Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5219_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
404
S. K. Shishodia et al.
2004a). As reported by Arendrup etal., azole medication treatment has seen a recent
failure in Danish clinical samples against A. terreus and emergence of azole resis­tance in A. terreus was recently observed with compromised immunity (Arendrup etal. 2012; Arendrup 2014; Zoran etal. 2018; Pastor and Guarro 2014). According to a study conducted by Alcazar-Fuoli, Laura et al., A. niger exhibited minimal variation in MICs in response to ITC (Alcazar-Fuoli etal. 2009; Szigeti etal. 2012) Moreover, the occurrence of biolm formation in A. niger has been reported (Paul etal. 2017a; Villena etal. 2009).
Aspergillus avus is predominantly found in dry regions and exhibits a remark­able ability to withstand harsh environmental conditions and known for aatoxin production and contaminating the food crops causing aatoxicosis, liver necrosis, and liver cancer (Krishnan etal. 2009; Tiwari and Shankar 2018a). The incidence of A. avus in India is about 45.4%, and around 2.5% are resistant to VRC with spe­cic genetic abnormalities in the cyp51C gene, namely, T788G and Y319H muta­tions (Chowdhary etal. 2015; Sharma etal. 2018; Liu etal. 2012b; Paul etal. 2015; Balajee et al. 2007). The MIC values, however, varied among different azoles (Rivero-Menendez etal. 2016) due to misuse or prolonged utilization of azole medi­cines (Hagiwara etal. 2016) or extensive use of fungicides in agricultural practices (Chowdhary etal. 2013; Snelders etal. 2009; Berger etal. 2017). Moreover, it is alarming that a signicant number of antifungal drugs nd difcult to control fungal infections (Van der Linden etal. 2015).
17.1.2 Current Therapeutic Strategies Against
Invasive Aspergillosis
Current therapeutic strategies for IA, a severe fungal infection caused primarily by Aspergillus species, typically involve antifungal therapies. Voriconazole has been considered the rst-line treatment for many years, as it has shown efcacy in clini­cal trials and real-world settings. Other options include AmB formulations, isavuco­nazole, and posaconazole, especially in cases of intolerance or resistance to voriconazole. The choice of therapy depends on factors, such as the patient’s under­lying health, the severity of the infection, and the susceptibility of the Aspergillus strain. Combinatorial therapy may also be considered in certain refractory cases. Timely diagnosis and appropriate management are crucial, as IA can be life­threatening, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. The current treatment regime includes azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins group among the antifungal drugs (Miceli and Kauffman 2015). Echinocandins, such as anidulafungin, caspo­fungin (CAS), and micafungin, are a class of antifungal medications. The three mentioned conventional drugs exhibited distinct mechanisms of action when target­ing fungal pathogens. In addition to these, AmB tends to bind to ergosterol, result­ing in alterations to membrane activities (Arendrup 2014). AmB has demonstrated diminished efcacy in treating infections caused by A. terreus, particularly those associated with IA. Furthermore, this reduced effectiveness extends to other Aspergillus species that have developed resistance to AmB.Combination therapy is
17 Drug-Resistance Patterns in Opportunistic Aspergilli: A Molecular…
405
benecial in circumstances where intrinsic AmB resistance and high toxicity­associated concerns are present (Dannaoui etal. 2004; Elefanti etal. 2013). Toxicity in humans associated with AmB encompasses several negative effects, particularly in children aficted with IA.Notably, the administration of AmB at doses ranging from 3mg/kg to 5mg/kg has been linked to the occurrence of infusion-related ill­nesses, nephrotoxicity, and hypokalemia (Canadian Paediatric Society ID, UD ICA
2010). Nevertheless, studies have demonstrated that liposomal AmB (L-AMB) can
effectively mitigate toxicity in individuals with IA and exhibit prolonged efcacy against Aspergillus strains that are resistant to azole medications (Seyedmousavi etal. 2013). Another class of antifungals known as triazoles is widely recognized and extensively studied in clinical research. Azole compounds have been found to have an impact on the production of ergosterol, leading to the disruption of fungal cell walls’ structure as well as function (Sanglard and Odds 2002). Presently, there is a global occurrence of resistance to azoles in A. fumigatus, which poses a concern to azole therapy for aspergillosis (Verweij etal. 2016). The Aspergillosis Medication Guidelines advise using voriconazole (VRC) for IA.ITC and POS may be used for salvage therapy in addition to VRC. As voriconazole is the preferred treatment, azole-resistant strains have increased, resulting in more clinical failures. Thus, azole (VRC) and echinocandins are used to treat both azole-resistant and azole- susceptible A. fumigatus isolates. Echinocandin inhibits cell wall biosynthesis by preventing β-glucan biosynthesis (Arendrup 2014). In the context of combination therapy, it was observed that COS and VRC demonstrated efcacy against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) caused by A. niger and A. avus; however, limitations have been reported in IPA caused by A. fumigatus (Krishnan-Natesan etal. 2012; Zhang etal.
2014). Noteworthy, a combination of regimen showed a decrease in mortality rate
(19.3%) as compared to the use of monotherapy (27.5%) (Marr etal. 2015). In addi­tion, a strategies need to be extend for improved therapy to successfully address the current situation (Denning etal. 2013).
Globally, signicant concerns arise from medication toxicity and the elevated exposure of humans to fungicides (Damalas and Eleftherohorinos 2011; Dorner
2004). Further investigation into new therapeutic targets for fungal infections is
required due to the structural resemblances shared by fungal cells and human cells (Scorzoni etal. 2017). In addition, a signicant proportion of pathogenic fungi have developed a mechanism of resistance to commonly used antifungal medications employing the processing, over-expression, and proliferation of fungal biolm pro­teins (da Silva Ferreira etal. 2004; Mowat etal. 2009). The calcineurin signaling in Aspergilli is associated with the protein of calcineurin and its involvement in vari­ous biological processes (Juvvadi etal. 2017). In addition, it plays a role in the regu­lation of ergosterol biosynthesis, chitin production, and β-glucan synthesis. Furthermore, there has been a recent discovery of triphenylethylene as a novel chemical that effectively inhibits the calcineurin pathway through the activation of calmodulin (Cramer etal. 2008; Jacob etal. 2015; Shankar etal. 2018b). Therole of calcineurin–Crz1 signaling under antifungal has been studied in Aspergillus a- vus (Shishodia etal. 2020). Moreover, the targeting of microtubule synthesis inhibi- tion and heat shock proteins (Hsp90 and Hsp70) has been identied as novel
406
strategies for antifungal treatment (Jacob etal. 2015). Furthermore, less toxic anti­fungals such as N-methyl-N--fructose have been developed in the last decade through the use of innovative antimicrobial formulations and structural enhance­ments. One such AmB derivative is AmB methyl ester (Szlinder-Richert etal. 2001). Echinocandins are presently the prevailing antifungal pharmaceutical drugs that have obtained licensing. This particular family of antifungal drug inhibits the for­mation of cell wall components during fungal infections (Pianalto and Alspaugh
2016). Furthermore, novel azole compounds (PC945 and PC1244) were synthesised
to specically target and combat aspergillosis and counteract resistance in strains of A. fumigatus (Colley etal. 2017). In addition, olorom (F901318) is a newly discov- ered drug that has shown promise in combating life-threatening Aspergillus infec- tions (Buil etal. 2017). Therefore, it is imperative to consider alternate therapeutic approaches, such as immunotherapy utilizing antifungal agents (Thakur and Shankar 2017a).
In conclusion, the efcacy, accessibility, and adverse effects of existing antifun­gal medications are relatively insignicant. The prolonged utilization and improper administration of these medications have been found to result in the emergence of drug-resistant strains (Denning and Bromley 2015). Recent studies indicate that the emergence of drug-resistant fungal strains has elevated invasive fungal infections to become the most signicant global threat (Chowdhary etal. 2017; Lockhart etal.
2017; Navalkele etal. 2017). Currently, no FDA-approved vaccines are effective.
The frequent exposure to environmental fungi, commensally related to other fungi and fragile immune responses in immunocompromised patients, makes effective­ness of the vaccine attempt difcult (McCarthy etal. 2017). Some vaccines have shown promise in clinical trials, but many obstacles remain (Sandini etal. 2011). Thus, immune mechanisms must be understood to develop an anti-fungal vaccine.
S. K. Shishodia et al.
17.2 The Molecular Dissection oftheResistance Mechanism
inAspergilli
The efcacy of antifungal medications employed in the management of diverse manifestations of aspergillosis is hindered by the emergence of resistance in Aspergillus. Moreover, the protracted utilization of antifungal medication consti­tutes a signicant factor contributing to the development of acquired drug resis­tance. The outcome is contingent upon various factors, including the specic Aspergillus species, the efcacy of antifungal medications, and the geographical context. While there are available data on drug-resistance genes and mutations in the genome, the restricted range of therapeutic options poses challenges in effec­tively managing invasive secondary fungal infections. The primary classications of drug-resistance mechanisms encompass three major categories. First, alterations in drug targets occur as a result of mutations in the target, leading to a reduced binding capacity between the drug and its target. Second, drug efcacy is diminished due to various factors, such as increased drug efux, overexpression of drug targets, and sequestration of antifungal drugs. Finally, metabolic bypass includes the
17 Drug-Resistance Patterns in Opportunistic Aspergilli: A Molecular…
407
establishment of compensatory mechanisms that negate the antifungal agents (Sanglard 2016).
The investigation of Aspergilli genome sequencing facilitatesthe knowledge on the pathogenesis and the metabolic pathways of mycotoxins (Thakur and Shankar
2017b), including drug resistance. The investigation of Aspergilli mRNA has the
potential to elucidate the organism’s ability to react to outer stimuli, such as antifun­gal drugs or morphological switch (Shankar etal. 2018a). In addition, they facilitate the prediction of interactions between host pathogens in both in-vitro and in-vivo scenarios (Thakur and Shankar 2019). However, it is important to note that mRNA­level studies alone may not offer a comprehensive understanding without the inclu­sion of functional investigations, such as proteomics analysis (Shankar 2022; Shishodia and Shankar 2020). Mellado etal. (2001) reported that the primary tar­gets of azoles are the Cyp51A and Cyp51B proteins. These two entities are encoded by distinct genes, although they exhibit a sequence identity of 63%. Azole-resistant strains of A. fumigatus exhibit resistance mechanisms through the presence of point mutations or overexpression of the cyp51A gene (Mellado et al. 2001;Snelders etal. 2010). Triazoles exhibit an interaction with the active site of Cyp51A, hence impeding the process of ergosterol production. Fungal cell death is attributed to changes in membrane uidity, as documented by (Snelders et al. 2009) and (Chowdhary etal. 2014). The extensive utilization of several azole fungicides in agricultural settings has demonstrated a comparable molecular composition to medicinal triazoles, leading to the emergence of cross-resistance in clinical applica­tions (Snelders etal. 2012). In a recent study conducted by Hagiwara etal. 2016, an examination was carried out on the mutation occurrences at various locations within the cyp51 genes, as well as the tandem repeats in the promoter region (TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A) in Aspergilli (Hagiwara etal. 2016). The major molecu­lar determinants contributing for Azole resistance in Aspergillus is tabulated in Table17.1.
Previous studies have proposed that the overexpression of genes in A. terreus involved in the manufacture of ergosterol, including ERG5, ERG6, and ERG25, may provide resistance to AmB (Barker etal. 2004; Deak etal. 2009; Walsh etal.
2003). According to Blum etal. (2013), it has been observed that Aspergillus strains
exhibit reduced absorption of the AmB medication. In addition, resistance isolates of A. terreus have demonstrated more effective protective mechanisms against oxi- dative damage caused by the drug (Blum etal. 2013). Based on a recent study by Jukic etal. (2017), it was observed that in Aspergilli, strains with AmB resistance exhibited higher superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity as compared to susceptible isolates. SOD functions to mitigate the harmful effects of superoxide anions, which serve as the precursors for reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Jukic et al. 2017). Furthermore, Bruns etal. (2010a) discovered a signicant increase in the production of gliotoxin, a redox-active metabolite, in the biolms of A. fumigatus. This elevate the production of gliotoxin contributes to the resistance of A. fumigatus by facilitat­ing its growth and persistence within the host tissue (Bruns etal. 2010a).
Blatzer etal. (2015a) propose that Hsp70, a crucial protein, may serve as a regu­lator for AmB resistance. The utilization of inhibitors targeting Hsp70 and Hsp90
408
References
Snelders etal. (2012),
Snelders etal. (2010),
common
Amino acid
substitution Remark
Howard and Arendrup
(2011), Losada etal.
(2015) and Vahedi
Shahandashti and
Lass-Flörl (2019)
mechanism
Barker etal. (2004),
Howard and Arendrup
(2011) and Losada etal.
(2015)
susceptibilities
E, K, R, V, W No azole
Losada etal. (2015),
Vahedi Shahandashti and
Lass-Flörl (2019) and
Howard and Arendrup
(2011)
Losada etal. (2015) and
Vahedi Shahandashti and
susceptibility to
voriconazole
K, I, T, V Variable
posaconazole
S. K. Shishodia et al.
Lass-Flörl (2019)
Losada etal. (2015),
Vahedi Shahandashti and
Lass-Flörl (2019) and
Howard and Arendrup
susceptibilities not
reported
combination with
TR34/L98H
(2011)
Azole resistant
phenotype
Pan-azole H Highly resistant
Function
Cytochrome P-450-dependent enzyme
Gene encoding drug-
resistance determinant
Table 17.1 Molecular determinants and cellular alterations that confer azole resistance against Aspergillus spp. (Szalewski etal. 2018)
cyp51A a.k.a. erg11A
Itraconazole,
posaconazole
involved in sterol biosynthesis
(14-sterol demethylase)
(Afu4g06890)
Ergosterol biosynthesis in Aspergillus
involves C-22 sterol desaturase (erg5),
erg5 (Afu1g03950), erg6
(Afu4g03630), erg25
Itraconazole and
Posaconazole
resistant
(24)-sterol C-methyltransferase (erg6),
and C-4 methyl sterol oxidase (erg25),
with uconazole resistance being a
potential issue
methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase,
a crucial enzyme in mevalonate
(Afu8g02440) (orthologs
to ERG5, ERG6, and
ERG25 in C. albicans)
hmg1 (Afu2g03700) Mutations in 3-Hydroxy-3-
Itraconazole D Voriconazole and
synthesis and ergosterol biosynthesis,
are linked to voriconazole resistance
ssc70 (Afu2g09960) Putative mitochondrial Hsp70
Pan-azole H Reported in
chaperone; a high level of resistance to
itraconazole
signaling; multiple azole resistance
ganA (Afu3g12400) G-protein involved in cAMP-mediated
17 Drug-Resistance Patterns in Opportunistic Aspergilli: A Molecular…
References
Losada etal. (2015),
Vahedi Shahandashti and
Lass-Flörl (2019) and
Howard and Arendrup
(2011)
Kanafani and Perfect
combination with
Amino acid
substitution Remark
G448
1 Balashov etal. (2006) and
during
(2008)
long-term
Samar etal. (2015)
azole
treatment
I Reported only in
Lamoth etal. (2014) and
Howard and Arendrup
combination with
TR34/L98H
posaconazole
A Voriconazole and
(2011)
Al Abdallah etal. (2012),
Vahedi Shahandashti and
susceptibilities not
reported
voriconazole and
S Susceptibility to
Lass-Flörl (2019) and
Howard and Arendrup
(2011)
Abdallah and Fortwendel
Posaconazole
T Reported only in
409
(continued)
(2015) and Vahedi
Shahandashti and
Lass-Flörl (2019)
combination with
TR34/L98H
Azole resistant
phenotype
Pan-azole Y Reported in
Function
ABC multiple drug transporter;
multiple azole resistance
Gene encoding drug-
resistance determinant
ABC transporter
(Afu4g14760)
Pan-azole, G, K Acquired
fks1 (Afu6g12400) 1,3--Glucan synthetase activity and
Itraconazole and
posaconazole
resistant
the likely lethal target of
echinocandins; SNPs are associated
with resistance
proposed mixed-linkage glucosyl
transferase, which is hypothesized to
tft1 (Afu3g03620) Current evidence suggests that the
Itraconazole
resistant
be involved in the mechanisms of
action of caspofungin, is not accurate
and cell wall integrity; enzyme
Hsp90 (Afu5g04170) Heat-shock chaperone for conidiation
itraconazole
overproduction determines resistance
to caspofungin
Ras family GTPase proteins Pan-azole,
rasA (Afu5g11230), rasB
(Afu2g07770)
Itraconazole,
pan-azole and
posaconazole
resistant
farnesyltransferase activity
ram1 (Afu4g10330) Ortholog(s) have protein
410
References
Abdallah and Fortwendel
(2015) and Vahedi
and posaconazole
Amino acid
substitution Remark
Shahandashti and
Lass-Flörl (2019)
Howard and Arendrup
(2011) and Panepinto
etal. (2002)
Pais etal. (2016)
susceptibilities
found
susceptibilities
S. K. Shishodia et al.
susceptibilities
Azole resistant
phenotype
Itraconazole L No Voriconazole
Function
Gene encoding drug-
resistance determinant
Table 17.1 (continued)
erfD (Afu3g06470) Zinc ion binding activity; potential
palmitoyl transferase activity
rhbA (Afu5g05480) Ras-related signaling protein Itraconazole K, T, V No azole
Ergosterol No azole
Upc2B was shown to regulate the
expression of Erg2 and Erg3
Upc2
Transcriptional factor
17 Drug-Resistance Patterns in Opportunistic Aspergilli: A Molecular…
411
has been found to substantially enhance the effectiveness of AmB and azole medi­cines in resistant A. terreus isolates (Blatzer etal. 2015a, b; Cowen and Lindquist
2005; Tiwari etal. 2015). Antimicrobial resistance toward Aspergillus includes itra-
conazole, azoles, echinocandin, voriconazole, uconazole, ketoconazole, and AmB. Aspergillus species causes aspergillosis, cutaneous aspergillosis, aspergil­loma, and paranasal sinuses, whose therapeutic options are decreasing due to increasing drug resistance (Howard and Arendrup 2011). Multiazole and pan-azole resistance is the most common type. The transcriptional factor responsible for medi­ating azole drug resistance in Aspergillus is SrbA.SrbA is a member of SREBP family which conceals bHLH proteins. Drug resistance is mediated by switching on the inference of cyp51 and the ERG11 orthologs in the pathogen. SrbA shares sequential similarities with SrbB. These two regulators upon coming together upregulate the heme biosynthesis and sterol demethylation genes (Pais etal. 2016). We have endeavored to gather all relevant data and establish connections between molecular factors and cellular alterations that contribute to the development of anti­fungal resistance in the most prevalent species of Aspergillus. This information is presented in Fig.17.1.
17.2.1 Role ofBiofilm inDrug Resistance
Microscopic organisms grow on sediment, skin, bark, rock, and mucosal tissues (Desai etal. 2014; Kolter and Greenberg 2006). The majority of bacterial and fungal pathogens in humans form biolms, which hinder drug response and host immunity. Biolm matrix may protect fungal cells from antifungals. Biolm formation by A. terreus is less studied than other species. A. fumigatus forms biolms with parallel- packed hyphae (Seidler etal. 2008) and an ECM (Al Abdallah etal. 2012). To eliminate biolm structures, A. fumigatus needs a higher MIC of antifungal drug, which is why it is drug-resistant. Biolm’s extracellular matrix may absorb antifun­gal molecules and prevent them from reaching fungal cells, conferring drug resis­tance. C. albicans ECM locks up antifungal drugs and reduces drug susceptibility (Nett et al. 2010). Antifungal drug-releasing multidrug-resistance protein is acti­vated in biolms. Current research links biolm development and drug resistance to cell wall protein cspA (Fan etal. 2015). Researchers have found biolms on dialysis catheters, including α-1, 3-glucans, Galactomannan, melanins, proteins, and hyphal cells (Loussert etal. 2010; Rajendran etal. 2013; Ramage etal. 2011). Along with this evidence, transcription factors have been studied for their role in biolm forma­tion. Agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) proteins and Hyr1-like CFEM proteins indi­cate their involvement. An efux-pump role in azole resistance has been well-documented, which may contribute to aspergillosis treatment failure (Rajendran et al. 2013). At biolm formation, metabolic changes linked to virulence are observed (Muszkieta etal. 2013). Until now, the potential has been observed that in A. fumigatus, ECM releases eDNA and glycosaminoglycans, which aid drug resis­tance. Drug resistance in biolm is also caused by increased MDR transporter pro­duction and overexpression of genes involved in iron metabolism, ergosterol
412
S. K. Shishodia et al.
Fig. 17.1 Key molecular modulators of drug resistance against Aspergillus spp. Current medications possess inherent and acquired resistance mechanisms,
which encompass mutations in any of the crucial genes in Aspergillus spp. result in (c) modications in the target protein/enzyme, which subsequently cause
(a) changes in the binding sites and lead to target incompatibility. The (b), outow of drugs is enhanced by transmembrane transport proteins known as ABC
transporters, which are regulated by AtrR, a transcription factor that controls ABC transporter activity. In addition, (d) impairing ergosterol biosynthesis through
deletion or dysfunction leads to disruption of cell wall components. Remodeling of the cell wall results in the formation of biolms and the switching of meta-
bolic processes, which are regulated by Hsp90/Hsp70. Furthermore, (e) these alterations in metabolic pathways result in oxidative stress within the mitochon-
dria, which can be counteracted by the antioxidant enzymes Catalase and SOD.The explanation of all routes leads to the modication of the TCA cycle, ETC,
glycolysis, cell wall components, and signaling pathways, which contribute to antifungal tolerance in Aspergillus. Overall, the Cellular resistance mechanisms
are intricately connected to molecular alterations in Aspergillus species. Note: ECM extracellular matrix, GAG galactosaminogalactan, NADH dehydrogenase,
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase, ROS reactive oxygen species, CRZ1 calcineurin-regulated zinc nger transcription factor, HSP heat shock
protein, FKs1 1,3-beta-glucan synthase, CYP51 sterol 14 alpha demethylase, ERG11 lanosterol 14 alpha demethylase, ERG5 C-22 sterol desaturase, ERG6
C24-sterol C-methyltransferase, ERG25 C-4 methyl sterol oxidase, SrbB signal recognition particle B (a small GTPase protein), PtaB protein tyrosine phos-
phatase B, AtrR ABC transcriptional factor
17 Drug-Resistance Patterns in Opportunistic Aspergilli: A Molecular…
413
pathways, ABC, and MFS transporters. Hypoxic microenvironment and nutritional gradients cause metabolic adaptation, including downregulation of TCA cycle, gly­colysis induction, and amino acid metabolism changes, as shown in Fig.17.1 (Liu etal. 2022). Unfortunately, current treatments are failing to treat these dangerous biolm-related infections, so more research is needed to determine how biolms affect drug resistance. Rayón-López etal. 2023 investigated brain biolm formation in A. terreus and found nucleic acid, carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. They iden- tied A. terreus isolates with lipid-like biolms that may increase AmB resistance (Rayón-López etal. 2023). In an AmB-resistant isolate of A. terreus, Sonia etal. noted the role of few secretory protein-induced biolm formation. These secretory proteins may play a crucial role in understanding the role of biolms in drug resis­tance (Sonia Kumari and Jata 2020). Thus, by understanding the lipids metabolism lamentous fungi biolms, more research is needed.
17.2.2 Combating Drug Resistance inAspergilli
It is imperative to comprehend the metabolic modications in drug-resistant isolates and susceptible isolates of Aspergilli. The emergence of drug resistance is facili­tated by a range of mechanisms, such as the alteration of drug–target interactions via the upregulation or downregulation of proteins implicated in cell wall modula­tion, oxidative stress, heat shock proteins, and energy metabolism. In addition, anti­fungal resistance is inuenced by various factors, including redox imbalance, homeostasis of ROS, and changes in membrane uidity in aspergilli. An alternative mechanism contributing to antifungal drug resistance involves the creation of bio­lms, facilitating the attachment of fungal cells to the surface of the host. The pri­mary molecular targets of azole antifungal agents are the enzymes Cyp51A and Cyp51B.The proteins Hsp70 and Hsp90 play a signicant role in cellular protection under conditions of stress. As per literature, Sod2, Cat1, thioredoxin peroxide, Hsp70, and Hsp90 as potential targets in Aspergillus isolates exhibit resistance (Shishodia et al. 2019). We attempt to collect all information and correlate all molecular factors to cellular changes that contribute to antifungal-resistance mecha­nism against most leading species of Aspergillus, as presented in Fig.17.1.
Thus, understanding various metabolic and immunological pathways is crucial to develop vaccine against Aspergillus infection or drugs to tackle the drug resis­tance. In this context, our laboratory is also focusing on the investigation of new drug targets in aspergilli. The literature-based analysis revealed that 72 Aspergillus proteins are abundant during interaction with antifungal agents and 26 proteins are affected by multiple antifungal molecules that showed general stress response (Shishodia etal. 2019; Shishodia and Shankar 2020). The crucial role of proteins such as Sod2, Prx1/LsfA, thioredoxin peroxide (Aspf 3), enolase, Cat1, Hsp70, and Hsp90 was found in Aspergilli under the inuence of antifungal, further exploring that the role of these proteins in the resistant mechanism may provide detailed insight into the drug-resistance mechanism (Shishodia et al. 2019). Figure 17.2 demonstrates the critical signicance of all these molecular determinants in the