Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
Endovascular Treatment ofAcute Stroke
LeveJosephDevarajanSebastian andSavyasachiJain
12
Key Messages
1. Current trials and guidelines have opened new vistas and a surge in demand for endovascular management in acute stroke.
2. Imaging techniques like multiphasic CT angiography, CT perfusion, or MRI and MR perfusion help in the manage­ment of acute stroke.
3. Working algorithm for the management of acute stroke is essential.
4. Neurointerventionists should be aware of all the technical aspects of mechanical thrombectomy.

12.1 Introduction

Large vessel occlusions (LVOs) account for up to 40% of acute ischemic strokes (AIS) worldwide and a greater pro­portion of disabling or fatal strokes [1]. Re-establishing cere­bral perfusion by quickly recanalizing the occluded vessel (within a certain short time frame) has been proven in many randomized clinical trials to improve clinical outcomes. Historically, intravenous infusion of thrombolytic agents (IVT), intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT), and mechanical thrombectomy were the methods employed to recanalize acute LVOs. IVT along with supportive medical manage­ment, which came to be termed as “standard medical treat­ment for acute stroke,” has been the mainstay of treatment for the early window (<4.5h from stroke onset, now being extended up to 9h) LVO strokes. First-generation mechani­cal thrombectomy (MT) devices were not efcient in recana­lizing the LVOs, and, hence, standard medical treatment retained its primacy till the second decade of the current cen­tury when newer (second generation) devices, namely, sten­trievers and aspiration catheters, were introduced. The publication, in 2015, of the results of the ve landmark trials
L. J. D. Sebastian (*) · S. Jain Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuro-radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
(MR-CLEAN, SWIFT-PRIME, REVASCAT, ESCAPE, and EXTEND-IA) that employed these newer MT devices estab­lished the superiority of endovascular treatment over stan­dard medical treatment alone in LVO stroke [26]. Consequently, the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Stroke Association (ASA) 2018 guidelines gave a class I recommendation for MT with stentrievers for AIS due to LVO in adults (>18years) in whom treatment can be initiated within 6h of stroke onset [7]. Even those pre­senting in a 6–24-h time window can benet from MT sub­ject to meeting certain imaging-based eligibility criteria as per DAWN or DEFUSE3 trials.
These trial results and guidelines have opened new vistas and a surge in demand for neurointerventionalists. Yet the rigors of day-to-day practice dictate that one pays attention to the following two important aspects to be able to provide a fruitful service. They are (1) case selection and (2) knowl­edge and skill in various endovascular techniques. We attempt to address the same in brief in the following sections.
12.2 Case Selection forMechanical
Thrombectomy
A review of basic pathophysiological mechanisms of acute stroke that underlie the case selection principles is pertinent here.
(i) Brain tissue cannot tolerate ischemia for long. A few
minutes after LVO, a variable number of brain cells in the supply area begin to die. The growing volume of such irreversibly injured brain tissue is called core (infarct). Similarly, a surrounding or adjacent volume of tissue supplied by the now-occluded artery manages to survive by drawing some perfusion from the adjacent circulation through “collaterals.” This surviving but dysfunctional tissue is named penumbra [8].
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 S. H. Chandrashekhara (ed.), Textbook of Interventional Radiology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9601-4_12
119
120
L. J. D. Sebastian and S. Jain
(ii) With time, more of the penumbra succumbs to isch-
emia, i.e., the core enlarges, unless blood ow is restored to the region. Time is the most important vari­able inuencing core growth and so is the adage: “Time is Brain.”
(iii) However, the rate of growth of core may vary among
individual patients. Thus, there are “fast growers” and “slow growers” as well. The status of collaterals, or more precisely the failure of the same, is the most important factor affecting the rate of infarct growth.
(iv) Hence, in a given patient, apart from assessing the
chronological timing of stroke onset, we have to assess the core-penumbra status also at the time of presenta­tion. The latter is termed “tissue-timing.” Imaging techniques like multiphasic CT angiography, CT perfu­sion, or MRI and MR perfusion help in this regard. Those with a substantial volume of penumbra will ben­et from the recanalization of the LVO.
In spite of advances in the understanding of stroke patho­physiology as outlined above, it is nearly impossible to pre­scribe a set of uniform or denite selection criteria that can determine the eligibility of a random patient presenting with AIS for endovascular treatment. Based on the data collated from multiple RCTs and the guidelines prescribed by AHA, the following working algorithm can be drawn up:
(i) The most important variables to be considered are age,
pre-stroke morbidity, severity at presentation as best represented by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), time of onset, level of vascular occlu­sion, and status of brain parenchyma as determined by imaging. Adult patients (>18 years) with pre-stroke morbidity modied Rankin score (mRS) 2, acute large vessel occlusion, signicant neurological decits (NIHSS>6), and presenting within 24h are considered eligible for MT [7].
(ii) NCCT is acquired as the rst step in the imaging
workup, primarily to rule out intracranial hemorrhage. If an acute infarct is seen, the area involved is graded using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), which is available both for middle cere­bral artery (MCA) and posterior circulation infarcts, but has been clinically validated only for the former. The CT angiogram is used to locate the level of vascular occlusion.
(iii) For anterior circulation, LVOs further management
depends on the duration from stroke onset. If it is <6h,
(a) If there is clinical-radiological mismatch, i.e., there
is a signicant neurological decit (NIHSS> 6) and minimal or no infarct on NCCT
(ASPECTS>6), the patient can be shifted for MT after bridging IVT, and no further imaging workup is needed.
(b) In the rare instance of signicant infarct on NCCT
(ASPECTS  6), penumbral imaging is done as described in the next step.
(iv) For onset of 6–24 h and wake up stokes or stroke of
uncertain time of onset, advanced penumbral imaging is done as follows:
(a) Multiphasic CT angiogram is used to grade
collaterals.
(b) CT perfusion study provides the brain perfusion
parameters of cerebral blood volume (CBV), cere­bral blood ow (CBF), and time to maximum (TMax). Reduced CBV denotes the core, while CBF is reduced in the whole ischemic tissue, including the penumbra. Penumbra shows reduc­tion in CBF by 40%, which is thus denoted by the CBV-CBF mismatch. Penumbral tissue shows a TMax >6s while at the core it is >10s [9].
(c) MRI can also help in timing the stroke, especially
in wake-up stroke where a DWI-FLAIR mismatch signies an onset <4.5h. ASPECTS is determined best on DWI images, clarifying doubtful areas on NCCT.MRI moves a step further in assessing the penumbra by analyzing the DWI-Perfusion (ASL/ DSC perfusion) mismatch.
(d) Some centers prefer MRI over CT for penumbral
imaging. One should stick to a well-tested protocol for an institute, based on operator preferences, logistics, and results.
12.3 Technical Aspects ofMechanical Thrombectomy (Figs.12.1, 12.2, 12.3 and12.4)
There is no specic method or formula for the successful conduct of MT. Every interventionalist shall design his methods based on their training, experience, expertise acquired thereby, and the logistics available to them. What follows is a general guidance and a reminder of key aspects.
1. General vs local anesthesia:
Any interventionalist is comfortable performing the procedure in a still patient. It reduces overall procedure (recanalization) time and technical injuries (e.g., wire perforation) as well. However, general anesthesia (GA) has its own problems too: (i) delay in arranging GA will waste precious time, and (ii) fall in BP while inducing GA can lead to crashing of collaterals.
12 Endovascular Treatment ofAcute Stroke
121
a
e
b
f
c
d
g
Fig. 12.1 A 36-year-old gentleman, with previous history of rheumatic heart disease with mitral valve replacement, presented with left-sided hemiparesis and facial deviation to right. (a, b) Axial non-contrast CT images shows that apart from the chronic left MCA infarct (arrow in b), patient had hypodensities in right corona radiata (arrow in a). (c, d) CT
To circumvent these drawbacks, the anesthesia team should be readily available and preferably be a part of the stroke team. The anesthetist should be efcient and well trained so that quick induction without hypotension is achieved. Additional care is needed in cardiac patients. In the absence of such facilities or in cases of co-operative patients (non-dominant hemispheric stroke), it may be wiser to proceed with MT under local anesthesia [10].
2. Vascular access and co-axial guidance system: (a) An 8F femoral short sheath to begin with will save
precious time, and a coaxial system of 6F long sheath with a diagnostic catheter and 0.35 or 0.32 guidewire within can be taken directly via the sheath.
angiogram showed acute occlusion in right M1-MCA (arrow in c), with good collaterals (arrow in d). (e, f, g) CT Perfusion showed reduced CBF in the MCA territory (arrow in e), but maintained CBV (arrow in g). Patient was immediately taken up for MT.A hard clot was removed using Solumbra technique, and TICI-2B recanalization was achieved
(b) Long sheath—diagnostic catheter combinations can
be—80cm+Picard for shorter patients, 90cm long +120 cm vert/Picard for taller ones or long sheath +120cm SIM-II for type III aortic arch.
(c) In the rare cases of coarctation or diseased iliac arter-
ies or very unfavorable arch, anatomy radial access may be preferred [11].
(d) The long sheath-diagnostic catheter combination
should be negotiated straightaway to the target neck vessel as discerned by the CT angiography.
122
L. J. D. Sebastian and S. Jain
Fig. 12.2 Aspiration thrombectomy. (a, b) Antero-posterior (a) and lateral (b) views of right ICA angiogram shows complete occlusion of M1 segment of right MCA (arrows in a & b). (c) Fluoroscopy under roadmap guidance shows that the occlusion is crossed using a microcatheter and micro guidewire (white arrow) and suction catheter (black arrow) advanced up to the thrombus. (d) Check angiogram after suction thrombectomy shows complete recanalization of right MCA (arrow)
a
c
b
d
12 Endovascular Treatment ofAcute Stroke
123
a
b
c
Fig. 12.3 Mechanical thrombectomy using stentriever. (a) Antero- posterior view of left vertebral artery angiogram shows complete occlu­sion of distal basilar artery (arrow). (b) Lateral angiogram shows
a
Fig. 12.4 Mechanical thrombectomy using stentriever and aspiration. (a) Antero-posterior view of right CCA angiogram shows occlusion of M1 segment of right MCA (arrow). (b) Angiogram without subtraction shows stentriever (arrow) deployed across the thrombus. (c) Angiogram
b
c
stentriever (arrow) deployed from the right posterior cerebral artery into the basilar artery. (c) Check angiogram after thrombectomy shows recanalization of the basilar artery (arrow)
d
image showing aspiration catheter (arrow) advanced up to the throm­bus. (d) Check angiogram after thrombectomy using Solumbra tech­nique shows complete recanalization of right MCA (arrow)
124
L. J. D. Sebastian and S. Jain

12.4 Thrombectomy Techniques

Subsequent steps depend on the interventionalist’s choice of devices and technique for thrombectomy. Though a number of techniques and an equally prolic number of acronyms are described in the literature, they generally fall in one of the following: stentriever, aspiration, or combination of both. Irrespective of the techniques adopted, the goal of MT is to achieve complete or near complete recanalization of the occluded vessel and reperfusion of its supply area within a minimum possible time. Modied thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score is widely used for assessing recana­lization and reperfusion. An mTICI score of 2b or 3 is associ­ated with good clinical outcomes.

12.5 Aspiration Technique

(i) Aspiration or reperfusion catheters are of specialized
ones with attributes that allow them to be navigated dis­tally into the intracranial vessels safely and with ease. They have wide lumen and do not collapse while apply­ing suction pressure.
(ii) The aspiration catheter is navigated over a microcatheter-
guidewire assembly to the proximal end of the throm­bus occluding the artery. The microcatheter is then removed, and the aspiration catheter is maneuvered to engage the clot well (Fig.12.2). New generation reper­fusion catheters, as per manufacturers’ claim, can be navigated without the coaxial microcatheter system.
(iii) Once the catheter is placed in the desired position, suc-
tion pump is attached to the hub, and if the clot is well wedged into the clot, no blood ows to the pump canis­ter. If otherwise, the catheter is to be adjusted to engage the clot better.
(iv) A dwell time of a few minutes is allowed while the suc-
tion is on. Then the aspiration catheter is slowly pulled back, and as it reaches the proximal larger artery, blood may start to ow through the catheter into the canister which should be checked later for the aspirated clots. The catheter should be ushed on the table to check for the aspirated clots.
12.5.1 Stentriever Technique
(i) A 6F guide catheter is placed in the distal cervical inter-
nal carotid artery (ICA) or, in case of straight ICA, in the petrous or laceral segment. A microcatheter-micro guidewire combination is then navigated to the target vessel. A 0.021 microcatheter is used for most of the
stentrievers, and 0.017 microcatheter is used for distal vessels. The occlusion has to be crossed carefully and in blind, taking care to remember the normal anatomical disposition of the vessels.
(ii) After crossing the occlusion, the microguidewire is
exchanged for the stentriever which is deployed across the thrombus by gentle push while unsheathing of microcatheter at the same time (Fig.12.3).
(iii) After deployment, the stent is left in situ for a few min-
utes, usually 3–6min to allow for full expansion of the stent and better engagement of clot [12].
(iv) The next step is clot retrieval. The microcatheter is
slightly advanced up to the proximal end of the stent, and then the entire assembly is pulled out gently and swiftly. It is a good idea to do manual aspiration of guide catheter by an assistant using a 50ml syringe dur­ing the clot retrieval to avert re-embolization of clot fragments during the process. Some even prefer to pull out the guide catheter along with microcatheter-stent assembly.
(v) A control angiogram is then taken via the long sheath or
guide catheter (if not pulled out). Recanalization is assessed. If it is less than mTICI 2b, the procedure is repeated. If the recanalization is not satisfactory even after 3 or 4 passes, then switching over to another tech­nique or combination of one should be thought of. It shall be remembered that complication rate increases with prolonged procedure time and increased number of passes [13].

12.6 Combination Technique

(i) If one technique is not working, it is better to switch over
to another one or preferably a combination, i.e., aspira­tion + stentriever technique (also called Solumbra tech­nique). There can be multiple permutations and combinations of switch over methods [13].
(ii) One of the easier methods is to take the aspiration cath-
eter over a microcatheter-microguidewire assembly till the supraclinoid ICA. A longer microcatheter, avail­able with some vendors, is very convenient for the pur­pose. The microcatheter should be placed distally crossing the thrombus, and then the microguidewire is exchanged for a stentriever. The aspiration catheter is then tracked up to the level of the proximal aspect of the stent/thrombus, and the suction pump is switched on. The microcatheter is pulled out to allow for more space and better suction effect. After a few minutes of dwell time, the stentriver and aspiration catheter assem­bly is pulled out (Fig.12.4).
12 Endovascular Treatment ofAcute Stroke
125

12.7 Balloon Guide Catheters (BGC)

Proponents claim that it augments clot suction by the aspira­tion catheter and helps avoid distal non-target embolization [14]. Counter argument is that ow arrest does not help suc­tion effect and in fact impedes clot engagement and retrieval. BGC is placed in the cervical ICA and remains out of the angiographic led of attention most of the time. Hence, one needs to be mindful about its positioning and its ination­deation as errors can lead to cervical artery dissection. It adds up another step to an already demanding procedure.

12.8 Special Situations

12.8.1 Posterior Circulation Stroke
Though the techniques described above are for MCA occlu­sion, the same techniques with some appropriate intuitive modications can be applied to the posterior circulation and anterior cerebral artery occlusion. Some points of relevance for posterior circulation are listed as follows:
(i) MRI is more frequently needed for decision-making. (ii) MRI (DWI)-based pc-ASPECTS score can help assess
severity and predict functional outcome [15].
(iii) Longer time window even beyond 24h is allowed in
some cases.
(iv) Smaller caliber of vertebral arteries may preclude tri-
axial guiding system, and a simple 6F guide catheter and stentriever may work in many cases.
(ii) If the bridging IV thrombolysis is administered to the
patient, dual antiplatelets cannot be started immedi­ately after stenting. Single antiplatelet alone can be started for 24–48h following which a second one can be added.
12.8.3 Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease (ICAD)
ICAD as a cause of acute stroke is often a retrospective diag­nosis made after the rst or rst few passes when the residual lumen shows irregularity characteristic of a ruptured athero­sclerotic plaque or recurrent occlusions in a few minutes after each thrombectomy pass. Management options include thrombectomy followed by intracranial stent deployment across the culprit lesion or starting antiplatelet infusion (Abciximab or tiroban) immediately. Successful manage­ment with intracranial stent deployment are increasingly reported in recent times.
12.8.4 Medium Vessel Occlusions (MeVO)
Smaller caliber aspiration catheters and stentrievers are available for recanalizing medium vessel occlusions like dis­tal M2/M3 MCA, A2/A3 ACA, or P2/P3 PCA. Clot frag­mentation and migration to distal vessels during MT in LVOs are not uncommon, and these devices may be of much use in such situations.
12.8.2 Tandem Occlusions
(i) In concomitant neck vessel (ICA and vertebral artery)
and intracranial occlusions, both needs to be treated. Approaches may differ as to which one to treat rst. Ballon angioplasty of the stenosis at the neck vessel may be followed by intracranial thrombectomy; nally, the neck vessel lesion may be stented or left with bal­loon angioplasty alone [15]. Once stenting is done, patient has to be kept on antiplatelet agents to prevent stent thrombosis. Intravenous tiroban infusion is administered until the loading doses of oral antiplatelet agents are given. However, in case reperfusion hemor­rhage develops, antiplatelet agents will have to be stopped, increasing the risk of stent thrombosis and re­occlusion. Therefore, stenting is done only as a last resort in case of immediate recoil after angioplasty or in dissection.

12.9 Complications

Mechanical thrombectomy is associated with a number of intra and post-procedural complications, with an estimated rate of around 15% [16]. Some of these complications are life threatening. Many others are associated with increased in-hospital stay, higher cost, and increased disability. Some of the complications can be as follows:
(i) Failure to recanalize optimally: Many factors like dif-
cult anatomy, clot characteristics like excessive clot burden, “hard” clot, device failure, non-availability of multiple devices (including cost constraints), and unex­pected procedural delays can contribute to failed or inadequate recanalization (<TICI 2b).
(ii) Distal non-target or new territory embolization: It can
be harmful if a larger territory is involved when attempts should be made to recanalize the freshly occluded vessel.
126
L. J. D. Sebastian and S. Jain
(iii) Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): It is a potentially seri-
ous complication of MT associated with increase in morbidity and mortality. It can vary from small pete­chial or punctate hemorrhages to large hematoma. Those associated with neurologic deterioration with at least four points increase in NIHSS are dened as symptomatic ones (sICH).
(iv) Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): Arterial perforations
by wires or other devices lead to SAH.Minor SAH may not affect overall outcome. Angiographically visible extravasation should be managed instantly by measures like lowering the blood pressure, balloon tamponade, and temporary coiling if warranted.
(v) Other device-related events: Vasospasm sometimes fol-
lows clot retrieval due to vessel hyperresponsiveness to device manipulations and can potentially lead to re­occlusion. Intra-arterial milrinone or nimodipine are helpful in relieving vasospasm. Procedure-related arte­rial dissections can affect intra or extra-cranial arteries and should be recognized early and managed appropri­ately. A common site is the clinoidal segment of ICA where forcing an aspiration catheter along the acute curve of anterior genu of cavernous ICA can result in arterial injury. Accidental stent detachment can also happen. Decision to retrieve or leave the stent in situ should be taken after careful analysis of angiography for disposition of stent and ow impediments.
(vi) Malignant infarction: It can occur in up to 10% of
patients. Poor neurological status (high NIHSS) follow­ing MT, low baseline ASPECTS, and poor glycemic control are some of the clinical factors associated with malignant infarction. Decompressive craniectomy is indicated in many of these cases [17].

12.10 Immediate Post-procedure Care

The blood pressure should be lowered after successful recan­alization to reduce the chances of reperfusion hemorrhage. However, many studies suggest that intensive blood pressure control is associated with poor outcome, and hence mild-to­moderate reduction in systolic BP should sufce [18, 19].
Post-procedure CT scan is a must to look for bleed and infarct growth. Dual-energy CT if available will be very helpful to differentiate reperfusion bleed and contrast extravasation.
In patients done under GA, the decision of immediate or delayed extubation is taken based on the overall patient sta­tus, recanalization status, and ndings in the post-procedure CT scan.
In any case, it is highly desirable to monitor the patient in an intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU).
Close monitoring of GCS, blood pressure, blood sugar, and electrolytes is of paramount importance for bringing out a better clinical outcome. Follow-up CT scan at 24h is neces­sary. Further serial scans may be mandated to monitor an ICH. Sometimes, DWI may be done to assess infarct vol­ume. Serial NIHSS recording is a useful way of clinical monitoring.

References

1. Malhotra K, Gornbein J, Saver JL.Ischemic strokes due to large­vessel occlusions contribute disproportionately to stroke-related dependence and death: a review. Front Neurol. 2017;8:651. https://
doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00651.
2. Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1009–18. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1414792.
3. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, etal. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414905.
4. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, etal. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415061.
5. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, etal. A randomized trial of Intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411587.
6. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2296–306. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1503780.
7. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e46– e110. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.
8. Nael K, Sakai Y, Khatri P, Prestigiacomo CJ, Puig J, Vagal A. Imaging-based selection for endovascular treatment in stroke. Radiographics. 2019;39(6):1696–713. https://doi.org/10.1148/
rg.2019190030.
9. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, etal. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):708–18. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713973.
10. Pfaff JAR, Schönenberger S, Nagel S, et al. Effect of general anesthesia versus conscious sedation for stroke thrombectomy on angiographic workow in a randomized trial: a post hoc analysis of the SIESTA trial. Radiology. 2018;286(3):1016–21. https://doi.
org/10.1148/radiol.2017171002.
11. Ell M, etal. Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechani­cal thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2023;3:4. https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.122.000758.
12. Kannath SK, Rajan JE, Sylaja PN, etal. Dwell time of Stentriever inuences complete revascularization and rst-pass TICI 3 revascu­larization in acute large vessel occlusive stroke. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:169–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.155.
13. Pampana E, Fabiano S, De Rubeis G, etal. Switch strategy from direct aspiration rst pass technique to Solumbra improves technical outcome in Endovascularly treated stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052670.
14. Pederson JM, Reierson NL, Hardy N, et al. Comparison of bal­loon guide catheters and standard guide catheters for acute isch-
12 Endovascular Treatment ofAcute Stroke
127
emic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021;154:144–153.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
wneu.2021.07.034.
15. Rangel-Castilla L, Rajah GB, Shakir HJ, et al. Management of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: should endovascu­lar recanalization of the extracranial or intracranial occlusive lesion be done rst? Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(4):E16. https://doi.org/10
.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16500.
16. Balami JS, White PM, McMeekin PJ, Ford GA, Buchan AM. Complications of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: prevention and management. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(4):348–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743051.
17. Kumar GGS, Nagesh C.Acute ischemic stroke: a review of imaging, patient selection, and management in the endovascular era. Part II:
patient selection, endovascular thrombectomy, and postprocedure management. J Clin Interv Radiol ISVIR. 2018;02(03):169–83.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 0038- 1675882.
18. Nam HS, Kim YD, Heo J, etal. Intensive vs conventional blood pressure lowering after endovascular Thrombectomy in acute isch­emic stroke: the OPTIMAL-BP randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(9):832–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.14590.
19. Morris NA, Jindal G, Chaturvedi S. Intensive blood pressure control after mechanical Thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2023;54(5):1457–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/
STROKEAHA.122.041949.
Interventions inIntracranial andSpinal Arteriovenous Malformations
LeveJosephDevarajanSebastian, NikhilaGunnaReddy, andSavyasachiJain
13
Key Messages
1. Proper understanding of pathology, angioarchitecture, natu­ral history, varied clinical presentations of cerebral AVMs, and knowledge of various treatment options are essential for making optimal therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.
2. Cross-sectional imaging is invaluable to precisely local­izing brain AVM and thereby deciding the management.
3. Endovascular treatment remains the mainstay of manage­ment for dural AVF.
4. Spinal vascular malformations are uncommon and com­plex as well as often difcult to diagnose and treat.

13.1 Introduction

Intracranial AVMs can be classied, primarily based on their compartmentalization, into the following types:
1. Brain/cerebral parenchymal/pial AVMs.
2. Vein of Galen aneurysmal malformation.
3. Dural AV malformations and stulas.
Spinal AVMs will be dealt with in the last section of this
chapter.

13.2 Brain AVMs

13.2.1 Introduction
Brain vascular malformations consist of the following spec­trum of vascular lesions [1]:
1. Capillary telangiectasias.
2. Cavernous malformations (also called as cavernomas).
3. Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs).
4. Mixed lesions (cavernoma + DVA).
5. Arterio-venous malformations (AVMs).
Of these, AVMs are distinguished from the other types by the presence of abnormal arteriovenous shunting and a higher propensity to bleed. The majority of the symptom­atic cerebral AVMs need to be treated, and microneurosur­gical removal, endovascular embolization, and radiosurgical obliteration are the principal therapeutic modalities employed alone or in various combinations for the purpose. Proper understanding of pathology, angioar­chitecture, natural history, varied clinical presentations of cerebral AVMs, and knowledge of various treatment options are essential for making optimal therapeutic deci­sions in clinical practice. The following subsections intend to address the same.
13.2.2 Epidemiology
The prevalence of cerebral AVM is not denitely known, but their incidence in general autopsy is 0.15%, and it has been estimated that 0.14% and 0.8% of the population may pres­ent with a cerebral AVM in a given year [1, 2]. The annual risk of hemorrhage in an unruptured AVM is 2% yearly, and the risk of re-rupture in the rst year is >9% [3, 4].
Most of the lesions, in the sense of causative or primary trigger events, are congenital rather than acquired. In some syndromes like Rendu-Osler-Weber and Wyburn-Mason syndrome, multiple brain AVMs are seen. Various postulated theories state that there is a congenital predisposition that is triggered later in life by extrinsic/environmental factors [2,
5]. Rhoton et al. found that repressed preproendothelin-1
gene, increased VEGF, and increased angiopoietin receptors were noted in most cases of brain AVMs.
L. J. D. Sebastian (*) · N. G. Reddy · S. Jain Department of Neuro-radiology and Neurointerventions, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 S. H. Chandrashekhara (ed.), Textbook of Interventional Radiology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9601-4_13
129