Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4421_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
63 Мб
Скачать
362
L. Wolford
24
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most important tools available to the oral and maxillofa­cial surgeon for diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. However, it is estimated that 40–60% of TMJ MRIs are misread by radiologists. Therefore, it is very important for the oral and maxillofacial surgeon to be able to inter­pret TMJ MRIs. This chapter incorporates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into the diagnostic evalu­ation of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients that also have temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology. TMJ pathology may coexist with the dentofacial defor­mity or may be the etiology of the jaw deformity that is responsible for creating the OSA.This chapter will pres­ent the MRI ndings of the common TMJ pathologies associated with OSA.TMJ pathologies associated with mandibular condylar hyperplasia, benign, or malignant tumors will not be discussed, as they do not contribute to OSA.
One of the primary factors contributing to sleep apnea is a decreased oropharyngeal airway. Using lat­eral cephalometric analysis, the normal A-P dimension of the oropharyngeal airway from the posterior pha­ryngeal wall to the soft palate and posterior pharyngeal wall to the base of the tongue should be 11mm, plus or minus 2mm. OSA patients commonly have a high occlusal plane angle facial morphology that includes a retruded mandible and maxilla as well as a decreased oropharyngeal airway. A normal occlusal plane angle to the Frankfort horizontal plane is 8 degrees, plus or minus 4 degrees, but OSA patients commonly have a signicantly increased occlusal plane angle. There is a triad of factors that are commonly observed in OSA patients, and they include: (1) high occlusal plane angle facial morphology associated with retruded maxilla and mandible, (2) nasal airway obstruction related to hyper­trophied turbinates and/or nasal septal deviation or spurring, and (3) TMJ pathology. Patients with the high occlusal plane angle facial morphology should routinely be assessed for nasal airway obstruction, decreased oro­pharyngeal airway, and TMJ pathology.
For many OSA patients, the most highly predict­able surgical treatment is to advance the maxilla and mandible in a counterclockwise direction [14], which opens up the oropharyngeal airway signicantly [510]. The counterclockwise rotation of the maxillomandibu­lar complex usually provides the best facial aesthetic balance while maximizing the increase of the oropha­ryngeal airway dimensions. The traditional method of straightforward or clockwise advancement of the max­illa and mandible that most surgeons perform may com­promise the esthetic outcome and decrease the potential increase of the oropharyngeal airway.
Many OSA patients have TMJ issues that need to be surgically addressed in order for the orthognathic surgery
to be successful and provide a stable, predictable out­come. Preexisting TMJ pathology, if ignored, can result in postsurgery condylar resorption and mandibular relapse with skeletal instability, malocclusion, pain, and decrease of the oropharyngeal airway that was achieved from the orthognathic surgery [1121]. As the maxillary and mandibular complex is advanced forward in a coun­terclockwise direction in the presence of healthy TMJs or surgically corrected TMJs, the overall facial balance is predictably improved, skeletal and occlusal stability is established, jaw function is enhanced, the oropharyn­geal airway is opened, and pain is eliminated.
To evaluate the presence or absence of TMJ pathol­ogy, radiographic evaluation is very helpful in the diag­nostic process and cone-beam CT (CBCT) technology makes accessibility to low-cost, low-radiation CT scans, but are primarily methods to evaluate hard-tissue struc­tures. MRI allows evaluation of hard and soft tissues of the TMJ, such as condyle, fossa, and disc position, mor­phology, mobility, extent of joint bone and soft-tissue degenerative changes, inammation, condylar resorp­tion, tumors, and connective tissue/autoimmune dis­eases [22, 23]. Additional imaging such as panograms, cephalometric radiographs, CT scans, CBCT scans, bone scans, 3D imaging, and 3D modeling may also be indicated for some OSA patients.
MRIs can help in the diagnosis of TMJ pathology in the silent joint where disc displacement and degen­erative changes can be present but may not make noise and may not be particularly uncomfortable or painful, and therefore, clinicians often ignore the TMJ issues. If untreated in a patient requiring orthognathic surgery for maxillary/mandibular advancement (MMA) with or without counterclockwise rotation (CCWR) to cor­rect OSA, surgery could result in a poor outcome rela­tive to function, skeletal and occlusal stability, airway, and pain. The MRI provides a method to identify these patients and the associated TMJ pathologies.
Dr. Raymond Damadian is credited with the development of the MRI imaging technology, and on July 3, 1977, the rst human MRI exam was per­formed. Superconducting magnets from 1.5 to 3.0 tesla (15,000–30,000 gauss) are required to achieve the imag­ing. Interestingly, the earth’s magnetic eld is equal to
0.5gauss. There are radiofrequency coils that transmit waves into the body. Superconducting magnets align the protons head to feet. The radiofrequency magnets change the rotation of the protons causing resonance at Larmor frequency. There are three gradient magnets within the machine that create the image slices. The sig­nals generated are picked up by special TMJ coils and sent to a computer, and Fourier transform formula maps the tissues and then integrates into 2D or 3D images. Contrast materials can be injected as normal and abnor­mal tissues will react differently. There are no known
MRI Evaluation forPatients withTMJ Disorders andObstructive Sleep Apnea
363
24
biological hazards; however, it is not recommended dur­ing pregnancy. Dangers include magnetic coding will be erased from such devices as credit cards, etc. Pacemakers may malfunction. Aneurysm clips in the brain could move, and magnetic materials around or in the patient can cause serious or life-threatening damage.
MRI requirements for TMJ imaging include the fol-
lowing:
1. A closed 1.5–3.0 tesla MRI machine.
2. TMJ coils are highly recommended to enhance the imaging. The coils, particularly in the lower grade machines (1.5 tesla), will signicantly enhance the imaging. Without the coils, the imaging may be unreadable and nondiagnostic.
3. MRI is best done prior to the application of orth­odontic appliances as the metal devices can create dis­tortion and interference of the TMJ anatomy, although in the presence of orthodontic appliances, an adequate MRI of the TMJ can usually be acquired. However, the more metal that may be associated with the orthodontic appliances and additional nonremov­able metal devices, the greater the risk of interference of the MRI imaging. Any metal orthodontic appli­ances or devices must be nonmagnetic.
The recommended TMJ views for adequate MRI inter­pretation include the following:
1. Coronal Closed Views– in centric relation, maximum closure, without splints.
2. Sagittal Closed Views– in centric relation, maximum closure, without splints.
3. Sagittal Open Views– with maximum jaw opening.
4. Sagittal Dynamic Views– from a slight open position (to accommodate the ratchet device) to maximum open position. The dynamic views are often helpful in determining the point at which the displaced discs may or may not reduce mobility of the condyle and disc, presence of adhesions, etc. However, it is impor­tant to understand that the “dynamic” views are not acquisitioned with the patient’s normal voluntary jaw opening. On the contrary, the opening is achieved with the patient in a supine position using an open­ing ratchet device placed between the maxillary and mandibular incisors. This opens the bite to accom­modate the device so that the dynamic imaging begins with the jaws slightly open, unless the patient has an anterior open bite. The device opens the jaw in increments with MRI data recorded at each incre­ment of opening until the maximum opening is achieved with the device still in place. The MRI data gathered at the various increments are integrated to appear as a continuous motion from the slight open position to maximum opening. This may or may not duplicate the patients normal jaw function when the patient is in an upright position.
In the MRI, different tissues are contrasted dependent of the tissue properties (proton density), and the pulse sequence parameters are usually dened as a T1- or T2-weighted image. In general, T1 images are helpful in identifying disc position, the presence of alteration in bone and soft-tissue structures, and interrelationships of the bony and soft-tissue anatomy. T2 MRI images are more helpful in identifying inammatory responses in the TMJ.The importance of disc position cannot be overemphasized, and the MRI is the best diagnostic tool to determine disc position, TMJ pathology, quality, and salvageability of the disc and condyle, as well as will dictate the treatment protocol, particularly if surgery is indicated.
With a normal healthy TMJ (. Fig.24.1), the con-
dyle should have a uniform shape and consistent thick­ness of cortical bone. The condyle should be positioned in the fossa with equal joint space between the condyle and fossa posteriorly, superiorly, and anteriorly. The articular disc should sit on top of the condyle with the posterior band at about the 12 o’clock position. The disc should have a bowtie shape with increased thickness of the posterior band and anterior band and a thinner area for the intermediate zone. The articular eminence should have a moderate inclination, although the articular emi­nence may be quite variable in steepness. There should be no joint effusion, inammation, or synovitis evident. On opening, the condyle and disc should translate down and forward as a unit beneath the articular eminence. The MRI imaging can be correlated to CBCT and CT scan imaging of the TMJs for joint space and greater interpretation of bony pathology.

24.1 TMJ Articular Disc Displacement

The most common type of disc displacement is anterior as seen in . Fig.24.2a. The posterior band of the disc is anterior to the condylar head. When opening, the disc may (. Fig.24.2b) or may not reduce. Upon reduction, there is usually a palpable and sometimes audible pop in the joint as the head of the condyle comes downward and forward over the back end of the posterior band as the condyle reduces onto the disc (. The mandible may then open the rest of the way with a normal condyle–disc relationship. Upon closing, the condyle may slide back off the posterior band of the disc, making a reciprocal closing click. As TMJ disease progresses, on opening the disc may not reduce back in position creating a silent joint, as the disc remains anterior throughout jaw function. Displacement of the articular disc can initiate a cascade of events leading to arthritis.
The anteriorly displaced disc may eventually become
deformed and nonreducing but still be mobile, or
Fig. 24.2b).
24
ab
364
L. Wolford
. Fig. 24.1 MRI sagittal view of a normal healthy TMJ. a The
joint space is equal posterior, superior, and anterior with the poste­rior band of the disc at 12 o’clock position relative to the condyle.
become adherent to the articular eminence and/or fossa
The condyle has a smooth regular contour. b On opening, the con­dyle and disc translate down and forward as a unit beneath the artic­ular eminence
24.1.1 Silent TMJ withDisc Displacement
limiting the translation abilities of the condyle and disc creating the “closed lock” phenomenon (. Fig.24.2c). It is not uncommon to see a lateral rotational disc dis­placement where the disc may be anteriorly displaced at the lateral aspect of the joint, but toward the medial, the disc is in a more normal position, thus the importance of the evaluation of sagittal MRI views from lateral to medial in a sequential fashion. Since the lateral attach­ment of the disc to the condyle is weaker compared to the medial attachment, the disc more commonly can dis­place at the lateral aspect of the joint initially and then progress toward the medial side. This also can cause the disc to displace medially, so the disc becomes anterome­dially displaced.
Medial displacement of the disc can occur where
the disc is dislocated to the medial aspect of the joint and lacks coverage of the lateral portion of the con­dyle. There is typically a decreased lateral joint space, more evident on the coronal view (. Fig.24.3a). This can result in a condition called lateral capsular impinge­ment, where the disc displaces medially and the capsule is pulled over between the lateral pole and the fossa, which can create pain issues. Discs can also be displaced laterally (. Fig. 24.3b), but this is less common than anterior and/or medial displacement. There is a break­down of the attachment at the medial pole, and the disc is displaced lateral to the condyle and can cause pain and dysfunction.
There are a number of TMJ pathological processes where the disc is displaced, but yet, the disc is silent with function. An MRI can determine the following silent joint disorders: (1) anterior displaced disc that does not reduce on opening (. Fig.24.4a, b); (2) steep articular eminence where the articular disc is anteriorly displaced, but in a vertical orientation so that upon opening, there is an immediate reduction of the disc as it is in a “pre­click” position (. Fig. 24.5a); (3) medial or lateral disc displacements (. Fig.24.3a, b); (4) certain patho­logical conditions such as adolescent internal condylar resorption (AICR) where there may be thickening of the bilaminar tissues so that there is a smooth transi­tion from the thickened bilaminar tissue onto the dis­placed disc (.
Fig.24.5b); (5) long-term splint therapy
with downward and forward posturing of the mandibu­lar condyle with thickening of the bilaminar tissues so that there is a smooth transition onto the disc (similar to . Fig. 24.5b); and (6) Class II mechanics that may articially pull the condyle down and forward onto the disc, but in an unstable position relative to the condylar centric relation.
When discs are anteriorly displaced for an extended time period, the discs may become deformed with loss of the intermediate zone and thickening of the posterior and anterior bands with progressive arthritis, render­ing the discs and possibly the condyles nonsalvageable
MRI Evaluation forPatients withTMJ Disorders andObstructive Sleep Apnea
365
24
a
c
b
. Fig. 24.2 a In the closed position, the condyle is positioned pos-
terior in the fossa and the disc is anteriorly displaced with the poste­rior band at about the 10 o’clock position. b On opening, the disc reduces into a normal position. c The disc is severely deformed and
(. Fig.24.2c). Also, there may be a degenerative pro­cess developing in the discs where there is a breakdown of the cartilaginous substance with vascular invasion and degeneration. When discs advance to a certain level of deformation and degeneration, they become nonsal­vageable. When discs are displaced and nonreducing, the deformation and degenerative processes progress more rapidly as compared to displaced discs that reduce. Bony degenerative changes occur as well. An MRI will help determine the degree and progression of the degen-
anteriorly displaced. On opening, the disc will not reduce. If the disc becomes adhered to the articular eminence, it can cause a “closed lock” situation
erative and deformation changes to the joint structures and indicate the corrective surgical procedures that will provide the most predictable outcome for each patient’s specic presentation. When discs are salvageable, a sur­gical option is to reposition and stabilize the disc into a normal position with a Mitek bone anchor and arti­cial ligaments (Mitek anchor technique) (.
Fig.24.6)
[2433]. For success of this technique, specic criteria must be met. The MRI is strategic in determining if this technique will be benecial.
366
L. Wolford
24
ab
. Fig. 24.3 a MRI coronal view demonstrates a medially displaced articular disc. Notice the decreased vertical joint space toward the lat-
eral aspect of the fossa. b Coronal view demonstrates lateral displacement of the articular disc. Medial joint space may be narrowed
a
. Fig. 24.4 a Sagittal view of an anteriorly displaced disc. Green
arrows identify the disc and “C” indicates the condyle. b In the open view, the condyle translates forward beneath the articular eminence,
b
but the disc remains anteriorly displaced without reduction. Green arrows identify the disc and “C” indicates the condyle
MRI Evaluation forPatients withTMJ Disorders andObstructive Sleep Apnea
a b
367
24
. Fig. 24.5 a Sagittal view with the white arrow pointing to the
posterior band of the disc that is anteriorly displaced but in a verti­cal orientation. The red arrow points to the condyle–disc interface. As the mandible is opened, there is a smooth transition between the condyle and disc rendering an opening without a click or pop. This is a silent joint with a displaced disc, but can cause pain and dysfunc­tion. b There is signicant thickening of the bilaminar tissues in this
. Fig. 24.6 Mitek anchor
technique. a The disc is anteriorly displaced (green arrow). The bilaminar tissue on top of the condyle is excised and the disc is mobilized. b The disc is repositioned over top of the condyle. The Mitek anchor is inserted into the posterior head, and articial ligaments (0-Ethibond suture) are used to secure the disc in position. c Illustrates the Mitek anchor and the placement of two 0-Ethibond sutures through the eyelet that will act as articial ligaments. d Posterior view of the condyle showing the insertion of the Mitek anchor lateral to the mid sagittal plane and the placement of the sutures (articial ligaments) through the posterior aspect of the posterior band of the disc to secure it in position
a
c
Mitek mini anchor
0-Ethibond suture
TMJ with AICR.The thickening of the bilaminar tissues can occur with certain pathologies as well as long-term splint therapy. A thick­ened bilaminar tissue can result in a smooth transition of the con­dyle onto the disc rendering a silent joint. The red arrows identify the position of the disc and “C” indicates the condyle. The distance between the head of the condyle and the fossa identies the hyper­plastic bilaminar and synovial tissues
b
d
1.8 × 5 mm
Mitek anchor
Posterior view
368
L. Wolford
24
24.1.2 Criteria forArticular Disc
Repositioning withtheMitek Anchor Technique
1. Anterior, medial, or lateral disc displacement.
2. Fouryears or less since initial disc displacement.
3. Salvageable disc and condyle.
4. No other joints involved (no polyarthritis).
5. No reactive arthritis.
6. No connective tissue/autoimmune disease.
7. No intracapsular adhesions.
8. No history of recurrent infections, such as sexually transmitted diseases; upper respiratory or pulmonary infections; urinary tract infections; genital infections or history of endometriosis or other gynecological pathologies; gastrointestinal problems such as irri­table bowel syndrome, GERD, and Crohn’s disease; and eye infections. These conditions can cause a reac­tive arthritis, where patients may not do well, even with an ideal surgical disc repositioning as the patho­logical process may continue to progress postsurgery.
24.1.3 Implications fortheOSA Patient
is some distortion of the MRI imaging because of the metal anchor in the head of the condyle, but the reduced position of the disc is noted.
OSA patients that fall out of the criteria for disc repositioning will benet from custom-tted total joint prostheses [8, 3455] where the prostheses are used to reconstruct the TMJ as well as advance the mandible for MMA (.
Fig.24.8). Virtual surgical planning (VSP)
In OSA patients that have TMJ disc displacement, but meet the criteria for disc repositioning, and if the pro­cedure is properly performed prior to or concomitant with MMA with or without CCWR, surgical treatment should provide skeletal and occlusal stability, improved jaw function, signicant decrease or elimination of pain, and improved dimension of the oropharyngeal airway. Postsurgical MRI sagittal view of a repositioned disc with a Mitek anchor is seen in . Fig.24.7. There
ab
.Fig. 24.7 MRI demonstrates the position of the articular disc over
top of the condyle, secured by the Mitek anchor and articial ligaments. The Mitek anchor creates some image distortion because of the metal content. The articular disc is the ideal position relative to the condyle
. Fig. 24.8 a Preparation of the stereolithic model for a patient
undergoing bilateral TMJ total joint prostheses reconstruction and maxillary osteotomies for counterclockwise rotation and advance­ment of the maxillomandibular complex. The condyle has been removed, and a 20mm gap has been created to accommodate the
prosthesis. Coronoidectomy must also be performed in order to achieve the counterclockwise rotation. b TMJ concepts custom­tted total joint prostheses have been manufactured to t this patient’s specic anatomical requirements with the jaws repositioned to achieve the nal desired result
MRI Evaluation forPatients withTMJ Disorders andObstructive Sleep Apnea
369
24
has improved the accuracy and the projected surgical outcome and the custom adaptation of the prostheses to each patient’s specic anatomical requirements [49,
5659]. With orthognathic surgery only, without cor-
rective TMJ surgery, the negative effects that can occur include development or worsening of TMJ pain, myo­fascial pain, headaches, ear symptoms, etc. There is an 84% chance of developing pain postsurgery and a signicant increase of the postsurgical pain level (84% increase) compared to presurgery. There is a risk (30%) that condylar resorption can occur postsurgery [11].
24.2 Adolescent Internal Condylar
Resorption (AICR)
Adolescent internal condylar resorption (AICR) has a relatively classic MRI presentation. This hormonally mediated condition is initiated usually between the ages of 11 and 15years and predominantly in females (ratio 8:1 females to males); there is no genetic predisposition; only the TMJ joints are involved with no other joints affected; discs are anteriorly displaced; condyles pro­gressively decrease in size; and the mandible is retruded. Following the onset of the process, the rate of condy­lar resorption is about 1.5mm per year. The mandible will slowly retrude into a Class II occlusal and skeletal relationship with a tendency toward anterior open bite. These patients all have high occlusal plane angle facial morphological proles [6063].
MRIs of these cases present with a condyle that is slowly becoming smaller in size in all three planes of space. In some cases, there is a signicant thinning of the
cortical bone on top of the condyle contributing to the inward collapse of the condylar head in this pathological process (. Fig.24.9). Interestingly, the brocartilage on the condylar head and in the fossa remains intact. This is the only form of condylar resorption where the bro­cartilage remains intact. The articular discs are anteri­orly displaced and may or may not reduce on opening. Nonreducing discs will degenerate and deform at a more rapid rate as compared to discs that reduce.
24.2.1 Implications fortheOSA Patient
Treatment considerations for OSA patients with AICR usually require MMA with or without CCWR includ­ing disc repositioning with Mitek anchor versus total joint prostheses. Consideration for disc repositioning with Mitek anchors follows the guidelines previously described for TMJ disc displacement. Our studies [6063] demonstrate that AICR can be arrested if the articular discs are put back into position on top of the condyle and stabilized with the Mitek anchor technique (.
Fig.24.6) [2433]. Results are best for AICR if the
TMJ surgery is performed within 4 years of the onset of the TMJ pathology. After 4years, the discs may not be salvageable. Patients that fall outside of these criteria will be candidates for total joint prostheses [8, 3459], resulting in a signicantly greater outcome predictabil­ity relative to stability, improved function, and airway, as well as decrease in pain.
OSA patients that have AICR undergoing MMA without appropriate TMJ surgically management will have predictably unstable skeletal and occlusal out-
ab
. Fig. 24.9 a MRI of TMJ AICR. The disc is anteriorly displaced.
Notice the thinning of the cortical bone on top of the condyle and the loss of condylar vertical dimension. The disc is anteriorly dis-
placed (red arrow). b On opening, the articular disc commonly remains anteriorly displaced without reduction (red arrow) in AICR
370
L. Wolford
24
comes because of the condylar resorption. A common approach of many surgeons is to follow the patient until the “condylar resorption burns-out” and then per­form the MMA with clockwise rotation of the MMA by increasing the occlusal plane even greater than the already high occlusal plane angulation. However, with MMA, the TMJs will have increased loading and could reinitiate the condylar resorption process. Additional negative effects of MMA on this patient population may result in development or worsening TMJ pain, myofascial pain, headaches, ear symptoms, etc. Also, the amount of advancement required to correct the OSA would dictate that the maxilla would need to be advanced a greater amount in order to advance the mandible enough to open the oropharyngeal airway creating major and unaesthetic compromises in the facial appearance. Additional surgery may be required that would include total joint prostheses (. Fig.24.8) and repeat orthognathic surgery to correct the original failed surgery, as well as MMA and CCWR to correct the TMJ pathology, restore facial balance, increase the oropharyngeal airway, and eliminate residual pain.

24.3 Reactive Arthritis (ReA)

such as tissue necrosis factor alpha, nitric oxide, cyto­kines, chemokines, and interleukins (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8), and may be the primary source of pain experienced by many TMJ patients [1, 68]. Currently, there are no pre­dictable nonsurgical treatments to eliminate this TMJ pathology although some promising techniques may be developing.
MRI of ReA may initially show a localized area of uid effusion, inammation, and synovitis, with or with­out disc displacement and with or without erosion of the condyle and/or fossa. As the disease progresses, it can present as a more profuse inammatory process sur­rounding the disc and through the bilaminar tissues and capsule (. Fig. 24.10). The ReA can cause signicant destruction of the TMJ structures. The MRI may show the presence of disc displacement as well as joint effu­sion, synovitis, and inammation with the soft tissues in association with condylar degeneration that can include resorption. However, in low-grade inammatory condi­tions, bone deposition may occur on the condyle and fossa that could lead to osteophytes, heterotopic bone deposition, and ankylosis (.
24.3.1 Implications fortheOSA Patient
Fig.24.11).
Reactive arthritis (ReA), or seronegative spondyloar­thropathy, is an inammatory disease in joints usually caused by venereal and respiratory bacteria. ReA is one of the most common forms of arthritis, but least understood. In the TMJ, ReA commonly develops in the late- teens through the fourth decade, predominately in females, and can cause TMJ pain, arthritis, and condylar resorption. Systemic symptoms of ReA may include joint pain, fever, fatigue, back pain, degenera­tive joint disease, polyarthritis, and dysfunction of the immune system. The most common bacteria that cause ReA are from two genera: chlamydia and mycoplasma. The specic species identied contributory to knee and TMJ ReA include C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae, C.
psittaci, M. genitalium, M. pneumoniae, and M. fermen­tans [6475].
The plausible theory for chlamydia- and myco­plasma-induced TMJ ReA begins with a triggering infectious site established elsewhere in the body that is often asymptomatic. Host cells such as macrophages and monocytes become infected. When an injury or inammatory reaction occurs in the TMJ, the host cells respond, transport the bacteria through the hemopoietic system, inltrate the synovial and bilaminar tissues, and colonize the bacteria; the TMJ infection is initiated; and bone and cartilage degeneration begins, as well as the production of pain. Chlamydia and mycoplasma bac­teria stimulate pro-inammatory and pain mediators,
Surgical options to treat ReA include arthroscopy and arthrocentesis that may reduce symptoms temporarily but will not eliminate the bacteria. Open joint debride­ment and disc repositioning may be effective in the very early stages, but will be ineffective with more advanced disease. The most predictable TMJ treatment option for OSA patients with ReA requiring MMA is custom­tted total joint prostheses to reconstruct the TMJs and advance the mandible in conjunction with the MMA with CCWR (. Fig.24.8) [8, 3459]. This approach will usually provide the best outcome predictability relative to skeletal and occlusal stability, improved jaw function, increased the airway dimension, decreased pain, and maximized facial balance.
OSA patients that have ReA undergoing MMA with or without CCWR, and without appropriate TMJ surgically management, may have predictably unstable skeletal and occlusal outcomes if the ReA has caused presurgery condylar resorption or the surgery initi­ates the resorption. A common approach of many sur­geons is to follow the patient until “condylar resorption burns- out” and then perform the MMA.However, the MMA will load the TMJs and could reinitiate the con­dylar resorption process. Additional negative effects of MMA on this patient population without TMJ surgi­cal management may result in the development of, or worsening TMJ pain, myofascial pain, headaches, ear symptoms, etc.
MRI Evaluation forPatients withTMJ Disorders andObstructive Sleep Apnea
371
24
a
c
b
d
. Fig. 24.10 a The disc is anteriorly displaced (red arrows) with an
inammatory process (reactive arthritis – ReA) within the joint as illustrated by the whitish tissue (green arrow) surrounding the disc and in the bilaminar tissues. The condyle (yellow arrow) is undergo­ing degenerative changes at the anterosuperior aspect. b ReA in a more advanced form. The blue arrows point out the inammatory tissue within the joint. The yellow arrow indicates the condyle with evidence of erosion and loss of vertical height. There may be some remnants of the disc, but for the most part, it has been destroyed by
24.4 Connective Tissue andAutoimmune
Diseases (CT/AI)
The common CT/AI diseases that can affect the TMJs include juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Sjogren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythema, sclero­derma, mixed connective tissue disease, etc. Multiple systems are commonly involved with these diseases. Peripheral joints are usually affected bilaterally and symmetrically inamed, resulting in progressive destruc­tion of articular structures. Facial deformity can occur
the inammatory process. c Severe ReA that has caused signicant destruction of the condyle (green arrow) with large mass of reactive tissue within the joint space as outlined by the white arrows. Even the articular eminence has been resorbed. d This MRI demonstrates a post-Mitek anchor repositioning of the articular disc in a patient with ReA.The disc (red arrow) is slowly being resorbed by the reac­tive tissue surrounding it (the grayish tissue) as well as causing arthritic changes to the condylar head
with TMJ involvement with associated condylar resorp­tion. Clinical and radiographic features include the fol­lowing: (1) retruded mandible, (2) posterior maxillary vertical hypoplasia, (3) progressive worsening facial and occlusal deformity, (4) high occlusal plane angle facial morphology, (5) Class II occlusion and anterior open bite, and (6) TMJ symptoms such as noises, pain, jaw dysfunction, headaches, and ear symptoms [45, 76].
MRI features include loss of condylar vertical dimension, signicant mediolateral condylar narrowing but the residual condylar stumps may mushroom and become broad in the A-P direction; articular eminence