Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
framework_en.pdf
Скачиваний:
68
Добавлен:
14.02.2016
Размер:
1.16 Mб
Скачать

Common Reference Levels

In order to orient learners, teachers and other users within the educational system for some practical purpose, however, a more detailed overview is likely to be necessary. Such an overview can be presented in the form of a grid showing major categories of language use at each of the six levels. The example in Table 2 (on the next two pages) is a draft for a self-assessment orientation tool based on the six levels. It is intended to help learners to profile their main language skills, and decide at which level they might look at a checklist of more detailed descriptors in order to self-assess their level of proficiency.

For other purposes, it may be desirable to focus on a particular spectrum of levels, and a particular set of categories. By restricting the range of levels and categories covered to those relevant to a particular purpose, it will be possible to add more detail: finer levels and categories. Such detail would enable a set of modules to be ‘mapped’ relative to one another – and also to be situated in relation to the Common Framework.

Alternatively, rather than profiling categories of communicative activities, one may wish to assess a performance on the basis of the aspects of communicative language competence one can deduce from it. The chart in Table 3 was designed to assess spoken performances. It focuses on different qualitative aspects of language use.

3.4Illustrative descriptors

The three tables used to introduce the Common Reference Levels (Tables 1, 2 and 3) are summarised from a bank of ‘illustrative descriptors’ developed and validated for the CEF in the research project described in Appendix B. These formulations have been mathematically scaled to these levels by analysing the way in which they have been interpreted in the assessment of large numbers of learners.

For ease of consultation, scales of descriptors are juxtaposed to the relevant categories of the descriptive scheme in Chapters 4 and 5. The descriptors refer to the following three metacategories in the descriptive scheme:

Communicative activities

‘Can Do’ descriptors are provided for reception, interaction and production. There may not be descriptors for all sub-categories for every level, since some activities cannot be undertaken until a certain level of competence has been reached, whilst others may cease to be an objective at higher levels.

Strategies

‘Can Do’ descriptors are provided for some of the strategies employed in performing communicative activities. Strategies are seen as a hinge between the learner’s resources (competences) and what he/she can do with them (communicative activities). The principles of a) planning action, b) balancing resources and compensating for deficiencies during execution and c) monitoring results and undertaking repair as necessary are described in the sections dealing with interaction and production strategies in Chapter 4.

25

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment

Table 2. Common Reference Levels: self-assessment grid

 

 

A1

A2

B1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Listening

I can recognise familiar

I can understand phrases

I can understand the main

 

 

words and very basic

and the highest frequency

points of clear standard

 

 

phrases concerning

vocabulary related to areas

speech on familiar matters

 

 

myself, my family and

of most immediate personal

regularly encountered in

U

 

immediate concrete

relevance (e.g. very basic

work, school, leisure, etc. I

 

surroundings when

personal and family

can understand the main

N

 

 

people speak slowly

information, shopping,

point of many radio or TV

D

 

 

and clearly.

local area, employment).

programmes on current

E

 

 

 

I can catch the main point in

affairs or topics of personal

R

 

 

 

 

short, clear, simple messages

or professional interest when

S

 

 

 

 

and announcements.

the delivery is relatively slow

T

 

 

 

 

 

and clear.

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N

Reading

I can understand

I can read very short, simple

I can understand texts that

D

 

familiar names, words

texts. I can find specific,

consist mainly of high

I

 

 

and very simple

predictable information in

frequency everyday or job-

N

 

 

sentences, for example

simple everyday material

related language. I can

G

 

 

on notices and posters

such as advertisements,

understand the description of

 

 

 

 

or in catalogues.

prospectuses, menus and

events, feelings and wishes in

 

 

 

timetables and I can

personal letters.

 

 

 

understand short simple

 

 

 

 

personal letters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spoken

I can interact in a simple

I can communicate in simple

I can deal with most situations

 

Interaction

way provided the other

and routine tasks requiring a

likely to arise whilst travelling

 

 

person is prepared to

simple and direct exchange of

in an area where the language

 

 

repeat or rephrase things

information on familiar topics

is spoken. I can enter

 

 

at a slower rate of speech

and activities. I can handle

unprepared into conversation

 

 

and help me formulate

very short social exchanges,

on topics that are familiar, of

S

 

what I’m trying to say. I

even though I can’t usually

personal interest or pertinent

 

can ask and answer simple

understand enough to keep

to everyday life (e.g. family,

P

 

 

questions in areas of

the conversation going myself.

hobbies, work, travel and

E

 

 

immediate need or on

 

current events).

A

 

 

 

very familiar topics.

 

 

K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I

Spoken

I can use simple phrases

I can use a series of phrases

I can connect phrases in a

N

Production

and sentences to describe

and sentences to describe in

simple way in order to describe

G

 

where I live and people I

simple terms my family and

experiences and events, my

 

 

 

 

know.

other people, living

dreams, hopes and ambitions.

 

 

 

conditions, my educational

I can briefly give reasons and

 

 

 

background and my present

explanations for opinions and

 

 

 

or most recent job.

plans. I can narrate a story or

 

 

 

 

relate the plot of a book or

 

 

 

 

film and describe my reactions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Writing

I can write a short, simple

I can write short, simple notes

I can write simple connected

W

 

postcard, for example

and messages relating to

text on topics which are

 

sending holiday greetings.

matters in areas of immediate

familiar or of personal interest.

R

 

 

I can fill in forms with

need. I can write a very simple

I can write personal letters

I

 

 

personal details, for

personal letter, for example

describing experiences and

T

 

 

example entering my

thanking someone for

impressions.

I

 

 

name, nationality and

something.

 

N

 

 

 

address on a hotel

 

 

G

 

 

 

 

registration form.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

Common Reference Levels

 

 

 

B2

C1

C2

 

 

 

I can understand extended speech

I can understand extended speech

I have no difficulty in understanding

and lectures and follow even

even when it is not clearly

any kind of spoken language,

complex lines of argument provided

structured and when relationships

whether live or broadcast, even when

the topic is reasonably familiar. I

are only implied and not signalled

delivered at fast native speed,

can understand most TV news and

explicitly. I can understand

provided I have some time to get

current affairs programmes. I can

television programmes and films

familiar with the accent.

understand the majority of films in

without too much effort.

 

standard dialect.

 

 

 

 

 

I can read articles and reports

I can understand long and

I can read with ease virtually all

concerned with contemporary

complex factual and literary

forms of the written language,

problems in which the writers adopt

texts, appreciating distinctions of

including abstract, structurally or

particular attitudes or viewpoints. I

style. I can understand specialised

linguistically complex texts such as

can understand contemporary

articles and longer technical

manuals, specialised articles and

literary prose.

instructions, even when they do

literary works.

 

not relate to my field.

 

 

 

 

I can interact with a degree of

I can express myself fluently and

I can take part effortlessly in any

fluency and spontaneity that makes

spontaneously without much

conversation or discussion and have a

regular interaction with native

obvious searching for expressions.

good familiarity with idiomatic

speakers quite possible. I can take an

I can use language flexibly and

expressions and colloquialisms. I can

active part in discussion in familiar

effectively for social and

express myself fluently and convey

contexts, accounting for and

professional purposes. I can

finer shades of meaning precisely. If I

sustaining my views.

formulate ideas and opinions with

do have a problem I can backtrack

 

precision and relate my

and restructure around the difficulty

 

contribution skilfully to those of

so smoothly that other people are

 

other speakers.

hardly aware of it.

 

 

 

I can present clear, detailed

I can present clear, detailed

I can present a clear, smoothly

descriptions on a wide range of

descriptions of complex subjects

flowing description or argument in a

subjects related to my field of

integrating sub-themes, developing

style appropriate to the context and

interest. I can explain a viewpoint on

particular points and rounding off

with an effective logical structure

a topical issue giving the advantages

with an appropriate conclusion.

which helps the recipient to notice

and disadvantages of various options.

 

and remember significant points.

 

 

 

I can write clear, detailed text on a

I can express myself in clear, well-

I can write clear, smoothly flowing

wide range of subjects related to my

structured text, expressing points

text in an appropriate style. I can

interests. I can write an essay or

of view at some length. I can write

write complex letters, reports or

report, passing on information or

about complex subjects in a

articles which present a case with an

giving reasons in support of or

letter, an essay or a report,

effective logical structure which

against a particular point of view. I

underlining what I consider to be

helps the recipient to notice and

can write letters highlighting the

the salient issues. I can select

remember significant points. I can

personal significance of events and

style appropriate to the reader

write summaries and reviews of

experiences.

in mind.

professional or literary works.

 

 

 

27

Table 3. Common Reference Levels: qualitative aspects of spoken language use

 

RANGE

ACCURACY

FLUENCY

INTERACTION

COHERENCE

 

 

 

 

 

 

C2

Shows great flexibility

Maintains consistent

Can express him/herself

Can interact with ease and

Can create coherent and

 

reformulating ideas in

grammatical control of

spontaneously at length with

skill, picking up and using

cohesive discourse

 

differing linguistic forms

complex language, even

a natural colloquial flow,

non-verbal and intona-

making full and appropri-

 

to convey finer shades of

while attention is otherwise

avoiding or backtracking

tional cues apparently

ate use of a variety of

 

meaning precisely, to give

engaged (e.g. in forward

around any difficulty so

effortlessly. Can interweave

organisational patterns

 

emphasis, to differentiate

planning, in monitoring

smoothly that the

his/her contribution into

and a wide range of

 

and to eliminate ambiguity.

others’ reactions).

interlocutor is hardly

the joint discourse with

connectors and other

 

Also has a good command

 

aware of it.

fully natural turntaking,

cohesive devices.

 

of idiomatic expressions

 

 

referencing, allusion

 

 

and colloquialisms.

 

 

making, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C1

Has a good command of a

Consistently maintains a

Can express him/herself

Can select a suitable phrase

Can produce clear,

 

broad range of language

high degree of grammatical

fluently and spontaneously,

from a readily available

smoothly flowing, well-

 

allowing him/her to select a

accuracy; errors are rare,

almost effortlessly. Only a

range of discourse

structured speech,

 

formulation to express him/

difficult to spot and

conceptually difficult

functions to preface his

showing controlled use of

 

herself clearly in an

generally corrected when

subject can hinder a natural,

remarks in order to get or

organisational patterns,

 

appropriate style on a wide

they do occur.

smooth flow of language.

to keep the floor and to

connectors and cohesive

 

range of general, academic,

 

 

relate his/her own

devices.

 

professional or leisure

 

 

contributions skilfully to

 

 

topics without having to

 

 

those of other speakers.

 

 

restrict what he/she wants

 

 

 

 

 

to say.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B2+

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B2

Has a sufficient range of

Shows a relatively high

Can produce stretches of

Can initiate discourse, take

Can use a limited number

 

language to be able to give

degree of grammatical

language with a fairly even

his/her turn when

of cohesive devices to link

 

clear descriptions, express

control. Does not make

tempo; although he/she can

appropriate and end

his/her utterances into

 

viewpoints on most general

errors which cause mis-

be hesitant as he/she

conversation when he/she

clear, coherent discourse,

 

topics, without much

understanding, and can

searches for patterns and

needs to, though he/she

though there may be

 

conspicuous searching for

correct most of his/her

expressions. There are few

may not always do this

some ‘jumpiness’ in a

 

words, using some complex

mistakes.

noticeably long pauses.

elegantly. Can help the

long contribution.

 

sentence forms to do so.

 

 

discussion along on

 

 

 

 

 

familiar ground confirming

 

 

 

 

 

comprehension, inviting

 

 

 

 

 

others in, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B1+

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B1

Has enough language to get

Uses reasonably accurately a

Can keep going

Can initiate, maintain and

Can link a series of

 

by, with sufficient

repertoire of frequently used

comprehensibly, even though

close simple face-to-face

shorter, discrete simple

 

vocabulary to express him/

‘routines’ and patterns

pausing for grammatical and

conversation on topics that

elements into a

 

herself with some hesitation

associated with more

lexical planning and repair is

are familiar or of personal

connected, linear

 

and circumlocutions on

predictable situations.

very evident, especially in

interest. Can repeat back

sequence of points.

 

topics such as family,

 

longer stretches of free

part of what someone has

 

 

hobbies and interests, work,

 

production.

said to confirm mutual

 

 

travel, and current events.

 

 

understanding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A2+

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A2

Uses basic sentence patterns

Uses some simple structures

Can make him/herself

Can answer questions and

Can link groups of words

 

with memorised phrases,

correctly, but still

understood in very short

respond to simple

with simple connectors

 

groups of a few words and

systematically makes basic

utterances, even though

statements. Can indicate

like ‘and’, ‘but’ and

 

formulae in order to

mistakes.

pauses, false starts and

when he/she is following

‘because’.

 

communicate limited

 

reformulation are very

but is rarely able to

 

 

information in simple

 

evident.

understand enough to keep

 

 

everyday situations.

 

 

conversation going of

 

 

 

 

 

his/her own accord.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A1

Has a very basic repertoire

Shows only limited control

Can manage very short,

Can ask and answer

Can link words or groups

 

of words and simple phrases

of a few simple grammatical

isolated, mainly pre-

questions about personal

of words with very basic

 

related to personal details

structures and sentence

packaged utterances, with

details. Can interact in a

linear connectors like

 

and particular concrete

patterns in a memorised

much pausing to search for

simple way but

‘and’ or ‘then’.

 

situations.

repertoire.

expressions, to articulate less

communication is totally

 

 

 

 

familiar words, and to repair

dependent on repetition,

 

 

 

 

communication.

rephrasing and repair.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment

Communicative language competences

Scaled descriptors are provided for aspects of linguistic competence and pragmatic competence, and for sociolinguistic competence. Certain aspects of competence do not seem to be amenable to definition at all levels; distinctions have been made where they have been shown to be meaningful.

Descriptors need to remain holistic in order to give an overview; detailed lists of microfunctions, grammatical forms and vocabulary are presented in language specifications for particular languages (e.g. Threshold Level 1990). An analysis of the functions, notions, grammar and vocabulary necessary to perform the communicative tasks described on the scales could be part of the process of developing new sets of language specifications. General competences implied by such a module (e.g. Knowledge of the World, Cognitive skills) could be listed in similar fashion.

The descriptors juxtaposed with the text in Chapters 4 and 5:

Draw, in their formulation, upon the experience of many bodies active in the field of defining levels of proficiency.

Have been developed in tandem with the development of the model presented in Chapters 4 and 5 through an interaction between (a) the theoretical work of the authoring group, (b) the analysis of existing scales of proficiency and (c) the practical workshops with teachers. Whilst not providing fully comprehensive coverage of the categories presented in Chapters 4 and 5, the set gives an indication of the possible appearance of a set of descriptors which would do so.

Have been matched to the set of Common Reference Levels: A1 (Breakthrough), A2

(Waystage), B1 (Threshold), B2 (Vantage), C1 (Effective Operational Proficiency) and C2 (Mastery).

Meet the criteria outlined in Appendix A for effective descriptors in that each is brief, is clear and transparent, is positively formulated, describes something definite and has independent, stand-alone integrity – not relying on the formulation of other descriptors for its interpretation.

Have been found transparent, useful and relevant by groups of non-native and nativespeaker teachers from a variety of educational sectors with very different profiles in terms of linguistic training and teaching experience. Teachers appear to understand the descriptors in the set, which has been refined in workshops with them from an initial pool of some thousands of examples.

Are relevant to the description of actual learner achievement in lower and upper secondary, vocational and adult education, and could thus represent realistic objectives.

Have been (with noted exceptions) ‘objectively calibrated’ to a common scale. This means that the position of the vast majority of the descriptors on the scale is the product of the way in which they have been interpreted to assess the achievement of learners, and not just on the basis of the opinion of the authors.

Provide a bank of criterion statements about the continuum of foreign language proficiency which can be exploited flexibly for the development of criterion-referenced assessment. They can be matched to existing local systems, elaborated by local experience and/or used to develop new sets of objectives.

30

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]