Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
75 Мб
Скачать
11 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofExtrahepatic Cholelithiasis
237
a
b
Fig. 11.12 3D visualized simulation surgery—simulating the process of suture of bile duct and indwelling of T-tube. (a) Introduce the suture needle to suture the common bile duct; (b) suture the common bile duct; (c) suture of the common bile duct incision
238
Y. Tang et al.
c
Fig. 11.12 (continued)

References

Fan Y, Fang C, Zhu X.Clinical application of three-dimensional imag-
ing of 64-slices spiral CT cholangiography in pathological diagno-
sis of hepatolithiasis. Chin J Dig Surg. 2007;6(6):428–32. Fasel JH, Schenk A.Concepts for liver segment classication: neither
old ones nor new ones, but a comprehensive one. J Clin Imaging
Sci. 2013;3:48. https://doi.org/10.4103/2156- 7514.120803. Fasel JHD, Muster M, Gailloud P, Mentha G, Terrier F. Duplicated
hepatic artery: radiologic and surgical implications. Acta Anat.
1996;157:164–8.
Fasel JH, Majno PE, Peitgen HO.Liver segments: an anatomical ratio-
nale for explaining inconsistencies with Couinaud’s eight-segment concept. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:761–5.
Giadás T, Octavio de Toledo L, Asensio M, etal. Helical CT cholan-
giography in the evaluation of the biliary tract: application to the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27:61–70.
Peng W, Chen G, Zhao L, etal. MSCT virtual endoscopy: primary clini-
cal applications in the detection of biliary calculus. J Jiangsu Univ (Medical Edition). 2005;015(002):124–5.
Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
QipingLu, JianYang, PingWang, JunLiu, YingfangFan, andChihuaFang
12

12.1 Introduction

Hepatolithiasis refers to stones that originated from the intra­hepatic biliary system, which can exist alone or coexist with extrahepatic bile duct stones. As a common biliary tract dis­ease that is difcult to treat, hepatolithiasis is characterized by slow progress and severe consequence. When the hepato­biliary system suffers from progressive damage caused by diffuse stone obstruction and recurrent cholangitis, it can lead to severe complications such as biliary cirrhosis and portal hypertension, cholangiocarcinoma, liver failure, and eventually to the nal stage of biliary disease. It has become the most challenging problem in hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation and is an important cause of death in benign biliary tract diseases in China.
Since the 1950s, Professor Zhiqiang Huang has organized domestic specialists to perform researches on the diagnosis and management of hepatolithiasis from various perspec­tives. Based on the clinical and pathological studies of a large number of cases, it is recognized that intrahepatic chol­angiolithiasis is a strict intrahepatic segmental lesion. In the pathological range, the liver tissue has the corresponding pathology such as brosis, atrophy, and loss of function
Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this chapter (https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 33- 6769- 2_12) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Q. Lu General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China
J. Yang · Y. Fan · C. Fang ( Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
P. Wang First Afliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
J. Liu Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
*)
(Huang 2014). In 1957, regular hepatectomy to treat hepato­lithiasis was initiated by prof. Zhiqiang Huang; later on, the principle of “relieving the obstruction, removing lesions and building unobstructed drainage” was described (1959). This principle has laid the foundation for the surgical treatment of hepatolithiasis. In 1983, The Biliary Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association established the denition, nomenclature, and diagnostic criteria for hepatolithiasis; and the diagnostic criteria for acute obstructive suppurative chol­angitis and standards for marking stone sites were formu­lated. In the 1980s and 1990s, at the time when information technology was still relatively backward, two clinical epide­miological investigations of cholelithiasis were organized. According to 357 cases of hepatectomy and postoperative follow-up in Southwest Hospital, the signicance of hepato­lithiasis and stricture in reoperation of the biliary tract was analyzed (Huang 2014). It was rst pointed out that the residual hepatolithiasis and the stricture of the hepatobiliary duct are the most common and main reasons for the failure of surgical treatment for hepatolithiasis in China; it can cause hyperplasia and atrophy, complicate design, and further increase the difculty and risk of reoperation of biliary tract surgery. Therefore, various innovative surgical methods of portal cholangiojejunostomy have been developed. Since then, with the continuous improvement of liver surgery tech­nology and medical technology, hepatectomy in the treat­ment of hepatolithiasis has progressed. Studies on hepatobiliary perfusion, especially microcirculation, causes, and control of biliary bleeding, surgical treatment of end­stage biliary diseases have also steadily deepened under­standing. Systematic studies on the principles and methods of surgical treatment for benign biliary diseases such as hep­atolithiasis, and the application of a series of surgical meth­ods such as hepatectomy and repair of high bile duct stricture, have greatly improved treatment outcomes. These researches have promoted the diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithia­sis. Because of their contribution to research on hepatolithia­sis, the team of Academician Huang Zhiqiang won the rst prize of The Millennial National Science and Technology
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 C. Fang, W. Y. Lau (eds.), Biliary Tract Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6769-2_12
239
240
Q. Lu et al.
Progress Awards. In 2007, the Department of Biliary surgery of the Chinese Medical Association organized and published the “Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatolithiasis.” In 2013, the expert consensus on the lapa­roscopic treatment of hepatolithiasis was formulated and published by the Committee of minimally invasive Surgeons of the Chinese Physicians Association, which further pro­moted the standardized diagnosis and treatment of hepatoli­thiasis in China.
Despite the consensus on treatment, not every hospital can have the well-developed infrastructure, clinical, surgical, and technical expertise required for the effective diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis. The main reason is that although the imaging evaluation of hepatolithiasis has devel­oped considerably, some deciencies remain. B-ultrasound, CT, and MRI have their advantages in the diagnosis of hepa­tolithiasis, but their shortcomings are obvious. B-ultrasound can detect dilated biliary tract and calculi; however, it is chal­lenging to show the location of bile duct stenosis due to many factors and poor image quality. CT and MRI can com­prehensively display the distribution of hepatolithiasis, dila­tation of bile duct system, and pathological changes of the hepatic parenchyma, but both of them are two-dimensional tomographic black-and-white images. Generally, it is dif­cult to show the location of biliary stricture directly, nor can we nd stones with similar density to hepatic parenchyma. Thus, an experienced specialist is required to continuously observe the CT images of each period to form a complete stereoscopic image. Invasive direct biliary imaging examina­tions such as ERCP and PTC have the risk of inducing com­plications such as acute cholangitis; and they cannot observe the pathological changes in the intrahepatic bile duct above the narrowed bile duct segment and the extrahepatic bile duct; nor the relationship between the vessels. The analysis and judgment of hepatolithiasis need to be combined with other examination methods. In particular, the above methods displayed two-dimensional images unsuitable for objective 3D visualized imaging. It is difcult to accurately visualize the liver tissue section with narrowed hepatobiliary duct lesions that need to be resected invivo, and adjacent relation­ships with the surrounding vessels before the operation. In the past, the understanding of the inter-relationship between intrahepatic blood vessels and bile duct was mainly obtained from the study of the vascular casts of autopsy specimens. Although representing the basic situation, this method can­not fully reect the personalized characteristic of the living body because it is derived from corpses. Surgeons’ judgment and surgical planning are based on the subjective and com­prehensive conception of the spatial position of the tissues and organs, which presents great ambiguity and uncertainty. For complex hepatolithiasis, especially when associated with high bile duct stricture, or/and atrophic hyperplasia syn­drome; the accurate grasp of variations of the biliary system,
portal vein, hepatic artery, and hepatic vein, as well as the anatomic relationship between them, intrahepatic stones and narrow biliary ducts; has decisive signicance in formulating the surgical planning for conventional hepatectomy.
Therefore, the high uncertainty of the complicated condi­tion of hepatolithiasis before the operation and insufcient evaluation, limits the effective implementation of radical therapy. As Prof. Dong etal. (2017) said, “Due to the limita­tions of theory and technology in the past, it was difcult to remove the benign lesions and malignant tumors involving the intrahepatic bile duct and liver parenchyma entirely, thus the cure of disease could not be achieved. The effect of sur­gery only remains at the level of ‘relieving symptoms’. Surgical treatment of intrahepatic bile duct lesions is a century- long challenge in the eld of abdominal surgery.”
In the twenty-rst century, the world has entered a new era of biological intelligence information with the rapid development of digital technology. The integration of sur­gery, anatomy, imaging, computer technology, and digital information engineering technology; which has promoted the emergence of 3D visualization technology of hepatoli­thiasis. In the past 10years, the clinical practice in many hos­pitals has fully conrmed the unique and superior technical guidance and support role of 3D visualization technology in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis, which can help surgeons to achieve the “cure effect” (Fang etal. 2013). In January 2017, “Expert consensus on precise diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis guided by 3D visualization technology,” jointly formulated by the Digital Medical Branch of the Chinese Medical Association and the Digital Medicine Clinical Surgery Committee of the Chinese Research Hospitals, was ofcially released, indicating that it has become a mature and advanced medical technology that can be popularized and standardized in China. This chapter focuses on the application of 3D visualization technology in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis.
12.2 Preoperative Imaging
ofHepatolithiasis
The formulation of a reasonable surgical approach requires an accurate preoperative diagnosis. The basis of preoperative treatment planning for hepatolithiasis mainly includes imag­ing diagnosis, evaluation of liver physiological reserve func­tion, and judgment of the patient’s general condition. Among them, imaging diagnosis is the most critical, which is crucial to the formulation of surgical plans and surgical effects.
Currently, the main imaging techniques for the diagnosis of hepatolithiasis include B-ultrasound, CT, MRI, ERCP, PTC, postoperative biliary drainage tube angiography, and choledochoscopy. However, each of them has its own advan­tages and limitations, so it is difcult to obtain a comprehen-
12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
241
sive diagnosis by a single examination. Thus, the combination of more than one imaging examination is often required to achieve the purpose of correct diagnosis.

12.2.1 Imaging

Ultrasound examination has great value in the diagnosis of hepatolithiasis. Featured as noninvasive, inexpensive, and repeatable, B-ultrasound, suitable for the screening of stones, is the simplest initial diagnostic modality and it can show hepatolithiasis and bile duct dilatation. Stones present as echogenic spots with an acoustic shadow behind them. Calcication of the intrahepatic duct system also shows stone-like imaging, so the diagnosis of hepatolithiasis can usually be made when marked bile duct dilatation peripheral to the stones is seen (Sakpal etal. 2009). B-ultrasound is also valuable in the localization diagnosis of hepatic abscess and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma caused by hepatolithiasis; however, the imaging effect on the latter is not as good as that of CT and MRI. B-ultrasound has a high diagnostic value for hepatolithiasis falling off to the common hepatic duct and common bile duct. The main disadvantage is that an overall image of the biliary tree cannot be adequately pro­vided and B-ultrasound is not as intuitive as CT and MRI, especially, less sensitive for hepatic parenchyma lesions (usually hepatic brosis) caused by biliary stricture and hep­atolithiasis and for biliary stricture lesions. B-ultrasound is dependent on the prociency of the operator. Therefore, although it can be considered as the preferred primary exam­ination in general, other imaging examinations are still nec­essary to determine the condition before surgical treatment.
The sensitivity and accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of hepatolithiasis are higher than those of B-ultrasound. CT can show the location of hepatic hilum, dilatation of bile duct, as well as hypertrophy and atrophy of the liver. By systemati­cally observing all levels, we can understand the distribution of stones in the intrahepatic bile duct and the pathological changes of liver parenchyma. CT plain scan can show high­density calculi, which are displayed as a corded, round, and nodular shape in the course of the intrahepatic bile duct. Its CT value varies according to the composition and calcium content of the calculi. Generally speaking, high calcium con­tent calculi have high CT value, which can clearly show the calculi shadow, while calculi with equal density and low­density display poorly because of low calcium content. CT plain scan has some limitations in the diagnosis of complica­tions of hepatolithiasis, such as hepatic abscess and intrahe­patic cholangiocarcinoma. Both showed homogeneous or heterogeneous low-density lesions. Enhanced CT scan can be used as a supplement to CT plain scan in the diagnosis of hepatolithiasis and its complications. It can better reveal the location of stones, whether the adjacent wall is thickened or
not, and whether the distal bile duct is dilated. The latter can be manifested as a strip-like branched low-density shadow parallel to the enhanced portal vein. Isodense calculi in the dilated intrahepatic bile ducts show no enhancement of strip­like or spot-like isodense shadow. The distal bile ducts are slightly dilated, which is difcult to discern on CT.It is nec­essary to make a repeated observation of thin-layer CT enhanced scanning and carefully measure whether the CT value of plain scan and contrast-enhanced CT is increasing or not, and whether the lesions are enhanced or not, so that the diagnosis can be conrmed. Primarily because of the characteristics of low pressure in the bile duct, it is difcult to display the bile duct directly by the contrast medium, which is rare or through the vascular pathway. The two­dimensional CT image is always the bottleneck in the spatial diagnosis of the stone and the stricture of the bile duct. In general, it is difcult to display the location of biliary stric­ture directly, so it cannot completely cover the distribution of stones, location of bile duct stricture, location of bile duct stenosis, and display of bile duct tree. 3D reconstruction of the bile duct can also be carried out by the CT image post­processing workstation. However, the 3D reconstruction images obtained are only the images of a particular vascular phase. Clinicians can only be provided with 2D at lms, not the true 3D images, with which is challenging to visualize the stereoscopic relationship between the third stage blood vessel and the liver and bile duct tree simultaneously. The typical “honeycomb sign” can be observed by CT enhance­ment in the diagnosis of hepatic abscess complicated with hepatolithiasis. Separation enhancement is most evident in the arterial phase, and the degree of enhancement decreases in the portal vein phase and delayed phase. The degree of enhancement of the delayed period decreased; peripheral inammation and congestion produced a noticeably patchy enhancement in the arterial phase, and various atypical man­ifestations may occur during the delayed phase, which are difcult to diagnose. Complicated cholangiocarcinoma may present various solid, cystic, and solid lesions, often accom­panied by distally dilated intrahepatic bile duct and enlarged hilar lymph nodes, but often without specicity, which needs to be evaluated in conjunction with other examinations.
On Plain MRI, T1- and T2-weighted images can show hepatolithiasis, mostly strip, round, nodular low signal, or no signal shadow. According to the different components of the stone, T1-weighted can be a low signal, iso-signal, or hyperintense, and the signal value of the calcium-containing stone is low. On MRI plain scan, the shape of bile duct dila­tion can also be observed at the distal end of the stone, which is shown as long strip T1 and long T2 signal. The diagnosis of hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis can also be conrmed by MRI plain scan. The most signicant advantage of MRI combined with MRCP is that it can dis­play the intrahepatic bile duct tree in multiple directions and
242
Q. Lu et al.
accurately judge the distribution of intrahepatic stones, the location and extent of biliary stenosis and dilation as well as liver parenchymal lesions. The limitation of MRI is that its spatial resolution is not as good as that of CT. On the T2-weighted image, the signal of bile is long, and the abnor­mal signal of small stones is easily “submerged.” MRI is not as clear as CT and B-ultrasound in showing calculi. On MRI, small stones are difcult to nd, and the stenosis of the bile duct is not as clear and accurate as the direct chol­angiography on MRI. 3D screenshots of CT and MRCP bili­ary system are not true 3D images, and it is difcult to simultaneously visualize the stereoscopic anatomy of the biliary system and other intrahepatic ducts, especially that of the portal vein system. During contrast-enhanced MRI scanning, although the arteries, portal vein, and hepatic parenchyma were enhanced in each phase, the stones were not enhanced, and the stones without enhancement were often difcult to discern. Therefore, contrast- enhanced MR imaging is mainly used in the diagnosis of complications of hepatolithiasis. For example, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging can help clearly display at a dis­tinct arterial phase not only images of multiple arterial, venous, and delayed phases, but also the “cluster sign” of hepatic abscess, as well as granulomatous wall and hyper­emia around it accompanied by hepatolithiasis. The internal structure of the complicated solid cholangiocarcinoma dif­fers from the “cluster sign” in showing as an irregular mass with delayed enhancement. There are cystic components between solid lesions, which serve to distinguish from the “cluster sign.”
Invasive direct biliary imaging examinations such as ERCP and PTC are valuable in the diagnosis and treatment of intrahepatic cholelithiasis, but they are not the rst choice because of the possibility of inducing complications such as acute cholangitis.

12.2.2 Other Auxiliary Examinations

12.2.2.1 Biliary Manometry
Biliary manometry can be used to determine whether bile excretion is normal. It is not of great clinical signicance in all scenarios involving intrahepatic cholelithiasis, however, for stones near the porta hepatis of the left and right hepatic ducts with bile duct stricture, the phenomenon of bile duct dilatation, bile retention, and increased bile duct pressure caused by inadequate bile excretion can be observed. At present, according to the condition of the disease, electronic
biliary manometry should be selected to accurately measure the pressure in the bile duct.
12.2.2.2 Cholescintigraphy
Technetium-99m (
99m
Tc) is commonly used in radionuclide scanning. After intravenous injection, it is absorbed by the mononuclear phagocyte system and excreted into the biliary tract. 3D images can be obtained by layering and xing points during scanning, and the relationship between the images and adjacent structures can be displayed, which pro­vides a good basis for diagnosis. However, the diagnosis of intrahepatic bile duct stones is not ideal.
12.2.2.3 Selective Celiac Arteriography
Selective celiac arteriography can be used to observe the presence of displacement, compression, interruption, and abnormal vascular shadows in the arteries. It is useful in the differential diagnosis of hepatobiliary and gallbladder cancer, but the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholelithiasis is not ideal. Moreover, arteriography requires specic equip­ment, complicated operation, and highly technical condi­tions, so it is not the rst choice for intrahepatic cholelithiasis.
In summary, various imaging examinations have their advantages and limitations in the diagnosis of hepatolithia­sis. Therefore, for complicated cases of hepatolithiasis, it is often necessary to evaluate them comprehensively in combi­nation with various examinations in order to obtain more objective diagnostic results and formulate surgical treatment strategies.
12.3 Acquisition ofHigh-Quality
Submillimeter CT Data
The emergence of digital medical technology, represented by 3D visualization of liver and biliary tract and 3D printing technology, provides a new method for accurate preoperative evaluation of hepatolithiasis.
3D visualization technology is based on multi-slice CT enhanced thin-layer scan data. For patients who are diag­nosed with hepatolithiasis by B-ultrasound and intended for establishment of a 3D visual model, the thin-section CT scanning technique is used to collect enhanced image data of the upper abdomen. The quality of the data in the plain, arte­rial, portal, and hepatic venous phases, directly affects the accuracy of the subsequent 3D visualization model of the hepatolithiasis.
12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
243

12.3.1 Collection Equipment

64-row spiral CT-PHILIPS Brilliance 64-, 256-, or 320-slice CT can be used. A MEDRAD double-barrel high-pressure syringe (USA) is adopted. The image post-processing work­station is the MxView workstation that comes with the PHILIPS Brilliance 64-slice spiral CT.Scanning parameters: voltage 120kV, current 300 mAs, rotation time 0.5s, pitch
0.984, and layer thickness 5mm.
12.3.2 Preparation forScanning
The patient is orally administered with 500–1000 ml of freshwater 20–30 min before the examination and another 500ml before scanning to ll the gastrointestinal tract (as a negative contrast agent). The patient is trained to breathe to maximize the control of artifacts caused by respiratory movement.

12.3.3 Plain Scan

High-resolution volumetric scanning in the submillimeter state. The patient is placed in a supine position with a routine scan in the direction of head to foot. The scanning range is from the top of diaphragm to the lower edge of the liver, and the scanning condition is 120kV, 300 mAs; 0.625×64 rows of detectors are combined, with 5mm of thickness, 5mm of interval, 0.984 of pitch, 0.5s of bulb rotation, 40–50cm of scanning eld of vision, 512×512 of matrix. A routine upper abdominal plain scan is performed.

12.3.4 Dynamic Enhanced CT Scan

After the plain scan, the contrast agent is injected into the cubital vein (with cannula needle), the injection rate is 5ml/s with a double tube CT high-pressure injector. The contrast agents are high concentration of Nonionic iodipin 370 (370 mgI/ml) or iopromide 370 (370 mgI/ml). At a dose of 1.5ml/ kg, the tube is washed with 50 ml of normal saline after injection of the contrast agent. The scanning conditions are the same as that of the plain scan. The scanning delay is 20~25s in the arterial phase and 50~55s in the intravenous
phase. After scanning, the enhanced raw data is applied to perform the thin layer reconstruction of 0.67 mm with an interval of 0.33mm, and the image data is transferred to the MxView workstation.
12.3.5 Acquisition ofThin-Slice CT Data
On the MxView diagnostic workstation, all the data is recorded by CD-ROM, including the data of liver and bile duct stones during plain scan phase, arterial phase, portal venous phase, and hepatic venous phase, all in the format of DICOM 3.0.
12.4 Reconstruction of3D Visualized
Model forHepatolithiasis
Thin-slice CT data are processed by image workstation and imported into MI-3DVS for program segmentation and reconstruction. By adjusting the transparency of the liver, the structure of the liver, hepatic artery, hepatic vein, and the pri­mary, secondary and tertiary branches of the portal vein are displayed, so do the stricture of the biliary tract and the dilated bile duct of the rst to fourth grade; the size, shape, and distribution of the stones are also displayed. Through the rotational observation of the model, the spatial position rela­tionship of each pipeline structure is clearly understood.

12.4.1 Image Registration

Adjust the scanning sequence of each phase. The original CT images are read with a DICOM viewer. These images are registered, converted into BMP format, and saved in a new folder (Fig. 12.1). In the MI-3DVS, the adaptive region growth algorithm is used to segment the liver sequence, and the 3D dynamic region growth method is used to perform automatic segmentation of the liver pipe­line system. It has the advantages of high speed and good accuracy and overcomes the shortcomings of manual seg­mentation. The segmented data can be reconstructed quickly by using the moving cube algorithm of surface rendering, which is benecial to the research of visual simulation surgery.
244
Q. Lu et al.
a
b
Fig. 12.1 Image registration. (a) CT images are read with a DICOM viewer; (b) images are converted and saved as BMP format les in the DICOM viewer; (c) BMP images of left intrahepatic bile duct stones
with atrophy; (d) BMP images of left intrahepatic bile duct dilatation and calculi
concretion
12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
245
c
Fig. 12.1 (continued)
in left liver
12.4.2 Image Automatic Segmentation and3D Reconstruction
The patient’s BMP data were imported into the MI-3DVS system. Then the 3D model was automatically segmented and reconstructed with the same method. Finally, the 3D model was output in STL format (Fig. 12.2a–h); the STL format of the model containing hepatolithiasis and liver sys­tems were imported into the FreeForm Modeling System to be processed and smoothed. The senses of layering and noise were also removed. A 3D model of each system (Fig.12.3a– h) and a hepatobiliary model was created (Fig.12.4).
The abdominal aorta and its branches, hepatic artery, and left hepatic artery, right hepatic artery, and its subordinate branches are all clearly displayed (Fig.12.3a).
• Portal vein phase: The main portal vein and grade 5
branches are well displayed. The splenic vein and supe-
rior mesenteric vein can be seen (Fig.12.3b).
• Hepatic vein phase: In the absence of hepatic atrophy and
cholangiocarcinoma, the main trunk of the hepatic vein
showed well. Normally, the branches of the hepatic vein
can be displayed. In this case, the left hepatic vein cannot
be clearly displayed due to the atrophy and deformation
of the left lateral lobe of the liver, resulting in the observed
variation of the left hepatic vein (Fig.12.3c).
• Bile duct dilatation of the left extrahepatic lobe can be
seen in the reconstructed biliary system (Fig.12.3d).
• Left intrahepatic cholelithiasis (Fig. 12.3e) can be seen
when the transparency of the bile duct is set at 25.
d
• The contour of the liver was clear, and the left lateral lobe was atrophied and deformed (Fig.12.3f).
The above method was the procedure for 3D reconstruc-
tion in the past. Now, an optimized 3D visualization system for abdominal medical images is used. In the process of 3D reconstruction, the software can directly read the original DICOM data of the patient (no format conversion is required) and then carry out automatic registration and system recon­struction, which has dramatically improved the working efciency.
12.5 3D Visualized Vascular Classication
The liver, biliary tract, stones, and intrahepatic blood ves­sels were observed and analyzed based on the obtained 3D visualized images of the individualized liver, vessels, stones, and peritoneal vessels, and surrounding organs. For patients without liver atrophy, hypertrophy or biliary cir­rhosis, 3D visualization of hepatic artery classication, and hepatic vein classication (see Sect. 16.3); 3D visual portal vein classication can be divided into the following 5 types.
12.5.1 Classication ofPortal Vein Branches
Normal Type The main portal vein was divided into left
and right branches at the porta hepatis (Fig.12.5).
246
Q. Lu et al.
a
b
Fig. 12.2 Automatic image segmentation. (a) BMP data are imported into the MI-3DVS for segmentation; (b) 3D reconstruction is performed in the MI-3DVS; (c) segmentation of the liver; (d) segmentation of left intrahepatic bile duct dilation; (e) segmentation of left intrahepatic bile
duct stones; (f) segmentation of the arterial system; (g) segmentation of the portal vein system; (h) segmentation of hepatic and inferior vena cava systems