Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4421_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
63 Мб
Скачать
Cone-Beam CT Use forAirway Imaging
87
8
8.2 Accuracy andReliability ofMeasuring
theAirway Using CBCT
Validation of CBCT technology to measure the air­way has been evaluated in several studies [3, 711]. Accuracy and reliability of airway volume digital measurements of CBCT compared with the manual measurements of an airway model was investigated by constructing an acrylic airway model attaching it to a human dry skull in the natural position of the airway passage [7]. The total and internal airway volumes, as well as the most constricted airway area, were mea­sured manually on the model and on the CBCTs taken after the model was attached to the skull. Results sug­gested that the CBCT digital measurements of the airway volume and the most constricted area of the airway are reliable and accurate [7]. Another article evaluated the accuracy of measurements made on CBCT images compared with the gold standard which is measurements made on a coordinate measuring machine [8]. The authors found that the coordinate correlation coefcient was virtually identical between the 3-3D CBCT images and the coordinate measuring machine measurements [8]. Evaluation of upper air­way using airway phantoms report high accuracy and reliability of CBCTs in measuring airway [9]. Amirlak etal. used a manual segmentation program to test the reliability and accuracy of CBCT images in measuring volumes, of articial defects, subsequently lled with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS). They used a water displace­ment technique for comparing the CBCT volumes with actual volumes and found that the manually seg­mented volumes were highly accurate compared to the water displacement technique which is considered as the gold standard [10]. Tsolakis etal. investigated the difference between CBCT and the acoustic reection (AR) imaging technique in calculating airway volumes and areas. Subjects with prescribed CBCT images as part of their records were also asked to have AR per­formed. A total of 59 subjects had their upper airway measured from CBCT images, acoustic rhinometry, and acoustic pharyngometry. It was found that CBCT is an accurate method for measuring anterior nasal volume, nasal minimal cross-sectional area, pharyn­geal volume, and pharyngeal minimal cross-sectional area [11]. Commercially available digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) viewers for measuring upper airway volumes were compared to show that manual segmentation was more accurate than semiautomatic segmentation, but all of them showed high correlations, suggesting the existence of a systematic error in the derivation of the airway volume[3].
8.3 Evaluation ofUpper Airway Using CBCT
This section provides a step-by-step guide for the airway analysis. (a) Orientation
In order to create different views in a standardized way and to obtain consistent measurements using CBCT images, image orientation should be the rst step within the software. A simple way to orient the volume can be done by adjusting the midsagittal plane on the skeletal midline of the face, then adjusting the axial plane on top of the Frankfort horizontal plane, and the coronal plane so it passes through the level of the furcation point of the right maxillary rst molar (. Fig. 8.2) [12]. The Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) orientation method is a more complex one and uses ve biologically relevant anatomic structures and one plane [13]. (b) Segmentation
Upper airway segmentation can be performed accu­rately either manually which is more time consuming or semiautomatically which is signicantly faster. In the semiautomatic approach, the software automatically dif­ferentiates the air and the surrounding soft tissues by using the differences in density values of these structures because the air space is of a greater negative Hounseld unit than the more dense surrounding soft tissue. A new tool in commercial software products allows us to visualize the different densities in different tissues in the craniofacial complex with the aid of the Hounseld Unit Color Mapping, which helps distinguish between different biological structures according to their radio­lucency measurements. A graph displays the colors as they fall on the Hounseld Scale as a reference, while the image on the screen is colored accordingly (.
Fig.8.3).
Automatic segmentation also allows the airway to be measured along a curved path, instead of simply along horizontal slices and an airway color coded by constric­tion is presented. Another method to measure the air­way by setting boundaries to the region of interest based on specic anatomical landmarks. Although it is mainly automatic, adjusting the airway sensitivity scale and placing seeds in the regions of interest to allow accurate segmentation is required in some commercial software products. .
Figures8.4, 8.5, and 8.6 show the different
methods to measure the upper airway.
Segmentation of Different Regions of Interest. The below regions of interest are areas commonly studied with suggested anatomic limits for proper reliability. There may be slight variations found in different studies, and slight variations with the true anatomic denition of such region.
88
J. M. Palomo et al.
8
. Fig. 8.2 Volume orientation can be done by adjusting the mid-
sagittal plane on the skeletal midline of the face, then adjusting the axial plane on top of the Frankfort horizontal plane, and the coronal
plane, so it passes through the level of the furcation point of the right maxillary rst molar
. Fig. 8.3 Three-dimensional reconstructed images in different
planes of space showing different densities in different tissues in the craniofacial complex with the aid of the Hounseld Unit Color Mapping tool, which helps you to distinguish between different bio-
logical structures according to their radiolucency measurements. A graph displays the colors as they fall on the Hounseld Scale as a reference, while the image on the screen is colored in accordingly
Cone-Beam CT Use forAirway Imaging
89
8
. Fig. 8.4 Setting boundaries to the region of interest based on specic anatomical landmarks. Although it is mainly automatic, adjusting
the airway sensitivity scale and placing seeds in the regions of interest to allow accurate segmentation is required
1. Nasal Passage: The volume is dened as being the pharyngeal volume located between the palatal plane and a parallel plane passing through the last axial
sented in an automatic setting with volume measure­ment or can be enabled through features in different software packages (. Fig.8.12).
slice before the nasal septum fused with the posterior pharyngeal wall. Once boundaries are outlined in the sagittal plane, additional boundaries outlining the

8.4 CBCT and OSA

respective airway are made in the axial and coronal planes (. Figs.8.7 and 8.8).
2. Oropharynx Volume: The volume is dened as the pharyngeal volume located between a plane passing through the palatal plane (PNS-ANS) and a parallel plane passing through the most antero- inferior point of the second cervical vertebrae (.
Fig.8.9).
3. Hypopharynx Volume: The volume is dened as the pharyngeal volume located between the inferior limit of the oropharynx volume and a parallel plane pass­ing through the most antero-superior point of the hyoid bone (. Fig.8.10).
4. Retro-palatal Volume: From the level of posterior nasal spine to the lower edge of the soft palate (. Fig.8.11a).
5. Retro-glossal Volume: From the lower edge of the soft palate to the hyoid bone (. Fig.8.11b).
6. The minimum axial area, also known as the area of
maximum constriction (mm
2
), can be determined for the whole airway volume or just in specic region of interest. Maximum constriction area can be pre-
OSA is a common disorder characterized by collapse of the upper airway during sleep resulting in hypox­emia and arousal [14]. CBCT can be employed to assess the location of obstruction in OSA patients. One study compared the upper airway structure in OSA patients and control subjects using CBCT images [15]. It was shown that OSA subjects presented lower total airway volume, smaller anterior-posterior dimension of the minimum cross-section segment, and smaller minimum cross-section area. Also, the OSA group showed elliptic­shaped airway, while the non-OSA group showed round or square airway [15]. Another study compared CBCT scan measurements between patients with OSA and snorers to develop a prediction model for OSA based on CBCT imaging and the Berlin questionnaire. It was found out that the upper airway dimension was signi­cantly smaller in the OSA patients [16]. Recent study evaluated the upper airway dimensions of OSA and control subjects using CBCT.Results showed that OSA subjects had a signicantly smaller average airway area,
90
J. M. Palomo et al.
8
. Figs. 8.5 and 8.6 Automatic segmentation of the airway measured along a curved path, instead of simply along horizontal slices and an
airway color coded by constriction is presented
Cone-Beam CT Use forAirway Imaging
91
8
. Fig. 8.5 and 8.6 (continued)
92
J. M. Palomo et al.
8
. Fig. 8.7 Nasal passage volume is dened as being the pharyngeal volume located between the palatal plane and a parallel plane passing
through the last axial slice before the nasal septum fused with the posterior pharyngeal wall
average airway volume, total airway volume, and mean
8.5.1 CPAP
airway width. OSA subjects had a signicantly larger airway length measurement [17].
The hyoid bone which is a predictor of airway obstruc-
tion plays an important role in the airway patency. Links between hyoid position and airway resistance have been demonstrated in the literature [1820]. The increased dis­tance of the hyoid bone to mandibular plane has shown to be correlated to OSA in the literature; more than 15mm is considered abnormal and associated with OSA [21]. One study demonstrated the correlation of upper airway resistance with the posterior airway space and the vertical/horizontal position of the hyoid bone. A more downward position of the hyoid bone was demonstrated in OSA subjects compared to normal subjects [22].
CPAP is the most effective method to manage OSA.It improves subjective and objective measures of sleepi­ness [24].The most signicant effect is enlargement of the airway by dimensional changes of the lateral pha­ryngeal walls. Our study in the 1980s showed that CPAP acts as a pneumatic splint and passively open the upper airway to prevent obstructive apnea [14]. A recent study evaluated OSA patients by taking CBCT scans during application of positive and negative pressures to the respiratory system while awake and seated [25].The rst scan was taken during a cycle of resting breathing. Two other images were obtained when pressure was applied using a full facemask also in the seated posture during wakefulness. The mask was connected to a positive/neg­ative pressure source. One scan was taken while breath-
8.5 Evaluation ofOSA Treatment
Approaches Using CBCT
ing on a mask pressure of +10cm H2O and the other scan was taken while the patient breathed against a mask pressure of– 2cm H2O (. Figs.8.13 and 8.14). Positive
Continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) is the stan­dard, rst-line therapy for treating OSA; however, the general effectiveness of initial CPAP therapy is depen­dent on patient acceptance and adherence to treatment [23]. Other options include oral appliances, nerve stimu­lation, and surgical procedures to anatomically improve airway function.
pressure application of +10cm H2O showed signicant airway volume increase in all regions (36%). The hypo­pharynx volume increased the most with 50%, followed by oropharynx with 23%, and the nasopharynx with
17.7%. The minimal cross-section area changed from
100.57±38.74mm2 to 130.64±64.01mm2.There was no signicant change of the tongue length when using
Cone-Beam CT Use forAirway Imaging
93
8
. Fig. 8.8 Nasal passage volume segmentation and outcome
positive pressure. Superimposition on the cranial base showed no change in the hyoid bone position vertically or horizontally. Negative pressure showed a signicantly airway volume decrease in all regions (28%). The vol­ume of the upper airway was nearly collapsed with the negative pressure. The oropharynx decreased the most, with 31%, followed by the hypopharynx with 30%, and the nasopharynx with 19.0%. The average minimal cross-section area changed from 100.57±38.74mm2 to
52.00±23.01mm2 with no change in hyoid bone posi-
tion and tongue length. It was concluded that increases and decreases in intraluminal pressure alter the airway geometry but do so without changing hyoid position.
8.5.2 Oral Appliances
An oral appliance is tted to the upper and lower teeth and is designed to work by xing and/or anterior posi­tioning the mandible, preventing the collapse of the
94
J. M. Palomo et al.
8
. Fig. 8.9 Oropharynx volume is dened as the pharyngeal volume located between a plane passing through the palatal plane (PNS-ANS)
and a parallel plane passing through the most antero- inferior point of the second cervical vertebrae
tongue and/or increasing the posterior oropharyngeal airway space, therefore reducing the collapse of the upper airway during sleep [26]. Oral appliances can be rst­line therapy but are more commonly used for patients who are not compliant with CPAP and diagnosed with mild and moderate OSA; and oral appliance also treats simple snoring. Recently, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommended the oral appliances as a rst line of therapy in patients with mild- to- moderate OSA.In a randomized clinical trial, the treatment out­come of oral appliances and CPAP therapy of OSA
shown that the upper airway was increased mainly by increasing the volume of the velopharynx [29].
. Figure8.15 shows airway volume changes for one
patient with and without oral appliance.
Dental side effects associated with oral appliances and CPAP were assessed in a randomized clinical trial to show that there is a small dental change with oral appli­ances but signicant if compared with CPAP.Different studies showed decrease in overbite and overjet, procli­nation of lower incisors, retroclination of upper incisors [3035].
patients was reported to show that oral appliance should be considered as an alternative to CPAP in patients with mild-to-moderate OSA.While patients with severe OSA,
8.5.3 Maxillomandibular Advancement
CPAP should remain the rst line of treatment [26].The most commonly used oral appliances are the mandibu­lar advancement devices which reposition the mandible, tongue, and hyoid bone anteriorly to increase dimensions of the upper airway [27, 28]. The upper airway structures were evaluated in patients with OSA by using MRI scans of upper airway with and without oral appliances. It was
Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery is a well-established treatment of obstructive OSA [36]. The rationale for MMA is to increase the anteroposterior and the lateral dimensions at multilevels of the upper airway [37], and reduce upper airway collapsibility with the superior and anterior movement of the hyoid
Cone-Beam CT Use forAirway Imaging
95
8
. Fig. 8.10 Hypopharynx volume is dened as the pharyngeal volume located between the inferior limit of the oropharynx volume and a
parallel plane passing through the most antero-superior point of the hyoid bone
bone [38]. In systematic review of data regarding MMA advancement for OSA treatment, it was shown that MMA advancement is the most successful surgical ther­apy for OSA [39]. Schendel etal. evaluated 10 patients with moderate or severe OSA who underwent MMA surgery by preoperative and postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans and polysomnograms. The volume of the UAS increased signicantly by 237% as a result of the MMA.The retropalatal volume increased more than retroglossal volume, 361% to 165% [21]. Linear and volumetric morphological changes of upper airway after MMA for OSA patients were assessed using CBCT. It was shown that MMA increased the airway total volume, minimal cross-sectional area, anteroposte­rior and lateral dimensions, airway index, airway length, posterior airway space morphology, Apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), and Epworth sleepiness score [36]. CBCT images are recommended for three-dimensional airway
and soft tissue evaluation in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (. Fig.8.16) [40].

8.6 Upper Airway Stimulation

A relatively novel and cutting edge treatment is upper airway electrical stimulation (UAS) therapy using a fully implanted system. The Inspire implant (Inspire Medical Systems, Inc., Maple Grove, MN and FDA approved in April 2014) is offered for the treatment of moderate-to- severe obstructive sleep apnea who cannot use CPAP therapy, and is known to decrease the sever­ity and symptoms of OSA in selected patients [4144]. The therapeutic approach, as initially described, is to deliver stimulation to the hypoglossal nerve, synchro­nized with breathing efforts [45]. The patient can turn the therapy on before bedtime, and off in the morning
96
J. M. Palomo et al.
8
. Fig. 8.11 a Retropalatal volume: From the level of posterior nasal spine to the lower edge of the soft palate. b Retroglossal volume: From
the lower edge of the soft palate to the hyoid bone
. Fig. 8.12 The minimum axial area, also known as the area of maximum constriction (mm2), which can be determined for the whole air-
way volume or just in specic region of interest
using a remote control. When the device is activated, it senses the person’s breathing patterns, delivering mild stimulation in order to keep the airway open, acting in a similar way than a pacemaker. The level of stimulation can be custom to each patient depending on patient’s unique BMI and AHI.The UAS system is implanted on the right-hand side of the patient while under gen­eral anesthesia, through three surgical incisions. The
median time for implantation has been reported to average 140minutes, with most patients spending the night at the hospital [43]. A recent study evaluated seven patients who had previously undergone surgi­cal implantation for UAS therapy at the University Hospitals Case Medical Center (Cleveland, OH); all were regularly using therapy. Each had been deemed a candidate on the basis of (a) CPAP intolerance, (b) an