Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_953_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Dedication
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Technique
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Anatomy
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications

FIGURE16-2AccessorytoolstoimplantanMAS.A.MAS
introducer(insertion)tool.B.MASsizingtool.

p.119
p.120
Therectovaginalseptumiscarefullydissectedfor3−5cmcephalad,
awayfromtheanalverge.
Abluntdissectionismadefromeachendoftheperinealincision
laterallyanddorsallytocreateaperianaltunnel.Onceatunnelhasbeen
fairlywellestablished,theintroducertoolencirclestheanalcanal,
workingthroughtheanococcygealligamentusingopposinghandsto
meetthetool,guidedwithafinger.
DetermineDeviceSize
Thesizingtool(Fig.16-2B)isputinplacebypullingthesuturethrough
theeyeoftheintroducertool.Theintroducertoolisrotated
counterclockwisetobringthesizingtoolthroughthetunnel.

Toproperlydeterminethedevicesize,thesizingtoolispulledtosnug
theanalcanal.
Thenumberonthesizingtoolindicatesthedevicesizeindicatedbelow
thelineshownonthetool.A17-beaddevicewasusedonthepatientin
thefigures.

ImplantationoftheDevice
Afterchangingglovesandflushingthewoundwithdilutediodine
solution,theselectedMASistakenfromthesterilepackageandbrought
throughthetunnelwiththeintroducertoolplacedbackintothetunnel.
ThesuturesoftheMASaretemporarilytiedtogetherpriortothe
fluoroscopycheckingtoensurethatthesizinghasbeenappropriate.A
devicewith1–3beadsopenontheX-raysisconsideredsatisfactory,
meaningwellappliedtotheanalcanal.Ifnotso,animplantofasmaller
sizehastobeplaced.

SutureloopsattheendsoftheMASarethencarefullytiedtosecurethe
device.
Thesubcutaneoustissueoverthedeviceisclosedwithslow-absorbing
braided3/0sutureintwolayerswithoutdrainageandafteralastiodine
solutionflush.Theskinincisionisclosedsimilarly.

POSTOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
Thedeviceimmediatelyfunctionswithoutanyinterventionfromthe
surgeonorthepatient.Thepatientmayimmediatelyresumearegular
diet.Nopost-operativeantibioticsarerequired.Minimalpostoperative
painisexpected.Passageofstoolsoonaftertheimplantationisimportant
toallowtheconstructionofacapsulearoundtheMASlargeenoughfora
completeopeningofthedevice.Therefore,regularpostoperativebowel
motionsareencouraged.Laxativesorsuppositoriesmayberequired.

COMPLICATIONS
Inmostreports,therateofcomplicationsleadingtoexplantationfrom
infection,erosion,andexstrutionvariesbetween6%and21%.Inarecent
5-yearfollow-upstudy,thedevelopmentofnewdevice-related
complicationsafter1yearwasuncommon,indicatingthedevicewas
generallysafeinthelongterm.
Otherregisteredadverseeventsmostcommonlybenignnotneeding
reoperationincludedefecatorydysfunctionandpain.Theneedfora
stomafollowinganMASimplantationisusuallyrelatedtoinefficacyof
thedevicetorestorecontinenceratherthantosepsis.

RESULTS
TherapeuticsuccessratesofMASintreatingsevereFIrangedbetween
53%and66%atfollow-upinthelatestpublications.Theinternational
feasibilitystudy,startedin2008,reportedon14patientsat6-month
follow-upasuccessin80%ofcaseswhenthedevicewasinplaceand
50%whenincluding3patientswhounderwentdeviceexplanation.Ina
recentsingle-centerstudyfromGermany,a6-monthtreatmentsuccess
rateof76%wasreportedwithaClevelandClinicIncontinenceScore
(CCIS)decreasingfrom17.5to7.3pointsandafecalincontinencequality
oflifequestionnaireimprovinginallfourdomains.In76%ofthe
implantedpatients,boweldiaryresultsshowedagreaterthan50%
reductioninthenumberofFIepisodesperweek.Similarmiddle-term
resultswereobservedinaFrenchseriesof23patients(Table16-2).
TABLE16-2 ResultsofMASImplantationinaSeriesof23Patients
Typeofstudy
Single-center,prospective,
nonrandomized
Nfemalepatients 23
Medianage(y)(range) 64(35–78)
Medianduration(y)ofFI(range) 8.8(1–40)
CCF-ISscorebaseline 15.2
CCF-ISscoreat6,12,24,and36mo 6.9,7.7,7.8,5.3
FIQoLquestionnairebaseline 1.97
FIQoLquestionnaireat6,12,24,and
36mo
3.19,3.11,2.92,2.93
Explanation 2
Satisfiedpatients 16
Wouldrecommendtootherpatients 14
Inamajorityofthesecaseserieswhenthedeviceiskeptinplace,MAS
ledtoasignificantimprovementinFIsymptomsasmeasuredbyCCISfor
upto2yearsoffollow-up.

CONCLUSIONS
TheMASappearstobeapromisinginnovation,butundoubtedlythereis
alearningcurvewiththistechnology,particularlyinpatientselection.
Presently,thesignificanceoftheMASinthetreatmentalgorithmofFIis
yettobedetermined.Withalimitednumberofpatientstreatedandonly
middle-termfollow-upavailable,itisyettobeobservediftheMAScan
withstandthetestoftime.Itisourhopethatthedevicewillagainbe
madeavailabletothepatientswhomightbenefitfromMASimplantation.

RECOMMENDEDREFERENCESAND
READINGS
BarussaudML,MantooS,WyartV,MeuretteG,LehurPA.Themagneticanalsphincterinfaecal
incontinence:isinitialsuccesssustainedovertime?ColorectalDis2013;15:1499–503.
LehurPA,McNevinS,BuntzenS,MellgrenAF,LaurbergS,MadoffRD.Magneticanalsphincter
augmentationforthetreatmentoffecalincontinence:apreliminaryreportfromafeasibility
study.DisColonRectum2010;53:1604–10.
LehurPA,WyartV,RicheVP.SaFaRI:sacralnervestimulationversustheFenixmagnetic
sphincteraugmentationforadultfaecalincontinence:arandomisedinvestigation.IntJ
ColorectalDis2016;31:1505.
MantooS,MeuretteG,PodevinJ,LehurPA.Themagneticanalsphincter:anewdeviceinthe
managementofseverefecalincontinence.ExpertRevMedDevices2012;9:483–90.
PakravanF,HelmesC.Magneticanalsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithseverefecal
incontinence.DisColonRectum2015;58:109–14.
WilliamsAE,CroftJ,NappV,CorriganN,etal.SaFaRI:sacralnervestimulationversusthe
FENIXmagneticsphincteraugmentationforadultfaecalincontinence:arandomised
investigation.IntJColorectalDis2016;31:465–72.
WongMT,MeuretteG,StangherlinP,LehurPA.Themagneticanalsphincterversustheartificial
bowelsphincter:acomparisonof2treatmentsforfecalincontinence.DisColonRectum
2011;54:773–9.
WongMT,MeuretteG,WyartV,LehurPA.Doesthemagneticanalsphincterdevicecompare
favourablywithsacralnervestimulationinthemanagementoffaecalincontinence?Colorectal
Dis2012;14:e323–9.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
