Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5219_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
9 Biolm Formation inCandida Species
241
and hospital-acquired infections is increasing daily. While Candida is a commensal in humans, it can transition to a pathogenic phase, especially when an individual is immunocompromised or when the environment is made conducive for Candida proliferation, and biolm formation is one of the mechanisms enabling these cells to survive (Mba and Nweze 2020b).
Various Candida species can cause challenging infections, with Candida albi-
cans being the most prevalent and implicated, followed by Candida glabrata (Mba and Nweze 2020a, b; Macias-Paz etal. 2023). Candida tropicalis is mostly involved in urinary tract infections (Rho etal. 2004). On the other hand, Candida parapsilo- sis is more prevalent in the skin of healthy hosts, leading to catheter-related infec­tions (Yamin et al. 2021; Branco et al. 2023). Each Candida species behaves differently in their capacity to form a biolm, which largely inuences their mor­phology. Differences in their extracellular matrix (ECM) production and character­istics also signicantly inuence antifungal resistance patterns (Seneviratne etal.
2008). Despite biolm formation being a common virulence phenotype, the pro-
cesses and factors controlling each step differ from species to species. The nature of the surface, host niche, and strain-specic factors inuence it. For instance, mature biolms of C. albicans have a heterogeneous architecture. The blastophores and hyphae are also surrounded by an ECM (Chandra etal. 2001). The ECM functions as a structural scaffold. It is involved in adhesion, helping the cell to form a barrier that offers protection against the surrounding environment (Mitchell etal. 2016).
In contrast, C. glabrata biolms consist exclusively of yeast-form cells. These
cells are arranged, stacked together in a layer form, and tightly clustered (Silva etal.
2009; Rodrigues etal. 2017; Hassan etal. 2021; Malinovská etal. 2023). Biolms
formed by C. tropicalis display yeast, hyphae, and pseudohyphae morphotypes with well-pronounced hyphal budding (Bizerra etal. 2008). Moreover, in C. parapsilo- sis, the biolm comprises yeast cell clusters attached to surfaces, having reduced ECM (Lattif etal. 2010; Malinovská etal. 2023). These differences underscore the complex processes of biolm formation and the challenge of devising a universal approach to eradicate Candida infections due to biolm formation. Candida bio­lms are predominantly found in mucosal or endothelial environments, playing a critical role in candidiasis. Notably, biolm-associated infections complicate treat­ment, and implant replacement is unavoidable in most cases. Recently, it has been estimated that pathogenic biolms are associated with over 80% of all infections (Schulze etal. 2021; Malinovská etal. 2023). The inherent resilience of microbes within biolms intensies the difculty in eliminating most infections. Biolm also signicantly contributes to resistance against antifungal agents (Szekely et al.
2023). These challenges make the treatment of Candida infections progressively
more difcult (Barantsevich and Barantsevich 2022).
Therefore, gaining a thorough understanding of biolm formation in Candida
species is crucial for delineating the factors controlling the process. Developing means to curtail infections resulting from this virulence phenotype is also impor­tant. This chapter focuses on Candida biolms to comprehensively understand the processes leading to biolm formation and dispersal. This chapter also provided insight into the mechanisms, transcriptional proteins, and genes controlling biolm
242
Proliferaon
matrix
M. I. Elibe and N. E. Innocent
formation. It also delves into the variations in biolm formation among the Candida species, while critically discussing biolm regulation. Moreover, how biolm for­mation contributes to antifungal resistance, especially in mixed-species biolms, was also discussed.
9.2 Biofilm Formation Process inCandida Species
The major Candida spp. that cause infections include C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. auris, and C. krusei (Malinovská etal. 2023). The
intricate process of biolm formation in all the different species is not completely well documented, except in C. albicans, which is the major Candida species caus­ing diverse infections and posing therapeutic challenges (Atriwal etal. 2021; Ponde etal. 2021). Typically, in the initiation stage of biolm formation, the yeast cells attach to a specic surface, resulting in distinct colony formation (Fig. 9.1).
1
Aachment (adherence)
Planktonic cells
Biofilm
formaon
4
Dispersal of biofilm
cells
3
Maturaon (formaon of extracellular
Fig. 9.1 Biolm formation process in Candida species
Bioc and abioc surfaces
2
9 Biolm Formation inCandida Species
243
Thereafter, the cells organize themselves and initiate the production and secretion of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). The extracellular vesicles play a signi­cant role in Candida (Karkowska-Kuleta etal. 2023). EPS facilitates the develop­ment of a structure, culminating in the recognizable biolm during the maturation phase. Even after forming a mature biolm, there is the potential for disseminating progeny biolm cells. During the process, the cells detach from their initial position and migrate to other locations where they can establish new biolm (Lohse etal.
2018). Interestingly, all these processes are controlled by different factors.
In C. albicans, the initiation stage usually takes about 11h, during which there
are distinct colonies of microcolonies formation. The next phase is characterized by EPS production. This is followed by bilayer formation. The bilayer is composed of yeast, germ tubes, and/or young hyphae. Maturation of biolms entails the progres­sion of a substantial extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) layer housing yeasts and hyphae, constructing a compact interconnected structure within approximately 38–72h. Subsequent to maturation, the dispersal phase ensues. In this stage, fully developed biolms release offspring cells through budding, transforming into non­adherent yeast cells available for colonization or causing infection, as indicated by Cámara etal. (2022). Notably, most researches on biolm formation have been car­ried out under controlled laboratory conditions (in vitro). An informative invivo investigation by Andes etal. (2004) observed the evolution of C. albicans biolm within a central venous catheter in rats. This study’s ndings highlighted notable distinctions compared to experiments conducted in articial environments (in vitro). For instance, the early phase of invivo biolm formation was shorter, with several layers of yeast cells and hyphae present after 8h. In contrast, invitro maturation took 38–72h. In the case of C. glabrata, matured biolm was seen after 48h in catheters in a rat subcutaneous model. There were also differences in early-phase development and cell attachment dependence on the catheter. Zuo et al. (2021) reported that C. parapsilosis had the highest biolm-forming ability among all Candida species, while C. glabrata had the least. It was also noted that non-albicans spp., including C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata, had a higher adhesion ability in catheter-related candidemia. This evidence highlights the increasing role of non­albicans in clinical infections (Govrins and Lass-Flörl 2023).
Generally, adhesion is the initial and crucial stage of biolm formation. Adhesion
is facilitated by adhesins (proteins associated with cell walls). These adhesins facili­tate binding to epithelial cells or nonliving surfaces. The adhesins attach to amino acids or sugar residues (Gulati and Nobile 2016). Typically, adhesins belong to the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-cell wall proteins. This protein consists of a GPI anchor and different domains enhancing attachment to carbohydrates or peptides (Verstrepen and Klis 2006; Kumari etal. 2021). In C. albicans and other Candida spp., there are the agglutinin-like sequence proteins (Als). The Als is a subset of the GPI_CWP family. This family comprises several adhesins playing diverse roles in biolm formation. For example, deletion of Als3 results in a signicant loss of biolm- forming ability (Nobile etal. 2006). Similar ALS-like proteins are found in other Candida species. For example, similar Als have been reported in Candida spp. such as C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. lusitaniae, C. dubliniensis, and C.
244
M. I. Elibe and N. E. Innocent
guilliermondii (de Groot etal. 2013; Malinovská etal. 2023), though their specic roles remain largely unknown. Another signicant adhesin family in albicans is the hyphal wall protein (Hwp). Like Als, there are different members of Hwp, each playing a different or multiple roles in biolm formation. For example, Hwp1, a mannoprotein, contributes to biolm formation, as a study by Modrezewka and Kurnatowski (2015) reported. Other members of the Hwp family (Ywp1, Rbt1, Hwp2, and Eap1) are also essential for biolm development (de Groot etal. 2013). In C. glabrata, several adhesins, including Awp14, have been reported to be involved in biolm formation (Fernández-Pereira etal. 2021). Additionally, in C. parapsilo- sis, increased expression of adhesins results in higher biolm formation (Moreno­Martínez etal. 2021).
Following adhesion, regulated by numerous genes and transcriptional factors,
biolm development progresses through morphological changes. At this stage, there is an increase in the number of cell numbers. This stage is followed by ECM pro­duction. A study on biolm formation and ECM production in C. albicans, C. gla- brata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis from various sources reveals species-specic differences in biolm formation (Estivill etal. 2011; Cavalheiro and Teixeira 2018). C. albicans biolms, for example, demonstrate greater conuence than those of other Candida species. It displays various morphologies in infected tissues. Some of the morphologies include budding and septate hyphae. There was also pseudohy­phae formation. On plastic coverslips, C. albicans biolms exhibit a dense network of yeasts and lamentous cells enclosed in ECM (Ramage etal. 2002). In contrast, C. glabrata biolms, as mentioned earlier, feature an ECM rich in carbohydrates and proteins (Silva etal. 2009). Conversely, the biolm structure of C. parapsilosis, although variable among strains, typically includes pseudohyphae and yeast mor­photypes. They form stacked multilayer cell aggregates. The extracellular matrix produced by C. parapsilosis biolms is predominantly composed of carbohydrates with low protein composition (Silva etal. 2009). Despite C. tropicalis biolms hav­ing a matrix low in carbohydrate and protein content, they exhibit increased resis­tance to detachment from surfaces compared to biolms formed by C. albicans (Al-Fattani and Douglas 2006). In a study by Kuhn, most Candida species generally exhibit a high ability to form biolm, except C. tropicalis (Kuhn etal. 2002a). This early study suggests that certain cell lineages have more propensity to form biolm than others.
The biolm structural architecture relies on the production of ECM.The ECM
confers a gel-like structure to the biolm. ECM serves various functions, including defense against phagocytosis. They provide a scaffold for biolm integrity. This scaffold makes it difcult for drugs to penetrate. The production of ECM exhibits variation based on species and strain, nutrient availability, and medium ow rate.
C. tropicalis, for instance, is recognized for its higher ECM production compared to C. glabrata. In the study by Al-Fattani and Douglas (2006), an increased medium
ow rate was reported to enhance ECM production signicantly. Generally, the ECM of Candida biolms is primarily composed of polysaccharides, although the proportions may vary among species (Al-Fattani and Douglas 2006; Balducci etal.
2023). Major carbohydrates in C. tropicalis and C. albicans biolms include
9 Biolm Formation inCandida Species
245
glucose and hexosamine. Uronic acid, phosphorus, and proteins are also present in smaller amounts. Zarnowski etal. (2014) offered valuable insights into the C. albi- cans biolm matrix, identifying different macromolecular components and their contributions to the biolm.
In summary, a diverse array of architectures, adhesion properties, cellular mor-
phologies, and ECM compositions characterize Candida biolms. These character­istics are not only specic to each species. In some instances, it also depends on the strain. Additionally, external factors in the biolm’s surrounding environment play a crucial role in shaping the nal biolm produced (Toyofuku etal. 2016; Yin etal.
2019; Mirghani etal. 2022).
9.3 Regulation ofBiofilm Formation inCandida Species
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and C. albicans diverged over a million years ago. However, over the years, S. cerevisiae has been well-studied, with several studies shedding light on its genetic and genomic composition. Among all the Candida spe­cies, C. albicans is the most studied. However, there is less information on its genetic manipulation as compared to S. cerevisiae. C. albicans face challenges in genetic tractability due to complexities in its parasexual cycle, especially under laboratory conditions (Mba etal. 2022). Despite these constraints, several emerging tools have helped to genetically manipulate C. albicans, providing a wealth of infor­mation on its biology and genomic composition. So far, recombinant DNA tech­nologies and whole genome sequencing platforms have been pivotal in deciphering the complexity of biolm formation in pathogenic fungi. About 1000 gene knockout mutants have been successfully created. This value is out of approximately 6000 total genes. This has enabled screening and identifying different biolm pheno­types, thus providing the foundation for uncovering genes and regulatory proteins involved in biolm formation. Moreover, proteomics and transcriptional proling have also been critical in uncovering proteins and genes involved in biolm forma­tion in pathogenic fungi. With all these available tools, it is now widely clear that about six complex transcriptional networks control the biolm development of C. albicans. They include Tec1, Bcr1, Efg1, Ndt80, Rob1, and Brg1. These genes are regulators and, as such, control a wide range of downstream genes. They directly bind to and likely regulate more than 1000 genes. Some of these target genes are extra-transcriptional regulators. The entire connection forms an interconnected net­work of genes involved in forming biolm.
Genes playing roles in biolm formation differ, and some play interwoven roles
or similar roles. While specic genes act as adhesins to control hyphae production, ECM production, and drug resistance, some genes play dual or multiple roles. Despite identifying numerous target genes in the biolm network, many of the genes remain unstudied and yet to be properly characterized. Based on orthology mapping, there is an evolutionary hint that C. albicans’ biolm-forming ability has evolved recently. This insight explains why C. albicans and their near neighbor are among the few fungal species capable of forming biolms within a human host.
246
M. I. Elibe and N. E. Innocent
Although there is incomplete insight into the mechanistic pathways controlling bio­lm, it is now relatively easy to investigate biolm formation in a wide range of cells and also study genes with nonregulatory functions and their roles in biolm formation. Besides the already described biolm master regulators, about 44 extra regulators have been uncovered and associated with biolm. These regulators, when deleted, affected the formation of biolms by Candida spp.
Interestingly, most of these additional regulators are linked with the master regu-
lator. This evidence suggests potential direct regulation by the core biolm circuit (Gulati and Nobile 2016; Rodriguez etal. 2020). While the transcriptional factors control biolm formation, it has also been shown that they also regulate pseudohy­phal growth. They are also associated with how cells respond to osmotic stress (Ni etal. 2009). Evidence is also available that they are pivotal in white-opaque cell­type switching in C. albicans (Hernday etal. 2013).
Most of the transcriptional factors are associated with hyphal formation, adhe-
sion, and ECM production. Identifying the intricate regulatory network underlying biolm formation holds great promise for identifying optimal targets to address Candida species’ biolm formation. Nobile etal. conducted a study that involved the construction of about 165 deletion mutants in C. albicans. These mutants were defective in biolm formation potential both invivo and invitro. Mutants defective in biolm were associated with bcr1, efg1, brg1, tec1, ndt80, and rob1. Using chro­matin immunoprecipitation-on-chip analysis, it was evident that there was a sub­stantial overlap in the mutual control of biolm and the target genes (Nobile etal.
2013). Efg1 and Cph1, two genes involved in biolm formation in C. albicans, also
play a role in lamentous growth. They play a more signicant role during hyphal differentiation. Notably, the two genes positively inuence the gene expression con­trolling hyphal growth. They inuence ECE1, ALS3, HWP1, and HYR1 (Hoyer etal. 1998; Maiti etal. 2015; Malinovská etal. 2023). Deletion mutants Δefg1 and Δefg1Δcph1 are unable to undergo lamentation or biolm development. The mutants form only a sparse monolayer of adherent elongated cells (Ramage etal. 2002).
Furthermore, the Ndt80in C. albicans is implicated in overseeing lamentous
growth, biolm formation, resistance to azole, cell separation, and virulence (Sellam etal. 2009, 2010). Similarly, Brg1 plays a role related to controlling genes related to the growth of hyphae in albicans (Cleary etal. 2012). Bcr1, a C2H2 zinc nger transcription regulator, is also a regulator of biolm. It plays a more prominent role during the adhesion phase. It inuences surface protein expression. This, in turn, controls the adhesion of cells during the early stages of the biolm process. When Bcr1 was knocked out in a rat catheter model, the Candida cell was unable to form a biolm after 48h. However, this condition was restored by the overexpression of ALS3 (Lane etal. 2001a, b). Tye7, Cst6, and Ace2 have also been associated with biolm formation in Candida spp. (Nobile et al. 2008; Cavalheiro and Teixeira
2018). Ace2 homologs in C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis are also signicantly
involved in the formation of biolm (Kamran etal. 2004). C. glabrata possesses specic transcriptional factors that regulate biolm formation. They employ sub­telomeric silencing to control gene expression. However, multiple genes and factors
9 Biolm Formation inCandida Species
247
are involved in biolm in C. glabrata, as noted in research carried out in different regions (Purohit and Gajjar 2022; Raj etal. 2022; Vázquez-Franco etal. 2022; Zhao etal. 2022; Huang et al. 2023). Moreover, autophagy has been documented as a regulator of biolm in Candida albicans (Liu etal. 2022). In addition, recent tran­script proling also revealed the role of PDB1, a pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, in the formation of biolm in C. albicans (Rai etal. 2023). Additional genes and transcriptional factors governing biolm formation in Candida species are detailed in Table9.1.
In conclusion, considering the multifaceted aspects of biolms, their regulatory
processes are intricately complex. It encompasses cell adhesion control, formation of hyphae, extracellular matrix production, dispersal, and various other stages. Identifying a universal regulator that governs biolm formation across all Candida species presents a formidable challenge. But such a universal regulator could be an excellent therapeutic target covering all the Candida spp.
Table 9.1 Genes and transcriptional factors involved in biolm formation (Wheeler etal. 2008; Homann etal. 2009; Finkel etal. 2012; Fox etal. 2015; Araújo etal. 2017; Cavalheiro and Teixeira
2018; Pokhrel etal. 2022; Gulati and Nobile 2016; Xu etal. 2022; McCall etal. 2019; Rodriguez
etal. 2020; Liu etal. 2022)
Gene name Description Als
Als1-7,9. Als1,3 and 5 Others include: Ecm33, Eap1, Msb2, Hwp1, Mp65, Pbr1, and Pga1,
Hwp Hwp1, Hwp2, and Rbt1, Try2-7
Brg1, Rob1, Tec1 and Ndt80 Facilitates hyphal formation Csh1, Adh5, Adh1, Xog1, Bgl2, Gca1, Gca2,
Gsc1, Phr1, and Ifd6, Rlm1 Rlm1 Positively regulate extracellular matrix
Zap1 Negatively regulate extracellular matrix
Nrg1, Pse1 Involved in increasing biolm dispersal
Ume6 Involved in the reduction of biolm
Hsp90, Hos2, Sif2, Pes1, Set3, Ywp1 and Snt1 Also involved in dispersal Bcr1 and Bcr1 Play a role in adhesion and lamentation
Flo8 Filamentation Rfx2, Zcf8,28,31,32,34,39, Ace2,Ada2,Ahr1,
Arg81,Rfg1, Efg1 Ume6, Nrg1 Filamentation and dispersal
Large cell surface glycoproteins involved in attachment Mostly involved in the attachment process
Required for adhesion, cell aggregation, and hyphal formation
Involved in extracellular matrix production
production.
production.
when overexpressed
dispersal when overexpressed
Regulate Hwp1 expression
Filamentation and adhesion
248
M. I. Elibe and N. E. Innocent
9.4 Multispecies Biofilm Between Candida Species
andOther Microbes
Most times, infections are conceptualized and addressed as if a singular microbe is operating independently. However, infections transpire within the context of the human microbiota. This encompasses a diverse array of microbes inhabiting the body. Understanding biolm formation and considering the presence of other microbial members within a niche are crucial. C. albicans is the most implicated pathogenic fungi, causing infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. However, various Candida spp. have been identied alongside C. albicans in poly­microbial biolms and coinfections. These species include C. dubliniensis, C. gla- brata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. guillermondii, C. krusei, and C. auris (Pathak etal. 2012; Ponde etal. 2021). Coinfection between Candida species and other Candida species (Silva etal. 2011; Yazdanpanah et al. 2023) and bacteria– Candida coinfection also pose more treatment difculty (Jenkinson and Douglas
2002; Fourie and Pohl 2019; Haiko etal. 2019; Salvatori etal. 2020). In vitro stud-
ies indicate that bacterial species and Candida spp. interact in diverse ways from various locations. These interactions inuence biolm formation. However, our understanding of how Candida spp. interacts both within themselves and together with other microbes is largely limited. A study by Witchley etal. (2019) showed that the morphogenesis of C. albicans inuences microbiota balance and composition, thus demonstrating how Candida spp. can inuence nearby microbial communities. A more recent study by Eichelberger and Cassat (2021) revealed the metabolic pat­terns during coinfection between C. albicans and S. aureus. According to the results, alterations in metabolism control the severity of infection during coinfection. There was an increase in the production of toxins in S. aureus, which plays a role in mor­phogenesis and cell wall modication in C. albicans. Additionally, polymicrobial biolms formed by C. albicans and S. aureus exhibit increased biomass and decreased susceptibility to antifungals compared to biolms produced by single cells. During coinfection, the metabolic processes triggered in S. aureus and C. albi- cans inuence their interactions with host immune cells, leading to enhanced micro­bial survival and evasion of the immune response.
So far, not much has been learned about dual-species biolms between C. albi-
cans and other microbes. Studies have explored such biolms, pairing C. albicans with bacteria frequently isolated from different human body. Some of these microbes secrete signaling molecules, directly or indirectly inuencing polymicrobial infec­tion. A recent study by Lueyar etal. (2023) provided a deep insight into Candida interaction with streptococcus species in oral biolm. The study suggests that
S. mutans and S. gordonii prompt the production of lamentous structures in C. albi­cans. The bacteria impact decreases the counts of C. albicans. The interaction
between S. mutants and C. albicans in biolm was also recently studied by Xiao etal. (2022). From the study, it was observed that interactions between different kingdoms inuence the initiation and production of biolms. It was also noted to inuence the dynamic expression of virulence genes in S. mutans and C. albicans. Pseudomonas aeruginosa produces a 12-carbon acyl homoserine lactone. This
9 Biolm Formation inCandida Species
compound controls the growth of hyphae in C. albicans (Lindsay and Hogan 2014). C. albicans biolms can also create a hypoxic microenvironment, thus supporting
anaerobic bacteria growth (Nobile and Johnson 2015). The interactions within diverse microbes in polymicrobial biolms and their implications for health are undeniably of considerable interest and signicance. Humans create a diverse microbial environment. The microbiome of humans includes members from differ­ent life forms (viruses, fungi, bacteria, and archaea). These different microbial forms maintain a symbiotic relationship, bringing about complexity within the eco­system. Genetic or environmental factors could disrupt the ecosystem, including changes in pH, shifts in immunity, the indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antimi­crobials, and changes in nutrient composition within a niche. Such disruption could lead to infections resulting from the overgrowth of certain lineages more adapted to environmental changes.
Candida albicans, a prevalent fungal pathogen, commonly engages in commen-
salism with bacteria. Establishing a clinical prognosis for polymicrobial interac­tions in individuals, especially in immunocompromised individuals, is challenging. This is due to their heightened vulnerability to other infections. This makes assess­ing the extent of these interactions and molecular mechanisms difcult. More study is therefore needed to understand the interaction between Candida biolm and other microbial pathogens.
249
9.5 Biofilm Formation, Persister Cells, andAntifungal
Resistance inCandida Species
The increasing resistance to antifungals among most pathogenic fungi poses a growing public health concern, as highlighted by recent studies (Kaur and Nobile
2023; Vitiello etal. 2023). This threat is not conned to specic regions but extends
globally. It affects various nations, including low and middle-income countries (Ambe etal. 2020; Codda etal. 2023; Díaz-García etal. 2023; Freitas etal. 2023; Sathi etal. 2023). While different mechanisms are responsible for Candida resis­tance to antifungals (Bhattacharya etal. 2020; Czajka etal. 2023), the development of resistance is closely linked to the formation of biolms. This has been shown in a study that reported that C. albicans biolms, after 48h, were more than eight times more resistant to all antifungals than non-biolm-forming cells (Hawser and Douglas 1995). Similarly, C. parapsilosis biolms displayed heightened resistance to various antifungals, including amphotericin B, uconazole, voriconazole, nystatin, and several other antifungals (Kuhn etal. 2002a, b). Several factors con­tribute to the increased resistance observed during Candida biolm growth. These factors include elevated metabolic activity during the initial process of biolm (Ramage etal. 2005; Desai and Mitchell. 2015).
The ECM may also inuence antifungal drug resistance. It has been proposed
that it acts as a barrier, enhancing Candida cells’ resistance to drugs like amphoteri­cin B (Lucas and Silva 2023; Massey etal. 2023). Upregulation of MDR and CDR genes in C. alibicans brings about changes in the expression of genes involved in
250
M. I. Elibe and N. E. Innocent
biolm formation. These genes encode azole-resistance transporters (Shi et al.
2019; Costa-de-Oliveira and Rodrigues 2020). In C. glabrata that forms biolms,
TPO1-2, CDR1, and CDR2 gene overexpression has been observed. TPO1-2 is involved in resistance to antifungal. It is also crucial for the expression of adhesion­related genes (Song etal. 2009; Pais etal. 2016; Santos etal. 2017). Indeed, C. gla- brata biolms have been demonstrated to exhibit signicantly higher resistance to antifungals than planktonic cells (Song etal. 2009; Seneviratne etal. 2010).
Moreover, akin to observations in other microorganisms, persister cells exist
within C. albicans biolms. The identication of persisters in Candida species has been associated with biolms that remain unaffected by antifungals (Denega etal.
2019). These dormant, nondividing cells display signicant resistance to antimicro-
bial drugs. This attribute is due to their dormancy, which helps to prevent drugs from getting to their targets (Lewis 2007). Persister cells within biolms demon­strate resistance to antifungals (e.g., uconazole). When the cells are grown within a biolm, they also exhibit elevated expression of CDR genes (Wuyts etal. 2018).
Numerous uncertainties persist regarding Candida persister cells. Understanding
biolm plasticity and the role of persister cells in persistent infections is critical. In bacterial persister research, microuidics tools have been utilized to identify and isolate persister cells by assessing the cell population that survives antibiotic treat­ment and resumes growth after antibiotic removal. A similar approach could be applied to study fungal persister cells. Such a study could potentially open avenues for discovering novel antifungal candidates and developing newer drugs. So far, knowledge about fungal persister cells is limited. Moreover, there are no treatment options to eliminate fungal biolms completely. However, the successful eradica­tion of persister cells, as seen in some investigations (Galdiero etal. 2020), offers optimism. It suggests that in the future, fungal biolms may also be eradicated.
9.6 Conclusion andPerspective
This chapter underscores the complex processes occurring within cells that lead to the formation of Candida biolms. It has been established that the biolm forma­tion process includes adhesion, cell morphology changes, ECM formation, and bio­lm dispersal. Notably, factors that control each of these steps are species- or strain-specic in most cases. Several factors, including nutrient composition, inhibi­tors within a niche, environmental conditions, and microbiome in an environment, impact the ultimate characteristics of the biolm. Despite the existing knowledge, many aspects, particularly those related to biolm formation among non-Candida albicans cells, remain inadequately explored. Unfortunately, most non-albicans are posing major public health threats due to their frequent isolation and link to most infectious diseases. It is crucial to differentiate between biolms formed by diverse Candida spp., especially the non-albicans. It is also important to understand the biolm forms by commensal Candida populations. Understanding how this Candida population transitions to pathogens exhibiting biolm-forming propensity demands