- •LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA
- •CONTENTS
- •FOREWORD
- •PREFACE
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. A Nice Equation for an Heuristic Power
- •3. SWOT Method, Non Integer Diff-Integral and Co-Dimension
- •4. The Generalization of the Exponential Concept
- •5. Diffusion Under Field
- •6. Riemann Zeta Function and Non-Integer Differentiation
- •7. Auto Organization and Emergence
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgment
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Preliminaries
- •3. The Model
- •4. Numerical Simulations
- •5. Synchronization
- •6. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction: A Short Literature Review
- •2. The Injection System
- •3. The Control Strategy: Switching of Fractional Order Controllers by Gain Scheduling
- •4. Fractional Order Control Design
- •5. Simulation Results
- •6. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgment
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •1. Basic Definitions and Preliminaries
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Context and Problematic
- •2. Parameters and Definitions
- •3. Semi-Infinite Plane
- •4. Responses in the Semi-Infinite Plane
- •5. Finite Plane
- •6. Responses in Finite Plane
- •7. Simulink Responses
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Modelling
- •3. Temperature Control
- •4. Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Preliminaries
- •3. Second Order Sliding Mode Control Strategy
- •4. Adaptation Law Synthesis
- •5. Numerical Studies
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Rabotnov’s Fractional Operators and Main Formulas of Algebra of Fractional Operators
- •4. Calculation of the Main Viscoelastic Operators
- •5. Relationship of Rabotnov Fractional Operators with Other Fractional Operators
- •8. Application of Rabotnov’s Operators in Problems of Impact Response of Thin Structures
- •9. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •3. Theory of Diffusive Stresses
- •4. Diffusive Stresses
- •5. Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Methods
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgment
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Basics of Fractional PID Controllers
- •3. Tuning Methodology for Fuzzy Fractional PID Controllers
- •4. Optimal Fuzzy Fractional PID Controllers
- •5. Conclusion
- •References
- •INDEX
Fractional Calculus in Mechanics of Solids |
177 |
|
|
Using the Vi´ete theorem, from (41) and (46) we have
t−1 γ t−2 γ = τ1−γ τ2−γ (1 + n1 + n2),
τ1−γ τ2−γ = t−1 γ t−2 γ (1 − m1 − m2),
or
|
t1−γ t2−γ |
= 1 + n1 |
+ n2, |
(47) |
||
|
−γ |
−γ |
||||
|
τ1 |
τ2 |
|
|
|
|
τ1−γ τ2−γ |
= 1 − m1 |
− m2. |
(48) |
|||
t−γ t−γ |
|
|||||
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Formulas (47) and (48) are generalized easily over the case of the operators defined by relationships (23) and (24). In this case, they look like as follows:
|
n |
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i=1 |
|
||
Q tj |
|
|
|
|||||
i=1 |
τi |
|
|
|
n |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
= 1 + |
X |
(49) |
|
|
n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
j=1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
n |
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
j=1 tj |
|
|
|
n |
|
|||
Q τi |
|
|
|
− j=1 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
= 1 |
|
X |
(50) |
|
n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i=1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.Calculation of the Main Viscoelastic Operators
4.1. The Case of Constant Operator of the Bulk Extension-Compression e
K
For the majority of viscoelastic materials, the bulk modulus remains a constant value during the process of mechanical deformation, i.e.,
1 −e2ν |
= 1 − 2ν∞ , |
(51) |
E |
E∞ |
|
e
where ν∞ is the nonrelaxed Poisson’s ratio, and νe is Poisson’s operator. From (51) with due account for (19) we have
νe = ν∞ + |
1 |
(1 − 2ν∞) νε 3γ (τεγ ) . |
(52) |
2 |
Further we will require the operators (1 + νe)−1 and (1 − νe)−1, which are determined considering (52) according to the above developed procedure, i.e.,
1 + ν∞ + 21 (1 |
− 2ν∞) νε 3γ |
(τε ) |
|
1 + ν∞ |
− 3 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
= |
1 |
1 |
B |
γ (t1γ ) , |
(53) |
|
|
γ |
|
Complimentary Contributor Copy
178 |
Yury A. Rossikhin and Marina V. Shitikova |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 − ν∞ − 21 (1 − 2ν∞) νε 3γ |
(τε ) |
|
1 − ν∞ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
= |
1 |
1 + D |
|
γ (t2γ ) , |
(54) |
|
|
γ |
|
|
where B, tγ1 , and D, tγ2 are yet unknown constants.
Multiplying the operators in the right-hand sides of Eqs. (53) and (54), respectively, by the denominator of the fraction in their left-hand side parts and considering (21), we are led to the following equations:
2 |
|
|
|
1 + ν∞ |
|
− |
|
τε |
− t1 |
3γ ε |
|
− |
|
− 2 |
|
1 + ν∞ |
τε − t1 |
3γ |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1 |
|
(1 − 2ν∞) νε |
|
1 |
|
B |
|
τεγ |
|
|
|
(τ γ ) |
|
B 1 |
|
1 |
|
(1 − 2ν∞) νε |
|
t1γ |
|
|
|
(t1γ ) |
= 0, |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
γ |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55) |
|
|
1 (1 − 2ν∞) νε |
» |
|
|
|
τεγ |
– |
|
γ |
|
|
» |
|
1 (1 − 2ν∞) νε |
t2γ |
– |
|
γ |
) = 0. |
|
|||||||||||||||
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
γ |
(τ |
ε |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
2 |
(56) |
|||||||||
2 1 − ν∞ |
|
|
|
τεγ − tγ |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 − ν∞ |
τεγ |
− tγ |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1 + D |
|
|
|
|
|
) + D 1 + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
(t |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vanishing to zero the terms in square brackets in (55) and (56), we could determine the unknown constants
|
|
|
|
B = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 − 2ν∞)νε |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
τεγ − t1γ |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
(57) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2(1 + ν∞) + νε(1 − 2ν∞) |
|
|
|
τεγ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
t−γ |
= τ −γ |
|
|
1 + |
|
(1 − 2ν∞) νε |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
tγ |
= |
|
τεγ |
, |
|
|
(58) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2(1 + ν∞) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
ε |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
D = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 − 2ν∞)νε |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
τεγ |
− t2γ |
, |
|
|
|
(59) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2ν |
|
|
) |
|
− |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2(1 |
− |
ν |
|
) |
|
− |
ν (1 |
− |
|
|
|
|
τ γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∞ |
|
|
|
ε |
|
∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ε |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
ε |
|
|
− |
2(1 − ν∞) |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
t−γ |
= τ −γ |
|
|
1 |
|
|
(1 − 2ν∞) νε |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
tγ = |
|
τεγ |
, |
|
|
(60) |
|||||||||||||||||
where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
A = |
2(1 + ν∞) + νε(1 − 2ν∞) |
> 1, |
C = |
2(1 − ν∞) − νε(1 − 2ν∞) |
< 1. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2(1 + ν∞) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2(1 − ν∞) |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Now we could calculate operators |
and |
λ. Really, considering (19) and (53), (57), |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(58), we find |
|
2(1 e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
µ |
|
|
e |
|
|
|
1 + ν∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
3 |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
µ = |
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
E∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
νε |
γ |
(τε ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
B |
|
|
γ (t1 ) . |
(61) |
||||||||||
|
|
e |
|
+ ν) 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
operators entering in (61) and considering (21), we have |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multiplying |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t1γ 3γ |
ε − |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t1γ |
3γ 1 |
|
||||||||||||
|
∞ − ε − τεγ |
τεγ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ε τεγ |
tγ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
µ = µ 1 |
|
ν 1 |
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(τ γ ) |
|
B 1 + ν |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
(t ) , (62) |
|||||||||||||||||
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
where µ∞ is the nonrelaxed shear modulus.
But according (57)
1 − Bτεγ (τεγ − tγ1 )−1 = 0,
Complimentary Contributor Copy
Fractional Calculus in Mechanics of Solids |
179 |
|
|
and |
1 + νε τεγ − t1γ |
|
= |
2(1 + ν∞)A, |
||
B |
||||||
|
|
t1γ |
|
|
3νε |
|
and finally relationship (62) with due account for (63) takes the form
µ = µ∞ |
1 − 2(1 + ν∞)A |
3γ |
A |
. |
|||
|
|
3ν |
|
|
τ |
γ |
|
e |
|
ε |
|
|
ε |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To define operator e1, let us use the following formula:
λ
e |
(1 − 2 e e |
|
|
|
1 −e2ν |
− 3 |
e |
|
λ = |
E ν |
|
= |
1 |
E |
1 |
E |
. |
|
ν)(1 + ν) |
|
3 |
e |
|
1 + ν |
||
|
e |
e |
|
|
|
e |
(63)
(64)
(65)
The first operator in the right-hand side of (65), according to (51), is a constant, while the second one within an accuracy of a constant coincides with formula (64). Thus,
|
λ = 3 1 |
|
2ν∞ − |
|
3 1 + ν∞ 1 − 2(1 + ν∞)A 3γ |
A |
|
, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
e |
1 |
|
|
E∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
1 E∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3νε |
|
|
|
|
τεγ |
|
|||||||||
or |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2(1 + ν∞)A |
3γ |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
λ = λ |
|
|
1 + |
(1 − 2ν∞)νε |
|
|
|
|
τεγ |
|
, |
|
|
|
(66) |
||||||||||||||
where λ∞ is the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
nonrelaxed magnitude of the second Lame parameter. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
In conclusion of this Subsection, we will calculate the operator |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
−e |
ν2 |
= 2 |
|
|
1 + ν + |
1 |
− |
ν |
, |
|
|
|
|
(67) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which within an accuracy of a constant coincides with the operator of cylindrical rigidity and is of frequent use in the problems dealing with mechanical behavior of thin bodies.
Substituting (19), (53), and (54) in (67), multiplying the operators involving in the enumerated relationships and using (21), we obtain
|
1 −eν2 |
|
|
|
1 − ν∞2 |
|
− 3 |
|
− 3 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
E |
|
|
|
E∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
where |
e |
= |
|
|
1 |
|
|
m1 |
γ (t1 ) m2 |
γ (t2 ) , |
(68) |
|||||||
|
3 |
|
B(1 − ν∞) |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
D(1 + ν∞) |
|
|
||||||
|
m1 = |
|
, |
|
m2 = |
|
. |
(69) |
||||||||||
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 (1 − 2ν∞) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
(1 − 2ν∞) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
In order to find an operator reverse to the operator (68), let us represent it in the form |
||||||||||||||||||
|
1 − ν2 |
= |
1 − ν∞2 |
1 |
+ n |
|
(τ γ ) + n |
|
(τ γ ) , |
(70) |
||||||||
|
3γ |
3γ |
||||||||||||||||
|
Ee |
|
|
|
E∞ |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
||||
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where τ1γ , τ2γ , and n1, n2 are yet unknown constants which are determined from Eqs. (44) and (45). It is convenient to rewrite these equations in another form. Thus, the equation for defining the values τiγ has the form
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
1 + m1 |
|
|
+ m2 |
|
|
= 0, x = τiγ |
(i = 1, 2), |
(71) |
γ |
− x |
γ |
|
|||||
|
t1 |
|
t2 |
− x |
|
|
Complimentary Contributor Copy
180 |
Yury A. Rossikhin and Marina V. Shitikova |
|
|
or with due account for (69)
1 + |
3 |
|
B(1 − ν∞) |
|
|
|
x |
|
+ |
1 D(1 + ν∞) x |
= 0. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 (1 − 2ν∞) (t2γ − x) |
||||||||||||||
|
2 (1 − 2ν∞) (t1γ − x) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
A set of equations for finding n1 and n2 is the following: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
tγ |
|
n1 + |
|
|
tγ |
|
n2 = 1, |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
τ |
γ |
γ |
|
τ |
γ |
−t |
γ |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
1 |
−t |
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
t2γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t2γ |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
τ1γ −t2γ |
n1 + |
τ2γ −t2γ |
n2 = 1. |
|
(72)
(73)
It could be shown that if substitute τεγ instead of x in (71) or (72) , then the following identity could be obtained:
τεγ τεγ
1 ≡ −m1 tγ1 − τεγ − m2 tγ2 − τεγ .
In order to find the second root of Eq. (71) or (72), let us rewrite it in the form
(1 − m1 − m2) x2 − (tγ1 + tγ2 − m1tγ2 − m2tγ1 ) x + tγ1 tγ2 = 0.
Due to the Vi´ete theorem, if the first root is x1 = τ1γ = τεγ , then the second root x2 satisfies the relationship
τεγ x2 = |
t1γ t2γ |
. |
|
||
Calculations show that |
1 − m1 − m2 |
|
|
|
|
t1γ t2γ |
τε2γ |
1 − m1 − m2 = 1 − νε .
(74)
(75)
= τ1γ
(76)
(77)
But τεγ (1 − νε)−1 = τσγ , and from (77) it follows that x2 = τ2γ = τσγ . Substituting the found τ1γ = τεγ and τ2γ = τσγ in the set of Eqs. (73), we obtain
|
|
|
|
|
2(1−ν∞) |
n1 |
− |
|
2(1−ν∞) |
n2 |
= 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
(1−2ν∞)ν |
|
|
νσ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
2(1+ν∞)ε |
|
|
2 1+ν∞ |
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
(78) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n1 + |
3 |
νσ |
n2 |
= 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
(1−2ν∞)νε |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
whence it follows |
|
|
(1 − 2ν∞)2νε |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3νσ |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
n1 = |
, |
|
n2 = |
|
. |
|
|
(79) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(1 − ν∞2 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(1 − ν∞2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Considering aforesaid, we have |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4(1 − ν∞2 |
|
3 |
|
|||||||||
|
Ee |
|
E∞ |
|
|
|
4(1 − ν∞2 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
) |
||||||||
|
1 − ν2 |
= |
1 − ν∞2 |
1 |
+ |
(1 − 2ν∞)2νε |
|
(τ |
γ ) + |
3νσ |
|
|
|
|
(τ γ ) . (80) |
|||||||
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
ε |
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
σ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thus, we obtain two important mutually reciprocal operators (68) and (80) which are widely used in different applications.
Besides, two useful formulas have been found
t1γ t2γ = τεγ τσγ (1 − m1 − m2), |
(81) |
t1γ (1 − m2) + t2γ (1 − m1) = (τεγ + τσγ ) (1 − m1 − m2). |
(82) |
Complimentary Contributor Copy
Fractional Calculus in Mechanics of Solids |
181 |
|
|
4.2.The Main Case
In the previous Subsection we have not take the second, or bulk, viscosity into account, in spite the fact that there are numerous evidence of its existence in scientific literature [36, 39, 74, 75].
One of the first papers in the field was published by Meshkov and Pachevskaya [39], wherein the attempt for considering the influence of the bulk relaxation on the internal friction phenomenon was carried out on the example of longitudinal harmonic vibrations of a three-dimensional hereditary elastic rod under the conditions of homogeneous deformation. A fractional exponential function has been used as a hereditary kernel. Investigation of the frequency dependence of the tangent of the phase shift between the stress and deformation, i.e., mechanical loss tangent, has revealed two peaks, namely, shear and bulk, in so doing the peak due to the shear deformation is five times larger than that resulting from the bulk deformation.
e |
µ |
e |
∞ |
|
|
|
|
ε1 |
|
γ |
ε1 |
|
|
|
|
Assume that operators µ and K are given in the form |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
3 |
|
γ |
|
|
||
|
e |
= µ |
|
|
1 |
|
|
ν |
|
|
(τ γ ) , |
, |
(83) |
||
|
|
|
∞ |
1 |
− |
νε2 |
|
γ |
ε2 |
|
|
||||
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
(τ |
|
|
|||||
|
K = K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
(84) |
where νε1 = 1 − µ0µ−∞1 = 1 − τεγ1τσ−1γ , νε2 = 1 − K0K∞−1 = 1 − τεγ2τσ−2γ , µ0 and µ∞, K0 and K∞ are relaxed and nonrelaxed shear and bulk moduli, respectively, τε1 and τσ1, τε2
and τσ2 are relaxation and retardation times, the subscript l relates to shear relaxation and the subscript 2 to bulk relaxation.
Starting from formulas (83) and (84), reciprocal operators have the form
µ1e = µ−∞1 1 + νσ1 3γ (τσγ1) ,
1e = K∞−1 1 + νσ2 3γ (τσγ2) , K
where νσ1 = µ∞µ−0 1 − 1 = τσγ1τε−1γ − 1, and νσ2 = K∞K0−1 − 1 = τσγ2τε−2γ − 1. First we calculate the operator of compliance
|
|
J = |
E = |
3 |
|
|
|
3Kµ |
e |
= 3 µ + 3K . |
|
||||||||||
|
|
e |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
e |
1 1 |
1 |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
1 3K + µ |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in (87) yields |
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
e |
|
|
|||||||
|
Substituting (85) and (86) e |
|
|
|
|
e e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3γ |
(τσγ2) , |
|||||||
|
J = J∞ |
1 + 3 µ∞ |
3γ (τσγ1) + 9 K∞ |
||||||||||||||||||
|
e |
|
|
1 νσ1 E∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
1 νσ2 E∞ |
|
|
|||||||||
or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3γ (τσγ1) + 3 (1 − 2ν∞) νσ2 3γ (τσγ2) . |
||||||||||||
|
J = J∞ 1 + 3 (1 + ν∞) νσ1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
e |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
Let us consider longitudinal harmonic vibrations of a three-dimensional hereditary elastic rod under the conditions of homogeneous deformation when harmonic force acts infinitely long. If rod’s axis coincides with the z-axis, then its longitudinal strain is
εzz = p0J eiωt, |
(89) |
Complimentary Contributor Copy
182 |
Yury A. Rossikhin and Marina V. Shitikova |
|
|
where p0 and ω are the amplitude and frequency of the external force. Let us introduce the following operators:
3γ+ (τiγ ) x(t) = Z−∞ |
3γ (−s/τi) x(t − s)ds, |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Z−∞ |
(γ) |
|
|
||||
Iγ x(t) = |
t |
|
(t − s)γ−1 |
x(s)ds. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Then according to (13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
iωt |
X |
|
n |
−γ(n+1) |
γ iωt |
|||
3γ+ |
(τi |
) e |
= |
|
(−1) |
|
τi |
|
I+e , |
|
|
|
|
n=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
but |
|
|
|
|
|
∞ |
|
|
|
|
∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
(−1)nτi−γ(n+1) I+γ eiωt = |
(−1)n(iωτi)−γ(n+1) eiωt, |
|||||||||
n=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
n=0 |
|
|
|
|
(90)
(91)
(92)
and the sum in the right-hand side could be interpreted as an infinite decreasing geometrical progression with the denominator d = −(iωt)−γ . In other words,
|
|
|
|
∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− − |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eiωt |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
eiωt (−1)n(iωτi)−γ(n+1) = |
|
(iωτi)−γ eiωt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1 |
[ |
|
(iωτi)−γ ] |
= |
1 + (iωτi)γ |
, |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
n=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3γ+ (τiγ ) eiωt = |
|
|
1 |
|
|
eiωt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
1 + (iωτi)γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
æi−γ + æiγ |
+ 2 cos ψ ! |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
æi−γ + æiγ |
+ 2 cos ψ − |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
æi−γ |
+ cos ψ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sin ψ |
|
|
iωt |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e , |
(93) |
|||
where æi |
= ωτi, and ψ = |
πγ. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Considering (93), the complex compliance J(iω) has the form |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J(iω) = J |
(ω) − iJ |
|
(ω) = |
3 J∞ (2(1 + ν∞) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
æσ−1γ + æσγ1 |
+ 2 cos ψ |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
0 |
|
00 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
æσγ |
1 + æε−1γ |
+ [1 + (æσ1/æε1)γ ] cos ψ |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
æσ−2γ |
+ æσγ2 |
+ 2 cos ψ |
) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ (1 |
|
|
2ν∞) |
æσγ |
2 + æε−2γ + [1 + (æσ2/æε2)γ ] cos ψ |
||||||||||||||||||||
− |
|
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
||||||
3 |
|
|
|
|
æσ−1γ |
+ æσγ1 + 2 cos ψ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
æσ−2γ |
+ |
æσγ2 + 2 cos ψ |
|
||||||||||||||||
i |
1 |
J∞ |
|
2(1 + ν∞) |
[(æσ1 |
/æε1)γ − 1] sin ψ |
+ (1 |
|
|
2ν∞) |
[(æσ2 |
/æε2)γ − 1] sin ψ |
. (94) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now knowing the value J(iω), it is possible to find the tangent of the mechanical loss angle characterizing the internal friction in a viscoelastic rod
tan δ = |
J00 |
|
J0 . |
(95) |
Complimentary Contributor Copy
Fractional Calculus in Mechanics of Solids |
183 |
|
|
Meshkov and Pachevskaya [39] considered a numerical example with ν∞ = 0.3, µ0/µ∞ = K0/K∞ = 0.8, τε1/τε2 = 103, and ω = 1 in order to establish whether, in principle, a relaxation peak due to bulk deformation can occur. The ln æε2-dependence of tan δ and phase diagram for the compliance J00 = f (J0) were presented in [39] in Figures 1a and 1b, respectively, where the values of the fractional parameter γ were indicated by figures near the corresponding curves. The limiting value γ = 1 in Figure 1a of [39] indicates that the shear and bulk relaxations are described by the standard linear solid model, and it leads to clear separation of the two peaks. If the bulk and shear moduli have equal degrees of relaxation, they make unequal contributions to the total effect defined by Poisson’s ratio ν∞, namely: the shear peak being about 5.5 times larger than the bulk one. Reduction in γ corresponds to broadening of the relaxation spectrum [41], and the difference between the peaks vanishes. The value γ = 0.5 may be considered in this case to correspond to the lower limit for the bulk effect, i. e., bulk relaxation is not seen for all γ < 0.5, although it exists. The possibility of observing bulk relaxation is thus dependent not only on the ratio of the relaxation times for shear and bulk stresses, but also on the parameter that characterizes the width of the relaxation spectrum.
Now we calculate the operator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
3e |
|
e |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ν = |
3K − 2µ . |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K + µ |
|
|
|
||
We will proceed from the operator |
2 |
|
− |
e |
|
e |
|
3γ |
ε2 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
13K + µ = (3K∞ + µ∞) |
|
|
1 3γ (τε1) − m2 |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
m |
|
|
γ |
|
(τ γ ) , |
||
where m |
|
= |
3 |
(1 |
− |
|
|
, and m |
|
= |
3 |
(1 |
+ ν |
)ν |
|
|
|
|||||
|
1 |
|
|
e |
|
∞ |
ε1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
∞ |
ε2 |
|
|
|
|
Operator inverse to operator (97) has the form |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
3K + µ |
= 3K∞ + µ∞ |
|
1 + n1 3γ (tσγ1 ) + n2 3γ (tσγ2 ) , |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
e γ |
|
−1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
and |
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
where the values tσ1 |
e |
tσ2 |
are defined from the quadratic equation |
|
(1 − m1 − m2)x2 − [τεγ1(1 − m2) + τεγ2(1 − m1)] x + τεγ1τεγ2 = 0,
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
while the values n1 and n2 are determined from the set of two equations with due account
for the magnitudes of tσγ |
1 and tσγ |
2 found from Eq. (99) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
τεγ1 |
|
n1 |
+ |
τεγ1 |
|
n2 |
= −1, |
|
|
|
||||
|
τεγ1−tσγ 1 |
τεγ1−tσγ 2 |
|
|
(100) |
|||||||||||
|
τεγ2 |
|
|
|
|
τεγ2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
n1 |
+ |
|
|
|
n2 |
= 1. |
|
|
|
||
|
γ |
|
γ |
γ |
|
γ |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
τε2 |
−tσ1 |
τε2 |
−tσ2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Then from (96) we find |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
2 ) , (101) |
||
ν = ν∞ 1 − s1 3γ (τεγ1) + s2 3γ (τεγ2) 1 + n1 3γ (tσγ |
1 ) + n2 3γ (tσγ |
|||||||||||||||
where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
3K∞νε2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2µ∞νε1 |
|
|||||
s1 = |
|
|
|
|
|
s2 = |
|
|||||||||
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
||||||||||
3K∞ − 2µ∞ |
|
|
3K∞ − 2µ∞ |
|
Complimentary Contributor Copy
184 |
Yury A. Rossikhin and Marina V. Shitikova |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Opening the brackets in (101) with due account for (21) yields |
|||||||||
|
ν = ν∞ 1 + n1 + τεγ2 |
− tσγ1 |
− τεγ1 |
− tσγ1 |
3γ |
(tσ1) |
||||
|
e |
|
s1n1tσγ1 |
|
s2n1tσγ1 |
|
γ |
|||
|
|
s1n2tγ |
|
s2n2tγ |
3γ |
(tσ2) |
||||
|
+ n2 + |
|
τεγ2 |
− tσγ2 |
− τεγ1 |
− tσγ2 |
||||
|
|
|
|
σ2 |
|
|
σ2 |
|
|
γ |
|
− 1 |
|
τεγ2 |
− tσγ1 |
|
τεγ2 |
− tσγ2 |
3γ |
ε2 |
|
|
s + |
|
s1n1τεγ2 |
+ |
s1n2τεγ2 |
|
|
(τ γ ) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ s2 + |
s2n1τεγ1 |
|
|
|
|
|
s2n2τεγ1 |
|
|
|
γ |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
3γ |
(τε1) . |
(102) |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
τεγ1 − tσγ |
1 |
|
|
τεγ1 − tσγ |
2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to find operator E, it is necessary to rewrite operator J in the form |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
J = J |
|
|
|
1 + n |
|
|
|
|
(τ |
γ ) + n |
|
(τ γ |
|
) , |
(103) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
e∞ |
|
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
γ |
|
|
|
σ1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
γ |
σ2 |
e |
|
||||||||
where n1 = |
2 |
(1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2ν∞)νσ2. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
3 |
+ ν∞)νσ1 , and n1 = |
3 |
(1 |
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Then operator E takes the form |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(tεγ1) |
|
|
|
|
|
(tεγ2) , |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
e |
|
|
E = E∞ |
1 |
− |
m1 |
|
|
γ |
|
− |
m2 |
γ |
(104) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
γ |
and |
t |
γ are determined from the following equation: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
where values t |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
ε1 |
|
|
|
εe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n1x |
|
|
|
|
n2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
= |
|
1, x = tε i |
(i = 1, 2), |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
or |
|
|
|
|
τσγ1 − x |
τσγ2 − x |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1 + n1 + n2)x2 − [τσγ1(1 + n2) + τσγ2(1 + n1)] x + τσγ1τσγ2 = 0, |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(105) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and values m1 and m2 are defined from the set of equations |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
τ |
γ |
|
m1 |
+ |
|
|
τ γ |
|
|
m2 = 1, |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
σ1 |
|
|
|
|
|
σ1 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
τ |
γ |
−t |
γ |
τ |
γ |
|
−t |
γ |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
σ1 |
ε1 |
|
|
|
|
|
σ1 |
ε2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
τσγ2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
τσγ2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
τσγ2−tεγ1 |
m1 |
+ |
τσγ2−tεγ2 |
m2 = 1. |
|
|
|
In conclusion of this Subsection we will show how to define the operator proportional |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to the operator of cylindrical rigidity. With this purpose we will use the operators |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 |
= |
|
2 |
|
|
3K + µ |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
= |
|
2(3K + µ) |
, |
|
|
E = |
9Kµ |
. |
|
(107) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 + ν |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
ν |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eK e |
− |
|
|
|
3Ke+ |
4µ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 4µ |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
e |
3K e e |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Then considering (107) we have |
|
|
e |
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
e |
|
e |
|
e |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
E |
+ |
|
|
|
E |
|
|
= µ + |
|
|
9Kµ |
|
= µ + s−1. |
|
(108) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
1 |
−e |
ν |
2 |
2(1 + ν) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2(1 − ν) |
|
|
3K + 4µ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
e |
e |
|
|
e |
e |
|
|
||||||||||
First we will calculate the operator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
e |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
s = |
3K + 4µ |
= |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
4 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
9Kµ |
e |
|
|
3 |
µ + |
|
3 K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
e |
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
3K∞ + 4µ∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3K∞ν |
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3µ∞ν |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
σ1 |
|
|
|
(τ |
|
|
) + |
|
|
|
|
σ2 |
|
|
(τ γ |
(109) |
||||||
= |
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
σ1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
σ2) . |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
9K∞µ∞ |
|
|
|
|
3K∞ + 4µ∞ 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3K∞ + 4µ∞ 3 |
|
|
Complimentary Contributor Copy
|
|
|
Fractional Calculus in Mechanics of Solids |
|
|
185 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
In order to find an operator reverse to operator (109), let us rewrite it in the form |
|
|||||||||||||||
where |
|
|
s = s∞ 1 + n1 3γ (τσγ1) + n2 3γ (τσγ2) , |
|
|
(110) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
+ 4µ |
|
|
|
|
3K∞νσ1 |
|
|
3µ∞νσ2 |
|
|
||
s∞ = |
3K∞e |
|
∞ |
, |
n1 = |
|
, n2 = |
|
. |
|
||||||
9K∞µ∞ |
|
|
3K∞ + 4µ∞ |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3K∞ + 4µ∞ |
|
|||||||
Then |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s−1 = |
|
9Kµ |
= s∞−1 |
1 − m1 3γ (tεγ1 ) − m2 3γ (tεγ2) , |
(111) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
+ |
4µ |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
where values t |
γ |
γ3K e e |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
1 and tε2 |
are determined from Eq. (105), and values m1 and m2 are defined |
|||||||||||||||
|
εe |
|
|
e |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
from the set of Eqs. (106). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, to calculate operator (108), it is necessary to take formulas (83) and (111) into
account. As a result we obtain |
s∞ |
|
|
1 − µ∞s∞ + 1 3γ (τε1) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
ν2 |
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
µ∞s∞ + 1 |
|
|
|
µ∞s∞νε1 |
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
− |
|
|
|
µ∞s∞ |
+ 1 |
|
3 |
|
ε1 |
− µ∞s∞ |
+ 1 3 |
ε2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m1 |
|
|
γ (tγ |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
m2 |
|
γ (tγ ) . |
|
(112) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
The reverse operator has the form |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 − ν2 |
|
= |
|
|
|
|
s∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
1 + s1 |
|
(T γ ) + s2 |
|
|
(T γ ) + s3 |
(T γ ) . |
(113) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
γ∞s∞ + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Ee |
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
σ1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
σ2 |
|
3 |
σ3 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
e Tσ1 |
|
µ |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
, |
Tσ2 |
, and |
Tσ3 |
could be found from the following equation: |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
η1x |
|
|
+ |
|
η2x |
+ |
|
η3x |
|
= −1, |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
τεγ1 − x |
|
τεγ2 − x |
|
τεγ3 − x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
1 − η1 − η2 − η3 |
|
x3 + (τεγ2 + τεγ3) η1 + (τεγ3 + τεγ1) η2 + (τεγ1 + τεγ2) η3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
τ |
γ |
τ |
γ |
|
|
|
τ |
|
γ |
|
x + τ |
γ |
τ |
γ |
(1 |
|
|
η1) + τ |
γ |
τ |
γ |
|
(1 |
|
|
|
η2) + τ |
γ |
γ |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
− |
ε1 − |
|
|
|
|
− |
ε3 |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
− |
|
τε2(1 η3) x |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
ε2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ε2 |
|
ε3 |
|
|
|
|
ε3 |
|
ε1 |
|
|
|
ε1 γ γ |
−γ |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−τε1τε2 |
τε3 |
= 0, |
(114) |
where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
η1 = |
µ∞s∞νε1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
m1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m2 |
|
γ |
γ |
|
||||
|
, |
η2 = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
η3 = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
τε2 |
= tε1 |
, |
|||||
µ∞s∞ + 1 |
µ∞s∞ + |
1 |
|
|
µ∞s∞ + 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
and values s1, s2, and s3 are determined from following set of equations |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
s1τ γ |
|
+ |
|
s2τ |
γ |
|
|
+ |
|
s3τ |
γ |
|
= 1, |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ε1 |
|
|
|
ε1 |
|
|
|
ε1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
γ |
|
γ |
|
γ |
|
γ |
|
γ |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
τ |
|
|
−T |
|
|
τ |
|
−T |
|
|
|
τ |
|
|
−T |
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
ε1 |
|
σ1 |
|
|
ε1 |
|
|
σ2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
σ3 |
− |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
s1τεγ2 |
|
|
s2τεγ2 |
|
|
εs3τεγ2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
τ γ |
−T |
γ |
+ |
τ |
γ −T |
γ |
+ |
τ γ −T |
γ |
|
= 1, |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
ε2 |
|
σ1 |
|
|
ε2 |
|
|
σ2 |
|
|
ε2 |
|
|
σ3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
s1τε3 |
|
|
s2τε3 |
|
|
s3τε3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ |
|
γ |
|
|
γ |
|
|
γ |
+ |
|
γ |
|
|
γ |
|
= −1. |
|
|
|
|||||
Applying the Vi´ete |
τε3 |
−Tσ1 |
+ τε3−Tσ2 |
τε3−Tσ3 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
theorem to Eq. |
(114), we have |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ γ γ |
|
|
|
|
τεγ1τεγ2τεγ3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Tσ1Tσ2Tσ3 |
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 − η1 − η2 − η3 |
|
|
|
|
what completely corresponds to relationship (50) at n = 3.
τεγ3 = tγε2 ,
(115)
Complimentary Contributor Copy