Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
19 Vascular Thoracic Interventions
ab c
de f
213
Fig. 19.3 (a) Selective angiogram of a pathological right intercostal artery in a patient with hemoptysis demonstrates features of Hypertrophy (dashed arrow), hypervascularity (white arrow) and Tortuosity (solid black arrow) of the vessel. (b) Left bronchial arteriogram in a patient with hemoptysis demonstrates hypertrophy (black arrow) and hyper­vascularity (white arrow) of the left bronchial artery. (c) Left superior intercostal arteriogram in a patient with hemoptysis demonstrates neo­vascularity (solid black arrow) of the branches in the region of the dis-
19.2.2.4 Tips andTricks
• Study the CT angiography carefully and plan the
procedure.
• Evaluate the likely site of bleeding on CT and make a
priority-based list of the arteries to be embolized.
• Use different catheters based on the anatomy/branching
pattern if difculty in hooking the arteries.
• Always do super selective catheterization before injecting
embolizing agent.
eased left upper lobe. (d) Lateral thoracic arteriogram revealing tortuosity (dotted arrow), neovascularity (white arrow) and bronchopul­monary shunting (solid black arrow) in a patient with hemoptysis. (e) Right intercostobronchial arteriogram showing neovascularity in paren­chymal branches of the bronchial component (black arrow). (f) Right bronchial angiogram showing hypertrophy (black dotted arrow), Neovascularity (black solid arrow), and bronchopulmonary shunting (solid black arrow)
• In difcult-to-cannulate subclavian artery branches, use radial artery approach.
• If the patient continues to bleed after embolization of all the culprit arteries, consider pulmonary artery emboliza­tion to close the shunt.
The detailed pulmonary artery interventions are covered
in Chap. 19.
214
de
bc
J. Kazimi et al.
a
Fig. 19.4 (a) Right bronchial arteriogram in a patient with hemoptysis reveals hypertrophy (black arrow), tortuosity (white arrow) and neovas­cularity (star). (b) Slightly delayed run reveals the bronchopulmonary shunting (dotted arrow) present. (c) Selective arteriogram demonstrates ectopic bronchial artery (black arrow) arising from the right subclavian artery. (d) Selective arteriogram of the right internal mammary artery in
a patient with hemoptysis demonstrates hypertrophy (solid black arrow), neovascularity (dotted arrow) and bronchopulmonary shunting (asterisk). (e) Left superior intercostal artery angiogram demonstrating neovascularity (black arrow) and bronchopulmonary shunting (white arrow)
19 Vascular Thoracic Interventions
Fig. 19.5 Native angiogram showing an ectopic bronchial artery aris­ing from the left subclavian artery and supplying the left lung parenchyma

19.3 Pulmonary Artery Pseudoaneurysm (PAPA)/Pulmonary AVM (PAVM) Embolization

19.3.1 Pre-Procedure Evaluation
Split bolus CT angiography or CT pulmonary angiography is the best modality for diagnosis and planning.
PAPA—CT is also helpful in assessing the cause of PAPA (Fig.19.6). The most common mechanism is erosion of the vessel wall induced by an adjoining lung infection [7]. Other causes include neoplasms, trauma, and iatrogenic [1].
PAVM—Contrast echocardiography is used as a screen­ing test and is based on right to left shunt created by PAVMs. If contrast appears in the left atrium within three heartbeats after injection, it is considered positive. CT has higher sensi­tivity than DSA for picking up PAVMs—83 vs. 70% [8]. They typically appear on CT as a well-dened peripheral, rounded, or lobulated solid nodule with the presence of a single (simple PAVM) or multiple (complex PAVM) feeding artery and one or more tortuous efferent draining veins.
19.3.1.1 Indications forPAVM Embolization [9]
• Any (solitary or multiple) PAVM with the following
features:
– Feeding artery having 2mm or greater diameter. – Increase in size of venous sac or feeding artery. – Symptomatic hypoxaemia. – Paradoxical emboli.
215
19.3.1.2 Technique
The treatment options for PAPA include:
• Endovascular coil embolization—is generally the most commonly used treatment option.
• Endovascular stent grafts or stent-assisted coil emboliza­tion—to maintain vascular patency.
• Percutaneous USG/CT-guided thrombin/glue injection— used in peripherally placed pseudoaneurysms surrounded by consolidation (Fig.19.7).
On DSA, PAPAs are classied into four types [1]. Type A
PAPA is characterized by patent feeding pulmonary artery without any bronchial or non-bronchial systemic feeder. Type B has feeders from bronchial or non-bronchial sys­temic arteries and pulmonary arteries. Type C has only bron­chial or non-bronchial systemic artery feeders. Type D PAPAs have the same occlusion of the feeding pulmonary artery as type C PAPAs, but they also have slow systemic arterial opacication that cannot be detected on catheter­directed angiography.
For type A and B PAPAs, both BAE and pulmonary artery
embolization are done. For types C and D, rst BAE is done and then percutaneous glue/thrombin injection is done if the patient continues to bleed.
The goal of PAVM embolization is to close the feeder
arteries as close as possible to the nidus (Fig. 19.8). All possible care should be taken to prevent air bubbles in the catheter system as it can lead to paradoxical embolism. The hub of the catheter should be kept under water in water bath, and all wire exchanges should be done under water.
Access route—The femoral vein route is used to access
the pulmonary artery. ECG leads should be placed to monitor for arrhythmia while crossing the right heart chambers with catheters and wires.
Sheaths and catheters—Usually a 6F 11 cm vascular
sheath is used in adults for maintaining vascular access. Longer (7F 90 cm) sheaths can be used to maintain stability and give strength to the catheter and microcatheters. 5F Picard catheter and 2.7F Progreat microcatheter are used to deploy microcoils.
Embolic agent—Platinum coils/microcoils are the most
commonly used embolizing agent. Coil diameter should be 20–25% larger than the artery to be embolized [9]. Vascular plugs are becoming more and more popular for PAVM embo­lization as they have the ability to occlude large-diameter feeding arteries with single plugs (thus reducing procedure time and radiation exposure) and occlusion over a shorter length of vessel, thereby reducing the likelihood of occlud­ing vessels supplying normal lung [10]. Vascular plugs should be oversized by 30–50% relative to the target vessel diameter at the occlusion site.
216
bc
ab c
J. Kazimi et al.
Fig. 19.6 CT chest angio images in a patient with a past history of pulmonary tuberculosis admitted to the hospital with acute hemoptysis. Coronal (a), axial (b) images in the mediastinal and axial lung window
images (c) at the same level show a large cavity in the left upper lobe (cross) and pseudoaneurysm in the wall of the cavity (white arrows)
a
de
Fig. 19.7 CT Chest angiography coronal MIP image (a) reveals a pul- monary AVM (solid white arrow) in right lower lobe with VRT image (b) depicting the feeding artery (dotted white arrow) and the draining vein (dashed white arrow). Subtraction angiography image (c) in the
After femoral vein puncture and securing access with vas­cular sheath, the catheter (Picard 5F) with guidewire is passed through IVC, right atrium, right ventricle and main pulmonary artery. The catheter is then directed towards right or left pulmonary artery depending upon the diseased seg­ment. The sheath can then be exchanged over exchange length wire with a longer sheath for stability. The feeding
same patient shows the pulmonary AVM. After deployment of an Amplatzer vascular plug II in the feeding artery (solid black arrow) and an adjacent coil (arrowhead) in another small feeding artery (d), a native angiogram (e) shows closure of the pulmonary AVM
artery is then superselectively accessed using catheter and guidewire and taking DSA runs for guidance. Once the cath­eter is secure within the target artery, microcatheter and wire (Progreat microcatheter) are used to cross the neck of the pseudoaneurysm. Microcoils (18-x-x) are then deployed to close the backdoor, neck, and front door of the PAPA.If the size of the artery is large, coils (35-x-x) can be deployed
19 Vascular Thoracic Interventions
217
a
bc
de
Fig. 19.8 (a) CT Angiogram chest before the procedure shows a pseu- doaneurysm (solid white arrow) within the wall of a cavity in RML with surrounding consolidation. (b) In supine position, a 22G needle (dotted white arrow) has been inserted into the pseudoaneurysm, perpendicu­larly to the pleural surface, through the parenchymal consolidation, in order to reduce the risk of pneumothorax. (c) The peri-procedure CT
scan in sagittal plane shows the correct positioning of the needle (white arrowhead) within the pseudoaneurysm, followed by injection of 20–30% of 0.2ml glue. Final CT angiogram (d and e) in sagittal and axial mediastinal window demonstrates complete lling of the pseudo­aneurysm (solid white arrows) and the artery feeding it with non­opacication of the pseudoaneurysm
using the main catheter (5F Picard). If the catheter cannot be advanced beyond the pseudoaneurysm neck, glue may be used for distal embolization followed by proximal coil embolization. A repeat DSA run is taken after 10minutes from the main catheter to conrm the thrombosis of PAPA.For PAVM embolization, the microcatheter should be placed as close to the nidus as possible, beyond any normal vessel supplying the parenchyma. The guiding catheter should also be as close as possible to provide support during coil deployment. In a large feeding artery anchor technique, scaffold technique or balloon-occlusion technique can be used to prevent coil migration. Similar to coils, vascular plugs should also be deployed as distal as possible. They have a relatively rigid delivery system which carries the plug, through the catheter to the site of embolization. The plug is anchored to the delivery system by a screw mechanism which is manually turned counterclockwise to deploy the plug.
19.3.2 Post-Procedure Care
Neurological examination should be done to rule out signi­cant air embolism. Patients should be monitored for 24hours in the hospital and can be discharged after that. The primary
disease should be further evaluated and treated to prevent recurrent haemoptysis.
19.3.3 Complications
• Air embolism
• Post-embolization syndrome
• Rupture of the pseudoaneurysm can rarely occur
• Non-target embolization.
19.3.4 Tips andTricks
• Study the CT angiography and plan the size of coils to be employed accordingly.
• Keep one size larger and one size smaller coils readily available as DSA vessel size may differ from CT angiog­raphy because of spasm.
• Keep an eye on the ECG monitor while crossing right heart chambers for arrhythmia.
• Before deploying coil, make sure that your catheter has sufcient length inside the artery of interest to prevent non-target embolization.
• Use coaxial technique, scaffold technique and anchor technique for precise deployment.
218
J. Kazimi et al.
19.4 Interventions inSuperior Vena Cava Syndrome
Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome refers to a group of signs and symptoms specic to anatomic regions drained by SVC, resulting from any disease process (malignant or benign) that leads to partial or complete obstruction of blood ow through the SVC (Table 19.4). Clinical features can range from mild to severe (Table19.5) and presentation can range from acute life-threatening to indolent.
Endovenous intervention has emerged as a rst-line treat­ment for the management of severe or life-threatening SVC syndrome irrespective of aetiology [1]. For grade 1 or 2 symptoms in malignant SVC obstruction, endovenous inter­vention is reserved for persistent or recurrent symptoms fol­lowing tumour-specic treatment. There is insufcient evidence to support primary SVC stenting in asymptomatic individuals [1].
Scoring system of Kishi is used to quantify gravity of symptoms and provides a cut-off score for endovascular stenting (Table19.6) [2]. A score above 4 is an indication of SVC endoprosthesis. While the role of SVC stenting is well established in malignant obstruction, in benign SVC obstruc-
tion the current trend is towards using endovascular repair as rst-line therapy and reserving open surgical repair for patients who fail endovenous interventions [3].
19.4.1 Pre-Procedure Evaluation
Contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT (CECT) has a high degree of sensitivity in determining the location and severity of SVCO (Fig.19.9) [4]. CT also provides information rele­vant to technical success of intervention such as demonstra­tion of the extent of involvement and any thrombosis [4, 5]. Sensitivity and specicity of MRI in diagnosing SVCO approach 100% [6, 7]. Length of venous obstruction, involve- ment of brachiocephalic veins and presence of acute throm­bosis are important factors to assess on CECT or MRI.
Diagnostic venography is usually performed prior to stenting, and it provides information about the location and the severity of the disease thereby guiding the precise deploy­ment of stent [1].
19.4.2 Technique
Table 19.4 Causes of SVC syndrome
Malignant Benign External compression/
inltration Lung cancer
Lymphoma Metastasis Sarcoma Plasmacytoma
Table 19.5 Grading of symptoms due to SVC syndrome
Grade Severity Clinical ndings 0 Asymptomatic Only radiological feature of SVCO 1 Mild Vascular distension of head and neck
2 Moderate Dysphagia, impairment of jaw, head or
3 Severe Cerebral oedema (headache/dizziness)
4 Life-
threatening
5 Fatal Death
External compression Intraluminal brosis
Tumours Fibrosing mediastinitis
vessels, oedema of face and neck, cyanosis
eyelid movements, visual disturbances
Laryngeal oedema Syncope after bending
Cerebral oedema (confusion, obtundation) Laryngeal oedema (stridor) Syncope without precipitating factors Hypotension Renal insufciency
Indwelling catheter related Intracardiac devices like pacemakers TB Hypercoagulable state Idiopathic Syphilis
Femoral, internal jugular, subclavian or upper limb veins can be used as the site of access, which is determined by favour­able anatomy and operator preference. Common femoral veins and IJVs are the most used sites for access owing to least access-related complication rates [8].
A diagnostic venogram is performed prior to denitive intervention and provides information regarding the extent of the disease, collaterals and coexisting thrombus. If exten­sive thrombus is seen, pharmacomechanical therapies should be considered [9]. After preliminary cavogram, the next step
Table 19.6 Scoring system for symptoms due to SVC syndrome
Signs and symptoms Grade Neurologic symptoms
Blackout, coma Dizziness, blurry vision, headache, amnesia Altered mental status Unease
Laryngopharyngeal or thoracic symptoms Laryngeal oedema/orthopnoea Shortness of breath, hoarseness, stridor, dysphagia, tongue
swelling
Pleural effusion/cough Nasal and facial signs or symptoms
Epistaxis or rhinorrhoea, lip oedema, nasal stiffness Facial swelling
Venous dilatation Neck vein or arm vein distension, upper extremity
swelling or upper body plethora
Note: Total score is calculated as the sum of the highest grade in each class
4 3 2 1
3 2 1
2 1
1
ab
19 Vascular Thoracic Interventions
Fig. 19.9 CT angiography chest images in a patient with known small cell carcinoma reveals a homogenous, conuent, mildly enhancing soft-tissue attenuation lesion (white arrow) centred in the mediastinum (a).The lesion is causing complete encasement and marked luminal narrowing of the SVC (white arrow in a and b) with chest wall collaterals (short arrow) in (a) and mediastinal collaterals (arrowhead) in (a). Coronal images in (c) show paratracheal and subcarinal extent of the lesion with complete extent of the SVC encasement (dashed white arrow) depicted in image (d)
219
c d
is to cross the stenosis or occlusion by a guidewire followed by angioplasty and/or stenting. If the site of obstruction can­not be crossed, a different access site can be attempted. Antegrade-retrograde access from femoral and internal jugu­lar or upper limb veins can be tried in difcult situations. Snare can also be used to establish a through and through or “body-oss” access to increase stability in difcult cases [10].
Once occlusive lesion is crossed balloon pre-dilatation should be done which helps in easy crossing of the stent delivery system. Consensus is lacking in routine pre­dilatation and in determining the appropriate size of balloon. Authors following routine serial slow pre-dilatation claim less SVC ruptures; however, evidence is lacking and univer­sally not practised [1013]. If brachiocephalic or subclavian veins are involved, bilateral ‘kissing’ or ‘Y’ stenting can be done; however, extension of the stent to either brachioce-
seen in about 70–80% patients in whom pre-dilatation was not done [13, 18, 19].
Completion venogram excludes complications like rup­ture and conrms appropriate placement of stent with good ow and disappearance of collaterals. Complete coverage of the session with <30% residual stenosis is considered as technical success [13, 20].
Most commonly self-expanding bare metal stents are used [5, 13, 1618]. Generally, stents should be oversized by 2mm with reference to vessel diameter of normal-appearing segment on CT or Venogram, to prevent stent migration [13,
19]. Technical success rate for SVC stenting ranges from
95% to 100% [4, 5, 16]. Stents are 87–100% in relieving SVCO at initial presentation [21]. Covered stents have supe­rior patency rate in malignant SVCO [22]. Stenting offer more rapid and sustained relief from symptoms compared to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [2326].
phalic veins is satisfactory for symptomatic relief [5, 1317].
Stents with diameter > 16 mm were associated with
higher rates of rupture, tamponade and pulmonary oedema
19.4.3 Complications
[5]. Stents with diameters up to 24mm can be deployed [13].
Landing zones of at least 10mm should be available for optimum length estimation. Sixty percent of this excess length should be placed at proximal landing zone, extending to brachiocephalic vein if needed, to reduce the risk of distal migration [19]. For longer lesions, telescoping stents can be used. Post dilatation may be required in residual stenosis,
Major complications like rupture, tamponade, arrhythmias, stent migrations, infection and thrombotic events have been reported in approximately 4% of cases [1, 22]. Complication risk is statistically greater with stents >16 mm, occlusive lesions, associated thrombosis and bare metal stent [5]. Covered stents are associated with increased risk of migra-
220
J. Kazimi et al.
tion and covering brachiocephalic conuence [28]. Minor complications occur in 3.2% of cases. Puncture site haema­toma, re-stenosis and pain in the chest are considered minor complications [28]. Complications associated with stenting and chemo-radio-therapy are comparable [29].
Acute overload syndrome with pulmonary oedema can occur following SVC recanalization requiring treatment with diuretics, PPV support and monitoring in ICU.Inadequate vessel measurement and subsequent suspicious stent sizing can lead to stent migration into RA with signicant morbid­ity and mortality [19].
19.4.4 Post-Procedure Follow-Up
There is lack of consensus among studies regarding the type, duration and efcacy of anticoagulation therapy post stent­ing [1, 5, 17, 3032]. Long-term anticoagulation therapy with aspirin, heparin or warfarin did not appear to reduce the risk of re-thrombosis [5, 31]. On the contrary, bleeding risk increases.
Post-procedural follow-up is done using CT [25]. For per­sistent or recurrent symptoms, repeat venography and inter­ventions like thrombus aspiration, thrombolysis and re-stenting may be required.
Multiple factors impact the management such as aetiol­ogy (Table19.1), local expertise, age and rate of chyle accu­mulation [35]. For most patients with low volume (i.e., <1L per day) post-operative chyle leaks or with chylothorax for nonsurgical reasons (e.g., malignancy), conservative therapy is suggested rather than the more invasive options (e.g., pleurodesis with or without percutaneous thoracic duct embolization (TDE), or surgical interventions).
For most patients with high-output (i.e., >1 L per day) post-operative chyle leaks, early intervention is suggested rather than prolonged conservative therapy. Percutaneous interventional techniques such as TDE/thoracic duct disrup­tion (TDD) or therapeutic lymphangiography with Lipiodol have gained popularity as the initial management [36, 37].
19.5.1 Pre-Procedure Evaluation
Pre-procedure evaluation should include assessment of the aetiology, anatomy of the thoracic duct, site of leak and level of obstruction. Lymphangiography and cross-sectional imag­ing play an important role in providing information regarding these parameters. Lymphatic abnormalities are evaluated by the non-invasive imaging techniques, MRI lymphangiography and CT lymphangiography which are preferred over conven­tional lymphangiography for comprehensive assessment [38].

19.5 Thoracic Duct Interventions

19.5.2 Lymphangiography Technique
Chylothorax is a form of lipid effusion and refers to accumu­lation of chyle within pleural cavity, resulting from obstruc­tion or disruption of the thoracic duct or one of its major tributaries [33]. The causes of chylothroax are summarized in Table19.7. Triglyceride concentration in the pleural uid of >110mg/dl is used for diagnosis of chylothorax, a level less than 50mg/dl excludes the possibility of chylothorax, and a level between 50 and 110mg/dl requires chylomicrons analysis on electrophoresis [34].
Table 19.7 Causes of chylothorax
Non-traumatic Traumatic Malignant Non-malignant Surgical Non-surgical Lymphoma
Other malignancies (e.g., mediastinal, metastatic malignancies, primary lung malignancy, sarcoma, leukaemia)
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Intestinal lymphangiectasis Lupus Tuberculosis Sarcoidosis Venous thrombosis Tuberous sclerosis Filariasis Heart failure Down syndrome Noonan syndrome Idiopathic Protein losing enteropathy Cirrhosis
Lymphangiography involves instillation of a contrast agent into the lymphatic system. Contrast can be administered either into the interstitial spaces in the dorsal web spaces of feet or directly into the lymphatic channel at the dorsum of the foot or within the cortico-medullary junction of inguinal lymph node, respectively called as pedal and intranodal lym­phangiography. For TDE/TDD intranodal lymphangiogra­phy is preferred.
Cardiovascular Aortic Esophagectomy Lobectomy Pneumonectomy Mediastinal mass resection Bochdalek herniorrhaphy Central venous catheterization Neck surgery Spine surgery Pacemaker insertion
Penetrating or Non-penetrating Trauma to the neck, Thorax and upper Abdomen Vomiting Coughing Yawning Straining
19 Vascular Thoracic Interventions
221
Intranodal lymphangiography is performed under USG guidance with a needle-syringe system. The system consists of a spinal needle connected to the syringe by a connector. A 25G x 3.5 inch spinal needle is connected to a 3ml polycar­bonate syringe by 6-inch connector tube with a volume of approx. 2 ml [39]. Bilateral inguinal nodes are commonly chosen sites, and the most distal lymph node is punctured with the needle. Shallow needle angle favours better anchor­ing of the needle in skin and sub-cutaneous tissue. A con­trolled jab helps in penetrating node capsule. Needle tip should be positioned at cortico-medullary junction. Hilar position results in venous intravasations [39].
Contrast Agent: Water-based contrast agents like gado­linium and non-ionic iodinated contrast agents or oil-based agents like lipiodol can be used. Lipiodol is the preferred agent for TDE, as it stays within the lymphatic system, and in cases of leak it has been shown to seal the site of leak by promoting inammation around the site of extravasation [40]. A total of 0.1ml/kg is given in each limb. In adults, the upper limit for each limb is 10ml and 14ml for both limbs combined. Lipiodol is given at a slow rate of
0.2–0.4 ml/min either manually or using the dedicated lymphangiogram pump or more commonly an advanced anaesthesia injection pump is used. A dose of >20 ml should be cautiously used especially in lympho-venous communication. Upward serial uoroscopic spot images are obtained every 5–10 minutes over the course of Lipiodol injection [41].
19.5.3 Thoracic Duct Embolization Technique
There are essentially three steps of thoracic duct emboliza­tion: cannulation of the duct followed by direct ductography and then embolization with glue and/or coils.
Cannulation of duct: Key to successful cannulation is identication of cisterna chyli (CC) which is located at L1– L2 level, CC is identied by inow point. At this point lym­phatic ducts quickly lose their denition and clarity, because of lymphatic inow from intestinal and hepatic lymphatics. Thoracic duct should be accessed below this point through one of the lumbar lymphatic ducts preferably on the right side to prevent access point leakage. Once the site of punc­ture is identied, cannulation is performed with 21 or 22G, 15 to 20cm chiba needle (Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN). A 5–10 degree angulation at distal 2 cm of needle provides directionality [42]. Aortic puncture should be avoided by a right transabdominal approach.
The target duct is accessed in 15–20 degree left posterior oblique uroscopic view and as cranio-caudal angulation after local anaesthesia [38]. Quick deliberate jabs can help ensure that the needle passes directly through compliant intervening structures like small and large bowels without
signicant deection. Puncture should be made across the duct, and after this, probing is done using a stiff 0.018 inch/0.014 inch guidewire.
Once the lumen of the duct is approached, the wire should advance easily into the upper thoracic duct (TD). This smooth advancement indicates that the wire has cor­rectly entered the lumen. If the tip of wire does not advance smoothly straight up the duct, it should be pulled back into the needle. The needle is then withdrawn by a fraction of mm, and the duct is probed again in a similar manner. This process is repeated until the wire either advances into the lymphatic duct or the needle tip is no longer in proximity to the target point. In the latter case, another puncture attempt should be made. After successful access microcatheter is advanced over the wire. Wire is then removed, and contrast agent is injected with 1 ml syringe to detect site of leak [38]. Once identied, embolization of TD is started proxi­mal to leak. First a coil should be deployed to provide matrix for glue embolization. Microcatheter should be ushed with a maximum of 0.2ml of 5% dextrose. Large amounts of 5% dextrose can accumulate in TD thereby delaying glue polymerization and subsequently resulting in recanalization of glue cast. Fifty percent of n-butyl cyano­acrylate (n-BCA) (Trull, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ) is used for embolization, which provides ample time for polymerization.
Retrograde access to the central lymphatic system offers an alternative to the transabdominal approach by providing descending entry through either transvenous or transcervical methods. Transvenous access is commonly performed via the left upper arm, where a 5fr reverse curve catheter is intro­duced through the left subclavian vein to cross the terminal valves of the thoracic duct. In contrast, transcervical access involves the use of a 22-gauge needle to puncture the cervi­cal portion of the thoracic duct, guided by uoroscopy, ultra­sound or both, with a microwire then advanced towards the cisterna chyli. These retrograde approaches are particularly advantageous in patients with coagulopathy or large abdo­mens, as they avoid the need for a transabdominal puncture. Additionally, these approaches provide a valuable option when the target is not identied during lymphangiography. Retrograde techniques can be used along with transabdomi­nal techniques to facilitate treatment of non-traumatic lym­phatic disorder and providing the ability to perform procedures like lymphatic drainage, balloon plasty or stent­ing. However, challenges include dealing with anatomical variations, such as thick or short neck, tortuous or plexiform terminations of TD and anomalous course of TD [43, 44].
The reported technical success for TD catheterization is about 67% [45]. Clinical success rate has been reported as high as 90% [45]. Thoracic duct disruption provides 55% clinical success rate [45]. Success is higher with coil and glue combination (91%) compared to coil alone (84%) [45].
222
J. Kazimi et al.
19.5.4 Complications
19.5.4.1 Complications Related toLymphangiography
Most commonly encountered complication is extravasation [46] which rarely results in a major complication. Transient pain, fever and vomiting can occur [47]. Major complica­tions related to pulmonary, cerebral and visceral oil emboli­zation can occur [46]. Pulmonary oil embolism occurs due to migration of oil from TD into venous side [48], seen more commonly in cases with lymphatic obstruction [49]. Pulmonary infarction (0.25%), pulmonary oedema (0.03%), lipoid pneumonia (0.04%) and haemoptysis have been reported [50]. ARDS and Lofer syndrome have also been described [51]. Cerebral embolism can manifest within min­utes to hours after lymphangiography with seizures or altered mental status [52]. Cerebral embolism is seen in patients with right to left shunt, lympho-venous shunts to the pulmo­nary veins. Another mechanism proposed is loss of ltering capability of pulmonary capillaries due to ethiodized oil overload [52]. Hepatic and renal artery oil embolism have also been reported [53, 54].
19.5.4.2 Central Lymphatic Access Complications
Percutaneous transabdominal approach is the most com­monly used technique [55]. This approach can transgress vascular and visceral structures causing complications like perihepatic haemorrhage, periaortic haematoma, bile perito­nitis and pancreatitis [56, 57].
19.5.5 Contraindications toThoracic Duct
Embolization
• Allergy to contrast agents.
• In-correctable coagulopathy.
• Severe pulmonary disease.
• Right to left shunt.
• Abdominal aortic aneurysm [58].

References

1. Uberoi R. Quality assurance guidelines for superior vena cava stenting in malignant disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29(3):319–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270- 005- 0284- 9. PMID: 16502166.
2. Kishi K, Sonomura T, Mitsuzane K, Nishida N, Yang RJ, Sato M, etal. Self-expandable metallic stent therapy for superior vena cava syndrome: clinical observations. Radiology. 1993;189:531–5.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.189.2.8210386.
3. Deshwal H, Ghosh S, Magruder K, Bartholomew JR, Montgomery J, Mehta AC. A review of endovascular stenting for supe­rior vena cava syndrome in brosing mediastinitis. Vasc Med.
2020;25(2):174–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X19884130. Epub 2019 Dec 5. PMID: 31804157.
4. Eren S, Karaman A, Okur A. The superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant disease. Imaging with multi-detector row CT.Eur J Radiol. 2006;59(1):93–103.
5. Fagedet D, et al. Endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome: results and predictive factors of clinical ef­cacy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(1):140–9.
6. Lin J, et al. Vena cava 3D contrast-enhanced MR venography: a pictorial review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28(6):795–805.
7. Thornton MJ, et al. A three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venography technique for imaging central veins. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(4):999–1003.
8. Miller JH, McBride K, etal. Malignant superior vena cava obstruc­tion: stent placement via the subclavian route. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2000;23:155–8.
9. Da Ines D, etal. Cardiac tamponade after malignant superior vena cava stenting: two case reports and brief review of the literature. Acta Radiol. 2010;51(3):256–9.
10. Kee ST, et al. Superior vena cava syndrome: treatment with catheter- directed thrombolysis and endovascular stent placement. Radiology. 1998;206(1):187–93.
11. Jean-Baptiste R, Williams DM, Gemmete JJ. Successful treat­ment of superior vena cava rupture with placement of a cov­ered stent: a report of two cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(3):667–71.
12. Lanciego C, Chacon JL, Julian A, etal. Stenting as rst option for endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:585–93.
13. Mokry T, Bellemann N, Sommer CM, etal. Retrospective study in 23 patients of the self-expanding sinus-XL stent for treatment of malignant superior vena cava obstruction caused by non-small cell lung cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(3):357–65.
14. Lau KY, Tan LT, Wong WW, et al. Brachiocephalic-superior vena cava metallic stenting in malignant superior vena cava obstruction. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2003;32(4):461–5.
15. Dinkel HP, Mettke B, Schmid F, et al. Endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome: is bilateral wallstent placement superior to unilateral placement? J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10(4):788–97.
16. Ganeshan A, etal. Superior vena caval stenting for SVC obstruc­tion: current status. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(2):343–9.
17. Oudkerk M, etal. Self-expanding metal stents for palliative treat­ment of superior vena caval syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;19(3):146–51.
18. Dyet JF, Nicholson AA, Cook AM.The use of the Wallstent endo­vascular prosthesis in the treatment of malignant obstruction of the superior vena cava. Clin Radiol. 1993;48:381–5.
19. Taylor JD, Lehmann ED, Belli AM, et al. Strategies for the man­agement of SVC stent migration into the right atrium. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30(5):1003–9.
20. Rizvi AZ, etal. Benign superior vena cava syndrome: stenting is now the rst line of treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(2):372–80.
21. Nguyen NP, et al. Safety and effectiveness of vascular endo­prosthesis for malignant superior vena cava syndrome. Thorax. 2009;64(2):174–8.
22. Gwon DI, etal. Malignant superior vena cava syndrome: a compar­ative cohort study of treatment with covered stents versus uncov­ered stents. Radiology. 2013;266(3):979–87.
23. Tanigawa N, et al. Clinical outcome of stenting in superior vena cava syndrome associated with malignant tumors. Comparison with conventional treatment. Acta Radiol. 1998;39(6):669–74.
24. Nicholson AA, etal. Treatment of malignant superior vena cava obstruction: metal stents or radiation therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8(5):781–8.