Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5219_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •About the Editors
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Conventional Methods
- •1.2.1 Microscopy
- •1.2.2 Culture
- •1.2.3 Germ Tube Test
- •1.2.5 Carbohydrate Assimilation Test
- •1.2.6 Nitrogen Assimilation Test
- •1.2.7 Carbohydrate Fermentation Test
- •1.2.8 Urease Test
- •1.2.9 Tween 80 Opacity Test
- •1.3 Nonculture-Based Conventional Methods
- •1.3.1 Serological Methods
- •1.3.1.2 ß-d-Glucan
- •1.3.1.3 C. albicans Germ Tube Antibody Assay (CAGTA)
- •1.4 Nucleic Acid-Based Detection
- •1.4.1 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
- •1.4.3 Peptide Nucleic Acid FISH (PNA-FISH)
- •1.4.4 PCR-Based Innovative Diagnosis
- •1.4.5 FilmArray System
- •1.4.6 Sepsis Flow Chip
- •1.4.7 ePlex System
- •1.4.8 The T2 Candida Assay
- •1.5 Rapid Identification Systems
- •1.5.1 Manual Rapid Identification System
- •1.5.1.1 The API System
- •1.5.1.2 The VITEK System
- •1.5.2 Automatic Rapid Identification System
- •1.5.2.1 MALDI-TOF MS
- •1.5.2.2 The MALDI Sepsityper IVD Kit
- •1.5.2.3 The BioFire FilmArray BCID2 Panel
- •1.5.2.4 The Accelerate Pheno BC Panel
- •1.6 Advanced Diagnostics
- •1.6.2 Biosensor-Based Tests
- •1.6.3 Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
- •1.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1.2 Echinocandins
- •First-Generation Echinocandin
- •Second-Generation Echinocandin
- •2.2.1.3 Other Cell Wall Inhibitors
- •2.2.2.1 Azoles
- •Imidazole
- •Triazole
- •Second-Generation Azole
- •Third-Generation Azole
- •2.2.2.2 Polyenes
- •Other Polyene Under Development
- •2.2.2.3 Allylamines
- •2.2.3 Flucytosine
- •2.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2.1 Control Diet
- •3.2.3 Toxification
- •3.2.4 Alternative Treatments
- •3.3.1 Prophylaxis
- •3.3.2 Preemptive Therapies
- •3.3.3 Empirical Therapies
- •3.4 Therapeutic Approach
- •3.4.1 Azoles
- •3.4.2 Echinocandins
- •3.4.3 Polyenes
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3 Eukarya Domain
- •4.4.1 Cryptococcus
- •4.4.2 Aspergillus
- •4.4.3 Mucorales
- •4.4.4 Candida
- •4.5.1 Candida albicans
- •4.5.2 Morphogenesis
- •4.5.3 Pathogenesis
- •4.5.4 Adherence
- •4.5.5 Morphological Switching
- •4.5.6 Invasion
- •4.6 Induced Endocytosis
- •4.7 Active Penetration
- •4.8.2 Biofilm Formation
- •4.8.4.1 Antifungals
- •4.8.4.2 Antifungal Resistance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.3.1 Serum
- •5.2.3.2 Low Nitrogen
- •5.2.3.5 Carbon Source
- •5.2.3.6 pH
- •5.2.3.7 N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)
- •5.2.3.8 Quorum Sensing Molecule
- •5.5.5 Surface Colonization Factor1 (SCF1)
- •5.5.6 Other Putative Adhesins
- •5.6.1 Phospholipases
- •5.6.2 Proteinases
- •5.6.3 Hemolysins
- •5.6.4 Lipases
- •5.7 Secreted Cytolytic Peptide: Candidalysin
- •5.5.1 ALS Family
- •5.5.2 HWP Adhesin
- •5.5.3 HYR/IFF Family
- •5.5.4 EPA Family
- •5.9.2 Low Molecular Weight Hsp/Small Heat Shock Proteins
- •5.10.1 Amino Acid/Nitrogen Metabolism
- •5.10.1.1 Amino Acid Sensing Pathway
- •5.12.1.1 Glycolysis
- •5.12.1.2 Gluconeogenesis
- •5.12.1.3 Glyoxylate Cycle
- •5.12.1.4 Fatty Acid Oxidation
- •5.12.3.2 Iron Metabolism
- •5.12.3.3 Candida Iron Transport
- •5.12.3.4 Reductive System
- •5.12.3.5 Siderophore Uptake System
- •5.12.3.6 Haemoglobin-Iron Uptake System
- •5.13.2 Zinc Metabolism
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Morphological Switching
- •6.3 Phenotypic Switching
- •6.4 Biofilm Formation
- •6.5 Metabolic Flexibility
- •6.8.1 Hemolysin
- •6.8.2 Phospholipases
- •6.8.3 Proteinase
- •6.8.4 Candidalysin
- •6.12 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2.4 Polymorphism
- •7.2.5.1 Secreted Aspartyl Proteinases
- •7.2.5.2 Phospholipase
- •7.2.6 Calcineurin-Signalling Pathway
- •7.2.7 Ion Homeostasis
- •7.2.7.1 Iron
- •7.2.7.2 Copper
- •7.2.8.1 Capsule
- •7.2.8.2 Melanin
- •7.2.8.3 Heat Shock Proteins
- •7.3 Conclusions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.4.1 ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters
- •8.4.2 Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) Transporter
- •8.5.1 Biofilm Architecture Among Candida Species
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.3 Biofilm
- •10.5 Adherence
- •10.6 Maturation
- •10.8 Dispersion
- •10.11 Animal Models
- •10.18 Photodynamic Therapy
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.9 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Epidemiology
- •12.3.1 Humoral Response
- •12.3.2 Cellular Immunity
- •12.4 Virulence Factors
- •12.6.1 Fluconazole
- •12.6.2 Polyenes
- •12.6.3 Echinocandins
- •12.7 Drug Resistance
- •12.8 Future Prospects
- •12.9 Conclusions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.4 Translation Research
- •13.4.1 Disease-Oriented Translational Research
- •13.4.2 Lab-Oriented Translational Research
- •13.4.3 Patient-Oriented Translational Research
- •13.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.3 Cutaneous Aspergillosis
- •14.2.4 Ocular Aspergillosis
- •14.2.5 Aspergillus Endocarditis
- •14.2.6 Aspergillus Osteomyelitis
- •14.2.7 Sinus Aspergillosis
- •14.3.2 Histopathology
- •14.3.3 Serological
- •14.3.4 Breath Testing
- •14.3.5 Monoclonal Antibody (mAbs)-Mediated Methods
- •14.4.1 Conventional Therapeutics
- •14.4.1.1 Azoles
- •14.4.1.2 Polyenes
- •14.4.1.3 Echinocandins
- •14.4.1.4 Fluoropyrimidines
- •14.5 Nonconventional Therapeutics
- •14.5.1 Vaccine
- •14.5.2 Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs)
- •14.5.3 Nanotechnology-Based Therapeutics
- •14.5.4 Immune Therapy
- •14.5.5 Combination Therapy
- •14.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •15: Aspergillus Therapeutics: Future Agents
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2.1 Fosmanogepix
- •15.2.2 Ibrexafungerp
- •15.2.3 Olorofim
- •15.2.4 Opelconazole
- •15.2.5 Rezafungin
- •15.2.6 MGCD290
- •15.2.7 Tetrazoles (VT-1129/VT-1161/VT-1598)
- •15.2.8 Nikkomycin Z
- •15.2.9 VL-2397
- •15.2.10 T-2307/ATI-2307
- •15.2.11 Encochleated Amphotericin-B
- •15.2.12 SUBA-Itraconazole
- •15.2.13 Immunotherapy
- •15.2.14 Drug Repurposing
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Antifungal Agents
- •16.2.1 Azoles
- •16.2.2 Posaconazole
- •16.2.3 Isavuconazole
- •16.2.4 SUBA—Itraconazole
- •16.2.5 Nanovoriconazole
- •16.2.6 Adverse Effects
- •16.3 Liposomal Amphotericin B (LAMB)
- •16.3.1 Echinocandins
- •16.4 Combination Antifungal Therapy
- •16.5 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM)
- •16.5.1 Azole-Resistant Aspergillus Spp.
- •16.6 Guideline Recommendations
- •16.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.3 Potent Antifungal Molecules Under Investigations
- •References
- •19.2 Host–A. fumigatus Interactions
- •19.3.1 Hydrophobicity or Rodlet Layer
- •19.3.2 Conidiation
- •19.3.3 DHN Melanin
- •19.3.5 Siderophores
- •19.3.6 Biofilm Formation
- •19.4 Conclusion
- •References

14 Therapeutic Strategies and Challenges in the Management of Aspergillus…
343
determination guides the incorporation of AmB in treatment. The mAb AB90-E8
offers a specic means of identifying A. fumigatus. It can be applied for immunostaining procedures on fungal culture materials making it an alternative to intraoperative biopsy of specimen (Kakoschke etal. 2023).
14.4 Therapeutics intheTreatment ofAspergillus Infections:
Conventional Strategies andRecent Advancements
Therapeutics for Aspergillus infection are interventions designed to alleviate or prevent the disease. Therapeutic approaches can broadly be categorized into conventional and non-conventional depending upon their implementation in clinical
settings. These therapeutic strategies can either be employed to address the infection itself or manage its associated signs and symptoms, preventive measures, and
palliative care. Figure14.1 illustrates the mechanism of action of commonly used
drugs for treating Aspergillus infections.
Fig. 14.1 Mechanism of action of commonly used antifungal drugs: Azoles, polyenes
(Amphotericin B), echinocandins, and uoropyrimidines are key agents which target the components essential for fungal viability. Azoles (lower left): inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis by blocking
the cytochrome P450 enzyme 14-α demethylase, essential for fungal cell membrane integrity.
Amphotericin B, a type of polyene (upper left): binds to ergosterol, creating pores in the fungal cell
membrane and causing leakage of ions, leading to fungal cell death. Echinocandins (upper right):
reduce cell wall strength by inhibiting glucan synthase, thereby limiting the incorporation of glucose monomers, and resulting in cell lysis. Fluoropyrimidines (lower right): interfere with thymidine synthesis, disrupting deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and preventing fungal growth

344
D. Das et al.
14.4.1 Conventional Therapeutics
The rst approach to reduce the fungal burden of Aspergillus is to avoid high-risk
environments, such as places with decomposing organic matter and mold-infested
indoor spaces. However, due to the ubiquitous nature of this fungi, the reduction of
fungal burden in affected patients becomes challenging (Tracy etal. 2016). The rst
line of therapy begins using antifungal agents to counteract this clinical challenge.
The antifungal agents can be broadly classied into azoles, polyenes, echinocandins, and uoropyrimidines.
14.4.1.1 Azoles
The antifungal agent azole functions by impeding the biosynthesis of ergosterol.
This inhibition occurs through the blocking of 14-α demethylase, a cytochrome
P450 enzyme responsible for catalyzing the conversion of lanosterol into ergosterol.
Ergosterol is a component of the fungal cell membrane responsible for membrane
uidity and permeability. Lack of Ergosterol leads to weakening of fungal cell
membrane which eventually inhibits fungal growth (Tatsumi etal. 2013). Due to its
broad-spectrum effect, azoles are used to treat fungal infections caused by candidiasis, aspergillosis, cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and others. Azoles can be administered orally, topically, or intravenously,
depending on the type and severity of the infection.
14.4.1.2 Polyenes
Amphotericin B, nystatin, and hamycin are the most used polyenes. The mechanism
of action of polyenes is slightly different from azoles. They bind to ergosterol, creating pores in the fungal cell membrane. Through these pores’ monovalent ions and
other cytoplasmic contents leak out, leading to fungal cell death. In the secondary
mechanism of action, the disruption of membrane permeability brought about by
the release of free radicals is attributed to the interaction between polyenes and
lipoproteins (Scorzoni etal. 2017). The broad-spectrum effect of polyenes makes
them useful for treating yeasts and mold infections. Polyenes are usually administered intravenously for systemic infections or topically for supercial infections.
14.4.1.3 Echinocandins
CSF, micafungin (MCF), and anidulafungin (ANF) are the echinocandins available
in the clinical market. Intravenously administered echinocandins inhibits glucan
synthase in turn blocking the synthesis of β-1,3 glucans (Odds etal. 2003). The
inhibition of glucan synthase decreases the incorporation of glucose monomers
linking β-1,3 and β-1,6 glucans. Consequently, the fungal cell wall weakens, and
lysis of the cell is observed (Song and Stevens 2016). Unlike azoles and polyenes,
echinocandins are more specic antifungal drugs. They are effective against fungi
having β-(1,3)--glucan in their cell wall, such as Candida and Aspergillus species
(Patil and Majumdar 2017).

14 Therapeutic Strategies and Challenges in the Management of Aspergillus…
345
14.4.1.4 Fluoropyrimidines
Fluoropyrimidines are antimetabolites with fungicidal activity. Pyrimidine analogue ucytosine (5-FC) operates within the nucleus of the fungus, impacting the
synthesis of proteins and DNA.Fluoropyrimidines inhibit the enzyme thymidylate
synthase, which are involved in the synthesis of thymidine, a component of DNA.By
reducing the amount of thymidine, uoropyrimidines interfere with DNA replication and prevent fungal growth. Fluoropyrimidines are effective against fungi that
have thymidine kinase in their cells, such as Cryptococcus neoformans and
Pneumocystis jirovecii. Fluoropyrimidines are administered orally or intravenously
for systemic infections (Carmona and Limper 2017).
14.5 Nonconventional Therapeutics
14.5.1 Vaccine
Currently, there is an absence of an approved vaccine against aspergillosis and
majority of them are still lurking in preclinical testing stage. The hindrance in development of vaccines targeting aspergillosis is due to multitude of immunological
deciencies observed in affected patients. Those susceptible to IA typically exhibit
profound immunosuppression, which severely hampers their ability to mount effective immune responses following vaccination (Levitz and Golenbock 2012). The
vaccines in the developmental stage can be categorized into four main types: broadspectrum, whole-cell, subunit, and therapeutic.
Broad-spectrum vaccines leverage on common antigens present in multiple
disease- causing fungi and provide protection against a wide spectrum of fungal
diseases (Stevens etal. 2011). The Cassone laboratory carried out an in-vivo experiment in Aspergillus-infected mice using diphtheria toxoid linked to β-1,3--glucan
(in the form of laminarin) which generated a strong antibody response against
β-1,3--glucan leading to protection against Aspergillus (Torosantucci etal. 2005).
Clemons etal. immunized mice with heat-killed Saccharomyces cerevisiae and suc-
cessfully established protection against ve different fungal species, including
A. fumigatus (Stevens etal. 2011). Wuthrich etal. identied a T-cell epitope within
the protein calnexin. Calnexin is a highly conserved protein, expressed on the surface of fungi belonging to Ascomycota phylum which also houses Aspergillus species. They established that vaccination of mice with calnexin led to the proliferation
of antigen-specic CD4+ T cells (Wüthrich etal. 2015).
Whole organism vaccines contain whole A. fumigatus cells (live or inactivated)
or its components generated from culture ltrates. Cenci etal. segregated the mice
into three groups, vaccinating one group with live A. fumigatus, second group with
heat-killed A. fumigatus, and the third group received crude culture ltrate delivered
through three intranasal inhalations (Cenci et al. 2000). Subsequently, the mice
were immunosuppressed using cyclophosphamide and exposed to A. fumigatus

346
D. Das et al.
conidia via intranasal or intravenous routes. While the survival of mice that received
heat-killed fungi was not signicantly prolonged, those vaccinated with live
A. fumigatus or the crude ltrate demonstrated substantial protection (Cenci
etal. 1999).
A diverse range of Aspergillus subunit vaccines consisting of one or more puri-
ed constituents has undergone preclinical testing. In laboratory, the recombinant
proteins Asp f3, Gel1, Asp f9 (Crf1), Asp f16, and Pep1, derived from Aspergillus,
have demonstrated the ability to trigger vaccine-induced protection against aspergillosis (Bozza etal. 2009; Ito etal. 2006). This study also found that intranasal vaccination with α- and β-1,3--glucans resulted in protection, while GM was unable
to do the same (Bozza etal. 2009).
The therapeutic vaccines aim to stimulate the patient’s immune system leading
to an immune response to counteract and ultimately gain control over, or ideally
eradicate, an already established infectious pathogen within the host (Kosinska
etal. 2017). It has been observed that injecting CD4+ T cells exhibiting specicity
for Aspergillus fungus proved efcacious in extending the survival period of mice
which underwent allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation and developed IA (Bozza
etal. 2003).
This preclinical investigation laid the foundation for proceeding into clinical trial
involving human subjects who had contracted IA after undergoing haploidentical
hematopoietic transplantation (Perruccio etal. 2005). In this clinical trial, CD4+ T
cells were extracted from donors exposed to heat-killed Aspergillus conidia. These
T cells having the capacity to produce interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) were expanded
in-vitro and altered genetically to express the B-glucan recognition receptor known
as Dectin-1. Modied T cells exhibited a strong afnity for and was effectively
fungicidal against A. fumigatus (Kumaresan etal. 2014).
Fernandes and colleagues developed the mutant strain DsglA of A. fumigatus by
eliminating the sgIA gene, which codes for steryl glucosides (SGs), a group of glycolipids with immunomodulatory properties, were found to accumulate in the
mutant strain. This DsglA mutant showed loss of infectivity in two different murine
models of IA.There was a complete eradication of fungal infection from the lungs
of the mice. Corticosteroid treatment or cyclophosphamide administration led to
immunosuppression of a group of mice. These immunosuppressed mice were vaccinated with either live or heat-killed DsglA conidia and were able to pose a protection against a lethal challenge with the wild-type A. fumigatus. These results depict
the promising potential of strains that accumulate SGs as a safe and effective foundation for vaccine formulations aimed against invasive fungal infections (Fernandes
etal. 2022).
Puried antigens require the help of stimulating adjuvants or delivery systems to
elicit robust immune responses (Levitz and Golenbock 2012). β-1,3--glucan, a
carbohydrate antigen, normally has low immunogenicity, but its conjugation with a
protein carrier resulted in enhanced specic antibody responses (Torosantucci etal.
2005). Alum is a commonly utilized adjuvant in commercially available vaccines. It
works by driving the immune response toward antibodies and Th2 cell-mediated

14 Therapeutic Strategies and Challenges in the Management of Aspergillus…
347
immunity. Bozza etal. demonstrated the induction of Th1-mediated responses in
mice exposed to live A. fumigatus or A. fumigatus RNA by injecting unmodied
dendritic cells (DCs) as well as genetically modied DCs. Mice that received DCs
exposed to heat-killed A. fumigatus exhibited improved survival rates and reduced
fungal burdens (Shao etal. 2005). Other studies have effectively employed adjuvants such as unmethylated CpG-rich oligonucleotides (recognized by TLR9) and
TiterMax® in conjunction with Aspergillus vaccines (Bozza etal. 2002, 2009; Ito
etal. 2006). Intriguingly, certain candidate antigens, such as Asp f3 and Asp f9, pos-
sess IgE-binding epitopes which have been categorized as allergens (Lehrnbecher
etal. 2013). Administering these antigens with appropriate adjuvants has proven to
induce protective responses in mice. This suggests the possibility of utilizing adjuvanted vaccines in individuals with allergic aspergillosis, with the goal of steering
detrimental atopic responses toward more balanced and harmonized immune reactions (Ito etal. 2006).
14.5.2 Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs)
Immune therapy utilizing mAbs follows certain key mechanisms of action, such as
intervening in the attachment of the pathogen, preventing the germination of conidia,
hindering growth of fungal hyphae, and inhibiting fungal protease activity. The
mAbs are also capable of stimulating the host’s immune system and can take part in
transportation of drugs to specic sites of action which is marked by decreased side
effects (Lian etal. 2022b).
An interesting study on monoclonal antibody MAb R-5 (IgM) targeting the eno-
lase cell surface protein of A. fumigatus has been conducted by Yadav etal. The
antibody was found to signicantly inhibit spore germination in A. fumigatus
(88.3%) as well as in A. avus (57.4%) and A. niger (30.6%) in-vitro. mAb R-5 also
exhibited fungicidal activity with varying effectiveness. There was a 24.1% reduction in A. fumigatus, 13.3% in A. avus, and 8.8% in A. niger. Promising result was
seen in-vivo as well. The BALB/c mice, which was intravenously infected with
A. fumigatus spores, showed a striking 85.9% reduction in kidney tissue colonyforming units. The mice treated with mAb R-5 had an increased mean survival time
of 18.5days compared to the control group’s 6.5days. This research clearly depicts
that mAb R-5 has incredible potential for both diagnostics and therapeutics against
a wide range of Aspergillus infections (Yadav and Shukla 2019).
In another study, Lian etal. developed mAb 1D2 that targets an Aspergillus cell
wall glycoprotein. This antibody was found to inhibit Aspergillus conidia growth in
a dose-dependent manner as well as was successful in blocking conidia attachment
to untreated and bronectin-treated surfaces, unlike an unrelated antibody, 6B10.
When mAb 1D2 was applied with conidia inoculation, it prevented swelling and
germination, but unfortunately, this effect diminished when it was added 2h postinoculation. Further observation showed the capability of mAb 1D2 in causing
damage to Aspergillus hyphae. The inhibitory effect of mAb 1D2 on clinically

348
D. Das et al.
relevant Aspergillus species and mAb 1D2 having a potential as a prophylactic
agent were evident in this study (Lian etal. 2022a).
14.5.3 Nanotechnology-Based Therapeutics
Nanoscience has extended its support in combating a multitude of disease.
Nanoscience deals with creation of nanoparticles, and using them to craft a whole
array of incredible products. Nanoparticles are minuscule particles at the nanoscale,
typically measuring between 1 and 100nm in size. The most remarkable aspect lies
in their property of increased surface area due to their nano-size, allowing delivery
of multiple drugs or imaging agents when battling cancer, infections, and diagnosing diseases. From sustained drug release to resilience against metabolic breakdown, enhanced treatment outcomes and the potential to circumvent drug resistance
mechanisms make nanoparticles a superhero boost for medicine. Metallic nanoparticles’ lipid-based nanosystems and nanoemulsions (NEs) hold the promise to conquer the challenges encountered against treatment of Aspergillus infections (Peer
etal. 2007).
Among metallic nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles (AgNP) have exhibited sig-
nicant potential in inhibiting fungal growth and preventing the development of
resistance in microorganisms (Baygar etal. 2019). It has also been observed that
even at low concentrations, AgNP shows promise in inhibiting the biosynthesis of
mycotoxins (Jesmin and Chanda 2020).
The eco-friendly and sustainable synthesis (Green Synthesis) of AgNP, was car-
ried out utilizing F. chlamydosporum and P. chrysogenum, which effectively sup-
pressed the growth of A. avus and completely halted its aatoxin production
(Khalil etal. 2019). The internalization of these AgNP is believed to occur primarily
within endosomes. They are conjectured to exert a signicant inuence on the fungal cells’ oxidative stress response and secondary metabolism. Furthermore, they
have been found to elevate the expression of superoxide dismutase transcripts,
which is associated with the inhibition of aatoxin production(Jesmin and
Chanda 2020).
Quirós etal. devised a nanosystem featuring electrospun cellulose acetate as the
matrix for encapsulating silver and copper nanoparticles. This nanosystem was reinforced with sepiolite and mesoporous silica, yielding membranes that exhibited
remarkable fungistatic properties against A. niger. The controlled release of metallic ions was enabled through the incorporation of mesoporous silica nanoparticles
(MSNs). Consequently, the antifungal effects were enhanced through a synergistic
approach, where the combined utilization of metallic nanoparticles and MSNs led
to optimized antifungal efcacy (Quirós etal. 2016).
In a clinical study involving 174 patients with IA, the effectiveness and tolerabil-
ity of the sodium cholesteryl sulfate lipid complex containing Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) were compared to conventional Amphotericin B (AmB).
The study focused on drug-related adverse events. Patients treated with ABCD

14 Therapeutic Strategies and Challenges in the Management of Aspergillus…
349
experienced higher rates of side effects, such as chills (53% vs. 30%), fever (27%
vs. 16%), and hypoxia (1% vs. 4%) compared to those treated with AmB.However,
the ABCD group had slightly fewer drug-related toxicities leading to treatment discontinuation (22% vs. 24%). Importantly, ABCD’s antifungal efcacy was similar
to that of AmB.These ndings suggest that ABCD could be a potential alternative
for IA treatment (Bowden etal. 2002).
NEs represent colloidal dispersions composed of two non-miscible phases,
which can either comprise oil-in-water or water-in-oil congurations, and are
upheld through the utilization of a suitable surfactant for stabilization (Mason etal.
2006; Singh etal. 2017). A study was conducted to develop Amphotericin B (AmB)-
loaded NEs using Capmul PG8 and lipid-based surfactants, which demonstrated
zones of inhibition with an average measurement of 19.1±1.4 when tested against
A. niger. Through ex vitro investigations, it was shown that this nanosystem demonstrated enhanced AmB release and exhibited the most efcient penetration through
the stratum corneum barrier, surpassing both the AmB drug solution and Fungisome®
(a commercially available liposomal AmB medication) (Hussain etal. 2016). In an
alternative framework, NE has presented an enhanced nanosystem that aims to
enhance the localized antifungal efcacy of AmB while minimizing the potential
for systemic absorption (Sosa etal. 2017). While drug-loaded NEs have demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of topical fungal infections, further research is
needed to assess their efcacy in combating invasive fungal infections.
14.5.4 Immune Therapy
The innate and adaptive immune cells of our body confer immune response against
A. fumigatus. By utilizing the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, TLR 4, Dectin-1, and
Melanin-sensing C-type Lectin receptor (MelLec), the macrophages are able to recognize different fungal forms, such as conidia and hyphae (Briard etal. 2021). The
innate immune cells are activated by inammatory cytokines and chemokines. The
adaptive immune cells are brought into the eld of defense by the DCs through
processing and presenting of fungal antigens (Buil etal. 2016). In addition to all
other immune cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells play pivotal roles in conferring immunity against A. fumigatus. After a long period of observation, it has been observed
that patients with IPA who exhibit higher levels of A. fumigatus-specic T cells
capable of producing interferon-γ (IFN-γ) are likely to experience more positive
clinical outcomes (Hebart etal. 2002; Jolink etal. 2014). This signicant observation has acted as the rst stepping stone for the ongoing research into the potential
use of A. fumigatus-specic T cells derived from the patient’s own T-cell repertoire
for adoptive transfer as a supportive therapy in IPA patients (Castellano-Gonzalez
etal. 2017).
Michelle Seif et al. designed Af-CAR T cells featuring a targeting domain
(AB90-E8) designed to detect a conserved protein antigen in the cell wall of
A. fumigatus hyphae. These engineered T cells are capable of recognizing various

350
D. Das et al.
A. fumigatus strains. CD8+ Af-CAR T cells ght against the A. fumigatus hyphae by
releasing perforin and granzyme B.Both CD8+ and CD4+ Af-CAR T cells produce
cytokines that activate macrophages, enhancing the antifungal effect. Michelle Seif
etal. also compared the effectiveness between CD8+ Af-CAR T cells and CD4+
Af-CAR T cells. CD8+ Af-CAR T cells proved to be more effective and improved
overall survival in mice model of IPA was observed. This recent research provides
a valuable support for proceeding with Af-CAR-T-cell therapy against IPA (Seif
etal. 2022).
14.5.5 Combination Therapy
The utilization of two or more antifungal drugs to treat aspergillosis is termed combination therapy. This therapeutic approach is undertaken to achieve synergistic
effects by targeting different stages of the fungal life cycle and to reduce the risk of
developing drug resistance (Marr et al. 2004). Due to the high mortality rate
observed in cases of aspergillosis, combination therapy has been gaining interest to
improve patient outcomes.
The integration of animal models and retrospective data has showcased improved
survival rates achieved through a combined strategy incorporating both triazole and
echinocandin. A prospective clinical trial compared the efcacy of voriconazole
alone to the combination of voriconazole and ANF.While differences were observed
in the primary outcome, these distinctions did not reach statistical signicance
(P=0.087), and no notable variance in adverse events was noted. A subset analysis
focusing on patients with probable disease revealed a statistically signicant
improvement in outcomes (P<0.05), indicating reduced mortality. While the option
of combination therapy could be contemplated for certain individuals, it is currently
not recommended as a routine course of action (Marr etal. 2015).
An improved survival rate was observed when the combination of voriconazole
and CSF was used compared to voriconazole alone. This combination therapy was
associated with reduced mortality, compared with therapy with voriconazole.
Newer data regarding the treatment of IA indicate that a combined approach using
voriconazole and echinocandins could be benecial for specic patients (Livengood
etal. 2020). It is important to contemplate the possibility of combining voriconazole with either CSF or MCF in pediatric cases. Determining the optimal voriconazole dosage for each child is crucial due to signicant variations in metabolism.
Table 14.1 summarizes the novel approaches being undertaken for treating
Aspergillus infections.

14 Therapeutic Strategies and Challenges in the Management of Aspergillus…
Banchereau and Steinman
References
(1998)
Bacher etal. (2015)
351
Clinical Nagai etal. (1995)
Promotes activation of macrophages and neutrophils, aiding in
Mode of action Study design
Aspergillus conidia clearance from the lungs
In-vitro Winn etal. (2003)
Preclinical Romani etal. (1997)
−
immune cells for Aspergillus conidia clearance in the lungs, and
induce nitric oxide (NO) to inhibit Aspergillus hyphae growth
In vitro and
)
2
leukocytes (PMNL), measured by increased superoxide anion (O
release in response to A. fumigatus, but not to A. avus
preclinical
molecules, migrates to lymphoid organs, and releases cytokines to
Clinical Zhang etal. (2021) and
trigger immune responses
clearance in the lungs
In vitro Lian etal. (2022a)
from adhering to a composite surface and bronectin
Inhibits aatoxin production In vitro Khalil etal. (2019)
Not known In vitro Punia etal. (2020)
Binds to sterols (ergosterol) in the cell membrane Clinical Bowden etal. (2002)
Strategy
Cytokines and immunostimulants
a. IFNγ
Table 14.1 Novel approaches for treating Aspergillus infections
b. TNF-α Enhances IFN-γ production by T cells and NK cells, activates
c. IL-15 2h treatment enhances the oxidative burst in polymorphonuclear
Cellular therapy
a. Dendritic cell (DC) immune therapy DC captures and processes antigens, expresses co-stimulatory
b. NK cell therapy Not known In vitro and clinical Stuehler etal. (2015)
c. Adoptive T cell transfer Stimulates macrophages and neutrophils for Aspergillus conidia
d. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy Targets surface carbohydrates on A. fumigatus conidia Preclinical Kumaresan etal. (2014)
Monoclonal antibody therapy
mesoporous AgNP
chrysogenum
a. mAb R-5 (IgM) Targets the enolase cell surface protein of A. fumigatus Preclinical Yadav and Shukla (2019)
b. mAb 1D2 Targets an Aspergillus cell wall glycoprotein. It prevents Aspergillus
Nano-system therapy
a. Biogenic AgNP by F. chlamydosporus or P.
containing amphotericin B (ABCD)
b. Polylactic Acid Nanoowers incorporating
c. Sodium cholesteryl sulfate lipid complex

352
D. Das et al.
14.6 Antifungal Drug Resistance andIts
Molecular Mechanism
The rise of azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. has had an inuence on therapeutic decisions notably. Resistance can emerge following prolonged therapy, particularly in
individuals with chronic cavitary disease. In addition, there may be instances of de
novo resistance, particularly in areas where azoles are extensively utilized in agriculture (Wiederhold and Verweij 2020).
Efux pumps are membrane proteins that can transport substances out of the
cell, such as drugs, toxins, or metabolites. Some fungi have efux pumps that can
recognize and expel azole antifungals from the cell, reducing their intracellular concentration and effectiveness. Efux pumps fall into two primary families: ATPbinding cassette transporters and major facilitator superfamily transporters. These
pumps use a proton electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane to
extrude substrates (Cannon etal. 2009). Fungi can develop resistance to azoles by
increasing the expression or activity of these efux pumps, either by mutations or
by induction. The target enzyme of azoles is sterol 14α-demethylase (Cyp51A),
which is involved in the synthesis of ergosterol. Azoles bind to the heme group of
Cyp51A and inhibit its function, leading to reduced ergosterol production and
impaired membrane integrity. Fungi can develop resistance to azoles by altering the
structure or function of Cyp51A, either by point mutations or by recombination
with other Cyp51 genes (Xie etal. 2014). Aspergillus spp. have two genes that code
for 14-α-demethylase: CYP51A and CYP51B.However, most of the azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. is due to mutations in CYP51A (Gonçalves etal. 2016).
There are different types of mutations in CYP51A, such as point mutations (changes
in a single nucleotide) or non-synonymous mutations (changes in an amino acid).
These mutations can confer different levels of resistance to different azoles. For
instance, some non-synonymous mutations in amino acids 98, 138, 220, 431, 434,
and 448 can make Aspergillus spp. resistant to all azoles (Howard etal. 2009).
These changes can reduce the afnity or increase the turnover of Cyp51A for azoles,
resulting in decreased inhibition. ERG11 is the gene that encodes Cyp51A in fungi.
Fungi can develop resistance to azoles by increasing the expression of ERG11,
either by gene amplication, duplication, or upregulation. This can result in
increased production of Cyp51A, which can overcome the inhibitory effect of
azoles by saturating their binding sites or by increasing the residual activity of the
enzyme (Berman and Krysan 2020). It is not easy to manage patients with azoleresistant infection. Mostly, lipid AmB products and combination therapy with an
azole or echinocandin are the potential treatment options (Berman and Krysan 2020).
The primary changes linked to polyene resistance occur in the enzymes involved
in the manufacture of ergosterol. Aspergillus strains are generally resistant to AmB
without changing their ergosterol concentration. A. terreus AmB resistance has
been linked to a number of processes, including Hsp90 and Hsp70 blocking the Ras
signaling pathway and preventing the development of aqueous pores (Blatzer etal.
2015; Blum etal. 2013).
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
