Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4070_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана-1
.pdf
171
203. Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft failure / M.
Gaudino, C. Antoniades, U. Benedetto [et al.] // Circulation. – 2017. – Vol. 136, № 18.
– P. 1749–1764 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027597
204. Mid-Term Outcomes and Angiographic Patency of Redo Coronary Artery
Bypass Grafting: A Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery / S.H. Sohn,
S.H. Kim, H.Y. Hwang, K.B. Kim // Journal of chest surgery. – 2021. – Vol. 54, № 2. –
P. 106–116. DOI: 10.5090/jcs.20.122
205. Mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass
graft surgery / J. Ivanov, M.A. Borger, J.V. Tu [et al.] // The Canadian journal of cardi-
ology. – 2008. – Vol. 24, № 4. – P. 279–284. DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70177-6
206. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography in planning of reopera-
tive cardiothoracic surgery / A.R. Kamdar, T.A. Meadows, E.E. Roselli [et al.] // The
Annals of thoracic surgery. – 2008. – Vol. 85, № 4. – P. 1239–1245. DOI:
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.075
207. Myocardial thievery: the coronary-subclavian steal syndrome / T.J. Takach,
G.J. Reul, D.A. Cooley [et al.] // The Annals of thoracic surgery. – 2006. – Vol. 81, №
1. – P. 386–392. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.071
208. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease:
evaluation, classification, and stratification / A.S. Levey, J. Coresh, E. Balk [et al.] //
Annals of internal medicine. – 2003. – Vol. 139, № 2. – P. 137–147. DOI: 10.7326/0003-
4819-139-2-200307150-00013
209. Occurrence and risk factors for reintervention after coronary artery bypass
grafting / J.F. Sabik 3rd, E.H. Blackstone, A.M. Gillinov [et al.] // Circulation. – 2006.
– Vol. 114, 1 Suppl. – P. I454-I460. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001149
210. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: 30 years of debate / M. Gaudino,
G.D. Angelini, C. Antoniades [et al.] // Journal of the American Heart Association. –
2018. – Vol. 7, № 16. – P. e009934. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009934
211. Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial
and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: Results from the
172
Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial / B. Hattler, J.C. Messen-
ger, A.L. Shroyer [et al.] // Circulation. – 2012. – Vol. 125, № 23. – P. 2827–2835. DOI:
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069260
212. Off-pump reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting by thoracotomy: pa-
tient selection and operative technique / F.M. Azoury, A.M. Gillinov, B.W. Lytle [et al.]
// The Annals of thoracic surgery. – 2001. – Vol. 71, № 6. – P. 1959–1963. DOI:
10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02617-0
213. Off-pump strategy in high-risk coronary artery bypass reoperations / D.L.
Ngaage, K.J. Zehr, R.C. Daly [et al.] // Mayo Clinic proceedings. – 2007. – Vol. 82, №
5. – P. 567–571. DOI: 10.4065/82.5.567
214. Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: a propen-
sity score analysis of long-term follow-up / M.I. Rufa, A. Ursulescu, R. Nagib [et al.] //
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. – 2020. – Vol. 159, № 2. – P. 447–
456.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.122
215. Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: a system-
atic review and meta-analysis / P. Zhang, L. Wang, K. Zhai [et al.] // Perfusion. – 2021.
–Vol. 36, № 7. – P. 724–736. DOI: 10.1177/0267659120960310
216. One-year survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction and a saphe-
nous vein graft culprit treated with primary angioplasty / T.T. Nguyen, W.W. O'Neill,
C.L. Grines [et al.] // The American journal of cardiology. – 2003. – Vol. 91, № 10. –
P. 1250–1254. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00277-7
217. Outcomes associated with the use of secondary prevention medications af-
ter coronary artery bypass graft surgery / A. Goyal, J.H. Alexander, G.E. Hafley [et al.]
// AThe Annals of thoracic surgery. – 2007. – Vol. 83, № 3. – P. 993–1001.
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.046
218. Outcomes of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and acute
coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent In-
tervention Triage Strategy) trial / E. Nikolsky, B.T. McLaurin, D.A. Cox [et al.] // Jour-
nal of the American College of Cardiology cardiovascular interventions. – 2012. – Vol.
5, № 9. – P. 919–926. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.009
173
219. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total saphenous
vein graft occlusions in the contemporary era / N. Garg, A. Hakeem, F. Gobal, B.F.
Uretsky // Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. – 2014. – Vol. 83, № 7. –
P. 1025–1032. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25188
220. Outcomes of Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the
United States / A. Elbadawi, M. Hamed, I.Y. Elgendy [et al.] // Journal of the American
Heart Association. – 2020. – Vol. 9, № 15. – P. e016282.
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016282
221. Patterns and outcomes of drug-eluting coronary stent use in clinical practice
/ S.V. Rao, R.E. Shaw, R.G. Brindis [et al.] // American heart journal. – 2006. – Vol.
152, № 2. – P. 321–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.03.005
222. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of left subclavian artery lesions for
the treatment of patients with concomitant vertebral and coronary subclavian steal syn-
drome / F. Filippo, M. Francesco, R. Francesco [et al.] // Cardiovascular and interven-
tional radiology. – 2006. – Vol. 29, № 3. – P.348–353. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-004-0265-
4
223. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts
in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients / E.S. Brilakis, S.V. Rao, S. Banerjee
[et al.] // Journal of the American College of Cardiology cardiovascular interventions. –
2011. – Vol. 4, № 8. – P. 844–850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.018
224. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries versus by-
pass grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: insights from the
veterans affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program / E.S. Brilakis, C.I.
O'Donnell, W. Penny [et al.] // Journal of the American College of Cardiology cardio-
vascular interventions. – 2016. – Vol. 9, № 9. – P. 884–893.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.034
225. Percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery versus venous
bypass graft in patients with prior CABG (PROCTOR). – 2019. https://clinicaltri-
als.gov/ct2/show/NCT03805048 (accessed 28 February 2020).
174
226. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat bypass surgery for pa-
tients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia: awesome randomized trial and
registry experience with post-CABG patients / D.A. Morrison, G. Sethi, J. Sacks [et al.]
// Journal of the American College of Cardiology. – 2002. – Vol. 40, № 11. – P. 1951–
1954. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02560-3
227. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the management of occlusive dis-
ease involving the coronary arteries and saphenous vein bypass grafts: preliminary re-
sults / W.B. Ford, M.H. Wholey, E.A. Zikria [et al.] // The Journal of thoracic and car-
diovascular surgery. – 1980. – Vol. 79, № 1. – P. 1–11. DOI: [нет]
228. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of stenotic coronary artery bypass
grafts: 5 years' experience / G. Cote, R.K. Myler, S.H. Stertzer [et al.] // Journal of the
American College of Cardiology. – 1987. – Vol. 9, № 1. – P. 8–17. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-
1097(87)80075-x
229. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty / R.I. Levy, M.B. Mock,
V.I. Willman, P.L. Frommer // The New England journal of medicine. – 1979. – Vol.
301, № 2. – P. 101–103. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197907123010209
230. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with prior cor-
onary bypass surgery / J.S. Douglas Jr., A.R. Gruentzig, S.B. King 3rd [et al.] // Journal
of the American College of Cardiology. – 1983. – Vol. 2, № 4. – P. 745–754. DOI:
10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80315-5
231. Percutaneous transluminal dilation of aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass
grafts / W.B. Ford, M.H. Wholey, E.A. Zikria [et al.] // Chest. – 1981. – Vol. 79, № 5.
– P. 529–535. DOI: 10.1378/chest.79.5.529
232. Performance of the original EuroSCORE / S. Siregar, R.H. Groenwold, F.
de Heer [et al.] // European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. – 2012. – Vol. 41, № 4.
– P. 746–754. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr285
233. Poor long-term patient and graft survival after primary percutaneous coro-
nary intervention for acute myocardial infarction due to saphenous vein graft occlusion
/ B.R. Brodie, D.S. VerSteeg, M.M. Brodie [et al.] // Catheterization and cardiovascular
interventions. – 2005. – Vol. 65, № 4. – P. 504–509. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20392
175
234. Poulter, R. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and 30-Day Mortality: The
CANADA Score / R. Poulter, J. Hamburge // Coronary Interventions; edit by Dr. Neville
Kukreja. – 2012. – P. 2–46. ISBN: 978-953-51-0498-8
235. Predicting in-hospital mortality after redo cardiac operations: development
of a preoperative scorecard / S. Launcelott, M. Ouzounian, K.J. Buth, J.F. Légaré // The
Annals of thoracic surgery. – 2012. – Vol. 94, № 3. – P. 778–784. DOI: 10.1016/j.atho-
racsur.2012.04.062
236. Prevalence and outcomes of intermediate saphenous vein graft lesions:
findings from the stenting of saphenous vein grafts randomized-controlled trial / A.R.
Abdel-Karim, M. Da Silva, C. Lichtenwalter [et al.] // International journal of cardiol-
ogy. – 2013. – Vol. 168, № 3. – P. 2468–2473. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.006
237. Prevention of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft lesion angi-
oplasty. Experience with a new temporary occlusion and aspiration system / M. Carlino,
J. De Gregorio, C. Di Mario [et al.] // Circulation. – 1999. – Vol. 99, № 25. – P. 3221–
3223. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.25.3221
238. Prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery and outcome after percutaneous
coronary intervention: an observational study from the Pan-London Percutaneous Cor-
onary Intervention Registry / K.S. Rathod, A.M. Beirne, R. Bogle [et al.] // Journal of
the American Heart Association. – 2020. – Vol. 9, № 12. – P. e014409.
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014409
239. Prognostic factors for atherosclerosis progression in saphenous vein grafts:
the postcoronary artery bypass graft (Post-CABG) trial. Post-CABG Trial Investigators
/ M.J. Domanski, C.B. Borkowf, L. Campeau [et al.] // Journal of the American College
of Cardiology. – 2000. – Vol. 36, № 3. – P. 1877–1883. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-
1097(00)00973-6
240. Progression of atherosclerosis in coronary arteries and bypass grafts: ten
years later / M.G. Bourassa, M. Enjalbert, L. Campeau, J. Lesperance // The American
journal of cardiology. – 1984. – Vol. 53, № 12. – P. 102C–107C. DOI: 10.1016/0002-
9149(84)90759-8
176
241. Propensity score analysis of early and late outcome after redo off-pump and
on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting / H.A. Vohra, T. Bahrami, S. Farid [et al.] //
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. – 2008. – Vol. 33, № 2. – P. 209–214. DOI:
10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.11.011
242. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary
artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study) / S. Deb, E.A.
Cohen, S.K. Singh [et al.] // Journal of the American College of Cardiology. – 2012. –
Vol. 60, № 1. – P. 28–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.037
243. Radial artery graft stenosis treated by percutaneous intervention / P. Goube,
N. Hammoudi, J.Y. Pagny [et al.] // European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. – 2010.
– Vol. 37, № 3. – P. 697–703. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.06.058
244. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery /
M. Gaudino, U. Benedetto, S. Fremes [et al.] // The New England journal of medicine.
– 2018. – Vol. 378, № 22. – P. 2069–2077. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
245. Raja, S.G. Reoperative off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: current
outcomes, concerns and controversies / S.G. Raja, M. Amrani // Expert review of cardi-
ovascular therapy. – 2010. – Vol. 8, № 5. – P. 685–694. DOI: 10.1586/erc.10.14
246. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coro-
nary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary
Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial / A. Kapur, R.J. Hall, I.S. Malik [et al.] //
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. – 2010. – Vol. 55, № 5. – P. 432–440.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.014
247. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous
intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts / D.S. Baim, D. Wahr,
B. George [et al.] // Circulation. – 2002. – Vol. 105, № 11. – P. 1285–1290. DOI: [нет]
248. Real life stenting: a comparison of target vessel revascularization in Ben-
estent-STRESS lesions to non Benestent-STRESS lesions / F.V. Tilli, D. Aliabadi,
J.W. Kinn [et al.] // Circulation. – 1996. – Vol. 94, Suppl III. – P. 332. DOI: [нет]
249. Recommendations of the European Association of Echocardiography: how
to use echo-Doppler in clinical trials: different modalities for different purposes /
177
M. Galderisi, M.Y. Henein, J. D'hooge [et al.] // European journal of echocardiography.
– 2011. – Vol. 12, № 5. – P. 339–353. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer051
250. Recycling of internal thoracic arteries in reoperative coronary surgery: in-
hospital and midterm results / E.I. Oumeiri B., D. Glineur, J. Price [et al.] // The Annals
of thoracic surgery. – 2011. – Vol. 91, № 4. – P. 1165–1168 DOI: 10.1016/j.atho-
racsur.2010.11.073
251. Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI / T.E.
Kusu-Orkar, K. Masharani, A. Harky, A.D. Muir // Brazilian journal of cardiovascular
surgery. 2022. – Vol. 37, № 4. – P. 546–553. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0206
252. Redo coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart and transfusion
needs / C. Gerli, L. Mantovani, A. Franco [et al.] // Minerva anestesiologica. – 2006. –
Vol. 72, # 12. – P. 985–993.
253. Redo minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting / S. Jacobs,
D. Holzhey, T. Walther [et al.] // The Annals of thoracic surgery. – 2005. – Vol. 80, №
4. – P. 1336–1339. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.142
254. Reimplantation of a left internal thoracic artery during repeat coronary ar-
tery revascularization: early and midterm results / M. Pasic, P. Müller, P. Bergs [et al.]
// The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. – 2005. – Vol. 129, № 5. – P.
1180–1182. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.023
255. Relationship between vein graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes
after coronary artery bypass surgery / R.D. Lopes, R.H. Mehta, G.E. Hafley [et al.] //
Circulation. – 2012. – Vol. 125, № 6. – P. 749–756. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULA-
TIONAHA.111.040311
256. Reoperation for myocardial revascularization / F.D. Loop, R.L. Thurer,
B.W. Lytle, D.M. Cosgrove // World journal of surgery. – 1978. – Vol. 2, № 6. – P. 719–
727. DOI: 10.1007/BF01556515
257. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late out-
comes / M. Di Mauro, A.L. Iacò, M. Contini [et al.] // The Annals of thoracic surgery.
– 2005. – Vol. 79, № 1. – P. 81–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.058
178
258. Reoperative coronary bypass surgery: effect of patent grafts and retrograde
cardioplegia / M.A. Borger, V. Rao, R.D. Weisel [et al.] // The Journal of thoracic and
cardiovascular surgery. – 2001. – Vol. 121, № 1. – P. 83–90
DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.111382
259. Reoperative myocardial revascularization / F.D. Loop, M.J. Irarrazaval,
D.M. Cosgrove [et al.] // Cleveland Clinic quarterly. – 1978. – Vol. 45, № 1. – P. 139–
140. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.45.1.139
260. Repeat Coronary Bypass Surgery or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
After Previous Surgical Revascularization / C. Locker, L.E. Greiten, M.R. Bell [et al.]
// Mayo Clinic proceedings. – 2019. – Vol. 94, № 9. – P. 1743–1752. DOI:
10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.048
261. Repeat coronary revascularization after coronary artery bypass surgery in
older adults: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' national experience, 1991-2007 / E.L.
Fosbøl, Y. Zhao, D.M. Shahian [et al.] // Circulation. – 2013. – Vol. 127, № 16. – P.
1656–1663. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001882
262. Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality / J.M. Jones,
H. O'kane, D.J. Gladstone [et al.] // The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
– 2001. – Vol. 122, № 5. – P. 913–918. DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.116470
263. Repeat surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of the left thor-
acotomy approach / D.G. Harris, A.R. Coetzee, J.T. Augustyn, A. Saaiman // The heart
surgery forum. – 2009. – Vol. 12, № 3. – P. E163–E167. DOI:
10.1532/HSF98.20091046
264. Return to work after coronary artery bypass in patients aged under 50 years
/ N. Pinto, P. Shah, B. Haluska [et al.] // Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals. – 2012.
– Vol. 20, № 4. – P. 387–391. DOI: 10.1177/0218492312437881
265. Risk Factors and Outcomes in Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting / M.
Gallo, J.R. Trivedi, G. Monreal [et al.] // Heart, lung & circulation. – 2020. – Vol. 29,
№ 3. – P. 384–389. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.02.008
266. Robotic totally endoscopic double-vessel bypass grafting: a further step to-
ward closed-chest surgical treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease / J. Bonatti,
179
T. Schachner, N. Bonaros [et al.] // The heart surgery forum. – 2007. – Vol. 10, № 3. –
P. E239–E242. DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20070702
267. Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery by-
pass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization results from a fully integrated hybrid
catheterization laboratory/operating room / D.X. Zhao, M. Leacche, J.M. Balaguer [et
al.] // Journal of the American College of Cardiology. – 2009. – Vol. 53, № 3. – P. 232–
241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.011
268. Ruel, M. Suboptimal medical therapy after coronary revascularization: a
missed opportunity / Ruel M, Kulik A. // Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
– 2018. – Vol. 71, № 6. – P. 603–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.007
269. Sajja, L.R. A narrative review of redo coronary artery bypass grafting / L.R.
Sajja // AME Medical Journal. – 2021. – Vol. 6. – P. 20. DOI: 10.21037/amj-20-50
270. Sajja, L.R. The journey of surgery for coronary artery disease in India:
adoption, customization and innovation / L.R. Sajja // Indian Journal of Thoracic and
Cardiovascular Surgery. – 2014. – Vol. 30. – P. 116–128.
271. Sampling time error in EuroSCORE II / M. Poullis, B. Fabri, M. Pullan [et
al.] // Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. – 2012. – Vol. 14, № 5. – P. 640–
641. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs034
272. Saphenous vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to prevention and treat-
ment strategies / I. Xenogiannis, M. Zenati, D.L. Bhatt [et al.] // Circulation. – 2021. –
Vol. 144, № 9. – P. 728–745. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052163
273. Saphenous vein graft stenting and major adverse cardiac events: a predic-
tive model derived from a pooled analysis of 3958 patients / A. Coolong, D.S. Baim,
R.E. Kuntz [et al.] // Circulation. – 2008. – Vol. 117, № 6. – P. 790–797.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.651232
274. Saphenous vein grafts with multiple versus single distal targets in patients
undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year graft failure and five-year out-
comes from the Project of Ex-Vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection (PRE-
VENT) IV trial / R.H. Mehta, T.B. Ferguson, R.D. Lopes [et al.] // Circulation. – 2011.
– Vol. 124, № 3. – P. 280–288. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.991299
180
275. Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a
network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / U. Benedetto, S.G. Raja, A. Al-
banese [et al.] // European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. – 2015. – Vol. 47, № 1. –
P. 59–65. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu111
276. Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a scien-
tific statement from the American Heart Association / A. Kulik, M. Ruel, H. Jneid [et
al.] // Circulation. – 2015. – Vol.131, № 10. – P. 927–964.
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000182
277. Secondary prevention medications after coronary artery bypass grafting
and long-term survival: a population-based longitudinal study from the SWEDEHEART
registry / E. Björklund, S.J. Nielsen, E.C. Hansson [et al.] // European heart journal. –
2020. – Vol. 41, № 17. – P. 1653–1661 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz714
278. Secondary surgical procedure for myocardial revascularization / W.D.
Johnson, J.F. Hoffman Jr., R.J. Flemma, A.J. Tector // The Journal of thoracic and car-
diovascular surgery. – 1972. – Vol. 64, № 4. – P. 523–529.
279. Seldinger, S.I. Catheter Replacement of the Needle in Percutaneous Arteri-
ography: A new technique / S.I. Seldinger // Acta Radiologica. – 1953. – Vol. 39, № 5.
– P. 368–376. DOI: 10.3109/00016925309136722
280. Serruys, P.W. Coronary-artery stents / P.W. Serruys, M.J. Kutryk, A.T.
Ong // The New England journal of medicine. – 2006. – Vol. 354, № 5. – P. 483–495.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra051091
281. Simple bedside additive tool for prediction of in-hospital mortality after
percutaneous coronary interventions / M. Moscucci, E. Kline-Rogers, D. Share, [et al.]
// Circulation. – 2001. – Vol. 104, № 3. – 263–268. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.263
282. Stiles, Q.R. Reoperation for myocardial revascularization / Q.R. Stiles //
Cleveland Clinic quarterly. – 1978. – Vol. 45, № 1. – P. 136–138.
DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.45.1.136
283. Subramanian, V.A. Clinical experience with minimally invasive reopera-
tive coronary bypass surgery / V.A. Subramanian // European journal of cardio-thoracic
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана