- •Isbn БарГу, 2010 Введение
- •Оглавление
- •1. Semantic structure of the word and its change Topics for discussion:
- •2. Types of word—meaning.
- •3. Polysemy. Semantic structure of words. Meaning and context.
- •4. Change of word—meaning: the causes, nature and results.
- •1. Provide answers to the following questions:
- •2. Comment on the following l. Bloomfield’s quotation. What phenomenon is described?
- •2. Homonymy Topics for discussion:
- •2. Sources of homonyms.
- •Compulsory tasks and exercises:
- •Consider your answers to the following questions:
- •2. Classify the following homonyms into lexical, lexico-grammatical and grammatical homonyms:
- •4. Find perfect homonyms in the sentences and translate them into Russian. State whether they are complete or partial, lexical or lexico-grammatical homonyms.
- •Additional exercises:
- •Choose the correct word:
- •State the meaning and origin of the perfect homonyms. Translate them into Russian.
- •Transcribe the following homographs. State their different meanings and use them in sentences of your own.
- •Find homonyms in the following extracts. Classify them into homonyms proper, homographs and homophones.
- •On what linguistic phenomenon is the joke in the following extracts based? What causes the misunderstanding?
- •A) Classify the following italicized homonyms. Use Professor a.I. Smirnitsky's classification system.
- •Find perfect homonyms in the following sentences and translate them into Russian. State whether they are complete or partial, lexical or lexical-grammatical homonyms.
- •Provide homonyms for the italicized words in the following jokes and extracts and classify them according to Professor a.I. Smirnitsky's classification system.
- •Explain how the following italicized words became homonyms.
- •Do the following italicized words represent homonyms or polysemantic words? Explain reasons for your answers.
- •3. Word-formation and word-strukture Topics for discussion:
- •6. Conversion. Typical semantic relations. Productivity.
- •9. Ways and means of enriching the vocabulary: productive word—formation, various ways of word—creation, semantic extension, borrowing.
- •10. Neologisms: semantic groups, ways of forming.
- •Compulsory exercises:
- •1. Consider your answers to the following questions:
- •Read the following text and answer the questions:
- •Leonard Bloomfield Language Morphology
- •The Prefix tells the number
- •Find cases of conversion in the following sentences.
- •Explain the semantic correlations within the following pairs of words.
- •Identify the neutral compounds in the word combinations given below and write them out in 3 columns:
- •Read and translate the word-combinations. Pay attention to the stress.
- •Translate the the following reduplicative compounds. Memorize them. Comment on their formation.
- •Classify the words given below according to the word-formation types (affixation, conversion, compounding, clipping, blending, acronymy, back-formation):
- •Define the particular type of word-building process by which the following words were formed:
- •Additional exercises:
- •Read the following texts and answer the questions:
- •V. Derivation by a zero morpheme The term 'zero-derivation'
- •VI. Backderivation
- •IX. Clipping
- •X. Blending and word-manufacturing
- •2. Read the following text and answer the questions:
- •Charles Hockett a course in modern linguistics Morphemes
- •3. Read the following text and answer the questions:
- •Arthur g. Kennedy Current English Chapter VIII. Conversion and confusion of the parts of speech
- •A. Conversion
- •Deduce the meanings of the following derivatives from the meanings of their constituents. Explain your deduction. What are the meanings of the affixes in the words under examination?
- •In the following examples the italicized words are formed from the same root by means of different affixes. Translate these derivatives into Russian and explain the difference in meaning.
- •Name the English affixes of negation, resemblance, state and quality. Find the correlative affixes in Byelorussian, Russian (use supplementary material).
- •Give nouns corresponding to the verbs and adjectives. Transcribe these words and translate them into Russian.
- •Which of the two words in the following pairs is made by conversion? Deduce the meanings and use them in constructing sentences of your own.
- •Compare the sentences. Translate them into Russian.
- •One of the italicized words in the following examples was made from the other by conversion. What semantic correlations exist between them?
- •Read the following joke; explain the type of word-building in the italicized words.
- •Find compounds in the following jokes and extracts and write them out in three columns:
- •Identify the compounds in the word-groups below. Say as much as you can about their structure and meaning.
- •Say whether the following lexical units are word-groups or compounds. Apply the criteria outlined in the foregoing text to motivate your answer.
- •Find shortenings in the jokes and extracts given below and specify the method of their formation.
- •Comment on the formation of the words given below. Use them in sentences of your own.
- •What is the type of word-building by which the italicized words in the following extracts were made?
- •4. Semantic classifications of words. Synonymy. Antonymy
- •4. Paradigmatic relations of inclusion (hierarchical relations): hyponymy, meronymy, serial relations).
- •5. Groups of words based on several types of semantic relations: conceptual (semantic or lexical) fields, lexical—semantic groups.
- •Compulsory exercises:
- •Consider your answers to the following questions:
- •Read the following poem and state the source of its humorous effect. What lexicological problems are raised in it? What does the author accuse linguistic sciences of?
- •Read the following text and answer the questions:
- •Stephen Ullmann Semantics. An introduction to the science of meaning Chapter 6. Synonymy
- •Find the dominant synonym in the following groups of synonyms. Explain your choice.
- •Arrange the following ideographic synonyms according to their degree of intensity. Translate them into Russian. Use them in sentences of your own.
- •Classify, the following synonyms in two columns according to:
- •Find the euphemistic substitutes for the following words: Write them out into two columns: a. Euphemistic substitutes for social taboos. B. Euphemistic substitutes for superstitious taboos.
- •Give derivational antonyms to the words.
- •Change the sentences so that they express the contrary meaning by using antonyms. State whether they are absolute or derivational.
- •State the hyperonym for the following words:
- •How does the semantic field of kinship in English differ from that in Belarusian (Russian)? Find the correspondences and differences.
- •Read the following texts and answer the questions:
- •R.H. Robins General linguistics. An introductory survey
- •The sentences given below contain synonyms. Write them out in groups and explain the difference where the words are familiar.
- •Give as many synonyms for the italicized words in the following jokes as you can. If you do not know any of them consult your dictionaries.
- •Single out the denotative and connotative components of meanings of the synonyms in the examples given below.
- •From the sentences given below write out synonyms in groups and classify them into:
- •Write out synonymic groups and classify them into:
- •Within the following synonymic groups single out words with emotive connotations.
- •Define the types of connotations found in the following synonyms.
- •Do the italicized words possess stylistic connotations? If so, what are their stylistic characteristics?
- •Identify the stylistic connotations for the following italicized words in the jokes given below and write their synonyms with other stylistic connotations.
- •Prove that the rows of words given below are synonyms. Use the semantic criterion to justify your opinion.
- •Find the dominant synonyms for the following italicized words and prove that they can be used as substitutes. Are they interchangeable? What is lost if we make the substitution?
- •Say why the italicized synonyms in the examples given below are not interchangeable.
- •Find the euphemisms in the following sentences and jokes. Name the words for which they serve as euphemistic substitutes.
- •Point out antonyms indicating place, direction, time, quality, and quantity from the pairs of antonyms given below, translate them into Russian. Use these antonyms in sentences of your own.
- •Find antonyms to the words given below.
- •Find antonyms in the following jokes and extracts and describe the resultant stylistic effect.
- •5. Phraseology in modern english Topics for discussion:
- •2. Distinction between free word—groups and phraseological units. Criteria of phraseology.
- •3. Classification of phraseological units.
- •Compulsory tasks and exercises:
- •Consider your answers to the following questions:
- •Give Russian equivalents to the phraseological units. Memorize them and use them in speech.
- •What is the source of the following idioms? If in doubt consult a dictionary.
- •Shakespeare's plays provide us with many idiomatic expressions. What is the meaning of each of the following? Match up the phraseological units with their definitions.
- •Complete the following phraseological units so that the whole unit should alliterate (the desired meaning is given in the Russian translation in brackets.)
- •Fill in the missing verb. Choose from the box, using each verb once only.
- •Pick out all the phraseological units from the following sentences and state which of them are (1) fusions, (2) unities, (3) word combinations.
- •In the examples given below identify the phraseological units and classify them on the semantic principle.
- •Read the following jokes. Classify the italicized word-groups, using Professor a.I. Smirnitsky's classification system for phraseological units. Out of the Fire into the Frying Pan
- •More Precise
- •Additional exercises:
- •Match up the definitions on the left (a-g) with the correct phraseological unit on the right (1-7).
- •Complete the sentences by choosing an ending from a-l.
- •Complete the following similes. Translate the phraseological units into Russian. If necessary, use your dictionary.
- •True or false? Say whether the phraseological units in the following sentences are used correctly (true) or incorrectly (false).
- •Complete the paired phraseological units in the sentences below. Choose from the following:
- •Choose the animal, the bird, the fish. Fill in the missing words from the sentences below. Choose from the box, using plural forms where necessary.
- •Choose the part of the body. Fill in the missing words from the list of words below, using plural forms where necessary.
- •From the list given at the end of this exercise, choose phraseological units which correspond to the ones printed in bold
- •In the sentences given below. Is there any difference between them (in meaning, in style, etc.)?
- •A) Comment on the following phraseological units as reflecting various kinds of human activities and pastimes. Explain their figurative meaning.
- •Substitute phraseological units incorporating the names of colours for the italicized words.
- •Give English equivalents of the proverbs and phraseological units. Explain their meaning and use them in sentences of your own.
- •Read the following text. Compile a list of the phraseological units used in it. Classify them according to Academician Vinogradov's classification system for phraseological units.
- •Group the following italicized phraseological units, using Professor a.V. Koonin's classification system. Translate them into Russian.
- •14. State what ideas the following groups of phraseological units express.
- •Give as many phraseological units as possible, using any of the following words:
- •6. Fundamentals of english lexicography Topics for discussion:
- •2. Classification of dictionaries. Encyclopedic and linguistic dictionaries.
- •3. Main problems of dictionary-compiling.
- •4. Learner's dictionaries: their characteristics and problems of their compilation.
- •Compulsory tasks and exercises:
- •Consider your answers to the following questions:
- •Read the following text and answer the questions:
- •Mitford m. Mathews Meanings and Etymologies
- •Pay attention to some widely used abbreviations:
- •State the type of the following dictionaries:
- •Characterize the dictionaries (ex. 3) according to the model:
- •Characterize the given dictionaries according to the model (Compulsory tasks and exercises, ex. 4):
- •Compare the dictionary entries in synchronic and diachrontc dictionaries.
- •Make sure you understand the meaning of the following terms which are used in English dictionaries. Find the equivalents in Russian:
- •7. Variants and dialects of the english language
- •2. Local varieties of English on the British Isles and in the usa.
- •3. British and American English.
- •Compulsory exercises:
- •Consider your answers to the following questions:
- •Give the British equivalents for the following Americanisms.
- •Explain the differences in the meanings of the following words in American and British English.
- •Identify the etymology of the following words.
- •The text includes some words used in American English. Find them and give the British English words.
- •Give synonyms for the following American shortenings. Describe the words from the stylistic point of view.
- •The American words in the sentences below are printed in italics. Replace each American word or phrase with a British word or phrase from the following list.
- •The American words in the sentences below are printed in italics. Replace each American word or phrase with a British word or phrase from the following list.
- •Read the following extract and give more examples illustrating the same group of Americanisms. What do we call this group?
- •Read the following passage. Draw up a list of terms denoting the university teaching staff in Great Britain and in the usa. What are the corresponding Russian terms?
- •Comment on the formation of the following words.
- •In the following sentences find the examples of words which are characteristic of American English. State whether they belong to the group of:
- •Read the following extract. Explain the difference in the meanings of the italicized words in American and British English.
- •Read the following passage. Do you share Professor Quirk's opinion about neutralizing the differences between the two forms of English? If so, give your own examples to prove it.
- •Write the following words according to the British norms of spelling.
- •Write the following words according to the American norms of spelling.
- •Read the following passage. Give some more examples illustrating the differences in grammar between the two varieties оf English.
- •Read the following extract. What is a citizen of the usa called? Analyse the suggested variants of names from the point of view of word-building.
- •8. Etymological survey of the english word-stock Topics for discussion:
- •4. Interrelation between native and borrowed elements. Influence of borrowings. International words. Etymological doublets.
- •Compulsory tasks and exercises:
- •Provide answers to the following questions:
- •Read the following text and answer the questions after it.
- •Charles f. Hockett
- •A Course in modern linguistics
- •The conditions for borrowing
- •47.2. Individual and Mass Effect.
- •47.3. Conditions for Borrowing
- •47.4. The Prestige Motive
- •47.5. The Need-Filling Motive
- •Kinds of loans
- •48.2. Loanwords
- •Grammatical change
- •Alternation Change
- •Phonemic and Phonetic Change
- •48.3. Loanshifts
- •48.4. Loanblends
- •49.2. The Impact of Borrowing on a Language
- •51.4. Analogy and Borrowing.
- •Translate the following into Russian. State from what languages the following expressions and shortenings are borrowed:
- •What are main ideas of the following texts? Give a short summary (5 sentences) of the texts.
- •Ch. V. The French (Extract)
- •George McKnight English words and their background Tropes (Extract)
- •Read the following text and answer the questions:
- •What is the difference between the words in the following pairs? Analyze the examples and prove that etymological and stylistic characteristics of words are closely interrelated.
- •Study the map of Great Britain and write out the names of the cities and towns ending in:
- •Think of 10-15 examples of Russian borrowings in English and English borrowings in Russian.
- •State the origin of the following etymological doublets. Compare their meanings and explain why they are called etymological doublets.
- •9. English leical units. Their characteristics. Types of naming Topics for discussion:
- •1. The morpheme as the smallest meaningful language unit. Classifications of morphemes.
- •2. The word as the basic unit of the language system. Characteristics of words. Structural types of words. Word—groups. The notion of a lexeme.
- •3. Types of naming.
- •Compulsory tasks and exercises:
- •Provide answers to the following questions:
- •Read the extract and answer the questions. Be ready to sum it up. How large is the English lexicon?
- •Do the following test choosing the correct answer(s):
- •Additional exercises:
- •Define the type of nomination realised in the lexical units.
- •Analyze the type of motivation in the following lexical units.
- •Analyze the following lexical units according to their structure. Speak about bound morphemes and free morphemes.
- •Supplementary material
- •1. Affixes
- •1.1. Prefixes
- •1.1.1. Prefixes of Germanic Origin Which Still Exist as Separate Words
- •1.1.2. Prefixes of Romanic Origin
- •1.1.3. Prefixes of Germanic Origin
- •1.1.4. Prefixes of Greek Origin
- •2. Suffixes
- •2.1. Noun Suffixes of Germanic Origin
- •2.2. Noun Suffixes of Romanic Origin
- •2.3. Noun Suffixes of Greek Origin
- •2.4. Adjective Suffixes of Germanic Origin
- •2.5. Adjective Suffixes of Romanic Origin
- •2.6. Verb Suffixes
- •2.7. Adverb Suffixes
- •3. Words from British and American culture
- •4. New words
- •5. Adjectives formed from stems different from those of the corresponding nouns
- •6. Etymological doublets
- •7. Blends
- •8. Euphemisms
- •9. Archaisms
- •10. Full Americanisms
- •11. Native American Words
- •12. American counterparts of English words
- •13. Exercises for Self-control Etymological Survey of the English Word-stock
- •The Study of Meaning The Stylistic Differentiation of the English Vocabulary
- •Word-structure
- •Variants and Dialects of the English Language
- •14. Keys to the Exercises
- •Variants and Dialects of the English Language
- •Список использованных источников
- •Лексикология современного английского языка (практикум) Учебно-методическое пособие
- •225404 Г. Барановичи, ул. Войкова, 21
2. Read the following text and answer the questions:
What is Hockett's definition of morphemes?
What is Hockett's procedure of determining morphemes?
Does Hockett make any difference between morphemes and inflectional endings?
What does Hockett understand by a grammatical form?
What difference does Hockett see between a grammatical form and a morpheme?
Charles Hockett a course in modern linguistics Morphemes
14.1. Definition. If the utterances of a language consisted merely of arrangements of phonemes, there would be no point in speaking or in listening. But people do speak and listen, and their oral communication transmits information and instructions and serves to coordinate their activities. That utterances can serve in this way is because they have another kind of structure in addition to the phonemic, one, a structure in terms of morphemes.
Morphemes are the smallest individually meaningful elements in the utterances of a language.
To illustrate, we shall examine the following English sentence:
John treats his older sisters very nicely.
In order to determine the morphemes of which this sentence is composed, we pull out any portion and ask the following questions about it:
(I) Does the portion recur in various utterances, with approximately the same meaning? If the answer is no, then the portion we have chosen to examine is of no use to us, and we try another. If the answer is yes, then the portion is tentatively a grammatical form (or, for short, simply a form), but not necessarily a single morpheme. (It is unfortunate that we must include "tentatively" in the preceding statement, especially since the reasons for the reservation cannot be explained until § 19. In the meantime we shall proceed as though no reservation had been expressed.)
(II) Can the form be broken into smaller pieces, each of which recurs with approximately the same meaning, in such a way that the meaning of the whole form is related to the meanings of the smaller pieces? If the answer is yes, then the form is larger than a single morpheme (is a composite form) and we must subject each of the pieces, in turn, to the same two-step examination. But if the answer is no, then the form is itself a single morpheme.
Thus each portion we choose is shown, by Test I, to be either a bad choice or a grammatical form, and each grammatical form is shown, by Test II, to be either a composite form or a morpheme. By a series of such operations, we can discover all the morphemes of an utterance.
Let us apply the tests to the following extracts from our sample sentence: [ja], [jan + tr], [owldər] and [sistər].
The first portion, [ja], fails Test I. It recurs, true enough — for example, in Jobs are scarce here, He's a jolly old man, Two jars of shaving cream. But we detect no common feature of meaning in these utterances which could reasonably be assigned to the recurrent portion [ja].
The second portion also fails Test I. The portion recurs: John traded his watch for a pencil. If John tries that he'll fail. From the broken demijohn trickled a stream of wine. But the requirement of similarity of meaning is not satisfied.
Test I is quickly passed by [owldər]. Its meaning in the original sentence is certainly much the same as in such sentences as He is older than I; The older of the two is a girl; I do declare, I'm getting older every day! In order to apply Test II, we must decide how to break [owldər] up into smaller pieces. If we were working with an alien language we might have to test many alternatives — say [ow] and [ldər], [owl] and [dər], and so on. Since we control English natively we can avoid this complication and proceed immediately to the cut which we feel will yield positive results: [owld] and [ər]. The former recurs, with reasonably constant meaning, in such sentences as He's an old man, He's the oldest of their three children, Jack is quite an active oldster. And the latter recurs in such sentences as When I was younger I enjoyed such things more, You should learn to enjoy the finer things of life. The evidence seems quite clear: older is more than one morpheme.
Similar testing of [owld] and [ər] shows that each is only a single morpheme; older, then, is exactly two morphemes.
Finally [sistər]. This quickly passes Test I: My sister Eileen; OK, sister, get moving!; Sister Angela will be here in a moment. Turning to Test II, once again we have to decide what break-up to try. Let us first try sist-and -er, if only because this is much like the cut of older which proved fruitful.
Now there can be no doubt but that the string of phonemes [sist] occurs in environments other than those in which it is immediately followed by [ər], and it is equally obvious that the latter occurs where it is not preceded by [sıst]. Thus, for [sıst], we have He has a cyst which must be removed; I have a system, I can't lose; Whipped cream consists largely of air; I don't mean to insist. And for [ər], in addition to the examples given earlier, we could find sentences involving brother, father, mother, daughter; hammer, butter, fetter, wither; singer, writer, actor, better.
But this is not enough. We get into trouble on the score of meaning, just as we did with the portions [ja] and [jan + tr] which we tested first. There seems to be no reasonable similarity of meaning between the sist-of sister and any of the other [sıst]'s illustrated. The words sister, brother, father, mother, daughter are all kinship terms, which means that they share some feature of meaning; on this basis one might want to extract the element -er as a morpheme carrying this shared feature of meaning. However, to do so leaves us not only with a [sıst] which — in this meaning — seems not to recur, but also with similarly forlorn elements [brəd], [fəd], [mad] and [dot]. Thus it seems reasonable to conclude that sister should not be regarded as a combination of smaller forms sist-and -er.
No other way of cutting sister into smaller pieces seems to have even the partial justification which we have found above for the cut into sist-and -er. We therefore decide to accept sister as a single morpheme.
Proceeding in this same way with all the different parts of our original sentence, we arrive finally at the following list of the constituent morphemes:
(1) John [jan]
(2) treat [trıjt]
(3) -s [s]
(4) hi-[ı]
(5) -s [z]
(6) old [owld]
(7) -er [ər]
(8) sister [sıstər]
(9) -s [z]
(10) very [verıj]
(11) nice [najs]
(12) -ly [lıj]
(13) [3 2 22].
Note the following points:
First, the intonation must not be overlooked; we have taken it as a single separate morpheme.
Second, (5) and (9) are phonemically the same, but certainly not the same morpheme, because of the difference in meaning.
Third, the breakdown of his [ız] into hi-[ı] and -s [z] may seem unconvincing. The [z] recurs, with exactly the same meaning, in John's book, the men's room, and the like. But the [ı] recurs only in him (as in hit 'im).
If this evidence is enough to persuade us to break up (h)is, then maybe we want to break up very top, into a ver-which recurs in verity, veritable, perhaps veracious, and an element -y which recurs in pretty (pretty well) and perhaps elsewhere.
Marginal uncertainties of this sort are to be expected -in any language, not just in English. They must not be allowed to disturb us too much. Most problems of whether to cut or not are answered easily and quickly. Where there is conflict of evidence, it is often not very important which alternative we choose. The uncertainties lie in the nature of language, rather than in our method of attack.