Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Цифровизация общества и будущее христианства к вопросу о трансформации ценностно-нормативной системы общества. Материалы VII Между народной научной ко

.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
07.09.2026
Размер:
1 Мб
Скачать
☆
Алекс Хон-Хо. Методологический обзор цифровой теологии и исследование...
may aff ect the concept bible. With the introduction of social media, he found that although there is no change in the context of the text, there are many paratextual social media such as blogs, Facebook pages and YouTube Channel which provide information and programmes based on the bible. These range from formal interpretation of the bible to pastoral preaching of biblical texts to therapeutic sharing of biblical verses with images attached to them. He also found that these paratextual social media have an enor­mous impact on Christians as far as the number viewed, shared and sub­scribed are concerned. This surely supports our research on the one hand and points to a new direction on the other. Social media have grown from a way to read the bible and to search for information about it to be provid­ers of content themselves. This shows that social media not only aff ect our habits but they exert infl uence on our understanding of the bible. Also, with a more virtual church, worship, preaching and other online teach­ing, our Christian practice is inevitably aff ected. The only questions are: to what extent, how and in what sense? This paper aims at contributing to the development of digital theology in ways of investigating to what extent does the social media using pattern may aff ect Christians’ biblical inter­pretation.
Big Data, Social Media and Biblical Interpretation
The reason for hypothesising that there is a relationship between social media and biblical interpretation in the era of Big Data is because our ev­ery action on social matter, whether we notice or not, is stored, analysed and used. Our actions will be stored and analysed as data in social media companies like Facebook. These data are very valuable for social media companies, businesses, and politicians as they reveal accurate and impor­tant information about the habits, interests, items of the greatest interest and objects of love and hate for a huge population. Social media companies make use of this information to help businesses target the right market. Politicians can make use of the information concerning people’s hidden likes and dislikes on certain issues to manipulate public opinions or even election results [11, p. 3]. The social media platform providers are also mo­tivated to use various strategies to ensure users remain as long as possible on the platform — so-called engagement — as the longer you stay on their me- dia, the more information they can get from your actions. Accordingly, this
31
Христианство и глобальные сети
research paper asks the following question: Will this cycle of information collection, analysis and fi ltering aff ect Christians’ biblical interpretations? Will it polarise Christians’ views on some controversial biblical verses?
Big Data information mining
One of the most revolutionary breakthroughs in association with Big Data is that it is possible to generate large amounts of information about a person or a large group of people from data that was previously considered useless. Some of these vast amounts of information generated by Big Data are highly accurate. For example, Google Flu Trends, employing Big Data since 2004, have provided very accurate forecasts of infl uenza numbers [2, p. 782]. How are such accurate predictions possible? This comes from a combination of diff erent improvements in technology making the data mining process available to companies. First and foremost, among these is surely the signifi cant decrease in the cost of storing large amounts of data. The cost of storing data has decreased by 30% to 40% each year over the past few years, facilitating the high volume, velocity and variety of data to be stored [2, p. 474]. This is signifi cant because the more data that can be collected and analysed, the more accurate the predictions can be made. The reduction in the cost of storing data subsequently has created the basic environment for the era of Big Data. As a result, more and broader varieties of data can be stored for analysis.
The second technology improvement is Big Data analytics. New tech­nologies such as the NOSQL database, Hadoop and MapReduce have emerged to help analyse the huge amounts of data [10, p. 4]. It is not only the huge amounts of data that have generated the paradigm shift that we have described but also the broadness of the data that can be collected and analysed. However, much of the collected data, such as our private mes­sages, photos and reactions on social media, are still controversial from the perspective of ethics, even as they have been analysed by numerous elec­tronic platforms for generating commercially valuable data. The outcome is explosive and can bring a new paradigm in commercial activities as well as our daily lives. The McKinsey Global Institute describes Big Data as a new factor of production, which implies it is as important as other traditional resources like land and capital [10, p. 4]. The value of Big Data also refl ects its ground-breaking importance to business. Facebook earned 18 billion
32
Алекс Хон-Хо. Методологический обзор цифровой теологии и исследование...
dollars net income in 2019 while Toyota, the world’s largest motor vehicle producer, earned 22 billion dollars net income in the same year
1
. How can a social media platform earn nearly as much as the world’s largest motor vehicle company? What does Facebook produce? What makes its services so valuable? It provides a platform for users free of charge but collects their information and in return provides accurate information for businesses to use selling their products. This accurate information is highly valuable and gives a range of actors and enterprises the ability to aff ect our daily lives by using it to manipulate our motivations and behaviour. The next section will address how social media, especially Facebook, contribute to the era of Big Data.
New Sources of Data: Social Media
The rise of social media has contributed signifi cantly to the era of Big Data, as it provides a new and specifi c source of data. Social media re­fers to electronic platforms where people connect with their friends and relatives mainly for social functions. By using social media, people reveal their preferences, values and priorities, which cannot be found formally or without a very high cost on other channels. On social media, users usually type a short message and make short comments or post photos, which, without the new technology, would be meaningless to anyone other than the user. With new technology like natural language processing (NLP), however, all these short texts, social actions or reactions on social media can be transformed into usable data [3, pp. 63–64]. New technology on sentiment analysis also helps to detect users’ sentiments from their actions on social media [3, pp. 72–73]. The blossoming of social media is also the blossoming of new and huge sources of data for data users. The question is not only what can become data, but also how will the social media plat­forms use those data? Due to the limitations of this paper, we will focus on the world’s largest social media platform, Facebook, as an example. The reason for choosing Facebook as the example for study is obvious, since
1
‘Toyota Net Income 2006–2019,’ Macrotrends, accessed 26 March, 2020, https:// www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/TM/toyota/net-income; ‘Facebook Net Income 2009 to 2019,’ Macrotrends, accessed 26 March, 2020, https://www.macrotrends.net/ stocks/charts/FB/facebook/net-income
33
Христианство и глобальные сети
it is the largest and one of the earliest successful social media platforms. Facebook is not merely a social medium, as many users may think. It is the world’s largest social media company with 2.5 billion active users in the fourth quarter of 2019.
1
Every minute, more than 500,000 comments are posted, 293,000 statuses updated and 136,000 photos uploaded on Face­book [9, p. 118]. How it conducts business and makes uses of the data it collects will have a signifi cant impact on its users, therefore establishing its worth for using as an example in our study.
Facebook is not merely a platform that neutrally allows users to inter­act with their friends but, similar to other platforms in the era of Big Data, it stimulates our participation to reveal our preferences, collects all the in­formation that is thereby exposed, analyses it and uses it, not coinciden­tally, in ways that are profi table to the company and its clients. The focus of the following section is twofold. The fi rst part will focus on Facebook as a social media source of information in the era of Big Data. What informa­tion is it able to gather? How does it gather information and how does it use this information? The second part will be a higher-order question that investigates how Facebook provides information to the platform’s custom­ers. Is it really free and open or does it contain inherent biases?
Not only does Facebook note and record every action we make on the venue but also entices us to reveal more and stay longer. The reason is that the more frequently we visit and the longer we stay on Facebook, the more information will be revealed to the company’s algorithms [11, p. 10]. The design of Facebook is therefore not neutral but focuses on whatever is likely to attract your attention and stir you emotions. Facebook’s programmers are experts in this. The company provides the best platform for people to update their own status to earn “likes.” Both the status you post and the re­action you post on others’ status become important information for Face­book. This attracts users to post as many stories about their private lives as possible, since the more personal and current information you provide, the more likely you are to buy products suggested by social media [4, p. 7]. These items of information can be diffi cult to collect by other means but is made easy through your status, regardless of the reason you provide it. For example, every time you post a photo tagging friends, it generates in-
1
‘Number of Monthly Active Facebook Users Worldwide as of 4th quarter 2019,’ Statista, accessed 24 March, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/ number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide
34
Алекс Хон-Хо. Методологический обзор цифровой теологии и исследование...
formation on your favourite places to go, styles of food, and entertainment. The platform also allows you to react to others’ posts so that they can learn your preferences through your actions. As explained in the previous sec­tion, NLP technology also allows social media providers to read the mes­sages you post on your status. Facebook also cooperates with other online platforms and companies to allow them to use your Facebook account to lock in their page. This move allows Facebook access to information about the products or pages you visit beyond Facebook.
As a company, Facebook not only runs its own venue but also owns other major means of social media, including WhatsApp, Instagram and others. All your information on these media will also be collected in your personalised account on Facebook. Moreover, through the new partner­ship service provided by Facebook to other companies called Open Graph, users of Facebook can use their Facebook account to log in to other elec­tronic platforms, such as Spotify. From this kind of partnership and the use of tracking cookies, a technology for reading personal data concerning your actions on the Internet, Facebook is able to further extend its infor­mation sources by this kind of new technology [11, p. 58].
Without the rise of social media, all this information would probably not be available for the business world. To encourage you to stay longer on Facebook, the platform also uses a technology called a ‘fi lter bubble’. The social media analyist Eli Pariser coined this term to refer to social me­dia or search engines, such as Facebook and Google, respectively. Each company uses engines that run algorithms to provide users’ information or posts that you may like the most and reduce those that you may not like or are not among your preferences according to all the data they have gath­ered about you. This way of feeding information to users keeps us using the social media for extended sessions but limits our view and opportunities to hear voices other than our own [11, p. 9]. Pariser is right in saying that the personalisation fi lter in social media and search engines is a kind of ‘invis­ible autopropaganda, indoctrinating us with our own ideas, amplifying our desire for things that are familiar...’ [11, p. 15]. Driven by business motives, Facebook gathers users’ information and feeds them with the posts or views that are closer to the users’ own view. In this way, Facebook is never a neu­tral platform but exerts an infl uence over our views and lives from various perspectives, including the political and religious.
In short, in the era of Big Data, social media, like Facebook, do not act solely as service providers but as information and context providers and,
35
Христианство и глобальные сети
most importantly, advertisers. Even though these companies promise not to sell our information directly, they help businesses advertise to the right customers based on their calculated data. They also maximise the potential customers’ possible contact time by various strategies, including fi ltering posts that suit our preferences and posts that attract more reactions, which are more likely to be those with short messages and relatively extreme views, because the longer we stay, the more data we will provide to them and the more room they have to advertise various products to us. How Facebook collects and uses our data is highly controversial and generates questions about politics and ethics. However, this paper focuses on how Facebook’s commercial strategy of data collection and uses may exert an impact on Christians’ interpretation of the Bible. I do not assume that Facebook or other external users may intentionally use Facebook to manipulate our un­derstanding of some controversial verses of the Bible, but it is possible. The survey, based on the commercial strategy of collecting and using data and the possible eff ect this has on every user, seeks to determine if there is any impact on Christians’ interpretation of the Bible.
Hypothesis and method of the survey
In order to look deeper into the possible relationship between social media and biblical interpretation, we conducted a survey in Hong Kong during October 2019. The hypothesis in this survey is that given the view and technology of the era of Big Data explained in the above sections, so­cial media are not merely neutral platforms but operators of profi t-making data management strategies that could aff ect our views, including biblical interpretation. This survey does not discuss whether one interpretation or another is right but focuses on fi nding the patterns of Hong Kong Christians when using social media and the possible relationships with their interpre­tation of the Bible. Based on 780 collected questionnaires, the following section will fi rst present the results of the survey and correlations concern­ing Hong Kong Christians’ social media use patterns, their political views, political participation patterns and interpretation of political-related bibli­cal verses, mainly using Facebook as the target. After the presentation of data and correlations, I will provide an analysis based on the characteristics of Big Data. Finally, I will share the theological and social implications of the results.
36
Алекс Хон-Хо. Методологический обзор цифровой теологии и исследование...
Although this paper is not exegetical, we take the biblical interpreta­tion framework known as socio-rhetorical interpretation (SRI) as our basic assumption on the major factors aff ecting Christians’ interpretation of the Bible. SRI, which emphasises the communicative purpose of a text, sug­gests that the meaning or understanding of a text contains four essential layers but without being limited to these four. The four layers include the inner texture, inter-texture, socio-cultural texture and ideological texture [1, pp. 20–21]. We have no room to give a full elaboration of SRI but will briefl y explain what the four textures are and in what way the use of social media will be relevant in light of SRI. The inner texture refers to all the lit­erary characteristics we can identify by looking into the text itself. It could be the use of repeated words or groups of words and the use of a special sentence structure and so on. The inter-texture refers to the use of words, borrowing or echoing their meaning, which have appeared in other texts. Socio-cultural texture refers to the social and cultural contexts, which may aff ect the writers’ and readers’ understanding of the meaning of the text. Ideological texture refers to the underlying presupposition, bias and values of writers and readers
1
. We will borrow the framework of these four tex­tures in our analysis. Based on this framework of understanding a text, we hypothesise that Christians’ interpretation of the Bible may be aff ected by their use of social media since doing so will aff ect their perception of the social and culture situation as well as their ideology. Both the intensity of social media use and the information users receive through social media will aff ect the socio-cultural texture and ideological texture from the read­ers’ perspective. The impact of the use of social media will also be posi­tively related to the time spent on social media. Therefore, in the survey, our concern includes the time spent, types of social media and signifi cant activities on Facebook, with the aim of determining if there is any correla­tion between these characteristics and biblical interpretations we can draw from our data.
The survey, in Chinese, was conducted from 15/10/2019 to 23/10/2019. Questionnaires in the form of Google Forms were distributed through pas­tors and church members of diff erent denominations through electronic media, including email, Facebook posts and WhatsApp. Among the sur­veyed Christians, 40% are male and 60% are female. The age distribution
1
‘Ideology Textures,’ Dictionary of So cio-rhetorical Terms, accessed 1 April, 2020,
http://www.religion.emory.edu/faculty/robbins/SRI/defns/i_defns.cfm#ideological
37
Христианство и глобальные сети
is also spread quite evenly from 15–24 at 11,4%, 25–34 at 24%, 35–44 at 27%, 45–54 at 23% and 55–64 at 12%. The education level is quite high, with 50% having a graduate degree and 24% a master’s degree or above, while 25% have only a secondary or other non-degree tertiary education.
Description of data
Three sets of data were collected in this survey. The fi rst set focuses on Christians’ general habits or patterns of using social media, including their general habits when using diff erent kinds of social media and, specifi cally, time spent, favourite type and preferred activities on Facebook. In addition to investigating electronic means of social media, traditional forms of mass media are also investigated to compare their impacts on those who do not often access social media. The second set of data focuses on Christians’ political views and participation. We investigate Christians’ general views on government and specifi c views on the recent anti-extradition bill issue. Besides their opinions and stances, we also look into their level of political participation, ranging from participating in petitions and demonstrations to making donations. Through this, we hope we can understand the in­tensity of their beliefs beyond their views. The third set of data focuses on Christians’ interpretation of some controversial verses of the Bible. These verses are chosen because, fi rst, they are relatively more well known, which reduces the impact of people referring to them in a misinformed man­ner. These verses are also often quoted by diff erent camps of believers or discussed defending one group’s views or attacking the views of opposing camps. Sometimes, they are quoted by two opposing camps according to completely diff erent understandings and defi nitions.
The social media use patterns of Hong Kong Christians
The aim of this section is to identify the basic pattern of Hong Kong Christians in using social media, including their intensity, type of social media used more often and the most frequent activities done on Facebook. These patterns indicate the likelihood that social media aff ects their in­terpretation of the social and cultural situation and ideology based on our hypothesis concerning the data usage of social media companies in the era of Big Data.
38
Алекс Хон-Хо. Методологический обзор цифровой теологии и исследование...
Hours spent on the Internet: The most frequent option is 3–4 hours
per day for personal use, chosen by 333 out of 780 respondents (42.7%). The second option is 1–2 hours per day, the choice of 262 out of 780 peo­ple (33.6%). The third option is 5–6 hours per day. There are 100 out of 780 respondents (12.8%) who spend less than an hour on the Internet. The fi rst three options accounts for the 88% of the total respondents. The rest responded to use more than 7 hours or above. Therefore, the weighted average hours spent on the Internet are 3.7 hours per day for personal use, which is consistent with another survey conducted by Global Web Index that Hong Kong people spend 3 hours 22 minutes, which is 3.67 hours per
1
day
. This is a ranking of 27th among 40 countries or regions surveyed and
is slightly lower than the world average of 3 hours 28 minutes
2
. The most popular means of accessing the Internet is through mobile phones, which was the choice of 616 out of 780 respondents (79%). The second is desktop computers, at 104 out of 780 (13.3%). The third is laptop computers, at 52 out of 780 (6.6%). This shows that the infl uence of mobile phones is the most signifi cant, and the more popular mobile has the higher impact of social media on personal life.
The most frequently used social media is WhatsApp, by 520 out of 780 participants (66.7%), and the second is Facebook, by 193 out of 780 (24.7%). These two shared more than 90% of the researched population. Since many people use more than one social media, the survey also asked them what is their second most often used social media. In this category, Facebook is the most frequently used, by 408 out of 780 (52.3%). What­sApp is the second in this category, by 209 out of 780 (26.8%). Instagram is the third most popular, with 104 out of 780 (13.3%). This shows that Facebook and WhatsApp are still the most popular social media used by the researched population. The importance of Instagram is increasing as well. As explained in the Big Data section, Facebook owns WhatsApp, and they can personalise your account and get access to your informa­tion in both forms of social media. The result is that they can predict your preference more accurately. Concerning the time spent using social me­dia, the most frequent choice is 1–2 hours, for 345 out of 780 participants (44%), 225 chose 3–4 hours (29%) and 97 chose less than 1 hour (12%).
1
‘How much time does YOUR country spend online?’ Mail Online, accessed 1 April, 2020, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6658237/How-time­does-country-spend-online.html
2
Ibid.
39
Христианство и глобальные сети
The average time spent on social media therefore is 3 hours 23 minutes, which is higher than the world average of 2 hours 22 minutes, according to a research
1
. The reason may be due to the high penetration rate of using mobile phones in Hong Kong. In 2019, Hong Kong’s smartphone penetra­tion rate was 77%, which is higher than China’s rate of 60%, which is the highest penetration rate ranking by country
2
. It is also consistent with our survey that 79% of 780 people responded that they use smartphones most often as the online device.
In light of the habit of using Facebook, the survey asked what is the most frequent action the respondents do on Facebook and asked them to rank the top fi ve of their activities. The question gives 12 choices, including real­time communication, update status, reading friends’ status, reading news, reading entertainment information, sharing friends’ status, sharing news, sharing entertainment news, following pages, reading groups, shopping and others. The top three choices of their fi rst choice are reading news (380 out of 780), reading friends’ status (221 out of 780) and live communication (48 out of 780). The top three choices of their second choice are reading news (214 out of 780), reading friends’ status (176 out of 780) and sharing news (138 out of 780). The top three choices of their third choice are read­ing friends’ news (125 out of 780), reading entertainment news (123 out of
780) and following pages (101 out of 780). The top three choices of their fourth choice, starting to spread more even among the 12 choices, follow­ing pages (113 out of 780), sharing friends’ status (96 out of 780) and read­ing entertainment news (91 out of 780). The top three choices of their fi fth choice, spreading even more even among the 12 choices, update status (99 out of 780), real-time communication (90 out of 780), and sharing friends’ status (74 out of 780).
In short, the habit of using social media among Hong Kong Christians is very intensive in terms of the time they spend on social media. Such intensity supports the hypothesis that the use of social media could be a
1
‘Daily time spent on social networking by internet users worldwide from 2012 to 2019’ Statista, accessed 21 April, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/ daily-social-media-usage-worldwide
2
‘Top Countries by Smartphone Users’ NewZoo, accessed 2 April, 2020, https:// newzoo.com/insights/rankings/top-countries-by-smartphone-penetration-and­users; ‘Smartphone Penetration as Share of the Population in Hong Kong from 2015 to 2023’, Statista, accessed 2 April, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/625415/ smartphone-user-penetration-in-hong-kong
40
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]