Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5219_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
210
Table 8.1 Classication of antifungals, their mechanism of action and known genetic mechanism through which resistance is acquired
Antifungals Polyenes By binding to ergosterol in the
Azole
Echinocandin
Flucytosine Flucytosine is converted to
Mechanism of action
fungal cell membrane, forming pores that disrupt cell integrity and lead to cell death
Inhibits the 14α-demethylase enzyme, which is essential for the production of ergosterol, a major component of fungal cell wall
Inhibiting the β-1,3-glucan synthase enzyme (Fks1), which is essential for the synthesis of β-1,3-glucan, a major component of the fungal cell wall
5-uorouracil (5-FU) inside the fungal cell, which with DNA and RNA synthesis
Mechanism of resistance
• Mutations in genes involved in ergosterol synthesis or uptake
• Overexpression of drug efux pumps, which can transport polyene drugs out of the fungal cell
• Changes in the cell membrane composition that reduce the binding afnity of polyene drugs
• Mutations can reduce the binding afnity of azole drugs to the enzyme or lead to overexpression of the enzyme, both of which can make the fungus resistant to treatment
• Overexpression of drug efux pumps
• Mutations in genes involved in ergosterol synthesis or uptake
• Mutations in genes involved in the cell wall stress response
• Mutation in the FKS1 gene, leading to reduced binding afnity of echinocandin drugs to the enzyme or lead to overexpression of the enzyme
• Mutations in genes involved in β-1,3-glucan synthesis or uptake
• Mutations in genes involved in the cell wall stress response
• Mutation in gene encoding for cytosine permease which uptakes ucytosine into the fungal cell
• Mutations in genes that encode enzymes, cytosine deaminase, which is involved in the conversion of ucytosine to 5-FU
A. Kumar etal.
(c) CDR1: A novel mutation (D709E) was found in the CDR1 gene of C. auris,
which encodes for an ABC efux pump, and contribute to polyene resistance (Reslan etal. 2022).
(d) MEC3: A mutation in MEC3, a gene mainly known for its role in DNA damage
homeostasis, has been shown to further increase the polyene MIC (Carolus etal. 2021).
It is to be noted that while these genes have been associated with polyene resistance in C. auris, the exact mechanisms of resistance are complex and not fully under­stood. Resistance can also vary between different strains of C. auris.
Flucytosine is another antifungal drug that works by inhibiting the synthesis of
DNA and RNA in fungal cells (Bellmann and Smuszkiewicz 2017). It is taken up into the cell by the cytosine permease, after which by the action of cytosine
8 Unravelling Drug Resistance in Candida Species: Genetic, Biolm…
deaminase (which is a fungal specic enzyme and not found in mammalian of bac­terial cells) (Edlind and Katiyar 2010), the drug is converted to its active form, 5- uorouracil (5-FU). 5-FU gets into a competition with uracil to get incorporated into the RNA strand during transcription, which results in blocking the RNA syn­thesis machinery and ultimately impairs protein synthesis inside the fungal cell (Houst etal. 2020). In addition to this, DNA synthesis can also be halted as 5-FU gets converted to uoro-deoxyuridylic acid thereby inhibiting thymidylate synthase, causing DNA damage (Houst etal. 2020). However, some Candida species can develop resistance to ucytosine, either by reducing the drug uptake or by altering the target enzymes. This can limit the effectiveness of ucytosine in treating fungal infections, especially when used alone. This is the prime reason why ucytosine as a monotherapy is not advised in the case of Candida species (Malani and Kauffman 2007).
Flucytosine primary resistance is common in Candid aglabrata, Candida krusei,
and Candida guilliermondii and is also found in some strains of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida parapsilosis (Cuenca-Estrella etal. 2001). These strains may have mutations in the genes encoding cytosine deaminase, uracil phos­phoribosyltransferase or uracil permease, which are involved in the activation and transport of ucytosine into the fungal cell. Flucytosine is usually combined with other antifungal agents, such as amphotericin B or azoles, as means to enhance its efcacy and prevent resistance development against ucytosine. However, some ucytosine-resistant strains of Candida have also shown cross-resistance to azoles, limiting their use in chronic clinical conditions (Noel etal. 2003).
Understanding the molecular pathways and mechanisms involved in fungal
pathogenesis can reveal new drug targets. Investigating specic enzymes, receptors, or regulatory proteins that play crucial roles in the fungal life cycle may provide opportunities for targeted drug development. This includes targeting processes involved in cell wall biosynthesis, signal transduction, and essential metabolic path­ways. Research efforts should focus on the discovery and development of novel antifungal compounds with unique mechanisms of action. Screening natural sources, chemical libraries, and employing advanced computational methods can aid in identifying compounds that are effective against drug-resistant fungal strains. Combining existing antifungal drugs with other compounds or therapies can create synergistic effects, enhancing overall efcacy and reducing the likelihood of resis­tance development. This approach may involve combination drug therapies, immu­nomodulation, or the use of adjuvants that potentiate the antifungal activity of existing drugs.
211
8.3 Contribution ofLipids inDrug Resistance
inCandida Species
While antifungal agents serve as the primary treatment for Candida infections, their efcacy is constrained by the rising prevalence of resistance in Candida species. This resistance can arise from a complex interplay of intrinsic and acquired factors,
212
A. Kumar etal.
encompassing variations in target enzymes, heightened expression or activation of efux pumps, and alterations in membrane composition or permeability. Signicantly, the role of lipids is pivotal in determining the susceptibility or resis­tance of Candida species to various types of antifungal treatments (Spampinato and Leonardi 2013; Turner and Butler 2014). Lipids play a crucial role in biological membranes by inuencing various aspects of their structure and function. These include uidity, asymmetry, permeability, and interaction with proteins. Moreover, lipids are involved in signalling pathways and metabolic processes that regulate cell growth, differentiation, stress response, and adaptation. Different classes of lipids exist, such as phospholipids, sterols, sphingolipids, and glycolipids. Each class comprises distinct subtypes with unique chemical and physical properties. The diverse lipid composition and metabolism found in Candida species reect their remarkable ability to adapt to different environmental conditions and host niches (Arendrup and Patterson 2017).
The main classes of antifungals used to treat Candida infections include poly-
enes, azoles, echinocandins, and ucytosine. Each class operates differently, and targets are specic within the fungal cell. The susceptibility and resistance of Candida species to these antifungal classes can be inuenced by various lipid­related mechanisms. Polyenes have the amazing ability to bind to ergosterol, one of the main components found in fungal membranes, and effectively create pores that disrupt the membrane’s integrity and function. However, resistance to its effects can arise from a decrease in ergosterol levels or alterations in its structure within the membrane, which can be attributed to mutations or overexpression of genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis, like ERG1, ERG3, ERG6, ERG11, or ERG25. On the other hand, resistance can also stem from heightened membrane uidity or asym­metry that hinders the binding or insertion of polyenes (Fig.8.3). This can be caused by changes in the distribution or composition of phospholipids or sphingolipids within the membrane. Azoles act by inhibiting the activity of Erg11p; this results in the build-up of harmful sterol by-products and a decrease in the amount of ergos­terol present in the fungal membrane. Changes in the composition or permeability
Fig. 8.3 ERG3 mutation substitutes the ergosterolin membrane with alternative non-toxic sterols
8 Unravelling Drug Resistance in Candida Species: Genetic, Biolm…
213
of the membrane caused by mutations can also impact the uptake and retention of azoles within the cell. Furthermore, the key role of ABC transporter proteins such as CaCdr1p in developing drug resistance is well-established. These transporters have a preference for lipid raft microdomains in the membrane, where they interact strongly with components like sphingolipids and ergosterol. When these raft com­ponents are altered, this can directly inuence the susceptibility of C. albicans to antifungal drugs. Specically, changes in these components can impact the localiza­tion of these transporter proteins, ultimately affecting the effectiveness of treatment (Pasrija etal. 2005, 2008; Mukhopadhyay etal. 2004).
The lipid composition of Candida species varies depending on their species,
strain, growth phase, and environmental conditions. Lipids have emerged as one of the critical contributors in the acquisition of multidrug resistance (MDR) in Candida. Interestingly, the comparative lipidomics of Candida species revealed that there is no typical lipid marker which separates them, rather each Candida strain has a typi­cal lipid imprint (Prasad and Singh 2013). A detailed lipidomic study of human pathogenic fungi C. auris revealed that it contains 5 major lipid groups: phospho­glycerolipids (PGLs), sphingolipids (SLs), sterols, diacylglycerols (DAGs), and triacylglycerols (TAGs), along with their molecular lipid species, and were able to identify 582 different lipid species belonging to the ve major lipid group men­tioned above (Shahi etal. 2020). Using lipidomics, they were also able to elucidate the difference in the lipid composition of an azole susceptible and an azole-resistant C. auris strain, gaining some crucial insights into the role of various lipid species in azole drug resistance of C. auris. Some of the notable differences were the molecu­lar lipid imprint of PGLs, which shows a stark difference between the azole suscep­tible and resistant strain, in addition to, azole-resistant strain showing elevated levels of polar lipids. Also, the azole-resistant clinical strain was reported to have a higher unsaturation index and free ergosterol (both ergostatetranol and ergosterol) content, when in comparison with the azole susceptible strain (Shahi etal. 2020).
To sum up lipids play an inevitable role, in determining the susceptibility and resis-
tance of Candida species to types of antifungal treatments. They can inuence aspects of membrane structure and function ultimately impacting how antifungals work and where they target. Lipids also are involved in signalling pathways and metabolic pro­cesses that regulate the expression or activity of enzymes and transporters related to resistance. Therefore, gaining an understanding of lipidomics in Candida species and their interactions with antifungals can offer insights into the mechanisms behind anti­fungal resistance. This knowledge can pave the way for strategies or approaches to combat resistance by developing antifungal agents or methods.
8.4 Role ofEfflux Pumps inDrug Resistance
In drug-resistant human fungal pathogens, efux pump upregulation contributes sig­nicantly to their resistance. Nevertheless, various groups of transporters play a piv­otal role in mitigating antifungal effects by actively participating in drug efux from the cellular interior (Shapiro etal. 2011). While diverse transporter groups exist in the
214
A. Kumar etal.
cell membrane of Candida species. The efux of drugs by the transporters is inu­enced by two primary factors: the upregulation of efux pump expression and height­ened transporter activity (Bachmann etal. 2002). Under drug treatment conditions, these transporters become activated, actively expelling drugs, aiding the fungus in managing toxicity and adapting to therapeutic challenges (Albertson etal. 1996). In Candida isolates resistant to azoles, a prevalent trend is the increased expression of genes related to drug efux pumps, originating primarily from two major superfami­lies: ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and major facilitator superfamily (MFS) (Schubert etal. 2011). These efux pumps play a pivotal role in expelling drugs, reducing the intracellular concentration of uconazole and thereby contributing to infection persis­tence (Albertson et al. 1996). Both ABC (ATP-binding cassette) and MFS (major facilitator superfamily) efux pumps are crucial contributors to multidrug resistance (MDR) in yeast (Albertson etal. 1996; Holmes etal. 2016). ABC efux pump pro­teins employ energy from the hydrolysis of ATP to drive the efux of drugs (Schubert etal. 2011). In the context of azole resistance, the MFS class is also implicated, as it relies on the proton motive force to expel substrates from the fungal cell membrane. ABC superfamily transporters are primary active transporters, while MFS is a second­ary carrier transporter. The ABC group of transporters, notably CDR1, CDR2, and SNQ2, actively plays a crucial role in azole drug resistance (Fig.8.4) (Mukherjee etal.
2003; Ramage 2002). Various drug efux pumps, such as PDR5 (pleiotropic drug
resistance), SNQ2 (sensitivity to 4- nitroquinoline N-oxide), and YOR1 (yeast oligo­mycin resistance), among other Candida species, as well play important role in drug resistance (Harris etal. 2021; Oliveira etal. 2001).
Fig. 8.4 Efux pumps play a crucial role in expelling drugs, leading to a decrease in intracellular drug concentration and consequently contributing to the persistence of infections. Multidrug resis­tance (MDR) in Candida is signicantly inuenced by both ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and major facilitator superfamily (MFS) efux pumps. (a) Elevated expression of drug transporters, governs resistance to azole drugs in Candida species. (b) ABC transporters (CDR1 and CDR2) and MFS transporters (MDR1) play key roles in intracellular-drug efux across the cell membrane
8 Unravelling Drug Resistance in Candida Species: Genetic, Biolm…
215
8.4.1 ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters
The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily is renowned for its role in facilitating the import and export of ions and molecules in bacteria. However, their signicance as drug transporters is now rmly established, extending even to eukaryotes (Cannon etal. 2009). The diverse range of xenobiotic compounds that the ABC family can export contributes signicantly to clinical resistance against Candida species. In Candida species, the upregulation of the ABC efux pump is a pivotal factor in the development of drug resistance, particularly evident with the azole class of antifun­gals (Bauer etal. 1999). These transporters typically consist of two transmembrane domains (TMD) and two nucleotide-binding domains (NBD), which are essential features of the ABC group. The NBD domains play a crucial role in facilitating substrate movement across the membrane through ATP hydrolysis (Decottignies and Goffeau 1997; Sipos and Kuchler 2006).
The well-characterized ABC proteins in Candida albicans, including Cdr1p,
Cdr2p, Cdr3p, and Cdr4p, have garnered attention due to their roles as drug trans­porters (Sanglard etal. 1995). Cdr1 and Cdr2 deletion strains of C. albicans exhib­ited higher accumulation of uconazole compared to the wild-type host, establishing a direct connection between uconazole accumulation and efux mediated by these transporters. Overexpression of CaCDR1 and CaCDR2 is commonly observed in azole-resistant clinical isolates of C. albicans, in oral, systemic, and vaginal con­texts alongside, higher expression of CaFLU1 and CaPDR16 has been observed in azole-resistant isolates (Schubert etal. 2011; Ramage 2002; Cannon etal. 2009).
C. auris exhibits numerous ABC and MFS orthologs of transporter genes, like
Candida albicans (Chowdhary etal. 2017). Phylogenetic studies have conrmed
the presence of homologs for Snq2, Mdr1, Cdr1/Cdr2, and Cdr4 in C. auris (Morschhäuser etal. 2007). The relationship between efux pump transporters and azole drug resistance in C. auris is of paramount importance. Azole-resistant clini­cal isolates indicate an elevated expression of Cdr1 drug pumps in C. auris and its deletion results in an eightfold increase in susceptibility to azole in C. auris (Adams etal. 2018; Chowdhary etal. 2017; Horton and Nett 2020).
The CaCDR1 and CaCDR2 are under the regulation of the transcription factor
CaTac1p, while the regulation of CaMDR1 is mediated by the transcription factor CaMrr1p (Harris etal. 2021; Bhattacharya et al. 2020). Both transcription factors Tac1 and Mrr1 belong to the zinc-cluster transcription factors (Zn2-Cys6) (Dunkel et al. 2008a; Liu et al. 2018). Mutant strains in tac1, characterized by gain-of­function mutations, result in the constitutive overexpression of CDR1 and CDR2 (Coste etal. 2006). Similarly, activating mutations in MRR1 leads to an upregula­tion of MDR1 (Dunkel etal. 2008b). In particular, resistance in clinical isolates has been associated with various gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in CaTAC1, such as T225A, V736A, N972D, N977D, G980E, and G980W, and in CaMRR1, including P683S and P683H (Dunkel etal. 2008a; Coste etal. 2006).
The impact of gain-of-function mutations extends to the homologs of Tac1b and
Mrr1a in C. auris, providing uconazole resistance. For example, an extensive study involving 304 clinical isolates of C. auris worldwide, each representing one
216
A. Kumar etal.
of the four major genetic clades, identied three common TAC1b mutations: A640V in clade Ic, A657V in clade Ib, and F862_N866del substitutions in clade IV (Rybak etal. 2019). These mutations in TAC1b were found to signicantly contribute to azole resistance across various clades, as demonstrated by another TAC1b mutation (encoding S611P) associated with improved uconazole resistance in clade-IV clin­ical isolates (Li etal. 2021). This evidence underscores the role of TAC1 mutations in fostering resistance to azoles across diverse clinical strains.
In C. glabrata, the primary mechanism driving resistance to azole involves the
upregulation of ABC transporters, specically CDR1, CDR2, SNQ2, and PDH1 (Tsai etal. 2006). Additionally, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in the transcrip­tion factor CgPdr1 (pleiotropic drug resistance) induce the expression of CgCDR1, CgCDR2, Cg SNQ2, and Cg PDH1 (Ferrari etal. 2009). These GOFs encompassing D261G, L280F, R293I, S316I, L328F, LS343F, R376G, G583S, Y584C, T588A, R592S, T607S, N691D, D876Y, D1082G, and E1083Q (Ferrari etal. 2009). These GOFs are crucial in elevating resistance to uconazole (Ferrari et al. 2009). Moreover, the increased expression of the efux pump also exhibits a correlation with heightened azole resistance in C. parapsilosis and C. dubliniensis (Silva etal. 2012).
Fluconazole tolerance is also linked to the overexpression of MDR1in C. albi-
cans, where activating single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Mrr1 results in azole resistance (Liu and Myers 2017). While Flr1 shares homology with C. albi- cans CDR1, it has not demonstrated a signicant role in azole resistance (Chen etal.
2007). These ndings underscore the diverse molecular mechanisms at play in the
regulation of drug resistance, shedding light on the intricate interplay of transcrip­tional activators, genetic mutations, and transporter expression.
Efux transporters have also been studied in C. auris biolms, revealing their
contribution to biolm-mediated resistance (Horton and Nett 2020). Several tran­scriptional factors, including Tac1, and Mrr1, and their activation and constitutive expression networks, play a crucial role in regulating the efux mechanism under different drug treatment conditions (Dunkel etal. 2008b). These mechanisms con­tribute to drug resistance in clinical isolates of C. auris strains (Adams etal. 2018).
The role of mitochondria in efux pump-mediated azole resistance in C. gla-
brata is noteworthy. There are many mitochondrial membrane-localized proteins such as ABC and Atm1 protein in iron homeostasis as well (Kispal etal. 1997). The mitochondrial system indirectly regulates the calcium signalling and pleiotropic drug resistance pathway thus, results in azole resistance, aligning with the upregula­tion of genes such as CgCDR1, CgPDH1, and others (Brown et al. 2014; Sun etal. 2019).
Notably, even petite yeast strains, characterized by mitochondrial functional
abnormalities, exhibit upregulated ABC transporters. This adaptive response enhances their tness and amplies resistance to azoles in C. glabrata (Ferrari etal. 2009).
ABC transporters in fungus possess distinct domains dedicated to interacting
with the membrane as well as ATP binding and hydrolysis (Higgins 2001). These transporters exhibit remarkable promiscuity, binding to various substrates within
8 Unravelling Drug Resistance in Candida Species: Genetic, Biolm…
217
the expansive binding pocket, albeit with different binding residues (Prasad etal.
2015). This study has suggested that the ABC pumps have the presence of at least
three drug-binding sites in these transporters (Golin etal. 2003). The constitutive expression of these transporters also plays a crucial role in shaping the drug resis­tance pattern (Prasad etal. 2006). Overall, these ndings highlight the importance of understanding the molecular mechanisms involving ABC transporters in Candida species to address and combat antifungal resistance effectively.
Previously, there was limited understanding regarding the expression of efux
pumps in the context of echinocandins and polyenes. The uncertainty stemmed from the fact that these drugs primarily act on the outer surface of the plasma mem­brane, and it was unclear whether efux transporters regulated them, given their large size and hydrophobic nature (Cannon etal. 2009; Perfect 2017; Robbins etal.
2016). The speculation arose due to the unsuitability of these drugs to bind in the
transporter’s binding pocket. However, recent reports have shed light on the poten­tial involvement of efux pumps in the case of Amphotericin B (Cannon etal.
2009). It has been conrmed that there are few non-synonymous mutations in the
putative membrane transporters of C. auris clinical isolates. Nevertheless, a com­prehensive study is required to elucidate how these mutations contribute to clinical isolates gaining drug resistance through efux pump mechanisms (Escandón etal. 2019).
8.4.2 Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) Transporter
The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) represents one of the two most extensive groups of membrane transporters found across various domains of life, encompass­ing bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes (Pao etal. 1998). MFS transporters, classied as secondary active transporters, are recognized for their role in exporting a diverse range of substrates (Decottignies and Goffeau 1997). These include organic and inorganic ions, drugs, metabolites, neurotransmitters, nucleosides, amino acids, and various intermediates, functioning as uniporters, symporters, or antiporters (Pao etal. 1998). The MFS superfamily stands out as the largest family of secondary active membrane carriers, and its transporters exhibit a remarkable diversity in their capabilities to transport various substrates (Decottignies and Goffeau 1997; Pao etal. 1998). These substrates range from small molecules, encompassing organic and inorganic ions, to more complex biomolecules like peptides and lipid compo­nents. Within the MFS superfamily, certain members of the drug/H+ antiporter fam­ily function as multidrug transporters, utilizing proton-driven downhill transport to expel their respective substrates (Calabrese etal. 2000).
Typically, MFS transporter proteins consist of 12 or 14 putative transmembrane
segments (TMS), with lengths varying between 400 and 600 amino acids (Saier
1998, 1999). These single-polypeptide secondary carriers transport small solutes by
responding to chemiosmotic ion gradients (Cannon etal. 2009). Members of the MFS superfamily are ubiquitous in all domains of life, holding direct therapeutic and pharmacological signicance. They exhibit specicity for a wide array of
218
A. Kumar etal.
substances, including sugars, polyols, drugs, neurotransmitters, metabolites, phos­phorylated glycolytic intermediates, and amino acids.
While the MFS superfamily is widespread, only a limited subset of MFS trans-
porters, such as MDR1, FLU1, NAG3, NAG4, JEN1, ARN1, and NGT1, have been identied and studied in C. albicans thus far (Pasrija etal. 2007; Sengupta and Datta 2003).
The MFS family transporters MDR1 and FLU1 are recognized for their role in
exporting antifungal compounds. Notably, MDR1, belonging to the DHA1 MFS transporter group, has been implicated in conferring resistance to uconazole and ketoconazole (Pasrija etal. 2007). Upregulation of MDR1 in C. albicans has also been associated with resistance to brefeldin A and cerulenin. Structural and func­tional analyses of MDR1 have highlighted a critical region, TMS5, responsible for drug/H+ trafcking (Calabrese etal. 2000).
Among the C. albicans MFS, MDR1 and its alleles are identied as the sole drug
efux pump transporters.MDR1 was initially found to confer resistance against the tubulin-binding drug benomyl and the tetrahydrofolate reductase inhibitor metho­trexate (Becker et al. 1995; Gupta et al. 1998). MDR1 overexpression has been linked to azole resistance in C. albicans. Expression of MDR1 in S. cerevisiae imparts resistance to various unrelated compounds. Notably, methotrexate, beno­myl, and several unrelated drugs induce increased expression of MDR1 in C. albi-
cans cells, with some azole-resistant clinical isolates demonstrating heightened MDR1 expression (Ben-Yaacov etal. 1994; Fling etal. 1991).
FLU1, another DHA1 MFS gene in C. albicans, functions as a transporter, as
evidenced by increased susceptibility to mycophenolic acid upon FLU1 deletion. In a study generating 21 itraconazole-resistant mutants through mutagenesis, approxi­mately 50% of these mutants exhibited resistance due to the overexpression of MDR3, a DHA2 family MFS-type transporter (Anon etal. 2018).
The Drug: H+ Antiporter-1 (DHA1) family comprises members that include
MDR and drug-specic efux pumps, widely distributed across various organisms. Subsequent research uncovered its role in resistance to benzotriazoles, cyclohexi­mide, and sulfometuron methyl (Ben-Yaacov et al. 1994; Goldway et al. 1995). Disruption of the MDR1 gene decreased the pathogenicity of C. albicans (Morschhäuser etal. 2007). The Drug: H+ Antiporter-2 (DHA2) family of drug: H+ antiporters in C. albicans consists of nine members sharing signicant sequence similarity with other transport proteins. These DHA2 proteins, particularly ATR1, have been associated with conferring resistance to structurally dissimilar chemicals like aminotriazole and 4-nitroquinolone-N-oxide (Gömpel-Klein and Brendel 1990; Kanazawa etal. 1988). Additionally, SGE1 is connected to resistance against ethid­ium bromide and crystal violet (Amakasu etal. 1993; Goffeau etal. 1997). While no member of the DHA2 family has been identied in C. albicans, insights from the study of SGE1 and ATR1in S. cerevisiae provide valuable information about poten- tial functions and roles within this family (Kanazawa et al. 1988; Amakasu etal. 1993).
Additionally, other members of the DHA1 family in C. albicans, such as NAG4,
NAG3, and, FLU1, have been identied. The disruption of FLU1 leads to
8 Unravelling Drug Resistance in Candida Species: Genetic, Biolm…
219
mycophenolic acid hypersensitivity, indicating that this substance may be the suit­able substrate for the drug transporter (Calabrese et al. 2000). Whereas, NAG3 (TMP1) and NAG4 (TMP2) exhibit sensitivity to various compounds, including cycloheximide and show upregulation specically (Sengupta and Datta 2003). Furthermore, their expression increases in response to these drugs, indicating their potential role as diverse drug efux pumps. While FLU1, NAG3, and NAG4 are members of the DHA1 family, none, except MDR1, has been specically linked to MDR in C. albicans, making MDR1 a clinically signicant efux pump protein (Silva etal. 2009). Among the MFS transporters, Mdr1 is extensively identied and stands out as a signicant multidrug transporter, particularly playing a crucial role in clinical azole resistance within the DHA1 family (Kohli etal. 2001). The overex­pression of MDR1 is frequently observed in azole-resistant clinical isolates, and it is closely linked with the development of drug resistance (Pasrija etal. 2007). Among all DHA1 family members, MDR1 is notably the most signicant in terms of its impact on clinical azole resistance (Gaur etal. 2008).
The upregulation of MDR1 is controlled by various transcription factors interact-
ing with the gene’s promoters. Transcription factors such as Cph1, Mrr1, Upc2, and Mcm1 play a crucial role in this process, contributing to the upregulation of Mdr1 proteins in clinically resistant Candida strains (Sasse et al. 2011). These factors exert both positive and negative regulation, with Cph1 and Cap1 demonstrating negative regulation, while Mrr1, Upc2, and Mcm1 exert positive regulatory effects (Schubert etal. 2011). MRR1 (multidrug resistance regulator 1) plays a signicant role in regulating the expression of MDR1. In C. albicans, it exhibits resistance to uconazole (Dunkel etal. 2008a). Notably, a gain-of-function (GOF) mutation in Mrr1 is associated with increased MDR1 expression (Dunkel et al. 2008a; Morschhäuser etal. 2007). These mutant variants can activate MDR1 expression even in drug-sensitive clinical isolates. Additionally, Upc2 mutant variants are also capable of triggering MDR1 upregulation (Schubert etal. 2011).
The targeting drug efux pumps in Candida species present a promising avenue
for combatting fungal infections and overcoming drug resistance challenges. Exploring and harnessing drug efux pump mechanism for therapeutic interven­tions can lead to novel strategies with potential clinical impact. The development of specic and potent inhibitors targeting the drug efux pumps in Candida by design­ing compounds that selectively block or modulate the activity of these pumps could enhance the efcacy of existing antifungal drugs. This approach would not only overcome resistance mediated by efux pumps but also potentiate the action of conventional antifungal agents, offering a dual benet in the treatment of Candida infections.