Guided by 3D Visualization
- •Type I
- •Type II
- •Type IIIa
- •Type IIIb
- •Type IVa
- •Type IVb
- •Type V
- •16.3.6.2 Typical Case
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •Case 5
- •16.3.6.4 Lymphadenectomy
- •16.3.6.6 Laparoscopic Exploration
- •16.3.6.7 Intraoperative Frozen Section Consultation
- •16.3.6.8 Liver Transplantation
- •Common Type
- •Type II Variation
- •Type III Variation
- •16.3.10 Other Comprehensive Treatment
- •16.3.11 Other Perioperative Management
- •16.3.11.2 Postoperative Follow-Up
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2.2.1 Perihilar Tumor
- •17.2.2.2 High Biliary Stricture
- •Hepatic Arterial Variation
- •Portal Vein Variations
- •Bile Duct Variations
- •17.3.2 Complex Pathophysiology
- •17.4.1.3 Preoperative Biliary Drainage
- •17.4.2.3 Cholangiojejunostomy
- •17.6 3D Visualization Imaging
- •Viscera Reconstruction
- •Lesion Reconstruction
- •Vascular Reconstruction
- •References

12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
c
247
d
Fig. 12.2 (continued)

248
Q. Lu et al.
e
f
Fig. 12.2 (continued)

12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
g
249
h
Fig. 12.2 (continued)

250
in
Q. Lu et al.
a
The proper
hepatic artery
The gastroduodenal
artery
The right hepatic vein
c
e
The middle hepatic vein
The left hepatic vein
The right hepatic duct
The calculus
The left hepatic duct
b
The main
portal ve
The right hepatic duct
d
f
The left hepatic
The common hepatic
duct
The gallbladder
Left
hepatatrophy
The common hepatic
duct
The gallbladder
g
Fig. 12.3 3D models of each system. (a) The reconstructed arterial
system; (b) the reconstructed portal vein system; (c) the reconstructed
hepatic vein and inferior vena cava; (d) the reconstructed biliary tract;
(e) the calculus of the bile duct is observed in the left outer lobe when
The hepatic vein
The hepatic artery
The bile duct
The portal vein
Type I Variation The portal vein was divided into the left
branch, right anterior branch, and right posterior branch at
the porta hepatis (Fig.12.6).
h
the transparency of the biliary system is 0.5; (f) Atrophy of left outer
lobe is observed in the reconstructed liver; (g) the 3D model when the
liver transparency is 0; (h) the 3D model of the hepatic internal structure is displayed when the liver transparency is 0.5
Type II Variation Portal vein rst issued the right posterior
branch, then moving upward to be divided into the right anterior branch and the left branch (Fig.12.7).

12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
Fig. 12.4 The 3D model when
the liver transparency is 1
251
RA
RP
Fig. 12.5 Normal type
LT
RA LT
RP
Fig. 12.6 Type I

252
RA LT
RP
Fig. 12.7 Type II
LT
Q. Lu et al.
Fig. 12.9 Other variations
12.6 Individualized Liver Segmentation
andVolume Calculation for3D
Visualization ofHepatolithiasis
RA
RP
Fig. 12.8 Type III
Type III Variation The right branch of the portal vein was
horizontally divided into an anterior branch and posterior
branch (Fig.12.8).
Other Variations
The absence of the left branch of the por-
tal vein; special variations: left branch of portal vein came
from the right anterior branch (Fig.12.9).
In patients with liver atrophy, hypertrophy, or biliary cirrhosis, 3D visualization and evaluation of liver vascular are particularly crucial for selecting surgical methods as well as
reducing the incidence of surgical complications and risk
because of its pathological changes.
In 1954, Couinaud (1954) divided the liver segment according to the distribution of the liver Glisson system and the
course of the hepatic vein and proposed a relatively complete
eight-segment method. He divided the liver into left and right
halves, four lobes, and eight functional segments. Each liver
segment can be considered as a functional anatomical unit of
the liver. The Couinaud segmentation classication has
become the anatomical basis of liver imaging and liver surgery and has been widely used in clinical practice. However,
it also has apparent defects because it is the research result of
in vitro liver casting, and its orientation term is for the
desktop, so it does not accord with the actual situation of
in vivo liver. Moreover, with the development of imaging
techniques, more and more studies show that only some of
the liver segments accord with Couinaud classication due
to the variation of hepatic vein and portal vein branches.
In addition to physiological changes, in patients with
complex hepatolithiasis, the portal vein is compressed and
deformed due to dilatation or inammatory changes of the
biliary system, resulting inlocal liver tissue nutrition deciency and brotic atrophy. In contrast, the healthy liver
exhibits compensatory proliferation, leading to atrophy and
hypertrophy of the liver, and even hepatic portal transposition. The hepatic segment with hepatolithiasis was different
from that of a healthy liver. The hepatic vein and portal vein
system (Figs. 12.10, 12.11, 12.12, 12.13, 12.14, 12.15,

12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
253
Fig. 12.12 Staining of Segments V, VI, VII, and VII
Fig. 12.10 Individualized segmentation
Fig. 12.11 Staining of Segments II, III, and IV
Fig. 12.13 Overall view of segmentations

254
Fig. 12.14 Segments II, III, IV, V, and VII
Q. Lu et al.
Fig. 12.15 Hypertrophy of segments V and VII, and contraction of
segments VI and VII
12.16, and 12.17) are deformed, as the branches of the por-
tal vein in adjacent liver tissue enlarge to compensate for the
deformations of the hepatic and portal veins caused by
stones. As a result, portal vein and hepatic veins deviate
from their normal paths, and are mostly deviated from the
traditional Couinaud segment. Liver atrophy and hypertrophy or liver transposition were observed. In this case, surgi-
Fig. 12.16 Overall view of s hepatic segments
Fig. 12.17 Stones at segments III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VII
cal resection, according to the traditional Couinaud
segmentation, will inevitably lead to uncertainty of the cutting edge, thus affecting the therapeutic effect. Therefore,
the preoperative 3D visualization of individualized liver

12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
255
segmentation in patients with hepatolithiasis has important
guiding signicance for the diagnosis and formulation of
surgical methods.
12.6.1 Semiautomatic Liver Segmentation
The reconstructed STL format was imported into the
FreeForm Modeling System. After smoothing and denoising,
the liver was translucent, and the individualized liver segmentation was performed according to the blood ow topological relationship (Fig.12.18). The liver segments of each
functional area were determined by the independent portal
vein blood supply and hepatic venous reux, and each segment of the liver was divided into different colors for
comparison.
12.6.2 Hepatic Segment forHepatolithiasis
Through 3D rotational observation of portal vein and hepatic
vein, the liver was divided into three, four, or even ve sections according to the branches of the hepatic vein. Then the
portal vein, biliary tract, and hepatic vein were registered to
observe the relationship between the portal vein and bile
duct branches in the hepatic veins (Figs.12.19, 12.20, 12.21,
12.22, 12.23, 12.24, 12.25, 12.26, 12.27, 12.28, 12.29, and
12.30). The segments were marked with different colors
(Figs.12.10, 12.11, 12.12, 12.13, 12.14, 12.15, 12.16, and
12.17) to complete the individualized liver segmentation.
The color of each segment was hidden or transparent to some
degree. The stones and bile ducts were displayed separately
or simultaneously. The distribution of stones and bile duct
lesions in each hepatic segment can be clearly observed by
rotating observation at different angles (Figs.12.31, 12.32,
12.33, 12.34, 12.35, and 12.36). The precise localization
diagnosis of stones and bile duct lesions can be made.
The main factors to be considered comprehensively during surgery include the following aspects: the blood supply
system (hepatic artery and portal vein) of the site to be
resected, the reux system (hepatic vein) of the remaining
liver, and the remaining liver volume. The 3D reconstruction
image can observe the blood supply artery, portal vein, and
reuxing hepatic vein of the site to be resected and measure
the distance between it and the secondary branch and tertiary
branch of the hepatic artery and portal vein. Therefore,
whether the surgical procedure is regular hepatic segment
hepatectomy or irregular hepatectomy, and whether residual
hepatic vein reux is affected, can be determined. 3D reconstruction images showed the branches of the portal vein and
hepatic artery at more than three levels and clearly showed
the 3D morphology of three sets of the vascular system in the
liver, and their spatial anatomical relationship with the site to
be excised. Individualized liver segmentation and volume
measurement are ensured. Based on the principle of
Couinaud segmentation, the 3D visualized liver segmentation function was adopted, which accords with the anatomical characteristics of the individualized portal vein. It can
accurately locate the liver segment where the stone is located,
as well as calculate the volume of the whole liver, the liver
segment where the stone is located, and the residual liver
segment; thus providing an accurate basis for the evaluation
of liver volume.
12.7 Clinical Diagnosis ofHepatolithiasis
with3D Visualization
Appropriate disease classication can not only reect the
anatomical features and pathophysiological changes of diseases but also guide the treatment. The main pathological
features of hepatolithiasis are biliary obstruction, infection,
destruction, and proliferation of hepatic parenchyma. Due to
the dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct, thickening of the
wall, proliferation of brous tissue, and massive inltration
of inammatory cells, the portal vein branches are compressed, distorted, narrowed, blood ow is decreased and the
corresponding hepatic parenchyma atrophied. The compensatory hypertrophy of normal liver tissue forms liver atrophyhypertrophy syndrome. Moreover, cholestasis can also cause
complications such as biliary tract infection, biliary liver
abscess, acute suppurative cholangitis, subphrenic abscess,
biliary stula, and biliary bleeding. The above pathological
changes and the location of the stones and diseased bile ducts
have become the main considerations for the classication of
hepatolithiasis.
In the past, hepatolithiasis classication was based on
stone component classication, Nakayama classication,
and Tsunoda classication. In 2007, the Biliary Surgery
branch of the Chinese Medical Association formulated and
issued “Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of
Hepatolithiasis” (2007), In the guideline, based on (a) the
clinical manifestation of the patient as well as conditions
such as the distribution of stones in the liver, (b) the degree
of pathological changes of the corresponding hepatic duct
and liver, and (c) the complication of extrahepatic bile duct
stones, hepatolithiasis was divided into two main types: type
I and type II.Type I is called regional type, with stones localized in one or several segments along the intrahepatic bile
duct tree, often accompanied by stenosis of the hepatic duct
and atrophy of the affected segments; Type II was divided
into three subtypes according to the hepatic parenchyma
lesions: type II a: diffuse type, without obvious brosis and
atrophy of the hepatic parenchyma. Type II b: diffuse type
with regional brosis and atrophy of the hepatic parenchyma,
usually accompanied by stenosis of the main hepatic duct in

256
Q. Lu et al.
ab
cd
e
Fig. 12.18 Individualized liver segmentation. (a) Individualized
hepatic segments (segment 5); (b) individualized hepatic segments
(segment 7); the arrow points to segment 1; (c) individualized hepatic
segments (segment 8); (d) individualized hepatic segments (segment 9);
(e) individualized hepatic segments (segment 10)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
