Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_953_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Dedication
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Technique
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Anatomy
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications

FIGURE24-4Meticuloushemostasisoftheexcisionbed
isimportantpriortotransverseclosure.
Thedefectistransverselyclosedwithrunningabsorbablesutures.For
largedefects,itishelpfultoorientthetransverseclosurebystartingwith
asinglesutureinthecentertoapproximatethetwoedgesandorientthe
lineofclosure.
Followingtheclosure,thesuturelineshouldbeinspectedand
interrogatedforanydefects.Therectallumenabovethelineofclosure
shouldalsobeinspectedtoconfirmthattherectallumenhasnotbeen
obliteratedbytheclosure.
Inmanycases,theclosureofthewoundisdifficultorresultsin
significantnarrowingoftherectallumen.Inthesecases,itissafetoleave
thesewoundsopentohealbysecondaryintention;however,inour
experience,thesepatientshavesignificantlymorepainpostoperatively.
Intherarecasesofapedunculatedorextremelymobilerectalpolyp,it
issometimespossibletoevertthepolypthroughtheanalcanalandexcise
thelesionwithanEndoGIAstapler.
Althoughmoreproximalrectalpolypsshouldoftenbeexcisedby
transanalendoscopicmicrosurgeryorlowanteriorresection,itispossible
toexciselesionsusinganoperatingproctoscopeandatransanalsnare.As
thisisnotafull-thicknessexcision,itshouldbereservedforbenign
tumors.Whileattemptingtoremovealesionwiththesnare,greatcare
shouldbetakenwithanteriorandanterolateraltumorstoavoidentering
theperitonealcavity.Largerlesionsshouldbeexcisedinapiecemeal
fashionasanenblocsnareexcisioncanoftenresultinafull-thickness
injurytotherectalwall.

POSTOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
Themajorityofpatientscanbetreatedintheoutpatientsetting.As
urinaryretentionisacommonpostoperativecomplication,patients
shouldbeabletovoidpriortodischarge.Inourpractice,patientswho
haveanopenwoundaredischargedon7daysoforalantibiotics.Patients
shouldbegivenanamplesupplyofpainmedicationsandstoolsofteners.
Sitzbathsmayprovidesomereliefforpatientswithlowlesionsthat
extenddownintotheanalcanal.

COMPLICATIONS
Complicationswithtransanalexcisionsaresimilartothoseofother
anorectalproceduresandincludeurinaryretentionandbleeding.
Althoughpelvicsepsisisrare,itshouldbeconsideredinpatientswho
developfever,worseningpain,ordelayedurinaryretention.Ifsepsisis
suspected,thepatientshouldbeexpeditiouslytakentotheoperating
roomforanexaminationunderanesthesia.Rectaloranalstenosisaftera
transanalexcisionisararecomplicationthatisusuallycorrectedwith
simpledilation.

RESULTS
Theutilityoftraditionaltransanalexcisionhascomeintoquestionwith
theemergenceofothertransanaltechniquessuchastransanalendoscopy
surgery(TES).Severalsmall,single-institutioncomparativestudieshave
beenperformedwithrelativelyconsistentresults.Theseresultshavealso
beenvalidatedinarecentsystematicreview.ThedataindicatethatTES
issuperiortotransanalexcisionwithsignificantlyhighernegativemargin
rates(OR5.3,95%CI3.2–8.7)anddecreasedspecimenfragmentation
rates(OR0.096,95%CI0.044–0.21).TEMisalsosuperiortotransanal
excisionwithadecreasedrateoftumorrecurrence(OR0.25,95%CI
0.15–0.40).Theredoesnotappeartobeanydifferencebetweenthetwo
proceduresintermsofcomplications.
p.188
p.189
AlthoughtheliteratureclearlysupportstheefficacyofTESover
transanalexcision,itshouldbenotedthatTEScanbetechnicallydifficult
toperformforlowlesionsintheanalcanal.Giventheseresults,one
shouldconsiderTESinsteadoftransanalexcisionforneoplasmsinthe
rectumabovetheanalcanal.

CONCLUSIONS
Transanalexcisionisaminimallyinvasivemeansbywhichtoremovea
rectaltumor,butitisbynomeansasimpleprocedure.Thekeytothe
surgeryliesinadequateexposureandlighting.Althoughappropriatefor
benigndistalrectallesions,carefulselectionshouldbeusedformalignant
lesionsthataretobetreatedwithlocalexcisionalone.Alternativemeans
ofresectionsuchasTESshouldbeconsideredforlesionscephaladtothe
analcanal.

RECOMMENDEDREFERENCESAND
READINGS
BledayR,BreenE,JessupJM,BurgessA,SentovichSM,SteeleGJr.Prospectiveevaluationof
localexcisionforsmallrectalcancers.DisColonRectum1997;40:388–92.
BonnenM,CraneC,VautheyJN,etal.Long-termresultsusinglocalexcisionafterpreoperative
chemoradiationamongselectedT3rectalcancerpatients.IntJRadiatOncolBiolPhys
2004;60:1098–105.
BorschitzT,HeintzA,JungingerT.Theinfluenceofhistopathologiccriteriaonthelong-term
prognosisoflocallyexcisedpT1rectalcarcinomas:resultsoflocalexcision(transanal
endoscopicmicrosurgery)andimmediatereoperation.DisColonRectum2006;49:1492–506;
discussion500–5.
ChristoforidisD,ChoHM,DixonMR,MellgrenAF,MadoffRD,FinneCO.Transanalendoscopic
microsurgeryversusconventionaltransanalexcisionforpatientswithearlyrectalcancer.Ann
Surg2009;249:776–82.
ClancyC,BurkeJP,AlbertMR,etal.Transanalendoscopicmicrosurgeryversusstandard
transanalexcisionfortheremovalofrectalneoplasms:asystematicreviewandmeta-analysis.
DisColonRectum2015;58:254–61.
GordonP,NivatvongS,eds.NeoplasmsoftheColon,Rectum,andAnus.NewYork,NY:Informa
Healthcare,2007:328–39.
GordonP,NivatvongS,eds.PrinciplesandPracticeofSurgeryfortheColon,Rectum,andAnus.
NewYork,NY:InformaHealthcare,1999:491–9.
HanJ,NohGT,CheongC,etal.Transanalendoscopicoperationversusconventionaltransanal
excisionforrectaltumors:case-matchedstudywithpropensityscorematching.WorldJSurg
2017;41:2387–94.
MadboulyKM,RemziFH,ErkekBA,etal.RecurrenceaftertransanalexcisionofT1rectalcancer:
shouldwebeconcerned?DisColonRectum2005;48:711–9;discussion9–21.
MooreJS,CataldoPA,OslerT,HymanNH.Transanalendoscopicmicrosurgeryismoreeffective
thantraditionaltransanalexcisionforresectionofrectalmasses.DisColonRectum
2008;51:1026–30.
NascimbeniR,BurgartLJ,NivatvongsS,LarsonDR.RiskoflymphnodemetastasisinT1
carcinomaofthecolonandrectum.DisColonRectum2002;45:200–6.
NastroP,BeralD,HartleyJ,MonsonJR.Localexcisionofrectalcancer:reviewofliterature.Dig
Surg2005;22:6–15.
RothenbergerD,Garcia-AguilarJ.Rectalcancer:localtreatment.In:FazioV,ChurchJ,Delaney
C,eds.CurrentTherapyinColonandRectalSurgery.Philadelphia,PA:ElsevierMosby,
2005:179–84.
SaclaridesTJ.TEM/localexcision:indications,techniques,outcomes,andthefuture.JSurg
Oncol2007;96:644–50.

Chapter25
TransanalEndoscopic
Operating
DeborahS.KellerandSamAtallah
INTRODUCTION
Advancedlocalexcisiontechniquesforbenignandearlystagerectal
tumorsareincreasinglybeingutilizedbecauseoftheirlowmorbidity,and
excellentfunctionalandoncologicoutcomesforwell-selectedlesions.
excellentfunctionalresults,andexcellentoncologicoutcomesforwellselectedlesions.Thevideoendoscopicplatformsforlocalexcision—
transanalendoscopicmicrosurgery(TEM),transanalminimallyinvasive
surgery,andtransanalendoscopicoperation(TEO)—havebeenshownto
offersuperiorvisualization,precision,andlowerratesofspecimen
fragmentationandmarginpositivityinmalignantdiseasecomparedwith
traditionaltransanalexcision(TAE).Althoughtheadvancedvideo
endoscopicplatformsallprovidethesamehigh-qualitylocalexcision,
thereareimportantdifferencesanddistinctionsamongplatforms.

INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
Indications
TEOisanadvancedvideoendoscopicplatformusedforTAEofrectal
tumors.TEOhasgainedinterestamongcolorectalsurgeonsbecauseof
theenhancedvisibility,superioroptics,andlongerreachintherectum
thataffordsamorecomplete,full-thicknessexcisionandpreciseclosure
oftherectaldefect.TEOcanbeusedineitherbenignormalignant
disease,andreachesmostlesionsinthelow,mid,andupperrectum
(Table25-1).
TABLE25-1 IndicationsforTEO
Earlystagerectaltumors
Largevillousadenomas
Rectalcarcinoidtumors
Palliativetreatmentforadvancedrectal
cancerorpatientsmedicallyunfitformajor
surgery
NaturalOrificeTransluminalEndoscopic
Surgery
Transanalportionofcombinedabdominal
andtransanalresections
Inmalignantdisease,theindicationsforTEOgenerallyfollowthe
NationalCancerComprehensiveNetwork(NCCN)guidelinesforlocal
excisionofrectalmasses:benignandwelltomoderatelydifferentiatedT1
tumors<3cminsize,thatoccupylessthanathirdofthebowelwall
circumference,andwithouthigh-riskfeatures.Specifically,TEOaloneis
supportedforTisandfavorablecT1lesions.Onlypatientswithmagnetic
resonanceimaging(MRI)orultrasoundstagingrulingoutinvasionofthe
muscularispropriaaresuitableforTEOforcurativeintent.Forthese
earlycancers,TEOtreatmentissafeandcanachievelowlocalrecurrence
andhighsurvivalrateswhencomparedwithconventionaltransanal
excisional.InhighergradeT2tumorsorunfavorableT1tumors,TEOcan
beusedwithneoadjuvantoradjuvanttreatmentonaclinicaltrialbasis.
TEOcanbeusedforpalliativeresectioninadvancedrectalcancers.In
patientswithadvancedormetastaticrectaltumorsthatprecludecurative

resection,orpatientsmedicallyunabletotoleratemoreextensive
surgery,localexcisioncansignificantlyrelievesymptomsoftenesmus,
obstruction,andbleedingandimprovequalityoflife.Rectalcarcinoid
tumors<10mminsizethathavenotinvadedthesubmucosacanbe
resectedwithcurativeintentbyTEO.
TEOisindicatedforresectionoflargeadenomatouslesions.Larger
polyps,especiallythevilloustype,haveasignificantrateofcontaining
invasivecarcinomas,evenwhenpelvicMRIandendorectalultrasound
confirmaT0N0mass.TEOiscapableofresectinglesionsspanning
acrossthreequadrantsorupto10–12cmindiameter.Thefull-thickness
en-blocspecimencanserveasa“completebiopsy,”allowingforamore
accuratepathologicassessmentanddiseasestaging.Wheninvasive
canceroradversepathologicfactorsarefound,TEMcansafelybeusedas
abridgetoradicalresection,asappropriate.
Withtheincreasingadoptionoftransanaltotalmesorectaldissection,
TEOhasfoundanindicationinthetransanalportionoftheresection.
TEOgivestheadvantagesofsuperiorvisualizationandidentificationof
theanatomyinthedeeppelvis,foranoptimalmesorectaloncologic
dissectionwithsphincterpreservation.TheprogressionofNaturalOrifice
TransluminalEndoscopicSurgeryalsoprovidesanindicationforTEO,
wherespecimenextractioncanbeperformedthroughthistransanal
platform.
p.191
p.192
Contraindications
TheabsolutecontraindicationstoTEOarebasedonlocationand
invasion.Thelengthoftherectoscopedeterminestheproximallimits
whilethedistallimitisattheanalverge.Anatomicalfeaturescanbea
relativecontraindication,withanarrowrectosigmoidjunction,small
rectalampulla,andpriorabdominalorpelvicprocedureslimitingthe
abilitytoplacetherectoscope.Foradvancedlesionswithinvasion
throughthesubmucosa(T1)andintothemuscularispropria(T2)or
lesionswithhigh-riskhistologicfeatures,TEOisnotappropriatefor
curativeintentandshouldbeofferedonlyforpalliationorinmedically
unfitpatientsunabletotoleratemoreextensivesurgery.

PREOPERATIVEPLANNING
Preoperativeplanningisparamountforalllocalexcision.Propercase
selectionismandatoryfortheuseofTEOinthecurativetreatmentof
earlyrectalcancers.AllpossibleTEOcandidatesshouldundergofull
preoperativestagingaccordingtotheNCCNguidelines.Acomplete
colonoscopywithmultifocalbiopsyshouldbeperformedfortissue
diagnosis.Rigidproctoscopyisnecessarytoconfirmtheproximalextent
ofthemass,distancefromtheanalverge,size,andlocationbyquadrant
(anterior,posterior,rightorleftlateral).Endorectalultrasoundisadvised
foraccuratetumorandregionallymphnodestaging,whereaspelvicMRI
isavaluablecomplementtoconfirmtumorstageandlymphnodestatus.
Ifinvasivecancerissuspectedorconfirmed,acomputedtomography
scanofthethorax,abdominal,andpelvisisperformedtoruleout
distancemetastasis.Hematologicanalysisisperformed,includinga
completebloodcountandthetumormarkercarcinoembryonicantigen
(CEA)forabaselinevalue.
Forallpatients,functionalstatusiselicitedthroughavalidatedfecal
incontinencescale,suchastheClevelandClinic(Wexner)Fecal
IncontinenceScore.Ifsignsoffecalincontinencearepresent,anorectal
manometryisperformedtoobtainbaselinepressureandfunctional
values,andassuretheprocedureisappropriate.
Patientsareadvisedtoabstainfromnonsteroidalanti-inflammatory
drugs(NSAIDs)andprophylacticaspirinforaweekpreoperatively.
Therapeuticanticoagulationisnotstopped,andcarefulhemostasisis
ensuredinthesepatients.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
