Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
150
L. J. D. Sebastian et al.
a
c
d
Fig. 13.21 Spinal dural AVF embolization. A 56-year-old male pre­sented with insidious onset, gradually progressive, weakness, and tin­gling sensation in both lower limbs (power 4/5) with straining during micturition for last 3years. (a) Sagittal T2W MRI spine shows a long segment, T2 hyperintensity involving the cord from D9-D12 vertebral body levels, with ow voids over cord surface (D10–D12 vertebral body levels), without any contrast enhancement or hematomyelia. (b)
e
Diagnostic angiogram shows a dural AVF feeding from the radicular branch of right D8 segmental artery, draining into the perimedullary venous plexus. (c) Microcatheter angiogram into the radicular vessel conrmed the ndings. (d & e) 20% NBCA glue was injected to com­pletely obliterate the stula, which was conrmed on a check angio­gram. (f) Follow-up MRI after 2months revealed reduction in spinal cord signal changes with reduction in ow voids
fb
3. Dilute glue—15–25%, depending on the microcatheter position and ow—is the embolic agent of choice. Glue should reach the footplate and proximal segment (1–2cm) of the draining vein. Falling short of the venous footplate or excessive glue into the coronal plexus can leave persis­tent stula or precipitate excessive venous thrombosis, respectively.
13.5.4.2 SCAVS (Figs.13.22 and13.23)
Treatment is essentially endovascular. In SCAVF, treatment intent is curative (stula elimination and venous deconges­tion). For SCAVM, intent is stabilization and elimination of weak points. All feeder pedicles are identied, after which the larger and shorter one is used for superselective micro­catheter navigation and embolization. Glue is embolic agent of choice. Non-adhesive liquid embolics (like Onyx) are bet­ter avoided for spinal vascular embolizations.
13.5.4.3 Spinal Epidural AVMs
Treatment goal is inducing thrombosis and causing size reduction of large venous sacs in epidural/osteodural AVM/ AVFs. The most appropriate vessel, among the leash of ves­sels applying epidural AVM, is selected based on proximity to the venous sac, and the absence of radiculo-medullary supply from the same vascular pedicle is ensured. Dilute glue is injected such that it reaches the venous sacs. Even minimal amount of glue has the capacity to cause progres­sive thrombosis of the sac.
13.5.4.4 Metameric AVMs
They are difcult to treat. Among the intradural and osteo­dural components, epidural component is easier to treat. Cord component is better not touched, unless there are den­itive indications like hematomyelia.
13 Interventions inIntracranial andSpinal Arteriovenous Malformations
151
a
b
d
e
f
c
Fig. 13.22 Glomerular AVM.A 14-year-old boy presented with severe backache and sudden onset quadriparesis. (a) Sagittal T2W MRI reveals hematomyelia (arrow) with multiple intradural vascular ow voids along the anterior aspect of the spinal cord (arrowhead). (b) Diagnostic angiogram shows a glomerular type AVM in cervical region (black arrow), feeding from a branch (white arrow) of left vertebral artery and draining into the anterior spinal vein (arrowhead). (c) Selective micro-
catheter angiogram reveals the origin of anterior spinal artery from feeding branch. The AVM was embolized using NBCA, and control angiogram post-embolization (d) revealed no residual AVM. (e) The anterior spinal artery was seen reconstituted from radiculomedullary arteries at other cervico-dorsal levels. (f) Resolution of ow voids was seen in MRI after 3months
152
L. J. D. Sebastian et al.
a
b
ce
f
d
Fig. 13.23 Spinal cord AVF.A 1-year-old male child presented with spastic paraparesis. (a) Sagittal T2W MRI shows a large venous pouch (arrow), anterior-lateral to the spinal cord at lower dorsal level, possibly feeding from a branch of the segmental artery arising from the aorta and draining into a dilated anterior spinal vein superiorly (arrowhead). (b) Diagnostic angiogram reveals a spinal cord macro-stula (AVF) (black arrow) at the lower dorsal level, feeding from radiculomedullary artery

References

1. Valavanis A, Pangalu A, Tanaka M.Endovascular treatment of cere­bral arteriovenous malformations with emphasis on the curative role of embolisation. Interv Neuroradiol. 2005;11(Suppl 1):37–43.
2. Krings T, Geibprasert S, terBrugge K.Classication and endovas­cular Management of Pediatric Cerebral Vascular Malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2010;21(3):463–82. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.nec.2010.03.010.
3. Müller-Forell W, Valavanis A.How angioarchitecture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations should inuence the therapeutic considerations. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1995;38(01):32–40.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 2008- 1053458.
4. Mast H, Young WL, Koennecke HC, et al. Risk of spontaneous haemorrhage after diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous malforma­tion. Lancet. 1997;350:1065.
5. Lasjaunias P. A revised concept of the congenital nature of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Interv Neuroradiol. 1997;3(4):275–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/159101999700300401.
6. Valavanis A, Yasargil MG. The endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations. In: Cohadon F, Dolenc VV, Antunes JL, et al., editors. Advances and technical standards in neurosur­gery, vol. 24. Vienna: Springer; 1998. p. 131–214. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978- 3- 7091- 6504- 1_4.
(white arrow) (from D9 segmental artery) and draining into the dilated anterior spinal vein superiorly (arrowhead). (c & d) Microcatheter was navigated into the radiculomedullary artery close to stula, wedged along the vessel wall and concentrated NBCA glue (90%) was injected to obliterate the stula site and proximal venous pouch. (e) Control angiogram revealed the full occlusion of the macrostula. (f) MRI after 15days revealed thrombosis within the venous pouch
7. Hak JF, Boulouis G, Kerleroux B, et al. Noninvasive follow-up imaging of ruptured pediatric brain AVMs using arterial spin­labeling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43(9):1363–8. https://doi.
org/10.3174/ajnr.A7612.
8. Heit JJ, Thakur NH, Iv M, etal. Arterial-spin labeling MRI iden­ties residual cerebral arteriovenous malformation following ste­reotactic radiosurgery treatment. J Neuroradiol. 2020;47(1):13–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2018.12.004.
9. Spetzler RF, Martin NA.A proposed grading system for arteriove­nous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986;65(4):476–83. https://doi.
org/10.3171/jns.1986.65.4.0476.
10. Lawton MT, Kim H, McCulloch CE, Mikhak B, Young WL.A sup­plementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriove­nous malformations for surgery. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):702–13.
https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000367555.16733.E1.
11. Dumont TM, Kan P, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI.A proposed grading system for endovascular treatment of cere­bral arteriovenous malformations: Buffalo score. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:3. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152- 7806.148847.
12. Mohr JP, Parides MK, Stapf C, etal. Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):614–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140- 6736(13)62302- 8.
13 Interventions inIntracranial andSpinal Arteriovenous Malformations
153
13. Al-Shahi Salman R, White PM, Counsell CE, etal. Outcome after conservative management or intervention for Unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1661. https://
doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3200.
14. van Rooij WJ, Jacobs S, Sluzewski M, van der Pol B, Beute GN, Sprengers ME.Curative embolization of brain arteriovenous mal­formations with onyx: patient selection, embolization technique, and results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(7):1299–304.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2947.
15. Fournier D, TerBrugge KG, Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Montanera W. Endovascular treatment of intracerebral arteriovenous malfor­mations: experience in 49 cases. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(2):228–33.
https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.2.0228.
16. Lasjaunias P, Manelfe C, Terbrugge K. Endovascular treat­ment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurg Rev. 1986;9(4):265–75.
17. Mounayer C, Hammami N, Piotin M, etal. Nidal embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations using onyx in 94 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(3):518–23.
18. Saatci I, Geyik S, Yavuz K, Cekirge HS. Endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations with prolonged intranidal Onyx injection technique: long-term results in 350 consecutive patients with completed endovascular treatment course: clinical article. JNS. 2011;115(1):78–88. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.
JNS09830.
19. Mosimann PJ, Chapot R. Contemporary endovascular techniques for the curative treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and review of neurointerventional outcomes. J Neurosurg Sci. 2018;62(4):505. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390- 5616.18.04421- 1.
20. Vollherbst DF, Chapot R, Bendszus M, Möhlenbruch MA.Glue, onyx, squid or PHIL? Liquid embolic agents for the embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and Dural arteriovenous s­tulas. Clin Neuroradiol. 2022;32(1):25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00062- 021- 01066- 6.
21. Weber W, Kis B, Siekmann R, Kuehne D.Endovascular treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with onyx: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(2):371–7.
22. Murayama Y, Viñuela F, Ulhoa A, et al. Nonadhesive liq­uid embolic agent for cerebral arteriovenous malforma­tions: preliminary histopathological studies in swine rete mirabile. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(5):1164–72. https://doi.
org/10.1097/00006123- 199811000- 00081.
23. Wang J, Wu HC, Wang WW, etal. Trigeminal cardiac reex caused by Onyx embolization of intracranial dural arteriovenous stula. Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(3):325–30.
24. Flores BC, See AP, Weiner GM, Jankowitz BT, Ducruet AF, Albuquerque FC.Use of the Apollo detachable-tip microcatheter for endovascular embolization of arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous stulas. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(3):963–71. https://
doi.org/10.3171/2017.9.JNS17397.
25. Chapot R, Stracke P, Velasco A, etal. The pressure cooker technique for the treatment of brain AVMs. J Neuroradiol. 2014;41(1):87–91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2013.10.001.
26. Waldeck S, Chapot R, Von Falck C, Froelich MF, Brockmann M, Overhoff D.First experience in the control of the venous side of the brain AVM. JCM. 2021;10(24):5771. https://doi.org/10.3390/
jcm10245771.
27. He Y, Bai W, Xu B, et al. Perioperative complications of Transvenous embolization of ruptured intracranial arteriove­nous malformations. Front Neurol. 2022;13:873186. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fneur.2022.873186.
28. Koyanagi M, Mosimann PJ, Nordmeyer H, et al. The trans­venous retrograde pressure cooker technique for the curative embolization of high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2021;13(7):637–41. https://doi.org/10.1136/
neurintsurg- 2020- 016566.
29. Lv X, Jiang C, Wang J.Pediatric intracranial arteriovenous shunts: advances in diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2020;25:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.12.025.
30. Kuiper L, Sánchez Van Kammen M, Coert BA, etal. Association between Dural AVFs and cerebral venous thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43(12):1722–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.
A7652.
31. Kondo R, Kumabe T, Yamamoto D, Koizumi H, Kuroda H, Miyasaka K. Visual disorders caused by cranial arteriove­nous stula with venous drainage into the superior ophthal­mic vein. Interv Neuroradiol. 2019;25(4):460–8. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1591019919829626.
32. Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA. A proposed classication for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous stulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg. 1995;82(2):166–79.
https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.2.0166.
33. D’Aliberti G, Talamonti G, Boeris D, etal. Intracranial Dural arte­riovenous stulas: the sinus and non-sinus concept. In: Esposito G, Regli L, Cenzato M, Kaku Y, Tanaka M, Tsukahara T, editors. Trends in cerebrovascular surgery and interventions. Springer;
2021. Accessed March 27, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
books/NBK573772/.
34. Xu K, Yang X, Li C, Yu J.Current status of endovascular treatment for dural arteriovenous stula of the transverse-sigmoid sinus: a literature review. Int J Med Sci. 2018;15(14):1600–10. https://doi.
org/10.7150/ijms.27683.
35. Kortman H, Boukrab I, Sluzewski M, Van Rooij WJ, Peluso JP, Majoie C. Endovascular treatment of dural arteriovenous stulas with sinus drainage: do we really need to protect the sinus? Interv Neuroradiol. 2019;25(3):315–21. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1591019918819187.
36. Rabinov JD, Yoo AJ, Ogilvy CS, Carter BS, Hirsch JA.ONYX ver­sus n-BCA for embolization of cranial dural arteriovenous stulas. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2013;5(4):306–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/
neurintsurg- 2011- 010237.
37. Renieri L, Michelozzi C, Brinjikji W, et al. PTA stent of Dural sinuses in brain DAVF: a report of 4 cases. Clin Neuroradiol. 2019;29(2):331–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062- 017- 0652- 2.
38. Raybaud CA, Strother CM, Hald JK. Aneurysms of the vein of Galen: embryonic considerations and anatomical features relat­ing to the pathogenesis of the malformation. Neuroradiology. 1989;31(2):109–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698838.
39. Lasjaunias PL, Chng SM, Sachet M, Alvarez H, Rodesch G, Garcia­Monaco R.The Management of Vein of Galen aneurysmal malfor­mations. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(suppl_5):S3-184–94. https://doi.
org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000237445.39514.16.
40. Agarwal H, Sebastian LJD, Gaikwad SB, Garg A, Mishra NK.Vein of Galen aneurysmal malformation—clinical and angiographic spectrum with management perspective: an institutional experience. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2017;9(2):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/
neurintsurg- 2015- 012137.
41. Alvarez H, Garcia Monaco R, Rodesch G, Sachet M, Krings T, Lasjaunias P. Vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007;17(2):189–206. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.nic.2007.02.005.
42. Arko L, Lambrych M, Montaser A, Zurakowski D, Orbach DB.Fetal and neonatal MRI predictors of aggressive early clinical course in vein of Galen malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(6):1105–11. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6585.
43. Miyasaka K, Asano T, Ushikoshi S, Hida K, Koyanagi I.Vascular anatomy of the spinal cord and classication of spinal arterio­venous malformations. Interv Neuroradiol. 2000;6(Suppl 1): 195–8.
44. Takai K. Spinal arteriovenous shunts: angioarchitecture and historical changes in classication. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017;57(7):356–65. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2016- 0316.
154
L. J. D. Sebastian et al.
45. Rodesch G, Lasjaunias P. Spinal cord arteriovenous shunts: from imaging to management. Eur J Radiol. 2003;46(3):221–32. https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0720- 048X(03)00093- 7.
46. Kona MP, Buch K, Singh J, Rohatgi S. Spinal vascular shunts: a patterned approach. Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;14:2110. https://doi.
org/10.3174/ajnr.A7312.
47. Krings T, Geibprasert S. Spinal dural arteriovenous stulas. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(4):639–48. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.
A1485.

Other Neurointerventions

LeveJosephDevarajanSebastian, NikhilaGunnaReddy, andSavyasachiJain
14
Key Messages
1. Apart from intracranial aneurysms, Arterio-Venous mal­formations (AVMs), and stroke, a neurointerventionist has to tackle a wide range of vascular and sometimes non­vascular problems of the head, neck, and spine.
2. Endovascular coiling is the technique of choice for carotico-cavernous stula (CCF).
3. Massive epistaxis caused by cavernous internal carotid artery (cICA) pathologies can be managed by endovascu­lar means.
4. Intra-arterial chemotherapy is used as salvage therapy in retinoblastoma when systemic chemotherapy and intra­vitreous treatments fail.
5. Preoperative embolization is performed in many tumors such as meningioma, hemangioblastoma, nasopharyn­geal angiobroma, glomus jugulare, and paragangliomas to reduce blood loss.

14.1 Introduction

Apart from aneurysms, AVMs, and stroke, a neurointerven­tionist is called to tackle a wide range of vascular and some­times nonvascular problems involving the head, neck, and spine. Here we shall briey review some of these conditions. This will be largely a pictorial essay based on illustrative cases.

14.2 Direct CCF

Penetrating injuries by sharp objects can lead to CCF, especially in children. Injury to cavernous ICA during skull base or trans-sphenoidal surgeries can also cause CCF.
14.2.1 Relevant Anatomy andPathogenesis
Cavernous ICA (C4 segment) is surrounded by the venous plexus (cavernous sinus) and is partially xed by the dura distally at the dural ring just before the ICA enters subarach­noid space and proximally to the petrous bone. This relative xity of the ICA in the region makes it vulnerable to injuries.
Since cavernous sinus has extensive connections, ow from the stula can be in multiple directions. Clinical symp­toms and severity depend on the direction and severity of venous ow, as listed below. In many cases, symptoms are predominantly due to venous hypertension [1]. Symptoms due to arterial steal can also occur.
Anterior: drainage into the ophthalmic venous system pro-
duces proptosis, chemosis, raised ocular pressure (glau-
coma), and loss of vision. Posterior: drains into the inferior/superior petrosal sinus or
the occipital transverse sinus. Patients complain of tinni-
tus or cranial nerve dysfunction. Contralateral: both cavernous sinuses anastomose anteri-
orly and posteriorly. Both eyes may be involved with vari-
able severity.
Direct CCFs are mostly traumatic in nature and are common in the Indian subcontinent mostly due to road trafc acci­dents, especially motorbike accidents. It is more common in young males.
L. J. D. Sebastian (*) · N. G. Reddy · S. Jain Department of Neuro-radiology and Neurointerventions, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 S. H. Chandrashekhara (ed.), Textbook of Interventional Radiology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9601-4_14
14.2.2 Treatment
It is essentially endovascular (Figs. 14.1 and 14.2). DSA helps determine the exact location of stula and adequacy of the cross-ow. Previously available options include emboli­zation with detachable balloons, an elegant way of treatment. It requires 8F or 9F access and the meticulous process of loading of a suitable gold valve balloon of suitable size in the
155
156
L. J. D. Sebastian et al.
a
e
b
f
c
d
g
Fig. 14.1 Endovascular treatment of direct CCF by simple coiling. A young man presented with right proptosis 3months after a road trafc accident. Right ICA angiogram in anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) projections demonstrates the direct CCF with near complete steal. Cross-compression study reveal the exact location of the stula. Here
specially designed delivery microcatheter. This technique is almost obsolete as the balloons are no more available in many parts of the world.
Coiling Currently endovascular coiling is the technique of choice. We can take transarterial, transvenous, or both. One or two microcatheters may be used. A balloon microcatheter can also be used to prevent coil prolapse into the parent artery. Strategic coiling aimed at reducing gradient across the stula and increasing antegrade laminar ow helps early obliteration of the stula with a minimum number of coils [2, 3].
vertebral angiogram in lateral projection (c) with right carotid manual compression shows the rent close to the anterior genu of right cavern­ous ICA.A microcatheter is navigated across the stula (d) and pro­gressive coiling is done (e and f). Control angiogram (g) shows complete occlusion of the stula with restoration of antegrade ow
Onyx (high density) can also be used along with coils where protection of the neck by a balloon microcatheter is essential.
Parent artery occlusion can also be done in severely lac­erated arteries if there is adequate cross-ow.
Outcomes Generally immediate improvement in proptosis
and chemosis is seen with good long-term outcomes. However, decits due to direct injury, e.g., loss of vision due to optic nerve injury, may not be reversed. Hence thorough pre-op examination and prognostication are essential.
bc
14 Other Neurointer ventions
a
157
d
Fig. 14.2 Endovascular treatment of direct CCF by detachable balloons. Right ICA angiogram (a, b) shows direct CCF with rent in the horizontal segment of cavernous ICA. A detachable balloon mounted on a delivery microcatheter is navigated across the stula (c) and inated and detached
e

14.3 Epistaxis

Massive epistaxis due to cavernous internal carotid artery (cICA) pathology is a life-threatening condition. Most com­mon causes are craniofacial trauma, mishaps during skull base surgeries, and rarely spontaneous rupture of giant, dis­secting, or mycotic cICA aneurysms. Immediate post nasal packing can provide temporary cessation of nasal bleeding, but denitive management of cICA aneurysm is a must, oth­erwise recurrence will be there. Surgical management of cICA aneurysm is often cumbersome and difcult, whereas endovascular methods can offer better solutions.
• The diagnosis of clinically suspected cICA pathology caus­ing nasal bleeding should be conrmed using CT imaging, CT angiography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Catheter angiography (DSA—digital subtraction angiography) is the gold standard and offers the opportunity to perform endovascular treatment simultaneously [4, 5].
• Management options are endovascular embolization, clipping of aneurysm neck, or ligation of the internal
f
close to the rent by gently pulling the microcatheter. Native image (d)shows two such balloons deployed sequentially. The inated balloons on the venous side of the rent shut the stula. Control angiogram shows (e, f) complete sealing of the stula with good antegrade ow
carotid artery. Endovascular treatment is often superior to surgical management.
• Being relatively rare conditions, there are no well-set guidelines evolved for the treatment of cICA pseudoaneu­rysms. Both vessel preserving (reconstructive procedure) and parent artery occlusion (deconstructive) techniques have been proposed in the literature for the management of cICA pathology depending upon several factors like the etiology, anatomy of rent, involved segment length, site, diseased or dissected segment of ICA proximal or distal to lesion, age of the patient, and the status of cross circulation.
• Trapping of the pseudoaneurysm by parent artery occlu­sion (PAO) by coils is a safe and effective treatment strat­egy in patients with patent circle of Willis and good collateral circulation. Deploying some coils in the aneu­rysmal sac, i.e., endosaccular coiling along with PAO pro­vides additional safety by eliminating the chance of recanalization. This method of treatment is especially preferred if a long segment of the arterial segment is dis­eased or dissected. As implied, prior balloon occlusion
158
L. J. D. Sebastian et al.
test is preferable before proceeding with permanent occlusion.
• Treatment decisions become difcult when collateral cir­culation is proven inadequate on balloon occlusion test in a given patient. An emergency external carotid-middle cerebral artery (ECA–MCA) bypass followed by PAO as described above is an option, though it is logistically chal­lenging in many centers. Use of ow diverter or stent graft may be useful in such cases.
• Reconstruct techniques include endosaccular coiling, stent-assisted coiling, stent graft, or ow diverter place­ment [6]. Endosaccular coiling can be challenging as it involves careful selective coiling of the pseudoaneurysm which invariably projects into the sphenoid sinus. If the aneurysmal neck is broad or of dissecting type, it will be difcult to safeguard the parent arterial lumen. Stent­assisted coiling is of help in these situations. Though bare stents are technically easy to deploy, there are multiple reports related to recanalization of the PSAs after using such stents as the blood can ow through the interstices in the stent into the pseudoaneurysm [7, 8].
• Covered stents or stent grafts, when deployed optimally, are the fool-proof means of immediate and complete obliteration of PSAs. But they are relatively stiffer, and their negotiability and deployment are challenging, espe­cially in intracranial ICA [9]. Various reported complica­tions such as embolic strokes, dissection, thrombosis, rupture, and stent kinks are the potential drawbacks.

14.4 Neck Vessel Pathologies

14.4.1 Pediatric Pseudoaneurysms oftheNeck
14.4.2 Etiopathogenesis
• Most common causes are infection and trauma. A few rare cases of congenital aneurysms and spontaneous dis­secting aneurysms in the setting of weakened vessel wall such as collagen vascular disorders and neurobromato­sis- I are also reported [10]. Infections of the deep neck space including retropharyngeal/parapharyngeal/periton­silar abscesses and cervical lymphadenitis can involve the arterial wall contiguously, resulting in pseudoaneurysm.
• Traumatic pseudoaneurysms are common as the child ages, especially in teenage children, probably due to the increased outdoor activities. Traumatic pseudoaneurysms are reported after a fall from trampoline and paintball injuries.
• These aneurysms are also seen after iatrogenic trauma in the setting of tonsillectomy or abscess drainage of neck space infections. Pseudoaneurysms arising after partial healing of either traumatic or spontaneous dissection, especially of vertebral arteries, are usually small with or without coexisting stenosis of the involved vessel [11].
14.4.3 Clinical Presentation
The etiology and location of the aneurysm dictate the clinical presentation in a given case. Large pulsatile neck swelling, difculty in breathing or stridor due to airway compression, and difculty in swallowing due to pharyngeal compression are some of the common presentations. Stroke or transient ischemic attacks due to emboli and life-threatening bleeding are other presentations.
Infectious or posttraumatic pseudoaneurysms involving major arteries of the neck are not uncommon in pediatric population. They are often associated with or mimic lymph nodal or other inammatory masses of the neck such that an unsuspecting physician may tend to biopsy or drain them with disastrous consequences. High index of suspicion and a good quality ultrasonogram and Doppler examination will help make the correct diagnosis in most of the cases. CT angiogram is useful for treatment planning and for clarifying the diagnosis in doubtful cases.
These lesions carry the potential for massive bleeding or airway compression due to sudden enlargement. Hence timely evaluation and treatment are warranted. Surgical treatment is often difcult and cumbersome while endovas­cular techniques can offer simpler solutions in most of the cases (Figs. 14.3 and 14.4). Parent vessel occlusion is the commonly adopted strategy, while in selected cases recon­structive approaches are also possible as illustrated here.
14.4.4 Management
• In acute presentations attention should be paid to basic resuscitation steps before venturing into denitive treatment.
• Securing airway with elective intubation or tracheostomy will be useful in most of the patients.
• In cases of mycotic aneurysms, appropriate antibiotics in adequate dosage is the rst and essential step in the management.
• Emergent endovascular treatment is indicated in children presenting with life-threatening oral/ear bleeding or rapidly enlarging neck swelling with a fall in hemoglobin. These patients are best treated with parent vessel sacrice after ensuring adequacy of collateral ow to the affected vascu­lar territories. Deconstructive procedures can be surgical ligation of the parent vessel, endovascular parent vessel sacrice, or endovascular trapping of the aneurysm.
a
c
14 Other Neurointer ventions
b
159
d
e
Fig. 14.3 Endovascular management of PSA of neck. CT (a, b) showing large extracranial pseudoaneurysm. Right CCA (c, d) run showing giant distal cervical ICA aneurysm with tortuous cervical ICA.Left vertebral
f
run (e, f) showing good cross-ow across PCOM into the right MCA ter­ritory. Native unsubtracted right CCA angiogram (g) showing patent artery occlusion (PAO) with coils in cervical ICA proximal to the loop
g
• Parent vessel reconstructive procedure can also be suc­cessfully employed in suitable cases, especially in none­mergent situations. Surgical resection of the aneurysmal segment with end-to-end anastomosis or vessel grafting can prove a demanding procedure with high rate of com­plications. Endovascular options like stent-assisted coil­ing or stent graft (covered stent) deployment across the aneurysm offer elegant solutions.
• Use of bare metal stent alone or with coils has a high chance of recurrence. Coils can also erode into the pha­ryngeal mucosa over time and can protrude into the oral or pharyngeal cavity [12, 13].
• Stent graft can provide immediate sealing off of the aneu­rysm [14]. Favorable factors for using the stent graft include relatively straight segment of the involved vessel,