Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4421_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
63 Мб
Скачать

Mandibular Surgical Procedures

LarryWolford
Contents
26.1 Genioplasty Procedures – 395
26.2 Osseous Genioplasty – 395
26.2.1 Anteroposterior Augmentation – 395
26.2.2 Surgical Procedure – 395
26.2.3 Anteroposterior Reduction – 396
26.2.4 Vertical Augmentation (Downgraft) – 397
26.2.5 Vertical Reduction – 397
26.2.6 Age forOsseous Genioplasty – 397
393
26
26.3 Alloplastic Augmentations – 397
26.3.1 Surgical Procedure – 398
26.4 Genioplasty Complications – 398
26.5 Mandibular Subapical Procedures – 399
26.5.1 Anterior Mandibular Subapical Osteotomy – 399
26.5.2 Age forSurgery – 399
26.5.3 Possible Complications – 400
26.6 Mandibular Body Surgery – 400
26.6.1 Eects onGrowth – 400
26.6.2 Age forSurgery – 400
26.7 Potential Complications forMandibular Body Surgery – 400
26.7.1 Nonunion or Malunion – 400
26.7.2 Loss ofTeeth andBone – 401
26.7.3 Infections – 401
26.7.4 Periodontal Defects – 401
26.7.5 Nerve Damage – 401
26.7.6 Simultaneous Mandibular Ramus andBody Procedures – 401
26.8 Mandibular Ramus Surgery – 401
26.8.1 The Wolford Inferior Border Osteotomy Modication oftheMandibular Ramus Sagittal Split Procedure – 402
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 K. B. Kim et al. (eds.), Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54146-0_26
26.8.2 Presence or Absence ofThird Molars – 406
26.8.3 Neurosensory Evaluation ofInferior Alveolar Nerve – 407
26.9 Vertical Ramus Osteotomy – 408
26.10 Mandibular Ramus Inverted L-Osteotomy – 409
26.10.1 Eects onGrowth – 409
26.10.2 Age atSurgery – 409
26.11 Complications ofMandibular Ramus Surgery – 410
26.11.1 Early Relapse – 410
26.11.2 Condylar Sag – 410
26.11.3 Temporomandibular Joint Hemarthrosis or Edema – 410
26.11.4 Unfavorable Splits or Fractures – 410
26.11.5 Extrusion ofTeeth – 410
26.11.6 Periodontal Defects – 411
26.11.7 Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction – 411
26.11.8 Nerve Injury – 411
26.11.9 Infections – 412
26.11.10 Nonunion – 412
26.11.11 Bleeding Problems – 412
References – 412
a
b
Mandibular Surgical Procedures
395
26
Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) commonly have associated mandibular deformities, particularly mandibular hypoplasia (retrusion) that can create a decreased oropharyngeal airway contributing to OSA. The OSA patient may present with a retruded mandible (often associated with a retruded maxilla and a high occlusal plane angle) that can displace the tongue posteriorly into the oropharyngeal space, severely com­promising the functional airway. OSA patients may ben­et from orthognathic surgery to advance the maxillomandibular complex forward, usually in a coun­terclockwise rotation direction that predictably increases the oropharyngeal airway. Although combined maxil­lary and mandibular osteotomies for advancement are usually required for correction of OSA involving a decreased oropharyngeal airway, this chapter focuses only on various mandibular osteotomies that may be incorporated in the management of the adolescent and adult OSA patient. Maxillary osteotomies are presented in another chapter. Also, mandibular distraction proce­dures are not addressed in this chapter. Particular atten­tion is directed to the mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy, as this is the primary osteotomy technique for advancing the mandible, so essential to predictable outcomes in the OSA patient.
The Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon should have experience with mandibular and maxillary procedures and a thorough understanding of reasonable treatment goals in order to develop a plan that provides optimal functional and aesthetic results [1]. The surgeon must be aware of the potential risks and complications that can occur with each of the mandibular procedures. This knowledge enables the surgeon to develop an optimal treatment plan and alternative treatments according to his or her skill level. The surgeon should communicate to the patient the existing problems, the magnitude of these problems, the recommended treatment, alternative treat­ment options, and the potential risks and complications.
The surgical procedures that will be described include the following:
1. Genioplasty
2. Subapical osteotomies
3. Body osteotomies
4. Ramus osteotomies

26.2 Osseous Genioplasty

When the bony chin is to be repositioned, a soft tissue pedicle must be maintained to ensure viability to the osteotomized segment. The traditional horizontal osteotomy (. Fig.26.1a) can be used and stabiliza­tion can be achieved by wiring, bone screws, and/or bone plates.
26.2.1 Anteroposterior Augmentation
OSA patients may benet from an osseous augmenta­tion genioplasty. Not only can the aesthetic benet occur, but advancing the chin will also increase tension on the supra-hyoid muscles that may have some posi­tive effect, although relatively minor, of pulling the base of the tongue further forward. The usual limiting factor for chin advancement is the anteroposterior dimension of the symphysis, unless the osteotomized segment is tiered surgically. If the chin is narrow trans­versely, advancement tends to make the face appear more tapered. A-P soft tissue change is approximately 80–85% of the amount of bony chin advancement
Fig.26.2a).
(.
26.2.2 Surgical Procedure
The surgical procedure involves an anterior vestibular incision from cuspid to cuspid, and reection of the mentalis muscles and periosteum off of the anterior and inferior border of the bony chin. A horizontal osteot­omy is performed generally starting 4–5mm below the mental foramen, at the inferior border, tapering forward to a level of 1–1 ½cm above bony menton. At this level, the genial tubercles and associated muscles remain attached to the distal segment providing a vascular sup­ply. Once the segment is mobilized and advanced, there are various methods to stabilize the segment, with the

26.1 Genioplasty Procedures

Genioplasty procedures can alter the position of the chin in all three planes of space. Chin position most commonly is changed by the use of a sliding horizontal osteotomy or by placement of an alloplastic implant. For OSA patients, an augmentation genioplasty may be indicated to advance the suprahyoid muscles, or enhance the facial balance.
. Fig. 26.1 a An osseous genioplasty can be used to augment the
chin, move it posteriorly, alter its vertical position, or change the transverse position of the chin. b Alloplastic implants can be used to augment the chin anteriorly and laterally
26
ac
bd
90%
396
L. Wolford
80%
80%
. Fig. 26.2 Soft tissue changes associated with genioplasty proce-
dures vary depending on the surgical method and direction of move­ment. a Bony augmentation genioplasty will change the soft tissue projection 80–85% of the amount of bony advancement. b Alloplas­tic augmentation to the chin will advance the soft tissues forward approximately 80–85% of the implant thickness. c Osseous genio-
most common using a chin bone plate, available in vari­ous lengths (3, 5, 7, and 9mm) that accommodates most chin advancement procedures (. Fig. 26.3). The inci­sion is closed in two layers, reattaching the mentalis muscles and then closing the mucosa.
plasty to position the chin posterior will result in approximately 90% soft tissue change relative to the amount of chin setback. d Vertical reduction of the chin by removing a bony wedge from above the horizontal genioplasty cut will create approximately a 90% vertical movement of the soft tissue relative to the amount of osseous verti­cal reduction
complex will render the chin too strong, requiring an A-P reduction genioplasty. The surgical approach is the same, but with repositioning the chin posteriorly. This may allow the tongue to settle posteriorly a minor amount. Optimal soft tissue change at pogonion is achieved by performing a horizontal sliding osteotomy and moving the chin and attached soft tissues posteri-
26.2.3 Anteroposterior Reduction
In some cases, the chin may be too strong and require reduction to maximize the aesthetic result. In redo orthognathic cases, sometimes a previous excessively advanced genioplasty was done as a compensatory aes­thetic procedure to increase the prominence of the chin, without properly correcting the dentofacial deformity and associated OSA.In this situation, the subsequent counterclockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular
orly. The chin usually appears wider after this proce­dure, and the labiomental fold decreases. Soft tissue change, if soft tissue remains attached to the anterior and inferior aspect of the chin, is usually 90% of the anteroposterior bony reduction (. Fig.26.2c). Shaving of the anterior aspect of the bony chin to reduce the A-P prominence may result in only 20–30% posterior movement of the soft tissue in relation to the amount of bone removed, as the soft tissues tend to thicken follow­ing this approach.
90%
Mandibular Surgical Procedures
397
26
a
. Fig. 26.3 a Specially designed chin plates can be used to support the advanced chin segment. The plates come in the sizes of 3, 5, 7, and
9mm lengths. b Lateral view of a 5mm chin advancement with a chin plate
26.2.4 Vertical Augmentation (Downgraft)
Vertical augmentation can be accomplished with a hor­izontal osteotomy and inferior repositioning of the chin segment, applying rigid xation. This technique usually requires bone or synthetic bone grafting between the proximal and distal segments. Vertical soft tissue change is approximately 100% of the osseous change.
26.2.5 Vertical Reduction
The most predictable method to vertically reduce the chin height is with a wedge resection and rotation of the inferior chin segment superiorly. When the soft tissue remains attached to the inferior border, the soft tissue change is approximately 90% of the vertical osseous change (. Fig.26.2d). If the vertical reduction is per­formed by resecting and removing the inferior border, then the vertical soft tissue change is only 25–30% of the amount of bone removed.
26.2.6 Age forOsseous Genioplasty
Osseous genioplasty is best performed after 12years of age to allow for eruption of the permanent mandibular canines and premolars to lessen possible damage to the roots.
b

26.3 Alloplastic Augmentations

Various synthetic materials have been used to augment the chin (. Fig.26.1b). Rigid stabilization of implants is important because mobility may result in malposi­tion, bone resorption, and infection. Most infections of chin implants occur when there is improper xation or inadequate soft tissue closure. The following recom­mended technique is safe and provides good long-term stability:
1. Perform the chin implant as the last step, after all other orthognathic procedures are completed and the associated incisions are closed.
2. After exposure and preparation of the implant area, thoroughly irrigate with sterile saline with a nal irrigation with betadine solution.
3. Change gloves and wash off glove powder before handling the implant.
4. Stabilize the implant to the mandible to eliminate mobility and migration by using bone screws, plates, or intraosseous wiring.
5. Irrigate the surgical area thoroughly, use a nal rinse of betadine, and close the incision in two layers with reapproximation of the mentalis muscle layer and tight mucosal closure.
Although many alloplastic materials have been used for chin augmentation, one currently recommended is Medpor (Porex, Newnan, GA); a porous polyethylene,
398
L. Wolford
26
preformed implant with a selection of sizes and designs (. Fig. 26.4a, b). It is recommended that alloplastic augmentation genioplasty be performed after eruption of the mandibular anterior teeth.
26.3.1 Surgical Procedure
The surgical procedure involves an anterior vestibular inci­sion from cuspid to cuspid, and reection of the mentalis muscles and periosteum off of the bony chin. The chin implant is contoured as necessary to provide the desired aesthetic result. It is inserted and stabilized with bone screws (. Fig.26.4c). The surgical area is thoroughly irri­gated with saline and a nal rinse of betadine solution. The incision is closed in two layers, reattaching the men­talis muscles and then a tight closure of the mucosa.
a

26.4 Genioplasty Complications

Several potential complications are associated with osseous and alloplastic chin augmentation:
5 Loss of osteotomized bone segment 5 Bone resorption 5 Infection 5 Loss of implant 5 Displacement/malalignment 5 Paresthesia/anesthesia of lower lip and chin 5 Lower lip ptosis 5 Mentalis muscle dysfunction 5 Unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome
Loss of the osteotomized bone segment may occur fol­lowing avascular necrosis. Avascular necrosis usually occurs because of loss of soft tissue attachment or infec-
b
c
. Fig. 26.4 a, b A Medpor chin implant to augment the chin ante-
riorly as well as enhance the lateral prole of the chin and mandible. c Chin implant in position stabilized with two bone screws. Soft tis-
sues require closure in two layers including resuspension and attach­ment of the mentalis muscle and watertight closure of the mucosal layer
a
b
Mandibular Surgical Procedures
tion. Loss of the segment may require further alloplastic or bone graft reconstruction. A large amount of bone resorption can be expected if a free bone graft is used to augment the chin or if the soft tissue pedicle to the mobilized chin segment is lost. Pedicled osseous genio­plasties usually undergo anterior bone resorption of about 10–20%. Infection most commonly is caused by avascular necrosis, contamination, and wound break­down. Displacement of the alloplast may occur follow­ing trauma or inadequate stabilization. This may require additional surgery to restabilize the implant. Lower lip ptosis may be caused by inadequate positioning, resus­pension, and stabilization of the mentalis muscle and associated soft tissues. Normally, when relaxed, the lower lip should be in level with the lower incisor edges. Correction of lower lip ptosis requires repositioning and resuspension of the mentalis muscles. Anesthesia or par­esthesia of the lower lip and chin may result from trauma to the inferior alveolar and/or mental nerve branches from incision design, dissection, retraction, or direct injury when performing osteotomies. Nerve injury may be avoided by careful incision placement, careful dissec­tion, minimal nerve retraction, and carefully planned bone cuts. If nerve transection is directly visualized, immediate repair is indicated.
399
26

26.5 Mandibular Subapical Procedures

These procedures are designed to alter portions of the mandibular dental alveolus and can be divided into three types: anterior, posterior, and total subapical osteoto­mies. Only the anterior subapical procedure will be dis­cussed here as it can be used to correct a malpositioned anterior dental segment such as an accentuated or reverse curve of Spee involving the anterior mandibular arch.
26.5.1 Anterior Mandibular Subapical
. Fig. 26.5 ubapical osteotomy. a, b Vertical interdental osteoto-
mies are performed with a connecting horizontal osteotomy or ostec­tomy positioned at least 5 mm below the apices of the teeth to minimize risk of dental devitalization. The segment can be stabilized with bone plates, interosseous screws, or wire xation
Osteotomy
Osteotomy design involves vertical interdental osteoto­mies joined by a horizontal osteotomy at least 5 mm below the apices of the associated teeth (. mandibular horizontal vestibular incision is used for
Fig.26.5). A
access. The vascularity to the mobilized segment is maintained by the lingual soft tissue pedicle. Indications for anterior mandibular subapical osteotomy include leveling the occlusal plane, changing the anteroposterior position of the mandibular anterior teeth, correcting asymmetries, and changing the axial angulation of the mandibular anterior teeth. Presurgery orthodontics may be required to diverge the roots of teeth adjacent to the vertical osteotomies to
minimize damage to the roots with the subsequent bone cuts. Bone screws, interosseous wiring, or bone plates can be used to stabilize the bone segments. Soft tissue closure is achieved by suturing the muscle layer rst to resuspend the lower lip and then a tight mucosal closure.
26.5.2 Age forSurgery
Although no studies refer to the vertical growth effects of interdental osteotomies, it is recommended that sur­gery be performed in females after the age of 14 and males after the age of 16.
26
a
400
L. Wolford
26.5.3 Possible Complications
Potential complications include root amputation, tooth ankylosis, periodontal defects, or loss of teeth and bone. Severe periodontal problems also may result from excessive removal of interdental bone. Major changes in vertical position may worsen preexisting periodontal problems in the area of vertical osteot­omy. Additional complications include lower lip par­esthesia/ anesthesia, lower lip ptosis, and pathological fracture. Anesthesia or paresthesia of the lip, teeth, and gingiva may result from trauma of the inferior alveolar or mental neurovascular bundle. This usually resolves in a few weeks to several months. If the neu­rological decit lasts longer than 1year, the prognosis for recovery is poor. If the nerve is severed, primary repair gives the best result. Teeth and gingiva in the subapical segment commonly exhibit an extended period of anesthesia or paresthesia.

26.6 Mandibular Body Surgery

b
Mandibular body surgery can be divided into anterior body and posterior body surgery. Anterior body sur­gery refers to osteotomies anterior to the mental fora­men, including the symphysis area. Posterior body surgery involves osteotomies around and adjacent to the mental foramen area or further posterior in the body (. Fig. 26.6). Posterior body surgery requires specic management of the inferior alveolar neuro­vascular bundle for its preservation. The basic indica­tions for mandibular body osteotomies are (1) occlusal plane leveling, (2) mandibular setback, (3) removal of edentulous space or teeth and associated bone, (4) narrowing or widening of the mandible, (5) lengthen­ing of the mandible, and (6) distraction osteogenesis. Contraindications include adjacent roots that are too close together and vascular compromise to adjacent
. Fig. 26.6 a Vertical body osteotomies or ostectomies can be per-
formed in any area of the mandible to move the anterior segment of the mandible posteriorly or to alter the vertical and transverse posi­tion. Combining body osteotomies and sagittal split osteotomies of the ramus allows exibility in movement of the posterior and ante­rior segments independent of each other. b Rigid xation improves the stability and facilitates healing
soft tissue and bone. Perform the osteotomies so that there will be maximum bony interface following the repositioning of the segments. A signicant bony gap
26.6.2 Age forSurgery
created by the removal of too much bone may inter­fere with healing. Precise treatment planning in the model surgery and the prediction tracing is para-
This surgery is recommended after the age of 14 in females and after age 16in males.
mount for success in body osteotomies. Rigid xation is preferred for stabilization of the segments.
26.7 Potential Complications
forMandibular Body Surgery
26.6.1 Eects onGrowth
Interdental osteotomies should not affect vertical alveo­lar growth, unless a tooth root is injured, resulting in dental ankylosis, which could result in decient vertical dentoalveolar growth.
26.7.1 Nonunion or Malunion
Nonunion or malunion usually results from a poor bony interface, inaccurate position of the bony segments, or inadequate stabilization of the segments. Nonunion or
Mandibular Surgical Procedures
401
26
malunion may necessitate additional surgery to reposi­tion and stabilize the segments and rigid xation, with or without bone grafting.
26.7.2 Loss ofTeeth andBone
The loss of teeth and bone may occur because of vascu­lar compromise, resulting in infection, osteomyelitis, or avascular necrosis. Vascular insufciency can be devas­tating and may require hyperbaric oxygen treatment and secondary procedures that restabilize or reconstruct the bone segments.
26.7.3 Infections
Infection or osteomyelitis may require antibiotics and debridement. Infection is rare unless there is major dam­age done to the bone, teeth, and soft tissues during sur­gery. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy may be required as well as secondary reconstruction.
26.7.4 Periodontal Defects
Periodontal defects may occur as a result of vascular compromise, inadvertent removal of the cervical inter­dental bone, or major damage to the periodontal tissues. Defects also may occur by creating tears or vertical incisions in the osteotomy area.
26.7.5 Nerve Damage
Anesthesia or paresthesia of the lower lip, chin, and gums are the most common complications of mandibu­lar body surgery. Generally, neurosensory decit is tem­porary but can be permanent. Nerve damage usually is caused by edema and manipulation of the neurovascular bundle. In an anterior body ostectomy, where the ante­rior branch of the inferior alveolar nerve is sacriced, the anterior teeth and gingiva may be numb for many months or permanently. If a major inferior alveolar or mental nerve injury is encountered during the surgery, immedi­ate repair is indicated for the most predictable outcome.
26.7.6 Simultaneous Mandibular Ramus
andBody Procedures
Simultaneous ipsilateral mandibular body and ramus procedures can be accomplished provided that the soft tissues are managed appropriately. Maintaining the
integrity of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle, particularly in posterior segments, is important. Careful management and protection of the lingual tissues is also vital. When mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomies are performed concomitant with mandibular body pro­cedures, it is generally recommended to complete the sagittal split procedure before the body osteotomies. If the body osteotomies are performed rst, even with rigid xation, the prying forces necessary to complete the sag­ittal split may displace the body segments. If vertical oblique, or inverted L osteotomies are performed along with body osteotomies, either procedure may be com­pleted rst. Once the ramus and body osteotomies are completed, the occlusal splint can be used to align the segments appropriately for stabilization, preferably by rigid xation. The body osteotomies are stabilized with rigid xation rst followed by the ramus rigid xation.

26.8 Mandibular Ramus Surgery

Mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy is the most common mandibular orthognathic procedure for the OSA patient. This osteotomy technique originally was described by Trauner and Obwegeser in 1957 [24]. The bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy can be used for mandibular advancement or setback, correction of moderate asymmetries, control of the occlusion, and positioning of the condyle. The technique has under­gone numerous modications [510]. The procedure to be described herein, maximizes the bony interface by splitting the mandible at the inferior border, provides controlled positioning of the proximal segment and easy application of rigid xation. (. Fig. 26.7) [11]. Even with large advancements, bone grafting rarely is required.
Indications for sagittal split ramus osteotomies
include mandibular advancement, setback, and correc­tion of mandibular asymmetries. Contraindications for mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy include severe decreased posterior mandibular body height, extremely thin medial-lateral width of ramus, severe ramus hypoplasia, absence of a condyle, and severe asymmetries.
Advantages include the following:
1. Healing is enhanced because of a good bony inter­face.
2. Can advance or set back the mandible, correct most asymmetries, and alter the occlusal plane, enabling counterclockwise rotation advancement of the max­illomandibular complex for the OSA patient.
3. Rigid xation can be applied, eliminating the need for maxillomandibular xation. Rigid xation, when properly applied, signicantly improves the stability and predictability of results. Bone plates with mono-
26
402
L. Wolford
. Fig. 26.7 Outline of the Wolford modication of the mandibular
ramus sagittal split osteotomy. Green Arrow: Horizontal cut made 8–10mm below the alveolar bone crest. Red Arrow: Horizontal oste­otomy extends 8 mm longer than the amount of mandibular advancement to provide a bony interface between the proximal and distal segments
cortical screws or bicortical bone screws can provide good stability.
4. Surgical modications can maintain the angle of the mandible in the original spatial position, even in large advancements.
5. The muscles of mastication remain in their original spatial position.
Disadvantages include the following:
1. The incidence of nerve damage is increased com­pared to other techniques (i.e., vertical ramus oste­otomies, inverted “L” osteotomies), although this is usually temporary.
2. Unfavorable splits may occur increasing difculty with stabilizing.
3. Surgery must create a fracture on the lingual aspect of the ramus.
4. Severe asymmetries are more challenging to correct.
26.8.1 The Wolford Inferior Border
Osteotomy Modication ofthe Mandibular Ramus Sagittal Split Procedure
This modication of the sagittal split procedure may address a number of the unfavorable features associated with the traditional osteotomy designs. This technique incorporates an inferior border osteotomy into the sag-
. Fig. 26.8 Medial side of the ramus shows the position of the
medial horizontal cut just above the lingula as well as the medial fracture line
ittal split design and provides a method to reposition the mandible with an effective means for easier splitting, greater advancement capabilities, decreased IAN involvement, positional control of the condyle and proximal segment, and easy application of rigid xation [11]. The technique will be described.
1. The mandible is approached through an incision along the ascending ramus, extended forward to the rst molar area, or further for larger mandibular advancements.
2. The medial monocortical osteotomy is performed through the lingual cortex just above the lingula, extending posterior to the lingula and mandibular foramen, using a short Lindenman bur (.
Fig.26.8).
3. After initiating the vertical ramus cut with a #701 ssure bur, a thin bladed reciprocating saw is used to perform the osteotomy down the ascending ramus, adjacent to the buccal cortex, stopping just distal to the second molar (. Fig. 26.9, yellow arrows).
4. A horizontal monocortical osteotomy is made with a #701 ssure bur, directed perpendicular to the buccal cortex, 8–10 mm below the alveolar crest (. Fig. 26.9, green arrow, . Fig. 26.10), and is extended anteriorly 8mm greater than the amount of intended mandibular advancement (. Fig.26.9, red arrow). This cut subsequently creates a bony ledge on the distal segment that provides a vertical stop to control the position of the proximal seg-