Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword I
- •Foreword II
- •Foreword III
- •Foreword IV
- •Contributors
- •Manuscripts Translation and Preparation
- •1.1 Introduction
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •Deputy Editors
- •1.2.2.2 Gallbladder
- •1.2.2.3 Cystic Duct
- •1.2.2.4 Common Bile Duct
- •Supraduodenal Portion
- •Retroduodenal Portion
- •Pancreatic Portion
- •Intraduodenal Portion
- •1.3.2 Data Acquisition
- •1.3.2.2 Bile Duct Perfusion
- •1.3.2.3 Hepatic Artery Perfusion
- •1.3.2.4 Specimen Perfusion Fixation
- •1.4.1 Liver Dissection after Biliary Tract Perfusion
- •1.4.3.1 Image Registration After Bile Duct Perfusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Basic Principles
- •2.2.2.1 Methods
- •Preparation
- •Scanning Modalities
- •Contrast-Enhanced Scanning
- •Contrast-Enhanced Examination
- •Shaded Surface Display
- •Maximum Intensity Projection
- •Volume Rendering
- •2.3.1.1 MRI Devices
- •The Magnet
- •The Gradient System
- •The Radiofrequency System
- •Radiofrequency Coils
- •The Computer System
- •Other Auxiliary Equipment
- •2.3.2.1 MRI Preparations
- •Patient Preparation
- •2.3.2.2 Regular Scan Sequences
- •Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo Coronal Sequences
- •2D or 3D T2W1
- •Transaxial Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo Fat Suppression Sequences
- •Dynamic Enhancement Sequence
- •3D Volumetric Acquisitions
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •2D Continuous Thin-Slice Scanning
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •2D Thick-Slice Projection Imaging
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Congenital Biliary Diseases
- •3.2.1 Congenital Extrahepatic Biliary Atresia
- •3.2.1.1 CT Features
- •3.2.1.2 MRI Features
- •3.2.2 Biliary Dilatation
- •Type I
- •Type II
- •Type III
- •Type IV
- •Type V
- •3.2.2.2 Radiographic Features
- •CT Features
- •MRI Features
- •3.2.3 Bile Duct Hamartomas
- •3.2.3.1 CT Features
- •3.2.3.2 MRI Features
- •3.3 Common Gallbladder Diseases
- •3.3.1 Acute Cholecystitis
- •3.3.1.1 Radiographic Features
- •CT Features
- •MRI Features
- •Gangrenous Cholecystitis
- •Emphysematous Cholecystitis
- •Pediatric Cholecystitis
- •Pregnancy Cholecystitis
- •Gallbladder Empyema
- •Gallbladder Perforation
- •Hemorrhagic Cholecystitis
- •3.3.5 Other Gallbladder Tumors
- •3.3.5.3 Primary Gallbladder Lymphoma
- •3.3.5.4 Gallbladder Fibrosarcoma
- •3.3.6 Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis
- •3.3.6.1 CT Features
- •3.3.6.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.7 Gallbladder Adenomyomatosis
- •3.3.2 Chronic Cholecystitis
- •3.3.2.1 CT Features
- •3.3.2.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.3 Gallstones
- •3.3.3.1 CT Features
- •3.3.3.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.4 Gallbladder Cancer
- •3.3.4.1 CT Features
- •3.3.4.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.4.3 MRCP Features
- •3.3.7.1 CT Features
- •3.3.7.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.8.1 CT Features
- •3.3.9 Gallbladder Torsion
- •3.3.9.1 Type I
- •3.3.9.2 Type II
- •3.3.10.2 Gallbladder Sludge
- •3.3.11 Mirizzi’s Syndrome
- •3.3.11.1 CT Features
- •3.3.11.2 MRI Features
- •3.3.12 Post-Cholecystectomy Syndrome
- •3.4.1 Bile Duct Stones
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •3.4.2 Suppurative Cholangitis/Acute Cholangitis
- •3.4.3 Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
- •3.4.3.1 CT Findings
- •3.4.3.2 MRI Findings
- •3.4.4 Secondary Sclerotic Cholangitis
- •3.4.5 Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis
- •3.4.5.1 CT Findings
- •3.4.6 Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.6.1 CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •MRCP Features
- •3.4.7 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.7.3 Special Manifestations
- •3.4.8 Periampullary Carcinoma
- •3.4.8.1 Radiographic Findings
- •3.4.8.2 CT Findings
- •3.4.8.3 MRI Findings
- •3.4.9 Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma
- •3.4.9.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.9.2 MRI Findings
- •3.5.1.1 Intrahepatic Biliary Dilatation
- •CT Findings
- •MRI Findings
- •3.5.1.2 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Dilatation
- •3.5.2.1 Hilar Obstruction
- •3.5.2.3 Pancreatic Obstruction
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.2.1 CT Acquisition Protocols
- •4.1.2.2 Data Preprocessing
- •4.1.2.3 Medical Image Segmentation
- •4.1.2.4 3D Visualization
- •4.2.1 Image Registration
- •4.2.1.1 Template Matching Algorithm
- •4.2.1.2 Registration Steps
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •4.2.2 Image Segmentation
- •Pixel Based Methods
- •Region Based Methods
- •Edge Based Methods
- •Model Based Methods
- •4.2.2.3 Serialized Segmentation Model
- •4.2.2.4 Adaptive Region Growing Algorithm
- •4.2.3 3D Reconstruction
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •Fused Deposition Modeling
- •Stereolithography
- •Selected Laser Sintering
- •Direct Metal Laser Sintering
- •Laminated Object Manufacturing
- •Electron Beam Melting
- •Three-Dimensional Printing
- •High-Performance 3D Reconstruction Software
- •5.1.2.2 Medical Model Manufacturing
- •5.1.2.3 Tissue/Organ Regeneration
- •5.2.2 Digital Preparation
- •5.3.1.1 In Complex Liver Resection
- •5.3.1.2 In Liver Transplantation
- •5.3.2.1 In Cholangiocarcinoma Surgery
- •5.3.4 Prospects
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.1.1 Virtual Anatomy
- •6.1.2 Surgical Simulation
- •Improved Doctor–Patient Relationship
- •Reduced Surgical Costs
- •Remote Intervention
- •6.2 Virtual Surgical Instruments
- •6.2.1 Geometric Modeling
- •6.2.2 Motion Modeling
- •6.2.3 Physical Modeling
- •6.3 Surgical Simulation
- •6.3.1 The Hardware System
- •6.3.2 Software System
- •6.3.2.1 FreeForm Modeling System
- •6.3.2.2 Open Graphics Library
- •6.3.2.3 Tactile Development Kit
- •6.4.4 Discussion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Duodenoscopy
- •8.3 Choledochoscopy
- •8.3.1 Preoperative Application
- •8.3.2 Intraoperative Application
- •8.3.3 Postoperative Application
- •8.4 Capsule Endoscopy
- •8.5 Laparoscope
- •8.6 Endoscopic Ultrasound
- •8.7 3D Visualization-Assisted Endoscopic Technology
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.3.1.1 Arterial Phase
- •9.3.1.2 Portal Venous Phase
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1.2 Image Segmentation
- •10.2.1.3 3D Reconstruction
- •10.2.1.4 Surgical Simulation
- •Surgical Procedure
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.2 Image Registration
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1 Imaging
- •12.2.2 Other Auxiliary Examinations
- •12.2.2.1 Biliary Manometry
- •12.2.2.2 Cholescintigraphy
- •12.2.2.3 Selective Celiac Arteriography
- •12.3.1 Collection Equipment
- •12.3.3 Plain Scan
- •12.3.4 Dynamic Enhanced CT Scan
- •12.4.1 Image Registration
- •12.6.1 Semiautomatic Liver Segmentation
- •Surgical Procedures
- •Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.2 Anatomical or Regular Hepatectomy Guided by 3D Visualization
- •12.10.2.1 Indications
- •12.10.2.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.2.4 Surgical Procedures
- •For Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy
- •For Anatomical Left Hemihepatectomy
- •12.10.3.1 Contraindication
- •12.10.3.3 Surgical Procedures
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •12.10.4.1 Indications
- •12.10.4.2 Contraindication
- •12.10.4.4 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.4.5 Attention
- •12.10.5.1 Indications
- •12.10.5.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.5.3 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.5.4 Attention
- •12.10.6.1 Indications
- •12.10.6.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.6.3 Preoperative Imaging Evaluation
- •12.10.6.4 Surgical Procedures
- •12.10.6.5 Attention
- •12.10.7.1 Indications
- •12.10.7.2 Contraindications
- •12.10.7.3 Surgical procedures
- •12.10.7.4 Attention
- •12.10.8.1 Preoperative Evaluation
- •12.10.8.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •12.10.8.3 Contraindications
- •12.10.8.4 Operation Methods
- •12.10.8.5 Attention
- •12.10.9.1 Biliary Injury
- •Causes
- •Preventive Measures
- •12.10.9.2 Biliary Bleeding
- •12.10.9.3 Gastrointestinal Water Retention
- •Reasons
- •12.10.9.4 Biliary Leakage
- •12.11.1.1 Reasons
- •Main Reasons
- •Iatrogenic Biliary Tract Injury
- •Other Reasons
- •12.11.1.3 Surgical Procedures
- •Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy
- •Hepatectomy
- •Intrahepatic Lithotripsy Through Sinus Tract or PTCS
- •Severe Symptomatic Patients
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.3.1 Ultrasonography
- •13.3.2 Multi-Slice CT
- •13.3.5 Intraoperative Cholangiography
- •13.3.6 Radionuclide Hepatobiliary Scan
- •13.3.7 Digital Medicine Technology
- •Periampullary Tumor
- •Biliary Atresia
- •Acute Pancreatitis
- •Acute Cholecystitis
- •Hepatic Cyst
- •Hepatic Echinococcosis
- •Retroperitoneal Cystic Masses
- •13.4.2.1 Biliary Drainage
- •13.4.2.3 Liver Resection
- •13.4.2.4 Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- •13.4.2.5 Liver Transplantation
- •13.4.2.6 Laparoscopic Surgery
- •13.4.2.7 Reoperation
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1.1 Etiology
- •Anatomical Factors
- •Pathological Factors
- •Surgeon Factors
- •14.1.2.2 End-to-End Cholangiostomy
- •14.1.2.3 Choledochoduodenostomy
- •14.1.2.4 Roux-en-Y Cholangiojejunostomy
- •14.1.2.7 Liver Transplantation
- •14.2.2.1 Patient Information
- •14.2.2.2 Diagnosis
- •14.2.2.3 Complaint
- •14.2.2.4 History
- •14.2.2.5 Signs
- •14.2.2.6 Previous History
- •14.2.2.7 Laboratory Examination
- •Blood Routine
- •Coagulation Function
- •Liver Function
- •Renal Function
- •Tumor Markers
- •14.2.2.8 General Condition Assessment
- •Nutritional Status Evaluation
- •Liver Function Evaluation
- •Important Organ Function Evaluation
- •14.2.2.9 Imaging Evaluation
- •Evaluation by 3D Visualization
- •14.2.2.10 Surgical Planning
- •14.2.2.11 Surgical Procedures
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •14.2.3.1 Patient Information
- •14.2.3.2 Diagnosis
- •14.2.3.3 Complaint
- •14.2.3.4 History
- •14.2.3.5 Signs
- •14.2.3.6 Previous History
- •14.2.3.7 Laboratory Examination
- •Blood Routine
- •Coagulation Function
- •Liver Function
- •Renal Function
- •Tumor Markers
- •14.2.3.8 General Condition Assessment
- •Nutritional Status Evaluation
- •Liver Function Evaluation
- •Important Organ Function Evaluation
- •14.2.3.9 Imaging Evaluation
- •Evaluation by 3D Visualization
- •14.2.3.10 Surgical Planning
- •14.2.3.11 Surgical Procedure
- •Step 1
- •Step 2
- •Step 3
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Clinical Stages
- •15.2.2 Surgical Strategy
- •Tis/T1a Stage
- •T1b Stage
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.2.2.2 Lymph Node Dissection Range
- •Stage Tis/T1a
- •Stage T1b
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.2.2.3 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Management
- •Stage Tis/T1a
- •Stage T1b
- •Stage T2
- •Stage T3
- •Stage T4
- •15.3.1 T Staging Assessment
- •15.3.1.1 Stage T2
- •MDCT
- •15.3.1.2 Stage T3
- •MDCT
- •15.3.1.3 Stage T4
- •15.3.3 Resectability Assessment
- •15.3.3.1 General Assessment
- •15.3.3.2 Liver Function Assessment
- •15.3.3.3 Virtual Surgery Assessment
- •15.4.1 Surgical Indications
- •15.4.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •15.4.2.3 Preoperative 3D Visualization Evaluation
- •15.4.3 Surgical Procedures
- •15.4.3.1 Resection Range
- •Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- •15.4.4 Surgical Prognosis
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.2.2 Imaging Diagnosis
- •16.2.2.3 Pathological Diagnosis
- •16.2.2.4 Clinical Staging
- •16.2.3.1 Preoperative Assessment
- •Liver Function Assessment
- •Resectability Assessment
- •3D Visualization Assessment
- •16.2.3.2 Surgical Approach
- •16.2.3.3 Controversial Point
- •Lymphadenectomy
- •Extended Hepatectomy
- •Liver Transplantation
- •Operative Prognosis
- •16.2.4 Multidisciplinary Team
- •16.2.5 Conclusion
- •Notes
- •16.3.4 Surgical Planning Guided by 3D Visualization
- •Type I
- •Type II
- •Type IIIa
- •Type IIIb
- •Type IVa
- •Type IVb
- •Type V
- •16.3.6.2 Typical Case
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •Case 5
- •16.3.6.4 Lymphadenectomy
- •16.3.6.6 Laparoscopic Exploration
- •16.3.6.7 Intraoperative Frozen Section Consultation
- •16.3.6.8 Liver Transplantation
- •Common Type
- •Type II Variation
- •Type III Variation
- •16.3.10 Other Comprehensive Treatment
- •16.3.11 Other Perioperative Management
- •16.3.11.2 Postoperative Follow-Up
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2.2.1 Perihilar Tumor
- •17.2.2.2 High Biliary Stricture
- •Hepatic Arterial Variation
- •Portal Vein Variations
- •Bile Duct Variations
- •17.3.2 Complex Pathophysiology
- •17.4.1.3 Preoperative Biliary Drainage
- •17.4.2.3 Cholangiojejunostomy
- •17.6 3D Visualization Imaging
- •Viscera Reconstruction
- •Lesion Reconstruction
- •Vascular Reconstruction
- •References

12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
307
• The risk of stone extraction for grade III and above bile
ducts should be evaluated according to the intraoperative
conditions, such as the angle of the bile duct, the actual
diameter of the bile duct, and the size and location of the
stones, especially for the distal bile duct near the diaphragm, which is difcult to nd after injury, and easily
involved in the diaphragm and thoracic cavity.
• Attention should be paid to the following details during
operation: The lithotripsy rod can be activated only when
it touches the stone; lithotripsy rod should be placed in the
center of the stone, not between the stone ssure or the
wall of the bile duct; hit step by step when the stone is
large; the size of the gravel should be determined by the
ability to be removed by the net basket or ushed out of
the bile duct; when the net basket with stones cannot be
pulled out, release it and further gravel should be carried
out. Forced pull should be forbidden. No special treatment is required for the damage of the bile duct mucosa.
After biliary tract damage, it can repair itself. Once the
diagnosis of biliary tract stula is clear, it should be
drained in time to control infection. Surgical treatment
should be performed when conservative treatment is
ineffective.
12.10.9.2 Biliary Bleeding
The occurrence of biliary bleeding is often directly related to
the basic state of the biliary tract, often complicated with
recurrent biliary tract infection, leading to congested wall,
edema, and fragile texture. Patients with liver cirrhosis have
extensive varices of the bile duct wall, which is also an
important risk factor of biliary bleeding. Several treatment
methods are introduced below in terms of the prevention and
treatment of biliary bleeding: the punctate hemorrhage of the
bile duct wall can be washed with norepinephrine solution or
thrombin solution, inducing a satisfactory hemostatic effect.
However, the effect of intraoperative hemostatic drug washing for extensive bleeding of bile duct mucous membrane is
unsatisfactory, and will often require gauze packing, balloon
compression, or electrocoagulation under choledochoscope
so as to prevent the recurrence of bleeding after surgery. The
diagnosis of biliary bleeding is not difcult for patients with
an indwelling T-tube. However, the key is to determine the
cause and location of bleeding. Selective celiac arteriography can be used as the rst choice for the diagnosis and treatment of postoperative biliary bleeding. When nonoperative
treatment is ineffective, timely surgical hemostasis should be
performed. With regard to the prevention of biliary hemorrhage, rst of all, preoperative active control of biliary tract
infection and the improvement of liver function should be
ensured, and especially in patients with cirrhosis, the operation should be performed on the premise of Child-Pugh class
A or B grade of liver function; secondly, the operation should
be performed gently in order to reduce the chance of vascular
injury; in addition, T-tube should be placed at the appropriate
time, and the stones should be removed by stages through the
sinus tract if the bile duct was found to be suppurative or at
high risk of biliary bleeding during the operation.
12.10.9.3 Gastrointestinal Water Retention
Reasons
For patients with difcult stone removal or extensive stone
distribution, saline should be continuously infused during
the operation to keep the visual eld clear. A large amount of
physiological saline ows into the gastrointestinal tract
through the common bile duct, resulting in water retention in
the gastrointestinal tract, and secondary water–electrolyte
balance disorder, and even water poisoning.
Prevention andTreatment
Before the removal of hepatolithiasis, the lower part of the
common bile duct should be temporarily lled with a gauze
strip to reduce the amount of ushing uid entering the intestinal tract through it. Meanwhile, the suction device is used
to continuously draw the overowing lavage uid to reduce
the water adsorption; the amount of biliary ushing must be
controlled, and the stone extraction should be completed as
soon as possible.
12.10.9.4 Biliary Leakage
The occurrence of bile leakage is closely related to the laparoscopic suturing technique of the surgeon, especially when
the bile duct wall is thin; on the other hand, because the intrahepatic dilatation bile duct is adjacent to the liver surface,
bile leakage or bile duct drainage may occur when the bile
duct is broken during the process of hard mirror lithotripsy
and net basketing.
The prevention of bile leakage rst requires the surgeon
to master the laparoscopic suture technique. After suturing,
the bile leakage around the T-tube should be carefully
observed. Secondly, the 3D visualization technique can be
used intraoperatively to conrm the individualized blood
supply of bile duct, so as to avoid cutting the main blood supply artery of the extrahepatic bile duct when cutting the common bile duct; then master the techniques of hard mirror
lithotripsy and net basket stone removal.
In conclusion, 3D visualization-assisted 3D laparoscopy,
and choledochoscope hepatolithiasis targeting lithotripsy is
a novel operative method, which provides a new choice for
the diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis. For hepatobiliary surgeons, mastering the principles of prevention and
management of the complications mentioned above is of
great practical value for the rational application of the
procedure.

308
Q. Lu et al.
12.11 Application of3D Visualization
inReoperation ofBile Duct
12.11.1 Reoperation ofBile Duct
Reoperation of the bile duct, as one of the most difcult
problems in biliary surgery at present, refers to the operation
that needs to be performed again after biliary surgery because
the primary disease has not been cured or postoperative complications have occurred. The causes of the reoperation of
the biliary tract are complicated. On the one hand, the failure
to completely remove the factors of biliary tract primary diseases is the main reason; on the other hand, reasons such as
inappropriate surgical methods, complications after biliary
tract surgery, and iatrogenic biliary tract injury can also
cause reoperation of the bile duct. A good therapeutic effect
can only be achieved by a more accurate preoperative evaluation and a reasonable surgical plan.
12.11.1.1 Reasons
Main Reasons
The disease itself and the operation. The disease itself mainly
refers to the recurrence or residual of stone, benign noncalculous biliary stricture, cystic dilatation of bile duct, and
biliary tract tumor; the main reasons for reoperation include
missed diagnosis before and during operation, recurrence of
diseases caused by the improper choice of operation timing
and operation mode, reoperation for various postoperative
complications, and iatrogenic bile duct injury.
Residual andRecurrence ofBiliary Stones
The incidence of residual stones or recurrence after surgical
clearance was 29.6%, and that of reoperation was 18.7 (Jan
etal. 1996). The factors related to recurrence include incomplete stone removal in the rst session, biliary stricture, loss
of Oddi sphincter function, cholestasis, and bacterial
infection.
Improper Choice ofSurgical Timing andProcedures
Patients with biliary tract infection are advised to undergo a
denitive surgery after antibiotic chemotherapy. However, if
there is no obvious remission after 2days of active treatment
in the acute phase, surgical treatment should be performed to
solve the biliary obstruction and establish biliary drainage.
Postoperative complications and mortality are high because
the emergency operation can hardly solve complicated biliary diseases, such as acute suppurative cholangitis. Secondary
or multiple biliary tract operations are necessary when (a)
the principle of “relieving the obstruction, removing lesions
and building unobstructed drainage” is not followed, (b) only
part of the stone is removed, (c) atrophic liver or lesions
without hepatectomy, (d) stricture relief without cholangioplasty or resection of lesions, (e) unobstructed drainage
without proper choledochojejunostomy. Other reasons for
reoperation of bile duct include the following: incomplete
resection of choledochal cyst, with only choledochojejunostomy, partial hepatectomy not performed in Caroli’s disease,
recurrence of stones or biliary cancers caused by stenosis of
the lower common bile duct or by loss of Oddi sphincter
function without choledochojejunostomy.
Postoperative Complications ofBiliary Tract
Various complications after biliary tract surgery may occur
due to the previously missed diagnosis or unreasonable
choice of surgical methods, such as biliary bleeding, drainage tube shedding, bile leakage, stricture of choledochojejunostomy, constrictive papillitis, and Oddi sphincter brosis.
The complications mentioned above need to be reoperated
because of the insufciency of clinical diagnosis and surgical methods during the rst operation.
Iatrogenic Biliary Tract Injury
It refers to biliary tract injury caused by improper operation
of the surgeon. The causes of iatrogenic biliary tract injury
are related to various factors. According to the causes of
injury, the location, degree, and type of biliary tract injury, as
well as the systemic and local complications of patients, the
principle of injury control should be followed, and the appropriate surgical plan selected.
Other Reasons
Biliary bleeding, residual cystic duct stones, stricture of the
biliary tract after liver transplantation, biliary tract infection
or recurrence of stones caused by stricture of choledochojejunostomy, unexpected detection of biliary tract tumors or
secondary biliary tract tumors (such as long-term canceration of postoperative intrahepatic cholelithiasis) after the rst
biliary tract operation.
12.11.1.2 Preoperative Preparation
andEvaluation
Sufcient preoperative preparation and accurate preoperative evaluation are the guarantees for successful biliary surgery since the reoperation of the bile duct is complicated and
difcult. Special attention should be paid to the following
aspects:
• The acquisition of detailed medical history and previous
surgical data, including the specic surgical procedure for
each operation, the location and time of the drainage tube
placement, and the postoperative recovery of the patient.
• Selection of a well-reasoned examination plan and com-
prehensive analysis: observe the spatial anatomical rela-

12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
309
tionship between the biliary system and its surrounding
blood vessels to clarify the location of the lesion through
combining more than two imaging examination methods,
especially the application of 3D visualization. Determine
whether there was stricture or dilatation of intrahepatic
and extrahepatic bile ducts; whether they were complicated with stones or carcinogenesis; and evaluate the general condition of the patients and the severity of the local
lesions of the biliary tract.
• Reasonable preoperative treatment: Understand the general condition of the patient according to the preoperative
examination, mainly including coagulation mechanism,
and liver and kidney function, supplemented with necessary preoperative adjuvant therapy to improve the preoperative systemic condition of patients and improve
surgical tolerance. When complicated with biliary tract
infection, antibiotic regimens are used to control acute
biliary tract infection.
• Selection of appropriate time and method of operation:
The goal of reoperation of the biliary tract is the denitive
surgery, which strives to remove the factors of disease
recurrence, reduce complications, and obtain a good clinical effect.
Therefore, according to the patients’ general condition,
liver function and the anatomic changes of the biliary tract
after biliary tract operation, the proper timing, and method of
operation should be chosen on the basis of detailed preoperative diagnosis and full evaluation, in order to ensure the postoperative effect of reoperation of the bile duct.
12.11.1.3 Surgical Procedures
Since the local anatomy of the surgical site and pathology
has changed in the reoperation, the difculty and the rate of
complications are higher than that of the previous operation.
Thus, more detailed preoperative evaluation and preparation
are needed to determine a reasonable individualized operation plan according to the patients’ individual condition, preoperative imaging examination, and intraoperative
exploration.
Choledocholithotomy andT-tube Drainage
This method is suitable for the patients with recurrent stones
of the common bile duct or common hepatic duct, or grade 2
cholangiolithiasis of the intrahepatic bile duct, without bile
duct stenosis, and without stenosis at the lower end of the
common bile duct. In combination with intraoperative choledochoscopy, try to remove stones at one time while preserving the function of Oddi sphincter as far as possible.
Avoid misuse of the biliary anastomosis.
Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy
It includes side-to-side Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy
and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after common bile duct
transection, and the common bile duct duodenal anastomosis
should be abandoned. It is suitable for common bile duct
dilatation with stricture of the lower end of the common bile
duct or Oddi sphincter dilatation with intestinal uid reux.
The common bile duct should be transected and closed after
removing the distal stones. If there is a stricture of left and
right hepatic duct, or grade 2 hepatic duct, it is better to have
strictured hepatic duct plasty, high bile duct, or hilar bile
duct pelvic cholangiojejunostomy.
Hepatectomy
For intrahepatic bile duct stones complicated with hepatic
atrophy and hypertrophy, or with cholangiocarcinoma, hepatectomy should be performed, and the curative effect of regular hepatectomy is better than that of irregular hepatectomy.
For bilateral multiple bile duct stones, preoperative liver
function and volume should be assessed, and bilateral hepatectomy should be performed in one stage or multiple stages.
For the patients whose hepatolithiasis is difcult to remove
by one operation, the cecal end of the ascending jejunum can
be retained subcutaneously for choledochoscopic lithotripsy,
or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiocentesis (PTCS),
once or multiple choledochoscopic lithotripsies (hard or
soft) to reduce the trauma of laparotomy and maximize the
removal of residual stones.
Laparoscopy Combined withHard or Soft
Choledochoscopy forIntrahepatic Bile Duct
Lithotripsy
If the patients with recurrence of hepatolithiasis have laparoscopic exploration, separable adhesion, and exposure of the
rst hepatic hilum, the common bile duct can be incised
under laparoscopy. Through the common bile duct approach,
a soft or hard choledochoscope can be adopted for lithotripsy
of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile duct stones; if
one-time stone removal is impossible, T-tube can be
indwelled for postoperative T-tube drainage through the
sinus tract. Laparoscopic hepatectomy or laparoscopicassisted hepatectomy can be used if intrahepatic hepatolithiasis complicated with canceration are found.
Intrahepatic Lithotripsy Through Sinus Tract or PTCS
For patients with T-tube or intrahepatic bile duct support
tube that was previously indwelled, lithotripsy can be performed under hard and soft choledochoscopy through the
sinus tract that formed 1–2months after surgery; while for
patients with multiple hepatolithiasis complicated with bili-

310
Q. Lu et al.
ary cirrhosis or Child-Pugh class B liver function, primary or
secondary PTCS, intrahepatic bile duct lithotripsy can be
performed to reduce surgical trauma.
Severe Symptomatic Patients
Liver transplantation is feasible for patients with extensive
intrahepatic bile duct stones whose symptoms occur repeatedly and lead to biliary cirrhosis and severe damage to liver
function.
12.11.2 Application of3D Visualization
Technique inReoperation of
theBile Duct
With the development of digital medicine, medical image
processing technology based on 3D visualization has been
widely used in the diagnosis and adjuvant treatment of clinical diseases. 3D visualization technology can reproduce the
anatomical space structure between abdominal organs, accurately locate the lesion position, assist in formulating the
operation plan, and guiding the operation in real time so as to
reduce the risk of operation and postoperative complications
effectively. For patients with residual or recurrent biliary calculi, a 3D visualization technique is used to evaluate the
anatomy and variation of stones and intrahepatic duct and
hepatic parenchyma lesion accurately, a reasonable and
effective hepatectomy program can be formulated through
simulation surgery.
The anatomy of the bile duct, portal vein, and hepatic vein
can be accurately and intuitively displayed through a 3D
visualization technique. It is of great signicance for the
patients undergoing reoperation of the bile duct.
• The overall anatomy of upper abdomen: The spatial anatomical relationship between the liver and extrahepatic
bile duct system and its adjacent abdominal organs is
observed stereoscopically, and the extent of lesions and
the degree of surgical difculty evaluated from the aspect
of gross anatomy.
• Anatomical observation of liver and biliary system:
Stereoscopic observation of liver deformation, atrophy, or
hypertrophy of liver segments/lobes, and transposition of
portal hepatis; the number and extent of hepatic segments
affected by biliary tract diseases; the variation of the
intrahepatic bile duct system, hepatic artery, hepatic vein
and portal vein, and the anatomical changes to the abovementioned duct system caused by previous operations.
• Anatomical changes of the biliary system: Location of the
diseased hepatic segment, location, size, shape, and quantity of gallstone or tumor lesion, and length and degree of
stricture or dilatation of bile duct.
3D visualization technology provides individual 3D liver
vascular anatomy, which is helpful for accurate location
diagnosis of stones, tumors, the anatomical variation of
intrahepatic ducts, and hepatic parenchyma lesions.
According to the anatomical features of the 3D visualized
biliary tract, combined with the patient’s whole body and
liver function, a plan for individualized reoperation of the
bile duct was formulated. Specic treatment methods are
detailed in Sect. 12.10.
References
Biliary Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines
for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis. Chin J Dig Surg.
2007;6(2):156–61.
Couinaud C. Lobes et segments hépatiques: notes sur l'architecture
anatomiques et chirurgicale du foie. Presse Med. 1954;62:709–12.
Dong J-H, Feng X-B, Duan W-D.Stepping into the “segmental” era of
biliary surgery. Chin J Digest Surg. 2017;16(4):341–4.
Fang CH, Liu J, Fan YF, etal. Outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatoli-
thiasis based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technique. J Am Coll
Surg. 2013;217(2):280–8.
Huang CC. Partial resection of the liver in treatment of intrahepatic
stones. Chin Med J. 1959;79:40–5.
Huang Z. The collection of academicians Huang Zhiqiang. Beijing:
People’s Military Medical Press; 2014. p.50–76.
Jan YY, Chen MF. Percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangio-
scopic lithotomy for hepatolithiasis: long-term results.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0016- 5107(95)70234- 2.
Jan YY, Chen MF, Wang CS, Jeng LB, Hwang TL, Chen SC.
Surgical treatment of hepatolithiasis: Long-term results. Surgery
1996;120:509–14.
Lee SK, Seo DW, Myung SJ, Park ET, Lim BC, Kim HJ, Yoo KS,
Park HJ, Joo YH, Kim MH, Min YI. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic treatment for hepatolithiasis: an evaluation of long-term results and risk factors for recurrence.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(3):318–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0016- 5107(01)70405- 1.
Sakpal SV, Babel N, Chamberlain R.Surgical management of hepatoli-
thiasis. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(3):194–202.
Yeh YH, Huang MH, Yang JC, Mo LR, Lin J, Yueh SK.Percutaneous
trans-hepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy in the treatment of intrahepatic stones: a study with 5-year follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;42(1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016- 5107(95)70236- 9.

Digital Surgical Diagnosis
andManagement ofBiliary Dilatation
JianYang, HaoyuHu, andChihuaFang
13
13.1 Introduction
Biliary dilatation (BD), also known as bile duct cyst, is a rare
primary biliary disease. It can be congenital, and can also
occur in adulthood, mainly manifesting as intrahepatic and
extrahepatic bile duct single or multiple local dilatations.
The typical clinical manifestations include jaundice, abdominal pain, and abdominal mass, often accompanied by pancreatitis, cholangitis, and carcinogenesis. The canceration
rate is 20 to 30 times that of the general population. Secondary
biliary dilatation caused by stones, strictures, or tumors of
the bile duct does not belong to the category of BD.
13.2 Etiology andClinical Classication
ofBiliary Dilatation
13.2.1 Etiology ofBD
BD is predominant in infants and young children, with a
male-to-female ratio of 1: (3–4) (Bhavsar et al. 2012;
Soares et al. 2014), mainly in Southeast Asia and Japan.
The incidence of BD is remarkably higher in Eastern countries, notably Japan and Koreas, with a reported incidence
of 1in 1000, whereas it is 1:100,000–150,000in Western
countries (Lee etal. 2009a, b). There have been three theories about the etiology of this disease: (a) the theory of
abnormal proliferation of bile duct epithelium, (b) the theory of abnormal pancreaticobiliary duct conuence, and (c)
the theory of abnormal nerve development. After Babbit
et al. proposed in 1969 that abnormal pancreaticobiliary
junction was the leading cause of choledochal cysts (Babbitt
J. Yang · H. Hu · C. Fang (*)
Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University,
Guangzhou, China
etal. 1973), many researchers began to support this theory.
Abnormal pancreaticobiliary duct conuence is a congenital developmental abnormality, in which the pancreaticobiliary duct ows far from the intestinal wall outside the
sphincter of the duodenal papilla. According to the different parts of the conuence, it can be divided into (a) mucosal or submucosal conuence; (b) external conuence of
the intrinsic muscular layer. In the latter case, the pancreaticobiliary ducts conuence in the pancreatic parenchyma
outside the proper muscular layer of the duodenum, and
then form a common duct opening to the Vater papilla,
which is the theory of abnormal pancreaticobiliary duct
conuence. The anatomical basis of this theory is the conuence of the pancreaticobiliary duct outside the sphincter,
the conuent tube is long, and the junction is obtuse. When
the distal ampullary sphincter acts, the two tubes can communicate freely, and the pancreatic juice is often countercurrent to the bile duct because of high pressure in the
pancreatic duct. The pathological changes of biliary tract
caused by pancreatic juice ow into the bile duct were
related to the degree of the activation of pancreatic enzyme:
(a) there were no pathological changes in the biliary tract if
the pancreatic enzyme was not activated; (b) mild or slow
activation of the pancreatic enzyme caused hyperplasia of
the mucous membrane of the bile duct, metaplasia of the
mucosa, and chronic bacterial infection. Mucosal epithelial
metaplasia easily leads to complications such as cholecystitis, biliary calculi, and gallbladder cancer carcinoma; (c)
intense activation of the pancreatic enzyme leads to pathological changes such as the exfoliation of the mucous membrane, rupture of elastic ber in the muscle layer, stricture
of the end of the bile duct, and acute bacterial infection.
The laceration of elastic bers in the muscular layer of the
bile duct is more likely to cause complications such as perforation of the bile duct and dilatation of the common bile
duct. Bile ow into the pancreatic duct mainly causes acute
pancreatitis or acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021
C. Fang, W. Y. Lau (eds.), Biliary Tract Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6769-2_13
311

312
CI
III IV A IV BV
J. Yang et al.
13.2.2 Clinical Classication ofBiliary
Dilatation
There are many BD classication methods, which can be
divided into intrahepatic type, extrahepatic type, and mixed
type, according to the location of occurrence. Todani classication (Miyano etal. 2000) (Fig.13.1) and Dong’s classication is commonly used clinically.
Todani Classication
Type I Dilatation of the extrahepatic bile duct.
Type Ia Cystic dilatation of the common bile duct.
Type Ib Saccular dilatation of the common bile duct.
Type Ic Fusiform dilatation extending to the common bile
duct.
Type II Diverticulum of the common bile duct.
Type III Choledochocele involving intraduodenal por-
tion of CBD.
Type IV Intra- and extrahepatic duct dilatation.
Type IVa Both intra- and extrahepatic cysts.
Type IVb Multiple extrahepatic cysts only.
Type V Intrahepatic cysts only (Caroli disease) (Fig.13.2).
Jiahong Dong etal. proposed a new classication method
based on the cyst location and pathological features in the
biliary tree, referred to as Dong’s classication (Dong etal.
2013).
Type A2 Cystic dilatation of the bile duct was diffused to
the entire intrahepatic biliary tree.
Type B Cystic dilation of central large intrahepatic bile
duct above the hilar convergence.
Type B1 Single localized form limited to one hepatic
lobe.
Type B2 Cystic dilation in hilar convergence or in bi-lobar
central bile ducts.
Type C Cystic dilatation of the extrahepatic bile duct.
Type C1 Without intrapancreatic bile duct involvement.
Type C2 With intrapancreatic bile duct involvement.
Type D Cystic dilation involving both the intra- and the
extrahepatic bile ducts.
Type D1 Cystic dilation limited to one lobe.
Type D2 Cystic dilation expanded to bi-lobar bile ducts.
Type E Cystic dilation of the distal common bile duct.
13.3 Imaging Diagnosis ofBiliary
Dilatation
The imaging diagnosis is helpful in determining the extent of
involvement and the degree of dilation of the diseased bile
duct, as well as the structure of the biliary and pancreatic
duct, which can provide a basis for the evaluation of patient’s
condition, formulation of the treatment plan and selection of
the surgical procedure.
Dong’s Classication
Type A Cystic dilatation of the peripheral biliary tree limited
to the intrahepatic bile ducts.
Type A1 Cystic dilatation of the bile duct was limited to
one hepatic lobe or several segments.
I AI BI
13.3.1 Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography (US) is noninvasive and accurate, with
specicity as high as 97%, by which the adjacent liver and
I
Fig. 13.1 Diagram of Todani classication of BD (provided by Yan Jiayan, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

13 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofBiliary Dilatation
313
Fig. 13.2 Imaging of BD
pancreas can be displayed; from which the degree and range
of the dilatation of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile
ducts can be determined. US has become the currently preferred imaging method. Todani classication: type II biliary
cysts and Caroli’s disease are apparent by ultrasound imaging. The typical US show “cysts” in the common bile duct,
most of which are spherical, oval, or fusiform, and can
extend to the hilar of the liver or the head of the pancreas,
presenting with a clearly bounded cystic anechoic area. This
area is connected to the common bile duct, associated with
no or slight dilatation of the proximal bile duct. The cyst is
distributed along the main branch of the bile duct and merged
with the hepatic portal. The cyst presents a round or fusiform
non-echoic area; those which present as “lotus root ganglion” located in the ventral side of the portal vein and the
intrahepatic bile duct with bead dilatation are the manifestation of Caroli’s disease. When complicated with calculi,
strong echoic masses are seen in the anechoic area of the bile
duct, accompanied by an acoustic shadow, and the position
of the bile duct can be moved. When malignant change
occurs in the choledochal cyst, it can be seen that the cyst
protrudes from the cystic wall to the cystic lumen, presenting
an irregular hyperechoic mass or local thickening of the cystic wall. Real-time dynamic observation of the changes of
the bile duct wall is of great value for early detection of carcinogenesis. Choledochal cyst and extrahepatic cystadenoma
can be differentiated by ultrasound without intracavitary
separation.
Despite the advantages of ultrasonography mentioned
above, US can neither display the entire appearance of the
intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and the main pancreatic duct, nor distinguish the tissue structure around the bile
duct and the area of conuence of the pancreatic duct and the
bile duct. The reason is that US is susceptible to intraabdominal intestinal gas interference and the limits of the
orientation of an ultrasound section. The accuracy of ultrasonography cannot adequately meet the needs of clinical diagnosis, so it is of limited help in the development of surgical
plans.
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a combination of
ultrasonography and endoscopy. It can acquire histological
features of the pipeline and ultrasound images of adjacent
organs. EUS can directly scan the hepatic hilus and the lower
part of the common bile duct through the duodenal bulb and
descending part; and can display the pancreaticobiliary junction and the diseased bile duct.
13.3.2 Multi-Slice CT
With the clinical popularization of submillimeter CT, MultiSlice Computer Tomography (MSCT) has signicantly

314
J. Yang et al.
improved in terms of spatial and temporal resolution.
Through MRCT, the size, shape, and extent of cysts can be
displayed clearly; also, the relationship between the cysts
and their surrounding structures, as well as the complications
and signs conducive to the diagnosis of this disease can be
well displayed. For example, “central dot” sign: small dotted
soft tissue shadow in cystic shadow, whose density is lower
or equal to that of liver parenchyma on the plain scan. This
“central dot” is the imaging of the intrahepatic portal vein
branch, which was previously considered to be a specic
sign for the diagnosis of Caroli’s disease; however, some
scholars believe that this sign can also be seen in the dilated
bile duct after obstruction. Therefore, the diagnosis should
be combined with other comprehensive analyses. The “beading sign,” or “tadpole sign”: intrahepatic biliary cysts appear
as multiple circular water-like density lesions, with mildly
dilated bile ducts and saccular lesions intermingling with
each other or on their margins. This disproportionate dilation
and its characteristics with normal bile ducts are the keys to
differentiate biliary cysts from obstructive biliary dilatation,
which is manifested as a gradual thinning ratio from the center to the periphery. The “beading sign,” or “tadpole sign” is
valuable in the diagnosis of Caroli’s disease (Park et al.
2005). Contrast-enhanced CT examination showed that the
tumor nodule in the bile duct wall protruded into the lumen
is signicantly enhanced, which is the basis for the diagnosis
of BD canceration (Fig.13.3).
Intravenous injection of cholestyramine for enhanced
contrast spiral CT cholangiography (IVC-SCT) is useful in
determining the relationship between cysts and bile ducts.
Meanwhile, the three-dimensional images of the biliary
tract and its surrounding anatomical structure can be
obtained by image post-processing, which provides valu-
Fig. 13.3 Contrast-enhanced CT scan showing an enhanced nodular
shadow about 2cm in diameter on the wall of the choledochal cyst, suggesting the carcinogenesis of the cyst (arrow)
able information for the selection of treatment schemes. If
there is a communication between the cyst and the bile duct,
the resolution of CT is sufcient to show the accumulation
of contrast media in the cyst, thus making a denite diagnosis of the choledochal cyst. However, the display of cholangiography needs a contrast agent to be discharged into the
bile duct. The results of the MSCT can be affected when BD
is complicated with obstructive jaundice and cholangitis.
Stockberger etal. (Yu etal. 2004) found that the development rate of the bile duct was only 25% when the level of
serum bilirubin was higher than 34μmol/L; while the development rate of the bile duct was 93% when the level was
less than 34μmol/L.At the same time, the incapability of
CT to clearly display the detailed characteristics of the distal common bile duct and pancreaticobiliary duct conuence brought certain difculties to the formulation of the
operation plan.
Although CT has the advantages of a high diagnosis rate,
moderate cost, and minimal invasiveness, an allergic reaction may occur because of the need for intravenous injection
of contrast agent. Also, the patient is instructed to hold his
breath during the examination, which is often impossible for
children under the age of 5years, especially for infants, and
artifacts are prone to be produced, thus reducing the efcacy
of the examination.
13.3.3 ERCP andPTC
As diagnostic and therapeutic methods for the nal diagnosis
of BD, ERCP, and PTC can be used to classify BD accurately, so that the structure of the biliary and pancreatic duct,
and the shape and extent of the cyst can be clearly displayed.
They can also be used to judge the presence of cholangiopancreatic stones, strictures, and carcinogenesis, as well as to
determine the distal bile duct and Todani classication: the
anatomical relationship between extrahepatic part and the
pancreatic duct of type I biliary cyst and type IVa cyst conrmed the existence of abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction. It is critical to determine the anatomical location of the
conuence of the cholangiopancreatic duct because this
plays a crucial role in the avoidance of injury to the pancreatic duct during the excision of the cyst to facilitate the discovery of stones in the common bile duct or conuence, and
to remove distal tumors.
ERCP is most suitable for adult patients without
cholangio- intestinal anastomosis. It can highlight the conuence of the pancreatic duct and the bile duct through the
ampulla and can also be used to determine whether there is
cancer by biopsy or cytological examination of the cells
(Fig. 13.4). The symptom of severe cholangitis can be
relieved either by the removal of stones in the cyst through
the incision of the duodenal papilla, or by the placement of

13 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofBiliary Dilatation
Fig. 13.4 ERCP clearly showing the shape and extent of intrahepatic
and extrahepatic bile ducts and cysts, and suggesting that the patient has
an abnormal conuence of the pancreatic bile ducts
temporary endoscopic stents before the operation. In patients
with portal hypertension, the esophagus and stomach fundus
can be examined by endoscopy. All branches and cavities of
the bile duct should be examined during ERCP, and cystic
wall biopsies should be performed, if necessary, to exclude
the possibility of malignancy. The use of balloon blockage
ensures that the bile duct tree is adequately lled with contrast media, especially for patients who have previously
undergone cyst-duodenostomy. ERCP is the rst choice for
the diagnosis of Todani III type cyst or choledochal cyst
because the incision of the duodenal papilla under endoscope
has particular therapeutic value.
Although the diversity of ERCP has reduced the use of
PTC, it is still an important diagnostic and therapeutic technique in biliary surgery. Patients with previous Roux-en-Y
cyst jejunostomy or hepaticojejunostomy are considered
for PTC.Besides, PTC is also suitable for the patient with
type IV choledochal cyst when the intrahepatic choledochal
cyst cannot be well displayed by ERCP due to biliary stricture or tumor. Percutaneous biliary drainage after PTC or
biliary tract support after choledochojejunostomy can be
performed to control sepsis caused by biliary tract infection. The role of PTC is limited when extensive cyst-jejunostomy prevents local preservation of the cyst and affects
the complete display of the cyst, or when a giant extrahe-
315
Fig. 13.5 PTC diagnosed a case of type IV BD, but showed poor
results in the lower end of the common bile duct and at the conuence
of the biliary and pancreatic ducts
patic bile duct cyst overlaps with the pancreaticobiliary
junction, which makes the identication of related structures difcult (Fig.13.5).
PTC and ERCP have both advantages and disadvantages
for the diagnosis of BD. Both methods are invasive and
require a large amount of contrast media to display the bile
duct completely. Complications such as bleeding, bile leakage, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis may occur.
Although ERCP can conrm the existence of abnormal pancreaticobiliary juxtaposition, its clinical application has been
dramatically limited because it is invasive, and children often
need to be intubated under general anesthesia, but 3% to
10% of intubation fails.
13.3.4 Magnetic Resonance
Cholangiopancreatography
The purpose of Magnetic Resonance hydrography (MR hydrography) can be achieved by restraining the tissue signal around
the biliary tract through a T2 weighted imaging technique to
highlight the signal of water- bearing biliary tract; a stereoscopic
image of the cholangiopancreatic duct system can be obtained
by the three-dimensional reconstruction of the image data
through a computer. The advantages are as follows:
• The full view of the biliary tree and the abnormal connec-
tion of the lower part of the pancreaticobiliary duct related
to the etiology of the disease can be clearly and stereo-
scopically displayed free from the inuence of pressure
factors when the contrast agent is injected (Lee et al.
2009a, b).

316
J. Yang et al.
• MRCP is a noninvasive examination, that is safe and comfortable, with no radiation damage, which is easy to operate on.
• It is not affected by anatomic structural changes after
surgery.
• There are no complications such as biliary infection and
acute pancreatitis.
• The reconstructed images can be observed in multi-angle
and multi-axial positions, and the lesions can be displayed
stereoscopically and more intuitively.
• It is suitable for patients who cannot tolerate ERCP and
children who cannot cooperate with the examination.
Compared with direct cholangiography, MRCP provides
an equivalent or even superior BD imaging method, which
can provide accurate anatomical development for infants and
adults, and a reliable basis for surgical treatment. The dilated
bile duct could be cystic, columnar, or diverticular, with high
signal intensity on MRCP images. In cases complicated with
stones, low signal lling defects could be observed against
the background of high signal intensity. For Caroli’s disease,
MRCP is currently considered to be the only ideal diagnostic
method that can show normal bile ducts and cylindrical, cystic, or spindle-shaped dilated bile ducts, as well as the communication between the cystic lumen and the intrahepatic
bile duct. This sign is a characteristic manifestation of the
diagnosis of this disease (Fig.13.6). In the case of cholangiocarcinoma, nodular parenchyma, asymmetric stricture of the
bile duct, or truncation of bile duct are observed in MRI
transverse axis and MRCP.
Fig. 13.6 MRCP showing the presence of a bile duct cyst and an
abnormal connection of the lower segment of the pancreatic bile duct
associated with the etiology of the disease
ERCP has the possibility of over-evaluating the degree of
bile duct stenosis, and the gas and pulsatile vascular artifacts
in the gastrointestinal tract can cause pseudo-stricture of the
bile duct. Meanwhile, MRCP is insensitive to mild stenosis
and micro-calculi and is susceptible to volumetric effects
and motion artifacts. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the
original image and conventional sequence images carefully
to provide a reliable diagnostic basis for the formulation of a
clinical operation plan.
The anatomical structure of the pancreatic duct and cholangiopancreatic junction in MRCP is inferior to that of
ERCP.However, with the improvement of MRI resolution,
the limitations of MRI imaging in the diagnosis of biliary
and pancreatic duct conuence have been steadily reduced.
13.3.5 Intraoperative Cholangiography
Signicant advances in the understanding of BD disease
have revealed the truth that routine examinations may not
meet the display needs for some specic diseases. However,
intraoperative cholangiography can make up for the
deciency.
Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) can clearly display
the shape of the common bile duct, especially the shape and
location of the distal common bile duct. Understanding the
shape of the intrahepatic bile duct and whether it is complicated with intrahepatic bile duct dilatation can sometimes
help discover the rare vagal bile duct and complicated biliary
malformation. Thus, the operation supplemented by cholangiography can effectively reduce postoperative complications (Liu etal. 2007).
For patients with Todani type IVa, if only extrahepatic
cysts are resected, without sufcient and adequate drainage
of intrahepatic cysts, 23%–40% of the cases have postoperative complications such as recurrent cholangitis and liver
abscess (Chijiiwa and Koga 1993). The reasons are related to
cholestasis and biliary tract infection caused by relative stenosis of the intrahepatic bile duct at the opening of the common hepatic duct or membranous stenosis and septal stenosis.
Intraoperative cholangiography can help to show the type
and extent of intrahepatic bile duct stenosis. Intrahepatic
cholangioplasty and high hepatic duct jejunostomy were performed according to the stenosis.
However, IOC may have false-positive and false-negative
results. If the injection of contrast media is insufcient, the
intrahepatic bile duct will not ll; or the bubbles, mucus
blocks, and blood clots in the bile duct may cause diagnostic
doubts in the course of reading the radiographs. At this time,
judgments should be made based on choledochoscopic
observation, a bile duct probe for intrahepatic bile duct and
distal common bile duct exploration, and intraoperative
observation, to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
