Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
508
V. Kubihal et al.
41.5 Cordocentesis andFetal Blood Transfusion
Cordocentesis, also called as percutaneous umbilical cord blood sampling, is a method of obtaining fetal blood by plac­ing a thin needle in the umbilical vein close to the placental insertion site, under ultrasound guidance [13, 14]. Apart from diagnostic blood sampling, it can also be used for administer­ing medications and intrauterine blood transfusions [15].
41.5.1 Indications [1519]
1) Diagnosis and treatment of severe fetal anemia—most
common indication.
2) Diagnosis of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.
Cordocentesis can also be used for response assessment following maternal intravenous immunoglobulin admin­istration; however, it is generally not recommended when vaginal delivery is not under consideration.
3) Evaluation of non-immune fetal hydrops—when maternal
serum markers, ultrasound evaluation, and amniocentesis are negative, and middle cerebral artery PSV is elevated.
4) Historical or rare indications include:
• Karyotyping in suspected fetal aneuploidy.
• Diagnosis of genetic disorders such as thalassemia, hemophilia, etc.
• Identication of fetal blood type and platelet antigen.
• Serum markers for various fetal diseases such as fetal infection and fetal thyroid function.
• Administration of medication, for example, in fetal supraventricular tachycardia, when maternal systemic therapy fails.
41.5.2 Contraindications [2023]
There are no absolute contraindications. Relative contraindi­cations include:
1) Certain maternal viral infections including human immu­nodeciency virus infection and hepatitis virus, due to the theoretical risk of vertical transmission.
2) Early gestation age, due to greater technical difculty, and increased complication rate.
perform in an operation theatre, or a room close to it, should the need for emergency cesarean delivery arise. Prophylactic steroids can be considered prior to the pro­cedure if cordocentesis is performed between 24 and 34weeks of gestation.
• Strict aseptic precautions are to be followed including antibacterial preparation of skin.
• The procedure is commonly performed under local anesthesia.
• Ultrasound guidance is used.
• The procedure can be performed with either freehand technique or using a needle guide.
• Often, a 20 or 22G lumbar puncture needle is used. The gauge and length of the needle used can vary with the maternal body habitus, gestational age, and distance of the target from the skin.
• Sampling sites—Common sampling sites of the umbilical vein used include:
– Placental insertion site—most commonly used tech-
nique. It allows stable needle access, especially when the placenta is placed anteriorly. However, there is a risk of contamination of maternal blood. Fetal origin can be conrmed by high mean corpuscular volume, or
Kleihauer Betke test. – Free loop of umbilical cord. – Abdominal insertion site. – Intrahepatic vein—intrahepatic segment of umbilical
vein or left portal vein is accessed.
Umbilical artery puncture should be avoided, as this may
cause vasoconstriction and fetal bradycardia.
• Some authors advise using heparin following access into the umbilical vein, prior to fetal blood sampling, to pre­vent clot at the access site.
• Paralytic agents such as pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium are generally recommended when large­volume paracentesis is required or when excess fetal motion makes the procedure difcult. It is generally not advised when cordocentesis is done for diagnostic pur­poses, or when placenta and cord insertion are anterior.
• In case of fetal anemia, blood is sent for assessment of hemoglobin level or hematocrit, to decide the amount of blood required for intrauterine transfusion.
• Once fetal blood sampling or intrauterine transfusion is over, the needle is withdrawn.
• During the procedure, the fetal heart can be intermittently evaluated by direct ultrasound evaluation.
41.5.3 Technique [15, 23]
• There is insufcient evidence to recommend the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to cordocentesis.
• There is no consensus regarding where to perform the procedure, whether in an ultrasound room, clinic, or an operation theatre. But, it is generally recommended to
41.5.4 Complications [15, 23, 24]
• Access site bleed—seen in nearly 20–30% of cases. Usually self-limited.
• Vertical transmission of maternal infection—limited data on estimated risk.
41 Female Genital Tract andObstetric Interventions
509
• Abnormal fetal heart rate—bradycardia can be seen in nearly 5–10% of cases, often transient, and resolve in 5min.
• Pregnancy loss is seen in 1.3% of patients. It can be higher if there are associated fetal hydrops, structural fetal anom­alies, severe growth restriction, or placental penetration.
• Other complications include amniotic uid infection, pre­mature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, placental abruption, and alloimmunization.
41.5.5 Outcome [23]
Technical success is high in experienced hands (~97–98.5%). The survival rate after intrauterine transfusion for fetal allo­immunization depends on gestation age at rst presentation and the presence and severity of fetal hydrops, and generally is between 80 and 95%.
41.6 Selective Fetal Reduction inTwin
Pregnancy
Monochorionic twins can be associated with unique angioar­chitecture characterized by connections between the vascu­lature of both fetuses, with net dynamic bidirectional blood ow between fetuses. This can lead to complications that are unique to monochorionic twins and include twin-twin trans­fusion syndrome, twin reverse arterial perfusion sequence, severe intra-uterine growth restriction, and severe discordant twins. In many circumstances, particularly when there is impending fetal death of one twin, selective fetal termination of the abnormal twin may be required, to increase the chances of survival of the normal twin [2528].
Selective intravascular potassium chloride injection into
abnormal twins is not recommended in monochorionic preg­nancy, as there is a chance of embolization into normal twins through existing vascular connections [26]. Also, acute exsanguination of the normal twin can occur in the dead twin through patent vascular connections [26]. Therefore, selec­tive feticide of the abnormal twin in monochorionic preg­nancy is performed through selective and complete occlusion of the umbilical cord which cuts off blood supply to the abnormal twin and also prevents exsanguination of the nor­mal twin through placental vascular connections [26].
Common methods of umbilical cord occlusion include
bipolar cord coagulation, laser cord coagulation, cord liga­tion, and radiofrequency cord ablation (RFA) [2527]. Bipolar cord occlusion has been the suggested gold standard procedure for umbilical cord occlusion [26]. However, bipo­lar cord coagulation, laser cord coagulation, and cord liga-
tion require the insertion of large diameter operating instruments through the bore of 3.8 mm operative sleeve, which is associated with a higher risk of premature rupture of membranes, bleeding complication, and preterm labor [25]. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) is a relatively new, less invasive technique that can be performed using smaller access (17 gauge or 1.4 mm probe) to ablate the umbilical cord by generating high tem­peratures at the site of application [27, 29]. Although there is a decrease in premature rupture of the membrane with RFA, it is associated with a lower overall survival rate of normal twin [27], probably related to the longer duration RFA takes to stop blood ow in the umbilical cord which exposes nor­mal twin to longer duration altered hemodynamics, com­pared to umbilical cord coagulation that causes more instantaneous, and complete blood ow cessation. Thus, the goal of RFA should be rapid application of high temperature to achieve quicker, and complete coagulation [25].
41.6.1 Technique
To reduce the risk of procedure-related pregnancy loss, oral indomethacin may be given prior to the procedure. The pro­cedure is performed with the patient in supine position. The abdomen is cleaned and draped. Local anesthesia is given along with conscious sedation. Under continuous USG guid­ance, the RFA probe is inserted percutaneously, through the uterus, into the abdominal segment of the umbilical cord of abnormal fetus. Care is taken to avoid the placenta and amni­otic sac of normal twin. It is recommended that the RFA probe should be placed at least 1 cm from the area not intended to ablate. Once the RFA probe is centered within the abdominal segment of the umbilical cord, across the umbilical vein (target vessel), radiofrequency energy is applied with a diameter range of ~2 cm, and temperature reaching up to 100–110 °C for the duration of 1–3 mins. USG/Doppler is performed to conrm the cessation of blood ow within the umbilical cord and to conrm cardiac asys­tole of the target fetus. USG can be performed 24h post pro­cedure, to evaluate surviving normal fetus, placenta, and amniotic uid volume [3032].
41.6.2 Complications
Serious maternal complications are rare and can include cho­rioamnionitis, sepsis, hemorrhage, bodily injury, and mater­nal death. Fetal complications include thermal injury to normal surviving twin, fetal demise of co-twin, premature rupture of membrane, and preterm labor [31, 32].
510
V. Kubihal et al.
41.7 Fetoscopic Laser Ablation (FLA)
ofPlacental Anastomosis
Twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is a unique compli­cation of monochorionic pregnancy, where unidirectional inter-fetal transfusion through placental vascular anastomo­sis results in oligohydramnios in the donor twin, and polyhy­dramnios in the recipient twin. Fetoscopic laser ablation (FLA) of causative anastomotic vessels is the treatment of choice for TTTS [33, 34].
Non-selective FLA involves ablation of all the vessels
that cross the intertwin membrane. This technique was asso­ciated with high procedure-related fetal loss of 15–50%, probably related to ablation of normal chorionic vessels at the intertwin membrane in addition to culprit anastomotic vessels [34]. Selective FLA involves precise and selective ablation of anastomotic vessels at the intertwin membrane. Selective FLA is associated with lower rate of fetal loss of ~5.6% [33]. Sequential selective FLA involves precise and selection ablation of placental anastomoses in an orderly manner starting with donor-to-recipient arterio-venous anas­tomoses, followed by donor-to-recipient veno-arterial anas­tomoses, and then uncommon arterio-arterial and veno-venous anastomoses. In comparison with selective FLA, sequential selective FLA is associated with reduction in fetal loss by 50–60% [33]. Solomon technique is a rela­tively new technique where in addition to selective or sequen­tial selective FLA, supercial ablation of the placental vascular equator is done, thus clinically dechorionizing the placenta. The placental vascular equator is dened as an imaginary plane drawn mid-way and perpendicular to the line joining the placental cord insertion of both the twins [35]. This technique reduced the recurrence of TTTS, and twin reverse arterial perfusion sequence following primary laser ablation in TTTS [33, 36].
ered a relative contraindication for FLA, due to large inter­twin anastomotic vessels directly arising from the umbilical cord [33].
FLA is often performed as an outpatient procedure. The patient is placed in supine position. The patient’s abdomen is cleaned and draped. The procedure is performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. After USG mapping, a fetoscope is introduced through the maternal abdomen into the recipient’s amniotic sac, at the site where it provides the best access to the placental vascular equator. A 10–12G can­nula is introduced percutaneously or through mini­laparotomy, under continuous USG guidance. This provides access to a 2–3.6mm fetoscope. Once inside the recipient’s amniotic sac, both the fetuses are inspected for any gross malformation or discordant pallor. The intertwin membrane is then identied, and vessels are traced back to origin from the intertwin membrane to identify and conrm anastomotic vessels. Selective ablation of anastomotic vessels is done at intertwin membrane using 400–650mm laser ber (20–40W with ND-YAG or diode laser). In addition, the Solomon tech­nique is often performed where supercial laser ablation of the placental vascular equator is also ablated. Once the abla­tion is completed, amnioreduction of the recipient is often done to normalize amniotic uid volume [33].
41.7.3 Complications
Periprocedural complications are common following FLA.Premature rupture of the membrane is the most com­mon complication seen in over 30% of cases before 34weeks. Chorio-amnion separation is seen in more than 20% of cases. Other complications include amniotic uid leak (seen in ~7% of cases), vaginal bleed (in ~4% of cases), abruption (in ~2% of cases), chorioamnionitis (in ~2% of cases), and con­strictive amniotic bands (2%) [33].
41.7.1 Contraindications
FLA is contraindicated in patients with active vaginal bleed­ing, sub-chorionic hematoma, chorio-amnion separation, preterm premature rupture of membrane, and active labor. Short cervix and TTTS with discordant malformed twins are considered relative contraindications at certain centers [33].
41.7.2 Technique
Preprocedural USG can be done to identify the placental cord insertion site. Short distance of <5cm between the cord insertion sites of both twins is associated with a technically more difcult procedure. And distance of <1cm is consid-
41.8 Thoracocentesis andThoracoamniotic
Shunt
Large pleural effusion, or cystic intrathoracic lesion, can be associated with lung hypoplasia and sometimes fetal hydrops. Thoracocentesis and thoracoamniotic shunt allow lung re-expansion in these patients, and appropriate lung development [28, 37, 38]. Primary hydrothorax is often chy­lous in nature and can be managed with thoracocentesis and thoracoamniotic shunt. The procedure is usually performed in the second trimester, up to 32 weeks of gestation. Secondary hydrothorax, which occurs in fetal hydrops, is often bilateral, and is not an indication for intervention [28,
3740].
41 Female Genital Tract andObstetric Interventions
511
41.8.1 Technique
The procedure is often done under maternal local or epi­dural anesthesia. Intramuscular injection of vecuronium can be used to reduce fetal movement during the procedure. Prophylactic antibiotic use can be considered. The access site is cleaned and draped. An 18G 20cm needle is used to enter the fetal thorax. Ultrasound guidance and transabdom­inal transuterine approach are used. Care to be taken to avoid the placenta and umbilical cord. Thoracoamniotic shunt can be placed in the initial setting, or on follow-up if there is rapid reaccumulation. Often, thoracocentesis is per­formed initially. After the lung expands, the underlying fetal chest is to be evaluated for any lung abnormality. The fetus should be evaluated after 1–3days, to look for rapid reac­cumulation of pleural effusion, if present, thoracoamniotic shunt can be considered. After needle access into the tho­racic cavity, stiff/rosen wire is introduced into the thoracic cavity. A 6f peel- away sheath can be placed to allow stable access during the procedure. A double pigtail catheter can be with one tip in the fetal pleural effusion and another in the amniotic uid. This allows continuous decompression of pleural uid into amniotic uid. Color Doppler can be used to access the ow of uid across the shunt. Over several minutes, drainage of fetal uid was accessed, and the return of the fetal heart position to midline was conrmed. The mother is called for weekly follow-up, and is accessed by ultrasonography or MRI for shunt function, and fetus health [28, 37, 3941].
41.8.2 Complications
• Fetal hemothorax—seen an echogenic content with pleu­ral uid.
• Re-accumulation of fetal hydrothorax.
• Mispositioned, dislodged, or blocked shunt—Dislodged shunt is typically within the amniotic cavity, and need not be retrieved prior to delivery [28, 37, 3941].
41.9.1 Technique
The procedure is often done under maternal local or epidural anesthesia. Intramuscular injection of vecuronium can be used to reduce fetal movement during the procedure. Prophylactic antibiotic use can be considered. The access site is cleaned and draped. An 18G 20cm needle is used to enter the fetal thorax. Ultrasound guidance and transabdomi­nal transuterine approach is used. Care to be taken to avoid placenta and umbilical vessels. Umbilical arteries can be seen to course along the lateral bladder wall. Vesicocentesis is performed to decompress the urinary bladder. Serial vesi­cocentesis is done to assess renal function and urine produc­tion. If salvageable renal function is identied, bladder decompression should be considered. A double pigtail cath­eter can be with one tip in the urinary bladder and another in the amniotic uid. This allows continuous decompression of the urinary bladder into amniotic uid. Color Doppler can be used to access the ow of uid across shunt. Simultaneous amnio-infusion can be considered in the case of severe oligo­hydramnios [28, 37, 42, 43].
41.9.2 Complications [28, 44, 45]
• Hemorrhage.
• Mispositioned or dislodged shunt. Sometimes, the amni­otic end of the shunt may get retracted into the fetal abdo­men and can lead to urinary ascites.
• Long-term outcome.
– Vesicoamniotic shunt can interfere with bladder func-
tion leading to spastic urinary bladder, vesicoureteric reux, and hydroureteronephrosis.
– Although vesicoamniotic shunt is seen to improve
amniotic uid volume, and pulmonary function, the effect on improvement of renal function is marginal. Most children will eventually require dialysis and renal transplantation.
41.9 Vesicocentesis andVesicoamniotic Shunt
The common cause of lower urinary tract obstruction is the posterior urethral valve in males, and rarely, can be due to urethral atresia. It is associated with overdistended bladder and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis. Untreated lower urinary tract obstruction can lead to irreversible renal damage, and oligohydramnios that can cause fetal lung hypoplasia. Vesicocentesis and vesicoamniotic shunt help to decompress the high-pressure urinary system and allow accumulation of amniotic uid [28, 37, 42, 43].

References

1. Shen HL, Yang PQ, Du LD, Lü WC, Tian Y.Horseshoe kidney with retrocaval ureter: one case report. Chin Med J. 2012;125(3):543–5.
2. Knuttinen MG, Jajko R, Scoccia B. Fluoroscopic tubal recana­lization in tubal factor related infertility. Semin Interv Radiol. 2014;31(03):269–71.
3. Lopera J, Suri R, Kroma GM, Garza-Berlanga A, Thomas J.Role of interventional procedures in obstetrics/gynecology. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013;51(6):1049–66.
4. Weston M, Soyer P, Barral M, Dohan A, Pierre S, Rabei R, etal. Role of interventional procedures in obstetrics and gynecology. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020;58(2):445–62.
5. Jummaat F, Ahmad S, Mohamed Ismail NA. 5-Year review on amniocentesis and its maternal fetal complications. Horm
512
V. Kubihal et al.
Mol Biol Clin Investig [Internet]. 2019 Nov 26 [cited 2022 Feb 27];40(2). Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/
doi/10.1515/hmbci- 2019- 0006/html.
6. Carlson LM, Vora NL.Prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2017;44(2):245–56.
7. Jindal A, Sharma M, Chaudhary C.Amniocentesis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK559247/.
8. Alrevic Z, Navaratnam K, Mujezinovic F.Amniocentesis and cho­rionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2017 Sep 4 [cited 2022 Feb 27];2017(9). Available from:
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2.
9. Nizard J. Amniocentesis: technique and education. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(2):152–4.
10. Ndumbe FM, Navti O, Chilaka VN, Konje JC. Prenatal diag­nosis in the rst trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63(5):317–28.
11. Jones TM, Montero FJ.Chorionic Villus Sampling. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK563301/.
12. Wojcik MH, Reimers R, Poorvu T, Agrawal PB.Genetic diagnosis in the fetus. J Perinatol. 2020;40(7):997–1006.
13. Sasahara J, Ishii K, Fujikawa E, Mitsuda N.Current status of percu­taneous umbilical cord blood sampling in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(9):1821–7.
14. Peddi NC, Avanthika C, Vuppalapati S, Balasubramanian R, Kaur J, Chaithanya Datta N.A Review of Cordocentesis: Percutaneous Umbilical Cord Blood Sampling. Cureus [Internet]. 2021 Jul 16 [cited 2024 Mar 5]; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/
articles/63501- a- review- of- cordocentesis- percutaneous- umbilical­cord- blood- sampling.
15. Berry SM, Stone J, Norton ME, Johnson D, Berghella V. Fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(3):170–80.
16. Nicolaides KH, Thilaganathan B, Rodeck CH, Mibashan RS. Erythroblastosis and reticulocytosis in anemic fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(5):1063–5.
17. Bussel JB, Berkowitz RL, Hung C, Kolb EA, Wissert M, Primiani A, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage in alloimmune thrombocytope­nia: stratied management to prevent recurrence in the subsequent affected fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(2):135.e1–135.e14.
18. Mcquilten ZK, Wood EM, Savoia H, Cole S. A review of patho­physiology and current treatment for neonatal alloimmune throm­bocytopenia (NAIT) and introducing the Australian NAIT registry: neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51(3):191–8.
19. Santo S, Mansour S, Thilaganathan B, Homfray T, Papageorghiou A, Calvert S, etal. Prenatal diagnosis of non-immune hydrops feta­lis: what do we tell the parents? Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(2):186–95.
20. Voto LS, Mathet ER, Zapaterio JL, Orti J, Lede RL, Margulies M. High-dose gammaglobulin (IVIG) followed by intrauterine transfusions (IUTs): a new alternative for the treatment of severe fetal hemolytic disease. JPME. 1997;25(1):85–8.
21. Ruma MS, Moise KJ, Kim E, Murtha AP, Prutsman WJ, Hassan SS, etal. Combined plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin for the treatment of severe maternal red cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(2):138.e1–6.
22. Van Kamp IL, Klumper FJCM, Oepkes D, Meerman RH, Scherjon SA, Vandenbussche FPHA, et al. Complications of intrauterine intravascular transfusion for fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):171–7.
23. Too G, Berkowitz RL. Cordocentesis and Fetal Transfusion. In: Obstetric Imaging: Fetal Diagnosis and Care [Internet]. Elsevier; 2018 [cited 2024 Mar 6]. p. 475–478.e1. Available from: https://
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323445481001121.
24. Lindenburg ITM, Van Kamp IL, Oepkes D. Intrauterine blood transfusion: current indications and associated risks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(4):263–71.
25. Bebbington MW, Danzer E, Moldenhauer J, Khalek N, Johnson MP. Radiofrequency ablation vs bipolar umbilical cord coagula­tion in the management of complicated monochorionic pregnan­cies: RFA vs BCC in management of monochorionic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(3):319–24.
26. Rossi AC, D’Addario V.Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feti­cide in complicated monochorionic twins: a systematic review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(2):123–9.
27. Gaerty K, Greer RM, Kumar S.Systematic review and metaanaly­sis of perinatal outcomes after radiofrequency ablation and bipo­lar cord occlusion in monochorionic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):637–43.
28. Jha P, Feldstein VA, Revzin MV, Katz DS, Moshiri M. Role of imaging in obstetric interventions: criteria, considerations, and complications. Radiographics. 2021;41(4):E1243–64.
29. Xie J, Cheng Z, Wu T, Wei Y, Wang X.Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China: protocol for a pilot ran­domised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e034995.
30. Wang HM, Li HY, Wang XT, Wang YY, Li L, Liang B, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for selective reduction in complex mono­chorionic multiple pregnancies: a case series. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(6):740–4.
31. Rahimi-Sharbaf F, Ghaemi M, Nassr AA, Shamshirsaz AA, Shirazi M.Radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction in compli­cated Monochorionic twins; comparing the outcomes according to the indications. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):189.
32. Abdel-Sattar M, Chon AH, Llanes A, Korst LM, Ouzounian JG, Chmait RH. Comparison of umbilical cord occlusion methods: radiofrequency ablation versus laser photocoagulation. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(2):110–6.
33. Johnson A.Diagnosis and management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(3):611–31.
34. Wee LY, Fisk NM. The twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7(3):187–202.
35. van Gemert MJ, Umur A, Tijssen JG, Ross MG.Twin-twin transfu­sion syndrome: etiology, severity and rational management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13(2):193–206.
36. Dhillon RK, Hillman SC, Pounds R, Morris RK, Kilby MD.Comparison of Solomon technique with selective laser abla­tion for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review: Solomon technique vs selective ablation for TTTS. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(5):526–33.
37. Johnson MP, Wilson RD. Shunt-based interventions: why, how, and when to place a shunt. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22(6):391–8.
38. Thompson PJ, Greenough A, Nicolaides KH.Respiratory function in infancy following pleuro-amniotic shunting. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993;8(2):79–83.
39. Kelly EN, Seaward G, Ye XY, Windrim R, Van Mieghem T, Keunen J, et al. Short- and long-term outcome following thoracoamni­otic shunting for fetal hydrothorax. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(4):624–30.
40. Matsui M, Takahashi Y, Iwagaki S, Asai K, Katsura D, Yasumi S, etal. Long-term outcomes of 92 cases of fetal hydrothorax includ­ing Thoracoamniotic shunting. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(1):60–5.
41 Female Genital Tract andObstetric Interventions
513
41. White SB, Tutton SM, Rilling WS, Kuhlmann RS, Peterson EL, Wigton TR, et al. Percutaneous in utero thoracoamniotic shunt creation for fetal thoracic abnormalities leading to nonimmune hydrops. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(6):889–94.
42. Baumgarten HD, Flake AW. Fetal Surgery. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2019;66(2):295–308.
43. Vinit N, Gueneuc A, Bessières B, Dreux S, Heidet L, Salomon R, etal. Fetal cystoscopy and Vesicoamniotic shunting in lower uri­nary tract obstruction: long-term outcome and current technical limitations. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(1):74–83.
44. Kurtz MP, Koh CJ, Jamail GA, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Shamshirsaz AA, Espinoza J, etal. Factors associated with fetal shunt dislodge­ment in lower urinary tract obstruction: fetal shunt dislodgement in LUTO.Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(8):720–5.
45. Moscardi PRM, Katsous CP, Jahromi M, Blachman-Braun R, DeFreitas MJ, Kozakowski K, etal. Prenatal renal parenchymal area as a predictor of early end-stage renal disease in children with vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):320.e1–6.
Breast Interventions: Biopsy andLocalization Techniques
EktaDhamija, PalakBhaveshPopat, andAnjumSyed
42
Key Messages
1. Image-guided breast interventions have become an inte­gral component of management protocol.
2. It majorly includes breast biopsy and preoperative lesion localization in order to guide surgical planning.
3. Unlike the rest of body, tissue sampling from breast lesions is performed using 14G core biopsy needle.
4. Although vacuum-assisted biopsy is as accurate as sur­gical biopsy, it has been reserved for selective indica­tions due to its higher cost and limited availability.
5. The role of radiologist extends beyond conducting biopsy and extends to verify radiological and pathologi­cal concordance which can affect the treatment plan.
6. Lesion localization assists the surgeon in the accurate removal of tissue which is not clinically palpable.
7. Most commonly localization is done with hookwire on the same day as surgery and therefore needs close com­munication between radiologists and surgeons.
8. Specimen radiograph of biopsy cores especially in case of microcalcication and post-wire tumour excision is an inevitable step to conrm appropriate targeting and adequate tissue removal.
9. Radiological breast interventions would also include tar­geted axillary nodal dissection, guide catheter placement for partial breast irradiation, palliative interventions for pain management, etc.
10. These interventions are minimally invasive and have sig­nicant role in patient management.
E. Dhamija (*) Department of Radiodiagnosis and Intervention Radiology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
P. B. Popat Department of Radiology, Tatal Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
A. Syed Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India e-mail: anjum.rd@aiimsrishikesh.edu.in

42.1 Introduction

Over the last few decades, we have witnessed a rapid increase in the incidence of breast cancer with variable outcomes in associated morbidity and mortality. Appropriate biopsy tech­nique for adequate sampling and good histopathological cor­relation is an integral component of early detection of breast cancer. Imaging has become an inevitable component of the diagnosis and management algorithm for these patients. The treatment depends largely on the histopathological diagnosis and classication depending on the receptor status for the particular subtype. The milieu in breast parenchyma is under constant inuence of hormonal changes, leading to physio­logical changes in development, proliferation, and involution along with a plethora of benign and hyperplastic cellular lesions. The thickness and adequacy of tissue core inuences the effectiveness of pathological evaluation. Image guidance offers real-time visualization of the biopsy needle and facili­tates accurate tissue sampling. USG also enables the radiolo­gist to distinguish solid from cystic components of the masses. Unfortunately, in resource constraint settings, palpation- guided biopsies are routinely performed for breast masses and are associated with high false negative rates and repeat biopsy rates.
In addition to the percutaneous biopsies, a dedicated interventional radiology setup is crucial for preoperative localization in non-palpable breast lesions and in cancers showing complete/near complete clinical response after che­motherapy. This chapter aims to highlight these elds where imaging has become an inseparable part of the management protocol.

42.2 Breast Biopsy

42.2.1 Imaging Modality andLesion Selection
The logical rule is to target a lesion on the modality that demonstrates the lesion best—it can be USG, mammogram
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 S. H. Chandrashekhara (ed.), Textbook of Interventional Radiology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9601-4_42
515
516
E. Dhamija et al.
(MG), or MRI.It thus becomes important to select the appro­priate lesion and modality for performing biopsy. The American College of Radiology (ACR) lexicon suggests that the lesions with morphological appearance falling in BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 need to be sampled to rule out malignancy. BI-RADS category 3 lesions can also be sampled if the patient or the physician is apprehensive or in patients with another primary malignancy that is prone to metastasize to the breast.
42.2.2 USG-Guided Biopsy [1, 2]
Unlike other body parts, breast biopsy is performed using a 14G automatic biopsy needle in routine practice, and 4–5 tissue cores are obtained for pathological evaluation. Non­image guided biopsy may be performed for large palpable masses, but USG guidance offers visualization of blood ves­sels and avoids necrotic component during sampling. This avoids potential haemorrhagic complications and increases the yield.
Technique Patient is placed in the supine position. For lat-
erally located lesions, an oblique decubitus position is used with a cushion or bolster underneath the elevated side for comfort. The lesion is visualized on USG and the tract for needle passage is planned avoiding any vessels and necrotic components. It is advisable to enter as close to the lesion for favourable surgical excision margins. For deep-seated lesions, alternative approaches such as skin entry from a dis­tant point keeping the needle parallel to the chest wall or
entering vertically and then ipping the needle horizontally to achieve a parallel course can be used to improve safety and efcacy (Fig.42.1). A small skin incision provides regu­lar edges for better wound healing after giving local anaes­thesia at the needle entry site. Automatic biopsy needles are more commonly used for breast biopsies and at least four tissue cores should be sent for histopathological analysis. A clip may be placed within the tumour based on the institu­tional practice. After the procedure, rm compression is pro­vided over the needle entry point and the lesion for a few minutes.
42.2.3 MG-Guided Biopsy [3, 4]
It is reserved for microcalcications, asymmetries, architec­tural distortions, and small masses detected only on MG with no USG correlate. MG-guided biopsies require an add-on unit called Stereotaxy [1, 5]. This can be performed with the patient in a sitting or prone position, the latter requiring a dedicated prone table that is space consuming. A prone table avoids the direct visualization of the procedure and the nee­dle by the patient, making it more comfortable for them. However, an upright position too is well tolerated once the patient is appropriately counselled about the procedure.
Technique After patient preparation, 0, +15, and −15 degree stereotactic paired view images are acquired. The x­and y-axis coordinates are visible, whereas the z-axis (depth estimation) is calculated by a software, from the parallax of the stereotactic images. The needle is placed in the holder.
a b
Fig. 42.1 USG-guided vacuum-assisted excision biopsy in a 26-year­old lady for BI-RADS 3 lesion. (a) shows the needle probe (white star) placed along the inferior aspect of the lesion in the longitudinal plane.
(b) shows axial section of the lesion with short axis of the needle seen well positioned in situ. It was proven to be a broadenoma which could be excised on outpatient basis without obvious scar, in a young female
42 Breast Interventions: Biopsy andLocalization Techniques
cde
517
h
f
A
B
Fig. 42.2 Stereotactic biopsy in a 47-year-old lady with suspicious microcalcication on mammogram. (A) shows a stereotactic vacuum­assisted biopsy unit attached to the mammography equipment contain­ing a sample needle probe and sample collecting chamber (B). The microcalcications can be identied on stereo scout (C) image and
Following the instillation of 2% lignocaine, the needle is inserted through the skin, up to the calculated depth and tis­sue cores are obtained. A specimen radiograph is important to demonstrate the presence of calcication within these cores (Fig.42.2). These can be marked or labelled to assist the pathologist for assessment.
g
paired +15 and 15 degree views (D, E) followed by inserted biopsy needle at the target site (F, G). The specimen radiograph conrms pres­ence of calcication within (H). Histopathological assessment con­rmed it to be an invasive breast carcinoma (ER+/ PR+/ Her2 neu+)
and there lies the need for CEM-guided biopsy. CEM biopsy units are now available making such occult lesions amenable to be targeted for obtaining tissue samples.
42.2.4 MRI-Guided Biopsy [1, 1113]
Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy [4, 6, 7] A dedicated soft­ware upgrade is required for tomosynthesis-guided biopsies. The advantage is its utility in targeting lesions that are appre­ciated in only one view of MG or are tomosynthesis detected asymmetries, architectural distortion, radial scar or calcica­tions. The technique overall remains similar to the stereotac­tic biopsy.
Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM)—Guided Biopsy [810] The new technology of CEM has been gain-
ing popularity due to its ability to demonstrate perfusion characteristics of the lesion. Occasionally, the lesions seen on CEM have no correlation with other imaging modalities,
MRI-detected lesions are usually detected on a second-look US, with proper anatomical localization after obtaining ref­erence to clock position and depth. Occasionally, such lesions cannot be identied on USG.Such masses and non­mass enhancement detected only on MR require MR-guided biopsy.
Technique It is performed after performing the standard
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the patient using dedi­cated breast coils, with the patient lying in the prone posi­tion. It needs special add-on MR-compatible hardware, software and console. The lateral and medial pillars that rmly immobilize the breast during diagnostic MRI are
518
abc
def
E. Dhamija et al.
Fig. 42.3 MR-guided biopsy in a 41-year-old lady with left breast car­cinoma in lower outer quadrant and an additional BI-RADS 3 lesion in upper central region with no USG correlate. This additional lesion appears isointense on T2W imaging (a) and shows early enhancement on post-contrast subtracted sequence (b) (horizontal arrow). Planning sequence for MRI-guided VABB shows the skin marker (vertical arrow)
replaced with fenestrated pillars, consisting of multiple grids. The needle is introduced through a chosen grid win­dow depending on the target location. The three-dimensional axes are calculated either manually or digitally by a soft­ware. After lignocaine instillation, a needle is introduced and sample is taken, preferably with a vacuum system for opti­mal results, followed by clip placement (Fig.42.3).
42.2.5 Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy [1, 4, 14, 15, 16]
Vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) enables one-time insertion of a thick needle into the suspicious site and obtaining the tissue core into a sample chamber using a vacuum apparatus. This needs dedicated equipment and needle assembly which varies from vendor to vendor. The technique of biopsy remains the same with the only difference that instead of
in the axial section (c) and coronal section (d). During intervention, correct position of the obturator is seen with its tip within the lesion (e). Post-biopsy image (f) depicts post-biopsy changes with shortening due to haemorrhagic products (circle). Histopathology conrmed it to be a broadenoma, thus facilitating BCS for her
using a core needle, a VAB needle comprising a large side-on aperture proximal to a sharp tip is used. The needle may be placed just above or below the lesion, or through its centre, and clock positions are customized based on the needle­lesion relation. The site undergoes saline irrigation after obtaining the tissue cores, and some authors prefer to use intra-procedure lignocaine instillation to increase patient comfort.
VAB has been shown to have similar efcacy as excision biopsy with lower rates of repeat biopsy or rad-path discor­dance as compared to core needle biopsy. However, it needs skill and expertise to operate, in addition to being costlier, which limits its utility as a routine practice. Hence, VAB has been reserved mostly for patients with rad-path discordance and for stereotactic biopsies. It has gained wide popularity for removal of broadenomas in young females because it can be performed under local anaesthesia with no disguring scar.