Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
75 Мб
Скачать
12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
307
• The risk of stone extraction for grade III and above bile ducts should be evaluated according to the intraoperative conditions, such as the angle of the bile duct, the actual diameter of the bile duct, and the size and location of the stones, especially for the distal bile duct near the dia­phragm, which is difcult to nd after injury, and easily involved in the diaphragm and thoracic cavity.
• Attention should be paid to the following details during operation: The lithotripsy rod can be activated only when it touches the stone; lithotripsy rod should be placed in the center of the stone, not between the stone ssure or the wall of the bile duct; hit step by step when the stone is large; the size of the gravel should be determined by the ability to be removed by the net basket or ushed out of the bile duct; when the net basket with stones cannot be pulled out, release it and further gravel should be carried out. Forced pull should be forbidden. No special treat­ment is required for the damage of the bile duct mucosa. After biliary tract damage, it can repair itself. Once the diagnosis of biliary tract stula is clear, it should be drained in time to control infection. Surgical treatment should be performed when conservative treatment is ineffective.
12.10.9.2 Biliary Bleeding
The occurrence of biliary bleeding is often directly related to the basic state of the biliary tract, often complicated with recurrent biliary tract infection, leading to congested wall, edema, and fragile texture. Patients with liver cirrhosis have extensive varices of the bile duct wall, which is also an important risk factor of biliary bleeding. Several treatment methods are introduced below in terms of the prevention and treatment of biliary bleeding: the punctate hemorrhage of the bile duct wall can be washed with norepinephrine solution or thrombin solution, inducing a satisfactory hemostatic effect. However, the effect of intraoperative hemostatic drug wash­ing for extensive bleeding of bile duct mucous membrane is unsatisfactory, and will often require gauze packing, balloon compression, or electrocoagulation under choledochoscope so as to prevent the recurrence of bleeding after surgery. The diagnosis of biliary bleeding is not difcult for patients with an indwelling T-tube. However, the key is to determine the cause and location of bleeding. Selective celiac arteriogra­phy can be used as the rst choice for the diagnosis and treat­ment of postoperative biliary bleeding. When nonoperative treatment is ineffective, timely surgical hemostasis should be performed. With regard to the prevention of biliary hemor­rhage, rst of all, preoperative active control of biliary tract infection and the improvement of liver function should be ensured, and especially in patients with cirrhosis, the opera­tion should be performed on the premise of Child-Pugh class A or B grade of liver function; secondly, the operation should
be performed gently in order to reduce the chance of vascular injury; in addition, T-tube should be placed at the appropriate time, and the stones should be removed by stages through the sinus tract if the bile duct was found to be suppurative or at high risk of biliary bleeding during the operation.
12.10.9.3 Gastrointestinal Water Retention
Reasons
For patients with difcult stone removal or extensive stone distribution, saline should be continuously infused during the operation to keep the visual eld clear. A large amount of physiological saline ows into the gastrointestinal tract through the common bile duct, resulting in water retention in the gastrointestinal tract, and secondary water–electrolyte balance disorder, and even water poisoning.
Prevention andTreatment
Before the removal of hepatolithiasis, the lower part of the common bile duct should be temporarily lled with a gauze strip to reduce the amount of ushing uid entering the intes­tinal tract through it. Meanwhile, the suction device is used to continuously draw the overowing lavage uid to reduce the water adsorption; the amount of biliary ushing must be controlled, and the stone extraction should be completed as soon as possible.
12.10.9.4 Biliary Leakage
The occurrence of bile leakage is closely related to the lapa­roscopic suturing technique of the surgeon, especially when the bile duct wall is thin; on the other hand, because the intra­hepatic dilatation bile duct is adjacent to the liver surface, bile leakage or bile duct drainage may occur when the bile duct is broken during the process of hard mirror lithotripsy and net basketing.
The prevention of bile leakage rst requires the surgeon to master the laparoscopic suture technique. After suturing, the bile leakage around the T-tube should be carefully observed. Secondly, the 3D visualization technique can be used intraoperatively to conrm the individualized blood supply of bile duct, so as to avoid cutting the main blood sup­ply artery of the extrahepatic bile duct when cutting the com­mon bile duct; then master the techniques of hard mirror lithotripsy and net basket stone removal.
In conclusion, 3D visualization-assisted 3D laparoscopy, and choledochoscope hepatolithiasis targeting lithotripsy is a novel operative method, which provides a new choice for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis. For hepatobi­liary surgeons, mastering the principles of prevention and management of the complications mentioned above is of great practical value for the rational application of the procedure.
308
Q. Lu et al.
12.11 Application of3D Visualization inReoperation ofBile Duct
12.11.1 Reoperation ofBile Duct
Reoperation of the bile duct, as one of the most difcult problems in biliary surgery at present, refers to the operation that needs to be performed again after biliary surgery because the primary disease has not been cured or postoperative com­plications have occurred. The causes of the reoperation of the biliary tract are complicated. On the one hand, the failure to completely remove the factors of biliary tract primary dis­eases is the main reason; on the other hand, reasons such as inappropriate surgical methods, complications after biliary tract surgery, and iatrogenic biliary tract injury can also cause reoperation of the bile duct. A good therapeutic effect can only be achieved by a more accurate preoperative evalu­ation and a reasonable surgical plan.
12.11.1.1 Reasons
Main Reasons
The disease itself and the operation. The disease itself mainly refers to the recurrence or residual of stone, benign non­calculous biliary stricture, cystic dilatation of bile duct, and biliary tract tumor; the main reasons for reoperation include missed diagnosis before and during operation, recurrence of diseases caused by the improper choice of operation timing and operation mode, reoperation for various postoperative complications, and iatrogenic bile duct injury.
Residual andRecurrence ofBiliary Stones
The incidence of residual stones or recurrence after surgical clearance was 29.6%, and that of reoperation was 18.7 (Jan etal. 1996). The factors related to recurrence include incom­plete stone removal in the rst session, biliary stricture, loss of Oddi sphincter function, cholestasis, and bacterial infection.
Improper Choice ofSurgical Timing andProcedures
Patients with biliary tract infection are advised to undergo a denitive surgery after antibiotic chemotherapy. However, if there is no obvious remission after 2days of active treatment in the acute phase, surgical treatment should be performed to solve the biliary obstruction and establish biliary drainage. Postoperative complications and mortality are high because the emergency operation can hardly solve complicated bili­ary diseases, such as acute suppurative cholangitis. Secondary or multiple biliary tract operations are necessary when (a) the principle of “relieving the obstruction, removing lesions and building unobstructed drainage” is not followed, (b) only part of the stone is removed, (c) atrophic liver or lesions
without hepatectomy, (d) stricture relief without cholangio­plasty or resection of lesions, (e) unobstructed drainage without proper choledochojejunostomy. Other reasons for reoperation of bile duct include the following: incomplete resection of choledochal cyst, with only choledochojejunos­tomy, partial hepatectomy not performed in Caroli’s disease, recurrence of stones or biliary cancers caused by stenosis of the lower common bile duct or by loss of Oddi sphincter function without choledochojejunostomy.
Postoperative Complications ofBiliary Tract
Various complications after biliary tract surgery may occur due to the previously missed diagnosis or unreasonable choice of surgical methods, such as biliary bleeding, drain­age tube shedding, bile leakage, stricture of choledochojeju­nostomy, constrictive papillitis, and Oddi sphincter brosis. The complications mentioned above need to be reoperated because of the insufciency of clinical diagnosis and surgi­cal methods during the rst operation.
Iatrogenic Biliary Tract Injury
It refers to biliary tract injury caused by improper operation of the surgeon. The causes of iatrogenic biliary tract injury are related to various factors. According to the causes of injury, the location, degree, and type of biliary tract injury, as well as the systemic and local complications of patients, the principle of injury control should be followed, and the appro­priate surgical plan selected.
Other Reasons
Biliary bleeding, residual cystic duct stones, stricture of the biliary tract after liver transplantation, biliary tract infection or recurrence of stones caused by stricture of choledochoje­junostomy, unexpected detection of biliary tract tumors or secondary biliary tract tumors (such as long-term cancera­tion of postoperative intrahepatic cholelithiasis) after the rst biliary tract operation.
12.11.1.2 Preoperative Preparation andEvaluation
Sufcient preoperative preparation and accurate preopera­tive evaluation are the guarantees for successful biliary sur­gery since the reoperation of the bile duct is complicated and difcult. Special attention should be paid to the following aspects:
• The acquisition of detailed medical history and previous
surgical data, including the specic surgical procedure for each operation, the location and time of the drainage tube placement, and the postoperative recovery of the patient.
• Selection of a well-reasoned examination plan and com-
prehensive analysis: observe the spatial anatomical rela-
12 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofHepatolithiasis
309
tionship between the biliary system and its surrounding blood vessels to clarify the location of the lesion through combining more than two imaging examination methods, especially the application of 3D visualization. Determine whether there was stricture or dilatation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts; whether they were compli­cated with stones or carcinogenesis; and evaluate the gen­eral condition of the patients and the severity of the local lesions of the biliary tract.
• Reasonable preoperative treatment: Understand the gen­eral condition of the patient according to the preoperative examination, mainly including coagulation mechanism, and liver and kidney function, supplemented with neces­sary preoperative adjuvant therapy to improve the preop­erative systemic condition of patients and improve surgical tolerance. When complicated with biliary tract infection, antibiotic regimens are used to control acute biliary tract infection.
• Selection of appropriate time and method of operation: The goal of reoperation of the biliary tract is the denitive surgery, which strives to remove the factors of disease recurrence, reduce complications, and obtain a good clini­cal effect.
Therefore, according to the patients’ general condition,
liver function and the anatomic changes of the biliary tract after biliary tract operation, the proper timing, and method of operation should be chosen on the basis of detailed preopera­tive diagnosis and full evaluation, in order to ensure the post­operative effect of reoperation of the bile duct.
12.11.1.3 Surgical Procedures
Since the local anatomy of the surgical site and pathology has changed in the reoperation, the difculty and the rate of complications are higher than that of the previous operation. Thus, more detailed preoperative evaluation and preparation are needed to determine a reasonable individualized opera­tion plan according to the patients’ individual condition, pre­operative imaging examination, and intraoperative exploration.
Choledocholithotomy andT-tube Drainage
This method is suitable for the patients with recurrent stones of the common bile duct or common hepatic duct, or grade 2 cholangiolithiasis of the intrahepatic bile duct, without bile duct stenosis, and without stenosis at the lower end of the common bile duct. In combination with intraoperative cho­ledochoscopy, try to remove stones at one time while pre­serving the function of Oddi sphincter as far as possible. Avoid misuse of the biliary anastomosis.
Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy
It includes side-to-side Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after common bile duct transection, and the common bile duct duodenal anastomosis should be abandoned. It is suitable for common bile duct dilatation with stricture of the lower end of the common bile duct or Oddi sphincter dilatation with intestinal uid reux. The common bile duct should be transected and closed after removing the distal stones. If there is a stricture of left and right hepatic duct, or grade 2 hepatic duct, it is better to have strictured hepatic duct plasty, high bile duct, or hilar bile duct pelvic cholangiojejunostomy.
Hepatectomy
For intrahepatic bile duct stones complicated with hepatic atrophy and hypertrophy, or with cholangiocarcinoma, hepa­tectomy should be performed, and the curative effect of regu­lar hepatectomy is better than that of irregular hepatectomy. For bilateral multiple bile duct stones, preoperative liver function and volume should be assessed, and bilateral hepa­tectomy should be performed in one stage or multiple stages. For the patients whose hepatolithiasis is difcult to remove by one operation, the cecal end of the ascending jejunum can be retained subcutaneously for choledochoscopic lithotripsy, or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiocentesis (PTCS), once or multiple choledochoscopic lithotripsies (hard or soft) to reduce the trauma of laparotomy and maximize the removal of residual stones.
Laparoscopy Combined withHard or Soft Choledochoscopy forIntrahepatic Bile Duct Lithotripsy
If the patients with recurrence of hepatolithiasis have laparo­scopic exploration, separable adhesion, and exposure of the rst hepatic hilum, the common bile duct can be incised under laparoscopy. Through the common bile duct approach, a soft or hard choledochoscope can be adopted for lithotripsy of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile duct stones; if one-time stone removal is impossible, T-tube can be indwelled for postoperative T-tube drainage through the sinus tract. Laparoscopic hepatectomy or laparoscopic­assisted hepatectomy can be used if intrahepatic hepatolithi­asis complicated with canceration are found.
Intrahepatic Lithotripsy Through Sinus Tract or PTCS
For patients with T-tube or intrahepatic bile duct support tube that was previously indwelled, lithotripsy can be per­formed under hard and soft choledochoscopy through the sinus tract that formed 1–2months after surgery; while for patients with multiple hepatolithiasis complicated with bili-
310
Q. Lu et al.
ary cirrhosis or Child-Pugh class B liver function, primary or secondary PTCS, intrahepatic bile duct lithotripsy can be performed to reduce surgical trauma.
Severe Symptomatic Patients
Liver transplantation is feasible for patients with extensive intrahepatic bile duct stones whose symptoms occur repeat­edly and lead to biliary cirrhosis and severe damage to liver function.
12.11.2 Application of3D Visualization
Technique inReoperation of theBile Duct
With the development of digital medicine, medical image processing technology based on 3D visualization has been widely used in the diagnosis and adjuvant treatment of clini­cal diseases. 3D visualization technology can reproduce the anatomical space structure between abdominal organs, accu­rately locate the lesion position, assist in formulating the operation plan, and guiding the operation in real time so as to reduce the risk of operation and postoperative complications effectively. For patients with residual or recurrent biliary cal­culi, a 3D visualization technique is used to evaluate the anatomy and variation of stones and intrahepatic duct and hepatic parenchyma lesion accurately, a reasonable and effective hepatectomy program can be formulated through simulation surgery.
The anatomy of the bile duct, portal vein, and hepatic vein
can be accurately and intuitively displayed through a 3D visualization technique. It is of great signicance for the patients undergoing reoperation of the bile duct.
• The overall anatomy of upper abdomen: The spatial ana­tomical relationship between the liver and extrahepatic bile duct system and its adjacent abdominal organs is observed stereoscopically, and the extent of lesions and the degree of surgical difculty evaluated from the aspect of gross anatomy.
• Anatomical observation of liver and biliary system: Stereoscopic observation of liver deformation, atrophy, or hypertrophy of liver segments/lobes, and transposition of portal hepatis; the number and extent of hepatic segments affected by biliary tract diseases; the variation of the intrahepatic bile duct system, hepatic artery, hepatic vein
and portal vein, and the anatomical changes to the above­mentioned duct system caused by previous operations.
• Anatomical changes of the biliary system: Location of the diseased hepatic segment, location, size, shape, and quan­tity of gallstone or tumor lesion, and length and degree of stricture or dilatation of bile duct.
3D visualization technology provides individual 3D liver
vascular anatomy, which is helpful for accurate location diagnosis of stones, tumors, the anatomical variation of intrahepatic ducts, and hepatic parenchyma lesions. According to the anatomical features of the 3D visualized biliary tract, combined with the patient’s whole body and liver function, a plan for individualized reoperation of the bile duct was formulated. Specic treatment methods are detailed in Sect. 12.10.

References

Biliary Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines
for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis. Chin J Dig Surg. 2007;6(2):156–61.
Couinaud C. Lobes et segments hépatiques: notes sur l'architecture
anatomiques et chirurgicale du foie. Presse Med. 1954;62:709–12.
Dong J-H, Feng X-B, Duan W-D.Stepping into the “segmental” era of
biliary surgery. Chin J Digest Surg. 2017;16(4):341–4.
Fang CH, Liu J, Fan YF, etal. Outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatoli-
thiasis based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technique. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(2):280–8.
Huang CC. Partial resection of the liver in treatment of intrahepatic
stones. Chin Med J. 1959;79:40–5.
Huang Z. The collection of academicians Huang Zhiqiang. Beijing:
People’s Military Medical Press; 2014. p.50–76.
Jan YY, Chen MF. Percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangio-
scopic lithotomy for hepatolithiasis: long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0016- 5107(95)70234- 2.
Jan YY, Chen MF, Wang CS, Jeng LB, Hwang TL, Chen SC.
Surgical treatment of hepatolithiasis: Long-term results. Surgery 1996;120:509–14.
Lee SK, Seo DW, Myung SJ, Park ET, Lim BC, Kim HJ, Yoo KS,
Park HJ, Joo YH, Kim MH, Min YI. Percutaneous transhe­patic cholangioscopic treatment for hepatolithiasis: an evalu­ation of long-term results and risk factors for recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(3):318–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0016- 5107(01)70405- 1.
Sakpal SV, Babel N, Chamberlain R.Surgical management of hepatoli-
thiasis. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(3):194–202.
Yeh YH, Huang MH, Yang JC, Mo LR, Lin J, Yueh SK.Percutaneous
trans-hepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy in the treatment of intra­hepatic stones: a study with 5-year follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42(1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016- 5107(95)70236- 9.
Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofBiliary Dilatation
JianYang, HaoyuHu, andChihuaFang
13

13.1 Introduction

Biliary dilatation (BD), also known as bile duct cyst, is a rare primary biliary disease. It can be congenital, and can also occur in adulthood, mainly manifesting as intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct single or multiple local dilatations. The typical clinical manifestations include jaundice, abdom­inal pain, and abdominal mass, often accompanied by pan­creatitis, cholangitis, and carcinogenesis. The canceration rate is 20 to 30 times that of the general population. Secondary biliary dilatation caused by stones, strictures, or tumors of the bile duct does not belong to the category of BD.
13.2 Etiology andClinical Classication ofBiliary Dilatation
13.2.1 Etiology ofBD
BD is predominant in infants and young children, with a male-to-female ratio of 1: (3–4) (Bhavsar et al. 2012; Soares et al. 2014), mainly in Southeast Asia and Japan. The incidence of BD is remarkably higher in Eastern coun­tries, notably Japan and Koreas, with a reported incidence of 1in 1000, whereas it is 1:100,000–150,000in Western countries (Lee etal. 2009a, b). There have been three theo­ries about the etiology of this disease: (a) the theory of abnormal proliferation of bile duct epithelium, (b) the the­ory of abnormal pancreaticobiliary duct conuence, and (c) the theory of abnormal nerve development. After Babbit et al. proposed in 1969 that abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction was the leading cause of choledochal cysts (Babbitt
J. Yang · H. Hu · C. Fang (*) Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
etal. 1973), many researchers began to support this theory. Abnormal pancreaticobiliary duct conuence is a congeni­tal developmental abnormality, in which the pancreatico­biliary duct ows far from the intestinal wall outside the sphincter of the duodenal papilla. According to the differ­ent parts of the conuence, it can be divided into (a) muco­sal or submucosal conuence; (b) external conuence of the intrinsic muscular layer. In the latter case, the pancreati­cobiliary ducts conuence in the pancreatic parenchyma outside the proper muscular layer of the duodenum, and then form a common duct opening to the Vater papilla, which is the theory of abnormal pancreaticobiliary duct conuence. The anatomical basis of this theory is the con­uence of the pancreaticobiliary duct outside the sphincter, the conuent tube is long, and the junction is obtuse. When the distal ampullary sphincter acts, the two tubes can com­municate freely, and the pancreatic juice is often counter­current to the bile duct because of high pressure in the pancreatic duct. The pathological changes of biliary tract caused by pancreatic juice ow into the bile duct were related to the degree of the activation of pancreatic enzyme: (a) there were no pathological changes in the biliary tract if the pancreatic enzyme was not activated; (b) mild or slow activation of the pancreatic enzyme caused hyperplasia of the mucous membrane of the bile duct, metaplasia of the mucosa, and chronic bacterial infection. Mucosal epithelial metaplasia easily leads to complications such as cholecys­titis, biliary calculi, and gallbladder cancer carcinoma; (c) intense activation of the pancreatic enzyme leads to patho­logical changes such as the exfoliation of the mucous mem­brane, rupture of elastic ber in the muscle layer, stricture of the end of the bile duct, and acute bacterial infection. The laceration of elastic bers in the muscular layer of the bile duct is more likely to cause complications such as per­foration of the bile duct and dilatation of the common bile duct. Bile ow into the pancreatic duct mainly causes acute pancreatitis or acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 C. Fang, W. Y. Lau (eds.), Biliary Tract Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6769-2_13
311
312
CI
III IV A IV BV
J. Yang et al.
13.2.2 Clinical Classication ofBiliary Dilatation
There are many BD classication methods, which can be divided into intrahepatic type, extrahepatic type, and mixed type, according to the location of occurrence. Todani classi­cation (Miyano etal. 2000) (Fig.13.1) and Dong’s classi­cation is commonly used clinically.
Todani Classication Type I Dilatation of the extrahepatic bile duct.
Type Ia Cystic dilatation of the common bile duct. Type Ib Saccular dilatation of the common bile duct. Type Ic Fusiform dilatation extending to the common bile
duct.
Type II Diverticulum of the common bile duct. Type III Choledochocele involving intraduodenal por-
tion of CBD.
Type IV Intra- and extrahepatic duct dilatation.
Type IVa Both intra- and extrahepatic cysts. Type IVb Multiple extrahepatic cysts only.
Type V Intrahepatic cysts only (Caroli disease) (Fig.13.2).
Jiahong Dong etal. proposed a new classication method based on the cyst location and pathological features in the biliary tree, referred to as Dong’s classication (Dong etal.
2013).
Type A2 Cystic dilatation of the bile duct was diffused to
the entire intrahepatic biliary tree.
Type B Cystic dilation of central large intrahepatic bile
duct above the hilar convergence.
Type B1 Single localized form limited to one hepatic
lobe.
Type B2 Cystic dilation in hilar convergence or in bi-lobar
central bile ducts.
Type C Cystic dilatation of the extrahepatic bile duct.
Type C1 Without intrapancreatic bile duct involvement. Type C2 With intrapancreatic bile duct involvement.
Type D Cystic dilation involving both the intra- and the
extrahepatic bile ducts.
Type D1 Cystic dilation limited to one lobe. Type D2 Cystic dilation expanded to bi-lobar bile ducts.
Type E Cystic dilation of the distal common bile duct.
13.3 Imaging Diagnosis ofBiliary Dilatation
The imaging diagnosis is helpful in determining the extent of involvement and the degree of dilation of the diseased bile duct, as well as the structure of the biliary and pancreatic duct, which can provide a basis for the evaluation of patient’s condition, formulation of the treatment plan and selection of the surgical procedure.
Dong’s Classication Type A Cystic dilatation of the peripheral biliary tree limited
to the intrahepatic bile ducts.
Type A1 Cystic dilatation of the bile duct was limited to
one hepatic lobe or several segments.
I AI BI

13.3.1 Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography (US) is noninvasive and accurate, with specicity as high as 97%, by which the adjacent liver and
I
Fig. 13.1 Diagram of Todani classication of BD (provided by Yan Jiayan, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
13 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofBiliary Dilatation
313
Fig. 13.2 Imaging of BD
pancreas can be displayed; from which the degree and range of the dilatation of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts can be determined. US has become the currently pre­ferred imaging method. Todani classication: type II biliary cysts and Caroli’s disease are apparent by ultrasound imag­ing. The typical US show “cysts” in the common bile duct, most of which are spherical, oval, or fusiform, and can extend to the hilar of the liver or the head of the pancreas, presenting with a clearly bounded cystic anechoic area. This area is connected to the common bile duct, associated with no or slight dilatation of the proximal bile duct. The cyst is distributed along the main branch of the bile duct and merged with the hepatic portal. The cyst presents a round or fusiform non-echoic area; those which present as “lotus root gan­glion” located in the ventral side of the portal vein and the intrahepatic bile duct with bead dilatation are the manifesta­tion of Caroli’s disease. When complicated with calculi, strong echoic masses are seen in the anechoic area of the bile duct, accompanied by an acoustic shadow, and the position of the bile duct can be moved. When malignant change occurs in the choledochal cyst, it can be seen that the cyst protrudes from the cystic wall to the cystic lumen, presenting an irregular hyperechoic mass or local thickening of the cys­tic wall. Real-time dynamic observation of the changes of the bile duct wall is of great value for early detection of car­cinogenesis. Choledochal cyst and extrahepatic cystadenoma
can be differentiated by ultrasound without intracavitary separation.
Despite the advantages of ultrasonography mentioned above, US can neither display the entire appearance of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and the main pancre­atic duct, nor distinguish the tissue structure around the bile duct and the area of conuence of the pancreatic duct and the bile duct. The reason is that US is susceptible to intra­abdominal intestinal gas interference and the limits of the orientation of an ultrasound section. The accuracy of ultraso­nography cannot adequately meet the needs of clinical diag­nosis, so it is of limited help in the development of surgical plans.
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a combination of ultrasonography and endoscopy. It can acquire histological features of the pipeline and ultrasound images of adjacent organs. EUS can directly scan the hepatic hilus and the lower part of the common bile duct through the duodenal bulb and descending part; and can display the pancreaticobiliary junc­tion and the diseased bile duct.

13.3.2 Multi-Slice CT

With the clinical popularization of submillimeter CT, Multi­Slice Computer Tomography (MSCT) has signicantly
314
J. Yang et al.
improved in terms of spatial and temporal resolution. Through MRCT, the size, shape, and extent of cysts can be displayed clearly; also, the relationship between the cysts and their surrounding structures, as well as the complications and signs conducive to the diagnosis of this disease can be well displayed. For example, “central dot” sign: small dotted soft tissue shadow in cystic shadow, whose density is lower or equal to that of liver parenchyma on the plain scan. This “central dot” is the imaging of the intrahepatic portal vein branch, which was previously considered to be a specic sign for the diagnosis of Caroli’s disease; however, some scholars believe that this sign can also be seen in the dilated bile duct after obstruction. Therefore, the diagnosis should be combined with other comprehensive analyses. The “bead­ing sign,” or “tadpole sign”: intrahepatic biliary cysts appear as multiple circular water-like density lesions, with mildly dilated bile ducts and saccular lesions intermingling with each other or on their margins. This disproportionate dilation and its characteristics with normal bile ducts are the keys to differentiate biliary cysts from obstructive biliary dilatation, which is manifested as a gradual thinning ratio from the cen­ter to the periphery. The “beading sign,” or “tadpole sign” is valuable in the diagnosis of Caroli’s disease (Park et al.
2005). Contrast-enhanced CT examination showed that the
tumor nodule in the bile duct wall protruded into the lumen is signicantly enhanced, which is the basis for the diagnosis of BD canceration (Fig.13.3).
Intravenous injection of cholestyramine for enhanced contrast spiral CT cholangiography (IVC-SCT) is useful in determining the relationship between cysts and bile ducts. Meanwhile, the three-dimensional images of the biliary tract and its surrounding anatomical structure can be obtained by image post-processing, which provides valu-
Fig. 13.3 Contrast-enhanced CT scan showing an enhanced nodular shadow about 2cm in diameter on the wall of the choledochal cyst, sug­gesting the carcinogenesis of the cyst (arrow)
able information for the selection of treatment schemes. If there is a communication between the cyst and the bile duct, the resolution of CT is sufcient to show the accumulation of contrast media in the cyst, thus making a denite diagno­sis of the choledochal cyst. However, the display of cholan­giography needs a contrast agent to be discharged into the bile duct. The results of the MSCT can be affected when BD is complicated with obstructive jaundice and cholangitis. Stockberger etal. (Yu etal. 2004) found that the develop­ment rate of the bile duct was only 25% when the level of serum bilirubin was higher than 34μmol/L; while the devel­opment rate of the bile duct was 93% when the level was less than 34μmol/L.At the same time, the incapability of CT to clearly display the detailed characteristics of the dis­tal common bile duct and pancreaticobiliary duct conu­ence brought certain difculties to the formulation of the operation plan.
Although CT has the advantages of a high diagnosis rate, moderate cost, and minimal invasiveness, an allergic reac­tion may occur because of the need for intravenous injection of contrast agent. Also, the patient is instructed to hold his breath during the examination, which is often impossible for children under the age of 5years, especially for infants, and artifacts are prone to be produced, thus reducing the efcacy of the examination.
13.3.3 ERCP andPTC
As diagnostic and therapeutic methods for the nal diagnosis of BD, ERCP, and PTC can be used to classify BD accu­rately, so that the structure of the biliary and pancreatic duct, and the shape and extent of the cyst can be clearly displayed. They can also be used to judge the presence of cholangiopan­creatic stones, strictures, and carcinogenesis, as well as to determine the distal bile duct and Todani classication: the anatomical relationship between extrahepatic part and the pancreatic duct of type I biliary cyst and type IVa cyst con­rmed the existence of abnormal pancreaticobiliary junc­tion. It is critical to determine the anatomical location of the conuence of the cholangiopancreatic duct because this plays a crucial role in the avoidance of injury to the pancre­atic duct during the excision of the cyst to facilitate the dis­covery of stones in the common bile duct or conuence, and to remove distal tumors.
ERCP is most suitable for adult patients without cholangio- intestinal anastomosis. It can highlight the conu­ence of the pancreatic duct and the bile duct through the ampulla and can also be used to determine whether there is cancer by biopsy or cytological examination of the cells (Fig. 13.4). The symptom of severe cholangitis can be relieved either by the removal of stones in the cyst through the incision of the duodenal papilla, or by the placement of
13 Digital Surgical Diagnosis andManagement ofBiliary Dilatation
Fig. 13.4 ERCP clearly showing the shape and extent of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and cysts, and suggesting that the patient has an abnormal conuence of the pancreatic bile ducts
temporary endoscopic stents before the operation. In patients with portal hypertension, the esophagus and stomach fundus can be examined by endoscopy. All branches and cavities of the bile duct should be examined during ERCP, and cystic wall biopsies should be performed, if necessary, to exclude the possibility of malignancy. The use of balloon blockage ensures that the bile duct tree is adequately lled with con­trast media, especially for patients who have previously undergone cyst-duodenostomy. ERCP is the rst choice for the diagnosis of Todani III type cyst or choledochal cyst because the incision of the duodenal papilla under endoscope has particular therapeutic value.
Although the diversity of ERCP has reduced the use of PTC, it is still an important diagnostic and therapeutic tech­nique in biliary surgery. Patients with previous Roux-en-Y cyst jejunostomy or hepaticojejunostomy are considered for PTC.Besides, PTC is also suitable for the patient with type IV choledochal cyst when the intrahepatic choledochal cyst cannot be well displayed by ERCP due to biliary stric­ture or tumor. Percutaneous biliary drainage after PTC or biliary tract support after choledochojejunostomy can be performed to control sepsis caused by biliary tract infec­tion. The role of PTC is limited when extensive cyst-jeju­nostomy prevents local preservation of the cyst and affects the complete display of the cyst, or when a giant extrahe-
315
Fig. 13.5 PTC diagnosed a case of type IV BD, but showed poor results in the lower end of the common bile duct and at the conuence of the biliary and pancreatic ducts
patic bile duct cyst overlaps with the pancreaticobiliary junction, which makes the identication of related struc­tures difcult (Fig.13.5).
PTC and ERCP have both advantages and disadvantages for the diagnosis of BD. Both methods are invasive and require a large amount of contrast media to display the bile duct completely. Complications such as bleeding, bile leak­age, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis may occur. Although ERCP can conrm the existence of abnormal pan­creaticobiliary juxtaposition, its clinical application has been dramatically limited because it is invasive, and children often need to be intubated under general anesthesia, but 3% to 10% of intubation fails.
13.3.4 Magnetic Resonance
Cholangiopancreatography
The purpose of Magnetic Resonance hydrography (MR hydrog­raphy) can be achieved by restraining the tissue signal around the biliary tract through a T2 weighted imaging technique to highlight the signal of water- bearing biliary tract; a stereoscopic image of the cholangiopancreatic duct system can be obtained by the three-dimensional reconstruction of the image data through a computer. The advantages are as follows:
• The full view of the biliary tree and the abnormal connec-
tion of the lower part of the pancreaticobiliary duct related
to the etiology of the disease can be clearly and stereo-
scopically displayed free from the inuence of pressure
factors when the contrast agent is injected (Lee et al.
2009a, b).
316
J. Yang et al.
• MRCP is a noninvasive examination, that is safe and com­fortable, with no radiation damage, which is easy to oper­ate on.
• It is not affected by anatomic structural changes after surgery.
• There are no complications such as biliary infection and acute pancreatitis.
• The reconstructed images can be observed in multi-angle and multi-axial positions, and the lesions can be displayed stereoscopically and more intuitively.
• It is suitable for patients who cannot tolerate ERCP and children who cannot cooperate with the examination.
Compared with direct cholangiography, MRCP provides
an equivalent or even superior BD imaging method, which can provide accurate anatomical development for infants and adults, and a reliable basis for surgical treatment. The dilated bile duct could be cystic, columnar, or diverticular, with high signal intensity on MRCP images. In cases complicated with stones, low signal lling defects could be observed against the background of high signal intensity. For Caroli’s disease, MRCP is currently considered to be the only ideal diagnostic method that can show normal bile ducts and cylindrical, cys­tic, or spindle-shaped dilated bile ducts, as well as the com­munication between the cystic lumen and the intrahepatic bile duct. This sign is a characteristic manifestation of the diagnosis of this disease (Fig.13.6). In the case of cholangio­carcinoma, nodular parenchyma, asymmetric stricture of the bile duct, or truncation of bile duct are observed in MRI transverse axis and MRCP.
Fig. 13.6 MRCP showing the presence of a bile duct cyst and an abnormal connection of the lower segment of the pancreatic bile duct associated with the etiology of the disease
ERCP has the possibility of over-evaluating the degree of bile duct stenosis, and the gas and pulsatile vascular artifacts in the gastrointestinal tract can cause pseudo-stricture of the bile duct. Meanwhile, MRCP is insensitive to mild stenosis and micro-calculi and is susceptible to volumetric effects and motion artifacts. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the original image and conventional sequence images carefully to provide a reliable diagnostic basis for the formulation of a clinical operation plan.
The anatomical structure of the pancreatic duct and chol­angiopancreatic junction in MRCP is inferior to that of ERCP.However, with the improvement of MRI resolution, the limitations of MRI imaging in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct conuence have been steadily reduced.

13.3.5 Intraoperative Cholangiography

Signicant advances in the understanding of BD disease have revealed the truth that routine examinations may not meet the display needs for some specic diseases. However, intraoperative cholangiography can make up for the deciency.
Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) can clearly display the shape of the common bile duct, especially the shape and location of the distal common bile duct. Understanding the shape of the intrahepatic bile duct and whether it is compli­cated with intrahepatic bile duct dilatation can sometimes help discover the rare vagal bile duct and complicated biliary malformation. Thus, the operation supplemented by cholan­giography can effectively reduce postoperative complica­tions (Liu etal. 2007).
For patients with Todani type IVa, if only extrahepatic cysts are resected, without sufcient and adequate drainage of intrahepatic cysts, 23%–40% of the cases have postopera­tive complications such as recurrent cholangitis and liver abscess (Chijiiwa and Koga 1993). The reasons are related to cholestasis and biliary tract infection caused by relative ste­nosis of the intrahepatic bile duct at the opening of the com­mon hepatic duct or membranous stenosis and septal stenosis. Intraoperative cholangiography can help to show the type and extent of intrahepatic bile duct stenosis. Intrahepatic cholangioplasty and high hepatic duct jejunostomy were per­formed according to the stenosis.
However, IOC may have false-positive and false-negative results. If the injection of contrast media is insufcient, the intrahepatic bile duct will not ll; or the bubbles, mucus blocks, and blood clots in the bile duct may cause diagnostic doubts in the course of reading the radiographs. At this time, judgments should be made based on choledochoscopic observation, a bile duct probe for intrahepatic bile duct and distal common bile duct exploration, and intraoperative observation, to improve diagnostic accuracy.