Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
75 Мб
Скачать
ab
3 Imaging ofCommon Biliary Tract Diseases
73
c
d
Fig. 3.50 Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (a) On plain CT scan, patchy low-density shadow is seen in the right lobe of the liver, with uneven internal density, unclear boundary, and inwardly sunken local liver capsule. (b) Only slight enhancement is seen in the arterial phase of enhanced scan; (c) The enhancement in portal phase is higher than
that in arterial phase, the internal structure and boundary of the lesion are relatively clear, and the perfusion of peripheral liver parenchyma is increased. (d) The enhancement of lesions in the delayed phase is fur­ther increased
It is generally believed that the portal vein is less involved in ICC.Studies have shown that ICC invades portal vessels, nerves, and lymphatic vessels. When the portal vein is invaded, the periportal sheath is thickened and the lumen is narrowed. However, tumor thrombus is uncommon, and occasionally a sectionally or foliate hypoperfusion area is visible.
3.4.7.2 MRI Findings (Figs.3.51 and3.52).
Plain Scan It showed hypointense on T1WI and iso- and hyperintense on T2WI.Signal strength correlated with the composition of intra-tumoral components such as brous tis­sue, mucus, and necrotic tissue. With the presence of many brous tissues, the lesions on the T2WI presented iso- or hypointense, otherwise, they would present hyperintense.
74
ab
cd
ef
X. Quan et al.
Fig. 3.51 MRI ndings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (a, b) T1WI and T2WI show long T1 and T2 signals with clear boundary in the left lobe of the liver. (c) The enhancement of lesions in arterial phase is not obvious by contrast-enhanced scan; (d) The edge of the lesion at
the portal vein stage shows garland-like enhancement; (e) The scope of enhancement in the delayed phase is further increased; (f) Hepatobiliary specic lesions shows low signal and slightly high signal in the center of lesions
ab
3 Imaging ofCommon Biliary Tract Diseases
c d
75
Fig. 3.52 MRI ndings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (a) Abnormal signal shadow of T1 with slightly longer blade shape on the right liver, with unclear boundary and local depression of liver capsule; (b) Abnormal signal shadow of T2 with slightly longer blade shape on the right liver, and the intrahepatic bile duct is signicantly dilated; (c) Multiple dilated bile ducts can be seen in the lesion in the coronal posi-
However, the hypointense on T2WI did not only indicate the composition of brous tissue, but also coagulative necrosis. There was no capsule shadow around the lesion. Fiber trac­tion can cause local depression of the liver capsule around
tion of T2WI. (d) The hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI scans in the coronal plane shows that the overall focus of the lesion does not take up liver-specic contrast agents, mild enhancement is observed in some parts, and multiple metastases can be seen in the liver, showing a clearer image than T2WI, which is helpful to determine the nature of the lesion
specic contrast agent was applied, most of the lesions were not inltrated, and band-like and small patchy lesions with slightly hyperintense (representing delayed enhancement, not inltration) could be observed (Cheng etal. 2020).
the lesion.
MRCP This can display the whole picture of intrahepatic
Enhanced Scan Typical manifestations were similar to
those of CT.When ICC contained a large number of tumor cells and only a few ber components, the whole tumor was signicantly enhanced in the arterial phase, but the enhance­ment still continued until the portal phase and the delayed phase. It is worth mentioning that when the hepatocyte-
bile duct tree, the location and extent of tumor obstruction. It can show intra-tumoral bile duct dilatation and proximal bile duct stenosis, as well as the invasion and compression of extrahepatic bile duct by hilar lymph node metastasis. However, the denition of MRCP is usually inferior to that of direct cholangiocarcinoma.
76
X. Quan et al.
3.4.7.3 Special Manifestations
• Mucinous cholangiocarcinoma produces abundant vis-
cous mucin, and the dilated bile duct can also be seen in
the lesion. In MRI plain scan, the lesion presents obvious
hyperintense on T2WI.Very few ICCs destroyed the bile
duct, forming an intratumor bile lake.
• ICC can be associated with intrahepatic infection, espe-
cially when it is complicated with liver abscess. The clini-
cal and imaging manifestations of liver abscess may cover
up the signs of ICC, resulting in misinterpretation leading
to misdiagnosis. When the inner edge of the abscess wall
is not smooth and there is a small wall nodule or when the
peripheral edema zone with low-density does not match
with the routine changes of the liver abscess, the clinician
should be alert to possibility of liver abscess combined
with ICC.
• ICC has varied enhancement patterns in contrast-
enhanced CT scans: Non-enhanced: The lesion usually
has a relatively clear boundary and is surrounded by an
abnormal perfusion area. The adjacent bile duct is dilated,
and the lesion may have no obvious enhancement because
of the vast necrotic area inside, resulting in partial
coagulation. Ring-shaped enhancement: It is particularly
important to distinguish it from the pseudocapsule when
the enhanced foci around the lesion resemble a thin ring-
shaped pattern. The range of peripherally ring-shaped
enhancement of ICC is usually increased in the portal and
delayed phases compared with the arterial phase; how-
ever, the pseudocapsule of HCC usually has a relatively
sharp boundary, presenting a continuous narrow
hypodense or delayed enhanced lesion; Enhancement in
the arterial phase and reduced enhancement in the portal
phase: Such ICC tissues have less necrosis and less
brous components. The tumor cells are relatively abun-
dant, and there is no pseudocapsule on the periphery of
the tumor (Fig.3.53).

3.4.8 Periampullary Carcinoma

The ampulla is located in the medial aspect of the descend­ing portion of the duodenum and is the bulging part of the duodenal papilla. Circularly arranged smooth muscle around the ampulla of Vater forms the sphincter of Oddi. The ampulla region includes the ampulla of Vater, sphincter of Oddi, distal common bile duct, duodenal papilla, and head of the pancreas. Because of their close proximity to each other, the clinical manifestations of a heterogeneous group of neo­plasms arising from these areas are characterized by progres­sive obstructive jaundice, and the treatment options for them are similar. Therefore, they are collectively referred to as periampullary carcinoma.
The clinical symptoms of periampullary carcinoma include various manifestations induced by obstructive
jaundice, such as yellow staining of the skin and sclera, itch­ing of the skin, clay-colored stools, dark urine, and loss of appetite. Severe periampullary carcinoma can progress to weight loss and anemia. Periampullary carcinoma can be caused by cancer necrosis and hemorrhage, and patients may test positive for fecal occult blood.
3.4.8.1 Radiographic Findings
Periampullary carcinoma mainly manifests at imaging as nodules in the ampulla, extensive dilation of the proximal bile duct, and dilatation of main pancreatic duct. The specic manifestations are as follows:
3.4.8.2 CT Findings
CT showed stenosis and truncation of the lower segment of the common bile duct and thickening of the bile duct wall. An enhancing mass could be observed on contrast-enhanced scan. Adenocarcinoma of the descending duodenum was demonstrated with thickening and stiffness of the duodenal wall. Papillary carcinoma was characterized by bulging of duodenal papillae and tumor masses projecting into the intestinal cavity (Chong etal. 2012).
3.4.8.3 MRI Findings
On T1WI, the distal end of the common bile duct shows iso­or hypointense nodules, while on T2WI, iso- or slightly hyperintense nodules are predominant. Delayed enhance­ment is common in contrast-enhanced scans. MRCP shows a smooth stricture in the distal CBD with gradual tapering or more abrupt narrowing, often associated with dilatation of the pancreatic duct, resulting in the “double-duct sign.” The “double duct sign” is suggestive of the tumor location. The source images show lling defects at the distal CBD end (Fig.3.54).

3.4.9 Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare variant of Primary Liver Cancer (PLC), with a vari­ably reported incidence between 0.4% and 14.2% in differ­ent regions (Jarnagin etal. 2002; Yano etal. 2003; Liu etal.
2003; Ng etal. 1998; Kim etal. 2014). A denite histopatho-
logical diagnosis of cHCC-CC requires the presence of unequivocally mixed components of both hepatocellular car­cinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, in the tumor. The patho­genesis of this rare cancer remains unclear, its preoperative diagnosis is difcult, and its prognosis is dismal. The clinical presentations of cHCC-CC are non-specic, and a wide array of symptoms include epigastric pain or discomfort. It has clinical features in common with hepatocellular carci­noma and cholangiocarcinoma, which involve strong male predominance. A number of studies conducted in China have
ab
3 Imaging ofCommon Biliary Tract Diseases
d
c
77
e
Fig. 3.53 MRI ndings of cholangiocarcinoma of the left lobe of the liver. (a, b) Round long T1 abnormal signal shadow in the left hepatic lobe; no signicant changes in T1WI OP and IP signals; (c) The lesions on T2WI show high signal and dilated small bile duct shadow can be seen in the lesions. (d) MRCP shows partial intrahepatic bile duct trun-
f
cation and slight dilation of distal intrahepatic bile duct. (e) Heterogeneous enhancement of lesions during arterial phase in the enhanced scan; (f) The enhancement in the portal phase is weaker than that of the arterial phase
78
ab
X. Quan et al.
c
d
e
f
Fig. 3.54 CT and MRI ndings of ampullary carcinoma. (a) In CT enhanced scanning of arterial MPR, soft tissue density nodules are observed in the ampulla, lesion enhancement is less uniform, and the upper bile duct is signicantly dilated. (b) The portal phase shows fur­ther enhancement of the lesion, and multiple metastases can be detected by scanning the liver and adjacent abdominal cavity; (c) On T1WI image, the lesion presents a low signal nodular shadow. (d) The coro-
nary lesion in T2WI shows slightly low-signal nodular shadow. The lower segment of the common bile duct tapers, and the main pancreatic duct is also signicantly dilated. (e) MRCP shows “soft rattan” dilata­tion of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile duct, as well as sig­nicant dilatation of the pancreatic duct. (f) Contrast-enhanced scan shows heterogeneous enhancement of lesions, thickening, and enhance­ment of adjacent bile duct wall
3 Imaging ofCommon Biliary Tract Diseases
79
demonstrated a similar patient prole including associated underlying cirrhosis and hepatitis B, as well as elevated serum levels of CA19-9 and AFP.
3.4.9.1 Imaging Findings
The imaging features of cHCC-CC are non-specic and gov­erned by the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma vs. cholangiocarcinoma. Each of the two components has its own characteristic imaging features. HCC presents a wash-in and wash-out contrast enhancement pattern and cholangio­carcinoma show a continuous enhancement. Pattern. MRI reaches a signicantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than CT in the detection of cHCC-CC.
3.4.9.2 MRI Findings
The cHCC-CC shows hypointense on T1WI.On T2WI, they appear relative hyperintense and the lesions are visualized as
a b
a heterogeneous mass, showing a mosaic pattern and hyper­intensity on diffusion-weighted images (DWI). Hepatocyte­specic contrast agents (gadoxetate disodium) are injected into the tumor for enhanced scanning. The arterial phase is markedly enhanced, and the clearance of portal phase and delayed phase is low, showing a slow wash-in and wash-out pattern. The enhancement of pseudo-capsule is also observed. The central part of the hepatobiliary special phase shows an obvious high signal and peripheral low signal (target sign). In the hepatobiliary phase, the two components can express their histological characteristics more signicantly. The higher the proportion of the CC component in cHCC-CC, the more abundant brous stroma and more obvious the target sign in the hepatobiliary phase. Target sign has high signi­cance for the preoperative diagnosis of cHCC-CC (Figs.3.55 and 3.56).
c
Fig. 3.55 MRI ndings of cHCC-CC. (a) Patchy short T2 signal is observed in the lesion at the right posterior lobe of the liver. (b) Delayed enhancement in hepatobiliary specic phase; (c) (color) The tumor tis-
sue consists of a nested hepatocellular carcinoma (white arrow) and an adenotubular cholangiocellular carcinoma (black arrow)
80
ab
c
d
X. Quan et al.
e
Fig. 3.56 cHCC-CC in the right posterior lobe. (a) Contrast-enhanced scan shows that early arterial enhancement is not evident in the lesion at the upper right posterior lobe; (b) Signicant peripheral enhance­ment in late arterial phase; (c) Central delayed enhancement at portal venous and equilibrium phases, and peripheral enhancement clearance;
(d) Equilibrium period with false envelop sign (White arrow); (e) The central enhancement of hepatobiliary specic period is more obvious than before, and the peripheral portion without Gd-EOB-DTPA intake shows lower signal, forming the target sign
3 Imaging ofCommon Biliary Tract Diseases
81
3.5 CT andMRI Diagnosis ofObstructive Jaundice
Obstructive jaundice is caused by mechanical obstruction of bile capillaries, the canaliculi, the left and right hepatic ducts, common hepatic duct, or the common bile duct. It can be divided into intrahepatic and extrahepatic obstructive jaun­dice according to the location. The extrahepatic obstructive jaundice generally requires surgical intervention, and most intrahepatic obstructive jaundice is treated with medical therapy. Therefore, differentiating the location and underly­ing cause of obstructive jaundice is of high signicance for clinical treatment (Singh etal. 2014). The diagnostic proce­dures of CT and MRI for obstructive jaundice and issues to be solved include:
• Diagnosis of extrahepatic obstructive jaundice.
• Denition of the obstruction plane.
• Identication of benign and malignant obstruction.
• Histological diagnosis of etiology.
3.5.1 CT andMRI Signs ofExtrahepatic Biliary Obstruction
3.5.1.1 Intrahepatic Biliary Dilatation
CT Findings
Normally, intrahepatic bile ducts above the third branches cannot be displayed on either conventional or high- resolution CT scans. Visualization of smaller bile ducts within the liver always indicates dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct. When obstructive jaundice occurs, the intrahepatic bile ducts are generally dilated and taper at the hilum, showing water dense tubular branching structures with clear boundaries. Contrast-enhanced scan is important for showing intrahe­patic bile duct dilatation. The dilated bile duct runs parallel to the adjacent enhanced portal vein (Fig.3.57).
MRI Findings
The SE sequence of conventional MRI shows hypointense on T1WI hepatic duct and hypertense on T2WI.Normally, T2WI shows left and right hepatic ducts and their 1–2 branches; T1WI is inferior to T2WI in displaying normal hepatic ducts, but enhanced T1WI is helpful in showing dilated intrahepatic bile ducts. The intrahepatic bile ducts typically run parallel to the adjacent portal vein, and its nor­mal diameters range from 2mm to 3mm or 1/3 of the diam­eter of the accompanying portal vein. Most of the bile ducts in the periphery of the liver cannot be displayed. It is gener­ally believed that when the diameter of the left and right hepatic ducts is greater than or equal to 5mm or their diam-
eters are similar to that of the accompanying portal vein, abnormal dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct can be diagnosed. MRCP shows that the normal intrahepatic bile duct exhibits a dendritic distribution and the tributaries form the right and left hepatic ducts. The fusion of the right and left hepatic ducts forms the common hepatic duct. When the intrahepatic bile duct is dilated, MRCP shows the dilated bile duct with hyperintense extending from the liver hilum to the liver periphery, in multiple directions (Figs.3.58 and 3.59).
3.5.1.2 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Dilatation
The common hepatic duct and the common bile duct are col­lectively called extrahepatic bile ducts. The normal extrahe­patic bile duct has a slender spindle shape on the coronal image, which means the diameter of the middle portion of the extrahepatic bile duct is slightly larger than that of the upper and lower portions. Extrahepatic bile duct dilatation can be conrmed when the diameter of the normal extrahe­patic bile duct is less than 6mm, or the diameter of extrahe­patic bile duct is equal to or larger than the diameter of portal vein parallel with it. If the diameter of extrahepatic bile duct is 7–9 mm, the obstruction should be judged comprehen­sively according to clinical manifestations. For example, for patients undergoing cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis, the bile duct can maintain a certain degree of dilation, generally less than 10mm, but the clinical biochemical examination has no signs of obstructive jaundice; dilatation of extrahe­patic bile duct was considered only when the diameter was larger than 9mm in patients without cholecystectomy and above 60years old; while for patients without cholecystec­tomy and below 60years old, the clinician must be alert for biliary obstruction when the diameter of extrahepatic bile duct is more than 7mm.
Extrahepatic bile duct dilatation appears as a circular water-like hypodensity ring on CT, and the disappearance of the annular shadow is toward the end of the dilated bile duct, indicating the location of biliary obstruction (Fig.3.60).
Extrahepatic bile duct dilatation shows a circular water­like long T1 and long T2 on the axis of MRI, and the diam­eter of the tube is increased (Fig.3.61).
3.5.2 Signs ofCT andMRI forDetermining
theObstruction Plane
Extrahepatic bile duct obstruction is horizontally divided into four segments: hilar segment (left and right hepatic ducts and common hepatic duct), superior segment of the pancreas, the pancreatic head, and the ampulla segment. The location of obstruction can be determined by observing the anatomical structure around the end of the dilated extrahe­patic bile duct.
82
ab
X. Quan et al.
c
e
d
f
Fig. 3.57 CT ndings of normal intrahepatic bile duct and extrahe­patic obstructive jaundice. (a) Non-contrast CT scan shows normal manifestations of intrahepatic bile duct, but does not show intrahepatic bile duct; (b) CT enhanced scan shows normal manifestations of intra-
hepatic bile duct, but normal did not show intrahepatic bile duct; (c, d) Plain CT scan shows intrahepatic bile duct dilatation; (e ~ f) CT enhanced scan shows intrahepatic bile duct dilatation