Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
56
R. K. Patel et al.
Fig. 7.3 Post-whipple GI bleeding from PsA at PHA bifurcation managed with detachable coil packing of sac. (a) CHA angiogram shows a saccular PsA at hepatic artery bifurcation; (b) microcatheter was advanced into the PsA sac, followed by sac packing using two 8mm IDC coils (Boston Scientic); (d) post-coiling angiogram shows exclusion of PsA with patent hepatic artery. Stent graft placement was not feasible due to tortuous anatomy, and parent artery occlusion was not a choice in view of hepatic ischemia. PsA pseudoaneurysm, PHA proper hepatic artery, CHA common hepatic artery, IDC interlock detachable coil
a
c
b
d
most suitable for a saccular aneurysm with a narrow neck. The narrow neck of the aneurysm prevents the inadvertent migration of embolic materials into the parent artery. Coils or liquid embolic agents are most commonly used for this approach. Precise measurement of three-dimensional aneu­rysm size and intraprocedural calculation of packing den­sity is essential to ensure adequate coil packing. A tight coil packing with a density of >24% is required to avoid late coil compaction or recanalization. Large and wide-neck aneurysms may need additional neck remodeling tech­niques [18].
If possible, the sac packing technique should be avoided for pseudoaneurysms. Due to the lack of the three-layered arterial wall in pseudoaneurysms, sac packing may lead to aneurysmal expansion and increase the risk of rupture. However, when no other option is available, and parent artery patency is desired, sac packing using detachable coils may be considered as a salvage measure to control bleeding (Fig.7.3) [19].
Stent or Balloon-Assisted Coiling [20, 21]
Stent or balloon-assisted coiling is considered in large and wide-neck aneurysms arising from a non-expandable artery, and a covered stent cannot be placed. In the stent-assisted
coiling technique, an uncovered stent is placed across the neck of the aneurysm. The aneurysmal sac is packed with coils via a microcatheter introduced through the stent mesh. The stent provides a scaffold that prevents the prolapse of the coil into the parent artery during coil packing.
In the balloon-assisted technique, after gaining access into the aneurysmal sac through a microcatheter, a non­detachable balloon is temporarily inated across the neck of the aneurysm during coil packing or liquid embolic adminis­tration. Once the embolic cast is formed within the aneurysm and the aneurysm is thrombosed, the balloon is deated and removed; with an end result of exclusion of the aneurysm but a patent parent artery. In bifurcation aneurysms, technical modications are required, necessitating the ination of more than one balloon at a time. These assisted techniques increase the procedural cost. Furthermore, in the case of stent-assisted coiling, long-term antiplatelet therapy is often recommended.
Multi-Layered Flow-Diverting Stents [22]
Flow diverters are most commonly used in treating intra­cranial aneurysms, especially for large and wide-neck aneurysms that are otherwise not amenable to standard endovascular techniques. The ow-diverter modulates the
7 Embolization inInterventional Radiology
57
blood ow away from the aneurysmal sac while maintain­ing ow through the normal vessels, thereby enhancing thrombus formation within the aneurysmal sac. Besides limited clinical experience, their high cost of ow-diverters makes them less favorable for extracranial aneurysms. Further, its use in pseudoaneurysms is limited, as thrombo­sis occurs slowly, and there is a possibility of rupture in the interim.
7.6.1.2 Parent Artery Occlusion
Sandwich Technique [1922]
This is one of the most commonly used techniques for embo­lizing visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs), with a clinical suc­cess rate of >90%. The parent artery must be expandable to use this technique. In this technique, the parent artery is occluded both proximal and distal to the aneurysmal neck to avoid retrograde aneurysm lling from the collaterals. The efferent artery or backdoor is closed rst, followed by the afferent artery or backdoor (Fig. 7.4). Coil and vascular plugs are the most commonly used embolic agents for this approach. However, it precludes repeat transarterial emboli­zation in the future if re-bleeding occurs or bleeding occurs from an artery distal to the embolized artery.
Only Proximal Inow Embolization [16, 17, 23]
This technique refers to the proximal embolization of the feeding artery. It is used for end arteries (e.g., renal artery) and distal lesions in the intraparenchymal vessels (e.g., intra­parenchymal distal splenic artery pseudoaneurysm). Embolization should be performed as selectively as possible to limit the area of infarct (Fig.7.5).
7.6.1.3 Percutaneous Approach [16, 17, 24, 25]
A percutaneous approach is considered in case of a failed endovascular approach or an aneurysm that is inaccessible endovascularly. The aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm must be accessible under USG or CT guidance. A pseudoaneurysm should be surrounded by a solid organ or considerable peripheral thrombus rim to avoid the risk of aneurysmal rup­ture during the percutaneous approach. The aneurysmal sac is punctured using a 22G lumbar puncture (LP) or Chiba needle, keeping the tip away from the aneurysmal neck to avoid non-target embolization (Fig.7.6). Then, the emboliz­ing agent is slowly administered under guidance until throm­bosis of the sac occurs. Thrombin, glue, and occasionally coils are used as embolic agents. At times, the balloon­assisted embolization technique is combined with a percuta­neous approach, especially when there is a relatively high risk of non-target embolization. A balloon is placed across the neck via an endovascular approach, the aneurysm is accessed, and the embolic agent is injected via a direct per­cutaneous approach under CT or USG guidance (Fig.7.7).
Despite a higher risk of complications, certain situations require glue embolization. The indications include the inabil­ity to reach the target site due to unfavorable vascular anat­omy, re-lling pseudoaneurysm following coil embolization, and in patients with coagulopathy when coil or vascular plug alone may not sufce. The operator must be aware of ow dynamics and essential vascular anatomy to decide the glue concentration, amount, and injection rate to avoid non-target embolization [16, 17]. Newer liquid embolics, such as Onyx, Squid, and PHIL, provide superior control than glue; hence, these are favored over glue in critical locations, e.g., neuro­intervention [15].
a
Fig. 7.4 Sandwich technique for SMA pseudoaneurysm coiling. (a) DSA shows a saccular PsA (dotted white circle) arising from the proxi­mal right colic artery; (b, c) Embolization was performed using two microcoils placed across the PsA neck (black arrows b, c), occluding
b
c
both the front and backdoor of PsA (also known as sandwich tech­nique). Post-embolization DSA shows exclusion of PsA with lling of distal colic branches. SMA=superior mesenteric artery, DSA digital subtraction angiography, PsA pseudoaneurysm
58
a
R. K. Patel et al.
Fig. 7.5 Post-PCNL renal artery pseudoaneurysm treated with coil embolization. (a) NCCT showing a perinephric hematoma; (b) CTA demonstrates a right renal artery pseudoaneurysm (black arrow b); (c) right renal angiogram conrmed a pseudoaneurysm, arising from the lower polar artery (black arrow c), which was super selectively embolized with a 4mm microcoil; (d) post-coiling angiogram reveals no lling of PsA with the normal arterial ow to the rest of the right kidney. PCNL percutaneous nephrolithotomy, NCCT non-contrast CT, CTA CT angiography, PsA pseudoaneurysm
b
c
d
7.6.2 Tumoral Embolization
cone-beam CT (CBCT) makes tumoral embolization easy. It provides detailed vascular anatomy and helps target the
Tumoral embolization is used for tumor devascularization intended to provide palliative in terms of pain reduction, decrease in tumor size, and control or prevention of hem­orrhage. Preoperative embolization is also done in case of hypervascular tumors (e.g., renal cell carcinoma, renal angiomyolipoma, juvenile nasopharyngeal angiobroma, carotid body tumor, and soft tissue hemangioma) to reduce operative blood loss (Fig.7.8). Commonly used embolic agents include gelfoam slurry, PVA particles, or glue/onyx [26, 27]. Chemotherapeutic drugs can be mixed with a carrier (lipiodol or drug-eluting bead) to perform intratumoral chemotherapy, called chemoembolization (e.g., TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma) (Fig. 7.9). Similarly, radioactive particle-labelled microspheres are used for intratumoral radiotherapy, known as radioembo­lization or selective internal radiation therapy (TARE/ SIRT) [2830].
A pre-procedural CT helps identify relevant vascular anatomy and feeder vessels, reducing procedural time and radiation exposure. Whenever available, intraprocedural
appropriate feeder arteries. It also helps in deciding the end point of embolization [31].
Preoperative embolization of head and neck tumors needs special mention owing to their locations in the vicinity of different vital structures, and the presence of multiple impor­tant intra-extracranial vascular anastomoses may complicate the embolization procedure. The transarterial route is rou­tinely used for embolization. However, percutaneous direct puncture techniques using liquid embolic agents have also been reported. Selective catheterization of external and inter­nal carotid artery branches is required to delineate the tumoral feeders adequately. Further, a selective DSA run
may show the important ECA-ICA anastomoses and ocular supply for which care should be taken during the emboliza­tion [2628].
The commonly used embolic agents for this purpose are particulate and liquid embolic agents. Particle size should not be very small (usually <150μm) because smaller parti­cles may lead to non-target penetration into vasa vasorum, resulting in cranial nerve palsies or entering the intracranial
7 Embolization inInterventional Radiology
59
Fig. 7.6 Percutaneous USG-guided glue embolization of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm following hysterectomy. (a) USG Doppler shows a well-dened pseudoaneurysm at the vaginal vault with ying-yang sign within (open white arrow a); (b, c) axial and coronal CECT images conrmed the pseudoaneurysm arising from left uterine artery stump (thick yellow arrow c); (d) under USG guidance, pseudoaneurysm was accessed by a 22G Chiba needle (thin white arrow d) through percutaneous puncture and was embolized using a 30% glue-lipiodol mixture (open black arrow d). USG ultrasound, CECT contrast-enhanced CT
a
c
b
d
circulation, causing focal neurological decits. To maximize the benets of the embolization procedure, the surgical resection should be carried out 1–8days after the emboliza­tion [26, 32].
7.6.3 AVM Embolization
The embolization of arteriovenous malformation (AVM) requires obliteration of nidus and venous outow to avoid recurrence while minimizing non-target embolization. This can be best achieved by slowing the ow to improve operator control and intra- or juxtanidal positioning of the catheter. Nidus is accessed antegradely through arterial, retrogradely through venous approach, or direct puncture, depending upon the types of AVM. Further, ow reduction can be achieved through balloon occlusion or plugging of inow artery/outow vein using coil, glue, vascular plug, or a com­bination of these (Fig.7.10). In supercial locations, a blood pressure cuff or manual compression of veins may sufce for ow reduction. One must be aware of the risk of non-target reux of embolic agents into the arterial system while using complete outow vein occlusion [33].
In AVM with multiple outow veins, procedural modi-
cation such as “cookie cutter technique” may be required for
simultaneous occlusion of multiple venous ow while embo­lizing the nidus or venous sac through direct percutaneous injection of liquid embolic agents [34].
In complex high-ow AVM, particularly in the brain, the “pressure cooker technique (PCT)” is a modication to avoid reux and enable a relatively forceful and contiguous injec­tion of liquid embolic (most commonly Onyx) for complete embolization. The PCT consists of creating a plug of coils and glue between the tip and the detachment zone of a previ­ously placed DMSO-compatible microcatheter. Although less common, this PCT may also be used through the venous approach [35, 36].
7.6.4 Embolization inTrauma [37, 38]
Organ with dual blood supply or extensive collateral circula­tion (e.g., liver, Upper GI tract) tolerates a relatively larger area of embolization. Vessels in patients with trauma tend to spasm frequently, and hence, vascular spasm must be consid­ered while planning for embolization. In case of massive bleeding with multiple areas of contrast, extravasation neces­sitates non-selective embolization using gelfoam (e.g., mul­tiple sites of bleeding from pelvic vessels or liver). When the patient is relatively stable, superselective embolization
60
R. K. Patel et al.
a
c
d
b
e
Fig. 7.7 Balloon-assisted percutaneous thrombin injection for a large femoral artery pseudoaneurysm. (a) USG shows a large PsA with a jet of ow arising from SFA; (b) DSA conrmed the USG ndings, show­ing a large PsA (open white arrow b); (c) a 6-mm balloon (yellow arrow c) was inated across the neck of the PsA, followed by percutaneous
should be considered to prevent non-target tissue ischemia or necrosis. Of note, end-arterial organ embolization must be performed superselectively to minimize non-target tissue ischemia (e.g., kidney).
7.6.5 Special Scenario
7.6.5.1 Provocative Angiography
In some cases, provocative angiography may improve the diagnostic yield when invasive angiography remains nega­tive despite a very high degree of clinical suspicion (e.g., ongoing GI bleeding with negative angiogram). To identify the site of bleeding, bleeding is induced using systemic hep­arinization and selective injection of a vasodilator with a thrombolytic. However, the safety of this approach is contro­versial and should only be considered in patients with repeated negative angiographies [39].
thrombin injection under USG guidance (open white arrow d), resulted in thrombus formation (open red arrow d) without any distal spillage of thrombin; (e) post-thrombin injection DSA reveals exclusion of PsA. PsA pseudoaneurysm, S FA supercial femoral artery, DSA digital sub­traction angiography
Despite active bleeding, the arterial injury site may be obscured due to the tamponade effect by an adjacent indwell­ing catheter (e.g., hemobilia from arterio-biliary stula after PTBD placement). In such cases, a repeat catheter angiogra­phy following removal of the catheter (over a guidewire) can unmask the arterial injury site, and then embolization can be performed [40].
7.6.5.2 Lower GI Bleeding
While the upper GI tract has extensive arterial collateraliza­tion, the GI tract beyond the ligament of Trietz has poor col­lateralization. This raises a concern for bowel ischemia if embolization is not very accurate at the bleeding site with the occurrence of non-target embolization [41]. The goal is to embolize superselectively at the level of the vasa recta and avoid the marginal artery. Detachable coils are most com­monly used. Particles and glue are less preferred due to their increased risk of bowel infarction [42, 43].
7 Embolization inInterventional Radiology
61
Fig. 7.8 Pre-operative JNA embolization. (a) CTA showing a right-sided hypervascular mass in the nasopharynx; (b, c) DSA images show multiple feeders from right ECA (open black arrow); (d) post-PVA (350–500 microns) embolization DSA shows disappearance of tumoral blush. JNA juvenile nasopharyngeal angiobroma,
ECA external carotid artery, DSA digital subtraction
angiography
a
c
b
d
7.6.5.3 Hepatic Artery Aneurysm
To minimize the risk of hepatic ischemia, portal vein patency should be conrmed before extensive intrahepatic arterial embolization or proper hepatic artery embolization is planned. A common hepatic artery aneurysm or pseudoaneu­rysm is best treated using a stent graft or stent/balloon­assisted coiling [17]. Of note, the hepatic artery is the only
source of blood supply to the biliary tree in the transplanted liver. Hence, an artery preservation strategy must be adopted to avoid the risk of biliary necrosis and abscess formation.
Stent grafting, or stent/balloon-assisted aneurysmal coiling, is the treatment of choice for aneurysms arising from the common hepatic artery [16].
7.6.5.4 Renal Artery Aneurysm (RAA)
The renal artery is an end artery, and proximal embolization leads to distal tissue ischemia. Therefore, the embolization strategy in renal vasculature aims to preserve parent artery ow with the exclusion of pathology or at least to embolize
as superselectively as possible to limit the extent of distal tissue ischemia. Aneurysm in the main renal artery necessi-
tates stent graft placement with a landing zone of 15mm, while aneurysm arising from extra-renal proximal arterial bifurcation is treated by stent or coil-assisted coil or onyx embolization. RAA from the distal renal artery is managed
with just-aneurysmal proximal coil embolization [21, 23].
7.6.5.5 Percutaneous Transhepatic or Transplenic
Access forEmbolization
Portal vein embolization requires either percutaneous tran­shepatic or transplenic access. Variceal or large portosys­temic shunt embolization may also require a transhepatic or transplenic route. An intraparenchymal vein is punctured using a 21 or 22G Chiba needle under USG guidance, fol­lowed by the insertion of a vascular sheath. After emboliza­tion is completed, the percutaneous access tract is embolized using a combination of coil and glue to avoid the risk of intraperitoneal hemorrhage (Fig.7.11) [44, 45].
62
R. K. Patel et al.
Fig. 7.9 TACE for HCC. (a) Arterial phase CT reveals a well-dened hypervascular HCC; (b) hepatic artery angiogram shows tumoral blush (yellow arrow b). Initially, a mixture of epirubicin and lipiodol was injected, followed by embolization of feeder arteries by gelfoam slurry. (c) Post-TACE angiogram shows disappearance of tumor blush; (d) follow-up CT after 1day demonstrates lipiodol cast (black arrow d) within the HCC. TACE transarterial chemoembolization, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma
a
c
b
d
a
c
d
b
e
Fig. 7.10 Uterine AVM embolization using balloon-occluded arterial inow control. (a) Axial CTA and (b) VRT images show large uterine AVM (red arrows), supplied by bilateral uterine arteries with early draining right iliac vein; (c) right internal iliac DSA demonstrates the AVM (open red arrow c). Due to very high ow, the arterial inow was
initially slowed using an 8-mm balloon inated in the right internal iliac artery (white arrow b), followed by embolization of nidus through a microcatheter (thin black arrow d) using a 40% glue-lipiodol mixture (open black arrows in d showing glue cast). CTA CT angiography, AVM arteriovenous malformation, DSA digital subtraction angiography
7 Embolization inInterventional Radiology
63
Fig. 7.11 Transplenic gastric variceal embolization for bleeding in a patient with sinistral portal HTN. (a) Coronal MIP CT image shows multiple varices along the gastric wall (white arrows a) with thrombosed splenic vein; (b) splenic venogram through a transplenic access reveals multiple varices (black arrow b), supplied by short gastric vein (yellow arrow b). Glue embolization was done. (c) Post-embolization venogram showed obliteration of the varices with glue case (open white arrows c, d). In the end, transplenic route was embolized using 50% glue-lipiodol solution (red arrow d)
a
c
b
d

7.7 Newer Embolizations

7.7.1 Genicular Artery Embolization
Osteoarthritis of the knee is the leading cause of chronic pain and disability in older people. Traditionally, OA knee is man­aged stepwise, ranging from conservative management and medical therapy for mild to moderate OA knee to arthro­plasty for the severe grade of disease. Angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in its pathogenesis by fueling chronic inamma­tion and perpetuating degenerative joint changes [46]. In a minimally invasive manner, genicular artery embolization (GAE) selectively embolizes the geniculate branches corre­sponding to the site of pain, inhibiting the vicious cycle of inammation and pain generation [46, 47].
GAE improves joint pain, function, and quality of life with a durable response ranging from 6 to 24 months. Importantly, GAE is best served as an effective adjunct ther­apy that can reduce the use of other conservative therapies (NSAIDs, opioids, and joint injections) and delay or prevent surgical intervention [4648].
A clear understanding of the knee’s structural and genicu­lar artery anatomy is crucial to perform embolization safely and effectively. After vascular access, a superselective angio­graphic run of each genicular artery is taken using a micro­catheter to identify the synovial blush, and an embolic agent is delivered until the synovial blush has disappeared. As the medial compartment is commonly affected in OA knee,
branches of medial and descending genicular arteries are the most common embolization targets. Usually, 2–3 vessels with pathological synovial blush per knee are embolized, leaving some arteries to preserve blood supply to the joint capsule [47]. GAE has a >80% technical success rate. GAE is also used to treat recurrent hemarthrosis [47, 49, 50].
Permanent particulate agents are used as embolic mate­rial. Different embolic agents used for GAE are Embozene microspheres (75–100 μm), Embospheres (Merit medical systems; 100–300μm), and PVA (10–70μm). Imipenem and cilastatin have also been used for successful embolization [46]. To minimize non-target embolization to cutaneous branches, an ice pack around the joint should be placed to cause vasospasm and prevent the migration of embolic mate­rials to the skin [50].
7.7.2 Other Transarterial Embolization (TAE)
forChronic Musculoskeletal Pain
The usage of therapeutic transarterial embolization (TAE) has also been extended to other pathologies attributing to chronic musculoskeletal pain, such as adhesive capsulitis in the shoulder joint, shoulder tendinopathy, lateral epicondyli­tis in the elbow, elbow tendinopathy, trapezius myalgia, enthesopathy, and plantar fasciitis. TAE is usually used as an adjunct therapy, particularly in patients with pain refractory to medical treatment [5155]. The concept behind TAE is the
64
R. K. Patel et al.
same as that of GAE, i.e., reducing the vascular blush due to neoangiogenesis, which slows down the vicious cycles of chronic inammation and pain generation. Adequate vascu­lar and structural anatomy knowledge is paramount for suc­cessful embolization without complications [51, 54].
7.7.3 Bariatric Artery Embolization (BAE) forObese Patients
Obesity is a major public health issue, predisposing to mul­tiple diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascu­lar disease, and cancer. Benets from rst-line therapies, including nutritional modication, exercise, and pharmaco­therapy, are often temporary and non-sustainable. Despite the most effective method, bariatric surgery is limited by its invasive nature, high price, and signicant rate of post­operative morbidity and mortality. Recently, the endovascu­lar technique of bariatric artery embolization (BAE) has been studied as an obesity and overweight treatment with promising results [56, 57].
It is worth mentioning that BAE is not a replacement for bariatric surgery but a complementary to facilitate weight loss with lifestyle modication. Thus, BAE could serve as a bridge or a complementary therapy to bariatric surgery [57].
Extrapolating from the hormonal mechanism of weight loss in bariatric surgery, BAE aims to reduce the production of Grehelin, an orexigenic hormone most commonly pro­duced in the gastric fundus. There is no universal recommen­dation regarding the ideal candidate for BAE.However, two of the largest trials, i.e., GET-LEAN and BEAT obesity trial, included patients of BMI>40kg/m2 for BAE [5759].
In BAE, selective embolization of the gastric fundus is performed using particulate embolic materials. Superselective catheterization of the left gastric artery (LGA) and/or gastro­epiploic artery (GEA) is done, followed by injection of par­ticulate embolic agents (PVA or Embospheres of 300–500μm). This procedure is relatively safe without any signicant adverse events [57, 58].
Available studies have shown a consistent average weight loss of 8–9% (ranging from 4.8% to 17.2%) following BAE at 1year. BAE has also shown to improve hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, and HDL-lipoprotein levels [5759]. Further studies with a larger number of participants are required to establish its role in managing obesity.

7.8 Conclusion

An immense growth in the eld of embolotherapy has been noticed in the last two decades. The technologies in embolo­therapy will continue to evolve toward a more precise and controlled delivery of embolic agents. The role of embolo-
therapy is expanding in a variety of clinical scenarios. Therefore, a detailed knowledge and understanding of the basic principles and techniques in embolization will facili­tate more procedural success and clinical outcomes.

References

1. Dariushnia SR, Redstone EA, Heran MKS, Cramer HR Jr, Ganguli S, Gomes AS, Hogan MJ, Himes EA, Patel S, Schiro BJ, Lewis CA. Society of Interventional Radiology Quality Improvement Standards for percutaneous Transcatheter emboliza­tion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(3):476.e1–476.e33. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.10.022. PMID: 33640083.
2. Angle JF, Siddiqi NH, Wallace MJ, Kundu S, Stokes L, Wojak JC, Cardella JF, Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for per­cutaneous transcatheter embolization: Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(10):1479–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2010.06.014. PMID: 20870162.
3. Rilling WS, Chen GW.Preoperative embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004;21(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 2004- 831400. PMID: 21331104; PMCID: PMC3036207.
4. Meher R, Kathuria S, Wadhwa V, Ali MR, Shah B, Bansal A, Goel P. Preoperative emobilisation of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiobroma. Am J Otolaryngol. 2022;43(5):103532. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103532. Epub 2022 Jun 11. PMID:
35714497.
5. Kolkailah AA, Alreshq RS, Muhammed AM, Zahran ME, Anas El-Wegoud M, Nabhan AF. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutane­ous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4(4):CD012318. https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD012318.pub2. PMID: 29665617;
PMCID: PMC6494633.
6. Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Anzuini A, Jolly SS, Bertrand OF, Krucoff MW, Windecker S, Valgimigli M.Radial versus femoral access for coronary interven­tions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery dis­ease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(14):1419–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Jun 29. PMID: 27372195.
7. Mauro MA, Murphy KP, Thomson KR, Venbrux AC, Morgan RA. Image-guided interventions: expert radiology series. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2013.
8. Murray TÉ, Brennan P, Maingard JT, Chandra RV, Little DM, Brooks DM, Kok HK, Asadi H, Lee MJ. Treatment of visceral artery aneurysms using novel neurointerventional devices and techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(9):1407–17. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.733. Epub 2019 Apr 26. PMID:
31036460.
9. Das JP, Asadi H, Kok HK, Phelan E, O’Hare A, Lee MJ.Balloon­assisted coil embolization (BACE) of a wide-necked renal artery aneurysm using the intracranial scepter C compliant occlu­sion balloon catheter. CVIR Endovasc. 2018;1(1):12. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s42155- 018- 0018- 0. Epub 2018 Oct 3. PMID:
30652144; PMCID: PMC6319664.
10. Lubarsky M, Ray CE, Funaki B.Embolization agents-which one should be used when? Part 1: large-vessel embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009;26(4):352–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s- -
0029- 1242206. PMID: 21326545; PMCID: PMC3036462.
11. Lubarsky M, Ray C, Funaki B. Embolization agents-which one should be used when? Part 2: small-vessel embolization. Semin
7 Embolization inInterventional Radiology
65
Intervent Radiol. 2010;27(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s- -
0030- 1247891. PMID: 21359018; PMCID: PMC3036509.
12. Lopera JE. Embolization in trauma: principles and techniques. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010;27(1):14–28. https://doi.org/10.1055/
s- 0030- 1247885. PMID: 21359011; PMCID: PMC3036510.
13. Coldwell DM, Stokes KR, Yakes WF. Embolotherapy: agents, clinical applications, and techniques. Radiographics. 1994;14(3):623–43; quiz 645–6. https://doi.org/10.1148/
radiographics.14.3.8066276.
14. Vollherbst DF, Chapot R, Bendszus M, Möhlenbruch MA.Glue, onyx, squid or PHIL? Liquid embolic agents for the emboliza­tion of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and dural arterio­venous stulas. Clin Neuroradiol. 2022;32(1):25–38. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00062- 021- 01066- 6. Epub 2021 Jul 29. PMID:
34324005; PMCID: PMC8894162.
15. Pal A, Blanzy J, Gómez KJR, Preul MC, Vernon BL. Liquid embolic agents for endovascular embolization: a review. Gels. 2023;9(5):378. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9050378. PMID: 37232970; PMCID: PMC10217684.
16. Khairallah MK, Morgan RA, Das R.Technical considerations of endovascular management of true visceral artery aneurysms. CVIR Endovasc. 2023;6(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155- 023-
00368- 9. PMID: 37284993; PMCID: PMC10247946.
17. Madhusudhan KS, Venkatesh HA, Gamanagatti S, Garg P, Srivastava DN. Interventional radiology in the Management of Visceral Artery Pseudoaneurysms: A review of techniques and embolic materials. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(3):351–63. https://
doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.351. Epub 2016 Apr 14. PMID:
27134524; PMCID: PMC4842855.
18. Yasumoto T, Osuga K, Yamamoto H, Ono Y, Masada M, Mikami K, Kanamori D, Nakamura M, Tanaka K, Nakazawa T, Higashihara H, Maeda N, Tomiyama N.Long-term outcomes of coil packing for visceral aneurysms: correlation between packing density and inci­dence of coil compaction or recanalization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(12):1798–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 Jun 27. PMID: 23810652.
19. Loffroy R, Rao P, Ota S, De Lin M, Kwak BK, Krause D, Geschwind JF.Packing technique for endovascular coil embolisation of periph­eral arterial pseudo-aneurysms with preservation of the parent artery: safety, efcacy and outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(2):209–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.03.009. PMID: 20399122.
20. Cordova AC, Sumpio BE. Visceral artery aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms—should they all be managed by endovas­cular techniques? Ann. Vasc Dis. 2013;6(4):687–93. https://
doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.13- 00045. Epub 2013 Nov 15. PMID:
24386016; PMCID: PMC3866356.
21. Jesinger RA, Thoreson AA, Lamba R. Abdominal and pel­vic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: imaging review with clinical, radiologic, and treatment correlation. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):E71–96. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.333115036. PMID:
23674782.
22. Giorgianni A, Pellegrino C, Minotto R, Mercuri A, Baruzzi F, Cantoni A, Cardim LN, Valvassori L. Flow-diverter stenting in post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm of cavernous internal carotid artery with epistaxis. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(3):325–8. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1591019915582154. Epub 2015 May 26. PMID:
26015524; PMCID: PMC4757263.
23. Eldem G, Erdoğan E, Peynircioğlu B, Arat A, Balkancı F.Endovascular treatment of true renal artery aneurysms: a single center experience. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25(1):62–70. https://
doi.org/10.5152/dir.2018.17354. PMID: 30272561; PMCID:
PMC6339632.
24. Patel R, Tripathy TP, Debbarma R, Mohakud S, Mohanty S, Bag ND.Percutaneous thrombin injection with balloon protection for a large iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysm: a case report
with review of literature. Acta Med Litu. 2023;30(1):80–5. https://
doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2023.30.1.9. Epub 2023 May 16. PMID:
37575377; PMCID: PMC10417016.
25. Carriero S, Lanza C, Biondetti P, Renzulli M, Bonelli C, Piacentino F, Fontana F, Venturini M, Carraello G, Ierardi AM.Imaging-guided percutaneous puncture and embolization of visceral Pseudoaneurysms: feasibility and outcomes. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):2952. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11112952. PMID: 35683341; PMCID: PMC9181803.
26. Dufs EJ, Gandhi CD, Prestigiacomo CJ, Abruzzo T, Albuquerque F, Bulsara KR, Derdeyn CP, Fraser JF, Hirsch JA, Hussain MS, Do HM, Jayaraman MV, Meyers PM, Narayanan S, Society for Neurointerventional Surgery. Head, neck, and brain tumor emboli­zation guidelines. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4(4):251–5. https://doi.
org/10.1136/neurintsurg- 2012- 010350. Epub 2012 Apr 26. PMID:
22539531; PMCID: PMC3370378.
27. Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Pandey A, Gandhi D, Sullivan SE, Marentette LJ, Chepeha DB, Ansari SA.Usefulness of percutane­ously injected ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer in conjunction with standard endovascular embolization techniques for preop­erative devascularization of hypervascular head and neck tumors: technique, initial experience, and correlation with surgical obser­vations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(5):961–6. https://doi.
org/10.3174/ajnr.A1936. Epub 2009 Dec 24. PMID: 20037136;
PMCID: PMC7964177.
28. Lencioni R, Petruzzi P, Crocetti L.Chemoembolization of hepa­tocellular carcinoma. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013;30(1):3–11.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 0033- 1333648. PMID: 24436512;
PMCID: PMC3700789.
29. Kang YJ, Lee BC, Kim JK, Yim NY, Kim HO, Cho SB, Jeong YY. Conventional versus small doxorubicin-eluting bead Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treating Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00270- 019- 02349- 9. Epub 2019 Oct 23. PMID: 31646378.
30. Guiu B, Garin E, Allimant C, Edeline J, Salem R.TARE in hepato­cellular carcinoma: from the right to the left of BCLC.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022;45(11):1599–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00270- 022- 03072- 8. Epub 2022 Feb 11. PMID: 35149884.
31. Floridi C, Radaelli A, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Grass M, Lin M, Chiaradia M, Geschwind JF, Kobeiter H, Squillaci E, Maleux G, Giovagnoni A, Brunese L, Wood B, Carraello G, Rotondo A.C-arm cone- beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications. Radiol Med. 2014;119(7):521–32. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11547- 014- 0429- 5. Epub 2014 Jul 11. Erratum
in: Radiol Med. 2015 Apr;120(4):406. Grass, Micheal [corrected to Grass, Michael]; De Lin, Ming [corrected to Lin, MingDe]; Kobeiter, Hishman [corrected to Kobeiter, Hicham]. PMID: 25012472; PMCID: PMC4209965.
32. Lazzaro MA, Badruddin A, Zaidat OO, Darkhabani Z, Pandya DJ, Lynch JR. Endovascular embolization of head and neck tumors. Front Neurol. 2011;17(2):64. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fneur.2011.00064. PMID: 22022319; PMCID: PMC3195266.
33. Kim R, Do YS, Park KB. How to treat peripheral arteriovenous malformations. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22(4):568–76. https://doi.
org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0981. Epub 2020 Dec 21. PMID: 33543847;
PMCID: PMC8005356.
34. Duncan IC, Fourie PA. Circumferential ow reduction during percutaneous embolotherapy of extracranial vascular malforma­tions: the “cookie-cutter” technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(7):1453–5. PMID: 12917145; PMCID: PMC7973694.
35. Clarençon F, Stracke CP, Shotar E, Wallocha M, Mosimann PJ, Boch AL, Sourour N, Chapot R.Pressure cooker technique for endovascular treatment of spinal arteriovenous stulas: experience in 15 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42(7):1270–5. https://