Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5193_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Disclaimer for Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Manual
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Commercialization
- •References
- •References
- •3: Asensus Surgical: Senhance Surgical System
- •Asensus Surgical: Senhance Surgical System
- •Senhance System Console
- •Straight Stick Instruments
- •Articulating Instruments
- •Energy
- •Intelligent Surgical Unit
- •Advanced Intelligent Surgical Unit Features
- •Senhance Connect
- •Surgeons Console Design
- •Arm Cart Design
- •The Hugo RAS™ System
- •Robotic Arms
- •The Surgeon’s Console
- •System Tower
- •Arm Cart
- •Hugo Instruments
- •Future Developments
- •References
- •5: Versius Surgical Robot
- •Introduction
- •System Design
- •Surgeon Console
- •Disclaimers
- •The Head-Up Display (HUD)
- •Some Important Icons
- •Alarm Icons
- •Arm Modes
- •Arm Clash
- •System Connections
- •Approved Procedures
- •Some Important Safety Features
- •Conclusion
- •6: Virtual Incision: MIRA Surgical System
- •Introduction
- •The MIRA Surgical System
- •Indication
- •Additional Technical Information
- •Clinical Data
- •Telesurgery
- •Purpose
- •Adopting
- •Operationalizing
- •Standardizing
- •Lessons
- •Conclusion
- •Bibliography
- •Introduction
- •Curricula Components
- •Web-Based Training
- •Virtual Simulation
- •Bedside Skills
- •Console Training
- •Training Programs
- •Intuitive Surgical Da Vinci Curriculum
- •Robotic Training Network (RTN)
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •9: Digital Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Advanced Visualization
- •3D Visualization
- •Fluorescence-Guided Surgery
- •Augmented Reality
- •Current Implementation
- •Enhanced Instrumentation
- •Data Capture
- •Video Data
- •Data Analytics
- •Artificial Intelligence
- •Surgical Decision-Making
- •Skills Assessment
- •Patient Care
- •Automated Surgery
- •Connectivity
- •Telementoring
- •Education
- •Clinical Practice
- •Telesurgery
- •Robotic Surgical Platforms
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Foundational Knowledge
- •Practical Skills
- •Continuing Education
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Robotic Surgery Curriculum
- •Surgical Decision-Making
- •Surgical Technique
- •Operative Technique
- •Facebook™ Groups
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •12: Robotic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pathophysiology
- •Clinical Features
- •Diagnosis
- •Endoscopic Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP)
- •Treatment
- •Pharmacotherapy
- •Endoscopic Treatment
- •Botulinum Toxin Injection
- •Pneumatic Dilation
- •Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
- •Heller Myotomy
- •Operative Steps
- •Liver Retraction
- •Hiatal Dissection
- •Myotomy
- •Partial Fundoplication
- •Intraoperative Complications
- •Esophageal Perforation
- •Gastric Perforation
- •Vagal Nerve Injury
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •14: Robotic Esophagectomy
- •Introduction
- •Robotic-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy
- •Abdominal Phase
- •Thoracic Phase
- •Robotic-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy
- •Thoracic Phase
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Local Resection: “Wedge Gastrectomy”
- •Lymphadenectomy
- •Proximal Gastrectomy
- •Distal Gastrectomy
- •Total Gastrectomy
- •Reconstruction
- •Billroth I
- •Roux-en-Y
- •Double-Tract Reconstruction
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •16: Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy
- •Introduction
- •Operative Technique
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •17: Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Patient Preparation
- •Technique (Key Operative Steps)
- •Complications
- •Early Complications
- •Late Complications
- •References
- •18: DS/SADI
- •Introduction
- •Patient Preparation
- •Surgical Technique
- •Single Anastomosis DuodenoIleal Bypass
- •Sleeve Gastrectomy
- •Bowel Measurement
- •Duodenal Dissection
- •Duodenoileostomy
- •Bowel Measurement
- •Enteroenterostomy
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Part I: Revisional Foregut Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Operative Principles: Robotic Revisional Foregut Surgery
- •Presurgical Care: Optimization/Prehabilitation
- •Operating Room Setup
- •Patient Positioning
- •Access/Port Placement/Liver Retraction
- •Fundoplication Takedown
- •Crural Repair
- •Mesh Reinforcement
- •Antireflux Procedure
- •Outcomes
- •Part II: Revisional Bariatric Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Assessment
- •Setup
- •Access/Port Placement/Liver Retraction
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •References
- •20: Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Robotic TAPP
- •Instrumentation
- •Dissection
- •Mesh
- •Closure
- •Special Cases
- •Acute Presentation
- •Common Complications
- •Chronic Pain
- •Recurrence
- •Testicular Ischemia
- •Mesh Infection
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Intraoperative Considerations
- •R-TAPP
- •IPOM
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •22: Complex Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
- •Background
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Botox Injection
- •Patient Selection
- •Operative Procedure
- •Patient Positioning
- •Technique
- •Hybrid Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •23: Robotic Cholecystectomy
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Robotic Dissection
- •Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Robotic Liver Resection
- •Patient Selection
- •Positioning
- •Port Placement
- •Standard Robotic Instruments
- •Right Hepatectomy (see Video 1)
- •Falciform Dissection
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Intraoperative Ultrasound
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •Left Hepatectomy
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Pringle Maneuver
- •Left Lateral Sectionectomy
- •Right Posterior Sectionectomy
- •Segment 7 Resection
- •Segment 8 Resection
- •Robotic Biliary Reconstruction
- •Choledochal Cyst
- •Bile Duct Injury
- •Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •25: Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple)
- •Robotic Whipple
- •Patient Selection
- •Operative Steps
- •Supra-pancreatic/Hilar Dissection
- •Uncinate Dissection
- •Reconstruction Phase
- •Final Steps
- •Vascular Resections
- •Postoperative Care
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •26: Right Hemicolectomy
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Preparation
- •Patient Positioning
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Background
- •Indications
- •Operation Steps
- •Left Hemicolectomy
- •Total Colectomy
- •Learning Curve
- •Future Directions
- •Suprapubic Approach
- •Single-Site Robotic Surgery
- •da Vinci SP® Surgical System
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •28: Low Anterior Resection
- •Background
- •Learning Curve
- •Training Program
- •Genitourinary Function
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Operative Procedure
- •Room Setup
- •Patient Positioning
- •Technique
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •29: Robotic Lateral Transabdominal Adrenalectomy
- •Introduction
- •Pertinent Anatomy
- •Patient Positioning
- •Right Adrenalectomy
- •Port Placement
- •Technique
- •Left Adrenalectomy
- •Port Placement
- •Technique
- •Postoperative Care
- •Limitations
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Operative Room Setup
- •Patient Position
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Step 1: Working Space
- •Step 3: Console Time
- •Discussion
- •References
- •31: Robotic Pulmonary Lobectomy
- •Current Evidence
- •Surgical Technique
- •Right-Sided Resections
- •Right Upper Lobectomy
- •Right Lower Lobectomy
- •Right Middle Lobectomy
- •Left-Sided Resections
- •Left Lower Lobectomy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •32: Robotic-Assisted Cardiac Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass
- •Operative Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Robotic-Assisted TECAB
- •Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR)
- •Robotic-Assisted Mitral Valve Surgery
- •Patient Selection
- •Outcomes
- •Robotic Aortic Valve Replacement
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •33: Mediastinal Procedures
- •Introduction
- •Anterior Mediastinal Mass Example Case Scenario
- •Anterior Mediastinal Mass Excision Operative Steps
- •Middle Mediastinal Mass Example Case Scenario
- •Middle Mediastinal Cyst Excision Operative Steps
- •Posterior Mediastinal Mass Case Scenario
- •Patient Positioning
- •Posterior Mediastinal Mass Excision Operative Steps
- •Summary
- •References
- •34: Liver Transplantation
- •Introduction
- •Robotic Donor Hepatectomy
- •Patient Selection
- •Positioning
- •Port Placement
- •Instruments
- •Adjunct Robotic Instruments
- •Right Donor Hepatectomy
- •Falciform Dissection
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Demarcation
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •“Rubber Band” Retraction Technique
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •Closure
- •Left Donor Hepatectomy
- •Hilar Dissection
- •Demarcation
- •Parenchymal Transection
- •“Rubber Band” Retraction Technique
- •Parenchymal Transection

166
Fig. 14.5 Trocar
placement of the thoracic
phase. The red interrupted
line is the recommended
upper border for placement
of a trocar. The black
vertical line above the T5
shows the recommended
mini-thoracotomy site.
PAL posterior axillary line
E. Tagkalos and P. P. Grimminger
8mmHg and checking the operative site, T2 is placed in the 8th intercostal space (if
a robotic stapler is used, it is advisable to use the 12mm trocar), followed by T4in
the 4th intercostal space, facing the esophageal hiatus and slightly higher than T3
(this axis is very important for the placement of this trocar). Finally, T1 is placed
laterally to T2in the 10th intercostal space above the posterior axillary line. Try to
leave enough space between the robotic trocars to avoid collisions.
Instrument Placement
T1: Fenestrated tip-up grasper.
T2: Fenestrated bipolar forceps using the 8mm reduction cap and the robotic stapler
(Sureform→; 12mm).
T3: Camera.
T4: Vessel Sealer or SynchroSeal, monopolar hook or scissors.
Mobilization of the esophagus begins with an incision of the parietal pleura at
the inferior pulmonary ligament along the anterior esophageal border. The operative
plane is extended cranially in relation to the subcarinal lymph nodes, which should
be harvested with the specimen up to the azygos arch. Fine dissection of the pleura
should extend above the azygos arch. At this point, the right vagus nerve is the lateral border. For this step, the surgeon can be assisted by the assistant (try to position
the assistant’s instrument in the 6th row of your screen to avoid unnecessary movement) or the T1 (tip-up grasper) (Fig.14.6).
The azygos arch should be carefully prepared and the small bronchial artery
(posterolateral to the azygos vein) should be dissected. The monopolar hook or scissors are instruments that allow ne dissection up to this point. The azygos can be
resected at this point with Hem-o-lok (Telefex Medical, Weck Drive, NC) clips
(using T2) or with hand-held clips using T5 (Fig.14.7).
Try not to dissect the azygos vein too close to the chest wall as a stump of
2–3cm may provide better traction in the following steps. Alternatively, a handheld vascular stapler can be used. Once this step has been completed, the right
paratracheal lymph nodes can be dissected separately. The next step is to dissect
the pleura down to the esophageal hiatus. The plane should be extended parallel
to the azygos vein. The thoracic duct should be visualized and dissected at the
lower mediastinum (Fig.14.8).

ab
15 Robotic Esophagectomy
167
a
b
Fig. 14.6 Incision of the parietal pleura. (a) The interrupted line demonstrates the dissection
plane of the parietal pleural. (b) The dissection of the pleura below the azygos arch and the esophagus. (c) The completion of the pleural dissection below the azygos arch. (d) The caudal plane with
visualization of the thoracic duct
c
d
Fig. 14.7 The dissection of the azygos vein. (a) After clipping of the distal part. (b) The stump
can be used to facilitate a better visualization of the underlying tissue (the traction through T1
fenestrated tip-up grasper should be at the 12th hour of your screen)
The use of ICG can be helpful, but the medium should be injected into the inguinal lymph nodes before the abdominal part or into the jejunal lymph nodes during
the abdominal part (as shown in Fig.14.9).
When mobilizing the esophagus, try to identify small arteries coming from the
aorta, the left and right pulmonary veins, the left and right bronchus and the trachea.
When attempting to retrieve lymph nodes in the vicinity of important structures

168
ab
Fig. 14.8 The dissection of the thoracic duct. (a) The preparation and clipping of the distal part.
(b) The dissected thoracic duct after clipping the proximal part
E. Tagkalos and P. P. Grimminger
abc
Fig. 14.9 ICG visualization of the thoracic duct. (a) The medium is injected in the lymph nodes
of the jejunum during the abdominal phase. (b) The thoracic duct view in normal mode. (c) The
thoracic duct (green) after enabling the FireyTM mode of the da Vinci platform
such as those mentioned above, try to reduce the maximum current applied to the
tissue to avoid thermal damage to the airways. If possible, the vagus nerve should
be transected in relation to the cardiac branches. During this step, the T1 tip-up
grasper should be used to provide countertraction (12th hour of your screen). If
necessary, the assistant should apply traction to the 6th hour of your screen. The
next step is to prepare the subcarinal lymph nodes so that they can be retrieved en
bloc with the specimen. The assistant should gently compress the bronchial system
with an atraumatic instrument to facilitate better visualization of the fatty tissue
borders of the region (Fig.14.10).
The posterior mediastinal and supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes are also retrieved
en bloc with the specimen (damage to the airway should be avoided at this stage,
even if this means that the lymph nodes from this station have to be removed separately from the specimen). After mobilizing the distal part of the intrathoracic
esophagus from the diaphragm (and the crura, if not completely done during the
abdominal phase), the full mobilization of the esophagus is achieved. Subsequently,

15 Robotic Esophagectomy
Fig. 14.10 The dissection
of the subcarinal lymph
nodes
169
the dissection of the specimen at the level of the azygos vein can be performed. The
esophageal wall can be opened using monopolar scissors or hooks. After completing a purse string suture of the proximal end, externalize both suture ends via T5.
Secure the distal esophageal opening through T5 with a grasper. Attempt to ascend
the conduit into the thoracic cavity using gentle traction, maintaining contact with
the vessel end at all times. At this point, we will describe the end-to-side circular
anastomotic technique used in our clinic. As there is still no consensus on the ideal
anastomotic type for intrathoracic reconstruction, alternative anastomotic types
such as a linear stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis can be used. The robotic instruments are retrieved and the trocars are undocked. T5 is removed and a minithoracotomy is performed 2–3cm anterior and 2cm posterior to the epicenter of T5.
A wound protector is placed and the 25 or 28 mm anvil (CEEATM, Covidien,
Manseld, MA, USA) is passed through the mini-thoracotomy to the proximal end
of the esophagus, and the purse string is tightened. The specimen is then externalized through the mini-thoracotomy and the right angulation of the conduit is checked
(the stapler line along the lesser curvature should be opposite to the aorta). The
specimen is then partially externalized, a small incision is made at the end of the
lesser curvature at the stapler line, and the stapler shaft is inserted through the incision and brought into the thoracic cavity. The shaft pin of the stapler is exteriorized
cranially near the greater curvature of the gastric conduit. The shaft and anvil are
approximated under continuous visualization. Using a hand-held grasper through
T2, the fatty tissue of the greater omentum is removed from the anastomotic fronts
to avoid stapling this tissue into the anastomosis. The anastomosis is created and the
stapler removed. The specimen is divided using a linear stapler (Fig.14.11). Single
interrupted monolament sutures may be used to secure the anastomosis (alternatively a continuous barbed resorbable suture may be used). A pleural tent and the
use of a 180–270° omental ap can be further created around the anastomosis. The
trocars are removed and a chest tube is inserted through T1. Once the lung is fully
expanded, the mini-thoracotomy and wound are closed.

170
E. Tagkalos and P. P. Grimminger
a
b
c
Fig. 14.11 The intrathoracic circular-stapled end-to-side esophagogastrostomy. (a) The purse
string of the proximal end (esophagus) before the placement of the anvil. (b) The connection of the
anvil (esophagus) with the spike (gastric conduit). (c) The approximation of both ends. (d) The
dissection of the specimen via linear stapler. (e) A continuous barbed suture is placed at the anastomosis. (f) A pleural tent and a 270° omental ap are placed around the anastomosis
d
e
f
Robotic-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy
The fully robotic minimally invasive “one surgeon–one assistant” 4-arm transabdominal, transthoracic, and transcervical esophagectomy with D2 lymph node dissection with gastric pull-up reconstruction is presented. The three phases—thoracic,
abdominal, and cervical—are described. We recommend this procedure for tumors
located in the upper or upper/middle esophagus.
Thoracic Phase
The thoracic phase is the rst phase of the McKeown procedure. This phase shares
many steps with the thoracic phase of the Ivor-Lewis procedure described above. If
meticulous right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node dissection is
required, all trocars can be moved cranially in one intercostal space (9th, 7th, 5th,

15 Robotic Esophagectomy
171
and 3rd for the four robotic arms). After complete mobilization of the esophagus
below the azygos vein and completion of the lymphadenectomy in the middle and
lower mediastinum, the operation continues in the upper mediastinum.
Instrument Placement
T1: Fenestrated bipolar forceps.
T2: Camera.
T3: Monopolar hook or scissors.
T4: Tip-up fenestrated grasper.
The lymph nodes of the RLN are dissected. The parietal pleura should be incised
parallel to the right vagus nerve extending towards the right subclavian artery. This
is the recurrent point for the right RLN.These lymph nodes should be dissected
separately from the specimen.
Dissection of the left RLN is more difcult and requires good visualization of the
left RLN. The trachea should be gently rotated clockwise. The tip-up grasper
through T1 is used to retract the esophagus dorsally and the assistant will rotate the
trachea. The soft tissues of the left paratracheal space are carefully dissected, leaving the left RLN untouched. The ventral lymph nodes are dissected rst, followed
by the dorsal lymph nodes. The esophagus can then be safely mobilized to the thoracic outlet. A thoracic tube is placed and the wounds are closed.
Abdominal andCervical Phases
The abdominal phase described in the Ivor-Lewis section shares many similarities
to the McKeown abdominal phase. The patient is placed in the supine position with
the head slightly tilted to the right and the neck extended. To facilitate passage of the
specimen through the posterior mediastinum to the neck, it is advisable to divide the
specimen from the gastric conduit. The two ends can then be reattached with interrupted sutures (tip of the gastric conduit).
After creating the anastomosis in the cervical region (see below), the stomach
should be retracted in the abdomen for a few centimeters and the pylorus should be
close to the hiatus. This is the end of the abdominal phase.
It is clear that the cervical phase will begin before the end of the abdominal
phase, and this step can be also performed by a second surgical team. An incision
parallel and median to the medial border of the left sternocleidomastoid muscle
(approximately 4cm) should start from the jugulum and extend cranially. After dissecting the platysma, the dissection follows the layers to the thoracic inlet. At this
point, the cervical esophagus should be identied. A loop may be used to encircle
the esophagus for better traction. Once the cervical esophagus has been mobilized,
the specimen and conduit can be advanced to the neck. The cervical esophagus is
dissected and the specimen is retrieved. We perform a circular-stapled anastomosis,
but other techniques can be used for reconstruction (linear or hand-sewn anastomosis). The anastomosis can be further secured with interrupted absorbable

172
E. Tagkalos and P. P. Grimminger
monolament sutures. A small soft drainage is placed posterior to the anastomosis
and the wounds are closed with interrupted sutures (platysma and skin). The cervical phase is complete.
Good teamwork is essential for a successful robotic operation. A clear role for
each team member remains the cornerstone of a successful procedure. The use of
the robotic assistance may lead to further surgical precision and facilitate more
extended lymphadenectomies in the upper mediastinum. It is expected that the continuous technological development of the robotic systems as well as promising
robotic processes such as RACE (robotic-assisted transhiatal and transcervical
esophagectomy) could totally alter today standards.
References
1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, etal. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer. 2021;1
2. Lepage C, Drouillard A, Jouve JL, Faivre J.Epidemiology and risk factors for oesophageal
adenocarcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45(8):625–9.
3. Cho S.Fistulas between the esophagus and adjacent vital organs in esophageal cancer. Korean
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;53(4):211–6.
4. Zhong XQ, Li GX.Successful management of life-threatening aortoesophageal stula: a case
report and review of the literature. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(12):3814–21.
5. He LR, Qiao W, Liao ZX, Komaki R, Ho L, Hofstetter WL, etal. Impact of comorbidities and
use of common medications on cancer and non-cancer specic survival in esophageal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:1095.
6. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, etal. ESPEN guidelines
on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):11–48.
7. Valsangkar N, Salty HVN, Timsina L, Ceppa DP, Ceppa EP, Birdas TJ.Operative time in
esophagectomy: does it affect outcomes? Surgery. 2018;164(4):866–71.
8. Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Meredith K. Esophagectomy from then to now. J
Gastrointest Oncol. 2018;9(5):903–9.
9. Lai G, Guo N, Jiang Y, Lai J, Li Y, Lai R. Duration of one-lung ventilation as a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications after McKeown esophagectomy. Tumori.
2020;106(1):47–54.
10. Fabbi M, Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS.Anastomotic leakage after
esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: denitions, diagnostics, and treatment. Dis Esophagus.
2021;34(1):1.
11. In H, Palis BE, Merkow RP, Posner MC, Ferguson MK, Winchester DP, etal. Doubling of
30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy: a critical measure of outcomes for quality
improvement. Ann Surg. 2016;263(2):286–91.
12. Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling G,
et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg.
2019;269(2):291–8.
13. Haverkamp L, Seesing MF, Ruurda JP, Boone J, Hillegersberg RV.Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Dis
Esophagus. 2017;30(1):1–7.
14. de Groot EM, Goense L, Kingma BF, Haverkamp L, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R.Trends
in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer:
the 2022 update. Dis Esophagus. 2023;36(7):doac099.
15. Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D, etal. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(2):152–62.

15 Robotic Esophagectomy
16. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, etal.
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92.
17. van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, Schippers C, Brosens LAA, Joore HCA, etal.
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann
Surg. 2019;269(4):621–30.
18. Yang Y, Li B, Yi J, Hua R, Chen H, Tan L, Li H, He Y, Guo X, Sun Y, Yu B, Li
Z.Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized
controlled trial: the RAMIE Trial. Ann Surg. 2022;275(4):646–53.
19. Tagkalos E, van der Sluis PC, Berlth F, Poplawski A, Hadzijusufovic E, Lang H, van Berge
Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Müller-Stich BP, Ruurda JP, Schiesser M, Schneider PM, van
Hillegersberg R, Grimminger PP. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic
esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial). BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1060.
20. Tagkalos E, Grimminger P, Gao X, Chiu CH, Uzun E, Lang H, Wen YW, Chao YK.Incidence
and predictors of textbook outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: a twocenter study. Cancers. 2024;16:1109.
21. Hernandez JM, Dimou F, Weber J, etal. Dening the learning curve for robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1346–51.
22. Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Grosser R, etal. Attaining prociency in robotic-assisted minimally
invasive esophagectomy while maximizing safety during procedure development. Innovations.
2016;11(4):268–73.
23. van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, Goense L, van Hillegersberg R.Learning curve
for robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy: results from 312 cases.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(1):264–71.
24. Grimminger PP, Hadzijusufovic E, Babic B, van der Sluis PC, Lang H.Innovative fully
robotic 4-arm Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (RAMIE4). Dis Esophagus.
2020;33(3):doz015.
25. Grimminger PP, Hadzijusufovic E, Ruurda JP, Lang H, van Hillegersberg R.The da Vinci
Xi robotic four-arm approach for robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 2018a;66(5):407–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 0038- 1636933.
26. Grimminger PP, Hadzijusufovic E, Lang H. Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy
(RAMIE) with a standardized intrathoracic circular end-to-side stapled anastomosis and a
team of two (surgeon and assistant only). Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018b;66(5):404–6. https://
doi.org/10.1055/s- 0037- 1606198.
173

Robot-Assisted Partial andTotal
Gastrectomy
RajG.Vaghjiani
Introduction
On January 29, 1881, Theodor Billroth performed the rst successful gastric resection at his Viennese clinic which included the eponymous gastroenteric reconstruction [1]. Although previous surgeons had attempted such a complex procedure, this
was the rst case of a technical success (the patient reportedly passed away months
later from metastatic disease). Since this time, surgery of the stomach has advanced
tremendously taking into account not only the complex physiology of nutrient
digestion but also the mechanics of gastroenteric ow. Fast forward to over 100years
later in 1991, the rst laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy was described by Seigo
Kitano’s group [2]. Rapid advancements in both laparoscopic, and, more recently,
robotic techniques, have allowed for the continued adoption of minimally invasive
approaches to gastric resection.
This chapter will provide a brief synopsis of the indications for gastric resections
as well as a technical guide to a breadth of robot-assisted gastric resections and the
associated alimentary reconstructions. Although the majority of robot-assisted resections for GI malignancies in the United States are done with the Intuitive Surgical da
Vinci platform, the descriptions provided will attempt to highlight technical aspects
that could be easily translated to various platforms as well as upcoming iterations.
15
Indications
Gastric cancer remains a major source of worldwide cancer burden, accounting
for the fth most commonly diagnosed cancer as well as the fth leading cause
of cancer mortality [3]. As detailed investigations into the pathogenesis of gastric
R. G. Vaghjiani (*)
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
e-mail: rgvaghji@UTMB.EDU
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025
S. Samreen et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Robotic Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86927-3_15
175

176
R. G. Vaghjiani
adenocarcinoma have continued, the approach to management has simultaneously become more intricate, often entailing a multitude of therapies depending
on the stage of the malignancy at discovery [4]. Additionally, the ideal extent of
surgery as well as the associated lymphadenectomy continues to evolve, especially as different geographic cohorts are prone to variable incidence, detection,
and surgical capabilities. Finally, although gastric adenocarcinoma is often a
commonly discussed indication for robotic resections, the breadth of entities that
may be appropriate for a robotic approach include gastrointestinal stromal tumors
(GIST), neuroendocrine tumors, leiomyomas, sarcomas, polyps/adenomas, and
benign peptic disease. Specic extent of resection is beyond the scope of this
chapter; however, the application of the techniques would be for the most part
identical.
Positioning andPort Placement
For the vast majority of gastric resections, the patient can be positioned supine with
a 10–25 degree reverse Trendelenburg orientation. This can aid in upper gastrointestinal dissection, and thus the use of either a footboard or a split-leg table with
footrests should be applied. The robotic platform is located to the left of the patient
but with increasingly versatile systems, both a left-sided and right-sided approach
can be used. If there is the possibility that the gastric resection may extend into the
thorax and require an esophagogastrectomy, then a left-sided placement may allow
for an easy transition for the thoracic/lateral portion of the operation (Fig.15.1).
Fig. 15.1 (a) A reverse
Trendelenburg position can
aid in dissection of the
upper abdominal space and
hiatus. (b) Either a split leg
with foot rests or a straight
leg with footboard should
be used to allow for the
steep angle required. The
robot can be positioned
either to the left or right of
the patient with the arms in
extension
a
b
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
