III. Agree or disagree with the statements:

1. Educated individuals often migrate from rich countries to poor countries.

2. This movement has positive effects for both capital-rich countries and labor-rich countries.

3. When workers migrate, their early care and education generally benefit the country where they move to work.

4. When workers have health problems or retire, their care and retirement pension will typically be paid in the former country.

5. “Brain drain” means that the most talented individuals depart for education or opportunity to another country.

6. The economic impact of immigration to any country is generally considered to be negative.

7. The ability to have mobility with regards to where people want to move and work is a part of their human capital.

8. Being able to move from one area to the next is a necessity and a duty.

9. To restrict people from doing so would be to inherently lower their human capital.

10. Educated individuals often migrate from one country to another seeking opportunity.

IV. Answer the questions:

1. What is mobility between nations?

2. Why do educated individuals migrate?

3. What terms can be used to name mobility between nations?

4. Is mobility between nations good or bad phenomena to your mind?

5. Is there mobility between nations in your country?

V. Match the first part of the sentence (1-5) with the second one (a-e).

1	Being able to move from one area to the next	a	to rich countries seeking opportunity.
2	The ability to have mobility with regards to where people want to move and work	b	the wage rate for those who do not emigrate.
3	Educated individuals often migrate from poor countries	c	is ability and a benefit of having human capital.
4	When workers migrate, their early care and education	d	is a part of their human capital.
5	The loss of labour in the old country also increases	e	generally benefit the country where they move to work.

VI. Make up a plan of the text.

VII. Retell the text in a written form (in English or Ukrainian). Text 62. Classification of international law

I. Read and memorize the following words and word combinations:

To employ – наймати, to fail – зазнавати невдачі, tension – напруженість, to enforce – примушувати, internal – внутрішній, to grant – дарувати.

II. Listen to the text: Classification of International Law

There are two main kinds of international law: private and public. The private law concerns the role of foreign laws within a particular country. For example, if an Englishman wants to sell property he owns in France to another Englishman, any English court must consider French Law. Public international law, on the other hand, deals with relations between states.

A typical problem in public international law would be an examination of the circumstances in which State A was entitled to employ force against State B. Public international law is generally thought to have developed in Western Europe in the 16-th and 17-th centuries as the autonomous secular state became the basic political unit. International law or the law of nations, as it was then described, developed in order to provide basic rules adequate to regulate relations between nations.

Most international law was created in the twenties century. The Leaguer of Nations was set up after World War I to regulate disputes between nations. However, it failed to stop the tension that led to World War II, partly because some powerful countries did not join (U.S.) and others left when they disagreed with its decisions (Germany, Japan).

There are some important differences between international laws and those created inside individual states. Domestic laws are passed by legislative bodies, most of which have some popular political support. International Laws, on the other hand, are created by agreements among governments. Enforcement of international law is also different. Many international agreements are not binding – for example, UN General Resolution.