Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5193_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Disclaimer for Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Manual
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Commercialization
- •References
- •References
- •3: Asensus Surgical: Senhance Surgical System
- •Asensus Surgical: Senhance Surgical System
- •Senhance System Console
- •Straight Stick Instruments
- •Articulating Instruments
- •Energy
- •Intelligent Surgical Unit
- •Advanced Intelligent Surgical Unit Features
- •Senhance Connect
- •Surgeons Console Design
- •Arm Cart Design
- •The Hugo RAS™ System
- •Robotic Arms
- •The Surgeon’s Console
- •System Tower
- •Arm Cart
- •Hugo Instruments
- •Future Developments
- •References
- •5: Versius Surgical Robot
- •Introduction
- •System Design
- •Surgeon Console
- •Disclaimers
- •The Head-Up Display (HUD)
- •Some Important Icons
- •Alarm Icons
- •Arm Modes
- •Arm Clash
- •System Connections
- •Approved Procedures
- •Some Important Safety Features
- •Conclusion
- •6: Virtual Incision: MIRA Surgical System
- •Introduction
- •The MIRA Surgical System
- •Indication
- •Additional Technical Information
- •Clinical Data
- •Telesurgery
- •Purpose
- •Adopting
- •Operationalizing
- •Standardizing
- •Lessons
- •Conclusion
- •Bibliography
- •Introduction
- •Curricula Components
- •Web-Based Training
- •Virtual Simulation
- •Bedside Skills
- •Console Training
- •Training Programs
- •Intuitive Surgical Da Vinci Curriculum
- •Robotic Training Network (RTN)
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •9: Digital Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Advanced Visualization
- •3D Visualization
- •Fluorescence-Guided Surgery
- •Augmented Reality
- •Current Implementation
- •Enhanced Instrumentation
- •Data Capture
- •Video Data
- •Data Analytics
- •Artificial Intelligence
- •Surgical Decision-Making
- •Skills Assessment
- •Patient Care
- •Automated Surgery
- •Connectivity
- •Telementoring
- •Education
- •Clinical Practice
- •Telesurgery
- •Robotic Surgical Platforms
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Foundational Knowledge
- •Practical Skills
- •Continuing Education
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Robotic Surgery Curriculum
- •Surgical Decision-Making
- •Surgical Technique
- •Operative Technique
- •Facebook™ Groups
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •12: Robotic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pathophysiology
- •Clinical Features
- •Diagnosis
- •Endoscopic Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP)
- •Treatment
- •Pharmacotherapy
- •Endoscopic Treatment
- •Botulinum Toxin Injection
- •Pneumatic Dilation
- •Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
- •Heller Myotomy
- •Operative Steps
- •Liver Retraction
- •Hiatal Dissection
- •Myotomy
- •Partial Fundoplication
- •Intraoperative Complications
- •Esophageal Perforation
- •Gastric Perforation
- •Vagal Nerve Injury
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •14: Robotic Esophagectomy
- •Introduction
- •Robotic-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy
- •Abdominal Phase
- •Thoracic Phase
- •Robotic-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy
- •Thoracic Phase
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Local Resection: “Wedge Gastrectomy”
- •Lymphadenectomy
- •Proximal Gastrectomy
- •Distal Gastrectomy
- •Total Gastrectomy
- •Reconstruction
- •Billroth I
- •Roux-en-Y
- •Double-Tract Reconstruction
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •16: Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy
- •Introduction
- •Operative Technique
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •17: Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Patient Preparation
- •Technique (Key Operative Steps)
- •Complications
- •Early Complications
- •Late Complications
- •References
- •18: DS/SADI
- •Introduction
- •Patient Preparation
- •Surgical Technique
- •Single Anastomosis DuodenoIleal Bypass
- •Sleeve Gastrectomy
- •Bowel Measurement
- •Duodenal Dissection
- •Duodenoileostomy
- •Bowel Measurement
- •Enteroenterostomy
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Part I: Revisional Foregut Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Operative Principles: Robotic Revisional Foregut Surgery
- •Presurgical Care: Optimization/Prehabilitation
- •Operating Room Setup
- •Patient Positioning
- •Access/Port Placement/Liver Retraction
- •Fundoplication Takedown
- •Crural Repair
- •Mesh Reinforcement
- •Antireflux Procedure
- •Outcomes
- •Part II: Revisional Bariatric Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Assessment
- •Setup
- •Access/Port Placement/Liver Retraction
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •References
- •20: Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Robotic TAPP
- •Instrumentation
- •Dissection
- •Mesh
- •Closure
- •Special Cases
- •Acute Presentation
- •Common Complications
- •Chronic Pain
- •Recurrence
- •Testicular Ischemia
- •Mesh Infection
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Intraoperative Considerations
- •R-TAPP
- •IPOM
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •22: Complex Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
- •Background
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Botox Injection
- •Patient Selection
- •Operative Procedure
- •Patient Positioning
- •Technique
- •Hybrid Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •23: Robotic Cholecystectomy
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Robotic Dissection
- •Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Robotic Liver Resection
- •Patient Selection
- •Positioning
- •Port Placement
- •Standard Robotic Instruments
- •Right Hepatectomy (see Video 1)
- •Falciform Dissection
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Intraoperative Ultrasound
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •Left Hepatectomy
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Pringle Maneuver
- •Left Lateral Sectionectomy
- •Right Posterior Sectionectomy
- •Segment 7 Resection
- •Segment 8 Resection
- •Robotic Biliary Reconstruction
- •Choledochal Cyst
- •Bile Duct Injury
- •Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •25: Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple)
- •Robotic Whipple
- •Patient Selection
- •Operative Steps
- •Supra-pancreatic/Hilar Dissection
- •Uncinate Dissection
- •Reconstruction Phase
- •Final Steps
- •Vascular Resections
- •Postoperative Care
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •26: Right Hemicolectomy
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Preparation
- •Patient Positioning
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Background
- •Indications
- •Operation Steps
- •Left Hemicolectomy
- •Total Colectomy
- •Learning Curve
- •Future Directions
- •Suprapubic Approach
- •Single-Site Robotic Surgery
- •da Vinci SP® Surgical System
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •28: Low Anterior Resection
- •Background
- •Learning Curve
- •Training Program
- •Genitourinary Function
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Operative Procedure
- •Room Setup
- •Patient Positioning
- •Technique
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •29: Robotic Lateral Transabdominal Adrenalectomy
- •Introduction
- •Pertinent Anatomy
- •Patient Positioning
- •Right Adrenalectomy
- •Port Placement
- •Technique
- •Left Adrenalectomy
- •Port Placement
- •Technique
- •Postoperative Care
- •Limitations
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Operative Room Setup
- •Patient Position
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Step 1: Working Space
- •Step 3: Console Time
- •Discussion
- •References
- •31: Robotic Pulmonary Lobectomy
- •Current Evidence
- •Surgical Technique
- •Right-Sided Resections
- •Right Upper Lobectomy
- •Right Lower Lobectomy
- •Right Middle Lobectomy
- •Left-Sided Resections
- •Left Lower Lobectomy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •32: Robotic-Assisted Cardiac Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass
- •Operative Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Robotic-Assisted TECAB
- •Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR)
- •Robotic-Assisted Mitral Valve Surgery
- •Patient Selection
- •Outcomes
- •Robotic Aortic Valve Replacement
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •33: Mediastinal Procedures
- •Introduction
- •Anterior Mediastinal Mass Example Case Scenario
- •Anterior Mediastinal Mass Excision Operative Steps
- •Middle Mediastinal Mass Example Case Scenario
- •Middle Mediastinal Cyst Excision Operative Steps
- •Posterior Mediastinal Mass Case Scenario
- •Patient Positioning
- •Posterior Mediastinal Mass Excision Operative Steps
- •Summary
- •References
- •34: Liver Transplantation
- •Introduction
- •Robotic Donor Hepatectomy
- •Patient Selection
- •Positioning
- •Port Placement
- •Instruments
- •Adjunct Robotic Instruments
- •Right Donor Hepatectomy
- •Falciform Dissection
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Demarcation
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •“Rubber Band” Retraction Technique
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •Closure
- •Left Donor Hepatectomy
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Demarcation
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •“Rubber Band” Retraction Technique
- •Parenchymal Transection

354
I. H. Ozata and E. Balık
connection between the system and the operating table. This enables the surgeon to
dynamically position the patient while doing the operation.
Surgical Technique Using theDa Vinci Platform
The Veress technique serves as a standard method for establishing pneumoperitoneum in minimally invasive surgical procedures. In robotic surgery (Video 26.1 for
robotic right hemicolectomy), a conguration involving four robotic trocars and one
assistant trocar is commonly employed to facilitate the robotic approach. The strategic placement of ports to the left of the midline is typically preferred to optimize
Fig. 26.1 Operation room conguration

26 Right Hemicolectomy
355
the surgical workspace and provide maximal access for the robotic instruments during the procedure (Fig.26.2). This port arrangement allows for enhanced maneuverability and precision in performing right hemicolectomy using the da Vinci Xi
robotic platform, ensuring efcient and effective completion of the surgical
intervention.
The AirSeal® system is a trocar without valves that enables a stable pneumoperitoneum and ongoing removal of smoke during surgical procedures. This technology
has been associated with enhanced visualization, decreased abdominal pressures,
and subsequently, a decrease in cardiopulmonary complications, ileus, and postoperative pain [10].
On the other hand, table motion technology in robotic surgery improves surgical
precision and efciency by enabling better maneuverability and positioning during
procedures. This integration allows surgeons to easily modify the orientation and
alignment of the robotic arms and instruments, thereby improving overall dexterity
and range of motion during surgery.
The abdominal cavity is systematically examined upon entry, dividing the assessment into four quadrants for a thorough evaluation. Simultaneously, a comprehensive assessment is conducted on the liver surface and peritoneum to detect any
abnormalities (Fig.26.3). The colon and omentum are repositioned over the falciform ligament to improve exposure and access. This maneuver improves the clarity
and ease of access to the right colon. The small bowel is then moved to the left lower
quadrant. This repositioning enables the accurate identication of the ileocolic pedicle, a crucial step in robotic right hemicolectomy.
The robotic cart is positioned to approach the patient from the right side in an
orientation. The system utilizes automatic targeting to align the robotic arms optimally, enhancing their range of motion and reducing the chance of collisions. This
feature directs the camera toward the patient’s anatomy. The 30° robotic endoscope
is inserted through Port 2, situated above the umbilicus (Fig.26.4). The initial
robotic arm is outtted with either monopolar curved scissors or a robotic vessel
Fig. 26.2 Placement of
the ports

356
Fig. 26.3 Liver surface
and peritoneum
I. H. Ozata and E. Balık
sealing device. The third robotic arm uses a fenestrated bipolar instrument, and the
fourth arm employs a Cadiere grasper for tissue manipulation. An 8–10mm assistant port is used to hold gauze or instruments such as the suction irrigator or a laparoscopic bowel grasper. To enhance visibility in challenging situations, consider
adding a 5-mm assistant port to the surgical eld.
In a medial-to-lateral technique, arm 4 is used to retract the terminal ileum/
cecum to elevate and apply tension to the ileocolic pedicle. The peritoneum below
the ileocolic pedicle is incised using a fenestrated monopolar grasper in arm 1 and
a bipolar scissor in arm 3 while holding the fatty tissue containing the vessels
(Fig.26.5). This maneuver exposes the vascular pedicle for dissection, followed by
the dissection, ligation, and division of the vessels (Fig.26.6). Following the dissec-
tion, the superior mesenteric vein is observed with the presence of clips, as well as
the middle colic vein with attached clips (Fig.26.7). The submesenteric dissection
begins directly beneath the mesenteric opening. The dissection process is ongoing
following the embryologic planes, revealing the retroperitoneal structures such as
the duodenum, head of the pancreas, gonadal vessels, and right ureter (Fig.26.8).
The dissection extends sideways to the abdominal wall, downward to the sacral
promontory, and upward revealing the duodenum and head of the pancreas (Fredet
fascia-anterior duodenopancreatic fascia). The identication of the pancreatic and
colic branches of the gastrocolic trunk of Henle is conrmed (Fig.26.9).
The dissection will proceed along the superior mesenteric vein until reaching the
middle colic vein. In a standard right colectomy, the right branch of the middle colic
pedicle is tied off and cut. If present, the right colic artery is tied off. Ligation of any
additional vessel structures, such as the right colic vein in the mesentery of the right
colon, is performed. The mesentery is separated into the transverse colon
(Fig. 26.10). A gauze is positioned as a marker to be located horizontally. The
omentum is separated from the distal transverse colon, allowing access to the lesser
sac, and then included in the specimen side. Omentectomy, the partial or complete
removal of the omentum, is a surgical option that may be considered during right

26 Right Hemicolectomy
357
ab cd
e
fgh
j
i
Fig. 26.4 Robotic arms and instruments. (a) Monopolar curved scissors (b) Monopolar hook (c)
Maryland bipolar forceps. (d) Fenestrated bipolar forceps. (e) Medium-large clip applier. (f) Large
clip applier (g) Vessel sealer (h) Tip-up fenestrated grasper. (i) Large needle driver. (j)
SureForm® stapler

358
Fig. 26.5 Ileocolic
pedicle in mesenterium
Fig. 26.6 Ileocolic
pedicle originating from
the superior
mesenteric vein
I. H. Ozata and E. Balık
Fig. 26.7 Superior
mesenteric vein with clips
and middle colic vein with
attached clips

26 Right Hemicolectomy
Fig. 26.8 Right ureter and
right gonadal vein
Fig. 26.9 Duodenum and
gastrocolic trunk
359
Fig. 26.10 Separation of
mesentery
hemicolectomy for colon tumors, depending on factors such as the location of the
tumor, the extent of the disease, and preoperative radiologic ndings. The transverse
colon is repositioned to the cephalic side, and the remaining omental and colonic
attachments are cut. This dissection is made easier by the prior submesenteric
dissection, which involves detecting the landmark gauze.

360
I. H. Ozata and E. Balık
The cecum, appendix, and terminal ileum are freed by cutting the peritoneal
attachments in the right lower quadrant. The mesentery of the terminal ileum is cut
about 10cm prior to ileocecal valve reaching the small intestine wall. Robotic stapler is used to divide the terminal ileum and the transverse colon. Arterial blood
supply is controlled by administering indocyanine green intravenously and examining the terminal ileum and transverse colon using Firey® mode (Fig.26.11).
The Firey® system, which is incorporated into the da Vinci surgical platform,
employs near-infrared light to observe the absorption of indocyanine green (ICG)
by tissues. This technology enables the immediate and accurate identication of
important landmarks during surgical procedures, using image guidance enhancing
the precision and accuracy [11]. The Firey® technology utilizes ICG uorescence
imaging to enhance the visualization of crucial anatomical structures. This aids surgeons in detecting minute and imperceptible lesions, as well as guiding procedures
like central lymph node mapping and identifying regions with inadequate blood
circulation during surgical operations.
A side-to-side anastomosis is created using isoperistaltic technique. An enterotomy incision is made in the terminal ileum and the transverse colon, and
robotic stapler, SureForm®, is then inserted which uses SmartFire technology to
monitor tissue compression before and during ring. Typically, the wider jaw of
the stapler is inserted into the colon, followed by bringing the ileum over and
inserting the narrower stapler jaw (Fig.26.12). SureForm® is red to create the
Fig. 26.11 Firey® mode
with indocyanine green
Fig. 26.12 Colon and
ileum with SureForm®
stapler

26 Right Hemicolectomy
Fig. 26.13 Suturing
intestinal opening
361
anastomosis, and the intestinal opening is then closed with a continuous suture
(Fig.26.13). Pfannenstiel incision is made and the specimen is removed using a
wound protector. Next, the wound protector is sealed, the process of introducing
gas into the abdomen is resumed, a thorough examination of the abdomen is
conducted to ensure there is no bleeding, and the ports are taken out while being
directly observed in low pressure. The decision to utilize drains in surgical procedures, lacking substantial evidence, typically relies on the surgeon’s expertise
and approach.
Recovery After theSurgery
Postoperative discharge following colorectal surgery is a critical component of
patient care that requires careful consideration to ensure patient safety and promote
the best possible recovery. Criteria for discharge commonly include factors like
tolerance of oral nutrition, effective pain management, bowel recovery, and autonomy in daily living activities as stated by Biondi etal. [12]. Biomarkers such as
C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have been suggested as early indicators of septic complications and dehiscence, aiding in a safe hospital discharge [13, 14]. Early
discharge has been associated with positive patient experiences and enhanced
recovery. However, it is crucial to weigh the benets of early discharge against the
risks of readmission and postoperative complications [15, 16]. Therefore, a compre-
hensive assessment of patient recovery, compliance with enhanced recovery protocols, and individual risk factors is essential in determining the appropriate timing
for discharge after surgery.
After colorectal surgery, patients undergo a period of recovery and adaptation to resume their usual daily routines and quality of life. Research has emphasized the inuence of colorectal surgery on patients’ well-being, underscoring
the signicance of monitoring postoperative complications and quality of life
results. Understanding the physical, emotional, and social components of life
following colorectal surgery is essential for healthcare professionals to assist
patients in their recovery process and improve their postoperative health.

362
I. H. Ozata and E. Balık
Conclusion
Robotic right hemicolectomy represents the highest achievement in minimally
invasive surgical methods for treating colon cancer. It provides improved accuracy, less damage to the body, and faster recovery, all while following oncologic
principles. This approach not only adheres to the highest standard of complete
mesocolic excision but also offers benets such as reduced risk of infection and
enhanced surgical outcomes. The success of this procedure relies heavily on the
preparation, positioning of the patient, and recovery phases. This emphasizes the
signicance of conducting a thorough preoperative assessment and providing
comprehensive postoperative care. With advancements in technology and increasing surgeon expertise, robotic surgery offers the potential to enhance the treatment of colon cancer by maximizing patient advantages and advancing surgical
techniques.
References
1. Wang C, Gao Z, Shen K, Shen Z, Jiang K, Liang B, etal. Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a
systemic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis. 2017;19(11):962–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/
codi.13900.
2. Bertelsen C, Gundestrup A, Olsen A, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Kleif J.Association between plane
of mesocolic dissection and recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon
cancer: a cohort study. Color Dis. 2023;25(7):1392–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16551.
3. Trilling B, Delattre F, Faucheron J.Comment on “efcacy and safety of complete mesocolic
excision in patients with colon cancer: three-year results from a prospective, nonrandomized, double-blind, controlled trial”. Ann Surg. 2020;274(6):e788–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/
sla.0000000000004403.
4. Aziz M, El-Deen A, Hasanien A, Attia A, Hafez A.Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision
with central vascular ligation for right colonic cancer (feasibility & safety). Minia J Med Res.
2020;31(1):262–7. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2022.221517.
5. Tribuzi A, Marzano M, Paolini C, Bencini L, Marino M, Coratti A.Robotic extended right
colectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Color Dis. 2020;22(11):1807. https://doi.
org/10.1111/codi.15246.
6. Ng KT, Tsia AKV, Chong VYL.Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. World J Surg.
2019;43(4):1146–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268- 018- 04896- 7.
7. Childers R, Lipsett PA, Pawlik TM.Informed consent and the surgeon. J Am Coll Surg.
2009;208(4):627–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.012.
8. Castagneto-Gissey L, Russo MF, Casella-Mariolo J, Serao A, Marcellinaro R, D'Andrea
V, Carlini M, Casella G. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in anastomotic leak prevention
during elective colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;12(2):397. https://doi.org/10.3390/
antibiotics12020397.
9. Anderson DR, Morgano GP, Bennett C, Dentali F, Francis CW, García D, etal. American society of hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of
venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients. Blood Adv. 2019;3(23):3898–944.
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000975.

26 Right Hemicolectomy
10. Razdan S, Üçpınar B, Okhawere K, Badani KK.The role of airseal in robotic urologic surgery: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2023;33(1):21–31. https://doi.
org/10.1089/lap.2022.0153.
11. Koerner C, Rosen S.How robotics is changing and will change the eld of colorectal surgery.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;11(10):381–7. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v11.i10.381.
12. Biondi A, Mele MC, Agnes A, Lorenzon L, Cintoni M, Rinninella E, et al. Feasibility of
discharge within 72 hours of major colorectal surgery: lessons learned after 5 years of institutional experience with the eras protocol. BJS Open. 2022;6(1) https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/
zrac002.
13. Ortega-Deballon P, Radais F, Facy O, d’Athis P, Masson D, Charles P, etal. C-reactive protein
is an early predictor of septic complications after elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg.
2010;34(4):808–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268- 009- 0367- x.
14. Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Antonelli M, Nigri G, Pirozzi F, Casagranda B, etal. Procalcitonin
reveals early dehiscence in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):967–72. https://doi.
org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001365.
15. Jakobsson J, Idvall E, Wann-Hansson C.Patient-reported recovery after enhanced colorectal
cancer surgery: a longitudinal six-month follow-up study. Int J Color Dis. 2014;29(8):989–98.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384- 014- 1939- 2.
16. Azevedo J, Mendes CRS, Lima MLD, Pessoa JCSDP, Julião GPS, Perez RO, etal. Laparoscopic
colorectal surgery and discharge within 24 h—who is at risk for readmission? Color Dis.
2021;23(10):2714–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15791.
363
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
