Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
37 Nonvascular Thoracic Interventions
465
tion after being released from the trocar cannula/metal stiff­ener. The nal catheter position is conrmed by imaging. A 50 ml syringe is used to aspirate the abscess cavity until minimal uid returns. Abscess cavity is then ushed with 5–10 ml of sterile saline followed by additional aspiration with 50 ml syringe to ensure full decompression of the abscess cavity. Catheter is then secured in position by sutur­ing to skin.
37.8.3 Seldinger Technique
The collection is punctured with an 18-gauge sheathed nee­dle under image guidance. The position of the tip of needle is conrmed by removing the inner trocar needle. Small amount of sample is retrieved and sent for microbiological analysis. A 0.035-inch guide wire is then advanced into the uid collection and its position is again conrmed by imag­ing. Serial dilatation of the percutaneous tract is done using fascial dilators to the desired catheter size. Finally, a lock­ing pigtail catheter is advanced over the guide wire into the collection. All purulent material should be aspirated to completion and ushed with 5–10mL sterile saline solu­tion to ensure complete emptying of the cavity. The cathe­ter is then secured to the skin and placed for gravity drainage.
37.9.2 Drainage Chest Tube Related
• Pain
• Inappropriate placement
• Symptomatic hypotension
• Iatrogenic haemothorax
• Organ Puncture
• Drain blockage
• Drain displacement
• Surgical emphysema
• Skin infection
• Re-expansion pulmonary oedema
• Pleural space infection
37.9.3 IPC Related
• Pain necessitating IPC removal
• IPC-related infection-supercial (cellulitis) or pleural infection
• IPC-related pleural effusion
• IPC blockage
• IPC dislodgement
37.10 Drainage ofLung Abscess
37.8.4 Post-Procedure Follow-Up
This includes daily monitoring of output and ushing of catheter with 10ml of 0.9% saline solution every 8hours to ensure catheter patency.
37.8.5 Removal
Catheter is removed when daily output decreases to less than 10ml/day for 24–72 hours or when imaging demonstrates resolution of the abscess.

37.9 Complications

37.9.1 Thoracentesis Related
• Pneumothorax
• Bleeding complications
• Re-expansion pulmonary oedema (RPO) failed proce­dure/dry tap
• Symptomatic hypotension
• Organ puncture
CT-guided drainage procedure is the management of choice for patients not responding to medical therapy. Radiological intervention is generally reserved for large abscesses (>6cm) and for patients who are unt for surgery. The normal lung parenchyma traversed should be minimum, and Seldinger technique is preferred especially when substantial lung parenchyma is to be traversed. At least 12F catheter should be inserted.
Relative contraindications: coagulopathy, lack of safe access route and little evidence of liqueed content on imaging.
Complications: empyema, pneumothorax and haemotho­rax.
37.11 Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration
Cytology (FNAC)/Biopsy
37.11.1 Pre-Procedure Evaluation
Prior to performing a transthoracic biopsy, all available imaging of the patient should be reviewed in detail to weigh the risk/benet ratio of performing the biopsy. It also guides us in deciding the best modality and potential access routes to approach the lesion. Bronchoscopic guidance is preferred
466
A. Jayant et al.
for central and endobronchial lesions, USG is preferred for large peripherally located lesions abutting the pleura and CT is used for all lesions that are not accessible by bronchos­copy. The sample should be obtained from viable solid enhancing or PET avid part of the lesion [11].
According to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) consensus guidelines for the periprocedural manage­ment of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions, percutaneous lung biopsy is classied as a high bleeding risk procedure [12]. For such procedures, INR and platelets should be 1.5 and 50,000 per μL, respectively. Clopidogrel should be with­held 5 days prior to the procedure, and aspirin should be withheld 3–5days before the procedure. If the patient is on low molecular weight heparin, one dose should be withheld if a prophylactic dose is used; two doses to be withheld before the procedure if a therapeutic dose is used [12]. All patients planned for transthoracic biopsy should have a short admission and IV access.
37.11.2 Indications andContraindications
The indications and contraindications for transthoracic sam­pling are listed in Table37.1 [13, 14].
37.11.3 Technique
Patient positioning—It can be supine, prone or lateral, depending on the site of the lesion and planned access route. Prone positioning has the advantage of relatively less move­ment during respiration and wider intercostal spaces at the posterior end of the ribs as compared to their anterior ends. The arms should be raised above the head to widen the inter­costal spaces or can be placed in a criss-cross manner on the chest to retract the scapula for better access to the lesion.
Table 37.1 Indications and contraindications of transthoracic sampling
Indications
New or enlarging solitary nodule or mass Multiple nodules in a patient without known neoplastic disease or in prolonged remission Focal parenchymal inltrates in which an infectious organism could not be identied on bronchoalveolar lavage Diagnosis of hilar masses following negative bronchoscopy Undiagnosed mediastinal mass Biopsy or re-biopsy of malignancy for targeted therapy
Contraindications
Absolute Suspected hydatid cyst/
AV M Relative contraindications Severe emphysema or
interstitial lung disease Uncorrectable bleeding
diathesis Lack of safe access path to
the lesion Severe pulmonary artery
hypertension Positive pressure
ventilation
Patients should be instructed to maintain the position and breathe quietly in the same rhythm throughout the procedure.
Access site—The access site should be chosen in such a way that it traverses the least amount of aerated lung and avoids emphysematous lung, bullae, ssure and major bron­chi and vessels [11, 14, 15]. A grid of metallic needles is then placed at the decided access site and a scan is taken in a limited area. The entry site is then marked with the help of a grid and axial plane laser light. The skin in this area is steril­ized with Povidone Iodine (10%) and alcohol-based antisep­tic and anaesthetised using 2% lignocaine. One should be careful not to puncture the pleura during local anaesthetic injection.
Needle type and manipulation—Coaxial system is pre­ferred to avoid multiple pleural punctures. 18G/20G coaxial semiautomatic biopsy guns with dual throw (1 and 2cm) are commonly used as they provide adequate sample size with­out increasing the chances of complications. In an 18 G coaxial biopsy system, the coaxial needle is 17 G and the biopsy needle is 18G.
The coaxial needle is first advanced into the skin and subcutaneous tissue incrementally and proper angula­tion and direction is confirmed before puncturing the pleura. The pleura should be punctured in one swift motion and the needle stabilised within the lesion. After confirming the position of the needle within the lesion, the inner sharp needle is removed while keeping the outer hollow needle within the lesion. The biopsy gun is then advanced through the hollow coaxial needle and multiple core biopsies are taken (Figs. 37.4 and
37.5). FNAC may be done in cases of highly vascular
lesions or very small lesions and rapid on-site evalua­tion should be done during the procedure to increase diagnostic yield (Fig.37.6).
The tissue cores should be placed in a formalin vial for histopathology and normal saline for microbiological anal­ysis. The needle should be taken out during expiration while injecting gelfoam or autologous blood batch to seal the path and reduce the risk of pneumothorax and bleeding [1618].
For large lesions that abut the pleural surface and are visu­alised on USG, a biopsy can be taken under USG guidance (Fig.37.7).
37.11.4 Post-Procedure Care
Patient is then rapidly rolled to the biopsy side down, and coughing and talking should be discouraged during the recovery period. An upright chest radiograph should be obtained after 1–2 hours to look for any signicant pneumothorax.
ab
cd
37 Nonvascular Thoracic Interventions
467
a
Fig. 37.4 CT-guided biopsy of right upper lobe mass in a 73-year-old male patient. (a) Axial contrast-enhanced CT image demonstrates a het­erogeneously enhancing mass in right upper lobe (arrow) and enlarged precarinal lymph node (arrowhead). (b) CT image in prone position
Fig. 37.5 CT-guided biopsy of an anterior mediastinal mass. (a) Axial non-contrast CT image in soft tissue window shows a large anterior mediastinal mass (star). (b and c) Axial non-contrast CT images reveal coaxial needle being advanced (arrows), with the tip within the subcutaneous fat in (b) and within the mass in (c). (d) CT image showing the tip of the biopsy gun needle (arrow) in place within the mass
bc
showing coaxial needle in place within the lung mass (arrow). (c) CT images showing biopsy gun needle tip (arrow) within the mass through the coaxial needle
37.11.5 Complications [11, 14, 15]
mothorax and most of them resolve spontaneously.
However, if the pneumothorax is large or increasing in
• Pneumothorax—It is the most common complication, occurring in around 20% of patients. Most of them are small with only a few requiring chest tube drainages. High-ow supplemental oxygen is helpful in small pneu-
size or if the patient is symptomatic, a chest tube should be placed (Fig.37.8). The incidence of pneumothorax can be reduced by the following measures:
– Explain to the patient about the procedure.
468
ab
A. Jayant et al.
Fig. 37.6 CT-guided FNAC of a lesion in lower lobe of left lung. Axial soft tissue (a) and lung (b) window images (prone) showing a small solid cystic lesion (arrows) in left lower lobe. CT image (c) shows the tip of coaxial needle (arrow) at the margin of the lesion. CT image. (d) shows the tip of FNA needle within the lung lesion (arrow) advanced through the outer coaxial needle
a
b
c
d
Fig. 37.7 USG-guided biopsy of a large intrathoracic mass using semi-automatic biopsy gun. (a) USG image showing coaxial needle in plane positioned within the mass (arrow). (b) USG image showing biopsy gun tip advanced through the coaxial needle into the mass (arrow)
– Instruct to not move, talk, cough or breathe deeply dur-
ing or immediately after procedure.
– Use coaxial technique so that the pleura is punctured
only once.
– Avoid interlobar ssures—to avoid traversing the vis-
ceral pleural multiple times. – Traverse the least amount of aerated lung. – Avoid bullae or pneumatoceles.
– Use salinoma technique—instillation of saline into the
extrapleural space to displace the lung, pleura or vas­cular structures.
– Do not take the stylet out from the coaxial needle at
pleural surface. – Seal the tract with gel foam/autologous blood clot. – P.E.A.R.L approach: P—Positioning with biopsy side
down, E—needle removal during Expiration, A—
cd
37 Nonvascular Thoracic Interventions
469
Fig. 37.8 Pneumothorax during CT-guided biopsy. (a) Axial CT image showing pneumothorax (star) that developed while attempting biopsy of left hilar mass (arrow) in left lateral decubitus position. (bd) Drainage of pneumothorax. CT image (b) showing needle (arrow) being advanced through the left anterior axillary approach. (c and d) showing pigtail drainage catheter in situ (arrows) with reduction in left pneumothorax. Biopsy was performed after draining the pneumothorax
a
b
Autologous blood patch sealing, R—Rapid rollover, L—pleuraL patching.
• Pulmonary haemorrhage (~11%)—It appears as perile­sional ground glass opacity on CT with the patient may develop haemoptysis. Patient should be reassured and put in biopsy side down position to prevent aspiration of blood into the contralateral lung. In most of the cases, it is
sought if patient continues to have haemoptysis or if there is a drop in saturation (Fig.37.9).
• Air embolism (0.01–0.21%)—It results from the needle traversing the pulmonary vein during inspiration. Hollow needle should always be occluded with nger, saline drops or syringe to prevent this.
• Tumour seeding: 0.012–0.061%.
self-limiting. Immediate pulmonology consult should be
470
ab
cd
Fig. 37.9 Pulmonary haemorrhage during percutaneous CT-guided left lower lobe nodule biopsy. (a) Axial lung window CT image shows a small nodule with spiculated margins in left lower lobe (arrow). (b) CT image shows the coaxial needle being advanced (arrow). (c) Axial CT image showing the biopsy gun needle in place within the nodule (arrow). (d) Post­biopsy CT image showing pulmonary haemorrhage, seen ground glass opacities surrounding the nodule (star in c and d)
A. Jayant et al.
37.12 Ablation ofLung Tumours
Pre-Procedure Evaluation
37.12.2 Contraindications [11, 19]
Absolute CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective treatment option for lung cancer patients who are not surgically t [11]. Generally, patients who are t
• Uncorrected coagulopathy
• Bacteraemia or active infection to undergo CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy are good candidates for RFA. The goal of ablation is to prolong
Relative disease-free survival and improve quality of life. Most favourable results are seen in tumours less than 3cm in diameter.
37.12.1 Indications [11, 19]
• Local therapy for medically inoperable patients with
early-stage primary lung cancer
• Multiple lung cancers when denitive local therapy is
possible
• Pulmonary oligometastasis
• Tumour adjacent to vital organs
• Proximity to vessels larger than 3mm—heat sink effect
37.12.3 Technique
The technique is very similar to that of CT-guided lung biopsy. For RFA, the electrode is placed into the tumour using imaging guidance. The electrode is coupled to an RF generator and is grounded by means of a grounding pad applied over the thigh. RFA uses electromagnetic
37 Nonvascular Thoracic Interventions
471
energy in the range of 375–500kHz generated by oscil­lating electric field which leads to tissue heating (~60–100°C) and cell death [11, 19]. Ablation margins should ideally extend beyond the tumour margin by 0.5 to 1cm. For tumours larger than 3cm, overlapping probes can be used.
37.12.4 Post-Procedure Care
• Immediate post-procedure CT should be done to evaluate
the zone of ablation and procedure-related complications like haemorrhage and pneumothorax.
• Repeat chest radiograph should be done after 1–2hours to
look for any signicant pneumothorax.
• Follow-up can be done with CECT every 3months. Post
RFA, there is development of hypodensity, absence of enhancement and development of surrounding ground glass opacity. An enhancing rim of soft tissue surrounding the zone of ablation is considered reactive if uniform and less than 5mm. Imaging features suggestive of recurrent/ residual tumour are [20]:
– Change from ground-glass opacity to solid opacity. – Development of nodules along the electrode tract. – Overall increase in the size of ablation zone by 1.25
times.
– Enhancement more than that in the pre-ablation scan,
central or nodular enhancement >10 mm, enhance­ment >15 HU.
– PET-CT—Persistent uptake centrally or at the region
of ablated tumour, increased activity even after 2months, development of nodular activity at the site of the tumour nodule.
37.12.5 Complications
• Pneumothorax—It is usually self-limiting and doesn’t
require treatment. However, chest tube drainage may be required if it is large or expanding or causing respiratory distress.
• Pulmonary haemorrhage—usually self-limiting.
• Pain—usually self-limiting.
• Fever.
• Infection.
37.12.6 Tips andTricks
• The ideal position of RFA probe is along the long axis of
the tumour.
• Normal lung acts as insulation and concentrates RF
energy.
• Lesions close to the visceral pleura are more painful to ablate than deeper lesions.
• PET is more accurate than contrast CT for follow-up.

References

1. Dammert P, Pratter M, Boujaoude Z. Safety of ultrasound-guided small-bore chest tube insertion in 999 patients on clopidogrel. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2013;20(1):16–20.
2. Perl S, Bondarenco M, Natif N, Shpirer Y, Enghelberg S, Fox B. Thoracentesis under clopidogrel is not 1001 associ­ated with excessive bleeding events: a cohort study. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):281.
3. Mahmood K, Shofer SL, Moser BK, Argento AC, Smathers EC, Wahidi MM.Hemorrhagic complications 1003 of thoracentesis and small-bore chest tube placement in patients taking clopidogrel. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(1):73–9.
4. Zalt MB, Bechara RI, Parks C, Berkowitz DM. Effect of rou­tine clopidogrel use on bleeding complications 1006 after ultrasound- guided thoracentesis. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2012;19(4):284–7.
5. Abouzgheib W, Shweihat YR, Meena N, Bartter T. Is chest tube insertion with ultrasound guidance safe 1008in patients using clop­idogrel? Respirology. 2012;17(8):1222–4.
6. Puchalski JT, Argento AC, Murphy TE, Araujo KL, Pisani MA.The safety of thoracentesis in patients with 1010 uncorrected bleeding risk. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10(4):336–41.
7. Bhalla A, Jana M, Naranje P, Singh S, Banday I. Challenges in image-guided drainage of infected pleural collections: a review. J Clin Interv Radiol ISVIR. 2022;6:131–40. https://doi.
org/10.1055/s- 0041- 1734374.
8. Corso RM, Agnoletti V, Piraccini E, Lupi C, Gambale G. Wire­guided chest tube placement in the intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(6):1071–2.
9. Gobien R, Stanley J, Gobien B, Vujic I, Pass H.Percutaneous cath­eter aspiration and drainage of suspected mediastinal abscesses. Radiology. 1984;51:69–71.
10. Arellano RS, Gervais DA, Mueller PR. Computed tomography­guided drainage of mediastinal abscesses: clinical experience with 23 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(5):673–7. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.427.
11. Bhalla A, Jana M, Naranje P, Mohan A, Guleria R.Clinico radio­logical series: imaging of chest tumors. Delhi: Jaypee; 2019.
12. Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC, Hanks SE, Tam AL, Walker TG, etal. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleed­ing risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions—part II: recommendations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(8):1168.
13. Anzidei M, Porri A, Andrani F, Di Martino M, Saba L, Catalano C, et al. Imaging-guided chest biopsies: techniques and clinical results. Insights Imaging. 2017;8(4):419–28.
14. Wible B.Diagnostic imaging: interventional procedures. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2017.
15. Winokur R, Sullivan B, Madoff D, Pua B. Percutaneous lung biopsy: technique, efcacy, and complications. Semin Interv Radiol. 2013;30(02):121–7.
16. Sum R, Lau T, Paul E, Lau K.Gelfoam slurry tract occlusion after computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: does it prevent major pneumothorax? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;65(6):678–85.
17. Tran AA, Brown SB, Rosenberg J, Hovsepian DM.Tract embo­lization with gelatin sponge slurry for prevention of pneumotho-
472
A. Jayant et al.
rax after percutaneous computed tomography-guided lung biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;37(6):1546–53.
18. Naja A, Al Ahmar M, Bonnet B, Delpla A, Kobe A, Madani K, etal. The Pearl Approach for CT-guided lung biopsy: assessment of complication rate. Radiology. 2022;302(2):473–80.
19. Lin M, Eiken P, Blackmon S.Image guided thermal ablation in lung cancer treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(11):7039–47.
20. Abtin FG, Eradat J, Gutierrez AJ, Lee C, Fishbein MC, Suh RD.Radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors: imaging features of the Postablation Zone. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):947–69.
Interventions oftheBiliary Tract
PalakGarg, VishnuPrasadPulappadi, andS.H.Chandrashekhara
38
Key Messages
1. Pre-intervention imaging (CT/MRCP) is essential to evaluatethe aetiology and localizethe site of obstruction for proper planning of the procedure.
2. Adequate pre-and post-procedural antibiotics cover (Piperacillin+ Tazobactam) is essential to avoid biliary sepsis.
3. PTBD involves no signicant manipulation of papilla, hence lower chances of iatrogenic pancreatitis, and is efcient for proximal tract obstruction.
4. The PTBD target duct should drain at least one-sixth of the hepatic parenchyma with maintained integrity of the target lobe parenchyma and its portal vein branch.
5. Check cholangiogram should always be done using ~5–10 ml of low osmolar water-soluble contrast (Iohexol) to avoid biliary reux and sepsis.
6. Plastic stents used for biliary stenting are retrievable, require large bore access and therefore are inserted via an endoscopic route.
7. In cases of benign or operable malignant strictures, plas­tic stents are preferred due to their retrievable property.
8. Percutaneous biliary stenting is done using self­expandable metallic stents and the stent is deployed to cover approximately 2–3cm proximaland 1 cmdistal to the site of obstruction.
9. The transhepatic cholecystostomy approach is per­formed using the Seldinger technique and is preferred due to the lower risk of biliary peritonitis.

38.1 Introduction

A patentbiliary ductsystemis necessary to ensure adequate biliary drainage. Any mechanical obstruction of the biliary tract leads to cholestasis, which in clinical terms is known as obstructive jaundice [1]. The obstruction can be secondary to either benign or malignant causes.
Clinically, it presents with yellowish discoloration of eyes, abdominal pain, darkening of urine and pale stools [2]. On laboratory evaluation, there are increased serum bilirubin (Direct > Indirect), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma­glutamyl- transferase (GGT) levels [3].
For adequate relief of biliary obstruction, radiologists play an essential role in image-guided percutaneous transhe­patic biliary drainage (PTBD), biliary stenting and cholecys­tostomy. PTBD is a relatively less invasive procedure for the relief of biliary obstruction [4]. Although the denite treat­ment for benign obstruction is biliary tract dilatation or stent placement, PTBD is performed to overcome the acute rise in bilirubin levels. In advanced cases of malignant biliary obstruction, that are usually secondary to gall bladder carci­noma and cholangiocarcinoma in Northern India, PTBD and stenting are palliative treatmentoptions that can help improve the quality of life and decrease the bilirubin levelto facilitate chemotherapy.

38.2 Biliary Anatomy

Biliary ducts are extensively evaluated by non-contrast as well as contrast-enhanced MR cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) (non-invasive) and percutaneous cholangiography
P. Garg Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
V. P. Pulappadi Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, India
S. H. Chandrashekhara ( Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 S. H. Chandrashekhara (ed.), Textbook of Interventional Radiology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9601-4_38
*)
(invasive). The liver is divided by Couinaud into eight seg­ments, each segment being supplied by its own portal venous supply and drained by the hepatic venous system [5]. The biliary ducts run along with the portal venous system [6]. The right posterior duct has a relatively horizontal course and drains segments VI and VII, whereas the right anterior duct drains segments V and VIII.They join to form the right
473
474
P. Garg et al.
hepatic duct. Multiple small tributaries drain the segments of the left lobe of liver and join to form left hepatic duct. The right and left hepatic duct join at primary conuence to form the common hepatic duct [7].
The biliary tract can have multiple variations and these variations make it prone to bile duct injury and leak during surgery. A common variation involving the insertion of right posterior segmental duct into left hepatic duct makes it sus­ceptible to injury during hepatic transplantation [7].
The common hepatic duct is joined by the cystic duct to form the common bile duct (CBD). CBD further continues its course and drains through the major papilla along with the pancreatic duct into the second part of the duodenum. Along its course, CBD is divided into porta hepatis seg­ment, extra- hepatic suprapancreatic segment and intra-pan­creatic segment.

38.3 Biliary Obstruction

The various benign and malignant causes of biliary obstruc­tion are listed in Table38.1 [4].
In malignant cases, image-guided procedures such as PTBD are palliative and help relieve the obstructive symp­toms. The various malignant causes for biliary obstruction at different levels of biliary tract are listed in Table38.2 [810].
Malignant obstruction causes obliteration of the lumen of bile duct along with upstream biliary tract dilation. On imag­ing, malignant strictures of the biliary tract appear as irregu­lar narrowing or rat tail stenosis. In pancreatic head malignancy, the classic double duct sign is seendue to dilata­tion of the biliary as well as pancreatic duct [11]. Hence, before undergoing any invasive procedure such as ERCP or PTBD, the patient should undergo a screening cross- sectional
Table 38.1 Various causes of biliary obstruction
Benign obstruction
Malignant obstructionCongenital Acquired
Choledochal cyst Choledocholithiasis
(most common)
Biliary atresia Iatrogenic strictures
(post­cholecystectomy)
Strictures secondary to trauma
Post-inammatory strictures
Carcinoma of gall bladder
Cholangiocarcinoma
Pancreatic head adenocarcinoma
Ampullary carcinoma
Duodenal carcinoma Extrinsic compression
secondary to periportal lymph nodes, stomach and colon carcinoma
Table 38.2 Malignant causes of biliary obstruction
Level of obstruction Malignant causes At porta hepatis GB carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma,
Extrahepatic suprapancreatic segment
Intra-pancreatic segment Pancreatic head adenocarcinoma,
hepatic metastasis, periportal lymphadenopathy
Periportal lymphadenopathy, locally advanced carcinoma stomach, colon and pancreatic head adenocarcinoma
ampullary carcinoma and duodenal carcinoma
imaging which can be a contrast-enhanced CT or MRCP.It helps to delineate the degree of dilation of biliary tract, site of obstruction and patency of primary and secondary conu­ences for planning the procedure.

38.4 Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage

PTBD refers to percutaneous drainage of bile for relieving biliary obstruction. It is a relatively safe procedure as it does not involve manipulation of the papilla, thereby reducing the risk of iatrogenic acute pancreatitis. However, PTBD done in non-dilated biliary ducts or in the left lobe requires ultra­sound guidance. To improve the success rate of any image­guided procedure, the performing radiologist should ensure proper catheter selection, patient care and follow-up after procedure.
38.4.1 Pre-Procedure Evaluation andPreparation
The primary investigation in a patient presenting with obstructive jaundice is USG that helps in assessing the extent of biliary dilatation, patency of primary conuence as well as delineate the cause and site of obstruction. The patient should also have a cross-sectional imaging—CECT or MRCP for planning the drainage.
As PTBD is technically challenging and the biliary tract is in close proximity to the hepatic artery and portal vein branches in the portal triad, there is approximately a 2.5% risk of bleeding during the procedure [12]. As per the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) consensus guidelines, INR <1.5 and platelet count >50,000/mm3 are advisable to minimize the risk of bleeding [13]. Anti-platelet drugs such as aspirin and clopidogrel should be withheld 5days prior to the procedure, if possible [14]. Also, serum bilirubin levels are checked to assess the severity of jaundice.