Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
368
A. Gupta et al.
29.3.1.2 Technique
Diagnostic angiography is performed as the rst step before endovascular embolization. It is required to assess ow char­acteristics and to identify arterial feeders, draining veins and nidus. Distinct AVM nidal architectures have been described on angiography [12, 13] (Table29.3)—Type I AVMs have three or less arterial feeders with single draining vein. Type II AVMs have multiple arterial feeders with a single draining vein. According to the morphology of the draining vein, type II is subclassied into types IIa, IIb and IIc. Type III AVMs have multiple arterial inows and draining veins which are either non-dilated (type IIIa) or dilated (type IIIb). Type III AVMs are the most common variety; however, type I and
Table 29.3 Yakes angiographic classication of AVMs and treatment strategy
Angiographic type of AVM Description Endovascular treatment strategy
Type I Three or less feeding arteries and a single draining vein Trans-arterial embolization of stula with coils or plugs Type II Multiple arterioles shunt into a single draining vein Coil packing of venous segment followed by ethanol injection
Type IIa Multiple arterioles shunt to a focal segment of draining
vein
Type IIb Multiple arterioles shunt into a venous sac with
multiple draining veins
Type IIc Multiple arterioles shunt along a long segment of
draining vein
Type III Multiple arterial inows and draining veins Trans-arterial super-selective catheterization of feeding arteries
Type IIIa Multiple arterioles shunt to multiple draining veins via
multiple ne stulae
Type IIIb Multiple arterioles shunt to multiple draining veins via
multiple enlarged stulae
type II AVMs respond better to embolization. The emboliza­tion technique depends on the type of AVM architecture and anatomical location [14].
Flow reduction is of paramount importance to ensure suf­cient contact time of the sclerosant with the nidus. Manual/ tourniquet compression or blood pressure cuff ination should be used to compress draining vein wherever possible. Temporary balloon occlusion or coil embolization of the inow or outow can also be used.
In type I AVMs, the goal is blockage of the direct stula between artery and vein using coils, vascular plugs or EVOH via trans-arterial route (Fig.29.7). For type II AVMs, blood ow in AVM is rst limited either by manual compression or
Trans-venous or direct puncture approach
Direct puncture of the venous sac is preferable
Trans-venous or direct puncture approach
followed by ethanol/NBCA glue/EVOH injection
Dilute ethanol (50–60%) or NBCA glue/EVOH is preferred
NBCA glue/EVOH embolization may be used rst for ow reduction; direct puncturing of dilated stulae may also be done
Fig. 29.7 Type I AVM. (a) Angiogram shows AVM (black arrow) with a single feeding artery from supercial temporal artery (dotted white arrow) and a single draining vein (white arrow). There is direct arteriovenous stula (asterisk). (b) The AVM shows the absence of contrast opacication (arrow) following trans-arterial embolization with onyx. c—catheter
ab
*
c
c
ab
29 IR Management ofVascular Malformations
Fig. 29.8 Type II AVM. (a) Angiogram shows AVM (black arrow) in the forearm with multiple feeding arterioles (white arrows) and a single dominant outow vein (dotted arrows). c— catheter. (b) Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) image showing multiple coils (black arrows) deployed in the venous sac of AVM by direct puncture (dotted arrows)
369
c
coils in the venous segment commonly by transvenous or direct puncture approach followed by high-concentration ethanol (80–100%) injection transarterially (Fig.29.8). For type III AVMs, a trans-arterial approach is preferred. For type IIIa lesions, diluted ethanol (50–60%) is used especially for supercial lesions to prevent skin necrosis. For type IIIb AVMs, direct puncture of the dilated stulae may also be done, but care has to be taken to avoid any extravascular extension of glue (Fig.29.9). A combination approach can also be taken.
Ethanol is the most widely used liquid sclerosing agent for AVM treatment because of its high efcacy owing to endothelial damage, protein denaturation and rapid thrombo­sis [15]. It is highly cost-effective as well but carries signi­cant risk of complications including signicant local-site pain and oedema after injection. Thus, general anaesthesia is usually required during the procedure. Skin necrosis is another potential complication, and thus, ethanol should be avoided in AVMs with signicant cutaneous involvement. Pulmonary hypertension is a dreaded complication which occurs if high dose of ethanol is used. The maximum volume of ethanol that can be used is 1 mL/kg body weight, and while planning for high volume of ethanol injection (>0.5mL/kg body weight), a pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz line and arterial line monitoring is recommended. Use of nitroglycerin infusion is recommended if mean pulmonary
artery pressure rises above 25mm Hg. Without pulmonary artery monitoring, max volumes of 15–20ml alcohol can be used (not more than 5ml in a single arterial branch).
Other embolizing agents have also been used for the treatment of AVMs. NBCA glue (mixed with ethiodized oil) is preferred in AVMs with large draining veins or in the setting of coagulopathy, as it quickly polymerizes into a cast when exposed to anions. Ethylene vinyl alcohol copo­lymer (EVOH) is another cast-forming agent that has been used especially in central nervous system AVMs. EVOH injection can be better controlled by the operator because of its longer casting time as compared to glue. However, the clinical results with cast-forming agents are not long-last­ing. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles carry a high risk of non- target embolization in cases of AVMs and are thus avoided.
Overall cure rate of peripheral AVMs with endovascular therapy has been reported to be 40% and clinical success rate (cure or marked symptomatic improvement) of 60% [14]. In larger lesions, some practitioners advocate treating individ­ual compartments serially, eventually resulting in complete treatment over time. Post-procedure follow-up of the patient can be done after 4weeks, before planning a re-embolization if the desired symptomatic relief is not achieved. Time inter­val between sessions is generally 3–6months, depending on the patient’s symptoms and extent of lesion.
370
ab
A. Gupta et al.
Fig. 29.9 Type III AVM. (a) Angiogram shows AVM in the arm with multiple feeding arterioles and multiple draining veins (arrows). (b) The AVM shows the absence of contrast opacication (arrow) following trans­arterial embolization with glue. c—catheter
c
c
29.3.1.3 Complications
The most common minor complications (20% cases) reported with ethanol embolotherapy are focal skin necrosis, bullae formation and transient nerve injuries. Major compli­cations, occurring in around 3% cases, include signicant skin necrosis requiring grafts, tissue necrosis requiring amputation, permanent nerve injury, pulmonary hyperten­sion, acute pancreatitis and acute renal failure [14]. Non­target embolization and occlusion of the parent arteries are other potential complications.
cent subcutaneous phlebectasia. Their diagnosis is often delayed due to overlapping clinical and imaging features with the more common venous malformation. On MRI, three morphological types have been described: focal mass-like (limited to one anatomical region with >75% perceptible margins), focal inltrative (ill-dened margins) and diffuse inltrative (involving more than one compartment with imperceptible margins) [1].
In the limited available literature regarding the manage­ment of FAVA, cryoablation has been described as an effective modality [16]. It is more benecial in cases with focal lesions and before contracture sets in. In our experience, radiofre-

29.4 Fibro-Adipose Vascular Anomaly (FAVA)

quency ablation has also reaped good results for palliation of pain. For diffuse inltrative lesions with contractures not responding to conservative measures, surgical excision of the
FAVA is a recently described distinct vascular anomaly categorized under ‘provisionally unclassied vascular anom­alies’ in ISSVA 2018 classication. It classically occurs in young or adolescent patients and presents with swelling, pain, functional impairment and contracture involving the calf and forearm muscles. Imaging usually demonstrates a solid-looking enhancing mass with interspersed dilated venous channels, brofatty inltration and associated adja-
lesion is a viable option along with nerve decompression, ten­don lengthening or osteotomy as required for deformity cor­rection. Systemic treatment with sirolimus, a mediator of phosphoinositol 3-kinase signalling pathway, has also been described in the management of diffuse FAVA.No signicant role for sclerotherapy has been shown for the management of FAVA, and lack of response to sclerotherapy in a suspected venous malformation may suggest a diagnosis of FAVA [16].
29 IR Management ofVascular Malformations
371

29.5 Conclusion

Vascular malformations are complex diseases requiring mul­tidisciplinary management. They are classied based on their ow characteristics depending on the presence of an arterial component. Interventional radiology plays a major role in the management of such patients since many of them are not amenable to a denitive surgery. For low-ow vascular mal­formations (venous and lymphatic malformations), percuta­neous imaging-guided sclerosant injection into cystic spaces is the preferred management. For high-ow arteriovenous malformations, endovascular therapy including embolization for ow occlusion and glue/ethanol injection is the preferred treatment, approach based on the type of AVM architecture on angiography. Recently described solid- appearing lesions like bro-adipose vascular anomaly can be treated with abla­tion for pain relief. The role of radiologist is pivotal in both the diagnosis and management of vascular anomalies.

References

1. Das A, Goyal A, Sangwan A, Kumar A, Bhalla AS, Kandasamy D, et al. Vascular anomalies: diagnostic fea­tures and step-wise approach. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 1987. 2022;18:2841851221085379.
2. Burrows PE.Endovascular treatment of slow-ow vascular malfor­mations. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;16(1):12–21.
3. Mazoyer E, Enjolras O, Laurian C, Houdart E, Drouet L. Coagulation abnormalities associated with extensive venous malformations of the limbs: differentiation from Kasabach-Merritt syndrome. Clin Lab Haematol. 2002;24(4):243–51.
4. Burrows PE, Mason KP.Percutaneous treatment of low ow vascu­lar malformations. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 2004;15(5):431–45.
5. de Lorimier AA.Sclerotherapy for venous malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(2):188–93. discussion 194
6. Bagga B, Goyal A, Das A, Bhalla AS, Kandasamy D, Singhal M, etal. Clinicoradiologic predictors of sclerotherapy response in low­ow vascular malformations. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(1):209–219.e2.
7. McCafferty I. Management of low-ow vascular malformations: clinical presentation, classication, patient selection, imaging and treatment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(5):1082–104.
8. Suh JS, Shin KH, Na JB, Won JY, Hahn SB.Venous malformations: sclerotherapy with a mixture of ethanol and lipiodol. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997;20(4):268–73.
9. Cabrera J, Cabrera J, Garcia-Olmedo MA. Sclerosants in micro­foam. A new approach in angiology. Int Angiol J Int Union Angiol. 2001;20(4):322–9.
10. Yang Y, Sun M, Ma Q, Cheng X, Ao J, Tian L, etal. Bleomycin A5 sclerotherapy for cervicofacial lymphatic malformations. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1):150–5.
11. Das A, Goyal A, Sangwan A, Bhalla AS, Kumar A, Kandasamy D, et al. Vascular anomalies: nomenclature, classication, and imaging algorithms. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 1987. 2022;12:2841851221082241.
12. Cho SK, Do YS, Shin SW, Kim DI, Kim YW, Park KB, et al. Arteriovenous malformations of the body and extremities: analy­sis of therapeutic outcomes and approaches according to a modi­ed angiographic classication. J Endovasc Ther Off J Int Soc Endovasc Spec. 2006;13(4):527–38.
13. Ko SE, Do YS, Park KB, Kim DI, Heo SH, Bae SH, et al. Subclassication and treatment results of ethanol embolotherapy of type II arteriovenous malformations of the extremity and body. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 2019;30(9):1443–51.
14. Kim R, Do YS, Park KB. How to treat peripheral arteriovenous malformations. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22(4):568–76.
15. Yakes WF, Rossi P, Odink H.How I do it. Arteriovenous malforma­tion management. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;19(2):65–71.
16. Lipede C, Nikkhah D, Ashton R, Murphy G, Barnacle AM, Patel PA, et al. Management of Fibro-adipose Vascular Anomalies (FAVA) in paediatric practice. JPRAS Open. 2021;29:71–81.
Vascular Interventions inTrauma
RichaYadav, ShivanandGamanagatti, andAtinKumar
30
Key Messages
1. Hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade liver and splenic injuries are candidates for nonoperative management.
2. Splenic artery and hepatic artery embolization can be per­formed with curative intent, i.e., to treat active bleeding, or as a preventive measure in high-grade injury with no active bleeding to reduce the risk of secondary bleeding.
3. Proximal splenic artery embolization is done in case of extensive injury to the spleen, while distal embolization is done in case of focal vascular injury.
4. Vascular injuries of the extremities are managed by embolization if the injured artery can be sacriced and by stent graft placement if the injury is in a major artery that cannot be sacriced.
5. Pelvic vascular injury is associated with high risk of mor­tality and endovascular embolization is the primary modality for treatment.
6. Nonselective embolization of bilateral internal iliac arter­ies can be done using gelfoam in hemodynamically unstable patients to achieve rapid hemostasis.
7. Heparin and heparin saline may be withheld during the procedure in the acute setting of trauma.

30.1 Introduction

Interventional radiology has emerged as an integral adjunct to nonoperative management of traumatic solid organ and vascu­lar injuries, which can mitigate life-threatening hemorrhage and the need for surgical interventions1. The primary aim is to secure the hemostasis on time either by operative or nonopera­tive management, depending on the hemodynamic status of the patient; hence patient selection and timing of the proce-
R. Yadav (*) · S. Gamanagatti · A. Kumar Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, JPNA Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
dure are crucial factors in determining the success of the inter­ventional procedure. The imaging protocols and management decisions strictly adhere to American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) guidelines for acute trauma.
Computed tomography (CT), coupled with an enhanced understanding of patient selection criteria for embolization procedures, holds tremendous promise for further rening the pivotal role of interventional radiologists in trauma care. In this chapter, we tried to emphasize the clinical indication, techniques, and complications of vascular intervention in traumatic solid organ injuries like splenic, liver, and arterial injury of the extremity and head and neck region.

30.2 Splenic Injuries

Though the spleen is the most common organ to be injured after blunt trauma, the management strategy depends upon the hemodynamic status and imaging ndings. In the last few decades, the management paradigm has considerably shifted from operative (OM) to nonoperative management (NOM). NOM is dened as close observation, monitoring, or angio­embolization to preserve the immune functions of the spleen to prevent overwhelming infection from encapsulating organisms [1]. A successful treatment relies on the ability to quickly assess the hemodynamic stability and categorize the injury severity. Angioembolization is an important addition to NOM and is a safe, effective, and rational way to improve the success rate of NOM and can be used as curative as well as preventive purposes. It is said curative when done to treat active bleeding and preventive when done in high-grade injury with no active bleeding where the aim is to reduce the secondary bleeding and to secure the hemostasis.
According to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines for trauma, a hemodynamically unstable patient is a surgical candidate while hemodynamic stable patients and transient responders are ideal candidates for splenic artery embolization (SAE) [2].
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 S. H. Chandrashekhara (ed.), Textbook of Interventional Radiology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9601-4_30
373
374
R. Yadav et al.
30.2.1 Indications ofSAE
According to ATLS guidelines, the evaluation starts with a computed tomography (CT) scan in a stable patient, which helps to shortlist the candidates for embolization, reveals additional injuries, and serves as baseline mapping [3]. The ideal candidates for angioembolization are:
1. Moderate to severe splenic injury (AAST grade IV-V) with hemoperitoneum.
2. Vascular injury (active contrast extravasation, pseudoan­eurysm, AV stula formation).
30.2.2 Technique
Includes patient preparation, procedure, approaches, the embolic agent used, and post-procedural care. The planning is based on ndings on CECT ndings.
30.2.3 Patient Preparation
Includes ongoing resuscitation, securing the airway, breath­ing, and circulation. Ensuring adequate IV access with a
large bore IV line. The basic laboratory parameters are not prerequisites for trauma patients where the main aim is to achieve a rapid hemostasis [4].
30.2.4 Procedure
The arterial access is obtained by puncturing the common femoral artery under uoroscopic or USG guidance with the placement of an appropriate-sized vascular sheath. USG guidance when available is preferable, especially in cases with poor or nonpalpable common femoral pulse. Heparin and heparin saline may be withheld in the setting of trauma. A selective celiac artery angiogram is performed using appro­priately shaped diagnostic catheters like RC (Rosch) or SIM (Simmons) reverse curve. Superselective catheterization of the splenic artery is usually done with a coaxial microcathe­ter. Depending upon the angiographic injury pattern, proxi­mal, distal, or combined embolization is done using various embolizing agents [4]. Proximal embolization is done in the main splenic artery segment between dorsal pancreatic artery and pancreatic artery magna with preservation of collateral vascularity, with the aim of reduction in perfusion pressure in cases with diffuse high-grade injury (Fig.30.1) [5]. Distal embolization is performed close to the site of focal vascular
Fig. 30.1 Splenic artery embolization (proximal technique) in a young patient following blunt trauma Axial (a) and coronal reformatted (b) contrast- enhanced CT images display a grade IV splenic injury (AAST grade) and intraparenchy­mal extravasation. The selective celiac angiogram (c) reveals multifocal areas of active extravasation with abnormal parenchymal blush. Post­embolization images (d) demonstrate coil occlusion of the main splenic artery between the dorsal pancreatic and pancreatic magna branch with no further contrast extravasation
a
c
b
d
cd
30 Vascular Interventions inTrauma
375
abnormalities like pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous stula, and focal extravasation (Fig.30.2). A combination of both proximal and distal embolization can be done, however is not preferable due to higher complication rates [6]. In the context of splenic artery embolization (SAE) for splenic injury, the
Fig. 30.2 Splenic artery embolization (distal technique) in a young patient following a road trafc accident Axial (a) and coronal reformatted (b) contrast- enhanced CT images demonstrate a grade IV splenic injury and an intraparenchymal pseudoaneurysm at the upper pole (arrow). The selective celiac angiogram (c) reveals a focal well- dened contrast blob at the upper pole, suggesting a pseudoaneurysm. The splenic artery angiogram after emboliza­tion (d) shows complete coil occlusion of the upper pole segmental splenic artery, as close as possible to the site of arterial injury, with no residual pseudoa­neurysm and preserved perfusion in the mid-lower pole
a
decision to perform proximal or distal coil embolization or combined depends on the specic characteristics of the injury, the location of the bleeding, and the anatomy of the splenic artery. Both proximal and distal coil embolization techniques have their advantages and considerations (Table30.1).
b
Table 30.1 The merits and demerits of proximal versus distal splenic artery angioembolization (SAE)
Proximal SAE (P) Distal SPE (D)
Aim of procedure Decreases the overall perfusion pressure in the spleen with
Site of embolization
Advantages Preferred for high-grade trauma without any focal arterial
Disadvantages Higher risk of complications related to the potential
maintained viability of the spleen via the collateral pathway Coils are placed closer to the origin of the splenic artery, near
the celiac axis (b/w dorsal pancreatic and pancreatic magna artery), or the main splenic artery at the hilum
abnormality. More secure and complete occlusion of the main blood supply to the spleen can be advantageous for controlling signicant or diffuse bleeding from the spleen. Effective for managing high-grade splenic injuries and cases where there is a need for extensive hemostasis on time. Less time-consuming especially in cases where the time main bounding factor to secure hemostasis.
compromise of collateral circulation, such as ischemia to the stomach, pancreas, or liver. Careful consideration of the patient’s overall vascular anatomy is essential to minimize the risk of unintended ischemic complications.
Segmental arterial embolization of the source focal bleed within splenic parenchyma
Coils are placed further downstream in the smaller segmental branches of the splenic artery, closer to the site of the bleeding within the spleen
It is more selective and spares some of the healthy splenic tissue, potentially reducing the risk of post­embolization syndrome and preserving some immune function of the spleen. Particularly suitable for focal or localized bleeding within the spleen, allowing targeted occlusion of the bleeding vessels.
Potential risk of incomplete embolization, leading to the need for additional interventions or ongoing bleeding. In signicant or diffuse bleeding cases, distal embolization may not provide as robust hemostasis as proximal embolization.
376
R. Yadav et al.
30.2.5 Embolizing Agent
The most commonly used embolization agents are coils, vas­cular plugs, and gelatin foam, glue. Coils are preferred and most commonly used [7].
Sizing of the coil: Coil diameter should be approximately
20% size more than the diameter of the embolizing vessel.
30.2.6 Post-procedural Care
The immediate post-procedural care includes close observa­tion of vitals and access site care at least for 24hours to pre­vent complications. A routine post-procedural ultrasonography (USG) is recommended on the next day to look for residual pseudoaneurysm and to assess the puncture site complication.
30.2.7 Complication
SAE is a part of NOM and post-procedural complications are rare compared to OM.The main predictors for the success of NOM include grading of injury and associated preexisting splenic disease. The higher the grade, the more failure rates will be. The minor complications include post-embolization syndrome and contrast-induced nephrotoxicity which is managed conservatively [8]. The major complications that may require surgery are splenic infection or abscess forma­tion. Others are large splenic and pancreatic infractions [9]. Late complications are pseudoaneurysms or delayed splenic rupture [9].
candidate, and a stable patient undergoes single phase or multiphasic CECT torso depending upon FAST status [11]. Single-phase CECT is done in FAST-negative while multiphasic in FAST-positive patients. Indications for hepatic artery embolization (HAE) in liver injury include:
1. High-grade liver injury (AAST IV-V) with an active source of bleeding in a hemodynamically stable patient.
2. High-grade injury (AAST grade IV/V) with massive hemoperitoneum, without any focal source of bleeding.
3. As an adjunct treatment for patients with damage control laparotomy, persistent tachycardia, or drop in hemoglo­bin or transient responders.
30.3.3 Technique
Includes patient preparation, procedure, approaches, the embolic agent used, and post-procedural care. The planning is based on ndings on CECT ndings, which provide not only the characteristics of injury but also a roadmap to local­ize the bleeder site and associate common anatomical varia­tions of the origin of the hepatic artery to avoid undue time wasted in hooking or localizing the origin of vessels.
30.3.4 Patient Preparation
Includes ongoing resuscitation, securing the airway, breath­ing, and circulation. Ensuring adequate IV access with a large bore IV line. The basic laboratory parameters are not prerequisites for trauma patients where the main aim is to achieve a rapid hemostasis [12].

30.3 Hepatic Injury

30.3.1 Background
Interventional radiology (IR) angiographic embolization is a minimally invasive procedure used in the management of liver injury and can be indicated in certain clinical scenarios. The procedure involves using imaging guidance to locate and treat bleeding vessels within the liver [10].
30.3.2 Indication
As per institutional guidelines, the evaluation started with the status of FAST and the hemodynamic status of the patient. A hemodynamically unstable patient is a surgical
30.3.5 Procedure (Figs.30.3 and30.4)
After obtaining the arterial access and withholding heparin, a selective celiac artery angiogram is performed using appro­priately shaped diagnostic catheters like RC (Rosch) or SIM (Simmons) reverse curve. Superselective catheterization of the hepatic artery is usually done with a coaxial microcathe­ter. Depending upon the imaging and angiographic injury pattern of injury, embolization or vascular reconstruction is done. In case of focal active bleeding or pseudoaneurysm or large AV stula, with an appropriate landing zone in the sac­ricable artery, embolization is done using permanent embo­lizing agents like coils or coils with glue or plug, aimed to complete blockage of the forward ow of the targeted artery. In case of focal active bleeding or pseudoaneurysm or AV
cd
30 Vascular Interventions inTrauma
377
Fig. 30.3 Hepatic artery gelfoam embolization in a young patient with high-grade injury (AAST grade IV/V) presenting with massive hemoperitoneum, without any focal source of bleeding Axial (a) contrast-enhanced CT images depict a large intraparen­chymal hematoma with lacerations, involving the entire right lobe of the liver. The selective celiac angiogram (b) reveals a large area of abnormal blush in the right lobe of the liver with no active contrast extravasa­tion or pseudoaneurysm formation. The hepatic artery angiogram after gelfoam embolization (d) demonstrates complete occlusion of the forward ow of the right hepatic artery, with no abnormal parenchymal blush
a
b
a
Fig. 30.4 Hepatic artery embolization in a patient with high-grade injury (AAST grade IV) with a pseudoaneurysm following a road traf­c accident Axial (a) contrast-enhanced CT images show a grade IV liver injury with an intraparenchymal pseudoaneurysm in the right lobe of the liver (arrow). Selective celiac angiogram (b) reveals a large, focal, well-
b
dened contrast blob arising from the anterior division of the right hepatic artery. The hepatic artery angiogram after embolization (c) demonstrates complete coil occlusion of the anterior division of the right hepatic artery, as close as possible to the site of arterial injury, with no residual pseudoaneurysm
c
378
R. Yadav et al.
stula, with an appropriate landing zone in the main artery or non-sacricable artery, vascular reconstruction is done using a stent graft, aimed to salvage the main feeding artery. In case of high-grade injury without a denitive active bleed or pseudoaneurysm, a temporary embolizing agent like gel­foam injection is done in the segmental/lobar artery of the injured part of the liver, aimed to temporarily block the for­ward ow in a targeted artery to achieve hemostasis.
30.3.6 Embolization Agent
The choice of embolic material is tailored to the specic needs of each individual case, the imaging characteristics of the injury (size and location of bleeding vessels), and the preferences of the interventional radiologist [13]. Commonly used embolizing materials are coils (preferably micro coils), gelfoam, and occasionally glue [14]. Coils are the most commonly used embolizing agent in liver injury when aimed to complete permanent blocking of the targeted bleeder artery, and gelfoam is the next commonly used temporary biodegradable embolizing agent when aimed to achieve immediate temporary hemostasis in grade IV/V liver injuries with no active source of bleeder is identied. Other rarely used embolizing agents are glue, particles, and Onyx [15].
30.3.7 Post-procedural Care
The immediate post-procedural care is the same as splenic artery angioembolization.
either hemorrhagic or ischemic and are listed in Table30.2. The hemorrhagic types of arterial injury on imaging include pseudoaneurysm, AV stula, and active contrast extravasa­tion either from large arteries or small- to medium-sized arteries. The imaging patterns of ischemic injury include thrombus, transection, and dissecting ap with intramural hematoma. Imaging plays an integral role in characterizing both types. Endovascular management plays an important role in the hemorrhagic form of PVI and very limited or no role in the ischemic form [21].
Management of hemorrhagic form of PVI depends on the amount and speed of bleeding from PVI and the hemody­namic status of the patient, as per ATLS protocols.
30.4.2 Indication
According to ATLS guidelines, the evaluation starts with a computed tomography angiography (CTA) in a stable patient, which helps to assess the type and extent of the injury and shortlist the candidates for embolization, reveals additional injuries, and serves as baseline mapping [22]. The ideal can­didates for angioembolization are:
1. The presence of hard signs on clinical examination and
CT angiographic signs of a hemorrhagic pattern of peripheral arterial injury in hemodynamically stable patients following blunt trauma.
2. Unrecognized or delayed-onset peripheral vascular injury
in follow-up cases of extremity fractures, managed non­operatively, and subsequently developed a hemorrhagic type of arterial injury.
30.3.8 Complications
Complications are rare and can be local site complications or rebleeding after embolization. Others are bilioma formation, hepatic necrosis/ischemia, liver abscess, gallbladder necro­sis, abdominal compartment syndrome, and peritonitis [16].

30.4 Peripheral Vascular Injuries (PVI)

30.4.1 Background
Vascular trauma (VT) accounts for 1% of all traumatic inju­ries to extremities [17]. Three types of traumatic mechanisms can lead to PVI blunt, penetrating, and a combination of both. Peripheral vascular injury manifests either in hemor­rhagic form or ischemic form; hence, early recognition and prompt treatment are important for good outcomes [1820].
The clinical manifestations of arterial injuries are divided
into hard and soft signs depending on the pattern of injury
Technique Includes patient preparation, procedure,
approaches, the embolic agent used, and post-procedural care. The planning is based on CT angiography ndings, which provide not only the characteristics of injury but also a roadmap to localize the bleeder site.
30.4.3 Patient Preparation
In an acute trauma setting patient preparation is the same for all the IR procedures.
30.4.4 Procedure (Figs.30.5 and30.6)
The contralateral (retrograde) or ipsilateral (antegrade) com­mon femoral approach for arterial access is chosen based on the site of injury. For example, the contralateral transfemoral retrograde approach is used for proximal supercial femoral