- •Kiwi identity . Nicholas Tarling, The Essential Pocket Kiwi
- •Inventing national identity
- •Round-table discussion
- •Skinheads in Russia
- •Lamentable as I am at public speaking... By Simon Jenkins, the "Times"
- •Public speaking by Brian MacArthur
- •Oratory techniques 1 (by Michelle Lowe and Ben Graham, abridged)
- •"This was their finest hour"
- •MPs must guard against presidential power
- •I. Answer the questions:
- •II. Paraphrase or explain:
- •III. What means of emphasis are used in the speech?
- •IV. What softening or mitigating devices are used in the speech?
- •V. Talking points
- •Inversion
- •Inversion takes place:
- •Emphatic structures
- •Oratory techniques 2 (by Malcolm Kushner, abridged)
- •1. Material-Based Introduction
- •2. Audience-Centered Introductions
- •Introductory Speech
- •Oratory techniques 3 (by Malcolm Kushner, abridged) The Role of Nonverbal Communication
- •The power of public speaking
- •George Bush's Nomination Acceptance Speech
- •Честное ленинское Апология (in support of) политического косноязычия
- •The gettysburg address abraham lincoln
- •Inauguraladdress
- •Schoolboy politics Bush hits the wrong note at the un
- •A political show
- •Как строили свои речи знаменитые люди
- •If you're a liar, a bully or a cheat, then you too could be a great world leader Tracy McVeigh, the Observer
- •Another kind of leader (by Gloria Borger, us News & World Report)
- •Gladstone — a leader without equal Lord Jenkins assesses the fortunes of Britain's 51 Prime Ministers, the Times.
- •Founding rivalries More like squabbling brothers than "fathers", how did they succeed? (Jay Tolson, us News & World Report, abridged)
- •John adams (1735-1826)
- •Amazing greys (abridged from Punch) Peter Freedman champions the politicians who dare to be dull.
- •Better a tricky dicky than a grey man in a grey suit By John Humphrys, the Sunday Times (abridged)
Public speaking by Brian MacArthur
Oratory has always been a declining art. Every generation judges contemporary speakers unfavorably against the giants of the past. According to Peggy Noonan, author of some of Ronald
Reagan's most memorable oratory, the irony of modern speeches is that as our ability to disseminate them has exploded, their quality has declined.
Why? Lots of reasons, including that we as a nation no longer learn the rhythms of public utterance from Shakespeare and the Bible. When young Lincoln was sprawled in front of the fireplace reading Julius Caesar — "The abuse of greatness is, when it disjoins remorse from power", —he was, unconsciously, learning to be a poet. You say, "That was Lincoln, not the common man". But the common man was flocking to the docks to get the latest installment of Dickens off the ship from England.
Modern politicians don't really know what "the common man" thinks any more, they forget that we've all had at least some education and a number of us read on our own and read certain classics in junior school and high school. The guy at the gas station read The Call of the Wild when he was fourteen, and sometimes thinks about it. Moreover he has imagination. Politicians forget. They go in for the lowest possible denominator — like a newscaster. Speeches today are prepared only for the "sound bites" demanded by television.
However, oratory still flourishes but the style of oratory is changing. The sense of drama, that still attends a major speech, is captured by Peggy Noonan. "A speech is a soliloquy", she says, "one man on a bare stage with a big spotlight. He will tell us who he is and what he wants and how he will get it and what it means when he does or does not get it.... He looks up at us in the balconies and clears his throat. "Ladies and gentlemen...." We lean forward, hungry to hear. Now it will be said, now we will hear the thing we long for. A speech is part theatre and part political declaration; it is personal communication between a leader and his people; it is art, and all art is a paradox, being at once a thing of great power and great delicacy. A speech is poetry: cadence, rhythm, imagery, sweep! Speeches are important because they are one of the great constants of our political history. They have been not only the way we measure public men, they have been how we tell each other who we are... They count. They more than count, they shape what happens."
Amidst the lazy illiteracy of so much modern speech, eloquent words still have power to make audiences stop and think and sometimes even wonder. Our political leaders still search for the writers who can gild their prosaic visions.
Comprehension and discussion questions:
What is Peggy Noonan famous for?
Who does the author mean by using pronouns "we" and "you" in the second paragraph of the article?
Why is oratory art? In what direction is it going?
How important are political speeches in American political history? Why?
How important are political speeches in British and Russian political history? Why?
Exeircise 9
Explain who/what the people mentioned in the article were: William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln, Charles Dickens, Ronald Reagan. What are they famous for?
Who wrote "The Call of the Wild"? What is it about?
Exeircise 10
Interpret the following.
But the common man was flocking to the docks ...
They go in for the lowest possible denominator — like a newscaster.
Speeches today are prepared only for the sound bites.
Our political leaders still search for the writers who can gild their prosaic visions.
Exeircise 11
In the article find the antonyms for the following words. Think of the synonyms.
flourishing, rising
to collect, pick up, assemble
outstanding, distinguished
to unite, merge
senior, elder
to degenerate into, decline
learning, education
Exercise 12
Translate into English using the new words and phrases.
Русская православная церковь, находившаяся в упадке еще несколько лет назад, сейчас процветает.
Политическая проницательность Линкольна была подтверждена всем ходом американской истории.
Защитники окружающей среды используют каждую возможность, чтобы распространять свои идеи.
Exercise 13
Write a composition: "The attributes of a competent public speaker".
Workshop II. ANALYZING RHETORIC
Read the following, sum it up and explain how you can make your speech convincing.