Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4421_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
63 Мб
Скачать
29
476
R. Movahed and J. W. Ivory
. Fig. 29.3 Preoperative
photography shows retrognathia
and veried by the multidisciplinary team consisting of engineer, orthodontist, and surgeon. Once agreed upon by all parties, the intermediate, palatal, segmen­tal, and nal splints are printed from the virtual le and readied for shipment. The 3D prints are then shipped and received by the surgeon days prior to surgery and checked for defects.
29.4.1.7 Step 7: Procedure
On the day of surgery, surgeon is provided with splints provided by 3D systems and prostheses provided by TMJ Concepts. The fabricated splints are rechecked and cleared for use in the procedure operating theater. CTOS (TMJR and/or MMA) is then performed, without any necessity of lateral ramal shave.
29.4.1.8 Step 7: Follow-Up: Perioperative
Care, Transition toOce Visits, andFollow-Up Imaging
Following CTOS, the patient is moved to the intensive care for 48–72hours and then cleared for discharge if there are no extenuating complications. Telemedicine follow-ups are scheduled at regular intervals beginning upon discharge until the rst ofce visit.
29.4.2 Case 1: Symptomatic Idiopathic
Condylar Resorption
A male patient was followed from age 13 to 18 and referred by orthodontist in 2014 at the age of 15 for evaluation of TMJ pain, clicking, and popping accom-
panied with headaches. At the time of the rst visit, the patient was in full orthodontics and a conservative treatment of arthroscopy/arthrocentesis is completed. The patient continued follow-up with some increases in pain and progressing retrognathia noticeable during this pubertal period (. Fig. 29.3). Initial orthodon­tic treatment was completed within a year (completed at age of 15) with little symptom alleviation over that period. Throughout the patient’s growth period, pain was managed with dental splints and nonsteroidal anti- inammatories (NSAIDs). From 2014 to 2017, multiple arthroscopy/arthrocentesis procedures were performed to alleviate discomfort from additional dis­locations, jaw locks, and related pain. TMJ surgery was discussed as an option with the patient and fam­ily in annual follow- ups in 2015 and 2016. Because of the patient’s pain severity and progressing retrogna­thia of the skeletal morphology throughout puberty, the decision was made to proceed with CTOS with the objectives of achieving a functional airway and to restore the patient’s occlusion with optimal aesthetic harmonious positioning. Surgery planning was initi­ated when the patient was 17 years old (. Fig.29.4). Surgical risks were discussed and presurgical treat­ment education discussed requirements for periop­erative care. The patient was once again treated with orthodontics to regain level alignment prior to surgery (. Table 29.1). The virtual planning protocol was initiated to prepare for surgery as previously detailed (. Fig. 29.5). In 2017, the patient underwent sur­gery, which included reconstruction of custom-tted prosthesis, maxilla LeFort I counterclockwise rota-
a
Virtual Surgical Planning and Digital Workow for Concomitant Temporomandibular Replacement…
477
29
. Fig. 29.4 Presurgical planning
29
b
478
R. Movahed and J. W. Ivory
. Fig. 29.4 (continued)
Virtual Surgical Planning and Digital Workow for Concomitant Temporomandibular Replacement…
c
479
29
. Fig. 29.4 (continued)
29
R. Movahed and J. W. Ivory
480
. Table 29.1 Measurements
Point Name Anterior/Posterior Left/Right Up/Down
ANS Anterior Nasal Spine 2.36mm Anterior 2.80mm Left 3.57mm Up
A A Point 4.74mm Anterior 1.67mm Left 1.72mm Up
ISU1 Midline of Upper Incisor 9.50mm Anterior 0.25mm Left 2.00mm Up
U3L Upper Left Canine 8.37mm Anterior 0.02mm Right 0.93mm Down
U6L Upper Left Anterior Molar (mesiobuccal cusp) 7.00mm Anterior 0.67mm Right 5.96mm Down
U3R Upper Right Canine 10.24mm Anterior 0.11mm Right 1.36mm Up
U6R Upper Right Anterior Molar (mesiobuccal cusp) 9.54mm Anterior 0.75mm Right 2.63mm Down
ISL1 Midline of Lower Incisor 9.81mm Anterior 0.10mm Left 1.64mm Up
L6L Lower Left Anterior Molar (mesiobuccal cusp) 8.30mm Anterior 0.59mm Right 5.16mm Down
L6R Lower Right Anterior Molar (mesiobuccal cusp) 10.01mm Anterior 0.63mm Right 2.25mm Down
B B Point 14.04mm Anterior 1.67mm Right 0.94mm Down
Pog. Pogonion 25.38mm Anterior 4.75mm Right 0.28mm Up
. Fig. 29.5 Virtual
planning workow
ab
Virtual Surgical Planning and Digital Workow for Concomitant Temporomandibular Replacement…
481
29
. Fig. 29.6 Pre- and postsurgical CBCT images obtained and 1-year post-index procedure showing a minimal axial area improvement of
94mm2 preoperatively and increased to 151mm2 at 1-year post- index procedure
tion with skeletal xation, counterclockwise rotation performed concomitant with total joint replacement (TJR) (abdominal harvest of fat graft to TMJ), and genioplasty. Outcomes are shown in the postsurgical photographs and gures (. Figs.29.6 and 29.7). It is evident that the patient no longer has lip incompetence and function has been restored without any pain with a maximal incisal opening of 44mm, with facial har­mony regained. Upon follow-up, the patient reported that pain had subsided and headaches ceased.
29.4.3 Case 2: TMJ Pain andCondylar
Resorption
A 25-year-old woman with chronic TMJ pain was referred by the patient’s orthodontist after second orth­odontic relapse to the practice of Movahed OMS for evaluation. The patient had been diagnosed with TMD and idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) at the age of 23. The patient had undergone multiple orthodon­tic treatments since the age of 14. The patient had a history of eating difculty and discomfort, and often
required NSAID pharmacotherapy prior to eating (no signicant NSAID side effects reported). After refer­ral to Movahed OMS after second relapse for evalua­tion of TMJ pain and potential surgical correction, full orthodontics were once again initiated to level and align to prepare for surgery. The patient was diagnosed with ICR as the normal anatomy of the condyles was no longer recognizable. Preoperative photos show lip incompetence was evidence attributable to retrognathia of maxilla and mandible. Virtual surgical planning was performed in tandem with the patient to reinforce shared decision- making process, keeping the patient aware of all steps in the process. The patient underwent TMJR, MMA with counterclockwise rotation, and genioplasty approximately 1year after orthodontia at the age of 26. Maximal incisal opening gain was 41mm in postopera­tive physical therapy. Patient healed rapidly. Upon fol­low- up, joint function completely restored with no more lip incompetence. Facial balance and harmony achieved with good patient satisfaction. Although the patient required orthodontics 1year postoperatively, NSAIDs were no longer needed prior to meals (. Figs. 29.8,
29.9, 29.10, 29.10, and 29.11).
29
482
R. Movahed and J. W. Ivory
a
b
. Fig. 29.7 Preoperative (4weeks prior) and postsurgical (2months postoperatively) photographies
Virtual Surgical Planning and Digital Workow for Concomitant Temporomandibular Replacement…
483
29
. Fig. 29.8 Pre- and postoperative proles
29.4.4 Case 3
29.4.4.1 Case: Patient withJuvenile
Idiopathic Arthritis
A 15-year-old girl was referred to Movahed OMS for evaluation and management of TMJ pain and short­ness of breath from an oral surgeon, who noted that the patient’s airway was compromised. Notably, the patient also had a medical history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) diagnosed at age 7. TMJ symptoms and airway difculties were suspected to be caused by abso­lute destruction of normal joint anatomy and resultant severe retrognathia impeding the airway (. and 29.13). Patient had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)
Figs.29.12
of 21 and was diagnosed with OSA. After evaluation and imaging, multiple treatment options were discussed. Patient and family opted for TMJR to restore joint function and restore facial harmony to reverse sequelae of her pathology. Virtual surgical planning protocol was begun to prepare for the procedure (.
Table29.2).
A LeFort I advancement was performed with coun­terclockwise rotation and segmental osteotomy of the maxilla with uprighting of the anterior segment and expansion of the palate. TMJR was achieved with total joint prostheses from TMJ Concepts with abdominal fat harvested from abdomen and applied to the TMJs. Mandibular advancement was also performed in a coun­terclockwise fashion, as well as genioglossal advance­ment (.
Figs.29.14, 29.15, and 29.16).
29
484
R. Movahed and J. W. Ivory
. Fig. 29.9 Preoperative lateral cephalometry
a
Virtual Surgical Planning and Digital Workow for Concomitant Temporomandibular Replacement…
485
Preoperative Position
Intermediate Position
29
. Fig. 29.10 Postsurgical prole photographs
Final Position