Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_953_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Dedication
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Technique
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Anatomy
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications

Chapter17
SacralNerveStimulation
KlausE.Matzel
INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
Operativeinterventionforfecalincontinenceshouldonlybeconsidered
whenconservativetreatmentsfailtoresultinadequatesymptomrelief.
Thespectrumofindicationsforsacralnervestimulation(SNS)/sacral
neuromodulationiscontinuallyevolving.Sinceitsfirstuseforthe
treatmentoffecalincontinencein1994,itsapplicationandacceptance
havebroadened.Initialindicationswerelimitedtoaverydistinct
population:patientspresentingwithfecalincontinenceandresidual
functionofaweak,butstructurallyintact,striatedmuscularanal
sphincterandpelvicfloor.However,thefollowingfindingswidenedthe
spectrumofindications:
TheeffectofSNSisnotconfinedtothemuscleisrelevanttocontinence.
Temporaryteststimulationislowrisk.
Theresultofapositiveteststimulationishighlypredictiveoftheclinical
outcomeofchronictherapeuticstimulation.
Today,teststimulationisliberallyused,notonlyinestablished
indicationsbutalsotoexplorepotentialnewindications,bothforspecific
etiologiesleadingtoincontinenceandforotherpathologicalconditionsof
thecolorectumresultinginfunctionaldisorder.Permanentstimulationis
directedbytheclinicaleffectivenessofteststimulation.
Teststimulationisusedonapragmatictrial-and-errorbasisbecauseit
isclinicallyefficientandminimallyinvasiveandbecausecurrentlyno
otherreliableclinicalorphysiologicpredictorforapositiveoutcomeof
chronicSNSwithapermanentneurostimulationdeviceexists.
Patientsareappropriateforteststimulationiftheyhaveexisting,evenif

residual,voluntaryanalsphinctericfunctionorexistingreflex
sphinctericactivity,indicatinganerve–muscleconnection(confirmedby
intactanocutaneousreflexactivity,reflexcontractionduringsneezingor
coughing,oramuscleresponsetopudendalstimulationwiththeSt.
Mark’selectrode).
ThelikelihoodofclinicallyefficientSNSislow,ifthecortical–spinal–
neuralaxisiscompletelydisrupted;however,partialdisruptionofthe
corticospinalaxisdoesnotrepresentacontraindication.
Permanentstimulationwithafullyimplanteddeviceiscommonly
indicatedifthetrialstimulationresultsin>50%symptomimprovement,
usuallymeasuredasthenumberofincontinenceepisodesordayswith
incontinentepisodesperobservedtimeperiod.
Inadditiontogeneralcontraindications(unfitforsurgeryorprone
placement,bleedingdiathesis),contraindicationsforteststimulationand
implantationofthepermanentdeviceincludethefollowing:
Pathologicconditionsofthesacrumpreventingadequateelectrode
placement(suchascongenitalmalformations)
Skindisease(especiallyseptic)attheareaofimplantation
MicturitiondisordersthatareconsideredcontraindicationsforSNS
Pregnancy(ifanSNSdeviceisinplaceandactive,itshouldbe
deactivated)
Psychologicalinstability,mentalinstability,orretardationthatwould
impedetheunderstandingandhandlingofthedeviceprogrammer
Thepresenceofdevicesincompatiblewiththeimplanted
neurostimulator(cardiacpacemakerorimplantabledefibrillator)
Theneedformagneticresonanceimaging(MRI)indiagnosingor
treatinganyothermedicalcondition(thecurrentgenerationof
stimulationsystems(referringtoMedtronicInterstim)isonlyclassified
asconditionallysafefor1.5TheadcoilMRI).

PREOPERATIVEPLANNING
Preoperativeplanningispragmaticandalgorithmic.Decisionmaking
reliessolelyonthedocumentationofthepretreatmentbowelpatternand
itschangeduringtemporarystimulation.Itishelpfultoknowwhether
thepatientsretainvoluntarysphincter/pelvicfloorcontractionsorif
reflexcontractioncanbeprovokedbyapin-pricktestorcoughingor
sneezing.Thesemeasuresmayalsoserveasahelpfulreferenceof
possiblemuscleactivityduetotargetnervestimulationthroughoutthe
electrodepositioning.Ifboth—voluntaryandreflexfunctions—are
missing,SNSislesspromising.
Successoftreatment(andthatofteststimulation)dependson
appropriateelectrodeplacement;preoperativesacralimagingintwo
planesidentifiesindividualvariancesinboneanatomyandsacral
foraminaconfigurationandisespeciallyadvisableincasesofsuspected
malformations.Preoperativebowelcleansingisnotnecessary,butrectal
washoutishelpfultoreducegasintherectum,whichmayobstruct
intraoperativefluoroscopicidentificationofrelevantbonystructuresand
electrodepositioning.
Forimplantationofthepermanentdevice,thepositionofthe
implantablepulsegenerator(INS)shouldbediscussedwiththepatient
andmarkedpreoperatively.Thepatientshouldbeabletoreachitwith
thehandheldprogrammertoactivateanddeactivateitortochange
stimulationamplitudeinapresetrange.Interferencewithpersonal
habitsorclothingshouldbeavoided.

SURGERY
Concept
PermanentSNSisindicatediftrialstimulationresultsinsymptomrelief.
Usually,a50%reductioninthenumberofincontinentepisodesordays
withincontinenceora50%reductioninthevalidatedClevelandClinic
Florida-FecalIncontinenceScore(CCF-FIS)isconsideredadequate.The
trialshouldbelongenoughtoconfirmthesechanges;generally2weeks
issufficient.
TheSNSprocedureconsistsofthreesteps:
Inthefirstdiagnosticstage,acutepercutaneousnerveevaluation(PNE),
theaccessibilityofthenerve/sthroughthesacralforamen,andthe
feasibilityofelectrodeplacementaredetermined.
PNEassessestherelevanceofeachsacralspinalnervetoanal
sphinctericcontractionandanalcanalclosure/pelvicfloorcontraction.
Thisinformationcanhelpperformthefollowing:
sphinctericmusclesandthepatient’sabilitytomakefullvoluntaryuse
ofthem
demonstrateindividualdifferencesofthesomatomotor/somatosensory
innervation
sphinctericnervesupply
Intheseconddiagnosticstep,thetherapeuticpotentialofstimulationis
assessedbytemporarilystimulatingthesacralnerveidentifiedduring
acutetesting.Asatherapeutictrial,itservestoselectpatientswhomay
benefitfrompermanentneurostimulation.Twotechniquesareused:one
withtemporaryelectrodes,whichareremovedafterteststimulation;the
otheronewithanelectrode,whichcanbeusedforpermanent
stimulationifteststimulationisclinicallybeneficial.
Inthethirdstep,theaimistopermanentlyimprovesymptomswith
continuouslow-frequencystimulation.
PNEandpermanentimplantationcanbeperformedunderlocalor
generalanesthesia.
Ifgeneralanesthesiaisused,musclerelaxantsshouldbeavoided.They

suppressthemotorreactionwhenthesacralnervesarestimulatedand
complicatetheidentificationoftheoptimalpositionfortheelectrode.
Iflocalanesthesiaisused,accidentalblockadeoftherelevantsacral
spinalnervesshouldbeavoidedbecausethetechniqueofelectrode
placementdependsonaconductingnerve.
Anatomy
Technically,themostimportantpartoftheprocedureatallstages—acute
testing,subchronicteststimulation,andpermanentimplantation—isthe
appropriateplacementoftheelectrode.Theaimistopositionthe
electrodeclosetothetargetnerve.Itshouldbepositionedclosetothe
exitofthesacralspinalnervesthroughtheventralopeningofthesacral
foramen,atthesitewherethenervesenterthepelviccavityandproximal
totheformationofthesacralplexus.Itshouldbeplacedparalleltothe
targetnerve.
p.124
p.125
Distinct,palpable,bonyanatomiclandmarkshelpidentifythesacral
foramina.Mostcommonly,S3isusedforstimulation;duringthe
procedure,itisalsousedasareferencesitefororientationtoplace
electrodesonS4orS2.
Thefollowinglandmarkshelpidentifytheforamina(Fig.17-1):
Thespinalprocessesmarkthemidline.Variationscanoccur,mostly
distally.
TheS3foramenlevelislocatedmedialtotheupperedgeofthegreater
sciaticnotch.
TheS3foramenlevel(upperedge)correspondstohalfthedistance
betweentheupperedgeofthesacrum(lumbar–sacraljunction)andthe
tipofthecoccyx.
TheS4levelcorrespondswiththesacralcrest.Soft-tissuecoverageis
leastatS4level.
Theforaminaarelocated1–2cmfromthemidline,whichismarkedby
thepalpablespinalprocesses.(Thearrangementoftheforaminarelative
tothemidlinemayvaryfromparalleltoamoreV-shapedpattern.)

FIGURE17-1Sacrumwithlandmarksforpalpation.
Thedistancebetweenthelevelsofthesacralforaminaisapproximately
1.5cm.Thetechniqueofelectrodeimplantationevolvedovertime.Today,
theprocedureisperformedwiththeuseoffluorscopy(MedtronicInc,
Minneapolis,MN).
NeurostimulationDevicesforSNS:MainComponents
TestStimulationLead,MedtronicModel3057:Unipolarlead
designedtobeimplantedadjacenttothesacralnervefortemporary
stimulation.
InterStimTinedLead,MedtronicModel3889:Aquadripolarin-
lineleadcontainingfourcylindricalelectrodesequalinlengthand
spacedequidistantly.Theleadhastinesandmarkerbands.Thetines
anchorthelead,andthemarkerbandsindicateleaddepthandtine
deploymentduringpercutaneousimplantationwithaleadintroducer.
Theelectrodecomeswithaseparatecurved,softerstylet.Thepacked
stifferstyletinthetinedleadelectrodeshouldbereplacedwiththe
curvedstyletfortheprocedure.
InterStimImplantableNeurostimulator,MedtronicModel

3058:Aneurostimulatorproducingelectricalpulsesforstimulation
withavarietyofparameters,modes,andpolarities.Theimplantable
neurostimulatorconnectsdirectlywiththeelectrodewithonescrew.
N’VisionClinicianProgrammer,MedtronicModel8840:Used
byphysicianswithan8870ApplicationCard(software)toprogramand
communicateviatelemetrywithanInterStimorInterStimII
neurostimulator.
iConPatientProgrammer,MedtronicModel3037:Tousewith
theInterStimII(3058)neurostimulator.Thishandheldunitallowsthe
patienttoturntheneurostimulatoronoroff,changepresetprograms,
adjusttheamplitudewithinpresetlimits,andcheckthestatusofthe
neurostimulatorandprogrammerbatteries.
p.125
p.126
PatientPositioning
Thepatientispositionedprone(iffluoroscopywithlateralimagingofthe
sacrumisusedonanX-ray-capableoperatingtable).
Thepelvisiselevatedandsupported;lumbarlordosisshouldbereduced
asmuchaspossible.
Thelegsandfeetarefixed,butshouldbemovable,asconcomitant
movementsoftheipsilaterallegandfootduringstimulationmayaid
electrodeplacement(Fig.17-2).
Thebuttocksaretapedtoallowvisualaccesstotheanusandthe
perineum.Tapingshouldnotbesotightastocounteractstimulationinducedcontractionoftheanusandthepelvicfloor,whichcanbe
delicate.
Theoperativefield(sacrumandbuttock)isdrapedandsterilized.
Visualizationofmotorresponsesoftheanusandtheperianalarea,as
wellasthefeet,shouldbeensured.

FIGURE17-2Patientpositioning:pelvicfloor,anus,and
feetshouldbevisible.Lordosisshouldbeflattened.
Perioperativeantibioticprophylaxisisadvisedforimplantationof
permanentdevices.
PreinterventionalImagingandMarking
Referencestoanatomicallandmarksaremarkedontheskin:Themedial
edgesoftheforaminaareidentifiedwithfluoroscopyandmarkedonthe
skinonbothsideswithverticallinesandthelowerendoftheiliosacral
jointsandmarkedwithahorizontallineresultinginan“H”sign(Fig.17-
3).

FIGURE17-3Imagingofthesecrum:medialedgesofthe
foraminaandlowerendsoftheiliosacraljunctionmarked
resultinginan“H”-sign.A.X-rayandB.onskin.
AcutePercutaneousNerveEvaluation
Foracutepercutaneousnerveevaluation(APNE),needleelectrodes
(MedtronicModel041828or041829ForamenNeedles),notisolatedat
thetipandthetop,areinsertedintothedorsalsacralforaminaofthe
potentiallyrelevantnerve—mostcommonlyS3,butalsoS4.Placementis
guidedbysacralbonylandmarks,the“H”signandsupportedand
confirmedbyfluoroscopy.
Identificationofthesacralforamina:Adistinctsensationof
enteringthedorsalopeningoftheforamen,perforatingrigid
ligamentousstructures(ascomparedwithhittingtheperiosteumofthe
sacrum),isexperienced.

Needleelectrodepositioning:Theangleofinsertionshouldbeacute
tominimizetheriskofnerveorvasculardamage,whichis60degreesat
theleveloftheskin(Fig.17-4).Astheneedlehastocrossthesofttissue
beforeenteringtheforamen,itsentrancepointshouldbecephaladtothe
positionoftheforamen.Theneedleshouldideallybeinsertedatthe
angleofthefusionplaneofthesacrumandstrictlyintheverticallineof
thecentralbodyaxis(theuprightofthe“H”sign).Theentryintothe
foramenshouldbetheuppermedialcorneroftheforamen.
Optimizingpositioning:Oncetheforamenisentered,theneedle
electrodeshouldbemovedinaventraldirection(orback)with
intermittentstimulationofgraduatedamplitude(beginningwithlow
amplitudes).Gentlemovementsinmillimeterstepswithintermittent
stimulationwillhelpoptimizepositioning.Markersontheneedle
electrodeindicatethedepthofplacement.
Responsetostimulation:Amotorresponseofthepelvicfloorand
theanus(ifgeneralanesthesia)orasensoryresponse(iflocal
anesthesia)optimizesthepositioningoftheneedleelectrode.
FIGURE17-4Acuteneedleelectrodeinsertion:oblique
entryintotheforamen.Tipattheventralopeningofthe
foramen.
Althoughtheeffectofstimulationonthepelvicfloorandthelower
extremityactivitymayvaryamongindividuals,thefollowingmotor
responsesaregenerallytypical:
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
