Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5219_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
3 Candidiasis Treatment: An Evolutionary Journey from Past to Present and…
antibiotics. In a similar way, allergens containing foods should be avoided since they compromise immune function, making it easier for infections to invade (Martins etal. 2014). Vegetables, legumes, whole grains, and protein sources like sh, meat, and organic poultry are all free of limitations and can be consumed with­out any obstacles (Eggimann etal. 2003). Additionally, it is advised to regularly consume oat bran and/or axseed for their antifungal properties as well as their ber-rich content (Gul etal. 2016).
67
3.2.2 Strengthening theImmune System
The immune system is weakened (usually depressed) in most chronic candidiasis cases, which allows Candida species to proliferate easily (Truss 1981; Martins etal.
2014). Restoring proper immune function is therefore one of the main objectives in
the treatment of chronic candidiasis. The management of stress, restricted diet, exercise, glandular therapy, nutritional supplementation, and the use of plant-based medications are some strategies that could be employed to accomplish this goal. Particularly, improving the thymus gland function is essential as clinical remission of candidiasis is directly reliant on T-cell function (Chotprakaikiat 2016; Bappy etal. 2023). Therefore, nutritional supplementation is required to guarantee an ade­quate intake of antioxidants, including carotenes, vitamin A, vitamin E, zinc, and selenium. Plants like Glycyrrhiza glabra, Hydrastis canadensis, and Echinacea angustifolia could be added to this intervention (Truss 1981; Shahar etal. 1995; de Wet etal. 1999; McGirt and Martins 2004).
3.2.3 Toxification
Liver damage is a common cause of both the chronic fatigue and chronic candidiasis because it severely impairs immunological function when the liver is harmed by chemicals and other factors. Therefore, to maximize the chances of a successful therapy for candidiasis, enhanced liver function is crucial prior to, during, and even following antiyeast treatments (Martins etal. 2014; Manik and Bahl 2017). Liver function improvement and detoxication can be achieved through with provided suggestion mentioned in Table3.1.
3.2.4 Alternative Treatments
To treat the infection, natural antiyeast medicines that have been shown to be effective against Candida spp. can be used in addition to conventional therapies (Galgóczy etal. 2019; Rodrigues etal. 2019). However, predisposing factors to chronic candidiasis, nutrition, and lifestyle should also be considered for this therapy to be effective as a main treatment. The most researched natural agents against Candida spp. include probiotics, garlic, caprylic acid, tea tree oil,
68
Table 3.1 A list of liver function improvement and detoxication process (Barker 2007; Fife
2017; Manik and Bahl 2017; Ganea 2021)
Procedures
Improve liver function
Improve detoxication
1. Prioritize cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and leafy greens. These are rich in antioxidants and phytonutrients that aid your liver’s detoxication process
2. Limit alcohol intake. Excessive consumption strains your liver, so drink moderately or abstain completely
3. Exercise on most days. Regular physical activity reduces liver fat and inammation
4. To reduce toxin exposure, avoid harmful substances such as excess medications and environmental pollutants
1. Focus on ber-rich fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
2. Limit your intake of processed foods, sugary beverages, and unhealthy fats
3. Maintain adequate hydration throughout the day
4. Get regular exercise to increase circulation and sweating
5. Get enough sleep to help your liver detoxify properly
6. Meditation, yoga, and relaxation techniques can all help you manage stress
7. Consider incorporating prebiotics and probiotics to improve gut health
8. Consider liver-supportive herbs such as milk thistle or dandelion root (consult a doctor rst)
9. Reduce your exposure to toxins from cleaning products, cosmetics, and the environment
M. N. I. Bappy et al.
berberine-containing plants, grape fruit seed extract, and enteric coated volatile oil preparations containing oregano, thyme, peppermint, and rosemary; propo­lis; ginger; and cinnamon (Cardoso etal. 2012; Irfana and Selvam 2019; Bappy etal. 2023). Natural agents used as alternative treatments against candidiasis is given in Table3.2. Using an efcient antiyeast therapy frequently results in the quick removal of microorganisms and subsequent absorption of a substantial amount of yeast toxins, cell particles, and antigens and the Herxheimer reaction. The aforementioned reaction can be avoided by promoting liver function, fol­lowing dietary guidelines, and starting antiyeast drugs at low doses and gradu­ally increasing the doses (Murray and Pizzorno 1998; McGirt and Martins 2004; Martins etal. 2014).
3 Candidiasis Treatment: An Evolutionary Journey from Past to Present and…
Table 3.2 List of natural agents used as alternative treatments against candidiasis
Name Dosage/description Substances Fiber supplement Guar gum, pectin, or psyllium seeds (one
teaspoon before bedtime)
Formulated multivitamin and mineral complex with high potency
Selenium 200 g/day Zinc picolinate 45mg/day Probiotics (intestinal
ora) Caprylic acid Formula of slow liberation (1g with meals)
Phytocompound Citrus paradise
(grapefruit) seed extract Origanum vulgare
(oregano) oil
Allium sativum (garlic) Actual recommendations are based on allin
Berberis vulgaris
(barberry)
Tabebuia impetiginosa (lapacho)
Hydrastis canadensis (goldenseal)
Collected from Manik and Bahl (2017)
Hypoallergenic formulas, free of yeasts
Products containing Lactobacillus
200mg, 2–3 times/day
To avoid digestive discomfort, take 300–500mg in capsule or liquid form three times per day with meals
(10mg) and allicin (4000 µg), which is equivalent to 4000mg fresh garlic or 500–1000mg aged garlic
The following doses, three times/day Dried bark of the root (as tea): 1–2g Tincture (1:5): 4–6mL Liquid extract (1:1): 0.5–2mL Powdered solid extract (4:1): 250–500mg
15–20g of bark in 0.5L boiling water for 5–15min, 3–4 times/day
The following doses, three times/day Dried root (as tea): 1–2g Tincture (1:5): 4–6mL (1–1 and teaspoon) Liquid extract (1:1): 0.5–2mL Powdered solid extract (4:1): 250–500mg
69
3.3 Prophylaxis, Preemptive, andEmpirical Therapies
Invasive candidiasis has long been acknowledged as an important clinical phenom­enon, especially in critically ill ICU patients, with crude death rates ranging from 40% to 60% (Playford etal. 2010; Soulountsi etal. 2021). Because of this, during the past 10years, early antifungal medications have been provided to nonneutropenic adults who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for a variety of reasons corresponding to preventive, preemptive, or empirical therapy. While the implemen­tation of early antifungal intervention measures in patients with minimal risk of inva­sive candidiasis may lead to better clinical results, it may also increase costs, cause toxicity, and put pressure on ecological selection for antifungal resistance. Therefore, in order to maximize benets and reduce harms, it is necessary to consider the sig­nicant and competing clinical and nancial impacts of the various techniques.
70
M. N. I. Bappy et al.
3.3.1 Prophylaxis
The administration of antifungal medications to patients who have risk factors for invasive candidiasis but do not exhibit any clinical infection signs and symptoms is commonly referred to as prophylaxis (Standaert-Vitse etal. 2006; Jawhara et al.
2008; Rüping etal. 2008). Even though the idea originated almost 40years ago,
clinical practice still faces many challenges with it. Even with many studies, it is still difcult to identify critically ill patients who need prophylaxis, or to decide which medication to use, when to start using it, how much to use, how long to use it, or what kind of monitoring is ideal for this procedure (Martins etal. 2014). There are no clear denitions of the target population or durations of prophylaxis, and the current IDSA guidelines only recommend the use of uconazole or echinocandins in risky individuals in ICUs with high rates of invasive candidiasis (5%) rather than offering any specic recommendations (Martin 1999).
3.3.2 Preemptive Therapies
Treatment that is started in response to one or more biological indicators of infec­tion risk is known as preemptive therapy. In the context of invasive candidiasis, these biomarkers could be fungal antigens like (1,3)-b--glucan or Candida coloni­zation parameters (Cornu etal. 2018; Dupuis etal. 2021). Thus, prophylactic ther­apy and preemptive therapy are paradigms that conceptually overlap, especially when one applies Candida colonization parameters. Some authors refer to treated patients as having received empirical therapy, while others refer to preemptive or presumptive therapy, which has led to confusion regarding the concept of preemp­tive strategy. Apart from differences in terminology, there is a lack of clarity regard­ing the methods for identifying the target population, despite suggestions to use biomarkers to direct prescriptions (Chi etal. 2011).
3.3.3 Empirical Therapies
A balanced approach between appropriateness (of dosage and range of activity) and timing is required for empirical therapy. It has been demonstrated that early inter­vention lowers mortality, which is a treatment goal (Espinel-Ingroff 1998; Lee etal.
2000). To establish criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in critically ill
nonneutropenic patients, more research is required. In patients with risk factors for invasive candidiasis and no other known cause of fever, empirical treatment is typi­cally considered based on clinical evaluation of factors associated with risk, sero­logical indicators for invasive candidiasis, and/or culture results obtained from nonsterile sites. With between 45% and 65% of all prescriptions in European ICUs going toward early antifungal therapy, there is growing concern about whether or not toxicity, cost, and resistance development warnings are being disregarded (Lee etal. 2000; Parslow and Thornton 2022).
3 Candidiasis Treatment: An Evolutionary Journey from Past to Present and…
71

3.4 Therapeutic Approach

In invasive Candida species infections, the most often employed antifungal agents are azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins. Individual isolates do not always follow the general pattern of Candida susceptibility to newly developed antifungal agents (Nguyen etal. 1998; Pfaller etal. 1998; Diekema etal. 2002) For example, Candida albicans is usually vulnerable to all major agents. However, azole resistance in this species is now well documented in those infected with HIV with frequent oropha­ryngeal candidiasis (Mulu etal. 2013), and it has also been identied in critically ill adults with invasive candidiasis (Powderly etal. 1999; Hamza et al. 2008). As a result, vulnerability testing for resistance to azole medications is increasingly being employed to direct candidiasis treatment in patients, particularly while the initial treatment with empirical agents fails. New insights have signicantly altered thera­peutic strategies in recent years.
3.4.1 Azoles
Azoles are a type of antifungal medication that is commonly used as the primary and most common treatment option for Candida infections (Sobel and Sobel 2018). In the azole-based family of substances, there are imidazoles (including ketocon­azole (KTC), miconazole, econazole, and clotrimazole) and triazoles, which (such as uconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole, with voriconazole being an articial triazole derived of the second-generation uconazole), alongside posaconazole (which is a hydroxylated analog of itraconazole) (Shukla etal. 2018). These chemi­cals can be taken orally, have little toxicity, and are successful in relieving symp­toms and eliminating Candida cultures in the vast majority of patients. Miconazole and KTC remained the rst azoles to emerge and were the only medications avail­able for systemic use at the time, with KTC serving as the principal substitute to AMB (Groll) (Spencer etal. 2023). Triazoles such as itraconazole and FLZ were then released, offering increased efcacy and tolerability over KTC (Jha etal. 2022).
FLZ is often used in the treatment of candidemia as a deescalation strategy, as well as in the management of noncritically ill patients who have never been exposed to azoles and have no evidence of azole-resistant strain colonization (Pristov and Ghannoum 2019). Its broad use in the treatment of Candida infections can be ascribed to its low toxicity and availability in a variety of formulations (Spampinato and Leonardi 2013). Nonetheless, ndings in the literature have emphasized the emergence of resistance, particularly in Candida species and their azole response. This highlights the necessity of studying fungal resistance mechanisms in order to create novel types of antifungal drugs for treating Candida infections.
Itraconazole is known for its efcacy against mucosal candidiasis and, when administered intravenously, can treat invasive illness (Martin 1999). Although itra­conazole is believed to have a similar prole to FLZ, the two substances have dis­tinct pharmacological properties and clinical activity against various fungal infections.
72
M. N. I. Bappy et al.
Voriconazole is available in both oral and parenteral formulations and is equally effective as FLZ in treating esophageal candidiasis (Vazquez 2010). However, cur­rent research has linked voriconazole to an increased risk of adverse effects. Notably, voriconazole has been shown to be effective against FLZ-resistant isolates (Pelletier etal. 2002). Furthermore, several azoles now in development, such as posaconazole and ravuconazole, show promise anti-Candida action invitro (Gowda etal. 2019).
3.4.1.1 Mode ofAction
Azoles primarily interact by interfering with ergosterol formation, which is an essential component of the fungal cell exterior (Nigam 2015). This method of action is unique to fungi because ergosterol has a structural homolog in human cells, cho­lesterol. Azoles impede ergosterol synthesis, causing structural alterations in fungal cell membranes and, ultimately, cell death (Haller 1985; Francois et al. 2006; Bondaryk etal. 2013).
One of the enzymatic processes in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway is the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol. FLZ, itraconazole, and KTC are azoles that inhibit the enzyme lanosterol 14-demethylase by attaching to an iron-containing heme group. This enzyme is essential for lanosterol demethylation, which allows it to proceed down the ergosterol production pathway (Bossche and Marichal 1991). When azoles inhibit the activity of lanosterol 14-demethylase, several important effects occur within the fungal cell:
Toxic Intermediate Accumulation Inhibiting the enzyme lanosterol
14- demethylase hinders the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol. As a result, a substance known as 14-methyl-3,6-diol accumulates within the fungal cell. This chemical is poisonous to fungal cells.
Membrane Destabilization The fungal cell membrane becomes structurally unstable when it lacks ergosterol. Ergosterol is required for membrane integrity and uidity. Without it, the membrane is more prone to injury and permeability variations.
Enhanced Membrane Permeability Changes in membrane composition caused by ergosterol biosynthesis disruption result in enhanced permeability. This increased permeability permits cellular contents to leak, destroys the cell’s capacity to main­tain osmotic equilibrium, and leads to cellular failure.
Fungistatic and Fungicidal Effects Azoles have fungistatic properties, which means they limit the growth and replication of Candida species. However, under some conditions, such as prolonged exposure or increased medication concentra­tions, they can transform into fungicidal agents, killing the fungal cells directly.
3.4.1.2 Resistance Mechanism toAzole
While azoles are quite effective, resistance can develop over time. Resistance mech­anisms include changes in the enzyme lanosterol 14-demethylase, which makes it
3 Candidiasis Treatment: An Evolutionary Journey from Past to Present and…
Fig. 3.1 Mode of action of therapeutics for candidiasis
73
less susceptible to azole inhibition, or increased activity of efux pumps (Fig.3.1), which remove the drug from the fungal cell (Nigam 2015). Antifungal resistance emphasizes the signicance of prudent and informed azole use, as well as suscepti­bility testing in cases of suspected resistance.
3.4.2 Echinocandins
Echinocandins are antifungal drugs that work by preventing the formation of -glucan in the fungal cell wall by noncompetitively inhibiting the enzyme 1,3-glucan synthase. Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin (Pfaller etal. 2008, 2009) are all mem­bers of this class. Caspofungin has been shown to be as effective as AMB deoxycholate and FLZ in the treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis (Arathoon etal.
2002; McCormack and Perry 2005) and is the rst licensed echinocandin antifungal
medication. It is worth noting that, like the other drugs in this category, caspofungin is only accessible in the parenteral form, and its primary mode of action is limited to Candida and Aspergillus species. Except for Aspergillus, echinocandins have little effect against Cryptococcus neoformans or lamentous fungi. This specicity is sig­nicant when considering their use as empirical treatment (Chen etal. 2011).
3.4.2.1 Mode ofAction
Their mechanism of action is intimately related to the chemical structure of the fungal cell wall, which is primarily composed of a complex sugar known as beta­(1,3)--glucan. Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin are echinocandins that specically inhibit (1,3)-beta--glucan synthase, the enzyme responsible for the production of beta-(1,3)--glucan (Chen etal. 2011; Curto etal. 2021).
Echinocandins bind to the enzyme’s active site, preventing it from performing its critical role in the synthesis of beta(1,3)--glucan. Without the synthesis of beta­(1,3)--glucan, the fungal cell cannot successfully develop or repair its cell wall.
74
M. N. I. Bappy et al.
The cell wall weakens and loses structural integrity. The weakened cell wall allows for greater permeability (Fig.3.1), allowing vital cellular components to leak. This reduces the fungal cell’s ability to maintain osmotic balance. As a result of continu­ous structural damage and permeability changes, the fungal cell eventually suc­cumbs to lysis, forcing its contents to spill out and resulting in cell death (Denning
1997; Fera etal. 2009).
3.4.2.2 Resistance toEchinocandins
Resistance to echinocandins can occur through a variety of mechanisms, but it is uncommon. Mutations in the fungal FKS genes encoding (1,3)-beta--glucan synthase alter the structure of the enzyme and reduce drug binding afnity. Some Candida species can also develop resistance to echinocandins by changing the structure of beta-(1,3)--glucan. Overexpression of efux pumps that expel the medication, genetic changes in regulatory pathways governing glucan synthesis, or changes in cell wall composition can all lead to resistance (Perlin 2015; Pristov and Ghannoum 2019). While echinocandin resistance is less common than resis­tance to other antifungal classes, understanding these pathways is critical for early detection and the development of effective treatment strategies when resistance is expected.
3.4.3 Polyenes
AMB is the most commonly used polyene medication in the treatment of fungal infections, with other chemicals in the same class including nystatin and natamycin (Carolus etal. 2020). These medications are not taken orally and are primarily used to treat fungal infections of the gastrointestinal tract, such as oral thrush. They must be taken intravenously for systemic fungal infections.
AMB has traditionally been used in its classic deoxycholate formulation. Three lipid-associated AMB formulations have been developed and licensed for human use: AMB lipid complex (ABLC), AMB colloidal dispersion (ABCD), and liposomal AMB (Bolard 1991; Gangadhar etal. 2014). The name of these substances, combined with the obligation to deliver lipid-associated formula­tions at substantially greater doses than deoxycholate formulations, has caused some consternation (Silva etal. 2011). It is critical to understand that (1) “lipo­somal amphotericin B” refers to a specic lipid-associated product; (2) “lipid­associated formulations of amphotericin B” is a broad term for the class; (3) these three lipid-associated AMB formulations have distinct pharmacological properties and rates of treatment-related adverse events and should not be used
3 Candidiasis Treatment: An Evolutionary Journey from Past to Present and…
75
interchangeably without careful consideration; and (4) the typical IV dose for AMB is 0.6–1.0mg/kg per day; and (5) the typical dosage for the lipid-associ­ated formulations when used for candidiasis is 3–5mg/kg per day (Pappas etal.
2004). While AMB deoxycholate was once the conventional treatment for inva-
sive candidiasis, its toxicity is now generally recognized. Previously, lipid-asso­ciated preparations were generally reserved for patients who were unable to tolerate deoxycholate formulations or had infections that were resistant to them.
3.4.3.1 Mode ofAction
AMB and other polyenes ght Candidiasis by binding to ergosterol, a component of the fungal cell membrane. This interaction compromises membrane integrity, result­ing in the formation of holes and an increase in membrane permeability (Brajtburg etal. 1990; Zarif etal. 2000). This increased permeability causes critical ion leakage, impairing the osmotic balance and function of the fungal cell and ultimately leading to cell death (Fig.3.1) (Carrillo-Munoz etal. 2006). Polyenes are distinct from fun­gistatic antifungals in that they cause direct cellular damage, making them effective against a broad range of fungus species, including Candida. Polyene resistance is possible, but it is less common than resistance to other antifungal medication classes.
3.4.3.2 Resistance toPolyenes
Resistance to polyenes, such as amphotericin B, in the treatment of Candidiasis can emerge via a variety of routes. Candida species may diminish ergosterol levels in cell membranes or replace it with other sterols, lowering polyene binding afn­ity. Improved efux pumps effectively remove the drug from the cell (Fig.3.1), lowering its concentration, whereas cell wall alterations can make the fungus more resistant (Carolus etal. 2020). Biolm production and heteroresistance, in which a subset of cells exhibits resistance, add to the difculties of treating Candidiasis using polyenes. Understanding these resistance pathways is critical for effective treatment and creating resistance-ghting tactics (Table3.3).
Numerous new classes of antifungal medicines are currently being developed as given in Table3.4. These medicines include both those with mechanisms of action similar to those found in existing therapeutic classes and those with unique mechanisms of action that are either specic to fungi or have a higher selectivity for fungal targets when compared to mammalian cells. Many of these medicines have shown signicant activity in both invitro and in vivo tests against a wide variety of fungus species. Furthermore, some of these novel antifungal drugs have shown effectiveness against azole and echinocandin-resistant isolates (Murphy and Bicanic 2021).
76
Benet/harm
Effective therapy has the
potential to save lives.
Nephrotoxicity caused by
amphotericin B can complicate
the care of critically ill patients
M. N. I. Bappy et al.
Because of the ambiguity of this
illness, medicines with reduced
toxicity are typically
recommended
Ineffective antifungal medication
may have unfavorable
epidemiological repercussions,
such as the selection of resistant
organisms
As part of the initial nonmedical management, all
existing central venous catheters (B-II) should be
removed if possible
The clinical condition of the patient determines which of
these treatments is used
Caspofungin experience is modest (a 70-mg loading
dosage followed by 50mg daily), but clinical activity is
excellent
For clinically stable individuals who have not previously
undergone azole medication (A-I), uconazole (6mg/kg
per day; i.e., 400mg/day for a 70-kg patient) is another
appropriate choice
Treatment options Recommendation
• Intravenous amphotericin B
• Intravenous or oral uconazole
• Intravenous caspofungin
• The combination of uconazole
plusamphotericin B
Name
Candidemia and
acute
hematogenously
disseminated
Table 3.3 A list of treatments options according to the types of candidiasis (Pappas etal. 2004)
candidiasis
A-I suggests a uconazole (800mg/day) and
amphotericin B deoxycholate e (0.7mg/kg per day for
the rst 5–6days) combination
Fluconazole (6–12mg/kg per day) has been used
satisfactorily in a small number of infants
If therapy is administered, it should only be given to
individuals who have (1) Candida species colonization
(ideally at several sites), (2) multiple additional risk
factors, and (3) no other untreated causes of fever (C-III)
The absence of Candida species colonization suggests a
lesser risk of invasive candidiasis and justies deferring
empirical therapy
• Intravenous amphotericin B
• Intravenous/oral uconazole
Empirical treatment
of febrile
nonneutropenic
patients with
suspected
disseminated
candidiasis